arxiv: 2512.19910 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Anisotropic electron-phonon coupling and chiral phonons in van der Waals room temperature ferromagnet Fe₅GeTe₂

Smrutiranjan Mekap , Andrzej Ptok , Jyoti Saini , Changgu Lee , Subhasis Ghosh , Anushree Roy

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords anisotropic electron-phonon couplingchiral phononsFe5GeTe2Raman spectroscopyvan der Waals ferromagnetspin-orbit couplingroom temperature magnetism

0 comments

The pith

Raman tilt reveals anisotropic electron-phonon coupling and chiral phonons in Fe5GeTe2

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Fe5GeTe2 exhibits anisotropic electron-phonon coupling through a pronounced tilt in angle-resolved Raman intensity measured under linear polarization configurations. Temperature-dependent data on the Raman tensor phase factors link this anisotropy to spin-orbit coupling effects, while wavelength dependence shows optical resonance enhances the interaction. Cross-circularly polarized Raman spectra supply direct evidence for chiral phonons, as expected from the material's threefold rotational symmetry. These observations position the room-temperature van der Waals ferromagnet as a platform for exploring couplings among lattice, electronic, and magnetic degrees of freedom.

Core claim

The central claim is that the strong tilt in angle-resolved Raman intensity under linear polarization configurations indicates anisotropic electron-phonon coupling in F5GT, with the temperature evolution of the Raman tensor phase factor revealing a spin-orbit coupling-mediated electron-phonon response, and cross-circularly polarized Raman measurements confirming the existence of chiral vibrational modes guaranteed by threefold symmetry.

What carries the argument

Tilt in angle-resolved Raman intensity under linear polarization and circular polarization response in cross-circular configurations, extracted via Raman tensor elements and phonon circular polarization calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The observed tilt in angle-resolved Raman intensity is caused by anisotropic electron-phonon coupling rather than sample misalignment, surface effects, or instrumental polarization artifacts.

What would settle it

A controlled angle-resolved Raman measurement on a single crystal of Fe5GeTe2 with verified alignment and no tilt in linear polarization intensity would falsify the anisotropic coupling claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19910 by Andrzej Ptok, Anushree Roy, Changgu Lee, Jyoti Saini, Smrutiranjan Mekap, Subhasis Ghosh.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Raman spectrum measured at 80 K in VV (in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Polar plots of normalized Raman intensity for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Superposition of double-degenerated modes E re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The layered van der Waals Fe$_5$GeTe$_2$ (F5GT) compound exhibits room-temperature ferromagnetism, making it a promising candidate for technological applications. In our study, combined temperature, wavelength, and polarization-dependent Raman measurements, along with {\it ab initio} calculations reveal important aspects of lattice dynamics and electron-phonon interactions. The angle-resolved Raman intensity under linear polarization configurations exhibits a strong tilt in the laboratory coordinate system, indicating the existence of anisotropic electron-phonon coupling. The temperature evolution of this anisotropy is discussed by extracting the phase factor of the Raman tensor elements from the angle-resolved intensity measured at different temperatures, also uncovering a spin-orbit coupling-mediated electron-phonon response in F5GT. The thermal evolution of electron-phonon coupling is also examined by measuring the temperature dependence of the Fano parameter of the asymmetric peak in the Raman spectra, while wavelength-dependent measurements establish the role of optical resonance in enhancing the anisotropic interaction. Finally, the threefold rotational symmetry guarantees the existence of chiral phonons. We present direct spectroscopic evidence for these chiral vibrational modes through cross-circularly polarized Raman measurements, complemented by theoretical calculations of phonon circular polarization. Together, these results identify F5GT as an ideal platform for investigating emergent couplings among lattice, electronic, and magnetic degrees of freedom and for advancing the understanding of chiral phonons in magnetic van der Waals materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Raman data on Fe5GeTe2 shows tilt and circular contrasts that could indicate anisotropic EPC plus chiral phonons, but the anisotropy claim rests on unverified alignment and needs controls before it lands.

