arxiv: 2512.12083 · v3 · pith:MMLQUVCXnew · submitted 2025-12-12 · 💻 cs.CV

RePack then Refine: Efficient Diffusion Transformer with Vision Foundation Model

Guanfang Dong , Luke Schultz , Negar Hassanpour , Chao Gao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords diffusion transformersvision foundation modelsimage generationlatent compressiontraining efficiencyImageNetgenerative modeling

0 comments

The pith

Compressing VFM features to a low-dimensional manifold lets DiTs reach FID 1.82 on ImageNet in 64 epochs, then a refiner improves it to 1.65.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to show that raw high-dimensional features from vision foundation models contain useful semantics but also redundancy that slows down Diffusion Transformer training. By first projecting those features onto a compact manifold, a standard DiT can learn the generative task much faster. A final Latent-Guided Refiner then restores the high-frequency details that were lost in the compression. A sympathetic reader would care because this three-stage sequence promises high-quality image generation with far fewer training epochs and lower compute than current latent diffusion approaches. If the method works as described, it offers a practical way to leverage pre-trained semantic features without paying the full cost of their dimensionality.

Core claim

The central claim is that projecting high-dimensional VFM features onto a compact low-dimensional manifold filters redundancy while preserving essential structure, allowing a standard DiT to be trained efficiently on this compressed space; a subsequent Latent-Guided Refiner then restores high-frequency details, yielding an FID of 1.82 after 64 epochs on ImageNet-1K that further improves to 1.65 with the refiner and surpasses latest LDMs in convergence speed.

What carries the argument

The RePack module, which projects high-dimensional VFM features onto a compact low-dimensional manifold to remove redundancy while keeping structural information, followed by the Latent-Guided Refiner that uses the DiT latent to recover lost details.

If this is right

A standard DiT trained on the RePack-compressed space converges to competitive FID scores in far fewer epochs than typical LDM training.
The Latent-Guided Refiner successfully restores high-frequency image details that were discarded during the initial compression.
The overall pipeline achieves better convergence efficiency than recent latent diffusion models on ImageNet-1K while maintaining generative quality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same packing-then-refine pattern could be tested on other generative architectures that currently struggle with high-dimensional conditioning inputs.
Early dimensionality reduction might allow scaling DiT models to larger sizes under fixed compute budgets by shortening the main training phase.
The staged separation suggests a broader design principle for diffusion models: handle semantic compression first and detail restoration second.

Load-bearing premise

The projection step must retain enough structural information from the original VFM features that a later refiner can recover the missing high-frequency details without creating artifacts or needing long retraining.

