pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.04538 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Thermodynamic Cost of Regeneration in a Quantum Stirling Cycle

Ferdi Altintas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum Stirling cycleregeneration costquantum heat enginesCarnot boundthermodynamic efficiencyopen quantum systemsspin working substance
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accounting for the thermodynamic cost of regeneration prevents quantum Stirling engines from exceeding the Carnot efficiency bound.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the standard four-stroke regenerative quantum Stirling heat engine cycle in the weak-coupling Markovian open quantum system framework that assumes local thermal equilibrium at each stage. It shows that the regeneration step, which transfers heat internally between the working substance and a regenerator, is not thermodynamically free and requires explicit work input. When this minimum regeneration cost is set by the Carnot heat-pump limit and subtracted from the net work output, previously reported super-Carnot efficiencies disappear. The resulting efficiency remains below the Carnot bound but exceeds that of the conventional Stirling cycle without regeneration. The analysis covers both a single spin-1/2 and a pair of interacting spin-1/2 particles as working substances.

Core claim

In the regenerative quantum Stirling cycle the regeneration process is not free in a reduced open-system description and must be treated as an explicit work cost bounded below by the Carnot heat-pump limit. Including this cost modifies the cycle efficiency so that it stays strictly below the Carnot bound while remaining higher than the efficiency of the non-regenerative Stirling cycle. For the conventional cycle a rigorous Carnot bound is obtained via quantum relative entropy, and a sufficient lower bound on the regeneration cost is derived that guarantees thermodynamic consistency.

What carries the argument

The modified cycle efficiency that subtracts the minimum regeneration work input set by the Carnot heat-pump limit from the net work output.

If this is right

  • The regenerative quantum Stirling efficiency remains below the Carnot limit once the regeneration cost is included.
  • This efficiency is still strictly higher than the efficiency of the conventional Stirling cycle without regeneration.
  • A rigorous Carnot bound holds for the conventional cycle via quantum relative entropy.
  • A sufficient lower bound on regeneration cost guarantees thermodynamic consistency for the regenerative cycle.
  • Three candidate quantum regenerator models are identified for future explicit modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same accounting for regeneration cost is likely required in other quantum heat-engine cycles that assume cost-free internal heat transfer.
  • Experimental tests would need to resolve the small work inputs involved in quantum regeneration processes.
  • The result underscores the importance of treating regeneration as an open-system process rather than an ideal internal step.

Load-bearing premise

The regeneration cost is taken at its minimum value set by the Carnot heat-pump limit inside the weak-coupling Markovian framework that assumes local thermal equilibrium at each stage.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the actual work required to perform regeneration in a quantum spin-based Stirling engine, followed by computation of the resulting efficiency; if the measured efficiency exceeds the Carnot bound the central claim is falsified.

read the original abstract

We study the standard four-stroke regenerative quantum Stirling heat engine cycle, which assumes local thermal equilibrium at each stage, within the standard weak-coupling, Markovian open quantum system framework. We point out that the regeneration process is not thermodynamically free in a reduced open-system description, and we treat the required work input as an explicit regeneration cost by modifying the cycle efficiency accordingly. We consider two working substances--a single spin-$1/2$ and a pair of interacting spin-$1/2$ particles--and investigate the cycle performance by taking the regeneration cost at its minimum value set by the Carnot heat-pump limit. For comparison, we also analyze the conventional Stirling cycle without regeneration under the same conditions. The super-Carnot efficiencies reported under the cost-free regeneration assumption disappear once the regeneration cost is included: the modified efficiency stays below the Carnot bound, while still remaining higher than the efficiency of the conventional Stirling cycle. For the conventional Stirling cycle, we provide a rigorous Carnot bound using quantum relative entropy, whereas for the regenerative cycle we derive a sufficient lower bound on the regeneration cost that guarantees thermodynamic consistency. Finally, we suggest three candidate quantum regenerator models for future work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the four-stroke regenerative quantum Stirling heat engine in the weak-coupling Markovian regime for a single spin-1/2 and a pair of interacting spins. It argues that regeneration is not free in the reduced open-system description, incorporates an explicit regeneration cost set to the Carnot heat-pump minimum, and shows that the modified efficiency lies strictly below the Carnot bound while exceeding the efficiency of the conventional non-regenerative Stirling cycle. A Carnot bound is derived for the conventional cycle via quantum relative entropy, and a sufficient lower bound on regeneration cost is obtained to enforce consistency; three candidate quantum regenerator models are suggested for future study.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a needed clarification in quantum thermodynamics by showing that cost-free regeneration assumptions lead to unphysical super-Carnot efficiencies. The quantum-relative-entropy derivation of the Carnot bound for the conventional cycle and the explicit lower bound on regeneration cost are concrete strengths that improve rigor in open-system heat-engine analyses. The suggestion of concrete regenerator models also provides a clear path for follow-up work.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the three candidate quantum regenerator models are mentioned but not named or briefly characterized; adding one sentence identifying them would improve readability without lengthening the abstract.
  2. [Results] The manuscript should include a short table or plot comparing the conventional Stirling efficiency, the modified regenerative efficiency, and the Carnot bound across the two working substances to make the central numerical claim immediately visible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the manuscript, and recommendation for minor revision. The summary accurately captures the central results on the thermodynamic cost of regeneration, the Carnot bound via quantum relative entropy for the conventional cycle, and the suggested regenerator models. No specific major comments requiring point-by-point rebuttal were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the Carnot bound for the conventional Stirling cycle directly from quantum relative entropy, a standard external measure. For the regenerative cycle it supplies a sufficient lower bound on regeneration cost from thermodynamic consistency in the weak-coupling Markovian setting and adopts the Carnot heat-pump value as that minimum; this is an external thermodynamic limit rather than an internal fit or self-definition. No load-bearing steps reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction, no self-citations are invoked for uniqueness, and the efficiency comparison follows from applying the second law without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from quantum thermodynamics and the choice to take the regeneration cost at its theoretical minimum based on the Carnot heat-pump limit.

