arxiv: 2601.23065 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-30 · 💻 cs.GR · cs.CV

Recognition: no theorem link

EAG-PT: Emission-Aware Gaussians and Path Tracing for Diffuse Indoor Scene Reconstruction and Editing

Xijie Yang , Mulin Yu , Changjian Jiang , Kerui Ren , Tao Lu , Jiangmiao Pang , Dahua Lin , Bo Dai

show 1 more author

Linning Xu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GR cs.CV

keywords indoor scene reconstruction2D Gaussianspath tracingglobal illuminationscene editingradiance fieldsinverse renderingdiffuse lighting

0 comments

The pith

EAG-PT reconstructs indoor scenes with emission-aware 2D Gaussians to support physically consistent lighting edits via path tracing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that representing indoor scenes with 2D Gaussians, while separating emissive from non-emissive parts, yields a representation that supports accurate light transport simulation for editing. A reader would care because this sidesteps the baked-in lighting of radiance fields and the strict geometry demands of mesh-based inverse rendering, opening the door to believable changes in lights and materials inside captured rooms. The method optimizes the Gaussians with single-bounce paths only and then renders final images with full multi-bounce path tracing. Experiments on both synthetic and real data are presented to show the resulting edits look more natural and avoid mesh artifacts.

Core claim

The central claim is that a unified 2D Gaussian representation can serve as a transport-friendly geometric proxy for diffuse indoor scenes once emissive and non-emissive components are modeled separately. Reconstruction therefore uses efficient single-bounce optimization, while final rendering applies high-quality multi-bounce path tracing; the resulting edited images exhibit more natural global illumination than radiance-field baselines and retain finer detail than mesh-based inverse path tracing.

What carries the argument

Emission-aware 2D Gaussians used as a geometric proxy that separates emissive and non-emissive components to enable single-bounce reconstruction followed by multi-bounce path tracing.

If this is right

Changes to lights or surfaces produce believable global illumination effects in the edited renderings.
Geometric detail remains higher than in mesh-based inverse rendering methods.
Reconstruction succeeds on real indoor captures without requiring perfect mesh geometry.
The same representation supports downstream uses such as interior design visualization and XR content creation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The separation of emission could be generalized to handle view-dependent effects if the Gaussian representation is extended.
Combining the approach with dynamic object insertion would allow testing of real-time editing pipelines.
Quantitative error metrics on shadow boundaries in edited scenes would provide a direct test of the transport accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

That 2D Gaussians supply enough geometric information for accurate light transport calculations without an explicit mesh.

What would settle it

Render an edited scene with EAG-PT and compare it side-by-side with a ground-truth multi-bounce path-traced image computed from the original high-fidelity mesh; visible errors in shadows, inter-reflections, or color bleeding would falsify the consistency claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.23065 by Bo Dai, Changjian Jiang, Dahua Lin, Jiangmiao Pang, Kerui Ren, Linning Xu, Mulin Yu, Tao Lu, Xijie Yang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Renders of F-CLASSROOM before and after editing. Radiant Scene: Most radiance field reconstruction works [23, 34, 35] regard the whole scene as radiant, which cannot produce light changes and shadow effects after scene editing. Radiant Reflection: Some reflection modeling works [27, 70] add a single bounce to produce more realistic results, while still suffering from the incorrect radiance after scene e… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Pipeline of Emission-Aware Gaussians and Path Tracing. Given multi-view linear captures of an indoor scene with corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Relighting results with an inserted illuminated ball on synthetic scenes. Insets show FLIP error maps w.r.t. the relighting ground [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Relighting results on the captured real scene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Path-traced results for various scene-editing operations on Eyeful Tower scenes. After editing, our EAG-PT yields plausible ren [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Path-traced novel views on real scenes compared with mesh-based FIPT. Zoomed regions highlight that our 2D Gaussians better [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Ablation study on F-CLASSROOM. The comparisons show that accurate normals, proper emission masks, sufficient bounce limit and samples per pixel, and a denoiser are all necessary to avoid artifacts and to achieve our final high-quality path-traced result [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Albedo recovery on B-KITCHEN. Low samples per pixel make it difficult to accurately recover the ceiling albedo because of high sampling noise. 3 4 5 6 7 8 22 24 26 28 Albedo PSNR Optimization Duration (log2 ) nspp 16 nspp 64 nspp 256 nspp 1024 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Albedo PSNR during material recovery on BKITCHEN: for a fixed optimization budget, higher nspp yields higher PSNR, showing that reducing sampling noise is more effective than increasing iterations at low nspp. creasing either the bounce limit or nspp further improves image quality but also increases rendering time, as reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Exceptions of emission masks. (a) Reflection is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Ray-Gaussian intersection count visualization on two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent radiance-field-based reconstruction methods, such as NeRF and 3DGS, achieve high visual fidelity for indoor scenes, but often break down under scene editing due to baked illumination and the lack of explicit light transport. In contrast, inverse path tracing methods based on mesh representations enforce correct light transport but require highly accurate geometry, making them difficult to apply robustly to real indoor scenes. We present Emission-Aware Gaussians and Path Tracing (EAG-PT), a method for physically based reconstruction and rendering of indoor scenes using a unified 2D Gaussian representation, targeting editable diffuse global illumination. Our approach consists of three key ideas: (1) representing indoor scenes with 2D Gaussians as a transport-friendly geometric proxy that avoids explicit mesh reconstruction; (2) explicitly separating emissive and non-emissive components during reconstruction to support editing; and (3) decoupling reconstruction from final rendering by using efficient single-bounce optimization and high-quality multi-bounce path tracing, respectively. Experiments on synthetic and real indoor scenes show that EAG-PT produces more natural and physically consistent edited renderings than radiance-field reconstructions, while preserving finer geometric detail and avoiding mesh-induced artifacts compared with mesh-based inverse path tracing. These results highlight the potential of our approach for applications such as interior design, XR content creation, and embodied AI.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

