pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.22609 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-27 · ✦ hep-lat · cond-mat.str-el· hep-th

Minimal-doubling and single-Weyl Hamiltonians

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat cond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords minimal doublingWeyl fermionslattice fermionssingle-node regimeGinsparg-Wilson relationspecies-splitting massHamiltonian formulationradiative corrections
0
0 comments X

The pith

Minimal-doubling lattice fermions produce single-Weyl Hamiltonians when supplemented by a species-splitting mass term, yet a symmetry-preserving one-parameter deformation causes extra Weyl nodes to appear past a critical value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs systematic Hamiltonian versions of minimally doubled fermions in three-plus-one dimensions and maps out their nodal structures together with the protecting symmetries for both Dirac and Weyl realizations. It obtains the single-Weyl Hamiltonians by adding a mass term that splits the doublers, then re-expresses the protection of the physical node through a Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation. A continuous family of deformations that keeps every symmetry intact is introduced; once the deformation parameter exceeds a definite critical value, new Weyl nodes appear and the system leaves the single-node regime. This shows that symmetry-allowed counterterms generated by radiative corrections can drive the lattice theory out of the desired single-Weyl phase unless moderate tuning is applied.

Core claim

Single-Weyl Hamiltonians are obtained from the minimal-doubling Hamiltonians by supplementing them with an appropriate species-splitting mass term. The non-onsite symmetry that protects the physical Weyl node is re-examined in the form of a Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation. A one-parameter family of deformations that preserves all symmetries is constructed; when the parameter exceeds a critical value, additional Weyl nodes emerge and the system exits the single-node regime. This indicates that, in interacting theories, radiative corrections can generate symmetry-allowed counterterms, so maintaining the desired single-Weyl phase generically requires moderate parameter tuning.

What carries the argument

A one-parameter family of symmetry-preserving deformations of the minimal-doubling Hamiltonian supplemented by a species-splitting mass term, which controls the number of Weyl nodes.

If this is right

  • The single-Weyl phase remains stable for a finite interval of the deformation parameter in the free theory.
  • Radiative corrections in interacting models can push the system out of the single-node regime unless the bare parameters are tuned.
  • The Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation continues to shield the physical Weyl node from perturbations that respect the underlying symmetry.
  • Symmetry patterns for four-component Dirac and two-component Weyl constructions are fully classified for all minimal-doubling Hamiltonians.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lattice simulations aiming for isolated Weyl nodes will need to monitor or compensate for deformation-like counterterms generated by interactions.
  • The same deformation technique can be applied to other lattice fermion discretizations to test the stability of their nodal structure.
  • The critical-value phenomenon may appear in condensed-matter models of Weyl semimetals when additional symmetry-allowed terms are included.

Load-bearing premise

The species-splitting mass term together with the one-parameter family of deformations faithfully represent the counterterms that radiative corrections would generate in interacting theories, and the Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation fully protects the single physical Weyl node.

What would settle it

Exact diagonalization or analytic solution of the deformed Hamiltonian showing that no additional nodes appear for all parameter values below the predicted critical point, or that nodes appear exactly at that critical value.

read the original abstract

We develop a systematic Hamiltonian formulation of minimally doubled lattice fermions in (3+1) dimensions, derive their nodal structures (structures of zeros), and classify their symmetry patterns for both four-component Dirac and two-component Weyl constructions. Motivated by recent single-Weyl proposals based on Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) representation, we argue that the corresponding single-Weyl Hamiltonians are obtained from the minimal-doubling Hamiltonians supplemented by an appropriate species-splitting mass term, and we re-examine the non-onsite symmetry protecting the physical Weyl node in terms of a Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation. We then construct a one-parameter family of deformations that preserves all the symmetries and demonstrate that, once the parameter exceeds a critical value, additional Weyl nodes emerge and the system exits the single-node regime. This indicates that in interacting theories radiative corrections can generate symmetry-allowed counterterms, so maintaining the desired single-Weyl phase generically requires "moderate" parameter tuning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a systematic Hamiltonian formulation of minimally doubled lattice fermions in (3+1) dimensions, derives their nodal structures and classifies symmetry patterns for both four-component Dirac and two-component Weyl constructions. It argues that single-Weyl Hamiltonians are obtained from minimal-doubling ones supplemented by a species-splitting mass term, re-examines the non-onsite symmetry protecting the physical Weyl node via a Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation, and constructs a one-parameter family of symmetry-preserving deformations. The central result is that beyond a critical value of the deformation parameter, additional Weyl nodes emerge, indicating that radiative corrections in interacting theories can generate symmetry-allowed counterterms that drive the system out of the single-node regime and require moderate tuning.

