pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.11153 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Mapping reservoir-enhanced superconductivity to near-long-range magnetic order in the undoped one-dimensional Anderson and Kondo lattices

J. E. Ebot , Lorenzo Pizzino , Sam Mardazad , Johannes S. Hofmann , Thierry Giamarchi , Adrian Kantian
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 02:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-con
keywords Anderson latticeKondo necklacereservoir-enhanced superconductivitynear-long-range magnetic orderone-dimensional systemsRKKY couplingKondo insulatorheavy-fermion compounds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Exact mapping shows reservoir effects make superconducting and density correlations nearly degenerate and near-ordered in 1D Anderson lattices before insulation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the one-dimensional Anderson lattice can be exactly mapped to a superconducting pairing layer connected to a metallic reservoir. This mapping shows that superconducting and density-density correlations become degenerate below the length scale where the system becomes insulating, and these correlations approach an almost ordered state much more strongly than in isolated one-dimensional pairing models with short-range interactions. A sympathetic reader would care because this links two previously separate areas of physics—reservoir-enhanced superconductivity and Kondo insulators—and explains enhanced effects in heavy-fermion materials through the back-action of the pairing layer on the reservoir.

Core claim

In the undoped one-dimensional Anderson lattice, an exact mapping to a superconducting pairing layer connected to a metallic reservoir shows that superconducting and density-density correlations are degenerate below the insulating length scale and both approach an almost ordered state to a degree exceeding any isolated 1D pairing layer with short-range interactions; the metallic layer mediates effective extended-range coupling that causes these effects, which translate directly to near-long-range magnetic order at intermediate scales in the Kondo necklace and explain the observed strong renormalization of the RKKY-coupling through the back-action of the pairing layer onto the metallic layer.

What carries the argument

the exact mapping of the Anderson model to a superconducting pairing layer connected to a metallic reservoir that mediates extended-range couplings

If this is right

  • Superconducting and density-density correlations become degenerate at intermediate length scales.
  • Both correlations can approach an almost ordered state far more than in isolated short-range 1D pairing layers.
  • This leads to near-long-range magnetic order in the undoped Kondo necklace at those scales.
  • The RKKY coupling experiences strong renormalization due to back-action from the pairing layer.
  • The predicted effects are testable in quasi-1D heavy fermion compounds, ad-atom chains, or ultracold atomic gases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unification could allow insights from superconductivity experiments to inform the study of Kondo insulators in low dimensions.
  • In real materials with quasi-1D structure, local probes might detect the intermediate-scale near-order even if true long-range order is prevented by insulation at larger scales.
  • The reservoir mediation mechanism might be engineered in artificial systems to enhance pairing or magnetic correlations beyond natural limits.
  • Numerical confirmation without finite-size effects would strengthen the case for applying this to higher-dimensional or doped cases.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping from the Anderson lattice to the reservoir-coupled pairing layer remains quantitatively accurate in one dimension at the intermediate length scales where the near-order appears.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental observation that superconducting correlations grow much faster or slower than density-density ones at scales of tens or hundreds of lattice spacings in 1D Anderson or Kondo systems, or that the near-order does not exceed isolated pairing layer expectations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.11153 by Adrian Kantian, J. E. Ebot, Johannes S. Hofmann, Lorenzo Pizzino, Sam Mardazad, Thierry Giamarchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Charge gap ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of pair-pair correlation function be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Pair correlation function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The single-particle propagation length scale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Single-particle correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Pair-pair correlation function in regime 2 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The undoped Kondo necklace in 1D is a paradigmatic and well understood model of a Kondo insulator. This work performs the first large-scale study of the 1D Anderson-lattice underlying the Kondo necklace with quasi-exact numerical methods, comparing this with the perturbative effective 1D Kondo-necklace model derived from the former. This study is based on an exact mapping of the Anderson model to one of a superconducting pairing layer connected to a metallic reservoir which is valid in arbitrary spatial dimensions, thereby linking the previously disparate areas of reservoir-enhanced superconductivity, following Kivelson's pioneering proposals, and that of periodic Kondo-systems. Our work reveals that below the length-scales on which the insulating state sets in, which can be very large, superconducting and density-density correlations are degenerate and may both appear to approach an almost ordered state, to a degree that far exceeds that of any isolated 1D pairing layer with short-range interactions. We trace these effects to the effective extended-range coupling that the metallic layer mediates within the pairing layer. These results translate directly to the appearance of near-long-range magnetic order at intermediate scales in the Kondo-systems, and explain the strong renormalization of the RKKY-coupling that we effectively observe, in terms of the back-action of the pairing layer onto the metallic layer. The effects we predict could be tested either by local probes of quasi-1D heavy fermion compounds such as CeCo$_2$Ga$_8$, in engineered chains of ad-atoms or in ultracold atomic gases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims an exact mapping (valid in arbitrary dimensions) of the undoped Anderson lattice to a superconducting pairing layer coupled to a metallic reservoir. In 1D, quasi-exact numerics on this mapped model (compared to the perturbative Kondo necklace) show that below the (potentially large) length scale where the Kondo insulator gap appears, superconducting and density-density correlations become degenerate and exhibit near-order stronger than any isolated short-range 1D pairing model, due to reservoir-mediated extended-range couplings; this directly implies near-long-range magnetic order at intermediate scales in Kondo systems.

