pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.21951 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-26 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · cond-mat.soft· physics.chem-ph

Tuning diffusioosmosis of electrolyte solutions by hydrostatic pressure

Elena F. Silkina , Evgeny S. Asmolov , Olga I. Vinogradova This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.softphysics.chem-ph
keywords diffusioosmosiselectrolytehydrostatic pressurecharged slitsurface potentialconcentration profilefluid flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hydrostatic pressure tunes diffusio-osmotic flow by reshaping concentration profiles in charged slits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theory for diffusio-osmotic flow in a long uniformly charged slit connecting reservoirs of different salinities, focusing on how an applied hydrostatic pressure drop affects the flow. Although the local slip velocity depends only on surface potential and salt concentration gradient, the pressure modifies the nonlinear concentration and potential profiles along the slit, leading to a rich variety of possible flows. The global flow rate is the sum of diffusio-osmotic and pressure-driven terms, and measurements of this rate provide direct information on the internal profiles, explaining recent experiments and enabling sensing of surface potential salt dependence.

Core claim

For a thick slit the flow rate Q is the sum of a diffusio-osmotic term, set by the local slip, and a pressure-driven Poiseuille term. The local concentration c(x) is related to Q through an equation that allows the surface potential to be expressed as a function of position once Q is known. Because Q can be tuned by the pressure drop Delta p, the concentration and surface potential profiles can be varied widely even though the local slip formula itself is independent of pressure.

What carries the argument

The relation between global flow rate Q and local concentration, which determines the position-dependent surface potential and thus the local diffusio-osmotic slip.

If this is right

  • Pressure drop can be used to tune the concentration profile without changing the reservoirs.
  • Flow measurements at different pressures directly yield the concentration and surface potential profiles.
  • The theory applies to sensing how surface potentials depend on salt concentration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism could allow pressure-based control of flow direction or magnitude in lab-on-chip devices.
  • Similar tuning might occur in biological ion channels or porous rocks where pressure gradients coexist with salinity differences.
  • Experiments could vary pressure while monitoring flow to map potential profiles at different salt levels.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the slit thickness exceeds the local Debye screening length and that the walls remain uniformly charged, allowing the local slip formula to be applied despite the nonlinear profiles.

