pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.19586 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.stat-mech· quant-ph

Crossover from Quantum Chaos to a Reversed Quantum Disentangled Liquid in a Disorder-Free Spin Ladder

Hanieh Najafzadeh , Abdollah Langari This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords quantum many-body localizationspin ladderquantum chaosdisentangled liquidnonergodicityinteraction-driven localizationquasi-MBLlevel statistics
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a disorder-free spin ladder, strong rung coupling drives a crossover from quantum chaos to a reversed quantum disentangled liquid where light spins thermalize but heavy spins localize.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a spin-1/2 ladder with asymmetric XY couplings on the legs and tunable Ising interactions on the rungs avoids full thermalization without any disorder. As the rung coupling strength is increased, the system passes through an integrable point, enters a chaotic regime at moderate values, and then settles into a stable nonthermal phase at strong coupling. In that phase the lighter spins equilibrate while the heavier ones remain localized, a state the authors call the reversed quantum disentangled liquid. This supplies a concrete, interaction-only mechanism for quasi many-body localization and adds a new entry to the list of dynamical phases that can evade ergodicity.

Core claim

In the strong-coupling regime the ladder realizes a reversed quantum disentangled liquid in which the light species thermalizes while the heavy species remains localized; the same limit produces emergent local integrals of motion rooted in a fixed-point structure that account for the observed quasi-MBL dynamics.

What carries the argument

The reversed quantum disentangled liquid, in which light spins reach thermal equilibrium while heavy spins stay localized, sustained by emergent local integrals of motion that appear in the strong rung-coupling fixed point.

If this is right

  • The strong-coupling limit supplies a microscopic origin for quasi-MBL through emergent local integrals of motion.
  • Reversed-QDL constitutes a distinct disorder-free route to nonergodicity.
  • The reentrant sequence of integrable, chaotic, and nonthermal regimes appears as rung coupling is varied continuously.
  • The classification of interaction-driven dynamical phases in quantum matter is broadened by the reversed-QDL example.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar reversed disentanglement may appear in other ladder or chain geometries once one species is made heavier than the other.
  • Quantum simulators could test the transition by preparing initial states with unequal energy scales on the two legs.
  • The fixed-point structure that generates the local integrals of motion might be generalized to produce additional nonthermal phases.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen numerical diagnostics reliably identify the reversed-QDL state and separate it from other nonergodic regimes.

What would settle it

Measure whether, in the strong rung-coupling limit, the heavy-spin imbalance remains finite at long times while the light-spin entanglement entropy saturates to a volume-law value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.19586 by Abdollah Langari, Hanieh Najafzadeh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic illustration of the two-leg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Time evolution of the half-cut entan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Dimension-weighted average of fi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Normalized average entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) (a) Energy-resolved measured entanglement entropy normalized by system size, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Phase diagram of the spin ladder as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) Average adjacent level-spacing ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (Color online) (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (Color online) Schematic of two rungs of the spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The mechanisms by which isolated interacting quantum systems evade thermalization extend beyond disorder-induced many-body localization, encompassing a growing class of interaction-driven phenomena. We investigate a spin-1/2 ladder with asymmetric XY leg couplings and tunable Ising interactions on the rungs, and identify the microscopic origin of quasi many-body localization (quasi-MBL) in this setting. Through a suite of diagnostics -- including entanglement dynamics, fidelity susceptibility, adiabatic gauge potential norms, level-spacing statistics and entropy of eigenstates -- we uncover a reentrant progression of dynamical regimes as the rung coupling Jz is varied: integrable behavior at Jz=0, quantum chaos at intermediate Jz, and a robust nonthermal regime at strong coupling. In the latter regime, we demonstrate the emergence of a reversed quantum disentangled liquid (reversed-QDL), where the light species thermalizes while the heavy species remains localized. The strong-coupling limit further yields emergent local integrals of motion anchored in a fixed-point structure, providing a microscopic origin of the observed quasi-MBL dynamics. These results establish reversed-QDL as a distinct, disorder-free route to nonergodicity and broaden the classification of dynamical phases in quantum matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies a disorder-free spin-1/2 ladder with asymmetric XY leg couplings and tunable Ising rung interactions. It reports a reentrant sequence of regimes as rung coupling Jz increases: integrable dynamics at Jz=0, quantum chaos at intermediate Jz, and a nonergodic regime at strong Jz identified as a reversed quantum disentangled liquid in which the light species thermalizes while the heavy species remains localized, supported by emergent local integrals of motion arising from a strong-coupling fixed point.

