pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.10468 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Phenomenology of Non-Abelian Gauge and Goldstone Bosons in a U(2) Flavor Model

Lorenzo Calibbi , Jiangyi Yi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords flavor physicsU(2) flavor symmetrynon-Abelian gauge bosonspseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosonsflavor changing neutral currentslepton flavor violationexotic decayssymmetry breaking scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Abelian SU(2)_F bosons in a U(2) flavor model generate unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings that flavor experiments can constrain up to 10^12 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the three bosons from the SU(2)_F subgroup of a U(2)_F flavor symmetry. In contrast to the U(1)_F axiflavon, these bosons—either as pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons or as light gauge bosons—couple to fermions with large flavor violation in the mass basis. The resulting effects include exotic decays of kaons and muons that set tight limits on the symmetry breaking scale. For light states the bounds reach 10^11 to 10^12 GeV from K to pi X and mu to e X, while heavier states are limited by B and tau decays plus mixing observables. Low-energy experiments thereby become sensitive to symmetry breaking far above astrophysical scales.

Core claim

The bosons associated with SU(2)_F in the U(2)_F model feature unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings to Standard Model fermions. Both the global symmetry case yielding PNGBs and the gauged case with small coupling produce observable flavor-changing neutral currents and lepton flavor violation. The most stringent constraints come from K → π X and μ → e X for light bosons, reaching v_φ ~ 10^{11}-10^{12} GeV, with heavier states tested in B, τ decays, K-¯K mixing and μ→eγ. This demonstrates that low-energy flavor physics probes ultra-high scales beyond astrophysical limits.

What carries the argument

The triplet of SU(2)_F bosons (PNGBs or gauge bosons) that retain unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings after symmetry breaking to the mass basis.

If this is right

  • K → π X and μ → e X set the strongest bounds on light bosons from the SU(2)_F group.
  • Heavier bosons are constrained by B and τ decays, neutral meson mixing, and radiative lepton decays.
  • Low-energy flavor measurements test symmetry breaking scales up to 10^{12} GeV.
  • Flavor experiments surpass astrophysical limits in probing this model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same flavor-violating effects could appear in other non-Abelian flavor groups if similar symmetry patterns are adopted.
  • Future precision measurements at facilities like Belle II or LHCb could further tighten or discover signals from these bosons.
  • The bosons might connect to broader searches for light particles in cosmology or dark sector experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The SU(2)_F bosons couple to Standard Model fermions with unsuppressed flavor violation in the mass basis and without extra model-dependent suppressions.

What would settle it

A null result in searches for K → π X or μ → e X at branching ratios corresponding to v_φ below 10^{11} GeV would establish or refute the predicted reach of the constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.10468 by Jiangyi Yi, Lorenzo Calibbi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Local SU(2)F case. Regions of the (mW′, gF ) plane excluded by current ex￾perimental limits (cf. Appendix B) on quark sector (left) and lepton sector (right) processes mediated the W′ gauge bosons. Regions above or within the colored contours are excluded. Dotted lines represent expected future bounds. Dashed lines display the astrophysical limits discussed in Appendix C. See the main text for details. 5.3… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Global SU(2)F case. Regions of the (mπ′, vϕ) plane excluded by current ex￾perimental limits (cf. Appendix B) on quark sector (left) and lepton sector (right) processes mediated the π ′ PNGBs. Regions below or within the colored contours are excluded. Dotted lines represent expected future bounds. Dashed lines display the astrophysical limits discussed in Appendix C. See the main text for details. regime, d… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the phenomenological implications of the bosons associated with the $SU(2)_F$ subgroup in a simple and realistic $U(2)_F$ flavor model. While the Nambu-Goldstone boson of the $U(1)_F$ factor behaves as a standard QCD axion (an axiflavon) with suppressed flavor-violating couplings, the three degrees of freedom from $SU(2)_F$ have not been studied before. This work focuses on these states, considering both the case where $SU(2)_F$ is a global symmetry, yielding pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons (PNGBs), and the case where it is a gauge symmetry with a potentially small coupling, yielding a triplet of (possibly) light gauge bosons. In both scenarios, these new bosons naturally feature unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings to Standard Model fermions in the mass basis. We derive the resulting predictions for flavor-changing neutral currents and lepton flavor violation, including exotic decays of mesons and leptons. Our analysis shows that processes like $K \to \pi X$ and $\mu \to e X$ place the most stringent constraints, probing the flavor symmetry breaking scale $v_\phi$ up to $10^{11}-10^{12}$~GeV for light bosons, while heavier states are tested in $B$ and $\tau$ decays, as well as by $K-\bar K$ mixing and $\mu\to e \gamma$. We demonstrate that low-energy flavor experiments provide a powerful probe of this framework, capable of testing ultra-high symmetry breaking scales that surpass the limits set by astrophysical observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the phenomenology of the three SU(2)_F bosons arising in a U(2)_F flavor model. It treats both the global-symmetry case (yielding PNGBs) and the weakly gauged case (yielding light gauge bosons), arguing that the symmetry-breaking pattern and fermion representations naturally produce unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings to SM fermions once rotated to the mass basis. Standard effective-operator matching is used to compute rates for K → πX, μ → eX, B and τ decays, K-¯K mixing, and μ → eγ. The resulting bounds show that low-energy flavor processes can probe the symmetry-breaking scale v_φ up to 10^{11}–10^{12} GeV for light states, with heavier states constrained by other channels.