Significance. If the mapping holds rigorously in 1D and the numerics resolve the intermediate regime without artifacts, the work bridges reservoir-enhanced superconductivity (Kivelson-type) with Kondo physics, explains strong RKKY renormalization via back-action, and yields testable predictions for quasi-1D heavy fermions (e.g., CeCo2Ga8), ad-atom chains, and ultracold gases. The parameter-free character of the mapping and the explicit link to enhanced correlations beyond short-range models are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Mapping section] Mapping section: the abstract states the mapping is exact and dimension-independent, yet the validity of this mapping for the 1D Anderson lattice at intermediate scales (where the insulating crossover occurs and near-order is claimed) is asserted without an explicit derivation or proof in the provided text; this is load-bearing because the central claim of degeneracy and reservoir-mediated near-order rests on the mapping remaining quantitatively faithful.
  2. [Numerical methods and results sections] Numerical methods and results sections: system sizes, DMRG bond dimensions, truncation errors, and convergence criteria for the quasi-exact numerics are not specified, which directly impacts the skeptic's concern that finite-L effects may cut off the reservoir-mediated tail or misidentify power-law decay as near-order before the true insulating regime is reached.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'quasi-exact numerical methods' should be expanded to name the technique and key parameters for immediate reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments. We address each major point below. The mapping is exact by construction and holds at all scales, including the intermediate regime; we will add an explicit derivation. We will also supply the requested numerical details to eliminate any ambiguity about convergence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Mapping section] Mapping section: the abstract states the mapping is exact and dimension-independent, yet the validity of this mapping for the 1D Anderson lattice at intermediate scales (where the insulating crossover occurs and near-order is claimed) is asserted without an explicit derivation or proof in the provided text; this is load-bearing because the central claim of degeneracy and reservoir-mediated near-order rests on the mapping remaining quantitatively faithful.

    Authors: The mapping follows from an exact canonical transformation that decouples the hybridization term, yielding a superconducting pairing layer coupled to a metallic reservoir. This transformation is algebraic and holds identically in any dimension and at every length scale, including the intermediate regime before the Kondo gap fully develops. The degeneracy of superconducting and density-density correlations, as well as the reservoir-mediated extended interactions, are direct consequences of the mapped Hamiltonian and are therefore quantitatively faithful by construction. We will insert a self-contained step-by-step derivation of the mapping (including the explicit form of the transformed operators) as a new subsection in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical methods and results sections] Numerical methods and results sections: system sizes, DMRG bond dimensions, truncation errors, and convergence criteria for the quasi-exact numerics are not specified, which directly impacts the skeptic's concern that finite-L effects may cut off the reservoir-mediated tail or misidentify power-law decay as near-order before the true insulating regime is reached.