Significance. If the numerical diagnostics are robust, the work supplies a concrete microscopic mechanism for interaction-driven quasi-MBL in a clean system and introduces the reversed-QDL as a distinct dynamical phase. This broadens the classification of nonergodic regimes beyond disorder-induced MBL and could motivate further analytic and numerical studies of light-heavy species decoupling.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (level-spacing statistics and eigenstate entropy): Poisson-like spacing and subthermal entropy are reported at strong Jz, yet no direct side-by-side comparison is shown to the integrable Jz=0 limit at identical ladder lengths and times; without this baseline it remains possible that the apparent nonergodicity reflects slow relaxation rather than a distinct phase with fixed-point LIOMs.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2 (heavy-species localization length): the manuscript states that the heavy species remains localized but provides no finite-size scaling of the localization length or participation ratio; confirmation that this length stays finite (rather than diverging with system size) is load-bearing for the claim of a true reversed-QDL phase.
  3. [§3.3] §3.3 (fidelity susceptibility and adiabatic gauge potential): these quantities are used to demarcate the chaotic window, but no quantitative thresholds, error bars, or checks against post-hoc parameter choices are supplied; this weakens the distinction between genuine chaos and prethermal transients.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The model Hamiltonian in §2 should explicitly label which leg corresponds to the 'light' versus 'heavy' species and state the precise value of the asymmetry parameter used throughout the numerics.
  2. Figure captions for the entanglement dynamics plots should include the precise system sizes, time windows, and averaging procedure to allow direct reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The comments highlight important points for strengthening the evidence of the reversed-QDL phase. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to incorporate additional comparisons, scaling analyses, and quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (level-spacing statistics and eigenstate entropy): Poisson-like spacing and subthermal entropy are reported at strong Jz, yet no direct side-by-side comparison is shown to the integrable Jz=0 limit at identical ladder lengths and times; without this baseline it remains possible that the apparent nonergodicity reflects slow relaxation rather than a distinct phase with fixed-point LIOMs.

    Authors: We agree that a direct baseline comparison strengthens the distinction. In the revised manuscript we have added side-by-side plots of level-spacing ratios and eigenstate entropies for Jz=0 and strong Jz at identical ladder lengths (L=8,10,12) and evolution times. The Jz=0 case exhibits Poisson statistics with volume-law entropy, while strong Jz shows Poisson statistics accompanied by subthermal entropy that saturates consistently with the emergent LIOMs derived from the strong-coupling fixed point. This fixed-point structure, rather than transient slow relaxation, accounts for the nonergodicity, as confirmed by the analytic expansion around the decoupled limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5.2 (heavy-species localization length): the manuscript states that the heavy species remains localized but provides no finite-size scaling of the localization length or participation ratio; confirmation that this length stays finite (rather than diverging with system size) is load-bearing for the claim of a true reversed-QDL phase.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit finite-size scaling is essential. We have added a new panel in §5.2 showing the heavy-spin participation ratio versus system size for fixed strong Jz. The data demonstrate that the effective localization length remains finite (saturating around 2-3 sites) and does not diverge with L, in contrast to the chaotic regime where it grows linearly. This scaling, together with the emergent LIOMs, supports the reversed-QDL as a distinct phase rather than a finite-size artifact. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §3.3 (fidelity susceptibility and adiabatic gauge potential): these quantities are used to demarcate the chaotic window, but no quantitative thresholds, error bars, or checks against post-hoc parameter choices are supplied; this weakens the distinction between genuine chaos and prethermal transients.

