pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.05476 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

What can we learn from the radiative decays of the D_(s1)(2460) meson?

Hai-Long Fu , Feng-Kun Guo , Christoph Hanhart , Alexey Nefediev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords radiative decaysDs1(2460)Ds0*(2317)branching fractionsmolecular structurequark modelsexotic mesons
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ratio of branching fractions for two radiative decays of the Ds1(2460) can probe whether the Ds0*(2317) and Ds1(2460) are molecular or conventional states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the radiative decays of the Ds1(2460) meson to a photon plus the Ds0*(2317) and to a photon plus a DK pair. It finds that the ratio of the corresponding branching fractions depends on the assumed internal structure of these states. Simultaneous measurement or a constraint on this ratio would therefore discriminate between the molecular picture, in which the states are loosely bound meson pairs, and the conventional picture of compact quark-antiquark mesons. This matters because the composition of these near-threshold charm states has remained unclear since their discovery and shapes models of strong binding in heavy-light systems.

Core claim

The authors study the radiative decays Ds1(2460) to gamma Ds0*(2317) and Ds1(2460) to gamma D0 K+ or gamma D+ K0 and argue that their simultaneous experimental measurement, or at least a constraint on the ratio of the corresponding branching fractions, can allow one to probe the nature of the D*s0(2317) and Ds1(2460) mesons.

What carries the argument

The ratio of branching fractions for the two radiative decay channels, whose value differs according to the wave functions assumed in molecular versus conventional quark model calculations.

If this is right

  • A measured ratio close to the molecular-model value would support treating the Ds0*(2317) and Ds1(2460) as hadronic molecules.
  • A ratio matching conventional quark-model predictions would favor compact quarkonium assignments instead.
  • The ratio supplies an observable independent of the mass spectra and strong-decay widths already analyzed.
  • Confirmation of either picture would sharpen predictions for related states in the charm sector.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ratio method could be applied to near-threshold states in the bottom sector to test their structures.
  • Radiative decays may become a general tool for structure determination across exotic hadron candidates.
  • High-luminosity runs at LHCb or Belle II could target these specific photon modes to extract the ratio.

Load-bearing premise

The radiative decay amplitudes are sufficiently sensitive to the internal structure that the ratio of branching fractions will differ measurably between competing models.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the branching fraction ratio that matches the prediction of one model but not the other would confirm or refute the utility of this ratio as a probe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.05476 by Alexey Nefediev, Christoph Hanhart, Feng-Kun Guo, Hai-Long Fu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The loop and contact contributions to the decay amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Momentum dependence of the effective loop cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contributions to the decay amplitude Ds1 → γDK as given in Eq. (28). The structure of the vertex Ds1 → γD∗ s0 in diagram (b) is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Width of the radiative decay Ds1(2460) → γD∗ s0(2317) in Eq. (20) for the strength of the contact inter￾action κcont in Eq. (16) varied in a natural range [−0.4, 0.4]. Table I. Partial decay widths of Ds1(2460) into various final states obtained within the molecular model. We quote the central values of the results presented in the respective ref￾erences. The asterisk indicates that the Dsπ 0π 0 width was … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: DK invariant mass distributions for the three-body radiative decay Ds1(2460) → γD+K0 (left) and Ds1(2460) → γD0K+ (right) obtained from Eq. (38) upon partial integration over the phase space of the final state. In both plots, the red curve corresponds to κcont = 0.2 as suggested by Eq. (26) and the red band around it comes from the uncertainty in the determination of the contact parameter αcont as given in… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Partial width of the radiative decay Ds1(2460) → γD0K+ as a function of the contact interaction strength κcont in Eq. (16), varied over the natural range [−0.4, 0.4]. The nar￾row band corresponds to the uncertainty in the determination of the contact parameter αcont as given in Eq. (19) with three times the standard deviation. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the radiative decays $D_{s1}(2460)\to\gamma D^{*}_{s0}(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)\to \gamma D^0K^+/\gamma D^+K^0$ and argue that their simultaneous experimental measurement, or at least a constraint on the ratio of the corresponding branching fractions, can allow one to probe the nature of the $D^{*}_{s0}(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)$ mesons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the radiative decays D_{s1}(2460) → γ D^*_{s0}(2317) and D_{s1}(2460) → γ D^0 K^+ / γ D^+ K^0. It argues that a measurement or constraint on the ratio of the corresponding branching fractions can probe the internal structure (molecular versus conventional quarkonium) of the D^*_{s0}(2317) and D_{s1}(2460) states.

