pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.02678 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Axion-Like Electrophilic Portal for Pion Dark Matter

Vincenzo Fiorentino , Ji-Heng Guo , Giacomo Landini , Federico Mescia
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords Axion-like particlesSIMP dark matterDark sector portalElectrophilic ALPX17 anomalyThermal equilibriumPion dark matterCosmological constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

An axion-like particle coupling only to electrons can serve as a viable portal for pion-like dark matter around 10 MeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a minimal model in which strongly interacting massive particle dark matter exchanges energy with the Standard Model through an axion-like particle that interacts solely with electrons. This electrophilic coupling maintains thermal equilibrium in the early universe, allowing the dark sector to evolve consistently with observed relic densities. Constraints from dark matter annihilation, laboratory experiments, and astrophysical observations are applied to map the viable parameter space. The analysis finds a broader allowed region than earlier studies, with ALP masses of order 10 MeV functioning effectively as the portal. A non-zero theta angle in the dark sector further extends the space to heavier ALP masses, overlapping the region suggested by the X17 anomaly.

Core claim

An ALP that couples exclusively to electrons provides the necessary interactions to keep SIMP dark matter in thermal equilibrium with the visible sector throughout the early universe. Cosmological evolution calculations combined with bounds from annihilation rates, laboratory searches, and astrophysical data show that this setup permits a wider parameter space than previous models. ALP masses near 10 MeV remain consistent with all constraints and coincide with the mass window indicated by the X17 anomaly. Introducing a non-vanishing theta angle in the dark sector relaxes restrictions and allows viable solutions at higher ALP masses.

What carries the argument

The electrophilic ALP portal, whose electron-only coupling generates the scattering and annihilation processes that enforce thermal equilibrium between the dark and visible sectors.

If this is right

  • ALP masses of order 10 MeV remain allowed after applying all cosmological and observational constraints.
  • A non-zero dark-sector theta angle opens additional parameter space for heavier ALP masses.
  • The model predicts specific dark matter annihilation channels and ALP decay modes that experiments can test directly.
  • The 10 MeV window overlaps the parameter space favored by the X17 anomaly, linking the two phenomena.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of an ALP-electron coupling in this mass range would connect dark matter phenomenology to nuclear anomalies reported in light nuclei experiments.
  • The same portal mechanism could be adapted to other strongly interacting dark matter candidates without changing the core equilibrium requirement.
  • Future beam-dump or collider searches targeting electron-ALP interactions could directly probe the lower end of the allowed mass window.
  • If the theta angle is non-zero, the model predicts additional signatures in late-time cosmology or rare decays not explored in the baseline analysis.

Load-bearing premise

The ALP couples exclusively to electrons at a strength sufficient to maintain thermal equilibrium without extra hidden-sector interactions or late-time effects changing the cosmology.

What would settle it

A laboratory bound or cosmological measurement showing that an ALP near 10 MeV cannot produce the required electron coupling strength while still satisfying the observed dark matter relic density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02678 by Federico Mescia, Giacomo Landini, Ji-Heng Guo, Vincenzo Fiorentino.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Summary of the constraints for different choices of dark matter mass. Left: thermalization between the ALPs and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: We show for the pseudo-Goldstone interpretation of the ALP, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Summary of the constraints in the case of a non vanishing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The value of branching ratio for the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate a scenario where Strongly Interacting Massive Particle (SIMP) dark matter interacts with an axion-like particle (ALP) that couples exclusively to electrons. This minimal setup provides interactions which enforce thermal equilibrium between dark matter and the SM in the early Universe. We analyze the cosmological evolution of the dark sector and the constraints arising from dark matter annihilations, ALP laboratory searches and astrophysical observations. Our results show that the allowed parameter space is wider than previous studies and an ALP with mass $m_a \sim {\cal O}(10)~\text{MeV}$ can act as a viable portal between the visible and dark sectors. Interestingly, this mass range overlaps with the parameter space suggested by the reported $X_{17}$ anomaly. Furthermore, the introduction of non-vanishing $\theta$ angle in the dark sector of the model opens up the parameter space to heavy ALP masses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an electrophilic ALP portal for pion SIMP dark matter in which the ALP couples exclusively to electrons. This setup enforces thermal equilibrium between the dark sector and the SM. Using Boltzmann-equation solutions and relic-density contours, the authors show that the viable parameter space widens relative to prior SIMP studies, allowing ALP masses m_a ∼ O(10) MeV that overlap with the X17 anomaly region. A non-vanishing dark-sector θ angle further extends the space to heavier ALP masses while satisfying laboratory and astrophysical bounds.