Significance. If the constructions and nodal analysis hold, the work provides a useful framework for realizing and stabilizing single-Weyl nodes on the lattice, with the Ginsparg-Wilson relation offering a symmetry-based protection mechanism. The explicit one-parameter deformation family and demonstration of node proliferation highlight a potential generic issue for lattice chiral fermions, though the link to actual radiative corrections remains assumptive rather than derived.

major comments (3)
  1. [discussion of the one-parameter family of deformations] The claim that radiative corrections generically generate counterterms within the one-parameter family (leading to extra nodes beyond the critical value) is not supported by any explicit perturbative calculation, such as a one-loop effective action or renormalization analysis; the family is constructed by hand to preserve symmetries, but it is not shown that loop corrections produce operators in this family rather than other allowed terms that might preserve the single node.
  2. [analysis of nodal structures under deformation] The emergence of additional Weyl nodes once the parameter exceeds the critical value is demonstrated within the constructed model, but the conclusion that this indicates generic behavior in interacting theories (requiring tuning) is model-dependent and lacks external validation or fitting to actual counterterms; the critical value is determined internally without reference to physical scales or other data.
  3. [construction of single-Weyl Hamiltonians and symmetry re-examination] While single-Weyl Hamiltonians are obtained by supplementing minimal-doubling ones with the species-splitting mass term and the Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation is re-examined for protection, the manuscript does not supply explicit lattice operator expressions or numerical checks to verify the nodal structure and symmetry protection hold for the deformed Hamiltonians.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction could benefit from an earlier explicit definition of the deformation parameter and the specific form of the species-splitting mass term to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the BdG representation.
  2. [introduction] Additional references to prior single-Weyl proposals in Bogoliubov-de Gennes representations would help contextualize the motivation and novelty of the Hamiltonian approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The claim that radiative corrections generically generate counterterms within the one-parameter family (leading to extra nodes beyond the critical value) is not supported by any explicit perturbative calculation, such as a one-loop effective action or renormalization analysis; the family is constructed by hand to preserve symmetries, but it is not shown that loop corrections produce operators in this family rather than other allowed terms that might preserve the single node.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript contains no explicit perturbative calculation of radiative corrections or renormalization-group flow. The one-parameter family is constructed explicitly to preserve the symmetries, and our statement is that symmetry-allowed counterterms of this form could be generated by interactions, potentially driving the system out of the single-node regime. We will revise the relevant paragraphs to clarify that this is a symmetry-based possibility rather than a result derived from loop calculations, and that explicit perturbative work would be needed to determine the actual coefficients in a given interacting theory. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The emergence of additional Weyl nodes once the parameter exceeds the critical value is demonstrated within the constructed model, but the conclusion that this indicates generic behavior in interacting theories (requiring tuning) is model-dependent and lacks external validation or fitting to actual counterterms; the critical value is determined internally without reference to physical scales or other data.

    Authors: The nodal analysis and the location of the critical value are performed within the specific one-parameter family we introduce. We present the result as an explicit example showing that symmetry-preserving deformations can produce additional nodes, thereby illustrating a potential mechanism that may require tuning in interacting realizations. We do not claim universality over all possible counterterms. In the revision we will add language that explicitly qualifies the result as model-dependent and illustrative, while retaining the observation as a cautionary point for lattice constructions of single-Weyl nodes. revision: partial

  3. Referee: While single-Weyl Hamiltonians are obtained by supplementing minimal-doubling ones with the species-splitting mass term and the Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation is re-examined for protection, the manuscript does not supply explicit lattice operator expressions or numerical checks to verify the nodal structure and symmetry protection hold for the deformed Hamiltonians.

