pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.17328 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-24 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · cond-mat.other· cond-mat.stat-mech

Quantum field theory approach for multistage chemical kinetics in liquids

Roman V. Li , Oleg A. Igoshin , Evgeny B. Krissinel , Pavel A. Frantsuzov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph cond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum field theorymultistage kineticsreaction-diffusionencounter theorychemical kineticsmicroscopic correlationspartial differential equationsliquid phase reactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum field theory maps multistage reactions in liquids onto a set of coupled PDEs that capture microscopic correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses quantum field theory to derive kinetic equations for general multistage reactive systems in liquids, producing what the authors call complete modified encounter theory or CMET. Standard mass-action laws miss the particle correlations that arise in bimolecular encounters, and earlier methods handled only special cases; CMET supplies a unified description as coupled partial differential equations that can be integrated numerically. The resulting equations reproduce the predictions of many existing theories inside their limited domains of validity. A reader would care because the approach supplies a practical computational tool for modeling reaction-diffusion processes in chemistry and biology where correlations cannot be ignored.

Core claim

Mapping the multistage reaction-diffusion problem onto quantum field theory yields the complete modified encounter theory (CMET), expressed as a closed set of coupled partial differential equations for the time-dependent densities. These equations incorporate the microscopic correlations generated by bimolecular encounters without additional uncontrolled approximations and can be solved numerically for arbitrary multistage networks, recovering the results of prior specific theories within their respective ranges of applicability.

What carries the argument

Complete modified encounter theory (CMET), the set of coupled partial differential equations obtained by the quantum field theory mapping to classical multistage reaction-diffusion dynamics.

If this is right

  • CMET supplies numerically integrable equations for the full time evolution of concentrations in any multistage reaction network.
  • The same equations reduce exactly to the predictions of earlier encounter theories when those theories' assumptions are restored.
  • Microscopic correlations are retained for every bimolecular step, improving accuracy over mass-action kinetics in dense or correlated liquids.
  • The PDE formulation permits direct numerical study of reaction-diffusion processes across physical, chemical, and biological systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Enzyme-cascade or signaling-network models could adopt CMET to obtain concentration trajectories without ad-hoc rate corrections.
  • The numerical tractability of the coupled PDEs makes it feasible to scan wide parameter ranges for multistage systems that were previously intractable.
  • Extension to spatially inhomogeneous or crowded environments would test whether the same QFT mapping continues to suffice.
  • Direct experimental tests in well-characterized liquid reactions could reveal whether additional correlation terms become necessary at high densities.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum field theory mapping to classical multistage reaction-diffusion systems captures every relevant microscopic correlation without extra uncontrolled approximations that appear only in the multistage setting.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of CMET numerical solutions against molecular-dynamics trajectories for a concrete three-stage reaction sequence in a dense liquid, checking whether the predicted concentration time courses deviate systematically once higher-order correlations become measurable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.17328 by Evgeny B. Krissinel, Oleg A. Igoshin, Pavel A. Frantsuzov, Roman V. Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Time dependence of the concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (top) Acceptor concentration dependence of the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time dependence of the reaction functions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Illustration of the IET action for the reaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The comparison of IET, MET, and CMET solutions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of processes contributing to pair correlation dynamics/interconversion in IET, M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reaction-diffusion processes play an important role in a variety of physical, chemical, and biological systems. Conventionally, the kinetics of these processes are described by the law of mass action. However, there are various cases where these equations are insufficient. A fundamental challenge lies in accurately accounting for the microscopic correlations that inevitably arise in bimolecular reactions. While approaches to describe microscopic correlations in many specific cases exist, no general theory for multistage reactions has been established. In this article, we apply the quantum field theory approach to derive kinetic equations for general multistage reactive systems termed CMET (complete modified encounter theory). CMET can be formulated as a set of coupled partial differential equations that can be easily integrated numerically, thereby serving as a versatile tool for investigating reaction-diffusion processes. Across multiple case studies, we demonstrated that CMET reproduces the kinetics predicted by many other theories within their respective scopes of applicability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper applies a quantum field theory formalism to derive kinetic equations for general multistage reaction-diffusion systems in liquids, introducing the Complete Modified Encounter Theory (CMET) as a set of coupled partial differential equations that can be integrated numerically. Case studies are presented to show that CMET reproduces the predictions of prior theories within their domains of applicability.

