pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.15483 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.optics

Long-Range Magnetic Order in Structurally Embedded Mesospin Metamaterials

Christina Vantaraki , Oier Bikondoa , Mat\'ias P. Grassi , Brindaban Ojha , Alkaios Stamatelatos , Natalia Kwiatek-Maroszek , Miguel Angel Ni\~no Orti , Michael Foerster
show 6 more authors
Thomas Saerbeck Daniel Primetzhofer Max Wolff Nicolas Jaouen Thomas P. A. Hase Vassilios Kapaklis
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords mesospinsmagnetic metamaterialsantiferromagnetic orderion implantationpalladiumresonant X-ray scatteringlong-range orderthin films
0
0 comments X

The pith

Iron mesospins implanted in palladium films spontaneously form long-range antiferromagnetic order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that by implanting iron ions into a palladium thin film, researchers can create uniform arrays of mesospins that develop extended antiferromagnetic order directly in the fabricated state. Unlike conventional methods that require additional annealing or field treatments and often suffer from structural disorder, this embedded approach maintains coherence. Sympathetic readers would care as it opens a path to large-scale, high-quality magnetic metamaterials for applications in spintronics and advanced scattering techniques.

Core claim

By structuring matter at the mesoscale through controlled ion implantation of iron into a non-magnetic palladium host, we realize morphologically uniform arrays of mesospins that spontaneously develop extended antiferromagnetic order without external annealing or field cycling. Resonant X-ray scattering reveals sharp magnetic Bragg peaks modulated by the mesospin form factor, demonstrating long-range antiferromagnetic order coupled to structural coherence. This establishes an embedded architecture for coherent spin systems free from lithographic topography and disorder.

What carries the argument

The mesospin metamaterial created by ion implantation in the palladium matrix, enabling intrinsic antiferromagnetic ordering through magnetic interactions while preserving uniformity.

If this is right

  • Large-area metamaterials can be produced with high morphological uniformity.
  • Antiferromagnetic order emerges intrinsically without post-fabrication processing.
  • Sharp Bragg peaks confirm coupling between magnetic order and structural coherence.
  • Platform created for exploring spin-photon interactions and X-ray functional devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This fabrication route may reduce the impact of disorder compared to lithography, benefiting device performance.
  • Similar embedding techniques could be applied to other non-magnetic hosts or magnetic ions to engineer different orders.
  • Scalability suggests potential for integrating these metamaterials into larger systems for sensing or data storage.

Load-bearing premise

Ion implantation creates mesospins whose interactions produce long-range antiferromagnetic order while keeping the structure coherent enough to avoid significant broadening of Bragg peaks.

What would settle it

If resonant X-ray scattering on the as-fabricated samples shows no sharp magnetic Bragg peaks or only broad features, this would indicate a lack of long-range antiferromagnetic order.

read the original abstract

Engineered assemblies of interacting magnetic elements-magnetic metamaterials-provide a powerful route to tailor collective magnetic order and dynamics. By structuring matter at the mesoscale, they bridge atomic magnetism and macroscopic functionality, enabling emergent behaviour inaccessible in conventional materials. However, realizing large-area metamaterials that combine high morphological uniformity with intrinsic long-range order has remained challenging, largely due to the structural disorder inherent to lithographic fabrication. Here we demonstrate a scalable route to structurally and magnetically coherent metamaterials by embedding iron-ions to form mesospins within a non-magnetic thin film palladium host matrix. Using controlled implantation, we realize morphologically uniform arrays that spontaneously develop extended antiferromagnetic order in the as-fabricated state - without the need of external annealing or field cycling. Resonant X-ray scattering and microscopy reveal sharp magnetic Bragg peaks modulated by the mesospin form factor, evidencing long-range antiferromagnetic order coupled to structural coherence. This embedded architecture establishes a platform for exploring coherent spin-photon interactions and functional X-ray scattering in magnetic metamaterials free from lithographic topography and disorder.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a fabrication approach for magnetic metamaterials in which iron ions are implanted into a non-magnetic Pd thin-film host to create arrays of mesospins. These structures are claimed to spontaneously develop long-range antiferromagnetic order in the as-fabricated state, without annealing or field cycling. The central evidence consists of resonant X-ray scattering data showing sharp magnetic Bragg peaks whose intensity is modulated by the mesospin form factor, taken as proof of both long-range magnetic order and structural coherence.