    Authors: The general form of the deformed Hamiltonians is given in the main text together with the symmetry analysis. To strengthen the verification, we will add the explicit lattice-operator expressions for the one-parameter family and include numerical diagonalization results of the single-particle spectrum for several representative values of the deformation parameter (both below and above the critical value). These additions will explicitly confirm the nodal structure and the continued protection of the physical node via the Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations are direct mathematical constructions

full rationale

The paper constructs minimal-doubling Hamiltonians from first principles, derives nodal structures and symmetry classifications explicitly from the Hamiltonian definitions and Ginsparg-Wilson-type relations, and introduces a one-parameter family of deformations that is shown by direct calculation to preserve the listed symmetries while producing additional nodes beyond a critical parameter value. These steps reduce to algebraic and topological analysis of the given operators rather than to any self-referential input or fitted quantity. The remark that radiative corrections can generate symmetry-allowed counterterms is an interpretive statement outside the derivation chain and does not close any loop back to the model's own definitions. No self-citation load-bearing steps, self-definitional relations, or renamed empirical patterns appear in the load-bearing arguments.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard lattice discretization assumptions and symmetry classifications common to the field; the deformation parameter is introduced ad hoc to explore the single-node regime.

free parameters (1)
  • deformation parameter
    One-parameter family of symmetry-preserving deformations whose critical value controls the appearance of extra Weyl nodes.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ginsparg-Wilson-type relation protects the physical Weyl node via non-onsite symmetry
    Invoked to re-examine the symmetry protecting the single Weyl node.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1298 out tokens · 32776 ms · 2026-05-16T19:26:46.044371+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lattice fermion formulation via Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Ginsparg-Wilson relation and Overlap fermions

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Physics-informed neural networks construct overlap fermions by optimizing to the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and autonomously discover both the standard and generalized Fujikawa-type versions of the relation.

  2. Lattice fermion formulation via Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Ginsparg-Wilson relation and Overlap fermions

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Physics-Informed Neural Networks construct lattice Dirac operators satisfying the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, reproducing overlap fermions to high accuracy and discovering a Fujikawa-type generalized relation via algebr...

  3. Taste-splitting mass and edge modes in $3+1$ D staggered fermions

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A kink in a one-link mass term for 3+1D staggered fermions creates a 2+1D domain wall with two-flavor massless Dirac fermions protected by SU(2) and parity, realizing the parity anomaly from the UV lattice Hamiltonian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 53 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Twisted-ordering type 10 C

    Weyl fermion 8 B. Twisted-ordering type 10 C. Borici-Creutz type 11 D. Classification and Generalization 11 III. Chiral-symmetric single-Weyl Hamiltonians 12 A. Review of Gioia–Thorngren setup 13 B. Non-onsite chiral symmetry and GW relation 15 C. One-parameter deformation, extra nodes and need for tuning 16 IV. Conclusion and discussion 19 Acknowledgment...

  2. [2]

    Gamma matricesγ µ orα j =γ 0γj act on the Dirac spinor

    Dirac fermion We first consider a cubic spatial lattice with sitesx= (x, y, z)∈Z 3 and a four-component Dirac spinorψ x at each site with the periodic boundary condition. Gamma matricesγ µ orα j =γ 0γj act on the Dirac spinor. The position-space and momentum-space representations of the Dirac spinor have the relation ψx = Z π −π d3p (2π)3 eip·x ψp ,p= (p ...

  3. [3]

    single-Weyl

    Weyl fermion We now consider a two-component Weyl spinorχ x at each site. Pauli matricesσ 1,2,3 act on the Weyl spinor. The position-space and momentum-space representations are related asχ x = R π −π d3p (2π)3 eip·xχp. The massless and free KW Hamiltonian of the 2-component Weyl spinor is H W KW = Z π −π d3p (2π)3 χ† p hW KW(p)χ p ,(18) with hW KW(p) =σ ...

  4. [4]

    Confinement of Quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,”Phys. Rev.D10(1974) 2445–2459

  5. [5]

    Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory,

    M. Creutz, “Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory,”Phys. Rev.D21(1980) 2308–2315

  6. [6]

    Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Triangle Anomaly,

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit, “Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Triangle Anomaly,”Nucl. Phys. B183(1981) 103

  7. [7]

    Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory,” Nucl. Phys.B185(1981) 20

  8. [8]

    Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof,” Nucl. Phys.B193(1981) 173–194

  9. [9]

    No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,”Phys. Lett. 105B(1981) 219–223

  10. [10]

    Quarks and Strings on a Lattice,

    K. G. Wilson, “Quarks and Strings on a Lattice,” inNew Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics: Proceedings, International School of Subnuclear Physics, Erice, Sicily, Jul 11-Aug 1 1975. Part A, pp. 69–142. 1975.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4208-3_6

  11. [11]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev.D11(1975) 395–408

  12. [12]