Significance. If the calculations hold, the result is significant because it supplies a minimal, parameter-count-efficient portal that reconciles SIMP dark matter with thermal equilibrium requirements and widens the allowed mass range without introducing new hidden-sector degrees of freedom. The explicit Boltzmann solutions, relic-density contours, and direct comparison to existing constraints constitute a concrete, falsifiable advance over earlier SIMP analyses. The X17 overlap is presented as an observational coincidence rather than a prediction, which keeps the claim proportionate.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Lagrangian and interaction terms): the assumption that the ALP couples exclusively to electrons is load-bearing for the thermal-equilibrium claim; the text should explicitly derive the interaction rate Γ_a-e and demonstrate that it remains above the Hubble rate down to T ∼ m_π for m_a ∼ 10 MeV, rather than stating equilibrium by construction.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (θ-angle extension): the statement that non-zero θ opens heavy-ALP masses is central to the widened parameter space, yet the relic-density contours are shown only for selected θ values; a systematic scan or analytic dependence of ⟨σv⟩ on θ must be added to confirm that the heavy-mass region remains cosmologically viable without fine-tuning.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (relic-density contours): axis labels and color-bar units are missing; the caption should state whether the contours correspond to the observed Ωh² = 0.12 or to a 2σ band.
  2. [§5] §5 (constraints): the laboratory bounds from NA64 and BABAR are cited but not overlaid on the same (m_a, g_ae) plane as the cosmological contours; a combined plot would improve clarity.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract and §1: the phrase 'wider than previous studies' should be quantified by citing the specific prior SIMP parameter-space boundaries being compared.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Lagrangian and interaction terms): the assumption that the ALP couples exclusively to electrons is load-bearing for the thermal-equilibrium claim; the text should explicitly derive the interaction rate Γ_a-e and demonstrate that it remains above the Hubble rate down to T ∼ m_π for m_a ∼ 10 MeV, rather than stating equilibrium by construction.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the interaction rate strengthens the thermal-equilibrium argument. In the revised manuscript we will add the calculation of Γ_{a-e} in §3, explicitly showing that for m_a ∼ 10 MeV the rate remains above the Hubble rate down to T ∼ m_π, consistent with the Boltzmann solutions already presented. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (θ-angle extension): the statement that non-zero θ opens heavy-ALP masses is central to the widened parameter space, yet the relic-density contours are shown only for selected θ values; a systematic scan or analytic dependence of ⟨σv⟩ on θ must be added to confirm that the heavy-mass region remains cosmologically viable without fine-tuning.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. While representative θ values were shown, we will add both an analytic expression for the θ dependence of ⟨σv⟩ and a systematic scan over a range of θ in the revised §4.2 to confirm viability of the heavy-ALP region without fine-tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript derives viable parameter space for pion SIMP dark matter coupled to an electrophilic ALP by numerically solving Boltzmann equations for the dark sector's thermal evolution and relic density, then overlaying external constraints from DM annihilations, laboratory ALP searches, and astrophysical observations. These steps are independent of internal redefinitions or self-citation chains; the widening of allowed space for m_a ~ O(10) MeV and the theta-angle extension to heavier masses emerge directly from the model dynamics and imposed bounds rather than from fitted inputs renamed as predictions or uniqueness theorems imported from prior self-work. No load-bearing reduction of outputs to inputs by construction is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of an ALP that couples only to electrons and on the assumption that its interactions maintain thermal equilibrium; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are quantified in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • ALP-electron coupling strength
    Determines interaction rate and is constrained by observations but not numerically specified in abstract.
  • Dark sector theta angle
    Non-vanishing value introduced to open heavy ALP masses; treated as a free choice.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption ALP interactions enforce thermal equilibrium between dark matter and SM in the early universe
    Invoked to justify the cosmological evolution analysis.
  • domain assumption Constraints from DM annihilations, ALP lab searches, and astrophysics are independent and correctly applied
    Used to delineate the allowed parameter space.
invented entities (1)
  • Electrophilic ALP portal no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates interactions between SIMP pion dark matter and SM electrons
    New minimal construction proposed in the paper; no independent evidence provided beyond model consistency.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5453 in / 1518 out tokens · 54372 ms · 2026-05-16T07:59:15.212915+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ALP production in Lepton Flavour Violating meson, tau and gauge boson decays