Significance. If the experimental observations hold, the work demonstrates a scalable route to morphologically uniform, lithographically disorder-free magnetic metamaterials that exhibit intrinsic long-range antiferromagnetic order. This could open avenues for coherent spin-photon coupling and functional resonant X-ray studies in mesoscale magnetic systems. The avoidance of post-fabrication processing steps is a notable practical advantage over prior lithographic metamaterial approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Resonant X-ray scattering results] Resonant X-ray scattering results: the manuscript presents sharp Bragg peaks as direct evidence of long-range antiferromagnetic order, yet provides no quantitative peak-width analysis, extracted magnetic correlation lengths, or error estimates on the peak intensities. Without these, it is difficult to rigorously distinguish true long-range order from finite-size or weakly disordered correlations.
  2. [Methods and sample preparation] Sample characterization and statistics: the central claim that controlled ion implantation preserves structural coherence without introducing significant defects relies on the observed sharpness of the Bragg peaks, but the paper does not report implantation-dose uniformity across multiple samples, rocking-curve widths, or direct comparison of magnetic versus structural peak broadening.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and main text use the term 'mesospin' without an explicit definition or reference to prior usage in the first occurrence; a brief clarification would improve readability.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the scattering data should explicitly state the X-ray energy, polarization, and temperature at which the measurements were performed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantitative analyses and additional characterization details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Resonant X-ray scattering results: the manuscript presents sharp Bragg peaks as direct evidence of long-range antiferromagnetic order, yet provides no quantitative peak-width analysis, extracted magnetic correlation lengths, or error estimates on the peak intensities. Without these, it is difficult to rigorously distinguish true long-range order from finite-size or weakly disordered correlations.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative analysis would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added Lorentzian fits to the magnetic Bragg peaks (now shown in Supplementary Figure S3) from which we extract a magnetic correlation length of ~1.2 μm. Intensity uncertainties are now reported based on Poisson counting statistics. These additions allow a clearer distinction from finite-size effects while preserving the original interpretation that the observed sharpness together with form-factor modulation evidences long-range order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Sample characterization and statistics: the central claim that controlled ion implantation preserves structural coherence without introducing significant defects relies on the observed sharpness of the Bragg peaks, but the paper does not report implantation-dose uniformity across multiple samples, rocking-curve widths, or direct comparison of magnetic versus structural peak broadening.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies the lack of these supporting statistics. We have now included rocking-curve data for both structural and magnetic reflections, demonstrating comparable widths (FWHM ~0.05° for both). Implantation-dose uniformity across three independently prepared samples is reported with a standard deviation of <8 %. A direct comparison of magnetic and structural peak broadenings is added to the results section, confirming that the magnetic order does not introduce measurable additional disorder beyond the structural coherence already present. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

This is an experimental paper whose central claim rests on direct resonant X-ray scattering and microscopy measurements of sharp magnetic Bragg peaks in ion-implanted mesospin arrays. No derivation chain, theoretical model, fitted parameters, or self-citation load-bearing argument is present; the reported long-range antiferromagnetic order is an empirical observation in the as-fabricated state, not a prediction that reduces to its own inputs by construction. The fabrication and measurement steps are presented as independent of any internal self-referential logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the work uses standard experimental techniques in ion implantation and resonant X-ray scattering. No explicit free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new postulated entities with independent evidence are stated; the mesospin concept is introduced to interpret the implanted ions as the source of the observed order.

invented entities (1)
  • mesospin no independent evidence
    purpose: To label the magnetic moments formed by implanted iron ions that serve as the building blocks for the metamaterial order
    The term is used to describe the mesoscale magnetic elements whose collective behavior produces the reported antiferromagnetic order.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1311 out tokens · 75547 ms · 2026-05-17T20:44:32.400076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. J. Heyderman and R. L. Stamps, Artificial ferroic systems: novel functionality from structure, interactions and dynamics,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25, 363201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Nisoli, R

    C. Nisoli, R. Moessner, and P . Schiffer, Colloquium: Artificial spin ice: Designing and imaging magnetic frustration,Review of Modern Physics85, 1473 – 1490 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Nisoli, V

    C. Nisoli, V . Kapaklis, and P . Schiffer, Deliberate exotic magnetism via frustration and topology,Nature Physics13, 200 – 203 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Rougemaille and B