Significance. If the QFT-to-classical mapping is rigorously justified without uncontrolled approximations for multistage cases, the framework would provide a general, numerically tractable tool for incorporating microscopic pair correlations into complex chemical kinetics, extending beyond the law of mass action and unifying disparate specific models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that CMET reproduces kinetics from other theories is stated without any derivation outline, explicit reduction steps, error bounds, or verification checks, so the soundness of the QFT mapping for chained reactions cannot be assessed from the manuscript text.
  2. [QFT approach section] The QFT approach section: the translation from creation/annihilation operators and interaction terms to classical multistage PDEs must be shown to preserve all time-delayed and state-dependent correlations of intermediates; without a controlled demonstration that no extra closures are introduced, the generality claim for arbitrary multistage sequences remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [CMET formulation] Notation for the coupled PDEs should be introduced with explicit definitions of all operators and boundary conditions to aid numerical implementation.
  2. [Case studies] The case-study comparisons would benefit from tabulated quantitative metrics (e.g., relative errors or overlap integrals) rather than qualitative statements of agreement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have made revisions to improve the clarity and rigor of the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that CMET reproduces kinetics from other theories is stated without any derivation outline, explicit reduction steps, error bounds, or verification checks, so the soundness of the QFT mapping for chained reactions cannot be assessed from the manuscript text.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract could more explicitly outline the key steps in the derivation. In the revised manuscript, we have updated the abstract to briefly describe the QFT-based derivation of CMET and note that it reduces to established theories in appropriate limits, as verified through the case studies presented in the main text. While explicit error bounds are not provided (as the mapping is formally exact within the QFT framework), the numerical verifications demonstrate the accuracy within the domains of applicability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [QFT approach section] The QFT approach section: the translation from creation/annihilation operators and interaction terms to classical multistage PDEs must be shown to preserve all time-delayed and state-dependent correlations of intermediates; without a controlled demonstration that no extra closures are introduced, the generality claim for arbitrary multistage sequences remains unverified.

    Authors: The derivation in the QFT approach section starts from the exact operator equations for the creation and annihilation operators and proceeds to the integro-differential equations for the pair correlation functions without introducing additional closures beyond those inherent to the encounter theory approximation. To address this concern, we have added a detailed appendix in the revised version that walks through the mapping for a general multistage reaction, explicitly showing how time-delayed correlations are captured via the memory kernels and how state-dependent effects are included through the reaction rates for each intermediate. This demonstrates that no extraneous approximations are made for arbitrary sequences. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

QFT mapping to CMET is self-contained derivation without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe applying a quantum field theory approach to derive coupled PDEs for multistage reaction-diffusion systems (CMET), with verification that it reproduces kinetics from other theories in their scopes. No equations, definitions, or citations in the visible text exhibit self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that force the central result by construction. The derivation chain starts from standard QFT operators and interaction terms mapped to classical kinetics, remaining independent of the target multistage outputs. This is the common case of an honest non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of quantum field theory techniques to classical multistage reaction-diffusion without introducing new fitted parameters or entities beyond standard encounter theory extensions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory methods can be mapped to derive exact kinetic equations for classical multistage bimolecular reactions in liquids
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for obtaining CMET from QFT.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1043 out tokens · 20726 ms · 2026-05-16T11:43:15.866134+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    + ˆV(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2) ˆG(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2, t, ⃗ r′ 1, ⃗ r′ 2, t ′) ˆV(⃗ r′ 1, ⃗ r′

    work page

  2. [2]

