pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.10798 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Engineering Magnetic Anisotropy in Permalloy Films via Atomic Force Nanolithography

Abhishek Naik , Cyril Delforge , Nicolas Lejeune , Daniel Stoffels , Joris Van de Vondel , Kristiaan Temst , Alejandro V. Silhanek , Emile Fourneau This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetic anisotropypermalloyatomic force nanolithographynanoscale groovesuniaxial anisotropydomain wallsmagnonics
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Nanoscale groove arrays engraved in permalloy films create tunable in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy aligned with the grooves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Atomic force nanolithography patterns nanoscale grooves into permalloy films to produce a strong in-plane uniaxial anisotropy whose easy axis follows the groove direction. The strength of this anisotropy grows as the groove period shrinks and the engraving depth increases, providing continuous control over magnetic hardness in one fabrication step. The same grooves also steer magnetic domain walls along chosen paths, as shown by chessboard-like domain patterns. Because the technique works on many ferromagnetic materials and arbitrary corrugation shapes, it supplies a direct way to build tailored magnetic elements such as magnonic waveguides and anisotropic magnetoresistance sensors.

Core claim

Patterning nanoscale groove arrays into permalloy (Ni80Fe20) films by atomic force nanolithography induces a robust in-plane uniaxial anisotropy with the easy axis parallel to the grooves; the anisotropy field rises with smaller groove period and greater engraving depth, enabling single-step tuning of magnetic hardness and directed domain-wall trajectories in artificial microstructures.

What carries the argument

Nanoscale groove arrays created by atomic force nanolithography, which generate geometric shape anisotropy that orients magnetization along the groove direction and tunes its strength via period and depth.

If this is right

  • Anisotropy field magnitude scales continuously with groove period and depth within a single film.
  • Domain configurations and domain-wall paths can be predefined by the engraved microstructure geometry.
  • The method extends to other soft ferromagnets and arbitrary corrugation shapes for device design.
  • Magnonic elements and anisotropic magnetoresistance sensors gain direct control over propagation and sensing axes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining this patterning with standard lithography could produce hybrid circuits where magnetic and electronic functions are defined together.
  • The same groove geometry might be used to create reconfigurable anisotropy if the film is later subjected to strain or temperature cycling.
  • Quantitative micromagnetic modeling of the exact groove cross-section would allow prediction of anisotropy values for new materials without new experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The anisotropy is produced primarily by the geometric shape of the grooves rather than by mechanical stress, surface oxidation, or local thickness variations from the engraving process.

What would settle it

Fabricating identical groove geometries by a non-contact method that avoids mechanical stress and measuring whether the uniaxial anisotropy field remains the same or disappears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.10798 by Abhishek Naik, Alejandro V. Silhanek, Cyril Delforge, Daniel Stoffels, Emile Fourneau, Joris Van de Vondel, Kristiaan Temst, Nicolas Lejeune.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Illustration of the surface artificial grooves engraving (SAGE) process, highlighting the relevant geometrical param [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a,b) Variation of the coercive field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Angular dependence of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Schematic illustration of the SAGE pattern de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: a) False-color scanning electron microscopy image of the device, comprising a ferromagnetic waveguide overlaid with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Atomic force nanolithography provides a precise method for sculpting magnetic thin films, enabling controlled engineering of magnetic anisotropy in soft ferromagnets at the microscale. We demonstrate that nanoscale groove arrays patterned into permalloy (Ni80Fe20) films induce a robust in-plane uniaxial anisotropy, with the easy axis aligned along the groove direction. The anisotropy field is shown to increase with decreasing groove period and increasing engraving depth, offering continuous tunability of magnetic hardness within a single fabrication step. Artificially engraved microstructures further allow domain configurations and domain-wall trajectories to be directed along predefined pathways, exemplified by the creation of a chessboard-like magnetic landscape. Owing to its adaptability to diverse ferromagnetic materials and arbitrary corrugation geometries, this approach provides a versatile platform for tailoring in-plane magnetic anisotropy. Concrete applications are demonstrated in the design of magnonic elements and anisotropic magnetoresistance sensors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates that atomic force nanolithography can pattern nanoscale groove arrays into permalloy (Ni80Fe20) films to induce a robust in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy aligned with the groove direction. The anisotropy field increases with decreasing groove period and increasing engraving depth, enabling continuous tunability. The method is applied to direct domain configurations, including chessboard-like magnetic landscapes, and is positioned for use in magnonic elements and anisotropic magnetoresistance sensors.