    N. Rougemaille and B. Canals, Cooperative magnetic phenomena in artificial spin systems: spin liquids, Coulomb phase and fragmentation of magnetism – a colloquium,Eur . Phys. J. B92, 62 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    S. H. Skjærvø, C. H. Marrows, R. L. Stamps, and L. J. Heyderman, Advances in artificial spin ice,Nature Reviews Physics2, 13–28 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    R. F . W ang, C. Nisoli, R. S. Freitas, J. Li, W . McConville, B. J. Cooley, M. S. Lund, N. Samarth, C. Leighton, V . H. Crespi, and P . Schiffer, Artificial ’spin ice’ in a geometrically frustrated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands,Nature439, 303–306 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Kapaklis, U

    V . Kapaklis, U. B. Arnalds, A. Harman-Clarke, E. T . Papaioannou, M. Karimipour, P . Korelis, A. T aroni, P . C. W . Holdsworth, S. T . Bramwell, and B. Hjörvarsson, Melting artificial spin ice,New Journal of Physics 14, 35009 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Zhang, I

    S. Zhang, I. Gilbert, C. Nisoli, G.-W . Chern, M. J. Erickson, L. O’Brien, C. Leighton, P . E. Lammert, V . H. Crespi, and P . Schiffer, Crystallites of magnetic charges in artificial spin ice,Nature500, 553 – 557 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Kapaklis, U

    V . Kapaklis, U. B. Arnalds, A. Farhan, R. V . Chopdekar, A. Balan, A. Scholl, L. J. Heyderman, and B. Hjörvarsson, Thermal fluctuations in artificial spin ice,Nature Nanotechnology9, 514–519 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Zhang, G

    X. Zhang, G. Fitez, S. Subzwari, N. S. Bingham, I.-A. Chioar, H. Saglam, J. Ramberger, C. Leighton, C. Nisoli, and P . Schiffer, T opological kinetic crossover in a nanomagnet array,Science380, 526–531 (2023). 16

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Hurben, Y

    A. Hurben, Y . Hao, I.-A. Chioar, L. Y ang, N. Strandqvist, M. Saccone, N. S. Bingham, J. Ramberger, C. Leighton, C. Nisoli, and P . Schiffer, Fractional magnetic charges and channeling of Faraday lines by disclinations in artificial spin ice,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2415101122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    B. E. Skovdal, N. Strandqvist, H. Stopfel, M. Pohlit, T . W arnatz, S. D. Slöetjes, V . Kapaklis, and B. Hjörvarsson, Temperature-induced collapse of spin dimensionality in magnetic metamaterials,Physical Review B104, 014434 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Strandqvist, B

    N. Strandqvist, B. E. Skovdal, M. Pohlit, H. Stopfel, L. v. Dijk, V . Kapaklis, and B. Hjörvarsson, Emergent anisotropy and textures in two dimensional magnetic arrays,Physical Review Materials6, 105201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    J. C. Gartside, K. D. Stenning, A. V anstone, H. H. Holder, D. M. Arroo, T . Dion, F . Caravelli, H. Kurebayashi, and W . R. Branford, Reconfigurable training and reservoir computing in an artificial spin-vortex ice via spin-wave fingerprinting,Nature Nanotechnology17, 460–469 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    M. T . Kaffash, S. Lendinez, and M. B. Jungfleisch, Nanomagnonics with artificial spin ice,Physics Letters A402, 127364 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Gypens, J

    P . Gypens, J. Leliaert, and B. V . W aeyenberge, Balanced Magnetic Logic Gates in a Kagome Spin Ice, Physical Review Applied9, 034004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Arava, N

    H. Arava, N. Leo, D. Schildknecht, J. Cui, J. Vijayakumar, P . M. Derlet, A. Kleibert, and L. J. Heyderman, Engineering Relaxation Pathways in Building Blocks of Artificial Spin Ice for Computation,Physical Review Applied11, 054086 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    J. H. Jensen, A. Strømberg, I. Breivik, A. Penty, M. A. Niño, M. W . Khaliq, M. Foerster, G. Tufte, and E. Folven, Clocked dynamics in artificial spin ice,Nature Communications15, 964 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    J. S. W oods, X. M. Chen, R. V . Chopdekar, B. Farmer, C. Mazzoli, R. Koch, A. S. Tremsin, W . Hu, A. Scholl, S. Kevan, S. Wilkins, W .-K. Kwok, L. E. D. Long, S. Roy, and J. T . Hastings, Switchable X-Ray Orbital Angular Momentum from an Artificial Spin Ice,Physical Review Letters126, 117201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    M. R. McCarter, A. I. U. Saleheen, A. Singh, R. Tumbleson, J. S. W oods, A. S. Tremsin, A. Scholl, L. E. De Long, J. T . Hastings, S. A. Morley, and S. Roy, Antiferromagnetic real-space configuration probed by dichroism in scattered x-ray beams with orbital angular momentum,Physical Review B107, L060407 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    V ogel, A