What would settle it

Compare predicted concentration profiles, derived from measured flow rates at various pressure drops, with independent measurements of concentration along the slit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.21951 by Elena F. Silkina, Evgeny S. Asmolov, Olga I. Vinogradova.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of the microchannel of thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: the flow rate Q = −∆p/3 ≃ 33.3 expected un￾der the same applied pressure, but the vanishing of the concentration difference. The integral in (35) becomes divergent if |ℓGC| → 0. This singularity can be identified by Taylor expanding the expression for us and φs at large λD/ |ℓGC|, which implies that cm ≪ (λ ⋆ D/ℓGC) 2 . Using (33) and (29) we find us ≃ − βφs + |φs| cm ∂xcm (36) where φs is given by (24). T… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The flow rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: illustrates well that at PeQ = −30 the “bulk” con￾centration is constant and equal to that in the high salin￾ity reservoir in the most of the slit. However, a negative hydrostatic pressure drop first makes the concentration profile less convex and then rectifies it [when Q = 0 is reached]. If we decrease (i.e. increase in magnitude) the negative pressure drop, the profile becomes concave. On decreasing ∆p … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: We emphasise that the positive global flow rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Concentration profiles calculated using Pe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The calculations are made from Eq. (46) using the concentration profiles of NaCl obtained from Eq. (51). Also included are calculations for the situations of zero Q and J . The lowermost curve corresponds to the limit PeQ ≫ 1, there cm is given by (52). For this special case Eq. (46) can be transformed to ψm = −β ln  1 + ∆c exp  PeQ 1 − β 2 (x − 1) . (60) In the case of zero J the concentration cm is d… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The same as in Fig. 6, but for Pe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows φs(x) for NaCl solution obtained from Eq. (22) using ℓGC = −1 nm, which gives λ ⋆/ℓGC ≃ 10, and provide concentration profiles shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For example, the φs-curves obtained for large |PeQ| include the extended regions of constant surface potentials. However, the latter vary linearly with x, if J = 0. At first sight this is surprising, but the nature of such a qualitative similarity of ψm and φs is apparent. Indeed, from Eqs. (25) and (46) it follows that the surface poten￾tial for walls of a high negative charge is related to ψm linearly, a… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Slip velocity as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Recall that Lee et al. [15] assumed that cm varies linearly with x, and a constant φs ≃ 3.4 [Φs ≃ 85 mV] was inferred from the data. To obtain the concentra￾tion profiles for LiI with c1 = 11, 4, and 1.6 used in ex￾periment, we first find Q from Eq. (35). The concen￾tration profile can then easily be found from Eq. (51) and employed to calculate [from Eq. (22)] the surface potential distribution. The calc… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When two reservoirs of a distinct salinity are connected by channels or pores, a fluid flow termed diffusio-osmotic is generated. This article investigates the flow emerging in an uniformly charged long slit whose thickness exceeds the local Debye screening length. Attention is focussed on the role of hydrostatic pressure drop $\Delta p$ in establishing diffusioosmosis at a finite concentration difference. For a thick slit we recover the known formula for a local diffusio-osmotic slip over a single wall, which is determined by the surface potential, salt concentration and its gradient. An equation for the global fluid flow rate $\mathcal{Q}$ is presented as a sum of the diffusio-osmotic and pressure-driven contributions. Although the diffusio-osmotic term itself remains unaffected by $\Delta p$, the nonlinear concentration and surface potential profiles along the slit, and consequently, the local slip velocity are dramatically modified. We present an equation relating the local concentration to $\mathcal{Q}$ and employ it to derive an expression describing the surface potential variation in the slit. Since $\mathcal{Q}$ can easily be tuned by $\Delta p$, the variety of possible concentration and surface potential profiles becomes very rich. Our theory provides a simple explanation of recent flow rate measurements and shows that experimental data provide rather direct information about concentration and surface potential profiles in the uniformly charged slit. The relevance of our results for sensing the salt dependence of surface potentials is discussed briefly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory for diffusio-osmotic flow in a uniformly charged long slit whose thickness exceeds the local Debye length, connecting reservoirs of different salinities. It recovers the known local diffusio-osmotic slip velocity determined by surface potential, concentration, and its gradient; derives the global flow rate Q as the sum of diffusio-osmotic and pressure-driven contributions; and shows that an applied hydrostatic pressure drop Δp leaves the diffusio-osmotic term itself unchanged but dramatically alters the nonlinear concentration and surface potential profiles along the slit via an equation relating local concentration to Q. The work claims this framework provides a simple explanation of recent flow-rate measurements and that experimental data yield rather direct information on the profiles, with brief discussion of relevance for sensing the salt dependence of surface potentials.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the results supply a straightforward theoretical link between tunable pressure and diffusio-osmotic flows that recovers standard limits and yields explicit expressions for the modified profiles. This strengthens interpretability of experiments in charged nanochannels and supports applications in sensing salt-dependent surface potentials. The derivation from standard electrokinetic equations with pressure as an independent parameter is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of global flow rate Q] The derivation of the global flow rate Q and the local slip application assumes h ≫ λ_D(x) holds everywhere so that the instantaneous local c and ∇c can be used; however, finite Δc and Δp-tuned Q produce nonlinear c(x) that can make the local Debye length comparable to slit thickness at some positions. No explicit check of the minimum h/λ_D ratio along the slit or quantification of the error in the integrated Q is reported (see the section deriving the flow-rate expression and the statement of the thick-slit assumption).
  2. [Equation relating local concentration to Q] The claim that experimental data provide rather direct information about concentration and surface potential profiles rests on integrating the local slip while solving the coupled nonlinear profiles; without numerical solutions, plots of c(x) and ψ(x) for representative Δp values, or error bounds when the h ≫ λ_D assumption is only marginally satisfied, the richness of possible profiles and the explanatory power for measurements remain qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure all symbols (e.g., Q, Δp, λ_D) are defined at first use and that the notation for the flow rate is consistent between text and equations.
  2. The abstract refers to 'recent flow rate measurements' without citation; the manuscript should include specific references to the experiments being explained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the validation of our assumptions and the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of the global flow rate Q and the local slip application assumes h ≫ λ_D(x) holds everywhere so that the instantaneous local c and ∇c can be used; however, finite Δc and Δp-tuned Q produce nonlinear c(x) that can make the local Debye length comparable to slit thickness at some positions. No explicit check of the minimum h/λ_D ratio along the slit or quantification of the error in the integrated Q is reported (see the section deriving the flow-rate expression and the statement of the thick-slit assumption).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the h ≫ λ_D(x) assumption is necessary to confirm the range of validity. In the revised manuscript we will add a calculation of the minimum h/λ_D ratio along the slit for the experimental parameters discussed (including the effect of Δp-tuned Q on the nonlinear c(x)). We will also provide a brief error estimate for the integrated Q when the local ratio approaches order unity at isolated positions, using the known scaling of the slip velocity with h/λ_D. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim that experimental data provide rather direct information about concentration and surface potential profiles rests on integrating the local slip while solving the coupled nonlinear profiles; without numerical solutions, plots of c(x) and ψ(x) for representative Δp values, or error bounds when the h ≫ λ_D assumption is only marginally satisfied, the richness of possible profiles and the explanatory power for measurements remain qualitative.