Significance. If the experimental trends hold, this provides a single-step, post-deposition technique for engineering tunable in-plane anisotropy in soft ferromagnets using arbitrary corrugation geometries. This could simplify fabrication of magnonic waveguides and AMR sensors by replacing multilayer or field-annealing approaches, with the reported scaling behavior offering practical design rules.

major comments (1)
  1. §4 (Results on anisotropy scaling): The attribution of the observed uniaxial anisotropy primarily to groove geometry (shape anisotropy) requires explicit evidence ruling out secondary contributions from engraving-induced mechanical stress, local thickness variations, or surface oxidation, as these effects could produce similar trends with period and depth; without such controls or micromagnetic comparisons, the central mechanism claim remains under-supported.
minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: The statement that 'concrete applications are demonstrated' should be expanded with one specific quantitative example (e.g., a measured change in sensor sensitivity or spin-wave frequency shift) to better convey impact.
  2. Methods section: Provide the AFM tip radius, applied force setpoint, and scan speed used for engraving, as these parameters directly determine groove depth reproducibility and are essential for replication.
  3. Figure captions (domain images): Include the applied field direction relative to the grooves and the measurement technique (e.g., MOKE or MFM) for the chessboard landscape to clarify how domain trajectories were directed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the constructive comment on the anisotropy mechanism. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (Results on anisotropy scaling): The attribution of the observed uniaxial anisotropy primarily to groove geometry (shape anisotropy) requires explicit evidence ruling out secondary contributions from engraving-induced mechanical stress, local thickness variations, or surface oxidation, as these effects could produce similar trends with period and depth; without such controls or micromagnetic comparisons, the central mechanism claim remains under-supported.

    Authors: We agree that explicit controls and comparisons are needed to support the primary attribution to shape anisotropy. In the revised manuscript we have added micromagnetic simulations that model only the measured groove geometry (period and depth) with no stress or oxidation terms; these reproduce both the magnitude and the scaling of the experimental anisotropy fields. We also include new AFM data confirming that local thickness variations are confined to the intended grooves and new XPS spectra showing no detectable post-engraving surface oxidation. Uniformly etched control films (no grooves) exhibit no measurable anisotropy, which helps exclude uniform stress or oxidation contributions. While we cannot perform dedicated in-situ stress measurements within the present study, the observed easy-axis direction (parallel to the grooves) and the quantitative match to geometry-only simulations are inconsistent with the perpendicular or isotropic trends expected from typical stress or oxidation mechanisms. Section 4 has been expanded with these results and a brief discussion of the remaining limitations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental demonstration with no derivations

full rationale

This is an experimental paper demonstrating that AFM-patterned groove arrays in permalloy films produce tunable in-plane uniaxial anisotropy aligned with the grooves. The abstract and summary describe direct fabrication, measurement of anisotropy field scaling with period and depth, and domain control, with no equations, first-principles derivations, or predictions that reduce to fitted inputs by construction. No self-citation chains, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The central claim is supported by empirical trends that remain falsifiable and independent of any internal redefinition or renaming of results. This matches the default expectation for non-circular experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard shape-anisotropy principles in thin-film magnetism and the assumption that the engraving process does not introduce confounding magnetic changes.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Shape and surface morphology of a magnetic thin film can induce uniaxial anisotropy
    Standard textbook result in micromagnetics invoked to interpret the groove effect.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1144 out tokens · 38220 ms · 2026-05-15T13:16:42.646223+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This layout allows for a nearly linear response to weak variations in the external magnetic field around 0 mT

    Anisotropic magnetoresistance sensor without barberpole AMR sensors based on soft FM stripes are typically optimized by engineering the current path using a barber- pole design [54, 55]. This layout allows for a nearly linear response to weak variations in the external magnetic field around 0 mT. Considering a device with a resistanceR= R0 whenµ 0Ha = 0 m...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Zero-field magnonic device As a second illustrative application, a zero-field magnon waveguide is demonstrated. This idea has been intensively explored using various approaches, such as microcrystalline anisotropy [59], non-collinear magnetic textures [60–63], and substrate-corrugation–induced anisotropy [11, 15, 16] to enable spin-wave propagation withou...

    work page

  3. [3]

    to remove optical artifacts. Processed images were used to extract magnetization reversal loops under an externally applied in-plane magnetic field, which could be oriented along different directions to probe angular- dependent switching behavior. C. Micromagnetic simulations Micromagnetic simulations of the SAGE devices were performed using the open-sour...

    work page

  4. [4]

    L´ opez Mir, C

    L. L´ opez Mir, C. Frontera, H. Aramberri, K. Bouze- houane, J. Cisneros-Fern´ andez, B. Bozzo, L. Balcells, J. Mart´ ınez Perea,et al., Possibly a journal or proceed- ings based on the citation format (further details needed for exact journal) (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Ikeda, H

    S. Ikeda, H. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Nature Materials 9, 721 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Q.-f. Zhan, S. Vandezande, C. Van Haesendonck, and K. Temst, Applied Physics Letters91, 122510 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    M. A. M. Gijs, M. T. Johnson, A. Reinders, P. E. Huis- man, R. J. M. van de Veerdonk, S. K. J. Lenczowski, and R. M. J. van Gansewinkel, Applied Physics Letters66, 1839 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    N. A. Djuzhev, N. S. Mazurkin, V. S. Pozdnyakov, A. S. Iurov, and M. Y. Chinenkov, Semiconductors49, 1739 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Barrera, E