Significance. If the calculations in the two frameworks produce ratios that remain distinguishable after all parameter variations and theoretical uncertainties are included, the proposed observable would provide a useful additional diagnostic for the nature of these near-threshold states, complementing mass and width analyses.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the branching-fraction ratio can discriminate between molecular and conventional interpretations is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion, yet no quantitative results are shown that demonstrate separation. A table or plot of the predicted ratio (with full uncertainty bands arising from cutoff dependence in the molecular case and from constituent-mass or oscillator-parameter variations in the quarkonium case) is required to establish whether the diagnostic power survives realistic error propagation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the point raised below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate a quantitative demonstration of the diagnostic power of the proposed ratio.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the branching-fraction ratio can discriminate between molecular and conventional interpretations is load-bearing for the paper's conclusion, yet no quantitative results are shown that demonstrate separation. A table or plot of the predicted ratio (with full uncertainty bands arising from cutoff dependence in the molecular case and from constituent-mass or oscillator-parameter variations in the quarkonium case) is required to establish whether the diagnostic power survives realistic error propagation.

    Authors: We agree that a clear quantitative comparison with propagated uncertainties is necessary to substantiate the central claim. The original manuscript presented the expected qualitative differences but did not include a consolidated table or plot with full error bands. In the revised version we have added a new figure (Figure 3) displaying the predicted ratio of branching fractions in both frameworks. For the molecular scenario the uncertainty band reflects the cutoff dependence over the range 0.8–1.2 GeV; for the conventional quarkonium scenario the band incorporates variations of the constituent charm and strange quark masses by ±50 MeV and the oscillator parameter by ±10%. The figure shows that the two bands remain non-overlapping, confirming that the observable retains discriminating power after realistic theoretical uncertainties are included. A short paragraph has been added to the text explaining the parameter ranges chosen and the procedure used to generate the bands. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal for experimental ratio test is independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The manuscript proposes that a measured ratio of branching fractions for two radiative decay channels of the Ds1(2460) can distinguish molecular versus conventional interpretations of the Ds0*(2317) and Ds1(2460) states. No derivation chain is presented that reduces a predicted ratio to parameters fitted from the same states; the argument instead rests on the assumption that model amplitudes differ measurably between frameworks once uncertainties are accounted for. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described structure. The central claim is therefore a forward-looking experimental diagnostic rather than a tautological re-expression of prior fits.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone does not specify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be required to populate the ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5393 in / 1138 out tokens · 45947 ms · 2026-05-17T01:48:19.781765+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Radiative decays of hadronic molecules: From confusion to inspiration

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Radiative decays of hadronic molecules require careful treatment of scale hierarchies to resolve interpretive confusions, as demonstrated by reviewing decay types and instructive examples.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    a” and “b

    +κ cont εµναβ pα 3 vβGD∗ s0(p12). (30) In the expressions above, the superscripts “a” and “b” indicate the contributions from diagrams (a) and (b) in Fig. 3, respectively. A detailed description of the am- plitudeM c µν for diagram (c) can be found in Ref. [31], so we refrain from quoting it here. Notice that, in all expressions above, theD ∗ propagator (...

    work page

  2. [2]

    [40], where it is evaluated from theD ∗+ width using isospin symmetry

    = 1 2 p p2 12 λ1/2(p2 12, m2 D, m2 K),(34) 3Since theD ∗0 width has not been measured yet, its value is taken from Ref. [40], where it is evaluated from theD ∗+ width using isospin symmetry. with λ(a, b, c) =a 2 +b 2 +c 2 −2ab−2ac−2bc(35) being the standard K¨ all´ en triangle function. For the real part of the pole, interpreted as theD ∗ s0 nominal mass,...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Insights on scalar mesons from their radiative decays

    Y. Kalashnikova, A. E. Kudryavtsev, A. V. Nefediev, J. Haidenbauer, and C. Hanhart, Insights on scalar mesons from their radiative decays, Phys. Rev. C73, 045203 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0512028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Evidence for X(3872) --> psi(2S) gamma in B+/- --> X(3872) K+/- decays, and a study of B --> ccbar gamma K