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ALPs with LFV couplings above the muon mass threshold can be produced in LFV meson, tau, and gauge boson decays, yielding clean eμ signatures that enable new searches at future experiments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    These occur via the interaction in Eq

    Thermalization The relevant processes for dark matter thermalization are the elastic scatterings of dark matter with electrons and positrons. These occur via the interaction in Eq. (20) and thet-channel exchange of the ALP. This is similar to what happens in models where SIMP dark matter in- teracts with the SM via a dark photon portal [2, 21, 31]. The am...

    work page

  2. [2]

    resonant model

    Constraints The operator in Eq. (20) also provides a new annihila- tion channel for dark matter particles, namely the process 9 Indirect detection ππ -> ee fa=ma Thermalization Ce=0.1 Ce=1 fa =2πf π 0.2 0.5 1 210-1 100 101 ma[GeV] fa -1[GeV-1] mπ =0.1GeV,g ae=10-4,θ=1 Indirect detection ππ -> ee fa=ma Thermalization 2 5 10 2010-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 ma[GeV] fa...

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    The SIMPlest Miracle

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, H. Murayama, T. Volansky, and J. G. Wacker, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 021301 (2015), 1411.3727

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    SIMP Spectroscopy

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, and H. Murayama, JHEP05, 090 (2016), 1512.07917

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Elastically Decoupling Dark Matter

    E. Kuflik, M. Perelstein, N. R.-L. Lorier, and Y.-D. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221302 (2016), 1512.04545

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    WIMP and SIMP Dark Matter from the Spontaneous Breaking of a Global Group

    N. Bernal, C. Garcia-Cely, and R. Rosenfeld, JCAP04, 012 (2015), 1501.01973

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    $Z_2$ SIMP Dark Matter

    N. Bernal and X. Chu, JCAP01, 006 (2016), 1510.08527

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Production Regimes for Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    N. Bernal, X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely, T. Hambye, and B. Zaldivar, JCAP03, 018 (2016), 1510.08063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    SIMP dark matter with gauged $Z_3$ symmetry

    S.-M. Choi and H. M. Lee, JHEP09, 063 (2015), 1505.00960

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Resonant SIMP dark matter

    S.-M. Choi and H. M. Lee, Phys. Lett. B758, 47 (2016), 1601.03566

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Hidden SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter

    A. Soni and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D93, 115025 (2016), 1602.00714

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    SIMP from a strong U(1) gauge theory with a monopole condensation

    A. Kamada, M. Yamada, T. T. Yanagida, and K. Yonekura, Phys. Rev. D94, 055035 (2016), 1606.01628

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Axion-like particle assisted strongly interacting massive particle

    A. Kamada, H. Kim, and T. Sekiguchi, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016007 (2017), 1704.04505

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Simply split SIMPs

    N. Bernal, X. Chu, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D95, 115023 (2017), 1702.04906

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    J. M. Cline, H. Liu, T. Slatyer, and W. Xue, Phys. Rev. D96, 083521 (2017), 1702.07716

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    S.-M. Choi, H. M. Lee, and M.-S. Seo, JHEP04, 154 (2017), 1702.07860