Significance. If the coupling structure and operator matching hold, the work demonstrates that flavor experiments can reach symmetry-breaking scales well beyond current astrophysical limits, providing a concrete phenomenological handle on non-Abelian flavor symmetries. The explicit comparison between global and gauged realizations, together with the focus on previously unstudied SU(2)_F states, fills a gap left by axiflavon studies and supplies falsifiable predictions for ongoing and future flavor searches.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrases 'light bosons' and 'heavier states' are used without numerical mass ranges; adding approximate intervals (e.g., m_X ≲ 100 MeV vs. m_X ≳ few GeV) would improve readability.
  2. [Model section] The derivation of the flavor-violating couplings after rotation to the mass basis is central; a short appendix or subsection explicitly showing the unitary matrices and the resulting coupling matrix elements would make the 'unsuppressed' claim easier to verify.
  3. [Phenomenology] Table or figure summarizing the strongest bound on v_φ for each process and mass regime would help the reader compare the reach of different channels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary correctly identifies the central role of the SU(2)_F bosons and the strong constraints from low-energy flavor processes. We address the points raised below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The paper investigates the phenomenology of the three SU(2)_F bosons arising in a U(2)_F flavor model. It treats both the global-symmetry case (yielding PNGBs) and the weakly gauged case (yielding light gauge bosons), arguing that the symmetry-breaking pattern and fermion representations naturally produce unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings to SM fermions once rotated to the mass basis. Standard effective-operator matching is used to compute rates for K → πX, μ → eX, B and τ decays, K-¯K mixing, and μ → eγ. The resulting bounds show that low-energy flavor processes can probe the symmetry-breaking scale v_φ up to 10^{11}–10^{12} GeV for light states, with heavier states constrained by other channels.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this accurate summary of the manuscript. The unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings in the mass basis follow directly from the U(2)_F charge assignments and the rotation to the fermion mass eigenstates, as derived in Sections 2 and 3. The effective-operator matching and the resulting bounds from K → πX and μ → eX are the primary results for light states. No revision is required on this point. revision: no

  2. Referee: If the coupling structure and operator matching hold, the work demonstrates that flavor experiments can reach symmetry-breaking scales well beyond current astrophysical limits, providing a concrete phenomenological handle on non-Abelian flavor symmetries. The explicit comparison between global and gauged realizations, together with the focus on previously unstudied SU(2)_F states, fills a gap left by axiflavon studies and supplies falsifiable predictions for ongoing and future flavor searches.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's recognition of the significance of the results. The comparison between the global (PNGB) and gauged cases is presented in Sections 4 and 5, and the predictions for ongoing experiments are summarized in the conclusions. We agree that these provide testable signatures beyond axiflavon phenomenology. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper defines a U(2)_F flavor model with chosen fermion representations under the symmetry, from which the unsuppressed flavor-violating couplings of the SU(2)_F bosons (in both global and gauged cases) follow directly as a model feature once rotated to the mass basis. All subsequent predictions for processes such as K → πX, μ → eX, B decays, and μ→eγ are obtained via standard effective-operator matching to experimental limits, without any parameter fitting inside the paper, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The derivation remains independent and externally falsifiable against flavor-violation data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on the existence of a U(2)_F flavor symmetry broken at scale v_phi, with the SU(2)_F subgroup producing three new bosonic degrees of freedom whose couplings are determined by the symmetry breaking pattern.

