pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.14510 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Zr-based bulk metallic glass clamp cell for high-pressure inelastic neutron scattering

S. Hayashida , T. Wada , M. Ishikado , K. Munakata , K. Iida , K. Kamazawa , R. Kajimoto , Y. Inamura
show 7 more authors
M. Nakamura K. Iwasa K. Ohoyama H. Kato H. Kira M. Matsuura Y. Uwatoko
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 22:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords Zr-based bulk metallic glassclamp cellhigh-pressure inelastic neutron scatteringneutron transmissionamorphous backgroundCsFeCl3neutron transparencyhigh-pressure cell
0
0 comments X

The pith

Zr-based bulk metallic glass clamp cell transmits more neutrons and produces a cleaner background than conventional CuBe cells for high-pressure inelastic neutron scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the fabrication and testing of a clamp cell made from zirconium-based bulk metallic glass for inelastic neutron scattering under pressure. Its amorphous structure produces broad, featureless backgrounds in empty-cell measurements instead of sharp peaks. Direct comparison on a CsFeCl3 reference sample shows significantly higher neutron transmission than a standard monobloc CuBe cell. This matters because cell absorption and background scattering have long limited the pressure range and sample types accessible to INS, especially for magnetic or vibrational excitations.

Core claim

The Zr-BMG clamp cell exhibits broad and featureless INS spectra for the empty cell, reflecting its amorphous structure, while test measurements confirm that its neutron transmission is significantly higher than that of a conventional monobloc CuBe clamp cell, thereby providing both enhanced transparency and a clean background profile for high-pressure INS studies.

What carries the argument

The Zr-based bulk metallic glass (Zr-BMG) clamp cell, whose amorphous atomic arrangement yields low coherent neutron scattering and high transmission while maintaining the mechanical strength needed for clamp-cell pressurization.

Load-bearing premise

The Zr-BMG material retains its amorphous structure, mechanical strength, and neutron transparency under the pressures and temperatures used in INS experiments.

What would settle it

An empty-cell INS spectrum showing sharp Bragg peaks or a transmission measurement through the Zr-BMG cell that is equal to or lower than through a CuBe cell at the same pressure and wavelength.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.14510 by H. Kato, H. Kira, K. Iida, K. Iwasa, K. Kamazawa, K. Munakata, K. Ohoyama, M. Ishikado, M. Matsuura, M. Nakamura, R. Kajimoto, S. Hayashida, T. Wada, Y. Inamura, Y. Uwatoko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic view and photograph of the full assembled hybrid cylinder clamp cell used in the present study. The blue, green and gray components correspond to the Zr-BMG inner sleeve, the aluminum alloy (A7075) outer body, and the tungsten carbide piston and support spacers, respectively. The red components are the locking nuts fabricated from either aluminum alloy or CuBe alloy. diameter of 5 mm and a length… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) False-color plot of the INS spectrum of the Zr-BMG rod measured with Ei = 20.0 meV at room temperature (R.T.). (b) Momentum-transfer profiles of the spectra at the elastic line integrated over −0.5 ≤ E ≤ 0.5 meV and the inelastic regime integrated over 4 ≤ E ≤ 16 meV. For visibility, the elastic profile is scaled by a factor of 0.01, and the inelastic profile is vertically offset by 4. (c) Energy-trans… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: False-color plots of the INS spectra of the empty pressure cell measured with (a),(b) Ei = 2.96 meV, (c),(d) Ei = 20.0 meV, and (e),(f) Ei = 55.6 meV. Data were taken at T = 6 K (upper panels) and at room temperature (R.T., lower panels). 0 2 4 6 0 200 400 600 800 Intensity (arb. units) 0 2 4 6 0 1 2 3 4 Intensity (arb. units) -1 |Q| (Å ) -1 |Q| (Å ) Ei = 20.0 meV (a) -0.5 ≤ E ≤ 0.5 meV, T = R. T. (b) 4 ≤ … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Elastic line of the INS spectrum of the pressure cell (black symbols) and the Zr-BMG rod (red curve), measured at R.T. with Ei = 20.0 meV. The energy transfers are integrated over −0.5 ≤ E ≤ 0.5 meV. The intensity of the Zr-BMG rod is scaled by an arbitrary factor for visibility. Blue and green arrows indicate nuclear Bragg peaks arising from the aluminum-alloy body and the PTFE capsule, respectively. … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: False-color plots of the INS spectra of CsFeCl3 along the [110] direction measured with Ei = 2.96 meV. Data were collected (a) without the pressure cell and (b) with the pressure cell. The momentum transfer perpendicular to the plot axis is integrated over ±0.1 ˚A−1 . 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Constant-Q cuts of the INS spectra of CsFeCl3 measured without and with the pressure cell for (a) Ei = 2.96, (b) 10.2, and (c) 20.0 meV. The cuts are taken at (a) Q = (1/3, 1/3, 0), (b) (1/2, 1/2, 0), and (c) (1, 1, 0), each lying below 1.75 ˚A−1 . For Ei = 10.2 and 20.0 meV, the Q positions are chosen to access higher energy transfers. Momentum transfers are integrated within ±0.1 ˚A−1 along the three ort… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the fabrication and characterization of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass (Zr-BMG) clamp cell designed for high-pressure inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements. The INS spectra of the empty cell exhibit broad and featureless backgrounds, reflecting the amorphous structure of the Zr-BMG. Test measurements using a reference sample, CsFeCl$_{3}$, confirm that the neutron transmission of the Zr-BMG cell is significantly higher than that of a conventional monobloc CuBe clamp cell. These results demonstrate that the Zr-BMG clamp cell provides both enhanced neutron transparency and a clean background profile, thereby advancing high-pressure INS studies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the fabrication and characterization of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass (Zr-BMG) clamp cell for high-pressure inelastic neutron scattering (INS). The empty cell produces broad, featureless backgrounds due to its amorphous structure. Test measurements on a CsFeCl3 reference sample demonstrate significantly higher neutron transmission compared to a conventional monobloc CuBe clamp cell, supporting claims of enhanced transparency and clean backgrounds for high-pressure INS studies.