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Phenomenology of ELDER Dark Matter

    E. Kuflik, M. Perelstein, N. R.-L. Lorier, and Y.-D. Tsai, JHEP08, 078 (2017), 1706.05381

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Hidden strongly interacting massive particles

    M. Heikinheimo, K. Tuominen, and K. Langæble, Phys. Rev. D97, 095040 (2018), 1803.07518

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    S.-M. Choi, H. M. Lee, P. Ko, and A. Natale, Phys. Rev. D98, 015034 (2018), 1801.07726

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    SIMPs through the axion portal

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Mcgehee, H. Murayama, and K. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D98, 115031 (2018), 1806.10139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Bernal, X

    N. Bernal, X. Chu, S. Kulkarni, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D101, 055044 (2020), 1912.06681

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    S.-M. Choi, H. M. Lee, Y. Mambrini, and M. Pierre, JHEP07, 049 (2019), 1904.04109

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    A. Katz, E. Salvioni, and B. Shakya, JHEP10, 049 (2020), 2006.15148

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Smirnov and J

    J. Smirnov and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 131301 (2020), 2002.04038

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Xing and S.-H

    C.-Y. Xing and S.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 061101 (2021), 2102.02447

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Braat and M

    P. Braat and M. Postma, JHEP03, 216 (2023), 2301.04513. 14

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Garani, M

    R. Garani, M. Redi, and A. Tesi, JHEP12, 139 (2021), 2105.03429

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    U. K. Dey, T. N. Maity, and T. S. Ray, JCAP03, 045 (2017), 1612.09074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Bernreuther, N

    E. Bernreuther, N. Hemme, F. Kahlhoefer, and S. Kulkarni (2023), 2311.17157

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    X. Chu, M. Nikolic, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 2 (2024), 2401.12283

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    X. Chu, J. Pradler, and D. Samart (2025), 2512.08517

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Garc´ ıa-Cely, G

    C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, G. Landini, and O. Zapata, Phys. Rev. D111, 063044 (2025), 2405.10367

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Garc´ ıa-Cely, G

    C. Garc´ ıa-Cely, G. Landini, L. Marsili, and ´O. Zapata (2025), 2508.21121

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Davighi, A

    J. Davighi, A. Greljo, and N. Selimovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 111804 (2025), 2401.09528

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Davighi, S

    J. Davighi, S. Moldovsky, H. Murayama, C. Scherb, and N. Selimovic (2025), 2506.05468

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Dubinski and R

    J. Dubinski and R. G. Carlberg, Astrophys. J.378, 496 (1991)

    work page 1991

  37. [37]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astro- phys. J.462, 563 (1996), astro-ph/9508025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astro- phys. J.490, 493 (1997), astro-ph/9611107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  39. [39]

    R. Dave, D. N. Spergel, P. J. Steinhardt, and B. D. Wan- delt, Astrophys. J.547, 574 (2001), astro-ph/0006218

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  40. [40]

    Subhaloes in Self-Interacting Galactic Dark Matter Haloes

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, and A. Loeb, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423, 3740 (2012), 1201.5892

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter I: Constant Density Cores and Substructure

    M. Rocha, A. H. G. Peter, J. S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, J. Onorbe, and L. A. Moustakas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 81 (2013), 1208.3025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    A. H. G. Peter, M. Rocha, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 105 (2013), 1208.3026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    O. D. Elbert, J. S. Bullock, S. Garrison-Kimmel, M. Rocha, J. O˜ norbe, and A. H. G. Peter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453, 29 (2015), 1412.1477

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    A. B. Fry, F. Governato, A. Pontzen, T. Quinn, M. Tremmel, L. Anderson, H. Menon, A. M. Brooks, and J. Wadsley, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452, 1468 (2015), 1501.00497

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rept.730, 1 (2018), 1705.02358