    Authors: We accept that the current analytic presentation leaves the profile richness largely qualitative. In the revision we will include numerical solutions of the coupled equations for c(x) and ψ(x) at several representative Δp values, together with the corresponding plots. These will be used to illustrate the variety of profiles and to quantify the explanatory power for the cited flow-rate measurements. Error bounds associated with marginal satisfaction of h ≫ λ_D will be discussed in the same section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from standard electrokinetics is self-contained

full rationale

The paper begins with the standard electrokinetic equations for a thick slit (h ≫ λ_D) and recovers the known local diffusio-osmotic slip velocity formula, which is then integrated along the channel while solving the coupled nonlinear concentration and potential profiles self-consistently with the global flow rate Q tuned by Δp. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, no self-citation is load-bearing for the central result, and the flow-rate expression is derived directly from the local slip plus Poiseuille contribution without tautology. The claim that data provide direct information on profiles follows from this integration rather than from re-labeling inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theory rests on standard continuum electrokinetic assumptions without introducing new entities or many fitted parameters.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Slit thickness exceeds the local Debye screening length and walls are uniformly charged
    Allows recovery of the known local diffusio-osmotic slip formula and continuum treatment of transport.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1133 out tokens · 33219 ms · 2026-05-16T20:00:54.324414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    salty” reservoir λ D reduces, since the “bulk

    7 nm leading to a useful relation ℓGC [nm] ≃ 36[nm] σ [mC/ m2] . The values of σ of dielectric surfaces inferred from elec- trokinetic experiments and surface force measurements have immense variability depending on their material, its preparation and modification, environment, and pH [23– 25]. For example, some studies inferred a surface charge about -4 m...

    work page

  2. [2]

    apparent slip

    305[nm] √ C0[mol/ l] . Thus, on increasing C0 from 10− 6 to 1 mol/l the screening length reduces from about 300 down to 0.3 nm. For all specimen examples below we set H = 100 nm, the same as in prior work [21, 22]. If so, the thick channel limit is expected when λ ⋆ D ≤ 10 nm, i.e. pro- vided that in the “fresh” bath C0 ≥ 10− 3 mol/l. Below we fix C0 = 10 ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    fresh” side [and simultaneously less convex near the “salty

    0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x 0 50 100cm FIG. 5. Concentration cm as a function of x for NaCl [Pe = 0. 272,β = − 0. 208]. Solid and dash-dotted curves show calculations using Pe Q = − 30 and 30. Dashed and dotted curves correspond to the cases when Q = 0 and J = 0. Filled and open circles are obtained using Eqs. (52) and (59). Fille d and open squares...