free parameters (1)
  • minimum regeneration cost = Carnot heat-pump limit
    Set explicitly to the minimum value from the Carnot heat-pump limit to modify cycle efficiency.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption local thermal equilibrium at each stage of the cycle
    Assumed in the standard four-stroke regenerative quantum Stirling cycle description.
  • domain assumption weak-coupling and Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems
    Used as the standard framework for treating the regeneration process.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1395 out tokens · 54716 ms · 2026-05-16T07:47:36.432361+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Holographic Stirling engines and the route to Carnot efficiency

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Stirling efficiency reaches Carnot when fixed-volume heat capacity is volume-independent, true for classical gases but not quantum or CFTs; holographic CFTs approach Carnot at large potentials with faster convergence ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Deffner, S

    S. Deffner, S. Campbell, Quantum Thermodynamics (Morgan and Claypool Publishers, USA, 2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Myers, O

    N.M. Myers, O. Abah, S. Deffner, Quantum thermodynamic devices: from theoretical proposals to experimental reality. AVS Quantum Sci.4, 027101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Bhattacharjee, A

    S. Bhattacharjee, A. Dutta, Quantum thermal machines and batteries, Eur. Phys. J. B94, 239 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Cangemi, C

    L.M. Cangemi, C. Bhadra, A. Levy, Quantum engines and refrigerators, Phys. Rep.1087, 1-71 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Quan, Y.X

    H.T. Quan, Y.X. Liu, C.P. Sun, F. Nori, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines. Phys. Rev. E76, 031105 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Quan, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines

    H.T. Quan, Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines. II., Phys. Rev. E79, 041129 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Huang, X.-Y

    X.-L. Huang, X.-Y. Niu, X.-M. Xiu, X.-X. Yi, Quantum Stirling heat engine and refrigerator with single and coupled spin systems, Eur. Phys. J. D68, 32 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    N. Gupt, S. Bhattacharyya, A. Ghosh, Statistical generalization of regenerative bosonic and fermionic Stirling cycles, Phys. Rev. E104, 054130 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    B. Lin, J. Chen, Performance analysis of an irreversible quantum heat engine working with harmonic oscillators, Phys. Rev. E67, 046105 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Phung, Thermodynamic performance of a quantum Stirling heat engine with a single particle confined in a cubic potential well, Physica A677, 130937 (2025)

    D.-T. Phung, Thermodynamic performance of a quantum Stirling heat engine with a single particle confined in a cubic potential well, Physica A677, 130937 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    S. Xia, M. Lv, Y. Pan, J. Chen, S. Su, Performance improvement of a fractional quantum Stirling heat engine, J. Appl. Phys.135, 034302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Y. Yin, L. Chen, F. Wu, Performance of a quantum Stirling heat engine with numerous copies of extreme relativistic particles confined in a 1D potential well, Physica A503, 58-70 (2018) 17

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    J. He, J. Chen, B. Hua, Quantum refrigeration cycles using spin- 1 2 systems as the working substance, Phys. Rev. E65, 036145 (2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    B. Lin, J. Chen, B. Hua, The optimal performance of a quantum refrigeration cycle working with harmonic oscillators, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.36, 406-413 (2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    B. Lin, J. Chen, Performance analysis of a quantum heat-pump using spin systems as the working substance, Appl. Energy78, 75-93 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    B. Lin, J. Chen, General performance characteristics of a quantum heat pump cycle using harmonic oscillators as the working substance, Phys. Scr.71, 12-19 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Huang, F