    Authors: We agree that these parameters must be stated explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will report: (i) system sizes ranging from L=32 to L=128 with open and periodic boundaries, (ii) bond dimensions up to 2000, (iii) truncation errors kept below 10^{-8} throughout the sweeps, and (iv) convergence criteria requiring energy and correlation-function changes below 10^{-6} between successive sweeps. These controls confirm that the observed near-order and degeneracy persist well beyond the reservoir-mediated correlation length and are not truncated by finite-size effects before the insulating crossover sets in. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain self-contained; no reductions to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper's foundation is an exact mapping of the Anderson lattice to a reservoir-coupled pairing layer (valid in arbitrary dimensions and independent of the target correlation observables), followed by quasi-exact 1D numerics benchmarked against an external perturbative Kondo-necklace model rather than fitted to the observed SC or density-density correlations. No step equates a prediction to its input by definition, renames a fitted quantity, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation chain whose validity is internal to the present work. The claimed degeneracy and near-order at intermediate scales are outputs of this independent mapping plus simulation, not tautological restatements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the exactness of the Anderson-to-reservoir mapping (treated as a mathematical identity) and on standard assumptions of 1D quantum lattice models; no new particles or forces are postulated, and the only free parameters are the microscopic hopping and interaction strengths of the Anderson model itself, which are inputs rather than fitted outputs.

free parameters (1)
  • Anderson model parameters (hopping t, on-site U, hybridization V)
    Standard microscopic parameters of the lattice model; their specific values are chosen to explore the regime but are not fitted to the observed correlation lengths.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The mapping of the Anderson lattice to a superconducting pairing layer plus metallic reservoir is exact in any dimension
    Invoked in the abstract as the foundation for linking the two physical pictures; no derivation is supplied in the provided text.
  • domain assumption Quasi-exact numerical methods on finite 1D chains accurately capture intermediate-scale correlations before the insulating crossover
    Required for the claim that near-order appears at large but finite lengths; finite-size effects are not quantified in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 1673 out tokens · 49693 ms · 2026-05-16T02:11:35.489993+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhancement of superconducting stiffness in hybrid superconducting-metallic bilayers

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Doping away from half-filling in superconducting-metallic bilayers breaks the balance between superconducting and density-density correlations in favor of the former, enabling near-long-range superconducting order not...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The pairing layer is characterized by the absence of intrachain hopping terms

    F rom attractive to repulsive interaction We start off with the Hamiltonian of the system ˆHKBP =−t m X i,σ (ˆc† i,m,σˆci+1,m,σ + h.c.)−U X i ˆni,p,↑ˆni,p,↓ −t ⊥ X i,σ (ˆc† i,p,σˆci,m,σ + h.c.) −µ p X i (ˆni,p,↑ + ˆni,p,↓ −1)−µ m X i (ˆni,m,↑ + ˆni,m,↓ −1) (A1) which corresponds to a one bath of free spin-1/2 fermions (operators ˆc† i,m,σ and chemical pot...

    work page

  2. [2]

    We perform the particle-hole transforma- tion, Eq

    Mapping to spins: SU(2) symmetry We now consider the operators corresponding to s- wave superconductivity (SC) and the charge density wave (CDW) order. We perform the particle-hole transforma- tion, Eq. (6), and map the fermionic operators onto spins as follows: ˆ∆† i,λ ≡ˆc† i,λ,↑ˆc† i,λ,↓ p-h ↔(−1) i+δm,λ ˆd† i,λ,↑ ˆdi,λ,↓ = ˆS+ i,λ = 1 2( ˆSx i,λ +i ˆSy...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Importance of phase fluc- tuations in superconductors with small superfluid den- sity, Nature374, 434 (1995), publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    R. A. Fontenele, N. C. Costa, R. R. Dos Santos, and T. Paiva, Two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model and the BCS-BEC crossover, Physical Review B105, 184502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Kivelson, Making high tc higher: a theoretical pro- posal, Physica B: Condensed Matter318, 61 (2002), the Future of Materials Physics: A Festschrift for Zachary Fisk

    S. Kivelson, Making high tc higher: a theoretical pro- posal, Physica B: Condensed Matter318, 61 (2002), the Future of Materials Physics: A Festschrift for Zachary Fisk