EAG-PT uses 2D Gaussians with explicit emission separation and decoupled single-bounce optimization plus multi-bounce path tracing to support editing of diffuse indoor scenes, but the abstract supplies no numbers to back the consistency claims.

read the letter

The main advance is a 2D Gaussian representation that keeps emissive and non-emissive components separate during single-bounce fitting, then hands the result to unbiased path tracing for final multi-bounce renderings. This sidesteps the baked lighting that ruins editing in standard 3DGS while avoiding the mesh accuracy demands that make inverse path tracing brittle on real rooms. The decoupling of reconstruction from rendering is a clean practical move and addresses a real pain point for indoor applications. Experiments on synthetic and real scenes are said to yield more natural edited images with preserved detail and no mesh artifacts, which aligns with the stated goals for design tools and embodied AI. The approach looks like a sensible hybrid that could be useful once the details are filled in. The clearest weakness is the lack of any quantitative metrics, error tables, or ablation results in the abstract. Without those, it is difficult to know whether the edited renderings are actually more physically consistent or simply look plausible in selected views. The stress-test worry about ray-Gaussian intersections supplying accurate hit points and normals for multi-bounce transport is worth checking in the full text, since indoor geometry is full of concavities where small proxy errors would compound. If the paper shows solid validation on those points, the method holds up; otherwise the central claim stays unproven. This work is aimed at graphics researchers who build reconstruction pipelines for editing rather than pure novel-view synthesis. A reader already familiar with 3DGS and inverse rendering would get the most out of it. I would bring it to a reading group for the representation idea alone. It deserves peer review because the problem is well-posed and the proposed separation step is a genuine addition, even if revisions will need stronger evidence.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces EAG-PT for diffuse indoor scene reconstruction and editing. It represents scenes with Emission-Aware 2D Gaussians as a transport-friendly proxy, explicitly separates emissive and non-emissive components during single-bounce optimization, and decouples this from high-quality multi-bounce path tracing at render time. Experiments on synthetic and real scenes are claimed to yield more natural, physically consistent edited renderings than radiance-field methods while preserving detail and avoiding mesh artifacts.

Significance. If the core assumptions hold, the method offers a practical bridge between radiance-field approaches (high visual fidelity but baked lighting) and mesh-based inverse path tracing (correct transport but fragile geometry), enabling editable diffuse global illumination for applications like interior design and XR. The explicit emissive/non-emissive separation and single-bounce/multi-bounce decoupling are pragmatic strengths, though the absence of quantitative validation limits immediate impact.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that EAG-PT produces 'more natural and physically consistent edited renderings' than radiance-field reconstructions is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error analysis, or tabulated comparisons (e.g., no PSNR/SSIM, shadow error, or energy conservation measures for edited views).
[Method] Method description (implied in abstract points 1-3): the assumption that 2D Gaussians optimized under single-bounce supervision yield accurate hit points, normals, and visibility for unbiased multi-bounce path tracing is not derived or stress-tested; in concave indoor geometry this risks incorrect shadowing and indirect illumination even if single-bounce visuals appear plausible.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'transport-friendly geometric proxy' is introduced without a reference to prior work on Gaussian-ray intersection or normal estimation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recognition of EAG-PT's potential as a practical bridge between radiance-field and mesh-based methods. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the quantitative support and methodological justification.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that EAG-PT produces 'more natural and physically consistent edited renderings' than radiance-field reconstructions is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error analysis, or tabulated comparisons (e.g., no PSNR/SSIM, shadow error, or energy conservation measures for edited views).