    Z. Huang, F. Wu, L. Chen, C. Wu, F. Guo, Performance optimization for an irreversible quantum Stirling cooler, J. Thermal Sci.11, 193-197 (2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Y. Yin, L. Chen, F. Wu, Y. Ge, Work output and thermal efficiency of an endoreversible entangled quantum Stirling engine with one dimensional isotropic Heisenberg model, Physica A547, 123856 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Y. Yin, X. Fang, L. Chen, Y. Ge, Optimal performance of irreversible quan- tum Stirling refrigerator with extreme relativistic particles as working substance, Physica A664, 130486 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Y. Yin, L. Chen, F. Wu, Optimal power and efficiency of quantum Stirling heat engines, Eur. Phys. J. Plus132, 45 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    J. Chen, B. Lin, B. Hua, The performance of a quantum heat engine working with spin systems, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.35, 2051-2057 (2002)

    work page 2051

  22. [22]

    F. Wu, L. Chen, F. Sun, C. Wu, Y. Zhu, Performance and optimization criteria for forward and reverse quantum Stirling cycles, Energy Convers. Mgmt.39, 733-739 (1998)

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Zhao, G.-F

    L.-M. Zhao, G.-F. Zhang, Entangled quantum Otto and quantum Stirling heat engine based on two-spin systems with Dzyaloshinski-Moriya interaction, Acta Phys. Sin.66, 240502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Gomes de Paula, W

    V. Gomes de Paula, W. S. Santana, C. Cruz, and M. Reis, Quantum thermody- namics of a power-law potential, Physica A674, 130728 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Alcala, C

    A. Alcala, C. Oncebay, O. Rojas, M. Rojas, Operational modes of a Raman- coupled two-qubit quantum thermal machine. arXiv:2601.03139 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Purkait, A

    C. Purkait, A. Biswas, Performance of Heisenberg-coupled spins as a quantum Stirling heat machine near the quantum critical point, Phys. Lett. A442, 128180 (2022) 18

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Wang, M.-H

    Y.-S. Wang, M.-H. Yung, D. Xu, M. Liu, X. Chen, Critical behavior of the quantum Stirling heat engine, Phys. Rev. A109, 022208 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    L. Xu, C. Wu, C. Ren, Quantum Stirling heat engine based on two-qubit quantum Rabi model with spin-spin coupling, Phys. Rev. A112, 032226 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Soufy, C

    H.M. Soufy, C. Benjamin, Enhanced performance across Otto, Carnot, and Stir- ling cycles revealed by flat-band thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. A112, 052215 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Cruz, H.-R

    C. Cruz, H.-R. Rastegar-Sedehi, M.F. Anka, T.R. de Oliveira, M. Reis, Quantum Stirling engine based on dinuclear metal complexes, Quantum Sci. Technol.8, 035010 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    C ¸ akmak, H.R

    S. C ¸ akmak, H.R. Rastegar Sedehi, Construction of a quantum Stirling engine cycle tuned by dynamic angle spinning, Phys. Scr.98, 105921 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    D. Das, G. Thomas, A. N. Jordan, Quantum Stirling heat engine operating in finite time, Phys. Rev. A108, 012220 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Castorene, M

    B. Castorene, M. H.-E. Groves, F. J. Pena, E. E. Vogel, P. Vargas, Maximum Quantum Work at Criticality: Stirling Engines and Fibonacci-Lucas Degeneracies. arXiv:2510.25533 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Castorene, V

    B. Castorene, V. Gomes de Paula, F. J. Pena, C. Cruz, M. Reis, P. Vargas, Quantum Level-Crossing Induced by Anisotropy in Spin-1 Heisenberg Dimers: Applications to Quantum Stirling Engines, Adv. Quantum Technol.8, e2500204 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Hamedani Raja, S

    S. Hamedani Raja, S. Maniscalco, G.S. Paraoanu, J.P. Pekola, N. Lo Gullo, Finite- time quantum Stirling heat engine, New J. Phys.23, 033034 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Aydiner, Quantum Szilard engine for the fractional power-law potentials, Sci

    E. Aydiner, Quantum Szilard engine for the fractional power-law potentials, Sci. Rep.11, 1576 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Rastegar-Sedehi, N

    H.-R. Rastegar-Sedehi, N. Papadatos, C. Cruz, Universal quantum Stirling-like engine under squeezed thermal baths, Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 199 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Scully, M.S

    M.O. Scully, M.S. Zubairy, G.S. Agarwal, H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence, Science299, 862-864 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Dillenschneider, E

    R. Dillenschneider, E. Lutz, Energetics of quantum correlations, EPL88, 50003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Gardas, S

