pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.04023 · v2 · pith:5GEIPKG6new · submitted 2026-03-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Probing persistent spin textures through nonlinear magnetotransport

Neelanjan Chakraborti , Akash Dey , Snehasish Nandy , Sudeep Kumar Ghosh , Kush Saha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 11:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords persistent spin texturesnonlinear magnetotransportquantum geometryRashba-Dresselhausspin-orbit couplingspin helicesmagnetotransport responsesspin rotation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Persistent spin textures isolate spin-rotation quantum geometry as the sole driver of nonlinear magnetotransport responses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines persistent spin textures, where spins in spin-orbit coupled systems point in a fixed direction regardless of electron momentum due to symmetry. This configuration normally suppresses most quantum-geometric effects that appear in nonlinear transport, leaving only the spin-rotation part of the quantum geometric tensor active. The authors use two model systems to show that the resulting nonlinear magnetic-current and spin-magnetization responses become direction-independent and identical when plotted against chemical potential. These signatures stay intact even when a weak cubic term slightly breaks the exact symmetry. The work therefore turns nonlinear magnetotransport into a practical experimental handle on PST and the underlying spin-rotation geometry.

Core claim

In persistent spin texture systems the conventional and Zeeman quantum-geometric contributions to nonlinear responses are suppressed, so that the spin-rotation quantum geometric tensor alone generates the nonvanishing nonlinear magnetic-current and spin-magnetization responses. These surviving components display identical, direction-independent dependence on chemical potential in both a fine-tuned Rashba-Dresselhaus two-dimensional electron gas and a symmetry-enforced cubic spin-splitting model. The same qualitative features remain visible when a cubic Dresselhaus term is added that breaks exact SU(2) symmetry.

What carries the argument

Spin-rotation quantum geometric tensor, which alone survives in PST and supplies the nonlinear responses while other contributions vanish.

If this is right

  • Nonlinear magnetotransport measurements can identify the presence of PST without relying on spin lifetime data.
  • The direction-independent chemical-potential dependence becomes a clear experimental fingerprint of the isolated spin-rotation geometry.
  • The signatures remain observable even when weak symmetry-breaking terms are present, broadening the range of candidate materials.
  • Spin-magnetization responses provide an additional observable channel that directly tracks the same tensor component.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device designs aiming for long spin coherence could use these transport signatures to verify PST formation in situ.
  • Similar nonlinear probes might distinguish spin-rotation geometry from other geometric contributions in systems lacking full PST symmetry.
  • Extending the analysis to three-dimensional or interface PST candidates would test whether the same suppression mechanism operates beyond two-dimensional models.

Load-bearing premise

The fine-tuned Rashba-Dresselhaus and symmetry-enforced cubic models capture the essential physics of real PST systems so that spin-rotation quantum geometry dominates the nonlinear responses without other effects interfering.