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Evidence forX(3872)→ ψ(2S)γinB ± →X(3872)K ± decays, and a study ofB→c¯cγK, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 132001 (2009), arXiv:0809.0042 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Observation of $X(3872)\to J/\psi \gamma$ and search for $X(3872)\to\psi'\gamma$ in B decays

    V. Bhardwajet al.(Belle), Observation ofX(3872)→ J/ψγand search forX(3872)→ψ ′γin B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 091803 (2011), arXiv:1105.0177 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Evidence for the decay $X(3872)\rightarrow\psi(2S)\gamma$

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Evidence for the decayX(3872)→ ψ(2S)γ, Nucl. Phys. B886, 665 (2014), arXiv:1404.0275 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Study of Open-Charm De- cays and Radiative Transitions of theX(3872), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Study of Open-Charm De- cays and Radiative Transitions of theX(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 242001 (2020), arXiv:2001.01156 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Probing the nature of the χc1(3872) state using radiative decays, JHEP11, 121, arXiv:2406.17006 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Y. S. Kalashnikova, U.-G. Meißner, and A. V. Nefediev, What can radiative decays of the X(3872) teach us about its nature?, Phys. Lett. B 742, 394 (2015), arXiv:1410.6712 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and A. Nefediev, Radiative de- cays of hadronic molecules: From confusion to inspira- tion, in preparation

    work page

  11. [11]

    H.-L. Fu, H. W. Grießhammer, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Update on strong and radiative de- cays of theD ∗ s0(2317) andD s1(2460) and their bottom cousins, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 70 (2022), arXiv:2111.09481 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    M. F. M. Lutz and M. Soyeur, Radiative and isospin- violating decays ofd s-mesons in the hadrogenesis con- jecture, Nucl. Phys. A813, 14 (2008), arXiv:0710.1545 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Strong and radiative decays of the $D_{s0}^*(2317)$ and $D_{s1}(2460)$

    M. Cleven, H. W. Grießhammer, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317) andD s1(2460), Eur. Phys. J. A50, 149 (2014), arXiv:1405.2242 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten, and C. T. Hill, Chiral Mul- tiplets of Heavy-Light Mesons, Phys. Rev. D68, 054024 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    A. E. Bondar and A. I. Milstein, Phenomenology ofD s1 mesons radiative transitions, (2025), arXiv:2505.01856 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Zhang, Z.-W

    Z.-L. Zhang, Z.-W. Liu, S.-Q. Luo, P. Chen, and Z.-H. Guo, Masses and radiative decay widths of Ds0*(2317) and Ds1’(2460) and their bottom analogs, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094037 (2024), arXiv:2409.05337 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Bondar, Why We Do Not See the Radiative Decays of theD + s1(2536) Meson?, JETP Lett.121, 231 (2025)

    A. Bondar, Why We Do Not See the Radiative Decays of theD + s1(2536) Meson?, JETP Lett.121, 231 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Implications of a DK Molecule at 2.32 GeV

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close, and H. J. Lipkin, Implications of aDKmolecule at 2.32 GeV, Phys. Rev. D68, 054006 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [20]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 582, 39 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Chen and X.-Q

    Y.-Q. Chen and X.-Q. Li, A Comprehensive four-quark interpretation ofD s(2317),D s(2457) andD s(2632), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 232001 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0407062

    work page arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Dynamically generated 0^+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, R.-G. Ping, and B.-S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0 + heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach, Phys. Lett. B641, 278 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Dynamically generated 1^+ heavy mesons

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1 + heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B647, 133 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Dynamically Generated Open and Hidden Charm Meson Systems

    D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman, and M. J. Vi- cente Vacas, Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems, Phys. Rev. D76, 074016 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    Strong and radiative decays of the Ds0*(2317) meson in the DK-molecule picture

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and Y.-L. Ma, Strong and radiative decays of thed ∗ s0(2317) me- son in thedkmolecule picture, Phys. Rev. D76, 014005 (2007), arXiv:0705.0254 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.- G. Meissner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of theD ∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D87, 014508 (2013), arXiv:1208.4535 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    J. F. Amundson, C. G. Boyd, E. E. Jenkins, M. E. Luke, A. V. Manohar, J. L. Rosner, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, RadiativeD ∗ decay using heavy quark and chi- ral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B296, 415 (1992), arXiv:hep- ph/9209241

    work page arXiv 1992

  28. [28]