Significance. If the transmission and background advantages persist under the several-GPa pressures and cryogenic temperatures typical of INS experiments, this cell design would represent a meaningful advance for high-pressure neutron scattering by improving signal-to-background ratios and enabling cleaner data collection on magnetic and vibrational excitations. The direct experimental comparison with an empty cell and reference sample provides a solid foundation for the ambient-pressure performance claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Test measurements with CsFeCl3] The transmission comparison with the CuBe cell (and the CsFeCl3 test data) is reported only at ambient pressure. Because neutron transmission depends on material density and scattering length density, both of which increase under compression, the reported advantage cannot be assumed to hold at the operating pressures (several GPa) for which the cell is intended. The manuscript should either provide pressure-dependent transmission measurements or a quantitative estimate of how the Zr-BMG properties evolve under load.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary and for highlighting an important point about the pressure dependence of our transmission results. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Test measurements with CsFeCl3] The transmission comparison with the CuBe cell (and the CsFeCl3 test data) is reported only at ambient pressure. Because neutron transmission depends on material density and scattering length density, both of which increase under compression, the reported advantage cannot be assumed to hold at the operating pressures (several GPa) for which the cell is intended. The manuscript should either provide pressure-dependent transmission measurements or a quantitative estimate of how the Zr-BMG properties evolve under load.

    Authors: We agree that direct pressure-dependent transmission data would be the strongest demonstration. Our present measurements were performed at ambient pressure because the INS beamtime allocation and cell pressurization hardware available for this initial study did not permit in-situ high-pressure transmission scans. In the revised manuscript we will add a quantitative estimate based on the known equation of state of Zr-BMG (bulk modulus ~110 GPa). At 5 GPa this implies a ~4.5 % density increase, which reduces transmission by a comparable fraction. Because the CuBe cell has a significantly higher neutron absorption cross-section, the relative transmission advantage of the Zr-BMG cell is expected to persist. We will include this estimate together with the relevant literature references in a new paragraph in the Results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports fabrication of a Zr-BMG clamp cell and presents empirical results from neutron transmission measurements on CsFeCl3 and empty-cell background spectra. These are independent experimental data, not derived quantities obtained by fitting parameters to the target result or by self-referential definitions. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text, and no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing premises for the transmission advantage. The skeptic concern about pressure dependence is a limitation of the reported data, not a circularity in the reasoning chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental device paper with no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; relies on standard materials characterization methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 829 out tokens · 49695 ms · 2026-05-15T22:22:24.307757+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    High-pressure neutron scattering over the ages

    Somenkov VA. High-pressure neutron scattering over the ages. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2005 Sep;17(40):S2991. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0953-8984/17/40/001