    work page

  4. [4]

    6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 x 100 101 102 103 cm FIG. 6. Concentration profiles calculated using Pe Q = 30 for the same β = − 0. 3 as in Fig. 4 and c1 = 1, 10, 102, and

    work page

  5. [5]

    fresh” bath. The local “bulk

    The filled circles and squares are calculations for KCl and NaCl. The open circle, triangle, and square show cm for LiI, LiCl, and LiNO 3. The midplane concentration profiles of electrolyte then have the form shown (in a log-linear scale) in Fig. 6. The calculations are made from Eq. (51) using the same values ofβ andc1 as in Fig. 4. Also included is the co...

    work page

  6. [6]

    0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x

    work page

  7. [7]

    0 ψ m FIG. 8. Midplane potential ψ m vsx computed from Eq. (46) forcm displayed in Fig. 5. Filled and open circles are obtained using Eqs. (60) and (63). Filled and open squares show pre- dictions of Eqs. (61) and (62). The profiles of ψ m(x) for special cases of large posi- tive and negative Pe Q, which obviously represent bounds on the attainable local m...

    work page

  8. [8]

    0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x − 6 − 4 − 2 φ s FIG. 9. Surface potential φ s vs x computed from Eq. (22) using ℓGC = − 1 nm for cm displayed in Fig. 5. Filled and open circles show predictions of Eq. (64) with ψ m calculated from Eqs. (60) and (63). Filled and open squares are obtained using Eq. (64) with ψ m given by Eqs. (61) and (62). Figure 9 shows...

    work page

  9. [9]

    0 0 . 5 1 . 0 x − 2. 5 − 2. 0 − 1. 5 − 1. 0 φ s FIG. 12. Concentration cm (left) and surface potential ψ s (right) vs x computed from Eqs. (48) and (22) for LiI [ β = − 0. 33, Pe = 0 . 297] using λ ⋆ D/ℓ GC = − 1. 6. Solid curves from top to bottom show calculations made with ∆ c = 10, 3, 0. 6 and ∆ p = 0. Circles and squares are obtained from Eqs. (58) a...

    work page

  10. [10]

    the linear dependence of Q on small ∆ c was ob- served), but only qualitatively

    are reconcilable with predictions of these equations (e.g. the linear dependence of Q on small ∆ c was ob- served), but only qualitatively. The point is that the surface potential in this experiment was moderate [see Fig. 12 (right)], i.e. neither high, nor low. Thus, more experimental effort is required to validate them

    work page

  11. [11]

    J. L. Anderson, Colloid transport by interfacial forces , Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 61 (1989)

    work page 1989

  12. [12]

    Deryagin, S

    B. Deryagin, S. Dukhin, and A. Korotkova, Diffusio- phoresis in electrolyte solutions and its role in mechanism of film formation from rubber latexes by method of ionic deposition, Kolloidn. Zh. 23, 53 (1961)

    work page 1961

  13. [13]

    Feldmann, S

    D. Feldmann, S. R. Maduar, M. Santer, N. Lomadze, O. I. Vinogradova, and S. Santer, Manipulation of small particles at solid liquid interface: light driven diffusioo s- mosis, Sci. Rep. 6, 36443 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    J. P. Ebel, J. L. Anderson, and D. C. Prieve, Diffusio- phoresis of latex particles in electrolyte gradients, Lang - muir 4, 396 (1988)

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    De Corato, X

    M. De Corato, X. Arqu´ e, T. Patino, M. Arroyo, S. S´ anchez, and I. Pagonabarraga, Self-propulsion of ac- tive colloids via ion release: Theory and experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 108001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    E. S. Asmolov, T. V. Nizkaya, and O. I. Vinogradova, Self-diffusiophoresis of Janus particles that release ions , Phys. Fluids 34, 032011 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    T. V. Nizkaya, E. S. Asmolov, and O. I. Vinogradova, Theoretical modeling of catalytic self-propulsion, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 62, 101637 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Ab´ ecassis, C

