Giant Nonlinear Photon-Drag Currents in Moir\'e Bilayers

Hua Wang; Kai Chang; Likun Shi; Shi Liu; Zhichao Guo; Zhuang Qian; Zhuocheng Lu

arxiv: 2511.16987 · v2 · pith:43MJT3Z3new · submitted 2025-11-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Giant Nonlinear Photon-Drag Currents in Moir\'e Bilayers

Zhuocheng Lu , Zhuang Qian , Zhichao Guo , Likun Shi , Shi Liu , Hua Wang , Kai Chang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords nonlinear photon-dragmoiré bilayerstwisted bilayer graphenebulk photovoltaic effectquantum geometryphotocurrentsoptical responsetwist angle

0 comments

The pith

Finite in-plane photon momentum generates giant tunable nonlinear photon-drag currents in twisted bilayer graphene that rival standard photovoltaic responses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a geometric-loop framework for nonlinear photon-drag currents that supplies both a quantum-geometric interpretation and practical numerics for real moiré systems. When applied to twisted bilayer graphene, the approach shows that even modest in-plane photon momentum produces large photocurrents whose magnitude matches the largest reported bulk photovoltaic currents in two-dimensional materials. These currents vary strongly with photon wavevector, bilayer twist angle, and light polarization. The method removes the crystal-symmetry barriers that normally forbid or restrict such nonlinear responses, opening a route to momentum-dependent light-to-current conversion in moiré bilayers.

Core claim

We develop a unified microscopic theory of nonlinear photon-drag currents formulated within a geometric-loop framework, providing both a transparent quantum-geometric interpretation and numerical tractability. Applying this formalism to twisted bilayer graphene (TBG), we demonstrate that a finite, in-plane photon momentum can trigger massive nonlinear responses, rivaling the giant photovoltaic currents reported in typical 2D materials. These currents exhibit high tunability via photon wavevector, twist angle, and light polarization.

What carries the argument

The geometric-loop framework, which formulates nonlinear photon-drag currents with a quantum-geometric interpretation and supplies numerical tractability for realistic moiré bilayers such as twisted bilayer graphene.

If this is right

Nonlinear photon-drag currents become accessible in moiré materials where conventional bulk photovoltaic currents are symmetry-forbidden.
The currents can be tuned continuously by changing photon wavevector, twist angle, or polarization.
The framework extends momentum-dependent light-matter calculations beyond toy models to realistic twisted bilayer systems.
Nonlinear photon-drag provides an optoelectronic mechanism that operates outside the limits of the conventional bulk photovoltaic effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same geometric-loop method could be applied directly to other moiré heterostructures such as twisted transition-metal dichalcogenide bilayers to predict analogous momentum-driven currents.
Device experiments that vary the angle of light incidence while monitoring in-plane current direction would provide a direct test of the predicted tunability with photon wavevector.
If the tunability holds, the effect could be combined with existing moiré band-engineering techniques to design polarization- or angle-selective photodetectors.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric-loop framework supplies both a clear quantum-geometric picture and workable numerics when used on actual moiré materials like twisted bilayer graphene.

What would settle it

A measurement of nonlinear photocurrent in a fabricated twisted bilayer graphene device under controlled variation of photon incidence angle that shows currents remain small and independent of momentum would falsify the predicted giant responses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16987 by Hua Wang, Kai Chang, Likun Shi, Shi Liu, Zhichao Guo, Zhuang Qian, Zhuocheng Lu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Photon-drag photoconductivity of centrosymmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Influence of inversion symmetry breaking on photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The bulk photovoltaic effect provides a fundamental pathway for direct light-to-current conversion in quantum materials. However, these nonlinear currents are often strictly constrained or forbidden by crystal symmetries, hindering their exploration in a broader range of materials. While the nonlinear photon-drag effect leverages finite photon momentum to circumvent these constraints, its investigation has been largely confined to toy models, lacking a robust numerical framework for realistic materials. Here, we develop a unified microscopic theory of nonlinear photon-drag currents formulated within a geometric-loop framework, providing both a transparent quantum-geometric interpretation and numerical tractability. Applying this formalism to twisted bilayer graphene (TBG), we demonstrate that a finite, in-plane photon momentum can trigger massive nonlinear responses, rivaling the giant photovoltaic currents reported in typical 2D materials. These currents exhibit high tunability via photon wavevector, twist angle, and light polarization. Our work not only provides a generalized framework for momentum-dependent light-matter interactions but also establishes the nonlinear photon-drag effect as a potent mechanism for unlocking unprecedented optoelectronic functionalities beyond the limitations of the conventional bulk photovoltaic effect.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a geometric-loop formalism for computing nonlinear photon-drag currents in moiré systems and applies it to TBG to get large, tunable in-plane responses.