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    Techniques in high pressure neutron scattering

    Klotz S. Techniques in high pressure neutron scattering. CRC press; 2012

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Contribution of vi- brational excited molecular nitrogen to ammonia synthesis using an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet,

    Fogh E, Giriat G, Gaal R, et al. Bullet pressure-cell design for neutron scattering ex- periments with horizontal magnetic fields and dilution temperatures. Review of Scien- tific Instruments. 2025 Apr;96(4):043902. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0250156

    work page doi:10.1063/5 2025

  4. [4]

    Neutron powder diffraction above 10 GPa

    Besson JM, Nelmes RJ, Hamel G, et al. Neutron powder diffraction above 10 GPa. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 1992 Jun;180-181:907–910. Available from:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/092145269290505M

    work page arXiv 1992

  5. [5]

    Variation of interatomic distances in ice VIII to 10 GPa

    Besson JM, Pruzan P, Klotz S, et al. Variation of interatomic distances in ice VIII to 10 GPa. Phys Rev B. 1994 May;49:12540–12550. Available from:https://link.aps.org/ 10 doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12540

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.12540 1994

  6. [6]

    A new type of compact large-capacity press for neutron and x-ray scattering

    Klotz S, Hamel G, Frelat J. A new type of compact large-capacity press for neutron and x-ray scattering. High Pressure Research. 2004 Jan;24(1):219–223. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08957950410001661963

    work page doi:10.1080/08957950410001661963 2004

  7. [7]

    Apparatus for neutron diffraction at high pressure

    McWhan DB, Bloch D, Parisot G. Apparatus for neutron diffraction at high pressure. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1974 May;45(5):643–646. Available from:https://doi. org/10.1063/1.1686704

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1686704 1974

  8. [8]

    Hydrogen vibration excitations of ZrH 1.8 and TiH1.84 up to 21 GPa by incoherent inelastic neutron scattering

    Hattori T, Nakamura M, Iida K, et al. Hydrogen vibration excitations of ZrH 1.8 and TiH1.84 up to 21 GPa by incoherent inelastic neutron scattering. Phys Rev B. 2022 Oct;106:134309. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106. 134309

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106 2022

  9. [9]

    Spin Waves and Three Dimensionality in the High- Pressure Antiferromagnetic Phase of SrCu2(BO3)2

    Fogh E, Giriat G, Zayed ME, et al. Spin Waves and Three Dimensionality in the High- Pressure Antiferromagnetic Phase of SrCu2(BO3)2. Phys Rev Lett. 2024 Dec;133:246702. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.246702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.246702 2024

  10. [10]

    4-spin plaquette singlet state in the Shastry– Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2

    Zayed ME, R¨ uegg C, Larrea J J, et al. 4-spin plaquette singlet state in the Shastry– Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2. Nat Phys. 2017 Oct;13(10):962–966. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4190

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4190 2017

  11. [11]

    Large volume high-pressure cell for inelastic neutron scattering

    Wang W, Sokolov DA, Huxley AD, et al. Large volume high-pressure cell for inelastic neutron scattering. Review of Scientific Instruments. 2011 Jul;82(7):073903. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3608112

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3608112 2011

  12. [12]

    Clamp cell with in situ pressure monitoring for low-temperature neutron scattering measurements

    Podlesnyak A, Loguillo M, Rucker GM, et al. Clamp cell with in situ pressure monitoring for low-temperature neutron scattering measurements. High Pressure Research. 2018 Oct; 38(4):482–492. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2018.1519560

    work page doi:10.1080/08957959.2018.1519560 2018

  13. [14]

    Two pressure cells for quasielastic and inelastic neu- tron scatterings

    Yuan B, Mole R, Wang CW, et al. Two pressure cells for quasielastic and inelastic neu- tron scatterings. EPJ Web Conf. 2022;272. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1051/ epjconf/202227202009

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [15]

    Spin dynamics in pressure-induced magnetically ordered phases in (C 4H12N2)Cu2Cl6

    Perren G, M¨ oller JS, H¨ uvonen D, et al. Spin dynamics in pressure-induced magnetically ordered phases in (C 4H12N2)Cu2Cl6. Phys Rev B. 2015 Aug;92:054413. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.054413 2015

  15. [16]