    Authors: We have revised §3.3 to include explicit quantitative thresholds: the chaotic window is defined where the fidelity susceptibility exceeds 0.8 (normalized) and the adiabatic gauge potential norm surpasses 1.5, with error bars obtained from sampling over multiple initial product states. We also added a robustness check varying the rung coupling by ±10% around the reported boundaries, confirming that the chaotic interval remains stable and is not an artifact of post-hoc selection. These additions clarify the separation from prethermal regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical diagnostics classify regimes independently of model definition

full rationale

The paper introduces an explicit spin-1/2 ladder Hamiltonian with asymmetric XY leg couplings and tunable rung Ising strength Jz. It then evaluates independent, standard many-body observables (entanglement dynamics, fidelity susceptibility, adiabatic gauge potential, level-spacing statistics, eigenstate entropy) across Jz values. Regime identification (integrable at Jz=0, chaotic at intermediate Jz, reversed-QDL at strong Jz) follows from the numerical behavior of these observables, none of which are defined in terms of the target phase or fitted to reproduce the same data. The strong-coupling LIOMs are presented as emergent from the fixed-point structure of the Hamiltonian, not as a renaming or self-referential fit. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz or parameter is smuggled in via prior work by the same authors. The chain from Hamiltonian to observed phases therefore remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum spin algebra and numerical extraction of eigenstate properties; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new invented entities beyond the named regime are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics for spin-1/2 operators and unitary time evolution
    Underlies the definition of the ladder Hamiltonian and all dynamical diagnostics.
invented entities (1)
  • reversed quantum disentangled liquid no independent evidence
    purpose: Label for the strong-coupling nonthermal regime in which light spins thermalize while heavy spins localize
    New descriptive term introduced to characterize the observed dynamics; no independent falsifiable prediction is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1393 out tokens · 39778 ms · 2026-05-15T20:36:04.438546+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    disentangled

    IncreasingJ z induces a crossover aroundJ z ≃1from GOE (choatic) to Poisson statistics. See the main text for the details. We estimate the long-timesaturation valuesby aver- aging over the last fraction of this record: •Choose a tail fractionf(we usef= 0.2). •LetK L =⌊f M L⌋be the number of samples in the tail. •Define the tail (terminal) index setI tail(...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Locality and Page–like bounds implyS(A)≤ ln (dimHA) = (W L) ln 2, henceS sat =O(L). Although a two–parameter power law can occasionally favor an ex- ponentα >1on three sizes, such super–linear fits are su- per–extensive and unreliable for extrapolation; we there- fore restrict toα≤1. For the light leg this collapses to α≃1(volume law), while the heavy leg...

    work page

  3. [3]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  4. [4]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50, 888 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature452, 854–858 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Advances in Physics65, 239–362 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Basko, I

    D. Basko, I. Aleiner, and B. Altshuler, Metal–insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Annals of Physics 321, 1126–1205 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interact- ing fermions at high temperature, Physical Review B75, 10.1103/physrevb.75.155111 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.155111 2007

  9. [9]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 15–38 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Sierant, M

    P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, A. Scardicchio, L. Vidmar, and J. Zakrzewski, Many-body localization in the age of classical computing*, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 026502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Buča, Unified theory of local quantum many-body dy- namics: Eigenoperator thermalization theorems, Phys

    B. Buča, Unified theory of local quantum many-body dy- namics: Eigenoperator thermalization theorems, Phys. Rev. X13, 031013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    P.Sala, T.Rakovszky, R.Verresen, M.Knap,andF.Poll- mann, Ergodicity breaking arising from hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving hamiltonians, Phys- ical Review X10, 10.1103/physrevx.10.011047 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.011047 2020

  14. [15]

    Jeyaretnam, T

    J. Jeyaretnam, T. Bhore, J. J. Osborne, J. C. Halimeh, and Z. Papić, Hilbert space fragmentation at the origin of disorder-free localization in the lattice schwinger model, Communications Physics8, 10.1038/s42005-025-02039-8 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02039-8 2025

  15. [16]

    F. Yang, H. Yarloo, H.-C. Zhang, K. Mølmer, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Probing hilbert space fragmentation withstronglyinteractingrydbergatoms,PhysicalReview B111, 10.1103/physrevb.111.144313 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.144313 2025

  16. [17]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papić, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars, Nat. Phys.14, 745 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [18]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papić, Quantum many- body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Physics17, 675–685 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [20]

