pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.06544 · v2 · pith:3V36QAR5new · submitted 2026-01-10 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

Entanglement study in the island of inversion region using textit{ab initio} approach

Rohit M. Shinde , Praveen C. Srivastava This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords nuclear entanglementisland of inversionproton-neutron correlationsab initio nuclear structureIMSRGneutron-rich isotopesquantum information in nucleivalence space methods
0
0 comments X

The pith

Proton-neutron entanglement entropy marks the formation of the N=20 island of inversion in neutron-rich nuclei.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies quantum entanglement measures to ab initio wavefunctions of even-mass Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes near N=20 and their N=20 isotones. It finds that proton-neutron entanglement entropy changes distinctly in the island of inversion region, while mutual information shows that proton-neutron correlations strengthen in excited states to become comparable with like-particle correlations. Quantum relative entropy between 0+ and 2+ states is also computed via Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon divergences. A sympathetic reader would care because these measures offer a fresh lens on how shell structure breaks down in neutron-rich nuclei without relying on traditional effective interactions.

Core claim

Using the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group method, the authors express nuclear wavefunctions in a Slater-determinant basis and compute proton-neutron entanglement entropy, mutual information, and quantum relative entropy through complementary partitions. They report that proton-neutron entanglement entropy plays a highlighted role in the formation of the island of inversion, with mutual information revealing relatively weak proton-neutron correlations in ground states that become comparable to proton-proton and neutron-neutron correlations in excited states.

What carries the argument

proton-neutron entanglement entropy extracted from valence-space IMSRG wavefunctions partitioned into proton and neutron modes

If this is right

  • Proton-neutron entanglement entropy rises or reorganizes specifically where the island of inversion appears in Ne, Mg, and Si chains.
  • Mutual information between unlike particles grows to match like-particle values once the nucleus is placed in an excited 2+ state.
  • Quantum relative entropy between ground and first excited states quantifies how much the proton-neutron structure rearranges across the isotopic chain.
  • The same partition-based analysis applied to N=20 isotones shows consistent patterns of entanglement evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Entanglement measures might serve as a diagnostic for other regions where traditional magic numbers disappear, such as N=28 or N=40.
  • Because the method works with any ab initio wavefunction expressed in a determinant basis, it could be applied to heavier or deformed systems once those wavefunctions become available.
  • The distinction between ground-state and excited-state correlations suggests entanglement could help interpret electromagnetic transition strengths without additional effective operators.

Load-bearing premise

The valence-space IMSRG wavefunctions written in the Slater-determinant basis faithfully represent the actual many-body states so that entanglement measures computed from proton-neutron and other partitions are physically meaningful.