    (5.6) where ˆG is the pair Green’s function (PGF) which obeys the following equation ∂ ∂t ˆG(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2, t, ⃗ r′ 1, ⃗ r′ 2, t ′) = ( ˆL + ˆQ + ˆV(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2) ) ˆG(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2, t, ⃗ r′ 1, ⃗ r′ 2, t ′) (5.7) 13 with the initial condition ˆG(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2, t, ⃗ r′ 1, ⃗ r′ 2, t ) = ˆIδ(⃗ r1 − ⃗ r′ 1)δ(⃗ r2 − ⃗ r′ 2) where ˆQ = ˆQ ⊗ ˆI + ˆI ⊗ ˆQ , and ˆLik,lm = δi...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ezective

    have shown that the kinetics of the A + B → C + B reaction can be correctly described only if all α -terms up to the order of α 5 are taken into consideration. For ex- ample, the diagram (6.1), included in R(3) i (⃗ r, t), has the }fth order in α . Therefore, we aim to modify the IET by including all diagrams in the series α n, where n ≤ 5. It is easy to ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    This modi}cation leaves Eqs.(7.3,7.5) unchanged, but non-zero initial conditions can be introduced: pik(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2, 0) = p0 ik(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2) (7.8) VIII

    However, with a minor modi}cation of the above- described diagrammatic technique, it is possible to gen- eralize the results for arbitrary initial pair correlations. This modi}cation leaves Eqs.(7.3,7.5) unchanged, but non-zero initial conditions can be introduced: pik(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2, 0) = p0 ik(⃗ r1, ⃗ r2) (7.8) VIII. SP A TIALL Y HOMOGENOUS CONCENTRA TIONS ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    coincides with the Eqs.(8.2-8.4) when ˆS(t) is de}ned as Sil(t) = ∑ jm Kij,lm Cm(t) (8.6) Substituting Eq.(8.4) into Eq.(8.1), we can obtain d dt ⃗C(t) = Tr2 ∫ ∞ 0 ˆW(r) ˆP (r, t ) d3r + ˆQ ⃗C(t) (8.7) The spherically-symmetric pair correlation function ˆp(r, t ) is subject to the upper and lower boundary condi- tions. The former follows directly from Eq....

    work page

  6. [6]

    Pseudo-}rst order limit C e A, C e C → 0 : RA(t) = KeC e B (KeC e B + C e D)2 (4π (DD + D)t)− 3/ 2 + KeC e D (KeC e B + C e D)2 (4π (DB + D)t)− 3/ 2 (10.17) where D = C e DDA + C e BDC C e B + C e D

    work page

  7. [7]

    Equal dizusion constants DA = DC, D B = DD: RA(t) = 2(Ke − 1)2KeC e AC e B (Ke(C e A + C e B) + C e C + C e D)3 (8π Dt)− 3/ 2 + Ke(C e B + C e D) (Ke(C e A + C e B) + C e C + C e D)2 (4π (DA + D)t)− 3/ 2 + Ke(C e A + C e C) (Ke(C e A + C e B) + C e C + C e D)2 (4π (DB + D)t)− 3/ 2 (10.18) where D = DA(KeC e A + C e C) + DB(KeC e B + C e D) Ke(C e A + C e ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    4, with the parameters shown in Table I

    Equal dizusion constants DA = DB, D C = DD: 22 RA(t) = 2KeC e AC e B (Ke(C e A + C e B) + C e C + C e D)(C e A + C e B) (8πD At)− 3/ 2 + 2KeC e CC e D (Ke(C e A + C e B) + C e C + C e D)(C e C + C e D) (8πD Ct)− 3/ 2 + KeC e AC e B(Ke((C e A)2 + (C e B)2) − (C e C)2 − (C e D)2) (Ke(C e A + C e B) + C e C + C e D)3(C e A + C e B)2(C e C + C e D)2 (8π Dt)− ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    No reactions of particles in a given pair FIG