What would settle it

Measure the nonlinear current and magnetization responses in a Rashba-Dresselhaus two-dimensional electron gas tuned exactly to the PST point and check whether all nonvanishing components collapse onto the same curve versus chemical potential regardless of current direction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04023 by Akash Dey, Kush Saha, Neelanjan Chakraborti, Snehasish Nandy, Sudeep Kumar Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Examining a two-dimensional electron gas at the Rashba–Dresselhaus symmetry point and a purely cubic spin-splitting model as representative PST realizations, we find that conventional and Zeeman quantum geomet￾ric contributions vanish, whereas only the SRQGT re￾mains finite and momentum independent. This resid￾ual geometry produces a nonlinear gyrotropic magnetic (NGM) current characterized by complete dir… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Persistent spin textures (PST) are special spin configurations in spin-orbit-coupled systems in which the spin polarization acquires a symmetry-enforced momentum-independent orientation, leading to exceptionally long spin lifetimes and persistent spin helices. Identifying direct experimental probes of PST, however, remains challenging because conventional quantum-geometric responses are strongly suppressed in this regime. Here, we show that PST systems isolate spin-rotation quantum geometry, which manifests through distinctive nonlinear magnetotransport responses. Using both a fine-tuned Rashba-Dresselhaus two-dimensional electron gas and a symmetry-enforced cubic spin-splitting model realizing PST, we demonstrate that PST suppresses conventional and Zeeman quantum-geometric contributions, leaving the spin-rotation quantum geometric tensor as the sole source of nonlinear magnetic-current and spin-magnetization responses. Remarkably, the nonvanishing response components exhibit identical direction-independent behavior as a function of chemical potential, providing a distinctive signature of PST. We further show that, in the Rashba-Dresselhaus two-dimensional electron gas at the PST point, these qualitative signatures remain robust even in the presence of a cubic Dresselhaus term that breaks the exact SU(2) symmetry. Our results establish nonlinear magnetotransport as an experimentally accessible probe of PST and their underlying spin-rotation quantum geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that persistent spin textures (PST) in spin-orbit-coupled systems suppress conventional and Zeeman quantum-geometric contributions to nonlinear magnetotransport, isolating the spin-rotation quantum geometric tensor as the source of distinctive nonlinear magnetic-current and spin-magnetization responses. Using a fine-tuned Rashba-Dresselhaus 2DEG model and a symmetry-enforced cubic spin-splitting Hamiltonian, the authors show that the nonvanishing response components exhibit identical, direction-independent dependence on chemical potential. These signatures remain robust to a weak cubic Dresselhaus perturbation that breaks exact SU(2) symmetry, establishing nonlinear magnetotransport as an experimental probe of PST.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work offers a concrete, experimentally accessible signature for PST systems and their spin-rotation quantum geometry, which are otherwise difficult to probe directly due to suppressed conventional responses. The explicit robustness check against a symmetry-breaking perturbation in the Rashba-Dresselhaus model is a notable strength, as is the demonstration of parameter-free, direction-independent behavior versus chemical potential in both models. This could meaningfully advance spintronics research by linking PST to falsifiable nonlinear transport predictions.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (Rashba-Dresselhaus model at PST point): the suppression of Zeeman quantum-geometric terms is shown analytically for the exact SU(2) case, but the numerical evaluation of the nonlinear conductivity tensor (Eq. (12)) does not include a direct comparison to the magnitude of residual contributions when the cubic Dresselhaus term is added at finite strength; this leaves open whether the spin-rotation term remains dominant for experimentally relevant perturbation sizes.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.1] The definition of the spin-rotation quantum geometric tensor in §2.1 could be expanded with an explicit component-wise expression to aid readers unfamiliar with the decomposition.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4: the color scale for the response functions should include units and a note on the normalization used for the chemical-potential axis.
  3. [§5] A brief discussion of how the predicted direction-independent response would appear in a realistic device geometry (e.g., finite-size effects or contact resistance) would strengthen the experimental implications section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and recommendation of minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Rashba-Dresselhaus model at PST point): the suppression of Zeeman quantum-geometric terms is shown analytically for the exact SU(2) case, but the numerical evaluation of the nonlinear conductivity tensor (Eq. (12)) does not include a direct comparison to the magnitude of residual contributions when the cubic Dresselhaus term is added at finite strength; this leaves open whether the spin-rotation term remains dominant for experimentally relevant perturbation sizes.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript analytically establishes suppression of Zeeman terms under exact SU(2) symmetry and demonstrates that the direction-independent signatures persist under a weak cubic Dresselhaus perturbation. However, we agree that the numerical results for Eq. (12) would benefit from an explicit magnitude comparison between the spin-rotation contribution and any residual terms at finite perturbation strengths. In the revised manuscript we will add such a comparison, selecting representative values of the cubic term to illustrate dominance of the spin-rotation quantum geometric tensor for experimentally plausible perturbation sizes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from model Hamiltonians and symmetry

full rationale

The paper's central results on nonlinear responses in PST systems are obtained by direct computation in explicit model Hamiltonians (fine-tuned Rashba-Dresselhaus 2DEG and symmetry-enforced cubic spin-splitting). Conventional and Zeeman quantum-geometric terms are suppressed by the momentum-independent spin texture enforced in these models, leaving the spin-rotation term as the dominant contribution; this follows from the Hamiltonian structure and symmetry analysis rather than any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. The direction-independent chemical-potential dependence is a computed outcome, not an input. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the derivation chain. The work is self-contained against the chosen models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on symmetry properties of spin-orbit coupled systems and the defining suppression of certain quantum geometric terms in the PST regime; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Symmetry-enforced momentum-independent spin polarization in PST systems
    This is the core property invoked to suppress conventional contributions and isolate spin-rotation geometry.
  • domain assumption Suppression of conventional and Zeeman quantum-geometric contributions within the PST regime
    Invoked to establish spin-rotation tensor as the sole source of the nonlinear responses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5772 in / 1378 out tokens · 64401 ms · 2026-05-22T11:41:23.544531+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Giant Spin Magnetization from Quantum Geometry in Altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Centrosymmetric altermagnets exhibit giant magnetic-field-induced spin magnetization of order 10^{-2} μ_B nm^{-3} at ~10 mT, controlled solely by the spin-rotation quantum metric as the only symmetry-allowed linear qu...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Berry connection thus vanishes iden- tically, enforcing the strict suppression of all conventional and Zeeman geometric quantities

    Since Σ commutes with the Hamiltonian, the eigenstates are diagonal in the Σ basis, yielding the eigenvalues withζ=±1: Eζ(k) = k2 2m + √ 2λζ|k x +k y|.(5) As a direct consequence, the spinor part of the Bloch eigenstates becomes entirely independent of the crystal momentumk. The Berry connection thus vanishes iden- tically, enforcing the strict suppressio...