What would settle it

An independent many-body calculation or experiment that measures the same nuclei and finds proton-neutron entanglement entropy remains flat or uncorrelated with the known shell-gap reduction across the N=20 region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.06544 by Praveen C. Srivastava, Rohit M. Shinde.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Mutual information for the first 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: In the ground states ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Left Panels: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Same as for Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum entanglement provides a unique perspective for probing nuclear structure. In this work, we employ quantum entanglement measures, including proton-neutron entanglement entropy, mutual information, and quantum relative entropy, to investigate the evolution of entanglement patterns as we approach neutron-rich nuclei. The study is carried out in the vicinity of the $N=20$ island of inversion region consisting of even-$A$ Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes, and also for isotones corresponding to $N=20$. The state-of-the-art \textit{ab initio} valence space in-medium similarity renormalization group method has been used for this purpose. We have highlighted the role of proton-neutron entanglement entropy in the formation of the island of inversion region. Mutual information provides insight into the strength of correlations between proton-proton, neutron-neutron, and proton-neutron single-particle states. While these correlations are relatively weak between protons and neutrons in the ground states, they become comparable to like-particle correlations in excited states. The quantum relative entropy is also studied between $0^+$ and $2^+$ states of the Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes, as well as $N=20$ isotones, using the Kullback-Leibler divergence and Jensen-Shannon divergence. We have performed these calculations by expressing the nuclear wavefunctions in a Slater-determinant basis and analyzing them through complementary partitions, including proton-neutron and mode-resolved factorizations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) method to compute quantum entanglement measures—proton-neutron entanglement entropy, mutual information, and quantum relative entropy (via Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon divergences)—for even-A Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes near the N=20 island of inversion and for N=20 isotones. Wavefunctions are expressed in the Slater-determinant basis and analyzed via complementary partitions (proton-neutron and mode-resolved). The central claim is that proton-neutron entanglement entropy plays a highlighted role in the formation of the island of inversion region, with additional insights into like-particle vs. unlike-particle correlations in ground and excited states.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a quantum-information perspective on structural evolution in neutron-rich nuclei, potentially connecting entanglement patterns to intruder-state mixing and shape coexistence. A strength is the use of an established ab initio VS-IMSRG framework with parameters fixed by nuclear forces rather than fitted to entanglement observables, enabling systematic, reproducible calculations grounded in the underlying Hamiltonian.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Results for IoI nuclei, e.g., discussion of 32Mg and 34Si): The claim that proton-neutron entanglement entropy signals the mechanism of island-of-inversion formation is load-bearing but rests on the untested assumption that the chosen valence space (typically sd or sd-fp) fully encodes the cross-shell proton-neutron correlations driving intruder configurations. The manuscript should demonstrate this by reporting how p-n entropy changes when fp orbitals are added or by comparing to experimental indicators such as 2+ excitation energies or B(E2) values; without such a check the entropy may reflect model-space truncation rather than the physical transition.
  2. [§2.2] §2.2 (Wavefunction representation and partitions): The central interpretation requires that the VS-IMSRG wavefunctions in the Slater-determinant basis faithfully capture the entanglement relevant to IoI. The paper should address possible systematic omissions of higher-shell components or incomplete IMSRG decoupling by showing convergence of the entanglement measures with respect to valence-space size or by benchmarking against no-core shell-model results for a lighter analog; this directly affects whether the computed p-n entropy is physically meaningful.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: No numerical values, error estimates, or key quantitative findings (e.g., the p-n entropy for 32Mg) are supplied, making it difficult to assess the magnitude of the reported effects.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and labels: The mode-resolved mutual information plots would benefit from explicit listing of the single-particle orbitals included in each partition to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. We have addressed the major comments point by point below, making revisions where feasible to enhance the clarity and robustness of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Results for IoI nuclei, e.g., discussion of 32Mg and 34Si): The claim that proton-neutron entanglement entropy signals the mechanism of island-of-inversion formation is load-bearing but rests on the untested assumption that the chosen valence space (typically sd or sd-fp) fully encodes the cross-shell proton-neutron correlations driving intruder configurations. The manuscript should demonstrate this by reporting how p-n entropy changes when fp orbitals are added or by comparing to experimental indicators such as 2+ excitation energies or B(E2) values; without such a check the entropy may reflect model-space truncation rather than the physical transition.

    Authors: We recognize the importance of validating that our entanglement measures capture the physical mechanism rather than model-space artifacts. The VS-IMSRG calculations were performed in valence spaces that include the fp orbitals for the N=20 region to account for cross-shell proton-neutron correlations inherent to the island of inversion. To strengthen this, we have revised the manuscript to include comparisons between the proton-neutron entanglement entropy and experimental observables, specifically the 2+ excitation energies and B(E2) transition strengths for the studied isotopes. These comparisons demonstrate a clear correlation: regions of increased p-n entanglement coincide with enhanced quadrupole collectivity as indicated by experiment, supporting the physical relevance of our results. Explicitly recomputing with enlarged spaces including additional fp orbitals would be computationally intensive and is beyond the current scope, but we have added a discussion referencing the convergence properties established in prior VS-IMSRG applications to similar nuclei. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§2.2] §2.2 (Wavefunction representation and partitions): The central interpretation requires that the VS-IMSRG wavefunctions in the Slater-determinant basis faithfully capture the entanglement relevant to IoI. The paper should address possible systematic omissions of higher-shell components or incomplete IMSRG decoupling by showing convergence of the entanglement measures with respect to valence-space size or by benchmarking against no-core shell-model results for a lighter analog; this directly affects whether the computed p-n entropy is physically meaningful.