Authors: We agree that the central claim in the abstract would be strengthened by quantitative metrics. The current manuscript presents qualitative comparisons demonstrating improved naturalness and physical consistency in edited renderings. In the revised version, we will add quantitative evaluations, such as PSNR and SSIM on edited views against ground-truth renders for synthetic scenes, and include a table with these metrics along with a brief analysis of energy conservation where applicable. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method description (implied in abstract points 1-3): the assumption that 2D Gaussians optimized under single-bounce supervision yield accurate hit points, normals, and visibility for unbiased multi-bounce path tracing is not derived or stress-tested; in concave indoor geometry this risks incorrect shadowing and indirect illumination even if single-bounce visuals appear plausible.

Authors: The single-bounce optimization is intended to recover a transport-friendly geometric proxy via 2D Gaussians, where matching the single-bounce images implicitly constrains the hit points, normals, and visibility. We will revise the method section to include a brief derivation explaining this assumption based on the optimization objective. Additionally, we will add stress tests or failure case analysis for concave indoor geometries to demonstrate the robustness of the proxy for multi-bounce path tracing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces EAG-PT by combining existing radiance-field and path-tracing techniques with a new emissive/non-emissive separation step and single-bounce optimization. No equations or claims reduce to fitted parameters by construction, no self-citations serve as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior author work. The central proxy claim (2D Gaussians as transport-friendly geometry) is presented as an assumption validated by experiments rather than derived tautologically from inputs. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks like NeRF/3DGS and mesh-based inverse PT.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that 2D Gaussians approximate geometry well enough for light transport and that emission separation during reconstruction transfers to editing; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly quantified in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption 2D Gaussians serve as a transport-friendly geometric proxy without requiring explicit mesh reconstruction.
Core of the first key idea in the abstract.

invented entities (1)

Emission-Aware Gaussians no independent evidence
purpose: To explicitly separate emissive and non-emissive components for editing support.
Introduced as the unified representation in the method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1308 out tokens · 27765 ms · 2026-05-16T09:28:14.294961+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Fairchild

Pontus Andersson, Jim Nilsson, Tomas Akenine-Möller, Magnus Oskarsson, Kalle Åström, and Mark D. Fairchild. Flip: A difference evaluator for alternating images.Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech., 3(2), 2020. 6

work page 2020
[2]

Inverse path tracing for joint material and lighting estimation

Dejan Azinovic, Tzu-Mao Li, Anton Kaplanyan, and Matthias Nießner. Inverse path tracing for joint material and lighting estimation. In2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 2442– 2451, 2019. 3

work page 2019
[3]

Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields

Jonathan T Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5470–5479, 2022. 3

work page 2022
[4]

Rendering resources, 2016

Benedikt Bitterli. Rendering resources, 2016. https://benedikt-bitterli.me/resources/. 6

work page 2016
[5]

Physically based shading at disney

Brent Burley. Physically based shading at disney. InSIG- GRAPH 2012 Course: Practical Physically Based Shading in Film and Game Production, 2012. Course Notes. 15

work page 2012
[6]

Raysplats: Ray tracing based gaussian splatting, 2025

Krzysztof Byrski, Marcin Mazur, Jacek Tabor, Tadeusz Dziarmaga, Marcin K ˛ adziołka, Dawid Baran, and Prze- mysław Spurek. Raysplats: Ray tracing based gaussian splatting, 2025. 3

work page 2025
[7]

Does 3d gaussian splatting need accurate volumetric rendering? InComputer Graphics Forum, page e70032

Adam Celarek, George Kopanas, George Drettakis, Michael Wimmer, and Bernhard Kerbl. Does 3d gaussian splatting need accurate volumetric rendering? InComputer Graphics Forum, page e70032. Wiley Online Library, 2025. 3

work page 2025
[8]

Alla Chaitanya, Anton S

Chakravarty R. Alla Chaitanya, Anton S. Kaplanyan, Christoph Schied, Marco Salvi, Aaron Lefohn, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and Timo Aila. Interactive reconstruction of monte carlo image sequences using a recurrent denoising autoencoder.ACM Trans. Graph., 36(4), 2017. 6

work page 2017
[9]

Don’t splat your gaussians: V olumetric ray-traced primitives for mod- eling and rendering scattering and emissive media.ACM Trans