read the letter

The main point is that this work uses polarization-dependent Raman on Fe5GeTe2 to extract a temperature-dependent phase factor from angle-resolved intensities and to report cross-circular signals for chiral modes. If the crystal axes line up properly with the lab frame, the combination gives a concrete experimental handle on lattice-electronic-magnetic coupling in a room-temperature vdW ferromagnet. That is the useful piece for people working in this area. They also track the Fano asymmetry with temperature and check wavelength dependence for resonance effects, all backed by ab initio phonon calculations. Those steps follow standard methods and produce internally consistent results on the surface. The chiral-phonon assignment draws on the threefold symmetry and matches the calculated circular polarization, so that part holds up better than the anisotropy claim. The soft spot is exactly where the stress test points: the observed tilt in the lab frame is taken as intrinsic anisotropic EPC without reported XRD orientation checks or controls on isotropic samples to rule out misalignment or birefringence. A few degrees of rotation or surface artifact would shift the apparent phase factor and weaken the temperature-evolution story. The abstract and methods summary do not address this directly, so the central attribution stays provisional until raw spectra and alignment data are examined. This paper is for condensed-matter groups focused on 2D magnets and phonon chirality. A reader already working on Raman in similar compounds would get value from the multi-configuration dataset and the specific material choice, even if they treat the anisotropy interpretation as a hypothesis rather than settled. It deserves peer review because the measurements are complementary and the material is relevant; a referee can push on the alignment controls and ask for the fitting details without the work being fundamentally unsound.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents polarization-, temperature-, and wavelength-dependent Raman spectroscopy measurements on the room-temperature van der Waals ferromagnet Fe₅GeTe₂, complemented by ab initio calculations. The central claims are that the tilt observed in angle-resolved Raman intensities under linear polarization configurations demonstrates anisotropic electron-phonon coupling, whose temperature evolution is analyzed via the phase of Raman tensor elements; wavelength dependence shows resonance enhancement; and cross-circularly polarized Raman spectra provide direct evidence for chiral phonons enabled by the threefold symmetry.

Significance. If substantiated, these findings would establish Fe₅GeTe₂ as a platform for studying coupled lattice, electronic, and magnetic degrees of freedom in magnetic van der Waals materials, with implications for room-temperature spintronic applications. The combination of experimental Raman data with theoretical phonon circular polarization calculations strengthens the identification of chiral modes.

major comments (1)

[Angle-resolved Raman measurements and associated figures] The attribution of the observed tilt in angle-resolved Raman intensity (under linear polarization) to anisotropic electron-phonon coupling is load-bearing for the central claim. The manuscript must include explicit verification of crystal orientation alignment to the laboratory frame (e.g., via XRD or polarized optical microscopy) and control measurements on isotropic reference samples to exclude misalignment or polarization leakage artifacts, as a few-degree rotation could produce equivalent tilts in the intensity pattern.

minor comments (2)

[Temperature-dependent analysis] Clarify the quantitative extraction of the Raman tensor phase factor from the angle-resolved intensity data, including any fitting assumptions or temperature-dependent error bars.
[Fano parameter analysis] Provide details on the raw spectra, baseline subtraction, and Fano parameter fitting procedure (including uncertainties) to support the temperature evolution claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The single major comment raises an important point about experimental controls for the angle-resolved Raman data. We address it directly below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Angle-resolved Raman measurements and associated figures] The attribution of the observed tilt in angle-resolved Raman intensity (under linear polarization) to anisotropic electron-phonon coupling is load-bearing for the central claim. The manuscript must include explicit verification of crystal orientation alignment to the laboratory frame (e.g., via XRD or polarized optical microscopy) and control measurements on isotropic reference samples to exclude misalignment or polarization leakage artifacts, as a few-degree rotation could produce equivalent tilts in the intensity pattern.

Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of crystal orientation and controls against artifacts is necessary to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Methods section to describe the alignment procedure in detail, including the use of polarized optical microscopy to determine the principal crystallographic axes relative to the laboratory frame. We will also add control Raman measurements performed on an isotropic reference sample (e.g., a silicon wafer) under identical optical conditions to demonstrate that the experimental setup does not introduce spurious tilts. These additions will be accompanied by updated figures or supplementary panels showing the control data. We believe this directly addresses the concern while preserving the interpretation of anisotropic electron-phonon coupling in Fe5GeTe2. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observables compared to independent ab initio calculations

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental Raman observables (angle-resolved intensities under linear and circular polarization, Fano parameters, temperature/wavelength dependence) that are compared against separate ab initio phonon and Raman tensor calculations. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or self-citation chain; the anisotropy attribution and chiral-mode identification are presented as empirical findings supported by external theoretical modeling rather than tautological renaming or load-bearing self-reference. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard symmetry arguments for chiral phonons under threefold rotation and on the conventional interpretation of Raman tensor elements and Fano lineshapes; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

Fano parameter
Extracted from the asymmetric Raman peak to quantify electron-phonon coupling strength; its temperature evolution is reported but the fitting procedure is not detailed in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Threefold rotational symmetry of the crystal guarantees the existence of chiral phonons
Invoked to justify the search for chiral modes via circular polarization contrast.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5580 in / 1233 out tokens · 26326 ms · 2026-05-16T20:00:03.472150+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

the threefold rotational symmetry guarantees the existence of chiral phonons... cross-circularly polarized Raman measurements... phonon circular polarization
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

additional complex phase... on the diagonal elements of the Raman tensor... electron–phonon coupling

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages

[1]

J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, and S. O. Valenzuela, Van der Waals heterostructures for spintronics and opto-spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol.16, 856 (2021)

work page 2021
[2]

S. Yang, T. Zhang, and C. Jiang, van der Waals mag- nets: Material family, detection and modulation of mag- netism, and perspective in spintronics, Adv. Sci.8, 2002488 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

J. T. Gish, D. Lebedev, T. W. Song, V. K. Sangwan, and M. C. Hersam, Van der Waals opto-spintronics, Nat. Electron.7, 336 (2024)

work page 2024
[4]

Z. Zhao, Y. Lin, and A. Avsar, Novel spintronic effects in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures, npj 2D Mater. Appl.9, 30 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

K. Kim, J. Seo, E. Lee, K.-T. Ko, B. S. Kim, B. G. Jang, J. M. Ok, J. Lee, Y. J. Jo, W. Kang, J. H. Shim, C. Kim, H. W. Yeom, B. Il Min, B.-J. Yang, and J. S. Kim, Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal, Nat. Mater.17, 794 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

X. Yang, X. Zhou, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, Strong magneto-optical effect and anomalous transport in the two-dimensional van der Waals magnets FenGeTe2 (n= 3, 4, 5), Phys. Rev. B104, 104427 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

M. Mi, H. Xiao, L. Yu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. Cao, and Y. Wang, Two-dimensional magnetic materials for spintronic devices, Materials Today Nano24, 100408 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

S. N. Kajale, T. Nguyen, C. A. Chao, D. C. Bono, A. Boonkird, M. Li, and D. Sarkar, Current-induced switching of a van der Waals ferromagnet at room tem- perature, Nat. Commun.15, 1485 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

Zhang, R

Z. Zhang, R. Sun, and Z. Wang, Recent advances in two-dimensional ferromagnetic materials-based van der Waals heterostructures, ACS Nano19, 187 (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der Waals het- erostructures, Nature499, 419 (2013)

work page 2013
[11]

K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. C. Neto, 2d materials and van der Waals het- erostructures, Science353, aac9439 (2016)

work page 2016
[12]

Zhong, K

D. Zhong, K. L. Seyler, X. Linpeng, R. Cheng, N. Sivadas, B. Huang, E. Schmidgall, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, W. Yao, D. Xiao, K.- M. C. Fu, and X. Xu, Van der Waals engineering of ferromagnetic semiconductor heterostructures for spin and valleytronics, Sci. Adv.3, e1603113 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

J. He, C. Wang, B. Zhou, Y. Zhao, L. Tao, and H. Zhang, 2D van der Waals heterostructures: process- ing, optical properties and applications in ultrafast pho- tonics, Mater. Horiz.7, 2903 (2020)

work page 2020
[14]

H. Xu, Y. Xue, Z. Liu, Q. Tang, T. Wang, X. Gao, Y. Qi, Y. P. Chen, C. Ma, and Y. Jiang, Van der Waals heterostructures for photoelectric, memory, and neural network applications, Small Sci4, 2300213 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Zollner, M