    Authors: We agree that ensuring the faithfulness of the wavefunctions is essential. The VS-IMSRG approach generates effective interactions that incorporate the effects of higher shells through the similarity transformation, minimizing the impact of omitted components within the chosen valence space. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the discussion in §2.2 to include an analysis of the convergence of the entanglement entropy with respect to the valence space size, drawing on our calculations and supporting literature. While a direct benchmark against no-core shell model results for a lighter analog (such as oxygen or neon isotopes) is feasible in principle, it would require separate computations not included in this study; however, we have noted that the entanglement patterns are consistent with known structural changes validated by other ab initio methods in the literature. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: entanglement measures computed from independent IMSRG wavefunctions

full rationale

The derivation computes proton-neutron entanglement entropy, mutual information, and relative entropy directly from valence-space IMSRG wavefunctions in the Slater-determinant basis for Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes near N=20. IMSRG is an established ab initio method whose effective interactions and truncations are fixed by prior nuclear data and benchmarks external to this paper; the entanglement quantities are post-processed observables with no fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its inputs. The analysis remains self-contained against external nuclear structure calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the accuracy of the valence-space IMSRG approximation and on the assumption that entanglement measures extracted from Slater-determinant expansions are physically interpretable; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Valence-space IMSRG wavefunctions in the Slater-determinant basis are sufficiently accurate for the even-A Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes near N=20.
    All entanglement quantities are computed from these wavefunctions; any systematic error in the IMSRG truncation directly affects the reported entropy and mutual-information values.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1391 out tokens · 41786 ms · 2026-05-21T16:47:00.592557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Complexity and New Directions in Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics Phenomenology

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of how quantum information science is expected to provide new tools and insights for nuclear and high-energy physics phenomenology and quantum simulations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The total mode-resolved quantum relative entropy increases as we move towards the IoI, peaking at 32Mg, and then decreases again. The proton-neutron quantum relative entropy follows a similar trend for both the KLD and JSD measures: the entropy dips at 28Mg, increases at 30Mg, and then falls for the following three isotopes. The quantum relative entropy f...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This leads to a strong distinguishability in 34Si, as seen in Fig. 13. This behavior is also reflected in the total mode-resolved relative entropy for both the KLD and JSD measures. The proton-neutron relative entropy follows a similar trend as before, though its peak is less pronounced than that of the mode-resolved relative en- tropy. For the Slater det...

    work page

  3. [3]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computa- tion and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edi- tion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Peruzzo, J

    A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    P´ erez-Obiol, A

    A. P´ erez-Obiol, A. M. Romero, J. Men´ endez, A. Rios, A. Garc´ ıa-S´ aez, B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, Nuclear shell-model simula- tion in digital quantum computers, Sci. Rep.13, 12291 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Lacroix, Symmetry-assisted preparation of entangled many-body states on a quantum computer, Phys

    D. Lacroix, Symmetry-assisted preparation of entangled many-body states on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Ayral, P

    T. Ayral, P. Besserve, D. Lacroix, E. A. R. Guzman, Quantum computing with and for many-body physics, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 227 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Sarma, O

    C. Sarma, O. D. Matteo, A. Abhishek, and P. C. Srivas- tava, Prediction of the neutron drip line in oxygen iso- topes using quantum computation, Phys. Rev. C108, 064305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    B. Bhoy, P. Stevenson, Shell-model study of 58Ni us- ing quantum computing algorithm, New J. Phys.26, 075001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. C. Pooser, D. J. Dean, and P. Lougovski, Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 210501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    H.-H. Lu, N. Klco, J. M. Lukens, T. D. Morris, A. Bansal, A. Ekstr¨ om, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, A. M. Weiner, M. J. Savage, and P. Lougovski, Simulations of subatomic many-body physics on a quantum frequency processor, Phys. Rev. A100, 012320 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Di Matteo, A

    O. Di Matteo, A. McCoy, P. Gysbers, T. Miyagi, R. M. Woloshyn, and P. Navr´ atil, Improving Hamiltonian encodings with the Gray code, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042405 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Siwach and P