Jorge Condor, Sebastien Speierer, Lukas Bode, Aljaz Bozic, Simon Green, Piotr Didyk, and Adrian Jarabo. Don’t splat your gaussians: V olumetric ray-traced primitives for mod- eling and rendering scattering and emissive media.ACM Trans. Graph., 44(1), 2025. 14

work page 2025
[10]

Inverse rendering using multi- bounce path tracing and reservoir sampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16360, 2024

Yuxin Dai, Qi Wang, Jingsen Zhu, Dianbing Xi, Yuchi Huo, Chen Qian, and Ying He. Inverse rendering using multi- bounce path tracing and reservoir sampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.16360, 2024. 3

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Torchoptix.https : / / github

eliphatfs. Torchoptix.https : / / github . com / eliphatfs/torchoptix, 2024. Accessed: 2024-09-

work page 2024
[12]

Deferred neural lighting: free-viewpoint re- lighting from unstructured photographs.ACM Trans

Duan Gao, Guojun Chen, Yue Dong, Pieter Peers, Kun Xu, and Xin Tong. Deferred neural lighting: free-viewpoint re- lighting from unstructured photographs.ACM Trans. Graph., 39(6), 2020. 15

work page 2020
[13]

Relightable 3d gaussians: Re- alistic point cloud relighting with brdf decomposition and ray tracing

Jian Gao, Chun Gu, Youtian Lin, Zhihao Li, Hao Zhu, Xun Cao, Li Zhang, and Yao Yao. Relightable 3d gaussians: Re- alistic point cloud relighting with brdf decomposition and ray tracing. InComputer Vision – ECCV 2024, pages 73–89, Cham, 2025. Springer Nature Switzerland. 3

work page 2024
[14]

Radiant foam: Real-time differen- tiable ray tracing, 2025

Shrisudhan Govindarajan, Daniel Rebain, Kwang Moo Yi, and Andrea Tagliasacchi. Radiant foam: Real-time differen- tiable ray tracing, 2025. 3

work page 2025
[15]

Irgs: Inter-reflective gaussian splatting with 2d gaus- sian ray tracing

Chun Gu, Xiaofei Wei, Zixuan Zeng, Yuxuan Yao, and Li Zhang. Irgs: Inter-reflective gaussian splatting with 2d gaus- sian ray tracing. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 10943–10952, 2025. 3, 4, 6

work page 2025
[16]

Shape, light, and material decomposition from images us- ing monte carlo rendering and denoising

Jon Hasselgren, Nikolai Hofmann, and Jacob Munkberg. Shape, light, and material decomposition from images us- ing monte carlo rendering and denoising. InProceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY , USA, 2022. Curran As- sociates Inc. 3

work page 2022
[17]

2d gaussian splatting for geometrically accu- rate radiance fields

Binbin Huang, Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Andreas Geiger, and Shenghua Gao. 2d gaussian splatting for geometrically accu- rate radiance fields. InACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2024. Association for Com- puting Machinery. 3, 4, 5

work page 2024
[18]

Lite- reality: Graphics-ready 3d scene reconstruction from rgb-d scans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02861, 2025

Zhening Huang, Xiaoyang Wu, Fangcheng Zhong, Heng- shuang Zhao, Matthias Nießner, and Joan Lasenby. Lite- reality: Graphics-ready 3d scene reconstruction from rgb-d scans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02861, 2025. 14

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Mitsuba 3 renderer, 2022

Wenzel Jakob, Sébastien Speierer, Nicolas Roussel, Merlin Nimier-David, Delio Vicini, Tizian Zeltner, Baptiste Nicolet, Miguel Crespo, Vincent Leroy, and Ziyi Zhang. Mitsuba 3 renderer, 2022. https://mitsuba-renderer.org. 3

work page 2022
[20]

Esr-nerf: Emissive source reconstruction using ldr multi- view images

Jinseo Jeong, Junseo Koo, Qimeng Zhang, and Gunhee Kim. Esr-nerf: Emissive source reconstruction using ldr multi- view images. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4598– 4609, 2024. 3

work page 2024
[21]

James T. Kajiya. The rendering equation.SIGGRAPH Com- put. Graph., 20(4):143–150, 1986. 3, 5

work page 1986
[22]

Poisson surface reconstruction

Michael Kazhdan, Matthew Bolitho, and Hugues Hoppe. Poisson surface reconstruction. InProceedings of the Fourth Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, page 61–70, Goslar, DEU, 2006. Eurographics Association. 3

work page 2006
[23]

3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.ACM Trans

Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkuehler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4), 2023. 1, 2, 3, 5

work page 2023
[24]

Segment any- thing

Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer White- head, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment any- thing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision, pages 4015–4026, 2023. 14

work page 2023
[25]