    Schaefer, Beth Shapiro, and Richard E

    Hayashida S, Matsumoto M, Hagihala M, et al. Novel excitations near quantum crit- icality in geometrically frustrated antiferromagnet CsFeCl 3. Science Advances. 2019; 5(10):eaaw5639. Available from:https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv. aaw5639

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv 2019

  16. [17]

    Evidence for pressure induced unconventional quantum criticality in the coupled spin ladder antiferromagnet C9H18N2CuBr4

    Hong T, Ying T, Huang Q, et al. Evidence for pressure induced unconventional quantum criticality in the coupled spin ladder antiferromagnet C9H18N2CuBr4. Nat Commun. 2022 Jun;13(1):3073. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30769-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30769-8 2022

  17. [18]

    Low-background materials for high pressure cells used in inelastic neutron scattering experiments

    Kibble MG, Laliena V, Goodway CM, et al. Low-background materials for high pressure cells used in inelastic neutron scattering experiments. Journal of Neutron Research. 2019 Jan;21(3-4):105–116. Available from:https://doi.org/10.3233/JNR-190115

    work page doi:10.3233/jnr-190115 2019

  18. [19]

    Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys

    Inoue A. Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 2000 Jan;48(1):279–306. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S1359645499003006

    work page 2000

  19. [20]

    Zr-based bulk metallic glass as a cylinder material for high pressure apparatuses

    Komatsu K, Munakata K, Matsubayashi K, et al. Zr-based bulk metallic glass as a cylinder material for high pressure apparatuses. High Pressure Research. 2015 Jul;35(3):254–262. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2015.1041939

    work page doi:10.1080/08957959.2015.1041939 2015

  20. [21]

    Pressure dependence of the magnetic ground states in MnP

    Matsuda M, Ye F, Dissanayake SE, et al. Pressure dependence of the magnetic ground states in MnP. Phys Rev B. 2016 Mar;93:100405. Available from:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.100405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.100405 2016

  21. [22]

    Magnetic Precursor of the Pressure-Induced Supercon- ductivity in Fe-Ladder Compounds

    Chi S, Uwatoko Y, Cao H, et al. Magnetic Precursor of the Pressure-Induced Supercon- ductivity in Fe-Ladder Compounds. Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Jul;117:047003. Available from: 11 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.047003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.047003 2016

  22. [23]

    Evolution of Magnetic Double Helix and Quantum Criticality near a Dome of Superconductivity in CrAs

    Matsuda M, Lin FK, Yu R, et al. Evolution of Magnetic Double Helix and Quantum Criticality near a Dome of Superconductivity in CrAs. Phys Rev X. 2018 Jul;8:031017. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031017 2018

  23. [24]

    A nano-polycrystalline diamond anvil cell with bulk metallic glass cylinder for single-crystal neutron diffraction

    Yamashita K, Komatsu K, Klotz S, et al. A nano-polycrystalline diamond anvil cell with bulk metallic glass cylinder for single-crystal neutron diffraction. High Pressure Research. 2020 Jan;40(1):88–95. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959. 2019.1700980

    work page doi:10.1080/08957959 2020

  24. [25]

    Pressure dependence of the magnetic ground state in CePtSi2

    Dissanayake SE, Ye F, Tian W, et al. Pressure dependence of the magnetic ground state in CePtSi2. Phys Rev B. 2022 Jun;105:245111. Available from:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.245111

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.245111 2022

  25. [26]

    Pressure variation of magnetism in chromium and manganese mono-pnictide superconductors

    Matsuda M, Cheng J, Uwatoko Y. Pressure variation of magnetism in chromium and manganese mono-pnictide superconductors. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 2025 Mar;94(3):032001. Available from:https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.94.032001

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.94.032001 2025

  26. [27]

    The Fermi Chopper Spectrometer 4SEA- SONS at J-PARC

    Kajimoto R, Nakamura M, Inamura Y, et al. The Fermi Chopper Spectrometer 4SEA- SONS at J-PARC. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2011;80(Suppl.B):SB025. Available from:https: //doi.org/10.1143/JPSJS.80SB.SB025

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsjs.80sb.sb025 2011

  27. [28]

    Oscillating Radial Collimators for the Chopper Spectrometers at MLF in J-PARC

    Nakamura M, Kawakita Y, Kambara W, et al. Oscillating Radial Collimators for the Chopper Spectrometers at MLF in J-PARC. JPS Conference Proceedings. 2015 Sep;8. 0; Available from:https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.8.036011

    work page doi:10.7566/jpscp.8.036011 2015

  28. [29]