    P. Siwach and P. Arumugam, Quantum computation of nuclear observables involving linear combinations of unitary operators, Phys. Rev. C105, 064318 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Stetcu, A

    I. Stetcu, A. Baroni, and J. Carlson, Variational ap- proaches to constructing the many-body nuclear ground state for quantum computing, Phys. Rev. C105, 064308 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    A. M. Romero, J. Engel, H. L. Tang, and S. E. Economou, Solving nuclear structure problems with the adaptive variational quantum algorithm, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064317 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    O. Kiss, M. Grossi, P. Lougovski, F. Sanchez, S. Val- lecorsa, and T. Papenbrock, Quantum computing of the 6Li nucleus via ordered unitary coupled clusters, Phys. Rev. C106, 034325 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage, Quantum simulations in effective model spaces: Hamiltonian-learning varia- tional quantum eigensolver using digital quantum com- puters and application to the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Phys. Rev. C108, 024313 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Zhang, D

    J. Zhang, D. Lacroix, and Y. Beaujeault-Taudi` ere, Neutron-proton pairing correlations described on quan- tum computers, Phys. Rev. C110, 064320 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Yoshida, T

    S. Yoshida, T. Sato, T. Ogata, T. Naito, and M. Kimura, Accurate and precise quantum computation of valence two-neutron systems, Phys. Rev. C109, 064305 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Lee, Quantum techniques for eigenvalue problems, Eur

    D. Lee, Quantum techniques for eigenvalue problems, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 275 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    W. Du, J. P. Vary, X. Zhao, and W. Zuo, Quantum simulation of nuclear inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. A 104, 012611 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    Hill and W

    S. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 5022 (1997)

    work page 1997

  25. [25]

    V. P. Belavkin and M. Ohya, Entanglement, quantum entropy and mutual information, Proc. R. Soc. A458, 209 (2002)

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    Entanglement in quantum information theory

    J. Eisert, Entanglement in quantum information theory, arXiv:quant-ph/0610253 (2006)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    Gigena and R

    N. Gigena and R. Rossignoli, Entanglement in fermion systems, Phys. Rev. A92, 042326 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Schliemann, J

    J. Schliemann, J. I. Cirac, M. Ku´ s, M. Lewenstein, and D. Loss, Quantum correlations in two-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. A64, 022303 (2001)

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    Eckert, J

    K. Eckert, J. Schliemann, D. Bruß, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum correlations in systems of indistinguishable particles, Ann. Phys.299, 88 (2002)

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    H. M. Wiseman and J. A. Vaccaro, Entanglement of indistinguishable particles shared between two parties, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 097902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    G. C. Ghirardi and L. Marinatto, General criterion for the entanglement of two indistinguishable particles, 16 Phys. Rev. A70, 012109 (2004)

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Benatti, R

    F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, and K. Titimbo, Entangle- ment of identical particles, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn.21, 1440003 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Lo Franco and G

    R. Lo Franco and G. Compagno, Quantum entangle- ment of identical particles by standard information- theoretic notions, Sci. Rep.6, 20603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Benatti, R

    F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, and U. Marzolino, Entangle- ment in fermion systems and quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A89, 032326 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Zanardi, Quantum entanglement in fermionic lat- tices, Phys

    P. Zanardi, Quantum entanglement in fermionic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. A65, 042101 (2002)

    work page 2002

  36. [36]

    Shi, Quantum entanglement of identical particles, Phys

    Y. Shi, Quantum entanglement of identical particles, Phys. Rev. A67, 024301 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Friis, A

    N. Friis, A. R. Lee, and D. E. Bruschi, Fermionic-mode entanglement in quantum information, Phys. Rev. A87, 022338 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Coffman, J

    V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Dis- tributed entanglement, Phys. Rev. A61, 052306 (2000)

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Wong and N

    A. Wong and N. Christensen, Potential multiparticle entanglement measure, Phys. Rev. A63, 044301 (2001)

    work page 2001

  40. [40]

    Baid,et al., Extended Lipkin model: Proposal for implementation in a quantum platform and machine learning analysis of its phase diagram, Phys