    B. Gardas, S. Deffner, Thermodynamic universality of quantum Carnot engines, Phys. Rev. E92, 042126 (2015) 19

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Thomas, N

    G. Thomas, N. Siddharth, S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, Thermodynamics of non- Markovian reservoirs and heat engines, Phys. Rev. E97, 062108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    T. Guff, S. Daryanoosh, B.Q. Baragiola, A. Gilchrist, Power and efficiency of a thermal engine with a coherent bath, Phys. Rev. E100, 032129 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    O. Abah, E. Lutz, Energy efficient quantum machines, EPL118, 40005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Altintas, Construction of a quantum Carnot refrigerator for general working substances, Eur

    F. Altintas, Construction of a quantum Carnot refrigerator for general working substances, Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 379 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Campisi, R

    M. Campisi, R. Fazio, Dissipation, correlation and lags in heat engines, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 345002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Li, G.-Y

    P.-D. Li, G.-Y. Ding, J.-Q. Zhang, Q. Yuan, S.-Q. Dai, T.-H. Cui, F. Zhou, L. Chen, Q. Zhong, H. Jing, S ¸.K. ¨Ozdemir, M. Feng, Experimental demonstration of single-spin Stirling engine cycles with enhanced efficiency, Phys. Rev. A111, L010203 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Peterson, T.B

    J.P.S. Peterson, T.B. Batalh˜ ao, M. Herrera, A.M. Souza, R.S. Sarthour, I.S. Oliveira, R.M. Serra, Experimental characterization of a spin quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 240601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Klaers, S

    J. Klaers, S. Faelt, A. Imamoglu, E. Togan, Squeezed thermal reservoirs as a resource for a nanomechanical engine beyond the Carnot limit. Phys. Rev. X7, 031044 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    de Assis, T.M

    R.J. de Assis, T.M. de Mendon¸ ca, C.J. Villas-Boas, A.M. de Souza, R.S. Sarthour, I.S. Oliveira, N.G. de Almeida, Efficiency of a quantum Otto heat engine operating under a reservoir at effective negative temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 240602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Martinez, E

    I.A. Martinez, E. Roldan, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, J.M.R. Parrondo, R.A. Rica, Brownian Carnot engine. Nat. Phys.12, 67–70 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Camati, J.F.G

    P.A. Camati, J.F.G. Santos, R.M. Serra, Coherence effects in the performance of the quantum Otto heat engine, Phys. Rev. A99, 062103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Feldmann, R

    T. Feldmann, R. Kosloff, Quantum lubrication: Suppression of friction in a first- principles four-stroke heat engine, Phys. Rev. E73, 025107(R) (2006)

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Pedram, S

    A. Pedram, S. C. Kadıo˘ glu, A. Kabak¸ cıo˘ glu,¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, A quantum Otto engine with shortcuts to thermalization and adiabaticity, New J. Phys.25, 113014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    K¨ ose, S

    E. K¨ ose, S. C ¸ akmak, A. Gen¸ cten, I.K. Kominis,¨O.E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, Algorithmic quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E100, 012109 (2019) 20

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Zohuri, Physics of Cryogenics: An Ultralow Temperature Phenomenon, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018), pp

    B. Zohuri, Physics of Cryogenics: An Ultralow Temperature Phenomenon, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018), pp. 331–385

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    C ¸ engel, M.A

    Y.A. C ¸ engel, M.A. Boles, M. Kano˘ glu, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach (McGraw-Hill Education, 2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    R. Dann, A. Levy, R. Kosloff, Time-dependent Markovian quantum master equation, Phys. Rev. A98, 052129 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Breuer, F

    H.-P. Breuer, F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    Esposito, K

    M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, C. Van den Broeck, Entropy production as correla- tion between system and reservoir, New J. Phys.12, 013013 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Deffner, E

    S. Deffner, E. Lutz, Nonequilibrium entropy production for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 140404 (2011)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    Nielsen, I.L

    M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000)

    work page 2000

  62. [62]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    Guarnieri, C

    G. Guarnieri, C. Uchiyama, B. Vacchini, Energy backflow and non-Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A93, 012118 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Rodr´ ıguez-Briones, R

    N.A. Rodr´ ıguez-Briones, R. Laflamme, Achievable polarization for heat-bath algorithmic cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 170501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Alhambra, M

    A.M. Alhambra, M. Lostaglio, C. Perry, Heat-bath algorithmic cooling with optimal thermalization strategies, Quantum3, 188 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    A. Levy, L. Diosi, R. Kosloff, Quantum flywheel, Phys. Rev. A93, 052119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Ciccarello, S

    F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, G.M. Palma, Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions, Phys. Rep.954, 1-70 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Lorenzo, F

    S. Lorenzo, F. Ciccarello, G.M. Palma, Composite quantum collision models, Phys. Rev. A96, 032107 (2017) 21

    work page 2017