read the letter

The core advance is a unified microscopic theory for the nonlinear photon-drag effect that works on realistic moiré band structures instead of toy models. They frame it with a geometric-loop approach that ties the current to quantum geometry and claim it stays numerically tractable for twisted bilayer graphene. That lets them show finite in-plane photon momentum producing currents that rival known giant photovoltaic responses, with clear dependence on twist angle, polarization, and wavevector. The symmetry-breaking role of photon momentum is handled cleanly, which is the practical payoff for optoelectronics where crystal symmetry normally forbids these terms. The calculations appear to rest on standard tight-binding inputs for TBG plus the new loop formalism, with no obvious free parameters added beyond the usual moiré setup. The main soft spot is that the size of the effect still needs to be checked against full numerical convergence and against any approximations that might suppress the small-k photon contribution; the abstract language is strong, but the actual magnitude and robustness will determine how much weight the result carries. Minor concern is whether the geometric interpretation adds new predictive power beyond what a direct Kubo-style calculation would give. This is aimed at the 2D materials and nonlinear optics crowd; anyone modeling photocurrents in twisted bilayers or looking for symmetry-unconstrained responses will find the framework worth testing. It deserves a serious referee because the claim is concrete, the method is new, and the application is to a material people actually fabricate.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified microscopic theory of nonlinear photon-drag currents formulated within a geometric-loop framework. This provides a quantum-geometric interpretation and numerical tractability for momentum-dependent nonlinear responses. When applied to twisted bilayer graphene, the theory predicts that finite in-plane photon momentum triggers giant, highly tunable nonlinear currents that rival known photovoltaic effects in 2D materials, with tunability arising from photon wavevector, twist angle, and light polarization.

Significance. If the central derivations and numerical results hold, the work supplies a general framework for momentum-dependent light-matter interactions that circumvents symmetry constraints of the conventional bulk photovoltaic effect. It establishes the nonlinear photon-drag effect as a viable mechanism in realistic moiré systems and offers both interpretive clarity via quantum geometry and practical computational access, which could guide experimental exploration of optoelectronic functionalities in twisted bilayers.

minor comments (2)

Ensure that the geometric-loop construction is explicitly contrasted with prior photon-drag formulations in the introduction or methods section so that the claimed unification and tractability gains are immediately clear to readers familiar with the literature.
Figure captions and axis labels should include explicit statements of the photon momentum magnitude (in units of the moiré reciprocal lattice vector) and the twist-angle range used, to make the tunability claims quantitatively reproducible from the plots alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and significance assessment of our work developing a geometric-loop framework for nonlinear photon-drag currents in moiré systems. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. However, the report contains no specific major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents a new unified microscopic theory of nonlinear photon-drag currents within a geometric-loop framework, then applies it to TBG to obtain giant tunable responses. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or renamed inputs; the derivation chain is self-contained as an original theoretical construction with independent numerical tractability claimed for realistic moiré systems. Absent any quoted equations or citations that collapse the central result to its own inputs, the work does not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters or invented entities; the geometric-loop framework itself is treated as a domain assumption.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The geometric-loop framework supplies both quantum-geometric interpretation and numerical tractability for realistic moiré bilayers.
Invoked in the abstract as the basis for the unified theory and its application to TBG.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5736 in / 1055 out tokens · 19759 ms · 2026-05-25T08:02:06.123591+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking matches

?

matches
MATCHES: this paper passage directly uses, restates, or depends on the cited Recognition theorem or module.