    IET formulates the correlation dynamics of the given pair of reactants, taking into account their dizusion, force-chemical interactions, and intercon- version of pair correlations due to monomolecular reactions. No reactions of particles in a given pair FIG. 7. Illustration of the MET and the CMET action for the reaction A+B → C +D. (a) Schematic picture ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    However, even in dilute solutions, the probability of conversion of a given particle to a dizerent one due to bimolecular reaction in bulk can be compara- ble to the internal conversion and, therefore, needs to be taken into account. MET accounts for the contributions of these processes onto correlations, focusing only on the direct interconversion of the...

    work page

  11. [11]

    CMET accounts for the fact that, as a result of these bulk reactions, another molecule appeared or disappeared in the vicinity of the original one, and thus another correlation interconversion should be accounted for. For the full schematics of the processes contributing to pair-correlation dynamics/interconversion in IET, MET, 26 10 -10 10 -8 10 -6 10 -4...

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    A. L. Harris, J. K. Brown, and C. B. Harris, The nature of simple photodissociation reactions in liquids on ultra- fast time scales, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 39, 341–366 (1988)

    work page 1988

  13. [13]

    Seeger, Semiconductor physics: An Introduction (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, 2004)

    K. Seeger, Semiconductor physics: An Introduction (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, 2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    K. S. Y. Molin, R. Sagdeev, and A. Buchachenko, Spin Polarization and Magnetic Ezects in Radical Reactions (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1984)

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    S. Soh, M. Byrska, K. Kandere-Grzybowska, and B. A. Grzybowski, Reaction-dizusion systems in intracellular molecular transport and control, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49, 4170–4198 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    von Smoluchowski, Versucheiner mathematischen theorie der koagulations kinetic kolloider lousungen., Z

    M. von Smoluchowski, Versucheiner mathematischen theorie der koagulations kinetic kolloider lousungen., Z. Phys. Chem. 92, 129 (1917)

    work page 1917

  17. [17]

    R. A. Fisher, The wave of advance of advantageous genes, Ann. Eug. 7, 355 (1937)

    work page 1937

  18. [18]

    Kolmogorov, I

    A. Kolmogorov, I. Petrovskii, and N. Piskunov, A study of the dizusion equation with increase in the amount of substance, and its application to a biological problem, Bull. Moscow Univ., Math. Mech. 1, 1–25 (1937)

    work page 1937

  19. [19]

    Y. B. Zeldovich and D. A. Frank-Kamenetsky, The wave of advance of advantageous genes, Acta Physicochim. 9, 341 (1938)

    work page 1938

  20. [20]

    Debye, Reaction rates in ionic solutions, Trans

    P. Debye, Reaction rates in ionic solutions, Trans. Elec- trochem. Soc. 82, 265—272 (1942). 27

    work page 1942

  21. [21]

    A. M. Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Phi- los. Trans. R. Soc. B 237, 37 (1952)

    work page 1952

  22. [22]

    A. M. Zhabotinsky, Concentrational Autooscillations [in Russian] (Science, Moscow, 1974)

    work page 1974

  23. [23]

    Ehrenfest and T

    P. Ehrenfest and T. Ehrenfest, The Conceptual Foun- dations of the Statistical Approach in Mechanics , Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Murphy, M

    P. Murphy, M. Perepelitsa, I. Timofeyev, M. Lieber- Kotz, B. Islas, and O. A. Igoshin, Breakdown of boltzmann-type models for the alignment of self- propelled rods, Mathematical Biosciences 376, 109266 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    A. I. Burshtein, Adv. Chem. Phys. 129, 105 (2004)