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Schliemann, Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semiconductor nanostructures, Rev

    J. Schliemann, Colloquium: Persistent spin textures in semiconductor nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Schliemann and D

    J. Schliemann and D. Loss, Anisotropic transport in a two-dimensional electron gas in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B68, 165311 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    B. A. Bernevig, J. Orenstein, and S.-C. Zhang, Exact su(2) symmetry and persistent spin helix in a spin-orbit coupled system, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 236601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    H. J. Zhao, H. Nakamura, R. Arras, C. Paillard, P. Chen, J. Gosteau, X. Li, Y. Yang, and L. Bellaiche, Purely cubic spin splittings with persistent spin textures, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 216405 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    L. L. Tao and E. Y. Tsymbal, Persistent spin texture enforced by symmetry, Nature Communications9, 2763 6 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Kilic, S

    B. Kilic, S. Alvarruiz, E. Barts, B. van Dijk, P. Barone, and J. S lawi´ nska, Universal symmetry-protected persis- tent spin textures in noncentrosymmetric crystals, Na- ture Communications16, 7999 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Communications in Math- ematical Physics76, 289 (1980)

    work page 1980

  9. [9]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society A392, 45 (1984)

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    Mitscherling, Longitudinal and anomalous hall conduc- tivity of a general two-band model, Phys

    J. Mitscherling, Longitudinal and anomalous hall conduc- tivity of a general two-band model, Phys. Rev. B102, 165151 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Avdoshkin, J

    A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, Multi- state geometry of shift current and polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 066901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Antebi, J

    O. Antebi, J. Mitscherling, and T. Holder, Drude weight of an interacting flat-band metal, Phys. Rev. B110, L241111 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Mitscherling and T

    J. Mitscherling and T. Holder, Bound on resistivity in flat-band materials due to the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B105, 085154 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Postlewaite, A

    A. Postlewaite, A. Raj, S. Chaudhary, and G. A. Fi- ete, Quantum geometry and nonlinear optical responses in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B110, 245122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Quantum Geometric Origin of the Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect

    Y. Ulrich, J. Mitscherling, L. Classen, and A. P. Schny- der, Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear hall effect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17386 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Dey, Nonlinear hall responses in tunable nodal dirac semimetals (2025), arXiv:2511.20214 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    A. Dey, Nonlinear hall responses in tunable nodal dirac semimetals (2025), arXiv:2511.20214 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Symmetry-driven Intrinsic Nonlinear Pure Spin Hall Effect

    S. Sarkar, S. Das, and A. Agarwal, Symmetry- driven intrinsic nonlinear pure spin hall effect (2025), arXiv:2502.18226 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Band geometry, berry curvature and su- perfluid weight, Physical Review B95, 024515 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Xiang, H

    L. Xiang, H. Jin, and J. Wang, Spin transport revealed by spin quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 146303 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Quantum geometric map of magnetotransport

    L. Xiang, J. Jia, F. Xu, and J. Wang, Classification of electromagnetic responses by quantum geometry (2025), arXiv:2510.02661 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Iguchi, H

    J. Iguchi, H. Watanabe, Y. Murakami, T. Nomoto, and R. Arita, Bulk photovoltaic effect in antiferromagnet: Role of collective spin dynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, 064407 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Hattori, H

    K. Hattori, H. Watanabe, and R. Arita, Nonlinear hall effect driven by spin-charge-coupled motive force, Phys. Rev. B111, 174416 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Xiang, J

    L. Xiang, J. Jia, F. Xu, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Intrin- sic gyrotropic magnetic current from zeeman quantum geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 116301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Chakraborti, S

    N. Chakraborti, S. K. Ghosh, and S. Nandy, Zeeman quantum geometry as a probe of unconventional mag- netism (2025), arXiv:2508.14745 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  27. [27]

    Jiang, T

    Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Revealing quantum geometry in nonlinear quantum materials, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 076502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Nature Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Chakraborti, S

    N. Chakraborti, S. Nandy, and S. K. Ghosh, Gyrotropic fingerprints of magnetic topological insulator-unconventional magnet interfaces (2025), arXiv:2512.18621 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    J. Jia, L. Xiang, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Nonlinear magne- toelectric edelstein effect (2025), arXiv:2507.23415 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Chakraborti, S

    N. Chakraborti, S. Nandy, and S. K. Ghosh, Intrinsic nonlinear gyrotropic magnetic effect governed by spin- rotation quantum geometry (2026), arXiv:2601.22019 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Cartoix` a, L.-W