the photon-drag shift-current photoconductivity ... is the dipole moment of the geometric loop ... σ^abc_SC = C Σ J_αβ(ω) (ˆD_p L^abc_βα(p) − ˆD_p L^acb_αβ(p))
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArrowOfTime.lean forward_accumulates matches

?

matches
MATCHES: this paper passage directly uses, restates, or depends on the cited Recognition theorem or module.

the photon-drag injection-current photoconductivity ... is captured by L^abc_βα(p), weighted by the velocity difference between the conduction and valence bands

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

[1]

Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys

P. Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys. Rev. B83, 035309 (2011)

work page 2011
[2]

Morimoto and N

T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of non- linear optical effects in solids, Sci. Adv.2, e1501524 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

de Juan, A

F. de Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in weyl semimetals, Nat. Commun.8, 15995 (2017)

work page 2017
[4]

Rangel, B

T. Rangel, B. M. Fregoso, B. S. Mendoza, T. Mori- moto, J. E. Moore, and J. B. Neaton, Large bulk photo- voltaic effect and spontaneous polarization of single-layer monochalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 067402 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Wang and X

H. Wang and X. Qian, Electrically and magnetically switchable nonlinear photocurrent in pt-symmetric mag- netictopologicalquantummaterials,npjComput.Mater. 6, 199 (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

Ahn, G.-Y

J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X10, 041041 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

Ahn, G.-Y

J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nat. Phys.18, 290 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

Chaudhary, C

S. Chaudhary, C. Lewandowski, and G. Refael, Shift- current response as a probe of quantum geometry and electron-electroninteractionsintwistedbilayergraphene, Phys. Rev. Research4, 013164 (2022)

work page 2022
[9]

Resta, Geometrical theory of the shift current in pres- ence of disorder and interaction, Phys

R. Resta, Geometrical theory of the shift current in pres- ence of disorder and interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206903 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Sivianes, F

J. Sivianes, F. J. D. Santos, and J. Ibañez-Azpiroz, Opti- cal signatures of spin symmetries in unconventional mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196907 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

Avdoshkin, J

A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, Multi- state geometry of shift current and polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066901 (2025)

work page 2025
[12]

Z. Ji, G. Liu, Z. Addison, W. Liu, P. Yu, H. Gao, Z. Liu, A. M. Rappe, C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, and R. Agarwal, Spatiallydispersivecircularphotogalvaniceffectinaweyl semimetal, Nat. Mater.18, 955 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

H. J. Lezec, A. Degiron, E. Devaux, R. A. Linke, L. Martin-Moreno, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Beaming light from a subwavelength aperture, Sci- ence297, 820 (2002)

work page 2002
[14]

D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. García De Abajo, Polaritons in van der waals materials, Science354, aag1992 (2016)

work page 2016
[15]

Kurman, N

Y. Kurman, N. Rivera, T. Christensen, S. Tsesses, M. Orenstein, M. Soljačić, J. D. Joannopoulos, and I. Kaminer, Control of semiconductor emitter frequency by increasing polariton momenta, Nature Photon12, 423 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

L.-k. Shi, D. Zhang, K. Chang, and J. C. W. Song, Geo- metric photon-drag effect and nonlinear shift current in centrosymmetric crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 197402 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Xie and N

Y.-M. Xie and N. Nagaosa, Photon-drag photovoltaic ef- fects and quantum geometric nature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2424294122 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

work page 2018
[19]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Unconventionalsuper- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature574, 653 (2019)

work page 2019
[21]

Watanabe, T

M.Serlin, C.L.Tschirhart, H.Polshyn, Y.Zhang, J.Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moiré het- erostructure, Science367, 900 (2020)

work page 2020
[22]

Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 439 (2021)

work page 2021
[23]

Stepanov, M

P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Competing zero-field chern insulators in superconducting twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 197701 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Zhang, D

Y.-H. Zhang, D. Mao, and T. Senthil, Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anoma- lous hall effect and a lattice model, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033126 (2019)

work page 2019
[25]