free parameters (2)
  • v_φ
    Flavor symmetry breaking scale; constrained by data rather than derived from first principles.
  • gauge coupling g
    Possibly small coupling when SU(2)_F is gauged; chosen to keep states light.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption U(2)_F is a flavor symmetry of the model that is broken spontaneously at scale v_φ
    Standard assumption in flavor model building to explain fermion mass hierarchies and mixings.
invented entities (1)
  • SU(2)_F triplet of PNGBs or gauge bosons no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediate unsuppressed flavor-violating interactions in the mass basis
    New states introduced by promoting or keeping the non-Abelian subgroup; no independent evidence outside the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 1510 out tokens · 44518 ms · 2026-05-17T22:38:20.499209+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hierarchies from Higher Flavor Spin

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Yukawa hierarchies are generated from powers of fully anarchic spurions in higher SU(2) and SU(3) flavor representations via progressive rank lifting through composite outer products, with explicit models and predicti...

  2. ALP production in Lepton Flavour Violating meson, tau and gauge boson decays

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ALPs with LFV couplings above the muon mass threshold can be produced in LFV meson, tau, and gauge boson decays, yielding clean eμ signatures that enable new searches at future experiments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Pieces of the Flavour Puzzle

    F. Feruglio,Pieces of the Flavour Puzzle,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 373 [1503.04071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys

    Z.-z. Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys. Rept. 854(2020) 1 [1909.09610]

    work page arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Altmannshofer,TASI 2022 lectures on flavor physics,PoST ASI2022(2024) 001

    W. Altmannshofer,TASI 2022 lectures on flavor physics,PoST ASI2022(2024) 001. 23

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Hook,TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions, PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004, [1812.02669]

    A. Hook,TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions,PoST ASI2018 (2019) 004 [1812.02669]

    work page arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models,Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1 [2003.01100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

    work page 1978

  9. [9]

    Minimal Flavour Violation: an effective field theory approach

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia,Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach,Nucl. Phys. B645(2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Wilczek,Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1549

    work page 1982

  11. [11]

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 277

    work page 1979

  12. [12]

    Mass Matrix Models

    M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg,Mass matrix models,Nucl. Phys. B398(1993) 319 [hep-ph/9212278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  13. [13]

    Mass Matrix Models: The Sequel

    M. Leurer, Y. Nir and N. Seiberg,Mass matrix models: The Sequel,Nucl. Phys. B420 (1994) 468 [hep-ph/9310320]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  14. [14]

    Y. Ema, K. Hamaguchi, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama,Flaxion: a minimal extension to solve puzzles in the standard model,JHEP01(2017) 096 [1612.05492]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    The Axiflavon

    L. Calibbi, F. Goertz, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Minimal axion model from flavor,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 095009 [1612.08040]. [16]NA62collaboration,Measurement of the very rareK + →π +ν¯νdecay,JHEP06 (2021) 093 [2103.15389]. [17]NA62collaboration,Searches for hidden sectors usingK + →π +Xdecays, 2507.17286

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Smolkoviˇ c, M

    A. Smolkoviˇ c, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan,Anomaly free Froggatt-Nielsen models of flavor,JHEP10(2019) 188 [1907.10063]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Fedele, A

    M. Fedele, A. Mastroddi and M. Valli,Minimal Froggatt-Nielsen textures,JHEP03 (2021) 135 [2009.05587]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Nishimura, C

    S. Nishimura, C. Miyao and H. Otsuka,Exploring the flavor structure of quarks and leptons with reinforcement learning,JHEP23(2020) 021 [2304.14176]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Cornella, D

    C. Cornella, D. Curtin, E. T. Neil and J. O. Thompson,Mapping and probing Froggatt-Nielsen solutions to the quark flavor puzzle,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 015042 [2306.08026]. 24

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Blasi, L

    S. Blasi, L. Calibbi, A. Mariotti and K. Turbang,Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in Froggatt-Nielsen flavour models,JHEP05(2025) 019 [2410.08668]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    M. Ibe, S. Shirai and K. Watanabe,Comprehensive Bayesian exploration of Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism,JHEP03(2025) 150 [2412.19484]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Cornella, D

    C. Cornella, D. Curtin, G. Krnjaic and M. Mellors,Testing the Froggatt-Nielsen Mechanism with Lepton Violation,2501.00629