Intrin- sic image fusion for multi-view 3d material reconstruction

Peter Kocsis, Lukas Höllein, and Matthias Nießner. Intrin- sic image fusion for multi-view 3d material reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13157, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Olat gaussians for generic re- lightable appearance acquisition

Zhiyi Kuang, Yanchao Yang, Siyan Dong, Jiayue Ma, Hongbo Fu, and Youyi Zheng. Olat gaussians for generic re- lightable appearance acquisition. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. 15

work page 2024
[27]

Multi-view inverse rendering for large-scale real- world indoor scenes

Zhen Li, Lingli Wang, Mofang Cheng, Cihui Pan, and Ji- aqi Yang. Multi-view inverse rendering for large-scale real- world indoor scenes. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12499–12509, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 6 11

work page 2023
[28]

Iris: Inverse ren- dering of indoor scenes from low dynamic range images

Chih-Hao Lin, Jia-Bin Huang, Zhengqin Li, Zhao Dong, Christian Richardt, Tuotuo Li, Michael Zollhöfer, Johannes Kopf, Shenlong Wang, and Changil Kim. Iris: Inverse ren- dering of indoor scenes from low dynamic range images. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 465–474, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 14

work page 2025
[29]

Nerf as a non-distant environment emitter in physics- based inverse rendering

Jingwang Ling, Ruihan Yu, Feng Xu, Chun Du, and Shuang Zhao. Nerf as a non-distant environment emitter in physics- based inverse rendering. InACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Con- ference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. 3, 14, 16

work page 2024
[30]

Agisoft metashape (version 2.2) [software],

Agisoft LLC. Agisoft metashape (version 2.2) [software],

work page
[31]

Available athttps://www.agisoft.com/ downloads/installer/. 3

work page
[32]

Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering

Tao Lu, Mulin Yu, Linning Xu, Yuanbo Xiangli, Limin Wang, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20654–20664, 2024. 3, 5

work page 2024
[33]

Specnerf: Gaussian directional encoding for spec- ular reflections

Li Ma, Vasu Agrawal, Haithem Turki, Changil Kim, Chen Gao, Pedro Sander, Michael Zollhöfer, and Christian Richardt. Specnerf: Gaussian directional encoding for spec- ular reflections. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21188– 21198, 2024. 3

work page 2024
[34]

Lightlab: Controlling light sources in images with diffusion models

Nadav Magar, Amir Hertz, Eric Tabellion, Yael Pritch, Alex Rav-Acha, Ariel Shamir, and Yedid Hoshen. Lightlab: Controlling light sources in images with diffusion models. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Comput- ing Machinery. 14

work page 2025
[35]

Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T

Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthe- sis.Commun. ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021. 1, 2, 3

work page 2021
[36]

3d gaussian ray trac- ing: Fast tracing of particle scenes.ACM Trans

Nicolas Moenne-Loccoz, Ashkan Mirzaei, Or Perel, Ric- cardo de Lutio, Janick Martinez Esturo, Gavriel State, Sanja Fidler, Nicholas Sharp, and Zan Gojcic. 3d gaussian ray trac- ing: Fast tracing of particle scenes.ACM Trans. Graph., 43 (6), 2024. 2, 3, 5, 6, 14, 16

work page 2024
[37]

Real-time neural radiance caching for path trac- ing.ACM Trans

Thomas Müller, Fabrice Rousselle, Jan Novák, and Alexan- der Keller. Real-time neural radiance caching for path trac- ing.ACM Trans. Graph., 40(4), 2021. 5

work page 2021
[38]

Instant neural graphics primitives with a multires- olution hash encoding.ACM Trans

Thomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexan- der Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multires- olution hash encoding.ACM Trans. Graph., 41(4), 2022. 3

work page 2022
[39]

Material and Lighting Reconstruction for Com- plex Indoor Scenes with Texture-space Differentiable Ren- dering

Merlin Nimier-David, Zhao Dong, Wenzel Jakob, and Anton Kaplanyan. Material and Lighting Reconstruction for Com- plex Indoor Scenes with Texture-space Differentiable Ren- dering. InEurographics Symposium on Rendering - DL-only Track. The Eurographics Association, 2021. 3

work page 2021
[40]

Parker, James Bigler, Andreas Dietrich, Heiko Friedrich, Jared Hoberock, David Luebke, David McAllis- ter, Morgan McGuire, Keith Morley, Austin Robison, and Martin Stich

Steven G. Parker, James Bigler, Andreas Dietrich, Heiko Friedrich, Jared Hoberock, David Luebke, David McAllis- ter, Morgan McGuire, Keith Morley, Austin Robison, and Martin Stich. Optix: a general purpose ray tracing engine. ACM Trans. Graph., 29(4), 2010. 6

work page 2010
[41]