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    Ma, C.-C

    J. Ma, C.-C. Wang, Z.-X. Zhao, P. Wang, J.-J. Li, and F.-X. Wang, Adsorptive capture of perrhenate (reo4-) from simulated wastewater by cationic 2d-mof buc-17, Polyhedron 202, 115218 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Z. Zeng, J. Lyu, P. Bai, and X. Guo, Adsorptive separation of fructose and glucose by metal-organic frameworks: Equilibrium, kinetic, thermodynamic, and adsorption mechanism studies, Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research 57, 9200 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    M. T. Klann, A. Lapin, and M. Reuss, Agent-based sim- ulation of reactions in the crowded and structured intra- cellular environment: In~uence of mobility and location of the reactants, BMC Systems Biology 5, 71 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    T. K. Lee, K. Meng, H. Shi, and K. C. Huang, Single- molecule imaging reveals modulation of cell wall syn- thesis dynamics in live bacterial cells, Nature Commu- nications 7, 13170 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    L. H. Manger, M. B. Rowley, Y. Fu, A. K. Foote, M. T. Rea, S. L. Wood, S. Jin, J. C. Wright, and R. H. Gold- smith, Global analysis of perovskite photophysics re- veals importance of geminate pathways, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, 1062 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Augulis, M

    R. Augulis, M. Franckevičius, V. Abramavičius, D. Abramavičius, S. M. Z. ang Michael Grätzel, and V. Gulbinas, Adv. Energy Mater 1, 1700405 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Hempel, M

    H. Hempel, M. Stolterfoht, O. Karalis, and T. Unold, The potential of geminate pairs in lead halide perovskite revealed via time-resolved photoluminescence (2024), arXiv:2409.06382 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Bartesaghi, I

    D. Bartesaghi, I. del Carmen Pérez, J. Kniepert, S. Roland, M. Turbiez, D. Neher, and L. J. A. Koster, Nat. Commun. 6, 7083 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Balescu, Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975)

    R. Balescu, Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975)

    work page 1975

  35. [35]

    Forster, Properties of the kinetic memory function in classical ~uids, Physical Review A 9, 943 (1974)

    D. Forster, Properties of the kinetic memory function in classical ~uids, Physical Review A 9, 943 (1974)

    work page 1974

  36. [36]

    Lu and S

    X. Lu and S. Shi, Spectral bbgky: a scalable scheme for nonlinear boltzmann and correlation kinetics (2025), arXiv:2507.14243 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    M. Doi, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1465 (1976)

    work page 1976

  38. [38]

    M. Doi, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1479 (1976)

    work page 1976

  39. [39]

    Y. B. Zheldovich and A. A. Ovchinnikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 47, 829 (1978)

    work page 1978

  40. [40]

    A. S. Mikhailov and V. V. Yashin, J. Stat. Phys. 38, 347 (1985)

    work page 1985

  41. [42]

    B. P. Lee and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Phys. 80, 971 (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [43]

    M. Doi, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26, 5313 (1993)

    work page 1993

  43. [44]

    U. C. Täuber, M. Howard, and B. P. Vollmayr-Lee, Ap- plications of }eld-theoretic renormalization group meth- ods to reaction–dizusion problems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 38, R79 (2005)

    work page 2005

  44. [45]

    Hnatich, J

    M. Hnatich, J. Honkonen, and T. Lučivjanský, Theor. Math. Phys. 169, 1481–1488 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [46]

    Hnatich, J

    M. Hnatich, J. Honkonen, and T. T. Lučivjanský, Theor. Math. Phys. 169, 1489–1498 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [47]

    Hirono and R

    Y. Hirono and R. Hanai, J. Stat. Phys. 190, 86 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [48]

    D. C. Mattis and M. L. Glasser, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 979 (1998)

    work page 1998

  48. [49]

    P. A. Frantsuzov, O. A. Igoshin, and E. B. Krissinel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 317, 481 (2000)

    work page 2000

  49. [50]

    Collins and G

    F. Collins and G. Kimball, Dizusion-controlled reaction rates, J. Colloid. Sci. 4, 425 (1949)

    work page 1949

  50. [51]

    T. R. Waite, Phys. Rev. 107, 463 (1957)

    work page 1957

  51. [52]

    Wilemski and M

    G. Wilemski and M. Fixman, General theory of dizusion-controlled reactions, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 4009– 4019 (1973)

    work page 1973

  52. [53]

    S. F. Kilin, M. S. Mikhelashvili, and I. M. Rozman, Transfer of electronic excitation energy in liquid solu- tions, Opt. Spectrosc. 16, 576 (1964)

    work page 1964

  53. [54]