What would settle it

Training the same DiT directly on uncompressed VFM features would require many more than 64 epochs to reach an FID near 1.82, or generated images without the refiner would show persistent high-frequency artifacts or reduced fidelity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.12083 by Chao Gao, Guanfang Dong, Luke Schultz, Negar Hassanpour.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FID-50K vs. Training Epochs on ImageNet 256 × 256. RePack achieves strong image generation quality with fewer training epochs. Baseline results are adapted from RAE (Zheng et al., 2025). Notably, RePack exhibits a clear drop in FID at 42 epochs, which is attributed to a scheduled learning rate decay. We find that stage-wise learning rate decay leads to lower FID than using a standard learning rate schedule… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Design Philosophy of RePack. We project high-dimensional raw VFM features (768 channels) into a compact RePack feature space (32 channels). The bottom schematic illustrates learning difficulties: a redundant high-dimensional space leads to slower convergence (red path), while a lower-dimensional semantic space provides a smoother optimization path that enables efficient learning (blue path). ample, when u… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Analysis of Representation Redundancy. We perform PCA on features extracted by DINOv3. The cumulative explained variance curve reveals a significant long-tail distribution. Notably, a distinct Elbow Point appears around dimension 32, where the curve begins to flatten. where (h, w) = (H/p, W/p), p is the patch size, and D is the embedding dimension. For a standard ViT-B/16 model, D = 768 and p = 16. By cal… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The RePack then Refine Framework. The pipeline consists of three stages: (1) Representation Packing: Raw VFM features are projected into a compact semantic manifold and reconstructed by the RePack Decoder. (2) Generative Modeling: A DiT learns the velocity field over the packed latents. (3) Latent-Guided Refinement: A U-Net Refiner restores details using the reconstructed image and upscaled latents. The bo… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Qualitative Results on ImageNet 256 × 256 after 64 Training Epochs. Samples generated by RePack-DiT-XL/1 equipped with the Latent-Guided Refiner. by default. Comprehensive details regarding model architecture, loss configurations, and additional experimental settings are provided in Appendix A and C. 4.2. Efficiency and Quality Comparison on Image Generation Overall Results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Visual analysis of latent representations. Left: Input images. Middle: PCA visualizations of latents from a Standard VAE (trained w/o VFM guidance), VA-VAE, and RePack. Right: Spectral decomposition of VA-VAE and RePack latents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Extended Generated Samples (64 Epochs). Samples generated by RePack-DiT-XL/1 + Refiner on ImageNet 256 × 256. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Visualization of Training Progression. Samples generated by RePack-DiT-XL/1 at 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56 and 64 epochs. The model exhibits rapid convergence, forming stable semantic structures at a very early stage. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Extended Visual Analysis of Latent Representations. Complementing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Semantic-rich features from Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) have been leveraged to enhance Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs). However, raw VFM features are typically high-dimensional and redundant, increasing the difficulty of learning and reducing training efficiency for Diffusion Transformers (DiTs). In this paper, we propose Repack then Refine, a three-stage framework that brings the semantic-rich VFM features to DiT while further accelerating learning efficiency. Specifically, the RePack module projects the high-dimensional features onto a compact, low-dimensional manifold. This filters out the redundancy while preserving essential structural information. A standard DiT is then trained for generative modeling on this highly compressed latent space. Finally, to restore the high-frequency details lost due to the compression in RePack, we propose a Latent-Guided Refiner, which is trained lastly for enhancing the image details. On ImageNet-1K, RePack-DiT-XL/1 achieves an FID of 1.82 in only 64 training epochs. With the Refiner module, performance further improves to an FID of 1.65, significantly surpassing latest LDMs in terms of convergence efficiency. Our results demonstrate that packing VFM features, followed by targeted refinement, is a highly effective strategy for balancing generative fidelity with training efficiency. Source code is publicly available at https://github.com/guanfangdong/RePack-then-Refine.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

RePack-Refine gives a workable three-stage route to faster DiT convergence on VFM features, but the projection step's information retention still needs tighter evidence.

read the letter

The main point is a three-stage pipeline that compresses high-dimensional VFM features into a compact space for quicker DiT training, then adds a separate refiner to restore details, and the reported ImageNet numbers show decent efficiency gains over standard LDMs. The RePack module projects the features onto a low-dimensional manifold to cut redundancy while keeping core structure, a plain DiT runs on that compressed space, and the Latent-Guided Refiner trains last to fix high-frequency content. This specific combination of projection plus targeted refinement is new as a packaged method, and they deliver concrete results: FID 1.82 after 64 epochs on the XL model, improving to 1.65 with the refiner. Public code is a clear positive for anyone wanting to verify the setup. The efficiency story holds up on the surface for people who already work with VFMs and want lower training costs. The soft spot is the untested assumption that the RePack projection keeps enough structural information so the refiner does not have to hallucinate missing details or introduce artifacts. The abstract gives no ablations on manifold dimension, no quantitative measure of information loss, and limited baseline comparisons or error bars, so the convergence advantage rests partly on that preservation claim. If the projection acts as a real bottleneck, the later stage might be doing more work than it appears. This paper is for researchers building practical generative models who care about training speed and already have access to VFMs. A reader focused on empirical efficiency tweaks would find the pipeline and numbers useful to try. It deserves a serious referee because the claims are specific, the code is available, and the central idea is straightforward enough to check in review.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a three-stage 'RePack then Refine' framework to improve training efficiency of Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) by incorporating features from Vision Foundation Models (VFMs). The RePack module compresses high-dimensional VFM features onto a compact low-dimensional manifold to remove redundancy while retaining structural information; a standard DiT is then trained for generative modeling in this latent space; finally, a Latent-Guided Refiner is trained to restore high-frequency details lost during compression. On ImageNet-1K, RePack-DiT-XL/1 reports FID 1.82 after 64 epochs, improving to 1.65 with the refiner, and claims faster convergence than recent LDMs. Public code is released.