    Lattice Fermions,

    L. Susskind, “Lattice Fermions,”Phys. Rev.D16(1977) 3031–3039

  13. [13]

    Kajantie, L

    N. Kawamoto and J. Smit, “Effective Lagrangian and Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Strongly Coupled Lattice QCD,”Nucl. Phys. B192no. 1, (1981) 100–124. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321381901966

  14. [14]

    Susskind Fermions on a Euclidean Lattice,

    H. S. Sharatchandra, H. J. Thun, and P. Weisz, “Susskind Fermions on a Euclidean Lattice,”Nucl. Phys.B192(1981) 205–236. 24

  15. [15]

    Selfenergy and Flavor Interpretation of Staggered Fermions,

    M. F. Golterman and J. Smit, “Selfenergy and Flavor Interpretation of Staggered Fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B245(1984) 61–88

  16. [16]

    STAGGERED MESONS,

    M. F. Golterman, “STAGGERED MESONS,”Nucl. Phys. B273(1986) 663–676

  17. [17]

    A Tool Kit for Staggered Fermions,

    G. Kilcup and S. R. Sharpe, “A Tool Kit for Staggered Fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B283(1987) 493–550

  18. [18]

    A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice

    D. B. Kaplan, “A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice,”Phys. Lett.B288(1992) 342–347,arXiv:hep-lat/9206013 [hep-lat]

  19. [19]

    Chiral Fermions from Lattice Boundaries

    Y. Shamir, “Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries,”Nucl. Phys.B406(1993) 90–106, arXiv:hep-lat/9303005 [hep-lat]

  20. [20]

    Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions

    V. Furman and Y. Shamir, “Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B 439(1995) 54–78,arXiv:hep-lat/9405004

  21. [21]

    More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice

    H. Neuberger, “More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,”Phys. Lett.B427(1998) 353–355, arXiv:hep-lat/9801031 [hep-lat]

  22. [22]

    A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,”Phys. Rev.D25 (1982) 2649

  23. [23]

    Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation

    M. Luscher, “Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,”Phys. Lett. B 428(1998) 342–345,arXiv:hep-lat/9802011

  24. [24]

    The Scaling of Exact and Approximate Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions

    W. Bietenholz and I. Hip, “The Scaling of exact and approximate Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 423–451,arXiv:hep-lat/9902019

  25. [25]

    Index Theorem and Overlap Formalism with Naive and Minimally Doubled Fermions

    M. Creutz, T. Kimura, and T. Misumi, “Index Theorem and Overlap Formalism with Naive and Minimally Doubled Fermions,”JHEP12(2010) 041,arXiv:1011.0761 [hep-lat]

  26. [26]

    Brillouin improvement for Wilson fermions

    S. D¨ urr and G. Koutsou, “Brillouin improvement for Wilson fermions,”Phys. Rev. D83(Jun, 2011) 114512,arXiv:1012.3615 [hep-lat].https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114512

  27. [27]

    Meson and Baryon dispersion relations with Brillouin fermions

    S. D¨ urr, G. Koutsou, and T. Lippert, “Meson and Baryon dispersion relations with Brillouin fermions,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 114514,arXiv:1208.6270 [hep-lat]

  28. [28]

    New fermion discretizations and their applications

    T. Misumi, “New fermion discretizations and their applications,”PoSLATTICE2012(2012) 005, arXiv:1211.6999 [hep-lat]

  29. [29]

    $O(a^2)$-improved actions for heavy quarks and scaling studies on quenched lattices

    Y.-G. Cho, S. Hashimoto, J.-I. Noaki, A. Juttner, and M. Marinkovic, “O(a 2)-improved actions for heavy quarks and scaling studies on quenched lattices,”PoSLATTICE2013(2014) 255, arXiv:1312.4630 [hep-lat]

  30. [30]

    Improved lattice fermion action for heavy quarks

    Y.-G. Cho, S. Hashimoto, A. Juttner, T. Kaneko, M. Marinkovic, J.-I. Noaki, and J. T. Tsang, “Improved lattice fermion action for heavy quarks,”JHEP05(2015) 072,arXiv:1504.01630 [hep-lat]

  31. [31]

    On the suitability of the Brillouin action as a kernel to the overlap procedure

    S. D¨ urr and G. Koutsou, “On the suitability of the Brillouin action as a kernel to the overlap procedure,”arXiv:1701.00726 [hep-lat]

  32. [32]