    B. Ab´ ecassis, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, A. Ajdari, and L. Bocquet, Osmotic manipulation of particles for microfluidic applications, New J. Physics 11, 075022 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Wanunu, W

    M. Wanunu, W. Morrison, Y. Rabin, A. Y. Grosberg, and A. Meller, Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 160 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    N. Shi, R. Nery-Azevedo, A. I. Abdel-Fattah, and T. M. Squires, Diffusiophoretic focusing of suspended colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 258001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Feldmann, P

    D. Feldmann, P. Arya, T. Y. Molotilin, N. Lomadze, A. Kopyshev, O. I. Vinogradova, and S. A. Santer, Ex- tremely long-range light-driven repulsion of porous mi- croparticles, Langmuir 36, 6994 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    P. Arya, M. Umlandt, J. Jelken, D. Feldmann, N. Lo- madze, E. S. Asmolov, O. I. Vinogradova, and S. San- ter, Light-induced manipulation of passive and active mi- croparticles, Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    A. V. Hardikar, A. W. Hauser, T. M. Hopkins, S. Sacanna, and P. M. Chaikin, Osmotic and phoretic competition explains chemotaxic assembly and sorting, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2410840121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Chakra, C

    A. Chakra, C. Puijk, G. T. Vladisavljevi´ c, C. Cottin- Bizonne, C. Pirat, and G. Bolognesi, Surface chemistry- based continuous separation of colloidal particles via dif - fusiophoresis and diffusioosmosis, J. Colloid Interface Sc i. 693, 137577 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    C. Lee, C. Cottin-Bizonne, A.-L. Biance, P. Joseph, L. Bocquet, and C. Ybert, Osmotic flow through fully permeable nanochannels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 244501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    D. C. Prieve, J. L. Anderson, J. P. Ebel, and M. E. Low- ell, Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 2. Electrolytes, J. Fluid Mech. 148, 247 (1984)

    work page 1984

  27. [27]

    P. B. Peters, R. Van Roij, M. Z. Bazant, and P. M. Biesheuvel, Analysis of electrolyte transport through charged nanopores, Phys. Rev. E 93, 053108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    H. C. Ma and H. J. Keh, Diffusioosmosis of electrolyte solutions in a fine capillary slit, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298, 476 (2006)

    work page 2006

  29. [29]

    H. J. Keh, Diffusiophoresis of charged particles and dif - fusioosmosis of electrolyte solutions, Curr. Opin. Colloi d Interface Sci. 24, 13 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Jing and S

    H. Jing and S. Das, Theory of diffusioosmosis in a charged nanochannel, PCCP 20, 10204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    E. S. Asmolov, E. F. Silkina, and O. I. Vinogradova, Dif- 17 fusioosmosis of electrolyte solutions in uniformly charge d channels, Phys. Fluids 37, 112020 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    J. T. Ault, S. Shin, and H. A. Stone, Characterization of surface–solute interactions by diffusioosmosis, Soft Matt . 15, 1582 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    S. H. Behrens and D. G. Grier, The charge of glass and silica surfaces, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6716 (2001)

    work page 2001

  34. [34]

    H.-J. Butt, K. Graf, and M. Kappl, Physics and chem- istry of interfaces (John Wiley & Sons, 2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Hartkamp, A.-L

    R. Hartkamp, A.-L. Biance, L. Fu, J.-F. Dufrˆ eche, O. Bonhomme, and L. Joly, Measuring surface charge: Why experimental characterization and molecular mod- eling should be coupled, Cur. Op. Colloid Interface Sci. 37, 101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Y. I. Rabinovich, B. V. Derjaguin, and N. V. Churaev, Direct measurements of long-range surface forces in gas and liquid media, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 16, 63 (1982)

    work page 1982

  37. [37]