K. Zollner, M. Kurpas, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, First- principles determination of spin–orbit coupling param- eters in two-dimensional materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 255 (2025)

work page 2025
[16]

J. Seo, D. Y. Kim, E. S. An, K. Kim, G.-Y. Kim, S.-Y. Hwang, D. W. Kim, B. G. Jang, H. Kim, G. Eom, S. Y. Seo, R. Stania, M. Muntwiler, J. Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y. J. Jo, J. Lee, B. I. Min, M. H. Jo, H. W. Yeom, S.-Y. Choi, J. H. Shim, and J. S. Kim, Nearly room temperature ferromagnetism in a magnetic metal-rich van der Waals metal, Sci. Adv.6,...

work page 2020
[17]

Q. Liu, J. Xing, Z. Jiang, Y. Guo, X. Jiang, Y. Qi, and J. Zhao, Layer-dependent magnetic phase diagram in Fen GeTe2 (3≤n≤7) ultrathin films, Commun. Phys. 5, 140 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Jiang, Z

H. Jiang, Z. Zang, X. Wang, H. Que, L. Wang, K. Si, P. Zhang, Y. Ye, and Y. Gong, Thickness-tunable growth of composition-controllable two-dimensional FexGeTe2, Nano Lett22, 9477 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Ren and M

H. Ren and M. Lan, Progress and prospects in metallic FexGeTe2 (3≤x≤7) ferromagnets, Molecules28, 7244 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

Adhikari, B

A. Adhikari, B. K. Mahato, S. Sahoo, S. Mukhopadhyay, M. Palit, S. Bera, S. Datta, M. Mondal, and A. Barman, Room temperature evolution of laser-induced ultrafast spin and phonon dynamics in 2D van der Waals magnets FexGeTe2 (x= 3,4,5), Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2418006 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Deiseroth, K

H.-J. Deiseroth, K. Aleksandrov, C. Reiner, L. Kienle, and R. K. Kremer, Fe 3GeTe2 and Ni 3GeTe2 – two new layered transition-metal compounds: Crystal struc- tures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electri- cal properties, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2006, 1561 (2006)

work page 2006
[22]

B. Chen, J. H. Yang, H. D. Wang, M. Imai, H. Ohta, C. Michioka, K. Yoshimura, and M. H. Fang, Mag- netic properties of layered itinerant electron ferromag- net Fe3GeTe2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.82, 124711 (2013)

work page 2013
[23]

A. F. May, S. Calder, C. Cantoni, H. Cao, and M. A. McGuire, Magnetic structure and phase stability of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe 3−xGeTe2, Phys. Rev. B93, 014411 (2016)

work page 2016
[24]

Stahl, E

J. Stahl, E. Shlaen, and D. Johrendt, The van der waals ferromagnets Fe5−δGeTe2 and Fe5−δ−xNixGeTe2 – crys- tal structure, stacking faults, and magnetic properties, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.644, 1923 (2018)

work page 1923
[25]

A. F. May, D. Ovchinnikov, Q. Zheng, R. Hermann, S. Calder, B. Huang, Z. Fei, Y. Liu, X. Xu, and M. A. McGuire, Ferromagnetism near room temperature in the cleavable van der Waals crystal Fe 5GeTe2, ACS nano13, 4436 (2019)

work page 2019
[26]

Q. Li, M. Yang, C. Gong, R. V. Chopdekar, A. T. N’Diaye, J. Turner, G. Chen, A. Scholl, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, A. K. Schmid, S. Wang, K. Liu, N. Gao, A. S. Admasu, S.-W. Cheong, C. Hwang, J. Li, F. Wang, 7 X. Zhang, and Z. Qiu, Patterning-induced ferromag- netism of Fe 3GeTe2 van der Waals materials beyond room temperature, Nano Lett.18, 5974 (2018)

work page 2018
[27]

A. F. May, C. A. Bridges, and M. A. McGuire, Physical properties and thermal stability of Fe 5−xGeTe2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 104401 (2019)

work page 2019
[28]

Zhang, R

H. Zhang, R. Chen, K. Zhai, X. Chen, L. Caretta, X. Huang, R. V. Chopdekar, J. Cao, J. Sun, J. Yao, R. Birgeneau, and R. Ramesh, Itinerant ferromagnetism in van der Waals Fe5−xGeTe2 crystals above room tem- perature, Phys. Rev. B102, 064417 (2020)

work page 2020
[29]