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    The Messenger Sector of SUSY Flavour Models and Radiative Breaking of Flavour Universality

    L. Calibbi, Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler,The Messenger Sector of SUSY Flavour Models and Radiative Breaking of Flavour Universality,JHEP06(2012) 018 [1203.1489]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Universal Constraints on Low-Energy Flavour Models

    L. Calibbi, Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler,Universal Constraints on Low-Energy Flavour Models,JHEP07(2012) 004 [1204.1275]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Predictions From A U(2) Flavour Symmetry In Supersymmetric Theories

    R. Barbieri, G. R. Dvali and L. J. Hall,Predictions from a U(2) flavor symmetry in supersymmetric theories,Phys. Lett. B377(1996) 76 [hep-ph/9512388]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  26. [26]

    Consequences of a U(2) Flavour Symmetry

    R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall and A. Romanino,Consequences of a U(2) flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B401(1997) 47 [hep-ph/9702315]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  27. [27]

    R. G. Roberts, A. Romanino, G. G. Ross and L. Velasco-Sevilla,Precision Test of a Fermion Mass Texture,Nucl. Phys. B615(2001) 358 [hep-ph/0104088]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Linking Natural Supersymmetry to Flavour Physics

    E. Dudas, G. von Gersdorff, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler,Linking Natural Supersymmetry to Flavour Physics,JHEP01(2014) 117 [1308.1090]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Lepton Flavor Non-Universality in B-meson Decays from a U(2) Flavor Model

    A. Falkowski, M. Nardecchia and R. Ziegler,Lepton Flavor Non-Universality in B-meson Decays from a U(2) Flavor Model,JHEP11(2015) 173 [1509.01249]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    A Realistic U(2) Model of Flavor

    M. Linster and R. Ziegler,A RealisticU(2)Model of Flavor,JHEP08(2018) 058 [1805.07341]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Quark masses, CKM angles and Lepton Flavour Universality violation

    R. Barbieri and R. Ziegler,Quark masses, CKM angles and Lepton Flavour Universality violation,JHEP07(2019) 023 [1904.04121]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Linster, J

    M. Linster, J. Lopez-Pavon and R. Ziegler,Neutrino Observables from a U(2) Flavor Symmetry,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 015020 [2009.10437]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Calibbi, D

    L. Calibbi, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Looking forward to lepton-flavor-violating ALPs,JHEP09(2021) 173 [2006.04795]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Giarnetti, S

    A. Giarnetti, S. Marciano, D. Meloni and M. Rettaroli,A Roadmap for neutrino charge assignments inU(2) F Flavor Models: Implications for LFV processes and leptonic anomalous magnetic moments,2505.20281

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1566

    work page 1979

  36. [36]

    The QCD axion, precisely

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro,The QCD axion, precisely,JHEP01(2016) 034 [1511.02867]. 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B 120(1983) 127

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 133

    work page 1983

  39. [39]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137. [42]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1983

  40. [40]

    Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys

    E. Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 324

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    Massive hidden photons as lukewarm dark matter

    J. Redondo and M. Postma,Massive hidden photons as lukewarm dark matter,JCAP 02(2009) 005 [0811.0326]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    Reece, TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics , PoS TASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

    M. Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoST ASI2022 (2024) 008 [2304.08512]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    J. F. Eguren, S. Klingel, E. Stamou, M. Tabet and R. Ziegler,Flavor phenomenology of light dark vectors,JHEP08(2024) 111 [2405.00108]. [47]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of Particle Physics,PTEP2022(2022) 083C01. [48]Flavour Lattice A veraging Groupcollaboration,FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG),Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 113 ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    J. A. Bailey et al.,B→Kl +l− Decay Form Factors from Three-Flavor Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 025026 [1509.06235]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Lepton flavor violation with light vector bosons

    J. Heeck,Lepton flavor violation with light vector bosons,Phys. Lett. B758(2016) 101 [1602.03810]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Ibarra, M

    A. Ibarra, M. Mar´ ın and P. Roig,Flavor violating muon decay into an electron and a light gauge boson,Phys. Lett. B827(2022) 136933 [2110.03737]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Martin Camalich, M

    J. Martin Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Quark Flavor Phenomenology of the QCD Axion,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 015023 [2002.04623]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm,Flavor probes of axion-like particles,JHEP09(2022) 056 [2110.10698]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Altmannshofer, A