    X. Cartoix` a, L.-W. Wang, D.-Y. Ting, and Y.-C. Chang, Higher-order contributions to rashba and dresselhaus ef- fects, Phys. Rev. B73, 205341 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C17, 6039 (1984)

    work page 1984

  35. [35]

    Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys

    G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    work page 1955

  36. [36]

    Winkler,Spin–Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems(Springer, 2003)

    R. Winkler,Spin–Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems(Springer, 2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    A. Dey, A. K. Nandy, and K. Saha, Current-induced spin polarisation in rashba–dresselhaus systems under differ- ent point groups, New Journal of Physics27, 013024 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Schliemann, J

    J. Schliemann, J. C. Egues, and D. Loss, Nonballistic spin-field-effect transistor, Physical Review Letters90, 146801 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    S. D. Ganichev, V. V. Bel’kov, P. Schneider, E. L. Ivchenko, S. A. Tarasenko, W. Wegscheider, D. Weiss, and W. Prettl, Spin-galvanic effect, Physical Review Let- ters90, 136801 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gos- sard, W. Wiegmann, T. H. Wood, and C. A. Burrus, Band-edge electroabsorption in quantum well structures: The quantum-confined stark effect, Physical Review Let- ters53, 2173 (1984)

    work page 1984

  41. [41]

    H. Ye, C. Hu, G. Wang, H. Zhao, H. Tian, W. Wang, and B. Liu, Anisotropic in-plane spin splitting in an asymmet- ric (001) gaas/algaas quantum well, Nanoscale Research Letters6, 520 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    R. R. Binder, B. B. Gu, and N. H. Kwong, Quantum-confined strain gradient effect in semiconduc- tor nanomembranes, Physical Review B90, 195208 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    P. S. Grigoryev, A. S. Kurdyubov, M. S. Kuznetsova, Y. P. Efimov, S. A. Eliseev, V. V. Petrov, V. A. Lovtcius, P. Y. Shapochkin, and I. V. Ignatiev, Excitons in asym- metric quantum wells, arXiv:1602.03720 (2016), arXiv preprint, 1602.03720

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Y.-J. Lin, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, and I. B. Spielman, Spin– orbit-coupled bose–einstein condensates, Nature471, 83 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    I. B. Spielman, Raman-induced spin-orbit coupling in ultracold fermi gases, Physical Review A79, 063613 (2009). 7

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    J. D. Koralek, C. P. Weber, J. Orenstein, B. A. Bernevig, S.-C. Zhang, S. Mack, and D. D. Awschalom, Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells, Nature458, 610 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Gritsev and A

    V. Gritsev and A. Polkovnikov, Nonequilibrium dynam- ics of quantum systems: Order parameter oscillations and quantum geometry, PNAS109, 6457 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Physics Reports697, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Harvey-Collard, B

    P. Harvey-Collard, B. D’Anjou, M. Rudolph, N. T. Ja- cobson, J. Dominguez, G. A. Ten Eyck, J. R. Wendt, T. Pluym, M. P. Lilly, W. A. Coish, M. Pioro-Ladri` ere, and M. S. Carroll, High-fidelity single-shot readout for a spin qubit via an enhanced latching mechanism, Phys. Rev. X8, 021046 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Kiyama, D

    H. Kiyama, D. van Hien, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, and A. Oiwa, High-fidelity spin readout via the double latch- ing mechanism, npj Quantum Information10, 95 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    N. F. Ramsey, A molecular beam resonance method with separated oscillating fields, Physical Review78, 695 (1950)

    work page 1950

  52. [52]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measure- ment of the zak phase in topological bloch bands, Nature Physics9, 795 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Godfrin, R

    C. Godfrin, R. Ballou, E. Bonet, M. Ruben, S. Kly- atskaya, W. Wernsdorfer, and F. Balestro, Generalized ramsey interferometry explored with a single nuclear spin qudit, npj Quantum Information4, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    D. Hu, L. Niu, S. Jin, X. Chen, G. Dong, J. Schmied- mayer, and X. Zhou, Ramsey interferometry with trapped motional quantum states, Communications Physics1, 29 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Tan, D.-W

    X. Tan, D.-W. Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Chu, Y.-Q. Zhu, D. Li, X. Yang, S. Song, Z. Han, Z. Li, Y. Dong, H.-F. Yu, H. Yan, S.-L. Zhu, and Y. Yu, Experimental measure- ment of the quantum metric tensor and related topologi- cal phase transition with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 210401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    M. Yu, P. Yang, M. Gong, Q. Cao, Q. Lu, H. Liu, S. Zhang, M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, T. Ozawa, N. Gold- man, and J. Cai, Experimental measurement of the quan- tum geometric tensor using coupled qubits in diamond, National Science Review7, 254 (2019)

    work page 2019