    Theoretical foundation for the Index Theorem on the lattice with staggered fermions

    D. H. Adams, “Theoretical foundation for the index theorem on the lattice with staggered fermions,” Phys.Rev.Lett.104(2010) 141602,arXiv:0912.2850 [hep-lat]

  33. [33]

    Pairs of chiral quarks on the lattice from staggered fermions

    D. H. Adams, “Pairs of chiral quarks on the lattice from staggered fermions,”Phys.Lett.B699(2011) 25 394–397,arXiv:1008.2833 [hep-lat]

  34. [34]

    Single flavor staggered fermions

    C. Hoelbling, “Single flavor staggered fermions,”Phys.Lett.B696(2011) 422–425,arXiv:1009.5362 [hep-lat]

  35. [35]

    Numerical properties of staggered overlap fermions

    P. de Forcrand, A. Kurkela, and M. Panero, “Numerical properties of staggered overlap fermions,” PoSLATTICE2010(2010) 080,arXiv:1102.1000 [hep-lat]

  36. [36]

    Aoki Phases in the Lattice Gross-Neveu Model with Flavored Mass terms

    M. Creutz, T. Kimura, and T. Misumi, “Aoki Phases in the Lattice Gross-Neveu Model with Flavored Mass terms,”Phys. Rev.D83(2011) 094506,arXiv:1101.4239 [hep-lat]

  37. [37]

    Aoki Phases in Staggered-Wilson Fermions

    T. Misumi, M. Creutz, T. Kimura, T. Z. Nakano, and A. Ohnishi, “Aoki Phases in Staggered-Wilson Fermions,”PoSLATTICE2011(2011) 108,arXiv:1110.1231 [hep-lat]

  38. [38]

    Spectral Flow and Index Theorem for Staggered Fermions

    E. Follana, V. Azcoiti, G. Di Carlo, and A. Vaquero, “Spectral Flow and Index Theorem for Staggered Fermions,”PoSLATTICE2011(2011) 100,arXiv:1111.3502 [hep-lat]

  39. [39]

    Numerical properties of staggered quarks with a taste-dependent mass term

    P. de Forcrand, A. Kurkela, and M. Panero, “Numerical properties of staggered quarks with a taste-dependent mass term,”JHEP04(2012) 142,arXiv:1202.1867 [hep-lat]

  40. [40]

    Strong-coupling Analysis of Parity Phase Structure in Staggered-Wilson Fermions

    T. Misumi, T. Z. Nakano, T. Kimura, and A. Ohnishi, “Strong-coupling analysis of parity phase structure in staggered-wilson fermions,”Phys.Rev.D86(2012) 034501,arXiv:1205.6545 [hep-lat]

  41. [41]

    Taste-split staggered actions: eigenvalues, chiralities and Symanzik improvement

    S. D¨ urr, “Taste-split staggered actions: eigenvalues, chiralities and Symanzik improvement,”Phys. Rev. D87(Jun, 2013) 114501,arXiv:1302.0773 [hep-lat]. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.114501

  42. [42]

    Spectral properties and chiral symmetry violations of (staggered) domain wall fermions in the Schwinger model

    C. Hoelbling and C. Zielinski, “Spectral properties and chiral symmetry violations of (staggered) domain wall fermions in the Schwinger model,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 1, (2016) 014501, arXiv:1602.08432 [hep-lat]

  43. [43]

    Theoretical and Computational Aspects of New Lattice Fermion Formulations

    C. Zielinski,Theoretical and Computational Aspects of New Lattice Fermion Formulations. PhD thesis, Nanyang Technol. U., 2016.arXiv:1703.06364 [hep-lat]

  44. [44]

    Revisiting symmetries of lattice fermions via spin-flavor representation

    T. Kimura, S. Komatsu, T. Misumi, T. Noumi, S. Torii, and S. Aoki, “Revisiting symmetries of lattice fermions via spin-flavor representation,”JHEP01(2012) 048,arXiv:1111.0402 [hep-lat]

  45. [45]

    Many avatars of the Wilson fermion: A perturbative analysis

    A. Chowdhury, A. Harindranath, J. Maiti, and S. Mondal, “Many avatars of the wilson fermion: A perturbative analysis,”JHEP02(2013) 037,arXiv:1301.0675 [hep-lat]

  46. [46]