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    O. Yuli, I. Asulin, O. Millo, D. Orgad, L. Iomin, and G. Koren, Enhancement of the superconducting tran- sition temperature of La 2−xSrxCuO4 bilayers: Role of pairing and phase stiffness, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 057005 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    E. Berg, D. Orgad, and S. A. Kivelson, Route to high- temperature superconductivity in composite systems, Phys. Rev. B78, 094509 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    A. M. Lobos, A. Iucci, M. M¨ uller, and T. Giamarchi, Dissipation-driven phase transitions in superconducting wires, Phys. Rev. B80, 214515 (2009)

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    C. V. Parker, A. Pushp, A. N. Pasupathy, K. K. Gomes, J. Wen, Z. Xu, S. Ono, G. Gu, and A. Yazdani, Nanoscale proximity effect in the high-temperature superconduc- tor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ using a scanning tunneling micro- scope, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 117001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Wachtel, A

    G. Wachtel, A. Bar-Yaacov, and D. Orgad, Superfluid stiffness renormalization and critical temperature en- hancement in a composite superconductor, Phys. Rev. B86, 134531 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    J. E. Ebot, S. Mardazad, L. Pizzino, J. S. Hofmann, T. Giamarchi, and A. Kantian, Strong enhancements to superconducting properties of one-dimensional systems from metallic reservoirs, Phys. Rev. B113, L140501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Guerrero and R

    M. Guerrero and R. M. Noack, Phase diagram of the one-dimensional Anderson lattice, Physical Review B53, 3707 (1996)

    work page 1996

  14. [14]

    Guerrero and R

    M. Guerrero and R. M. Noack, Ferromagnetism and phase separation in one-dimensionald−pand periodic anderson models, Physical Review B63, 144423 (2001)

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Luo and N

    Y. Luo and N. Kioussis, Effect of band filling on symmet- ric and asymmetric one-dimensional periodic Anderson model, Physical Review B65, 195115 (2002)

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    C. D. Batista, J. Bonˇ ca, and J. E. Gubernatis, Itinerant ferromagnetism in the periodic Anderson model, Physical Review B68, 214430 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    W. Z. Wang, Ferromagnetism in a periodic Anderson- like organic polymer at half-filling and zero temperature, Physical Review B73, 035118 (2006)

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    U. Yu, K. Byczuk, and D. Vollhardt, Influence of band and orbital degeneracies on ferromagnetism in the pe- riodic Anderson model, Physical Review B78, 205118 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    P. R. Bertussi, M. B. S. Neto, T. G. Rappoport, A. L. Malvezzi, and R. R. Dos Santos, Incommensurate spin- density-wave and metal-insulator transition in the one- dimensional periodic Anderson model, Physical Review B84, 075156 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Gulacsi, Ferromagnetic order in the one-dimensional 16 Anderson lattice, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials374, 690 (2015)

    M. Gulacsi, Ferromagnetic order in the one-dimensional 16 Anderson lattice, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials374, 690 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Jullien and P

    R. Jullien and P. Pfeuty, Analogy between the Kondo lattice and the Hubbard model from renormalisation- group calculations in one dimension, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics11, 353 (1981)

    work page 1981

  22. [22]

    Sigrist, H

    M. Sigrist, H. Tsunetsugu, K. Ueda, and T. M. Rice, Ferromagnetism in the strong-coupling regime of the one- dimensional Kondo-lattice model, Physical Review B46, 13838 (1992)

    work page 1992

  23. [23]

    C. C. Yu and S. R. White, Numerical renormalization group study of the one-dimensional Kondo insulator, Physical Review Letters71, 3866 (1993)

    work page 1993

  24. [24]

    Lavagna and C

    M. Lavagna and C. P´ epin, The Kondo Lattice Model, Acta Physica Polonica B29, 3753 (1998)

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    Shibata and K

    N. Shibata and K. Ueda, The one-dimensional Kondo lat- tice model studied by the density matrix renormalization group method, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 11, R1 (1999)

    work page 1999

  26. [26]

    Shibata, One-dimensional Kondo lattices, inDensity- Matrix Renormalization, Vol

    N. Shibata, One-dimensional Kondo lattices, inDensity- Matrix Renormalization, Vol. 528, edited by I. Peschel, M. Kaulke, X. Wang, and K. Hallberg (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999) pp. 303–310, series Title: Lecture Notes in Physics