Interactive object insertion with differentiable ren- dering

Weikun Peng, Sota Taira, Chris Careaga, and Ya ˘gız Ak- soy. Interactive object insertion with differentiable ren- dering. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Posters, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Com- puting Machinery. 14

work page 2025
[42]

Editable physically-based reflections in raytraced gaussian radiance fields

Yohan Poirier-Ginter, Jeffrey Hu, Jean-François Lalonde, and George Drettakis. Editable physically-based reflections in raytraced gaussian radiance fields. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2025 - 18th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Asia, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 6, 14, 15

work page 2025
[43]

Octree-gs: Towards consistent real-time rendering with lod-structured 3d gaussians.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17898, 2024

Kerui Ren, Lihan Jiang, Tao Lu, Mulin Yu, Linning Xu, Zhangkai Ni, and Bo Dai. Octree-gs: Towards consistent real-time rendering with lod-structured 3d gaussians.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17898, 2024. 3

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Mv-colight: Efficient object compositing with consistent lighting and shadow generation

Kerui Ren, Jiayang Bai, Linning Xu, Lihan Jiang, Jiangmiao Pang, Mulin Yu, and Bo Dai. Mv-colight: Efficient object compositing with consistent lighting and shadow generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21483, 2025. 14

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Grounded sam: Assembling open-world models for diverse visual tasks,

Tianhe Ren, Shilong Liu, Ailing Zeng, Jing Lin, Kun- chang Li, He Cao, Jiayu Chen, Xinyu Huang, Yukang Chen, Feng Yan, Zhaoyang Zeng, Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Jie Yang, Hongyang Li, Qing Jiang, and Lei Zhang. Grounded sam: Assembling open-world models for diverse visual tasks,

work page
[46]

Schönberger, Enliang Zheng, Jan-Michael Frahm, and Marc Pollefeys

Johannes L. Schönberger, Enliang Zheng, Jan-Michael Frahm, and Marc Pollefeys. Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo. InComputer Vision – ECCV 2016, pages 501–518, Cham, 2016. Springer International Publishing. 3

work page 2016
[47]

Schönberger and Jan-Michael Frahm

Johannes L. Schönberger and Jan-Michael Frahm. Structure- from-motion revisited. In2016 IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4104– 4113, 2016. 3

work page 2016
[48]

The design and evolution of the uberbake light baking system.ACM Trans

Dario Seyb, Peter-Pike Sloan, Ari Silvennoinen, Michał Iwanicki, and Wojciech Jarosz. The design and evolution of the uberbake light baking system.ACM Trans. Graph., 39 (4), 2020. 6

work page 2020
[49]

High dynamic range electro-optical transfer func- tion of mastering reference displays

SMPTE. High dynamic range electro-optical transfer func- tion of mastering reference displays. SMPTE Standard ST 2084:2014, Society of Motion Picture and Television Engi- neers, 2014. 5

work page 2084
[50]

The Replica Dataset: A Digital Replica of Indoor Spaces

Julian Straub, Thomas Whelan, Lingni Ma, Yufan Chen, Erik Wijmans, Simon Green, Jakob J Engel, Raul Mur-Artal, Carl Ren, Shobhit Verma, et al. The replica dataset: A digital replica of indoor spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05797,

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906
[51]

Sam 3d: 3dfy anything in images, 2025

SAM 3D Team, Xingyu Chen, Fu-Jen Chu, Pierre Gleize, Kevin J Liang, Alexander Sax, Hao Tang, Weiyao Wang, Michelle Guo, Thibaut Hardin, Xiang Li, Aohan Lin, Jiawei Liu, Ziqi Ma, Anushka Sagar, Bowen Song, Xiaodong Wang, Jianing Yang, Bowen Zhang, Piotr Dollár, Georgia Gkioxari, Matt Feiszli, and Jitendra Malik. Sam 3d: 3dfy anything in images, 2025. 16

work page 2025
[52]

Meshsplats: Mesh- 12 based rendering with gaussian splatting initialization, 2025

Rafał Tobiasz, Grzegorz Wilczy ´nski, Marcin Mazur, Sła- womir Tadeja, and Przemysław Spurek. Meshsplats: Mesh- 12 based rendering with gaussian splatting initialization, 2025. 3

work page 2025
[53]

Ward, Francis M

Gregory J. Ward, Francis M. Rubinstein, and Robert D. Clear. A ray tracing solution for diffuse interreflection. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, page 85–92, New York, NY , USA, 1988. Association for Computing Machin- ery. 5

work page 1988
[54]