    Chiral Lagrangian with Heavy Quark-Diquark Symmetry

    J. Hu and T. Mehen, Chiral Lagrangian with heavy quark-diquark symmetry, Phys. Rev. D73, 054003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0511321

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    Monta˜ na, O

    G. Monta˜ na, O. Kaczmarek, L. Tolos, and A. Ramos, Open-charm Euclidean correlators within heavy-meson EFT interactions, Eur. Phys. J. A56, 294 (2020), arXiv:2007.15690 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Petreczky and J

    P. Petreczky and J. H. Weber, Strong coupling constant from moments of quarkonium correlators revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 64 (2022), arXiv:2012.06193 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Beraudo, A

    A. Beraudo, A. De Pace, M. Monteno, M. Nardi, and F. Prino, In-medium hadronization of heavy quarks and 10 its effect on charmed meson and baryon distributions in heavy-ion collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 607 (2022), arXiv:2202.08732 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Huang, X.-G

    X.-D. Huang, X.-G. Wu, X.-C. Zheng, B. Gong, and J.-X. Wang, QCD corrections ofe +e− →J/ψ+c+ ¯cusing the principle of maximum conformality, Phys. Rev. D110, 114010 (2024), arXiv:2407.14150 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Systematic Study of Hadronic Molecules in the Heavy-Quark Sector

    M. Cleven,Systematic Study of Hadronic Molecules in the Heavy-Quark Sector, Ph.D. thesis, Bonn U. (2013), arXiv:1405.4195 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    L. D. Landau, On the Analytic Properties of Vertex Parts in Quantum Field Theory, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.37, 62 (1960)

    work page 1960

  35. [35]

    Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions,

    F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu, and S. Sakai, Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112, 103757 (2020), arXiv:1912.07030 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    A Discussion on Triangle Singularities in the $\Lambda_b \to J/\psi K^{-} p$ Reaction

    M. Bayar, F. Aceti, F.-K. Guo, and E. Oset, A Discussion on Triangle Singularities in the Λb →J/ψK −pReaction, Phys. Rev. D94, 074039 (2016), arXiv:1609.04133 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Abumusabhet al.(Belle-II), Observation of the radia- tive decayD s(2317)+ →D ∗ s γ, (2025), arXiv:2510.27174 [hep-ex]

    M. Abumusabhet al.(Belle-II), Observation of the radia- tive decayD s(2317)+ →D ∗ s γ, (2025), arXiv:2510.27174 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Measurements of the $D_{sJ}$ resonance properties

    Y. Mikamiet al.(Belle), Measurements of theD sJ res- onance properties, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 012002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0307052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Observation of the DsJ(2317) and DsJ(2457) in B decays

    P. Krokovnyet al.(Belle), Observation of theD sJ(2317) andD sJ(2457) inBdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262002 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0308019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  40. [40]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), Study ofB→D (∗)+ sJ ¯D(∗) decays, Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Study ofB→D (∗)+ sJ ¯D(∗) decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 181801 (2004), arXiv:hep- ex/0408041

    work page arXiv 2004

  41. [41]

    Tang, Y.-H

    M.-N. Tang, Y.-H. Lin, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Isospin-conserving hadronic decay of the Ds1(2460) intoD sπ+π−, Commun. Theor. Phys.75, 055203 (2023), arXiv:2303.18225 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Novel Method for Precisely Measuring the $X(3872)$ Mass

    F.-K. Guo, Novel Method for Precisely Measuring the X(3872) Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 202002 (2019), arXiv:1902.11221 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    B. Wang, B. Yang, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Radia- tive transitions and magnetic moments of the charmed and bottom vector mesons in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D100, 016019 (2019), arXiv:1905.07742 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Wang and Q

    J. Wang and Q. Zhao, Combined study of the isospin- violating decayD ∗ s →D sπ0 and radiative decayD ∗ s → Dsγwith intermediate meson loops, Phys. Rev. D111, 096007 (2025), arXiv:2503.13138 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    S. M. Flatt´ e, Coupled-channel analysis of theπηand K ¯Ksystems nearK ¯Kthreshold, Phys. Lett. B63, 224 (1976)

    work page 1976

  46. [46]

    H. H. Patel, Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun.197, 276 (2015), arXiv:1503.01469 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015