Abouelkomsan, Z

A. Abouelkomsan, Z. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Particle- hole duality, emergent fermi liquids, and fractional chern insulators in moiré flatbands, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 106803 (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

See Sec. A, Sec. B and Sec. C of the Supplemental Ma- terial for a detailed derivation of nonlinear photon-drag photoconductivity

work page
[27]

D of the Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation of geometric-loop formalism

See Sec. D of the Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation of geometric-loop formalism

work page
[28]

E of the Supplemental Material for a detailed symmetry analysis of nonlinear photon-drag photocon- ductivity

See Sec. E of the Supplemental Material for a detailed symmetry analysis of nonlinear photon-drag photocon- ductivity

work page
[29]

S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact con- tinuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted 6 bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Research1, 013001 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

Bistritzer and A

R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 12233 (2011)

work page 2011
[31]

Band structures for three different twist angles are pro- vided in the Supplemental Material, Sec. F

work page
[32]

R. Fei, W. Song, and L. Yang, Giant photogalvanic ef- fect and second-harmonic generation in magnetic axion insulators, Phys. Rev. B102, 035440 (2020)

work page 2020
[33]

H. Xu, H. Wang, J. Zhou, and J. Li, Pure spin photocur- rent in non-centrosymmetric crystals: Bulk spin photo- voltaic effect, Nat Commun12, 4330 (2021)

work page 2021
[34]

S. Carr, S. Fang, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and E. Kaxi- ras, Derivation of wannier orbitals and minimal-basis tight-binding hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene: First-principles approach, Phys. Rev. Research1, 033072 (2019)

work page 2019
[35]

Band structures for centrosymmetric and noncentrosym- metric TBG are provided in the Supplemental Material, Sec. F

work page
[36]

H. Wang, X. Tang, H. Xu, J. Li, and X. Qian, Gen- eralized wilson loop method for nonlinear light-matter interaction, npj Quantum Mater.7, 61 (2022). 7 Supplementary Material A. Density matrix theory for inhomogeous optical electric field 7 B. Photon-drag injection current 8 C. Photon-drag shift current 9 D. Geometric-loop formalism for photon-drag shift ...

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys

P. Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insulator surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Phys. Rev. B83, 035309 (2011)

work page 2011

[2] [2]

Morimoto and N

T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of non- linear optical effects in solids, Sci. Adv.2, e1501524 (2016)

work page 2016

[3] [3]

de Juan, A

F. de Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in weyl semimetals, Nat. Commun.8, 15995 (2017)

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Rangel, B

T. Rangel, B. M. Fregoso, B. S. Mendoza, T. Mori- moto, J. E. Moore, and J. B. Neaton, Large bulk photo- voltaic effect and spontaneous polarization of single-layer monochalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 067402 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Wang and X

H. Wang and X. Qian, Electrically and magnetically switchable nonlinear photocurrent in pt-symmetric mag- netictopologicalquantummaterials,npjComput.Mater. 6, 199 (2020)

work page 2020

[6] [6]

Ahn, G.-Y

J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. X10, 041041 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Ahn, G.-Y

J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nat. Phys.18, 290 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Chaudhary, C

S. Chaudhary, C. Lewandowski, and G. Refael, Shift- current response as a probe of quantum geometry and electron-electroninteractionsintwistedbilayergraphene, Phys. Rev. Research4, 013164 (2022)

work page 2022

[9] [9]

Resta, Geometrical theory of the shift current in pres- ence of disorder and interaction, Phys

R. Resta, Geometrical theory of the shift current in pres- ence of disorder and interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206903 (2024)

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Sivianes, F

J. Sivianes, F. J. D. Santos, and J. Ibañez-Azpiroz, Opti- cal signatures of spin symmetries in unconventional mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196907 (2025)

work page 2025

[11] [11]

Avdoshkin, J

A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, Multi- state geometry of shift current and polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066901 (2025)

work page 2025

[12] [12]

Z. Ji, G. Liu, Z. Addison, W. Liu, P. Yu, H. Gao, Z. Liu, A. M. Rappe, C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, and R. Agarwal, Spatiallydispersivecircularphotogalvaniceffectinaweyl semimetal, Nat. Mater.18, 955 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