Yaldiz, Yinhao Zhu, Hong Cai, Janarbek Matai, Fatih Porikli, Tzu-Mao Li, Manmo- han Chandraker, and Ravi Ramamoorthi

Liwen Wu, Rui Zhu, Mustafa B. Yaldiz, Yinhao Zhu, Hong Cai, Janarbek Matai, Fatih Porikli, Tzu-Mao Li, Manmo- han Chandraker, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. Factorized inverse path tracing for efficient and accurate material-lighting es- timation. In2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 3825–3835, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 15

work page 2023
[55]

Scalable neural indoor scene rendering.ACM Trans

Xiuchao Wu, Jiamin Xu, Zihan Zhu, Hujun Bao, Qixing Huang, James Tompkin, and Weiwei Xu. Scalable neural indoor scene rendering.ACM Trans. Graph., 41(4), 2022. 3

work page 2022
[56]

En- vgs: Modeling view-dependent appearance with environ- ment gaussian, 2024

Tao Xie, Xi Chen, Zhen Xu, Yiman Xie, Yudong Jin, Yu- jun Shen, Sida Peng, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. En- vgs: Modeling view-dependent appearance with environ- ment gaussian, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

work page 2024
[57]

Vr-nerf: High-fidelity vir- tualized walkable spaces

Linning Xu, Vasu Agrawal, William Laney, Tony Garcia, Aayush Bansal, Changil Kim, Samuel Rota Bulò, Lorenzo Porzi, Peter Kontschieder, Aljaž Božiˇc, Dahua Lin, Michael Zollhöfer, and Christian Richardt. Vr-nerf: High-fidelity vir- tualized walkable spaces. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Con- ference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machin...

work page 2023
[58]

Psdr-room: Single photo to scene using differentiable rendering

Kai Yan, Fujun Luan, Miloš Hašan, Thibault Groueix, Valentin Deschaintre, and Shuang Zhao. Psdr-room: Single photo to scene using differentiable rendering. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. 14

work page 2023
[59]

Virtualized 3d gaussians: Flexible cluster-based level- of-detail system for real-time rendering of composed scenes

Xijie Yang, Linning Xu, Lihan Jiang, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Virtualized 3d gaussians: Flexible cluster-based level- of-detail system for real-time rendering of composed scenes. InProceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques Conference Conference Papers, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Comput- ing Mach...

work page 2025
[60]

Stablenormal: Reducing diffusion variance for stable and sharp normal.ACM Trans

Chongjie Ye, Lingteng Qiu, Xiaodong Gu, Qi Zuo, Yushuang Wu, Zilong Dong, Liefeng Bo, Yuliang Xiu, and Xiaoguang Han. Stablenormal: Reducing diffusion variance for stable and sharp normal.ACM Trans. Graph., 43(6),

work page
[61]

Milo: Multi-bounce inverse rendering for indoor scene with light-emitting objects.IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(8): 10129–10142, 2023

Bohan Yu, Siqi Yang, Xuanning Cui, Siyan Dong, Baoquan Chen, and Boxin Shi. Milo: Multi-bounce inverse rendering for indoor scene with light-emitting objects.IEEE Transac- tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(8): 10129–10142, 2023. 3, 6, 15

work page 2023
[62]

Gsdf: 3dgs meets sdf for improved neural rendering and reconstruction

Mulin Yu, Tao Lu, Linning Xu, Lihan Jiang, Yuanbo Xian- gli, and Bo Dai. Gsdf: 3dgs meets sdf for improved neural rendering and reconstruction. InAdvances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, pages 129507–129530. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024. 3

work page 2024
[63]

Inverse global illumination: recovering reflectance mod- els of real scenes from photographs

Yizhou Yu, Paul Debevec, Jitendra Malik, and Tim Hawkins. Inverse global illumination: recovering reflectance mod- els of real scenes from photographs. InProceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, page 215–224, USA, 1999. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. 3

work page 1999
[64]

Monosdf: exploring monocular geometric cues for neural implicit surface reconstruction

Zehao Yu, Songyou Peng, Michael Niemeyer, Torsten Sat- tler, and Andreas Geiger. Monosdf: exploring monocular geometric cues for neural implicit surface reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY , USA, 2022. Curran Associates Inc. 3, 7

work page 2022
[65]

Gaussian opacity fields: Efficient adaptive surface reconstruction in unbounded scenes.ACM Trans

Zehao Yu, Torsten Sattler, and Andreas Geiger. Gaussian opacity fields: Efficient adaptive surface reconstruction in unbounded scenes.ACM Trans. Graph., 43(6), 2024. 3

work page 2024
[66]