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Eberhart, M

    A. Eberhart, M. Fedele, F. Kahlhoefer, E. Ravensburg, and R. Ziegler (2025), 2504.05873

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Darm´ e, F

    L. Darm´ e, F. Giacchino, E. Nardi, and M. Raggi, JHEP 06, 009 (2021), 2012.07894

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Altmannshofer, J

    W. Altmannshofer, J. A. Dror, and S. Gori, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241801 (2023), 2209.00665

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    R. Z. Ferreira, M. C. D. Marsh, and E. M¨ uller, JCAP 11, 057 (2022), 2205.07896

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Adhikary, D

    A. Adhikary, D. K. Ghosh, S. Jeesun, and S. Roy (2026), 2601.04962

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Arias-Arag´ on, G

    F. Arias-Arag´ on, G. G. di Cortona, E. Nardi, and L. Veissi` ere, JHEP06, 199 (2025), 2504.00100

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, and A. Thamm, JHEP12, 044 (2017), 1708.00443

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Cornella, P

    C. Cornella, P. Paradisi, and O. Sumensari, JHEP01, 158 (2020), 1911.06279

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Calibbi, D

    L. Calibbi, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, JHEP 09, 173 (2021), 2006.04795

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, JHEP09, 056 (2022), 2110.10698

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Bertuzzo, A

    E. Bertuzzo, A. L. Foguel, G. M. Salla, and R. Z. Fun- chal, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 171801 (2023), 2202.12317

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Armando, P

    G. Armando, P. Panci, J. Weiss, and R. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D109, 055029 (2024), 2310.05827

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Y. Ema, P. J. Fox, M. Hostert, T. Menzo, M. Pospelov, A. Ray, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D112, 115028 (2025), 2507.15271

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    R. Z. Ferreira, M. C. D. Marsh, and E. Ravensburg (2025), 2510.14469

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Hostert and S

    M. Hostert and S. Urrea (2025), 2509.14085

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Altmannshofer, J

    W. Altmannshofer, J. A. Dror, P. Giffin, S. Gori, O. Jackson, K. Luong, P. Schwendimann, and S. R. Seo (2026), 2601.06254

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Bossi et al

    F. Bossi et al. (PADME), JHEP11, 007 (2025), 2505.24797

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 042501 (2016), 1504.01527

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., inJournal of Physics: Con- ference Series(2018), vol. 1056, p. 012028

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Acta Phys. Polon. B50, 675 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al.,On the interpretation of the anomalous internal pair creation in 8Be(2019), 1910.10459

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. C104, 044003 (2021), 2104.10075

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. C106, L061601 (2022), 2209.10795

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al.,Latest results on the X17 anomaly from ATOMKI(2023), 2308.06473

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., Universe10, 409 (2024), 2409.16300

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Combined Evidence for the $X_{17}$ Boson After PADME Results on Resonant Production in Positron Annihilation

    F. Arias-Arag´ on, G. G. di Cortona, E. Nardi, and C. Toni (2025), 2504.11439

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Barducci, D

    D. Barducci, D. Germani, M. Nardecchia, S. Scacco, and C. Toni, JHEP04, 035 (2025), 2501.05507

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Abdallah, R

    W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi, T. Ghosh, N. Khan, S. Roy, and S. Roy, JHEP10, 086 (2024), 2406.07643

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    D. S. M. Alves et al., Eur. Phys. J. C83, 230 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    P. B. Denton and J. Gehrlein, Phys. Rev. D108, 015009 (2023), 2304.09877

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Barducci and C

    D. Barducci and C. Toni, JHEP02, 154 (2023), [Erra- tum: JHEP 07, 168 (2023)], 2212.06453

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    J. L. Feng, T. M. P. Tait, and C. B. Verhaaren, Phys. Rev. D102, 036016 (2020), 2006.01151

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Zhang and G

    X. Zhang and G. A. Miller, Phys. Lett. B813, 136061 (2021), 2008.11288

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolin- sky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 071803 (2016), 1604.07411

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    J. L. Feng, B. Fornal, I. Galon, S. Gardner, J. Smolin- sky, T. M. P. Tait, and P. Tanedo, Phys. Rev. D95, 035017 (2017), 1608.03591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.