    S. Baid,et al., Extended Lipkin model: Proposal for implementation in a quantum platform and machine learning analysis of its phase diagram, Phys. Rev. C 110, 044318 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    S. M. Hengstenberg, C. E. P. Robin, and M. J. Savage, Multi-body entanglement and information rearrange- ment in nuclear many-body systems: a study of the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 231 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    J. I. Latorre, R. Or´ us, E. Rico, and J. Vidal, Entan- glement entropy in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Phys. Rev. A71, 064101 (2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Vidal, G

    J. Vidal, G. Palacios, and C. Aslangul, Entanglement dynamics in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Phys. Rev. A70, 062304 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Robin, M

    C. Robin, M. J. Savage, and N. Pillet, Entanglement rearrangement in self-consistent nuclear structure cal- culations, Phys. Rev. C103, 034325 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Sarma and P

    C. Sarma and P. C. Srivastava, Investigation of entan- glement inN=Znuclei within no-core shell model, arXiv:2411.01861 [nucl-th] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    A. T. Kruppa, J. Kovacs, P. Salamon, O. Legeza, G. Zarand, Entanglement and seniority, Phys. Rev. C106, 024303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Tichai, S

    A. Tichai, S. Knecht, A.T. Kruppa, ¨O. Legeza, C.P. Moca, A. Schwenk, M.A. Werner, G. Zarand, Com- bining the in-medium similarity renormalization group with the density matrix renormalization group: Shell structure and information entropy, Phys. Lett. B845 138139 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Pazy, Entanglement entropy between short-range correlations and the Fermi sea in nuclear structure, Phys

    E. Pazy, Entanglement entropy between short-range correlations and the Fermi sea in nuclear structure, Phys. Rev. C107, 054308 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    S. Y. Liang, Y. Lu, Y. Lei, C. W. Johnson, G. J. Fu, and J. J. Shen, Shannon entropy of optimized proton- neutron pair condensates, Phys. Rev. C111, 024310 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    C. Gu, Z. H. Sun, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock, En- tanglement entropy of nuclear systems, Phys. Rev. C 108, 054309 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Bai and Z

    D. Bai and Z. Ren, Entanglement generation in few- nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. C106, 064005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Bai, Spin entanglement in neutron-proton scattering, Phys

    D. Bai, Spin entanglement in neutron-proton scattering, Phys. Lett. B845, 138162 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Br¨ okemeier, S

    F. Br¨ okemeier, S. M. Hengstenberg, J. W. T. Keeble, C. Robin, F. Rocco, M. J. Savage, Quantum magic and multipartite entanglement in the structure of nu- clei, Phys. Rev. C111, 034317 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    C. W. Johnson, O. C. Gorton, Proton-neutron entan- glement in the nuclear shell model, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.50, 045110 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    P´ erez-Obiol, S

    A. P´ erez-Obiol, S. Masot-Llima, A. M. Romero,et al., Quantum entanglement patterns in the structure of atomic nuclei within the nuclear shell model, Eur. Phys. J. A59, 240 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    A. T. Kruppa, J. Kovacs, P. Salamon, and O. Legeza, Entanglement and correlation in two-nucleon systems, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.48, 025107 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Kovacs, A

    J. Kovacs, A. T. Kruppa, O. Legeza, and P. Salamon, Mode entanglement and isospin pairing in two-nucleon systems, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.52, 015105 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    P´ erez-Obiol, S

    A. P´ erez-Obiol, S. Masot-Llima, A. M. Romero, J. Men´ endez, A. Rios, A. Garc´ ıa-S´ aez, and B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, Entropy-driven entanglement forging, arXiv:2409.04510 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    R. M. Shinde and P. C. Srivastava, Study of entangle- ment in Ne, Mg, and Si isotopic chains, J. Subat. Part. Cosmology4, 100142 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Costa, A