Cohen, and Brian Curless

Edward Zhang, Michael F. Cohen, and Brian Curless. Emp- tying, refurnishing, and relighting indoor spaces.ACM Trans. Graph., 35(6), 2016. 3

work page 2016
[67]

The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 586–595, 2018. 6

work page 2018
[68]

Materialrefgs: Reflective gaussian splatting with multi-view consistent material infer- ence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11387, 2025

Wenyuan Zhang, Jimin Tang, Weiqi Zhang, Yi Fang, Yu- Shen Liu, and Zhizhong Han. Materialrefgs: Reflective gaussian splatting with multi-view consistent material infer- ence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11387, 2025. 3

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

Srinivasan, Boyang Deng, Paul Debevec, William T

Xiuming Zhang, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Boyang Deng, Paul Debevec, William T. Freeman, and Jonathan T. Barron. Ner- factor: neural factorization of shape and reflectance under an unknown illumination.ACM Trans. Graph., 40(6), 2021. 3

work page 2021
[70]

Unified gaussian primitives for scene representation and rendering, 2024

Yang Zhou, Songyin Wu, and Ling-Qi Yan. Unified gaussian primitives for scene representation and rendering, 2024. 2, 3, 14

work page 2024
[71]

I2-sdf: Intrinsic indoor scene reconstruction and editing via raytracing in neural sdfs

Jingsen Zhu, Yuchi Huo, Qi Ye, Fujun Luan, Jifan Li, Dian- bing Xi, Lisha Wang, Rui Tang, Wei Hua, Hujun Bao, and Rui Wang. I2-sdf: Intrinsic indoor scene reconstruction and editing via raytracing in neural sdfs. In2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 12489–12498, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 6, 9

work page 2023
[72]

Objectgs: Object-aware scene reconstruction and scene understanding via gaussian splatting, 2025

Ruijie Zhu, Mulin Yu, Linning Xu, Lihan Jiang, Yixuan Li, Tianzhu Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, and Bo Dai. Objectgs: Object-aware scene reconstruction and scene understanding via gaussian splatting, 2025. 16

work page 2025
[73]

Ewa volume splatting

Matthias Zwicker, Hanspeter Pfister, Jeroen van Baar, and Markus Gross. Ewa volume splatting. InProceedings of the Conference on Visualization ’01, page 29–36, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society. 3 13 EAG-PT: Emission-Aware Gaussians and Path Tracing for Indoor Scene Reconstruction and Editing Supplementary Material The appendices provide supplementary mate...

work page 2001
[74]

It is able to insert reflective mesh objects into the scene and achieve realistic renders

Additional Related Work Scene Editing in 3DGRT.Methods such as 3DGRT [35] can accomplish scene editing and re-rendering to some extent. It is able to insert reflective mesh objects into the scene and achieve realistic renders. Yet, the reflection only happens on the newly inserted mesh objects, which is a one-way bounce between the object and scene, inste...

work page
[75]

For images in linear radiance, emis- sion masks can typically be obtained by simple threshold- ing, since emitters exhibit high radiance

Emission Mask Derivation Our method relies on 2D emission masks to separate emit- ters from non-emitters. For images in linear radiance, emis- sion masks can typically be obtained by simple threshold- ing, since emitters exhibit high radiance. For most scenes, includingB-,F-, andLECTUREROOM, we classify a pixel as emissive if its radiance exceeds a scene-...

work page
[76]

Following VR-NeRF [56] and FIPT [53], we capture the indoor sceneLECTUREROOM with an APS-C camera (Sony ZV-E10M2) mounted on a tri- pod

Real-World Scene Capture Our method operates on calibrated multi-view images in linear radiance space. Following VR-NeRF [56] and FIPT [53], we capture the indoor sceneLECTUREROOM with an APS-C camera (Sony ZV-E10M2) mounted on a tri- pod. The camera is operated in full manual mode with aper- ture fixed to f/8.0, ISO to 100, and focal length to 16 mm to o...

work page
[77]

While this already yields high- quality reconstructions and renderings, it still falls short of the richness of real-world materials

Discussion ModelingIn our current formulation, Gaussians are at- tached with diffuse albedos. While this already yields high- quality reconstructions and renderings, it still falls short of the richness of real-world materials. For example, highly specular objects such as the metallic range hood and mi- crowave oven in Fig. 10 are not faithfully reproduce...

work page
[78]

These use cases are illustrative only; we do not conduct task-level evaluations

Possible Applications While our experiments focus on reconstruction and editing quality, we briefly outline two downstream applications that could benefit from EAG-PT. These use cases are illustrative only; we do not conduct task-level evaluations. Interior design and virtual prototypingA homeowner first captures their existing indoor space, and the captu...

work page