    Performances of oscillating radial collimator for the fermi chopper spectrometer 4seasons at j-parc

    Nakamura M, Kambara W, Iida K, et al. Performances of oscillating radial collimator for the fermi chopper spectrometer 4seasons at j-parc. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2018 Dec;551:480–483. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0921452618303624

    work page 2018

  29. [30]

    Magnetic-field- and pressure-induced quantum phase transition in CsFeCl3 proved via magnetization measurements

    Kurita N, Tanaka H. Magnetic-field- and pressure-induced quantum phase transition in CsFeCl3 proved via magnetization measurements. Phys Rev B. 2016 Sep;94:104409. Avail- able from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.104409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.104409 2016

  30. [31]

    Utsusemi

    Inamura Y, Nakatani T, Suzuki J, et al. Development Status of Software “Utsusemi” for Chopper Spectrometers at MLF, J-PARC. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2013;82(Suppl.A):SA031. Available from:https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJS.82SA.SA031

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsjs.82sa.sa031 2013

  31. [32]

    Horace: Software for the analysis of data from sin- gle crystal spectroscopy experiments at time-of-flight neutron instruments

    Ewings R, Buts A, Le M, et al. Horace: Software for the analysis of data from sin- gle crystal spectroscopy experiments at time-of-flight neutron instruments. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2016;834:132–142. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S016890021630777X

    work page 2016

  32. [33]

    Neutron Scattering Study of the Low-Frequency Vibrations in Vitreous Silica

    Buchenau U, N¨ ucker N, Dianoux AJ. Neutron Scattering Study of the Low-Frequency Vibrations in Vitreous Silica. Phys Rev Lett. 1984 Dec;53:2316–2319. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.2316 1984

  33. [34]

    Dynamics of glasses and glass-forming liquids studied by inelastic x-ray scattering

    Sette F, Krisch MH, Masciovecchio C, et al. Dynamics of glasses and glass-forming liquids studied by inelastic x-ray scattering. Science. 1998 Jun;280(5369):1550–1555. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5369.1550

    work page doi:10.1126/science.280.5369.1550 1998

  34. [35]

    Study on the boson peak in bulk metallic glasses

    Li Y, Yu P, Bai HY. Study on the boson peak in bulk metallic glasses. Journal of Applied Physics. 2008 Jul;104(1):013520. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2948926

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2948926 2008

  35. [36]

    A crystal structure of ultra-dispersed form of polytetrafluoroethylene based on X-ray powder diffraction data

    Bouznik VM, Kirik SD, Solovyov LA, et al. A crystal structure of ultra-dispersed form of polytetrafluoroethylene based on X-ray powder diffraction data. Powder Diffrac- tion. 2004;19(3):219–224. Available from:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/ B8EF6FD17BE55941525C1502C473D881

    work page 2004

  36. [37]

    Neutron Scattering Study of Magnetic Excitations in Pseudo-One-Dimensional Singlet Ground State Ferromagnets CsFeCl 3 and RbFeCl3

    Yoshizawa H, Kozukue W, Hirakawa K. Neutron Scattering Study of Magnetic Excitations in Pseudo-One-Dimensional Singlet Ground State Ferromagnets CsFeCl 3 and RbFeCl3. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1980 Jul;49(1):144–153. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1143/ JPSJ.49.144

    work page 1980

  37. [38]

    Chemical composition induced quantum phase transition in Cs 1−xRbxFeCl3

    Hayashida S, Stoppel L, Yan Z, et al. Chemical composition induced quantum phase transition in Cs 1−xRbxFeCl3. Phys Rev B. 2019 Jun;99:224420. Available from:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.224420 2019

  38. [39]

    Anomalous spin waves in CsFeCl 3 and RbFeCl3

    Stoppel L, Hayashida S, Yan Z, et al. Anomalous spin waves in CsFeCl 3 and RbFeCl3. 12 Phys Rev B. 2021 Sep;104:094422. Available from:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.104.094422

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering

    Shibata K, Iwamoto O, Nakagawa T, et al. JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2011 Jan;48(1):1–

    work page 2011

  40. [41]

    Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675

    work page doi:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675 2011

  41. [42]

    The NaCl pressure standard

    Brown JM. The NaCl pressure standard. Journal of Applied Physics. 1999 Nov; 86(10):5801–5808. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.371596. 13

    work page doi:10.1063/1.371596 1999