    J. V ogel, A. Fontaine, V . Cros, F . Petroff, J.-P . Kappler, G. Krill, A. Rogalev, and J. Goulon, Structure and magnetism of Pd in Pd/Fe multilayers studied by x-ray magnetic circular dichroism at the Pd L2,3 edges, Physical Review B55, 3663 – 3669 (1997)

    work page 1997

  22. [22]

    T . P . A. Hase, M. S. Brewer, U. B. Arnalds, M. Ahlberg, V . Kapaklis, M. Björck, L. Bouchenoire, P . Thompson, D. Haskel, Y . Choi, J. Lang, C. Sánchez-Hanke, and B. Hjörvarsson, Proximity effects on 17 dimensionality and magnetic ordering in Pd/Fe/Pd trialyers,Physical Review B90, 104403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    E. T . Papaioannou, V . Kapaklis, A. T aroni, M. Marcellini, and B. Hjörvarsson, Dimensionality and confinement effects inδ-doped Pd(Fe) layers,Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter22, 236004 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Ström, S

    P . Ström, S. Ghorai, T . T . Tran, and D. Primetzhofer, Synthesis of ferromagnetic thin films and engineering of their magnetic properties by Fe ion implantation in polycrystalline Pd,Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials552, 169207 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    V antaraki, P

    C. V antaraki, P . Ström, T . T . Tran, M. P . Grassi, G. Fevola, M. Foerster, J. T . Sadowski, D. Primetzhofer, and V . Kapaklis, Magnetic metamaterials by ion-implantation,Applied Physics Letters125, 202403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    V antaraki, K

    C. V antaraki, K. Ignatova, D. Moldarev, M. P . Grassi, M. Foerster, D. Primetzhofer, U. B. Arnalds, and V . Ka- paklis, Magnetic texture control in ion-implanted metamaterials,Physical Review Materials9, 084402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    C. H. Marrows, J. P . Morgan, A. Stein, and S. Langridge, Thermal ground-state ordering and elementary excitations in artificial magnetic square ice,Nature Physics7, 75–79 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    U. B. Arnalds, J. Chico, H. Stopfel, V . Kapaklis, O. Bärenbold, M. A. V erschuuren, U. W olff, V . Neu, A. Bergman, and B. Hjörvarsson, A new look on the two-dimensional Ising model: thermal artificial spins, New Journal of Physics18, 023008 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Östman, H

    E. Östman, H. Stopfel, I.-A. Chioar, U. B. Arnalds, A. Stein, V . Kapaklis, and B. Hjörvarsson, Interaction modifiers in artificial spin ices,Nature Physics14, 375–379 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Drisko, S

    J. Drisko, S. Daunheimer, and J. Cumings, FePd sub(3) as a material for studying thermally active artificial spin ice systems,Physical Review B91, 224406 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Schlepütz, S

    C. Schlepütz, S. Mariager, S. Pauli, R. Feidenhans’l, and P . Willmott, Angle calculations for a (2+3)-type diffractometer: focus on area detectors,Journal of Applied Crystallography44, 73–83 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    J. J. Als-Nielsen and D. McMorrow, Elements of modern X-ray physics (John Wiley, Chichester, W est Sussex, 2011), 2nd ed. edition

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    X. Chen, B. Farmer, J. W oods, S. Dhuey, W . Hu, C. Mazzoli, S. Wilkins, R. Chopdekar, A. Scholl, I. Robinson, L. De Long, S. Roy, and J. Hastings, Spontaneous Magnetic Superdomain W all Fluctuations in an Artificial Antiferromagnet,Physical Review Letters123, 197202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Perron, L

    J. Perron, L. Anghinolfi, B. Tudu, N. Jaouen, J.-M. T onnerre, M. Sacchi, F . Nolting, J. Lüning, and L. J. Heyderman, Extended reciprocal space observation of artificial spin ice with x-ray resonant magnetic scattering,Physical Review B88, 214424 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Digernes, S