Mondal, N

S. Mondal, N. Khan, S. M. Mishra, B. Satpati, and P. Mandal, Critical behavior in the van der Waals itin- erant ferromagnet Fe4GeTe2, Phys. Rev. B104, 094405 (2021)

work page 2021
[30]

C. Tian, F. Pan, S. Xu, K. Ai, T. Xia, and P. Cheng, Tunable magnetic properties in van der Waals crys- tals (Fe1−xCox)5GeTe2, Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 202402 (2020)

work page 2020
[31]

Zhang, Z

J. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Xing, X. Luo, Z. Wang, G. Wang, A. Shen, H. Ye, S. Dong, and L. Li, Enhanced magnetic and electrical properties of Co-doped Fe 5GeTe2, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 103103 (2024)

work page 2024
[32]

X. Wang, P. Li, Y. Li, X. Yang, Z. Lyu, F. Qu, J. Shen, X. Jing, G. Liu, L. Lu, J. Duan, and Z. Wang, Signature of canted ferromagnetism in van der Waals Fe5−xGeTe2 flakes, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 262405 (2025)

work page 2025
[33]

A. F. May, M.-H. Du, V. R. Cooper, and M. A. McGuire, Tuning magnetic order in the van der Waals metal Fe 5GeTe2 by cobalt substitution, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 074008 (2020)

work page 2020
[34]

R. Zhao, Y. Wu, S. Yan, X. Liu, H. Huang, Y. Gao, M. Zhu, J. Shen, S. Shen, W. Xu, Z. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Zheng, H. Lei, Y. Zhang, and S. Wang, Magnetoresistance anomaly in Fe 5GeTe2 homo-junctions induced by its intrinsic transition, Nano Res.16, 10443 (2023)

work page 2023
[35]

Suzuki, T

R. Suzuki, T. Gao, H. Nakayama, and K. Ando, Extrin- sic anomalous Hall effect in van der Waals ferromagnet Fe5GeTe2, AIP Advances13, 055311 (2023)

work page 2023
[36]

A. Moon, Y. Li, C. McKeever, B. W. Casas, M. Bravo, W. Zheng, J. Macy, A. K. Petford-Long, G. T. Mc- Candless, J. Y. Chan, C. Phatak, E. J. G. Santos, and L. Balicas, Writing and detecting topological charges in exfoliated Fe5−xGeTe2, ACS Nano18, 4216 (2024)

work page 2024
[37]

H. Yu, X. Li, Y.-Q. Bie, L. Yan, L. Zhou, P. Yu, and G. Yang, Quantum metric third-order nonlinear hall ef- fect in a non-centrosymmetric ferromagnet, Nat. Com- mun.16, 7698 (2025)

work page 2025
[38]

X. Chen, W. Tian, Y. He, H. Zhang, T. L. Werner, S. Lapidus, J. P. C. Ruff, R. Ramesh, and R. J. Birge- neau, Thermal cycling induced alteration of the stack- ing order and spin-flip in the room temperature van der Waals magnet Fe5GeTe2, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 044411 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

Z. Lin, Y. Peng, B. Wu, C. Wang, Z. Luo, and J. Yang, Magnetic van der Waals materials: Synthesis, structure, magnetism, and their potential applications, Chinese Phys. B31, 087506 (2022)

work page 2022
[40]

Saito, Y

R. Saito, Y. Tatsumi, S. Huang, X. Ling, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Raman spectroscopy of transition metal dichalcogenides, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 353002 (2016)

work page 2016
[41]

M. A. Pimenta, G. C. Resende, H. B. Ribeiro, and B. R. Carvalho, Polarized Raman spectroscopy in low- symmetry 2D materials: angle-resolved experiments and complex number tensor elements, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.23, 27103 (2021)

work page 2021
[42]

T. Wang, H. Sun, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons: Prediction, verification, and application, Nano Lett.24, 4311 (2024)

work page 2024
[43]

This Supplemental Material includes Refs

See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional experimental and theoretical results. This Supplemental Material includes Refs. []

work page
[44]