    Lattice gauge theory for Haldane conjecture and central-branch Wilson fermion,

    T. Misumi and Y. Tanizaki, “Lattice gauge theory for Haldane conjecture and central-branch Wilson fermion,”PTEP2020no. 3, (2020) 033B03,arXiv:1910.09604 [hep-lat]

  47. [47]

    Varieties and properties of central-branch Wilson fermions,

    T. Misumi and J. Yumoto, “Varieties and properties of central-branch Wilson fermions,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 3, (2020) 034516,arXiv:2005.08857 [hep-lat]

  48. [48]

    Lattice Fermions in Euclidean Space-time,

    L. H. Karsten, “Lattice Fermions in Euclidean Space-time,”Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 315–319

  49. [49]

    ON LATTICE FERMIONS,

    F. Wilczek, “ON LATTICE FERMIONS,”Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 2397

  50. [50]

    Four-dimensional graphene and chiral fermions

    M. Creutz, “Four-dimensional graphene and chiral fermions,”JHEP04(2008) 017,arXiv:0712.1201 [hep-lat]

  51. [51]

    Creutz Fermions on an Orthogonal Lattice

    A. Borici, “Creutz fermions on an orthogonal lattice,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 074504, arXiv:0712.4401 [hep-lat]. 26

  52. [52]

    Broken Symmetries from Minimally Doubled Fermions

    P. F. Bedaque, M. I. Buchoff, B. C. Tiburzi, and A. Walker-Loud, “Broken Symmetries from Minimally Doubled Fermions,”Phys. Lett. B662(2008) 449–455,arXiv:0801.3361 [hep-lat]

  53. [53]

    Search for Fermion Actions on Hyperdiamond Lattices

    P. F. Bedaque, M. I. Buchoff, B. C. Tiburzi, and A. Walker-Loud, “Search for Fermion Actions on Hyperdiamond Lattices,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 017502,arXiv:0804.1145 [hep-lat]

  54. [54]

    Minimally doubled fermions at one loop

    S. Capitani, J. Weber, and H. Wittig, “Minimally doubled fermions at one loop,”Phys. Lett. B681 (2009) 105–112,arXiv:0907.2825 [hep-lat]

  55. [55]

    Characters of Lattice Fermions Based on the Hyperdiamond Lattice

    T. Kimura and T. Misumi, “Characters of Lattice Fermions Based on the Hyperdiamond Lattice,” Prog. Theor. Phys.124(2010) 415–432,arXiv:0907.1371 [hep-lat]

  56. [56]

    Lattice Fermions Based on Higher-Dimensional Hyperdiamond Lattices

    T. Kimura and T. Misumi, “Lattice Fermions Based on Higher-Dimensional Hyperdiamond Lattices,” Prog. Theor. Phys.123(2010) 63–78,arXiv:0907.3774 [hep-lat]

  57. [57]

    Classification of Minimally Doubled Fermions

    M. Creutz and T. Misumi, “Classification of Minimally Doubled Fermions,”Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 074502,arXiv:1007.3328 [hep-lat]

  58. [58]

    Minimal doubling and point splitting

    M. Creutz, “Minimal doubling and point splitting,”PoSLATTICE2010(2010) 078, arXiv:1009.3154 [hep-lat]

  59. [59]

    Renormalization of minimally doubled fermions

    S. Capitani, M. Creutz, J. Weber, and H. Wittig, “Renormalization of minimally doubled fermions,” JHEP09(2010) 027,arXiv:1006.2009 [hep-lat]

  60. [60]

    Chiral Lattice Fermions, Minimal Doubling, and the Axial Anomaly

    B. C. Tiburzi, “Chiral Lattice Fermions, Minimal Doubling, and the Axial Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D 82(2010) 034511,arXiv:1006.0172 [hep-lat]

  61. [61]

    Minimal Doubling Fermion and Hermiticity

    S. Kamata and H. Tanaka, “Minimal Doubling Fermion and Hermiticity,”PTEP2013(2013) 023B05,arXiv:1111.4536 [hep-lat]

  62. [62]

    Phase structure for lattice fermions with flavored chemical potential terms

    T. Misumi, “Phase structure for lattice fermions with flavored chemical potential terms,”JHEP08 (2012) 068,arXiv:1206.0969 [hep-lat]

  63. [63]

    QCD phase diagram with 2-flavor lattice fermion formulations

    T. Misumi, T. Kimura, and A. Ohnishi, “QCD phase diagram with 2-flavor lattice fermion formulations,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 094505,arXiv:1206.1977 [hep-lat]