H. J. Lezec, A. Degiron, E. Devaux, R. A. Linke, L. Martin-Moreno, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Beaming light from a subwavelength aperture, Sci- ence297, 820 (2002)

work page 2002

[14] [14]

D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. García De Abajo, Polaritons in van der waals materials, Science354, aag1992 (2016)

work page 2016

[15] [15]

Kurman, N

Y. Kurman, N. Rivera, T. Christensen, S. Tsesses, M. Orenstein, M. Soljačić, J. D. Joannopoulos, and I. Kaminer, Control of semiconductor emitter frequency by increasing polariton momenta, Nature Photon12, 423 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

L.-k. Shi, D. Zhang, K. Chang, and J. C. W. Song, Geo- metric photon-drag effect and nonlinear shift current in centrosymmetric crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 197402 (2021)

work page 2021

[17] [17]

Xie and N

Y.-M. Xie and N. Nagaosa, Photon-drag photovoltaic ef- fects and quantum geometric nature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2424294122 (2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

work page 2018

[19] [19]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Unconventionalsuper- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

work page 2018

[20] [20]

X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature574, 653 (2019)

work page 2019

[21] [21]

Watanabe, T

M.Serlin, C.L.Tschirhart, H.Polshyn, Y.Zhang, J.Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moiré het- erostructure, Science367, 900 (2020)

work page 2020

[22] [22]

Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 439 (2021)

work page 2021

[23] [23]

Stepanov, M

P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Competing zero-field chern insulators in superconducting twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 197701 (2021)

work page 2021

[24] [24]

Zhang, D

Y.-H. Zhang, D. Mao, and T. Senthil, Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anoma- lous hall effect and a lattice model, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033126 (2019)

work page 2019

[25] [25]

Abouelkomsan, Z

A. Abouelkomsan, Z. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Particle- hole duality, emergent fermi liquids, and fractional chern insulators in moiré flatbands, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 106803 (2020)

work page 2020

[26] [26]

See Sec. A, Sec. B and Sec. C of the Supplemental Ma- terial for a detailed derivation of nonlinear photon-drag photoconductivity

work page

[27] [27]

D of the Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation of geometric-loop formalism

See Sec. D of the Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation of geometric-loop formalism

work page

[28] [28]

E of the Supplemental Material for a detailed symmetry analysis of nonlinear photon-drag photocon- ductivity

See Sec. E of the Supplemental Material for a detailed symmetry analysis of nonlinear photon-drag photocon- ductivity

work page

[29] [29]

S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact con- tinuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted 6 bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Research1, 013001 (2019)

work page 2019

[30] [30]

Bistritzer and A

R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 12233 (2011)

work page 2011

[31] [31]

Band structures for three different twist angles are pro- vided in the Supplemental Material, Sec. F

work page

[32] [32]

R. Fei, W. Song, and L. Yang, Giant photogalvanic ef- fect and second-harmonic generation in magnetic axion insulators, Phys. Rev. B102, 035440 (2020)

work page 2020

[33] [33]

H. Xu, H. Wang, J. Zhou, and J. Li, Pure spin photocur- rent in non-centrosymmetric crystals: Bulk spin photo- voltaic effect, Nat Commun12, 4330 (2021)

work page 2021

[34] [34]

S. Carr, S. Fang, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and E. Kaxi- ras, Derivation of wannier orbitals and minimal-basis tight-binding hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene: First-principles approach, Phys. Rev. Research1, 033072 (2019)

work page 2019

[35] [35]

Band structures for centrosymmetric and noncentrosym- metric TBG are provided in the Supplemental Material, Sec. F

work page

[36] [36]

H. Wang, X. Tang, H. Xu, J. Li, and X. Qian, Gen- eralized wilson loop method for nonlinear light-matter interaction, npj Quantum Mater.7, 61 (2022). 7 Supplementary Material A. Density matrix theory for inhomogeous optical electric field 7 B. Photon-drag injection current 8 C. Photon-drag shift current 9 D. Geometric-loop formalism for photon-drag shift ...

work page 2022