    N. N. Tunitsky and H. S. Bagdasaryan, Opt. Spectrosc. 15, 303 (1963)

    work page 1963

  54. [55]

    Rice, Dizusion-limited Reactions (Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, v.25, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985)

    S. Rice, Dizusion-limited Reactions (Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, v.25, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985)

    work page 1985

  55. [56]

    Allinger and A

    K. Allinger and A. Blumen, On the direct energy trans- fer to moving acceptors, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 4608–4619 (1980)

    work page 1980

  56. [57]

    Szabo, Theory of dizusion-in~uenced ~uorescence quenching, J

    A. Szabo, Theory of dizusion-in~uenced ~uorescence quenching, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 6929–6939 (1989)

    work page 1989

  57. [58]

    B. Y. Balagurov and V. G. Vaks, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 1939 (1973)

    work page 1939

  58. [59]

    A. A. Ovchinnikov and Y. B. Zheldovich, Chem. Phys. 28, 215 (1978)

    work page 1978

  59. [60]

    Procaccia, Y

    I. Procaccia, Y. Shimoni, and R. D. Levine, Rotational relaxation: An analytic solution of the master equa- tion with applications to hcl, The Journal of Chemical Physics 63, 3181–3182 (1975)

    work page 1975

  60. [61]

    Toussant and F

    D. Toussant and F. Wilczek, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 2642 (1983)

    work page 1983

  61. [62]

    Paster, D

    A. Paster, D. Bolster, and D. A. Benson, Connecting the dots: Semi-analytical and random walk numerical solu- tions of the dizusion–reaction equation with stochas- tic initial conditions, Journal of Computational Physics 263, 91 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [63]

    Monson and R

    E. Monson and R. Kopelman, Phys. Rev. E 69, 021103 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [64]

    A. I. Burshtein, Chem. Phys. Let. 194, 247 (1992)

    work page 1992

  64. [65]

    R. C. Dorfman and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 7410 (1992)

    work page 1992

  65. [66]

    J. G. J. Kirkwood, Chem. Phys. 3, 300 (1935)

    work page 1935

  66. [67]

    Monchick, J

    L. Monchick, J. L. Magee, and A. H. Samuel, J. Chem. Phys. 26, 935 (1957)

    work page 1957

  67. [68]

    Kapral, Adv

    R. Kapral, Adv. Chem. Phys. 48, 71 (1981)

    work page 1981

  68. [69]

    Lee and M

    S. Lee and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 1883 (1987)

    work page 1987

  69. [70]

    Agmon and A

    N. Agmon and A. Szabo, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5270 (1990)

    work page 1990

  70. [71]

    Molski and J

    A. Molski and J. Kaizer, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1391 (1992)

    work page 1992

  71. [72]

    Kotomin and V

    E. Kotomin and V. Kuzovkov, Modern aspects of dizusion-controlled reactions. Cooperative phenom- mena in bimolecular processes (Comprehensive Chemi- cal Kinetics, v.34, , Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [73]

    Sung and S

    J. Sung and S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 796 (1999)

    work page 1999

  73. [74]

    Sung and S

    J. Sung and S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 804 (1999)

    work page 1999

  74. [75]

    Sung and S

    J. Sung and S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10159 (1999). 28

    work page 1999

  75. [76]

    Sung and S

    J. Sung and S. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2128 (2000)

    work page 2000

  76. [77]

    A. B. Doktorov, Recent Res. Devel. Chem. Physics 6, 135–192 (2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [78]

    I. M. Lifshitz, S. A. Gredescool, and L. A. Pastur, The introduction to the theory of disordered systems (Willey & Sons, New York, 1988)

    work page 1988

  78. [79]

    R. J. Elliot, J. A. Krumhansl, and P. L. Leath, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 465 (1974)

    work page 1974

  79. [80]

    J. M. Ziman, Models of disorder (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1979)

    work page 1979

  80. [81]

    Bixon and R

    M. Bixon and R. Zwanzig, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 2354 (1981)

    work page 1981

Showing first 80 references.