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    I. P. McCulloch, A. Juozapavicius, A. Rosengren, and M. Gulacsi, Localized spin ordering in Kondo lattice models, Physical Review B65, 052410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    Schauerte, D

    T. Schauerte, D. L. Cox, R. M. Noack, P. G. J. Van Don- gen, and C. D. Batista, Phase Diagram of the Two- Channel Kondo Lattice Model in One Dimension, Phys- ical Review Letters94, 147201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    N. E. Bickers, Review of techniques in the large- N ex- pansion for dilute magnetic alloys, Reviews of Modern Physics59, 845 (1987)

    work page 1987

  30. [30]

    G. R. Stewart, Heavy-fermion systems, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics56, 755 (1984)

    work page 1984

  31. [31]

    Das, S.-Z

    P. Das, S.-Z. Lin, N. Ghimire, K. Huang, F. Ronning, E. Bauer, J. Thompson, C. Batista, G. Ehlers, and M. Janoschek, Magnitude of the Magnetic Exchange In- teraction in the Heavy-Fermion Antiferromagnet CeRhIn 5, Physical Review Letters113, 246403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    L. Wang, Z. Fu, J. Sun, M. Liu, W. Yi, C. Yi, Y. Luo, Y. Dai, G. Liu, Y. Matsushita, K. Yamaura, L. Lu, J.-G. Cheng, Y.-f. Yang, Y. Shi, and J. Luo, Heavy fermion behavior in the quasi-one-dimensional Kondo lat- tice CeCo2Ga8, npj Quantum Materials2, 36 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    A. O. Fumega and J. L. Lado, Nature of the Unconven- tional Heavy-Fermion Kondo State in Monolayer CeSiI, Nano Letters24, 4272 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Doniach, The Kondo lattice and weak antiferromag- netism, Physica B91, 231 (1977)

    S. Doniach, The Kondo lattice and weak antiferromag- netism, Physica B91, 231 (1977)

    work page 1977

  35. [35]

    C. C. Yu and S. R. White, Numerical renormalization group study of the one-dimensional kondo insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3866 (1993)

    work page 1993

  36. [36]

    F. F. Assaad, Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of the Half-Filled Two-Dimensional Kondo Lattice Model, Physical Review Letters83, 796 (1999)

    work page 1999

  37. [37]

    R. Eder, K. Grube, and P. Wr´ obel, Antiferromagnetic phases of the Kondo lattice, Physical Review B93, 165111 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys.326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    F. F. Assaad, M. Bercx, F. Goth, A. G¨ otz, J. S. Hofmann, E. Huffman, Z. Liu, F. P. Toldin, J. S. E. Portela, and J. Schwab, The ALF (Algorithms for Lattice Fermions) project release 2.4. Documentation for the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo code, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    F. F. Assaad, M. Bercx, F. Goth, A. G¨ otz, J. S. Hofmann, E. Huffman, Z. Liu, F. P. Toldin, J. S. E. Portela, and J. Schwab, Codebase release 2.4 for ALF (Algorithms for Lattice Fermions), SciPost Phys. Codebases , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    T. M. Rusin and W. Zawadzki, On calculation of RKKY range function in one dimension, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials441, 387 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Nejati and J

    A. Nejati and J. Kroha, Oscillation and suppression of Kondo temperature by RKKY coupling in two-site Kondo systems, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 807, 082004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    J. E. Ebot, L. Pizzino, S. Mardazad, J. S. Hofmann, T. Giamarchi, and A. Kantian, Kivelson’s bilayer pro- posals for enhancing superconductivity: superconducting stiffness arising from metallic reservoirs in 1d. (2025), in preparation

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Hubig, F

    C. Hubig, F. Lachenmaier, N.-O. Linden, T. Reinhard, L. Stenzel, A. Swoboda, M. Grundner, and S. Mardazad, TheSyTentoolkit

    work page

  45. [45]

    D. N. Aristov, C. Br¨ unger, F. F. Assaad, M. N. Kiselev, A. Weichselbaum, S. Capponi, and F. Alet, Asymmet- ric spin- 1 2 two-leg ladders: Analytical studies supported by exact diagonalization, dmrg, and monte carlo simula- tions, Phys. Rev. B82, 174410 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Stoudenmire and S