    W. A. Ducker, T. J. Senden, and R. M. Pashley, Direct measurement of colloidal forces using an atomic force mi- croscope, Nature 353, 239 (1991)

    work page 1991

  38. [38]

    Yaroshchuk, Y

    A. Yaroshchuk, Y. Boiko, and A. Makovetskiy, Ion- rejection, electrokinetic and electrochemical propertie s of a nanoporous track-etched membrane and their interpre- tation by means of space charge model, Langmuir 25, 9605 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Stein, M

    D. Stein, M. Kruithof, and C. Dekker, Surface-charge- governed ion transport in nanofluidic channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 035901 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Kitamura, K

    A. Kitamura, K. Fujiwara, T. Yamamoto, S. Nishikawa, and H. Moriyama, Analysis of adsorption behavior of cations onto quartz surface by electrical double-layer model, Journal of nuclear science and technology 36, 1167 (1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    L. S. ˇCerovi´ c, S. K. Milonji´ c, D. Bahloul-Hourlier, and B. Doucey, Surface properties of silicon nitride powders, Coll. Surf. A 197, 147 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    P. M. Claesson, P. Herder, P. Stenius, J. C. Eriksson, an d R. M. Pashley, An ESCA and AES study of ion-exchange on the basal plane of mica, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 109, 31 (1986)

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    Saville, Electrokinetic effects with small particle s, Annu

    D. Saville, Electrokinetic effects with small particle s, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9, 321 (1977)

    work page 1977

  44. [44]

    Van´ ysek, Electrochemical series, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 8, 8 (2000)

    P. Van´ ysek, Electrochemical series, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 8, 8 (2000)

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    Bernard, M

    O. Bernard, M. Jardat, B. Rotenberg, and P. Illien, On analytical theories for conductivity and self-diffusion in concentrated electrolytes, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 164105 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    O. I. Vinogradova and E. F. Silkina, Electrophoresis of ions and electrolyte conductivity: From bulk to nanochannels, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 174707 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    O. I. Vinogradova and E. F. Silkina, Conductivity of concentrated salt solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 163, 044501 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    J. C. Fair and J. F. Osterle, Reverse electrodialysis in charged capillary membranes, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 3307 (1971)

    work page 1971

  49. [49]

    O. I. Vinogradova, E. F. Silkina, and E. S. Asmolov, Slip - pery and mobile hydrophobic electrokinetics: from single walls to nanochannels, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 68, 101742 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    L. Joly, C. Ybert, E. Trizac, and L. Bocquet, Hydrody- namics within the electric double layer on slipping sur- faces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257805 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    E. F. Silkina, N. Bag, and O. I. Vinogradova, Electro- osmotic properties of porous permeable films, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 123701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    E. S. Asmolov, E. F. Silkina, and O. I. Vinogradova, En- hanced zeta potentials caused by surface ion mobilities, Phys. Fluids 37, 082118 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    B. J. Kirby and E. F. Hasselbrink Jr, Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental tech- niques, and effects on separations, Electrophoresis 25, 187 (2004)

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    S. Lee, J. Lee, and J. T. Ault, The role of variable zeta po - tential on diffusiophoretic and diffusioosmotic transport, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 659, 130775 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    O. I. Vinogradova, K. Koynov, A. Best, and F. Feuille- bois, Direct measurements of hydrophobic slippage using double-focus fluorescence cross-correlation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 118302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    J. T. Ault, S. Shin, and H. A. Stone, Diffusiophoresis in narrow channel flows, J. Fluid Mech. 854, 420 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    E. S. Asmolov and O. I. Vinogradova, Diffusiophoresis of ionic catalytic particles, Phys. Fluids 36, 092026 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    D. Y. Butylskii, L. Dammak, C. Larchet, N. D. Pismen- skaya, and V. V. Nikonenko, Selective recovery and re- utilization of lithium: Prospects for the use of membrane methods, Russ. Chem. Rev 92, 5074 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Marbach and L

    S. Marbach and L. Bocquet, Osmosis, from molecular insights to large-scale applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3102 (2019)

    work page 2019