    W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia and J. Martin Camalich,Light new physics inB→K (∗)ν¯ν?,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075008 [2311.14629]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Cornella, P

    C. Cornella, P. Paradisi and O. Sumensari,Hunting for ALPs with Lepton Flavor Violation,JHEP01(2020) 158 [1911.06279]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    R. H. Bernstein and P. S. Cooper,Charged Lepton Flavor Violation: An Experimenter’s Guide,Phys. Rept.532(2013) 27 [1307.5787]. 26 [57]NA62collaboration,The Beam and detector of the NA62 experiment at CERN,JINST 12(2017) P05025 [1703.08501]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Silvestrini and M

    L. Silvestrini and M. Valli,Model-independent Bounds on the Standard Model Effective Theory from Flavour Physics,Phys. Lett. B799(2019) 135062 [1812.10913]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Calibbi, X

    L. Calibbi, X. Marcano and J. Roy,Z lepton flavour violation as a probe for new physics at futuree +e− colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 1054 [2107.10273]. [60]SINDRUMcollaboration,Search for the Decayµ + →e +e+e−,Nucl. Phys. B260 (1985) 1. [61]MEG IIcollaboration,New limit on theµ + →e +γdecay with the MEG II experiment, 2504.15711. [62]TWISTcollaboratio...

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Banerjee et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector,2203.14919

    S. Banerjee et al.,Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector,2203.14919

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Blum et al.,Discovering new physics in rare kaon decays, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022,2203.10998

    T. Blum et al.,Discovering new physics in rare kaon decays, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022,2203.10998. [66]HIKEcollaboration,HIKE, High Intensity Kaon Experiments at the CERN SPS: Letter of Intent,2211.16586

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Datta, A

    A. Datta, A. Hammad, D. Marfatia, L. Mukherjee and A. Rashed,Dark photon and dark Z mediated B meson decays,JHEP03(2023) 108 [2210.15662]. [68]MEG IIcollaboration,The design of the MEG II experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 380 [1801.04688]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Research Proposal for an Experiment to Search for the Decay {\mu} -> eee

    A. Blondel et al.,Research Proposal for an Experiment to Search for the Decay µ→eee,1301.6113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    The Rare and Forbidden: Testing Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Mu3e

    A. Jodidio et al.,Search for Right-Handed Currents in Muon Decay,Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 1967. [71]Mu3ecollaboration,The Rare and Forbidden: Testing Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Mu3e,SciPost Phys. Proc.1(2019) 052 [1812.00741]. [72]Bellecollaboration,Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays toℓγat Belle, JHEP10(2021) 19 [2103.12994]. [...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1986

  59. [59]

    Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs

    K. Hayasaka et al.,Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs,Phys. Lett. B687(2010) 139 [1001.3221]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  60. [60]

    An Improved upper limit on the decay K^+ -> pi^+ mu^+ e^-

    A. Sher et al.,An Improved upper limit on the decay K+ —>pi+ mu+ e-,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 012005 [hep-ex/0502020]. [79]NA62collaboration,Prospects for exotics and LFV at NA62,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.800 (2017) 012039. [80]LHCbcollaboration,Search for Lepton-Flavor Violating DecaysB + →K +µ±e∓,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 241802 [1909.01010]. [81]BaBarcollaboration...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    G. G. Raffelt,Astrophysical methods to constrain axions and other novel particle phenomena,Phys. Rept.198(1990) 1

    work page 1990

  62. [62]

    Stellar Recipes for Axion Hunters

    M. Giannotti, I. G. Irastorza, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and K. Saikawa,Stellar Recipes for Axion Hunters,JCAP10(2017) 010 [1708.02111]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Neutrino and axion bounds from the globular cluster M5 (NGC 5904)

    N. Viaux, M. Catelan, P. B. Stetson, G. Raffelt, J. Redondo, A. A. R. Valcarce et al., Neutrino and axion bounds from the globular cluster M5 (NGC 5904),Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(2013) 231301 [1311.1669]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    A Fresh Look at Axions and SN 1987A

    W. Keil, H.-T. Janka, D. N. Schramm, G. Sigl, M. S. Turner and J. R. Ellis,A Fresh look at axions and SN-1987A,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 2419 [astro-ph/9612222]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  65. [65]

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo,New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102(2018) 89 [1801.08127]. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018