Significance. If the compression preserves the information needed for high-fidelity generation and the refiner reliably restores details without artifacts, the approach could meaningfully reduce the training cost of DiT-scale models while leveraging semantic VFM features. The explicit release of source code supports reproducibility and allows direct verification of the efficiency claims.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that RePack-DiT-XL/1 reaches FID 1.82 in 64 epochs (and 1.65 with the refiner) and 'significantly surpassing latest LDMs' is presented without tabulated baseline FIDs, exact LDM variants, their training epochs, or error bars from multiple runs, leaving the magnitude of the efficiency gain difficult to evaluate.
[Abstract] Abstract: The central assumption that the RePack projection 'filters out the redundancy while preserving essential structural information' is load-bearing for the entire pipeline, yet no quantitative bound on information loss (e.g., reconstruction PSNR, feature similarity metrics, or ablation over manifold dimension) is supplied.
[Abstract] Abstract: The Latent-Guided Refiner is asserted to restore high-frequency details 'lost due to the compression in RePack' without introducing artifacts or requiring extensive additional training; the manuscript provides no qualitative examples, artifact metrics, or ablation isolating the refiner's contribution to support this restoration claim.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'latest LDMs' without naming the specific models or citing their papers, which would aid readers in locating the comparison points.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify and strengthen our claims regarding the efficiency and effectiveness of the RePack then Refine framework. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that RePack-DiT-XL/1 reaches FID 1.82 in 64 epochs (and 1.65 with the refiner) and 'significantly surpassing latest LDMs' is presented without tabulated baseline FIDs, exact LDM variants, their training epochs, or error bars from multiple runs, leaving the magnitude of the efficiency gain difficult to evaluate.

Authors: We agree that including a comparative table would make the efficiency gains more transparent. In the revised manuscript, we will add a table that lists the FID scores, training epochs, and model configurations for recent LDM baselines (e.g., LDM-8, LDM-4, and others from the literature). Since our reported results are from single training runs, which is standard practice in this field, we will note this explicitly; if feasible, we can include standard deviations from multiple seeds in the camera-ready version. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central assumption that the RePack projection 'filters out the redundancy while preserving essential structural information' is load-bearing for the entire pipeline, yet no quantitative bound on information loss (e.g., reconstruction PSNR, feature similarity metrics, or ablation over manifold dimension) is supplied.

Authors: We acknowledge this point and will strengthen the manuscript by adding quantitative evaluations of the RePack module. Specifically, we will report reconstruction PSNR between the original VFM features and the RePacked features, as well as cosine similarity metrics. Additionally, we will include an ablation study varying the manifold dimension to demonstrate the trade-off between compression and information preservation. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The Latent-Guided Refiner is asserted to restore high-frequency details 'lost due to the compression in RePack' without introducing artifacts or requiring extensive additional training; the manuscript provides no qualitative examples, artifact metrics, or ablation isolating the refiner's contribution to support this restoration claim.

Authors: To address this, we will include qualitative visualizations comparing images generated with and without the Refiner to illustrate the restoration of high-frequency details. We will also add quantitative metrics such as LPIPS to assess perceptual quality and artifact presence. Furthermore, an ablation study isolating the Refiner's contribution will be added to the experiments section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical results rest on independent ImageNet-1K measurements

full rationale

The paper introduces RePack projection and Latent-Guided Refiner as architectural components, then reports measured FID scores (1.82 and 1.65) after fixed training epochs on ImageNet-1K. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to derive these metrics from the method itself; the performance numbers are external experimental outcomes. The central claim therefore does not reduce to a self-definition or a prediction forced by the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The approach rests on standard diffusion model assumptions plus two newly introduced modules whose effectiveness is demonstrated empirically rather than derived from first principles.

axioms (1)

domain assumption VFM features contain semantic-rich information that benefits generative modeling when properly compressed
Invoked to justify the use of VFMs as input to the RePack stage.

invented entities (2)