    E. Digernes, S. D. Slöetjes, A. Strømberg, A. D. Bang, F . K. Olsen, E. Arenholz, R. V . Chopdekar, J. K. Grepstad, and E. Folven, Direct imaging of long-range ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic order in a dipolar 18 metamaterial,Physical Review Research2, 013222– (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Als-Nielsen and D

    J. Als-Nielsen and D. McMorrow, Kinematical scattering I: non-crystalline materials, chapter 4, pp. 113–146 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Sendetskyi, L

    O. Sendetskyi, L. Anghinolfi, V . Scagnoli, G. Möller, N. Leo, A. Alberca, J. Kohlbrecher, J. Lüning, U. Staub, and L. J. Heyderman, Magnetic diffuse scattering in artificial kagome spin ice,Physical Review B93, 224413 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    S. A. Morley, D. A. V enero, J. M. Porro, S. T . Riley, A. Stein, P . Steadman, R. L. Stamps, S. Langridge, and C. H. Marrows, V ogel-Fulcher-T ammann freezing of a thermally fluctuating artificial spin ice probed by x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy,Physical Review B95, 104422 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    J. Guo, P . Ghosh, D. Hill, Y . Chen, L. Stingaciu, P . Zolnierczuk, C. A. Ullrich, and D. K. Singh, Persistent dynamic magnetic state in artificial honeycomb spin ice,Nature Communications14, 5212 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    W . Hu, Z. Zhang, Y . Liao, Q. Li, Y . Shi, H. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. Niu, Y . Wu, W . Y u, X. Zhou, H. Guo, W . W ang, J. Xiao, L. Yin, Q. Liu, and J. Shen, Distinguishing artificial spin ice states using magnetoresistance effect for neuromorphic computing,Nature Communications14, 2562 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Penty, J

    A. Penty, J. H. Jensen, I. Breivik, A. Strømberg, E. Folven, and G. Tufte, Controllable gliders in a nanomagnetic metamaterial,Nature Communications16, 7500 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    J. Dong, M. Rafayelyan, F . Krzakala, and S. Gigan, Optical Reservoir Computing Using Multiple Light Scatter- ing for Chaotic Systems Prediction,IEEE Journal of Selected T opics in Quantum Electronics26, 1–12 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    W ang, J

    H. W ang, J. Hu, Y . Baek, K. Tsuchiyama, M. Joly, Q. Liu, and S. Gigan, Optical next generation reservoir computing,Light: Science & Applications14, 245 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    J. H. Jensen, E. Folven, and G. Tufte, Computation in artificial spin ice, in T . Ikegami, N. Virgo, O. Witkowski, M. Oka, R. Suzuki, and H. Iizuka (Editors), ALIFE 2022: The 2022 Conference on Artificial Life, volume ALIFE 2018: The 2018 Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 15–22 (2018)

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Penty and G

    A. Penty and G. Tufte, Evolving Artificial Spin Ice for Robust Computation,Int. Journ. of Unconventional Computing18, 323–341 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Sacchi, N

    M. Sacchi, N. Jaouen, H. Popescu, R. Gaudemer, J. M. T onnerre, S. G. Chiuzbaian, C. F . Hague, A. Delmotte, J. M. Dubuisson, G. Cauchon, B. Lagarde, and F . Polack, The SEXT ANTS beamline at SOLEIL: a new facility for elastic, inelastic and coherent scattering of soft X-rays,Journal of Physics: Conference series 425, 72018 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Björck and G

    M. Björck and G. Andersson, GenX: an extensible X-ray reflectivity refinement program utilizing differential evolution,Journal of Applied Crystallography40, 1174–1178 (2007). 19

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    Glavic and M

    A. Glavic and M. Björck, GenX 3: the latest generation of an established tool,Journal of Applied Crystallography55, 1063–1071 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Aballe, M

    L. Aballe, M. Foerster, E. Pellegrin, J. Nicolas, and S. Ferrer, The ALBA spectroscopic LEEM-PEEM experimental station: layout and performance,Journal of Synchrotron Radiation22, 745–752 (2015). Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Johan Oscarsson and Mauricio Sortica at the Uppsala T andem Laboratory for help with ion implantations. The author...

    work page doi:10.5291/ill-da 2015