  64. [64]

    Reducing the number of counterterms with new minimally doubled actions

    S. Capitani, “Reducing the number of counterterms with new minimally doubled actions,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 1, (2014) 014501,arXiv:1307.7497 [hep-lat]

  65. [65]

    New chiral lattice actions of the Borici-Creutz type

    S. Capitani, “New chiral lattice actions of the Borici-Creutz type,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 7, (2014) 074508,arXiv:1311.5664 [hep-lat]

  66. [66]

    Fermion Actions extracted from Lattice Super Yang-Mills Theories

    T. Misumi, “Fermion Actions extracted from Lattice Super Yang-Mills Theories,”JHEP12(2013) 063,arXiv:1311.4365 [hep-lat]

  67. [67]

    Numerical studies of Minimally Doubled Fermions

    J. H. Weber, S. Capitani, and H. Wittig, “Numerical studies of Minimally Doubled Fermions,”PoS LATTICE2013(2014) 122,arXiv:1312.0488 [hep-lat]

  68. [68]

    J. H. Weber,Properties of minimally doubled fermions. PhD thesis, Mainz U., 2015. arXiv:1706.07104 [hep-lat]

  69. [69]

    Dispersion relation and spectral range of Karsten-Wilczek and Borici-Creutz fermions,

    S. D¨ urr and J. H. Weber, “Dispersion relation and spectral range of Karsten-Wilczek and Borici-Creutz fermions,”Phys. Rev. D102(Jul, 2020) 014516,arXiv:2003.10803 [hep-lat]. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014516. 27

  70. [70]

    Electronic Structure of Pyrochlore Iridates: From Topological Dirac Metal to Mott Insulator

    X. Wan, A. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, “Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates,”Phys. Rev. B83no. 20, (2011) 205101,arXiv:1007.0016 [cond-mat.str-el]

  71. [71]

    Exact Chiral Symmetries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions

    L. Gioia and R. Thorngren, “Exact Chiral Symmetries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions,” arXiv:2503.07708 [cond-mat.str-el]

  72. [72]

    A new fermion Hamiltonian for lattice gauge theory

    M. Creutz, I. Horvath, and H. Neuberger, “A New fermion Hamiltonian for lattice gauge theory,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.106(2002) 760–762,arXiv:hep-lat/0110009

  73. [73]

    Algebraic Generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson Relation

    K. Fujikawa, “Algebraic generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,”Nucl. Phys. B589(2000) 487–503,arXiv:hep-lat/0004012

  74. [74]

    Toward a Ginsparg-Wilson lattice Hamiltonian,

    M. Clancy, “Toward a Ginsparg-Wilson lattice Hamiltonian,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 1, (2024) L011502,arXiv:2312.08647 [hep-lat]

  75. [75]

    Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations,

    M. Clancy, D. B. Kaplan, and H. Singh, “Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations,”Phys. Rev. D109 no. 1, (2024) 014502,arXiv:2309.08542 [hep-lat]

  76. [76]

    A No-Go Result for Implementing Chiral Symmetries by Locality-Preserving Unitaries in a Three-Dimensional Hamiltonian Lattice Model of Fermions,

    L. Fidkowski and C. Xu, “A No-Go Result for Implementing Chiral Symmetries by Locality-Preserving Unitaries in a Three-Dimensional Hamiltonian Lattice Model of Fermions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131no. 19, (2023) 196601,arXiv:2306.10105 [cond-mat.str-el]

  77. [77]

    Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Improved Chiral Symmetry,

    H. Singh, “Ginsparg-Wilson Hamiltonians with Improved Chiral Symmetry,”arXiv:2505.20419 [hep-lat]

  78. [78]

    Equivalence class of Emergent Single Weyl fermion lattice models in 3 dimensions: gapless superconductors and superfluids versus chiral fermions

    G. Meyniel and F. Zhou, “Equivalent class of Emergent Single Weyl Fermion in 3d Topological States: gapless superconductors and superfluids Vs chiral fermions,”arXiv:2510.25959 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    Quan- tized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,

    A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, “Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 2, (2025) 021601,arXiv:2409.12220 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    Non-singlet conserved charges and anomalies in 3+1 D staggered fermions,

    T. Onogi and T. Yamaoka, “Non-singlet conserved charges and anomalies in 3+1 D staggered fermions,”arXiv:2509.04906 [hep-lat]

Showing first 80 references.