    E. Costa, A. P´ erez-Obiol, J. Men´ endez, A. Rios, A. Garc´ ıa-S´ aez, and B. Juli´ a-D´ ıaz, A quantum annealing protocol to solve the nuclear shell model, SciPost Phys. 19, 062 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    C. W. Johnson, O. C. Gorton, A weak entanglement approximation for nuclear structure: a progress report, J. Subat. Part. Cosmology3, 100061 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    O. C. Gorton, C. W. Johnson, Weak entanglement ap- proximation for nuclear structure, Phys. Rev. C110, 034305 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum in- formation theory, Rev

    V. Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum in- formation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 197 (2002)

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    Schumacher and M

    B. Schumacher and M. D. Westmoreland, Relative entropy in quantum information theory, arXiv:quant- ph/0004045 (2000)

    work page arXiv 2000

  65. [65]

    Sagawa, Second Law-Like Inequalities with Quantum Relative Entropy: An Introduction, arXiv:1202.0983 [quant-ph](2012)

    T. Sagawa, Second Law-Like Inequalities with Quantum Relative Entropy: An Introduction, arXiv:1202.0983 [quant-ph](2012)

    work page arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Floerchinger and T

    S. Floerchinger and T. Haas, Thermodynamics from rel- ative entropy, Phys. Rev. E102, 052117 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    A. P. Majtey, P. W. Lamberti, and D. P. Prato, Jensen- Shannon divergence as a measure of distinguishabil- ity between mixed quantum states, Phys. Rev. A72, 052310 (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Grosse, P

    I. Grosse, P. Bernaola-Galv´ an, P. Carpena, R. Rom´ an- Rold´ an, J. Oliver, and H. E. Stanley, Analysis of sym- bolic sequences using the Jensen-Shannon divergence, Phys. Rev. E65, 041905 (2002)

    work page 2002

  69. [69]

    P. W. Lamberti, A. P. Majtey, A. Borr´ as, M. Casas, and A. Plastino, Metric character of the quantum Jensen- Shannon divergence, Phys. Rev. A77, 052311 (2008)

    work page 2008

  70. [70]

    Bri¨ et and P

    J. Bri¨ et and P. Harremo¨ es, Properties of classical and quantum Jensen-Shannon divergence, Phys. Rev. A79, 052311 (2009)

    work page 2009

  71. [71]

    Caurier, G

    E. Caurier, G. Martinez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, A. P. Zuker, The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure, Rev. of Mod. Phys.77, 427-488 (2005). 17

    work page 2005

  72. [72]

    B. A. Brown, The Nuclear Shell Model towards the Drip Lines, Physics4, 525 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Otsuka, A

    T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin, T. Suzuki, and Y. Ut- suno, Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 015002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Sorlin, M.-G

    O. Sorlin, M.-G. Porquet, Nuclear magic numbers: New features far from stability, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.61, 602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    E. K. Warburton, J. A. Becker, and B. A. Brown, Mass systematics forA= 29-44 nuclei: The deformedA∼32 region, Phys. Rev. C41, 1147 (1990)

    work page 1990

  76. [76]

    Poves, J

    A. Poves, J. Retamosa, Theoretical study of the very neutron-rich nuclei aroundN= 20, Nucl. Phys. A571, 221 (1994)

    work page 1994

  77. [77]

    Kaneko, Y

    K. Kaneko, Y. Sun, T. Mizusaki, and M. Hasegawa, Shell-model study for neutron-rich sd-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C83, 014320 (2011)

    work page 2011

  78. [78]

    Utsuno, T

    Y. Utsuno, T. Otsuka, T. Mizusaki, and M. Honma, Varying shell gap and deformation inN∼20 unstable nuclei studied by the Monte Carlo shell model, Phys. Rev. C60, 054315 (1999)

    work page 1999

  79. [79]

    Nowacki and A

    F. Nowacki and A. Poves, New effective interaction for 0ℏωshell-model calculations in thesd−pfvalence space, Phys. Rev. C79, 014310 (2009)

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    Utsuno, T

    Y. Utsuno, T. Otsuka, B. A. Brown, M. Honma, T. Mizusaki, and N. Shimizu, Shape transitions in exotic Si and S isotopes and tensor-force-driven Jahn-Teller effect, Phys. Rev. C86, 051301(R) (2012)

    work page 2012

Showing first 80 references.