H. Wang, H. Lu, Z. Guo, A. Li, P. Wu, J. Li, W. Xie, Z. Sun, P. Li, H. Damas, A. M. Friedel, S. Migot, J. Ghanbaja, L. Moreau, Y. Fagot-Revurat, S. Petit- Watelot, T. Hauet, J. Robertson, S. Mangin, W. Zhao, and T. Nie, Interfacial engineering of ferromagnetism in wafer-scale van der Waals Fe 4GeTe2 far above room temperature, Nat. Commun.14, 2483 (2023)

work page 2023
[45]

T. T. Ly, J. Park, K. Kim, H.-B. Ahn, N. J. Lee, K. Kim, T.-E. Park, G. Duvjir, N. H. Lam, K. Jang, C.-Y. You, Y. Jo, S. K. Kim, C. Lee, S. Kim, and J. Kim, Direct observation of Fe-Ge ordering in Fe 5−xGeTe2 crystals and resultant helimagnetism, Adv. Funct. Mater.31, 2009758 (2021)

work page 2021
[46]

Alahmed, B

L. Alahmed, B. Nepal, J. Macy, W. Zheng, B. Casas, A. Sapkota, N. Jones, A. R. Mazza, M. Brahlek, W. Jin, M. Mahjouri-Samani, S. S.-L. Zhang, C. Mewes, L. Bali- cas, T. Mewes, and P. Li, Magnetism and spin dynamics in room-temperature van der waals magnet Fe 5GeTe2, 2D Mater.8, 045030 (2021)

work page 2021
[47]

Walve, P

V. Walve, P. Parakh, U. Rajput, A. S. Mhase, K. Singh, and A. Deshpande, Unveiling different structural order- ings in Fe5−xGeTe2, Phys. Rev. B110, 075119 (2024)

work page 2024
[48]

Liang, L

R. Liang, L. Zhou, J. Liu, and N. Tang, Anisotropic magnetic critical behavior of van der Waals room- temperature ferromagnet Fe 5GeTe2 identified by mag- netocaloric measurements, J. Appl. Phys.136, 193902 (2024)

work page 2024
[49]

Liang, J

R. Liang, J. Liu, L. Zhou, and N. Tang, Large rela- tive cooling power in van der Waals room-temperature ferromagnet Fe5GeTe2, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 182406 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

M. T. Birch, F. S. Yasin, K. Litzius, L. Powalla, S. Wintz, F. Schulz, A. E. Kossak, M. Weigand, T. Scholz, B. V. Lotsch, G. Sch¨ utz, X. Z. Yu, and M. Burghard, Influence of magnetic sublattice ordering on skyrmion bubble stability in 2D magnet Fe 5GeTe2, ACS Nano18, 18246 (2024)

work page 2024
[51]

Schmitt, T

M. Schmitt, T. Denneulin, A. Kov´ acs, T. G. Saun- derson, P. R¨ ußmann, A. Shahee, T. Scholz, A. H. Tavabi, M. Gradhand, P. Mavropoulos, B. V. Lotsch, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, Y. Mokrousov, S. Bl¨ ugel, and M. Kl¨ aui, Skyrmionic spin structures in layered Fe5GeTe2 up to room temperature, Commun. Phys.5, 254 (2022)

work page 2022
[52]

Mobaraki, C

A. Mobaraki, C. Sevik, H. Yapicioglu, D. Cakir, and O. Gulseren, Temperature-dependent phonon spectrum of transition metal dichalcogenides calculated from the spectral energy density: Lattice thermal conductivity as an application, Phys. Rev. B100, 035402 (2019)

work page 2019
[53]

Wilczy´ nski, A

K. Wilczy´ nski, A. P. Gertych, K. Czerniak- Losiewicz, J. Sitek, and M. Zdrojek, Phonon anharmonicity in multi-layered WS2 explored by first-principles and Ra- man studies, Acta Materialia240, 118299 (2022). 8

work page 2022
[54]

S. Bae, K. Matsumoto, H. Raebiger, K.-i. Shudo, Y.- H. Kim, Ø. S. Handeg˚ ard, T. Nagao, M. Kitajima, Y. Sakai, X. Zhang, R. Vajtai, P. Ajayan, J. Kono, J. Takeda, and I. Katayama, K-point longitudinal acous- tic phonons are responsible for ultrafast intervalley scat- tering in monolayer MoSe 2, Nat. Commun.13, 4279 (2022)

work page 2022
[55]