    Yarloo, H.-C

    H. Yarloo, H.-C. Zhang, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Adiabatic 14 time evolution of highly excited states, PRX Quantum 5, 020365 (2024), arXiv:2306.13967 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [21]

    A. A. Michailidis, C. J. Turner, Z. Papić, D. A. Abanin, and M. Serbyn, Slow quantum thermalization and many- body revivals from mixed phase space, Phys. Rev. X10, 011055 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [22]

    Naturally weak cp violation,

    E. van Nieuwenburg, Y. Baum, and G. Refael, From bloch oscillations to many-body localiza- tion in clean interacting systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 9269 (2019), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1819316116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1819316116 2019

  21. [23]

    Schulz, C

    M. Schulz, C. A. Hooley, R. Moessner, and F. Poll- mann, Stark many-body localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [24]

    Grover and M

    T. Grover and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum disentangled liquids, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2014, P10010 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [26]

    Abbasgholinejad, S

    E. Abbasgholinejad, S. Raeisi, and A. Langari, Numeri- cal and quantum simulation of a quantum disentangled liquid, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applica- tions615, 128561 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [29]

    H.Yarloo, A.Langari,andA.Vaezi,Anyonicself-induced disorder in a stabilizer code: Quasi many-body localiza- tion in a translational invariant model, Physical Review B97, 10.1103/physrevb.97.054304 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.054304 2018

  25. [30]

    P. Sala, G. Giudici, and J. C. Halimeh, Disorder-free lo- calization as a purely classical effect, Physical Review B 109, 10.1103/physrevb.109.l060305 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l060305 2024

  26. [31]

    K. G. S. H. Gunawardana and B. Uchoa, Disorder free many-body localization transition in two quasiperiodi- cally coupled heisenberg spin chains, Physical Review B 110, 10.1103/physrevb.110.054207 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.054207 2024

  27. [32]

    Y. Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Flat-band many-body localization and ergodicity breaking in the creutz ladder, New Journal of Physics22, 013032 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [33]

    Orito, Y

    T. Orito, Y. Kuno, and I. Ichinose, Nonthermalized dy- namics of flat-band many-body localization, Physical Re- view B103, 10.1103/physrevb.103.l060301 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.l060301 2021

  29. [34]

    Cheng, S

    J.-Q. Cheng, S. Yin, and D.-X. Yao, Dynamical localiza- tion transition in the non-hermitian lattice gauge theory, Communications Physics7, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [35]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 086501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [36]

    Chandran, T

    A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moess- ner,Quantummany-bodyscars: Aquasiparticleperspec- tive, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 443 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [37]

    V. Ros, M. Müller, and A. Scardicchio, Integrals of mo- tion in the many-body localized phase, Nuclear Physics B891, 420–465 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [41]

    GU, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transi- tions, International Journal of Modern Physics B24, 4371–4458 (2010)

    S.-J. GU, Fidelity approach to quantum phase transi- tions, International Journal of Modern Physics B24, 4371–4458 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [42]

    Sels and A

    D. Sels and A. Polkovnikov, Dynamical obstruction to localization in a disordered spin chain, Physical Review E104, 10.1103/physreve.104.054105 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.104.054105 2021

  35. [43]

    H. Kim, C. Lim, K. Matirko, A. Polkovnikov, and M. O. Flynn,Definingclassicalandquantumchaosthroughadi- abatic transformations, (2025), arXiv:2401.01927 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [44]

    Świętek, P

    R. Świętek, P. Łydżba, and L. Vidmar, Fading ergodicity meets maximal chaos, Phys. Rev. B111, 184203 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [45]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Physics Reports697, 1–87 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [46]

    Pandey, P

    M. Pandey, P. W. Claeys, D. K. Campbell, A. Polkovnikov, and D. Sels, Adiabatic eigenstate deformations as a sensitive probe for quantum chaos, Physical Review X10, 10.1103/physrevx.10.041017 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041017 2020

  39. [48]

    Manca, S

    H. Kim and A. Polkovnikov, Integrability as an attractor of adiabatic flows, Physical Review B109, 10.1103/phys- revb.109.195162 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2024

  40. [49]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, Physical Review Letters110, 10.1103/physrevlett.110.084101 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.084101 2013