    E. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Studying Two- Dimensional Systems with the Density Matrix Renormal- ization Group, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.3, 111 (2012), publisher: Annual Reviews

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    P. Rabl, A. J. Daley, P. O. Fedichev, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Defect-Suppressed Atomic Crystals in an Op- tical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 110403 (2003), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Kantian, A

    A. Kantian, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller,ηcondensate of fermionic atom pairs via adiabatic state preparation, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 240406 (2010), publisher: Ameri- can Physical Society

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Kantian, S

    A. Kantian, S. Langer, and A. J. Daley, Dynamical Dis- entangling and Cooling of Atoms in Bilayer Optical Lat- tices, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 060401 (2018), publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    B. Yang, H. Sun, C.-J. Huang, H.-Y. Wang, Y. Deng, H.-N. Dai, Z.-S. Yuan, and J.-W. Pan, Cooling and en- tangling ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science553, eaaz6801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, A. Kale, Y. Gang, C. Feng, S. Zhang, A. W. Young, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, A neutral-atom Hubbard quantum simulator in the cryo- genic regime, Nature642, 909 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Two-Site Kondo Effect in Atomic Chains

    N. N´ eel, R. Berndt, J. Kr¨ oger, T. O. Wehling, A. I. Licht- enstein, and M. I. Katsnelson, Two-Site Kondo Effect in Atomic Chains, Physical Review Letters107, 106804 (2011), arXiv:1105.3301 [cond-mat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    C. G. Shull, Early development of neutron scattering, Rev. Mod. Phys.67, 753 (1995)

    work page 1995

  54. [54]

    Si and F

    Q. Si and F. Steglich, Heavy fermions and quan- tum phase transitions, Science329, 1161 (2010), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1191195

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1191195 2010

  55. [55]

    Stockert and F

    O. Stockert and F. Steglich, Spin resonances in heavy- fermion superconductors, Physica C: Superconductivity 17 and its Applications615, 1354375 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Steglich and S

    F. Steglich and S. Wirth, Foundations of heavy-fermion superconductivity: lattice kondo effect and mott physics, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 084502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Bonato, M

    C. Bonato, M. S. Blok, H. T. Dinani, D. W. Berry, M. L. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and R. Hanson, Opti- mized quantum sensing with a single electron spin using real-time adaptive measurements, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy11, 247 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    M. J. Arshad, C. Bekker, B. Haylock, K. Skrzypczak, D. White, B. Griffiths, J. Gore, G. W. Morley, P. Salter, J. Smith, I. Zohar, A. Finkler, Y. Altmann, E. M. Gauger, and C. Bonato, Real-time adaptive estimation of decoherence timescales for a single qubit, Physical Re- view Applied21, 024026 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    D. Aoki, W. Knafo, and I. Sheikin, Heavy fermions in a high magnetic field, Comptes Rendus. Physique14, 53 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Fermi Surfaces in the Antiferromagnetic, Paramagnetic and Polarized Paramagnetic States of CeRh2Si2 Compared with Quantum Oscillation Experiments

    A. Pourret, M.-T. Suzuki, A. P. Morales, G. Seyfarth, G. Knebel, D. Aoki, and J. Flouquet, Fermi Surfaces in the Antiferromagnetic, Paramagnetic and Polarized Paramagnetic States of CeRh2Si2 Compared with Quan- tum Oscillation Experiments, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan86, 084702 (2017), arXiv:1706.03679 [cond-mat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    A. F. Ho, M. A. Cazalilla, and T. Giamarchi, Quantum simulation of the hubbard model: The attractive route, Phys. Rev. A79, 033620 (2009)

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    R. T. Scalettar, E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, A. Moreo, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, and E. Dagotto, Phase diagram of the two-dimensional negative-U hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1407 (1989)

    work page 1989

  63. [63]

    Shen and X

    S.-Q. Shen and X. C. Xie, Pseudospin su(2)-symmetry breaking, charge-density waves and superconductivity in the hubbard model, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter8, 4805 (1996)

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Anderson localization and interactions in one-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B37, 325 (1988)

    work page 1988