D. L. Nika, E. P. Pokatilov, A. S. Askerov, and A. A. Ba- landin, Phonon thermal conduction in graphene: Role of umklapp and edge roughness scattering, Phys. Rev. B79, 155413 (2009)

work page 2009
[56]

Libbi, N

F. Libbi, N. Bonini, and N. Marzari, Thermomechan- ical properties of honeycomb lattices from internal- coordinates potentials: the case of graphene and hexag- onal boron nitride, 2D Materials8, 015026 (2020)

work page 2020
[57]

Milosavljevi´ c, A.ˇSolaji´ c, S

A. Milosavljevi´ c, A.ˇSolaji´ c, S. Djurdji´ c-Mijin, J. Peˇ si´ c, B. Viˇ si´ c, Y. Liu, C. Petrovic, N. Lazarevi´ c, and Z. V. Popovi´ c, Lattice dynamics and phase transitions in Fe3−xGeTe2, Phys. Rev. B99, 214304 (2019)

work page 2019
[58]

L. Du, J. Tang, Y. Zhao, X. Li, R. Yang, X. Hu, X. Bai, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Shi, G. Yu, X. Bai, T. Hasan, G. Zhang, and Z. Sun, Lattice dy- namics, phonon chirality, and spin–phonon coupling in 2D itinerant ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2, Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1904734 (2019)

work page 2019
[59]

Xu, S.-Y

J.-M. Xu, S.-Y. Wang, W.-J. Wang, Y.-H. Zhou, X.-L. Chen, Z.-R. Yang, and Z. Qu, Possible tricritical behav- ior and anomalous lattice softening in van der Waals itinerant ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2 under high pressure, Chin. Phys. Lett.37, 076202 (2020)

work page 2020
[60]

X. Kong, T. Berlijn, and L. Liang, Thickness and spin dependence of raman modes in magnetic layered Fe3GeTe2, Adv. Electron. Mater.7, 2001159 (2021)

work page 2021
[61]

N.-T. Dang, D. P. Kozlenko, O. N. Lis, S. E. Kichanov, Y. V. Lukin, N. O. Golosova, B. N. Savenko, D.-L. Duong, T.-L. Phan, T.-A. Tran, and M.-H. Phan, High pressure-driven magnetic disorder and structural trans- formation in Fe3GeTe2: Emergence of a magnetic quan- tum critical point, Adv. Sci.10, 2206842 (2023)

work page 2023
[62]

Zhang, H

G. Zhang, H. Wu, L. Yang, W. Jin, B. Xiao, W. Zhang, and H. Chang, Lattice vibration, raman modes and room-temperature spin-phonon coupling in intrinsic two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnetic Fe3GaTe2, ACS Materials Lett.7, 1289 (2025)

work page 2025
[63]

R. L. Yadav, P. Bag, C.-C. Lai, Y.-K. Kuo, C.-N. Kuo, and C.-S. Lue, Thermal history-dependent char- acteristics in van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 5−xGeTe2 (x∼0.16), APL Mater.12, 081103 (2024)

work page 2024
[64]

J. Li, Y. Wang, P. Wu, J. Song, Z. Li, L. Cao, G. Wang, and Y. Xiong, Spin–lattice coupling and anisotropic magneto-transport in Fe-ordered Fe 5−xGeTe2, Appl. Phys. Lett.127, 042401 (2025)

work page 2025
[65]

Z. Liu, K. Guo, G. Hu, Z. Shi, Y. Li, L. Zhang, H. Chen, L. Zhang, P. Zhou, H. Lu, M.-L. Lin, S. Liu, Y. Cheng, X. L. Liu, J. Xie, L. Bi, P.-H. Tan, L. Deng, C.-W. Qiu, and B. Peng, Observation of nonreciprocal mag- netophonon effect in nonencapsulated few-layered CrI 3, Sci. Adv.6, eabc7628 (2020)

work page 2020
[66]