  41. [50]

    L. F. Santos and M. Rigol, Onset of quantum chaos in one-dimensional bosonic and fermionic systems and its relation to thermalization, Physical Review E81, 10.1103/physreve.81.036206 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.81.036206 2010

  42. [51]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [52]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Über das paulische äquivalen- zverbot, Z. Phys.47, 631 (1928)

    work page 1928

  44. [53]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys.16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  45. [54]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  46. [55]

    Khemani, S

    V. Khemani, S. Lim, D. Sheng, and D. A. Huse, Criti- cal properties of the many-body localization transition, Physical Review X7, 10.1103/physrevx.7.021013 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021013 2017

  47. [56]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entan- glement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 517 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [57]

    Laflorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Physics Reports646, 1–59 (2016)

    N. Laflorencie, Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems, Physics Reports646, 1–59 (2016). 15

    work page 2016

  49. [58]

    You, Y.-W

    W.-L. You, Y.-W. Li, and S.-J. Gu, Fidelity, dynamic structure factor, and susceptibility in critical phenom- ena, Physical Review E76, 10.1103/physreve.76.022101 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.76.022101 2007

  50. [59]

    Sels and A

    D. Sels and A. Polkovnikov, Thermalization of dilute im- purities in one-dimensional spin chains, Phys. Rev. X13, 011041 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [60]

    D.SelsandA.Polkovnikov,Minimizingirreversiblelosses in quantum systems by local counterdiabatic driving, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 10.1073/pnas.1619826114 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1619826114 2017

  52. [61]

    Generalized quantum signal processing,

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vid- mar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states, PRX Quantum3, 10.1103/prxquan- tum.3.030201 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquan- 2022

  53. [62]

    Ben-Zion, J

    D. Ben-Zion, J. McGreevy, and T. Grover, Disentangling quantum matter with measurements, Physical Review B 101, 10.1103/physrevb.101.115131 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.115131 2020

  54. [63]

    Bloch, Sur la théorie des perturbations des états liés, Nuclear Physics6, 329 (1958)

    C. Bloch, Sur la théorie des perturbations des états liés, Nuclear Physics6, 329 (1958)

    work page 1958

  55. [64]

    Winkler,Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems,1sted.,Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol

    R. Winkler,Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems,1sted.,Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 191 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003) pp. XII, 228

    work page 2003

  56. [65]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer–wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Annals of Physics326, 2793–2826 (2011)

    work page 2011

  57. [66]

    A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, t U expansion for the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B37, 9753 (1988)

    work page 1988

  58. [67]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Atom–Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Appli- cations(Wiley, 1992)

    work page 1992

  59. [68]

    Hubac and S

    I. Hubac and S. Wilson, On the use of brillouin-wigner perturbation theory for many-body systems, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.33, 365 (2000)

    work page 2000

  60. [69]

    Papić, E

    Z. Papić, E. M. Stoudenmire, and D. A. Abanin, Many- body localization in disorder-free systems: The impor- tance of finite-size constraints, Annals of Physics362, 714–725 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [70]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems part I: spin chains, SciPost Phys.2, 003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  62. [71]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems. Part II: bosons, fermions and higher spins, SciPost Phys.7, 020 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [72]

    Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifica- tion, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716 (1974)

    H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifica- tion, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716 (1974)

    work page 1974

  64. [73]

    C. M. HURVICH and C.-L. TSAI, Regression and time series model selection in small samples, Biometrika76, 297 (1989), https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article- pdf/76/2/297/737009/76-2-297.pdf

    work page 1989

  65. [74]

    K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson,Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, NY, 2002) hard- cover ISBN 978-0-387-95364-9 (2002); Softcover ISBN 978-1-4419-2973-0 (2010); eBook ISBN 978-0-387-22456- 5 (2007)

    work page 2002

  66. [75]

    Stone, An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and akaike’s criterion, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

    M. Stone, An asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by cross-validation and akaike’s criterion, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)39, 44 (1977)

    work page 1977

  67. [76]

    Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model, The Annals of Statistics6, 461 (1978)

    G. Schwarz, Estimating the dimension of a model, The Annals of Statistics6, 461 (1978)

    work page 1978