RePack module no independent evidence
purpose: Projects high-dimensional VFM features onto a compact low-dimensional manifold
Newly proposed component for redundancy removal.
Latent-Guided Refiner no independent evidence
purpose: Restores high-frequency details lost during compression
Newly proposed component trained after the main DiT.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1318 out tokens · 47845 ms · 2026-05-16T22:21:53.674778+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

RePack module projects the high-dimensional features onto a compact, low-dimensional manifold. This filters out the redundancy while preserving essential structural information.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean alpha_pin_under_high_calibration unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

PCA on raw VFM features... elbow Point appears around dimension 32... first ~32 principal components account for ~77% of the total variance.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

What Matters for Diffusion-Friendly Latent Manifold? Prior-Aligned Autoencoders for Latent Diffusion
cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Prior-Aligned AutoEncoders shape latent manifolds with spatial coherence, local continuity, and global semantics to improve latent diffusion, achieving SOTA gFID 1.03 on ImageNet 256x256 with up to 13x faster convergence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

8 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Gao, S., Zhou, P., Cheng, M.-M., and Yan, S

doi: 10.1007/BF02288367. Gao, S., Zhou, P., Cheng, M.-M., and Yan, S. Masked diffusion transformer is a strong image synthesizer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 23164–23173, 2023. Gao, Y ., Chen, C., Chen, T., and Gu, J. One layer is enough: Adapting pretrained visual encoders for image generation. arXiv pr...

work page doi:10.1007/bf02288367 2023
[2]

In specific restoration domains such as blind face restoration, methods often leverage strong external priors

employs Group Relative Policy Optimization to align outputs with high-resolution reference patches, a direction further refined byChunk-GRPO(Luo et al., 2025), which optimizes generation at the temporal chunk level to fix advantage attribution.Q-Refine(Li et al., 2024a) introduces a quality-aware pipeline using pixel-level Image Quality Assessment (IQA) m...

work page 2025
[3]

II (Compression):We follow the common view that compressing the latent manifold helps simplify the modeling task

Insight from Cat. II (Compression):We follow the common view that compressing the latent manifold helps simplify the modeling task. RePack adopts this idea by projecting features into a compact low-dimensional space (d= 32)

work page
[4]

III (Semantic Fidelity):We observe that directly utilizing signals from frozen VFMs preserves higher semantic puritycompared to distilling them into a complex learnable encoder

Insight from Cat. III (Semantic Fidelity):We observe that directly utilizing signals from frozen VFMs preserves higher semantic puritycompared to distilling them into a complex learnable encoder

work page
[5]

IV (Decoupling):We follow a frequency-decoupled design

Insight from Cat. IV (Decoupling):We follow a frequency-decoupled design. High-frequency details are handled by a dedicated Refiner. RePack’s experimental results demonstrate that synthesizing the compression mechanism of V AEs, the semantic purity of frozen VFMs, and the decoupling strategy of PDMs provides a highly efficient solution for generative mode...

work page 1936
[6]

This confirms that our projection-based compression effectively retains core semantic structures that are often lost in standard reconstruction-based V AE training

Superiority over Baselines:RePack achieves a validation accuracy of42.48%, outperforming V A-V AE (28.43%) and the Standard V AE (0.85%). This confirms that our projection-based compression effectively retains core semantic structures that are often lost in standard reconstruction-based V AE training

work page
[7]

The linear classifier for DINOv3 requires0.77Mparameters, whereas RePack’s classifier uses only 0.03M

Efficiency Trade-off:While raw DINOv3 features achieve 82.56% accuracy, this comes at the cost of a 768- dimensional space. The linear classifier for DINOv3 requires0.77Mparameters, whereas RePack’s classifier uses only 0.03M. Despite a24×reduction in dimensionality and classifier capacity, RePack maintains resonable separability

work page
[8]

The performance gap between RePack (42.48%) and PCA arises from an intentional design trade-off

Reference to PCA:PCA-RePack (56.13%) can be regarded as the theoretical upper bound of linear separability within this 32-dimensional subspace, as justified in Appendix D.3.3 based on the Eckart–Young–Mirsky theorem. The performance gap between RePack (42.48%) and PCA arises from an intentional design trade-off. Unlike PCA, which is optimized to maximize ...

work page 2025