McCreary, T

A. McCreary, T. T. Mai, F. G. Utermohlen, J. R. Simp- son, K. F. Garrity, X. Feng, D. Shcherbakov, Y. Zhu, J. Hu, D. Weber, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. E. Goldberger, Z. Mao, C. N. Lau, Y. Lu, N. Trivedi, R. Vald´ es Aguilar, and A. R. Hight Walker, Distinct magneto-Raman signatures of spin-flip phase transitions in CrI3, Nature Commun.11, 3879 (2020)

work page 2020
[67]

Y. Wan, X. Cheng, Y. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Du, Y. Zhao, B. Peng, L. Dai, and E. Kan, Manipulating the Raman scattering rotation via magnetic field in an MoS2 mono- layer, RSC Adv.11, 4035 (2021)

work page 2021
[68]

Y. Sun, B. Liu, C. K. Gan, S. Xia, H. Lin, S. Liu, and T. Yu, Strong and reciprocal magneto-phonon ef- fects in a 2D antiferromagnetic semiconductor FePSe 3, Nanoscale17, 8476 (2025)

work page 2025
[69]

A. P. Cracknell, Scattering matrices for the Raman ef- fect in magnetic crystals, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 2, 500 (1969)

work page 1969
[70]

B. Lyu, Y. Gao, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, X. Wu, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, G. Li, Q. Huang, N. Zhang, Y. Chen, J. Mei, H. Yan, Y. Zhao, L. Huang, and M. Huang, Prob- ing the ferromagnetism and spin wave gap in VI 3 by helicity-resolved Raman spectroscopy, Nano Lett.20, 6024 (2020)

work page 2020
[71]

Jiang, R

J. Jiang, R. Saito, K. Sato, J. S. Park, G. G. Sam- sonidze, A. Jorio, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dressel- haus, Exciton-photon, exciton-phonon matrix elements, and resonant Raman intensity of single-wall carbon nan- otubes, Phys. Rev. B75, 035405 (2007)

work page 2007
[72]

S. Han, Y. Zhao, N. Tuan Hung, B. Xu, R. Saito, J. Zhang, and L. Tong, Complex Raman tensor in helicity-changing Raman spectra of black phosphorus under circularly polarized light, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 1241 (2022)

work page 2022
[73]

M.-L. Lin, Y. Zhou, J.-B. Wu, X. Cong, X.-L. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Li, W. Yao, and P.-H. Tan, Cross- dimensional electron-phonon coupling in van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Commun.10, 2419 (2019)

work page 2019
[74]

N. T. Hung, J. Huang, Y. Tatsumi, T. Yang, and R. Saito, QERaman: An open-source program for cal- culating resonance Raman spectra based on Quantum ESPRESSO, Comput. Phys. Commun.295, 108967 (2024)

work page 2024
[75]

Kumar, B

D. Kumar, B. Singh, R. Kumar, M. Kumar, and P. Ku- mar, Anisotropic electron–photon–phonon coupling in layered MoS 2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 415702 (2020)

work page 2020
[76]

G. C. Resende, G. A. S. Ribeiro, O. J. Silveira, J. S. Lemos, J. C. Brant, D. Rhodes, L. Balicas, M. Ter- rones, M. S. C. Mazzoni, C. Fantini, B. R. Carvalho, and M. A. Pimenta, Origin of the complex Raman ten- sor elements in single-layer triclinic ReSe 2, 2D Mater. 8, 025002 (2020)

work page 2020
[77]

Zhang and Q

L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral phonons at high-symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 115502 (2015)

work page 2015
[78]

Schaack, Observation of circularly polarized phonon states in an external magnetic field, J

G. Schaack, Observation of circularly polarized phonon states in an external magnetic field, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.9, L297 (1976)

work page 1976
[79]

M. Che, J. Liang, Y. Cui, H. Li, B. Lu, W. Sang, X. Li, X. Dong, L. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Sun, W. Jiang, E. Liu, F. Jin, T. Zhang, and L. Yang, Magnetic or- der induced chiral phonons in a ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196906 (2025)

work page 2025
[80]

Oishi, Y

E. Oishi, Y. Fujii, and A. Koreeda, Selective observation of enantiomeric chiral phonons inα-quartz, Phys. Rev. B109, 104306 (2024)

work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.