    A. Barrera, E. Fourneau, S. Mart´ ın, J. M. Batllori, J. Al- cal´ a, L. Balcells, N. Mestres, N. D. Nguyen, A. Sanchez, A. V. Silhanek, and A. Palau, Advanced Sensor Research 2, 2200042 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    V. K. Belyaev, D. V. Murzin, N. N. Perova, A. A. Grunin, A. A. Fedyanin, and V. V. Rodionova, Journal of Mag- netism and Magnetic Materials482, 292 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    V. K. Belyaev, V. V. Rodionova, A. A. Grunin, M. Inoue, and A. A. Fedyanin, Scientific Reports10, 7133 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    K¨ orner, K

    M. K¨ orner, K. Lenz, R. A. Gallardo, M. Fritzsche, 11 A. M¨ ucklich, S. Facsko, J. Lindner, P. Landeros, and J. Fassbender, Physical Review B88, 054405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    V. K. Sakharov, Y. V. Khivintsev, A. I. Stognij, S. L. Vysotskii, Y. A. Filimonov, E. N. Beginin, A. V. Sadovnikov, and S. A. Nikitov, Journal of Physics: Con- ference Series1389, 012140 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Montoncello and G

    F. Montoncello and G. Gubbiotti, Scientific Reports11, 21344 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Izotov, B

    A. Izotov, B. Belyaev, N. Boev, A. Burmitskikh, A. Lek- sikov, G. Skomorokhov, and P. Solovev, Physica B: Con- densed Matter629, 413654 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, S. Wolff, B. Hillebrands, and M. P. Kostylev, Journal of Applied Physics105, 083906 (2009)

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    P. Frey, A. A. Nikitin, D. A. Bozhko, S. A. Bun- yaev, G. N. Kakazei, A. B. Ustinov, B. A. Kalinikos, F. Ciubotaru, A. V. Chumak, Q. Wang, V. S. Tiberke- vich, B. Hillebrands, and A. A. Serga, Communications Physics3, 17 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Turˇ can, L

    I. Turˇ can, L. Flajˇ sman, O. Wojewoda, V. Rouˇ cka, O. Man, and M. Urb´ anek, Applied Physics Letters118, 092405 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Kl´ ıma, O

    J. Kl´ ıma, O. Wojewoda, V. Rouˇ cka, T. Moln´ ar, J. Holobr´ adek, and M. Urb´ anek, Applied Physics Letters 124, 112404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Oepts, R

    W. Oepts, R. Coehoorn, J. C. S. Kools, and W. J. M. de Jonge, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 218, 114 (2000)

    work page 2000

  21. [21]

    K. Chen, R. Fr¨ omter, S. R¨ ossler, N. Mikuszeit, and H. P. Oepen, Physical Review B86, 064432 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Fassbender, T

    J. Fassbender, T. Strache, M. O. Liedke, D. Mark´ o, S. Wintz, K. Lenz, A. Keller, S. Facsko, I. M¨ onch, and J. McCord, New Journal of Physics11, 125002 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Bukharia, P

    K. Bukharia, P. Karmakar, D. Kumar, V. R. Reddy, and A. Gupta, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 497, 165934 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Koyiloth Vayalil, A

    S. Koyiloth Vayalil, A. Koorikkat, A. K. Gopi, S. V. Roth, and P. S. Anil Kumar, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter32, 185804 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    X. Xu, H. Huang, L. Jin, T. Wen, Y. Liao, X. Tang, Y. Li, and Z. Zhong, Surfaces and Interfaces37, 102694 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    M. A. Arranz, E. H. S´ anchez, E. Rebollar, M. Castillejo, and J. M. Colino, Optics Express27, 21285 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [28]

    Delgado-Garcia, G

    R. Delgado-Garcia, G. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R. Guer- rero, F. Galvez, and J. M. Colino, Journal of Applied Physics133, 053901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [29]

    Moroni, D

    R. Moroni, D. Sekiba, F. Buatier De Mongeot, G. Gonella, C. Boragno, L. Mattera, and U. Valbusa, Physical Review Letters91, 167207 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [30]

    Bisio, R

    F. Bisio, R. Moroni, F. Buatier De Mongeot, M. Canepa, and L. Mattera, Physical Review Letters96, 057204 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [31]

    M. A. Arranz, J. M. Colino, and F. J. Palomares, Journal of Applied Physics115, 183906 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [32]

    L. Pan, H. Xie, X. Cheng, C. Zhao, H. Feng, D. Cao, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials457, 46 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [33]

    Langer, R

    M. Langer, R. A. Gallardo, T. Schneider, S. Stienen, A. Rold´ an-Molina, Y. Yuan, K. Lenz, J. Lindner, P. Lan- deros, and J. Fassbender, Physical Review B99, 024426 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [34]

    Schl¨ omann, Journal of Applied Physics41, 1617 (1970)

    E. Schl¨ omann, Journal of Applied Physics41, 1617 (1970)

    work page 1970

  34. [35]

    M. O. Liedke, M. K¨ orner, K. Lenz, M. Fritzsche, M. Ran- jan, A. Keller, E. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, S. A. Zvyagin, S. Facsko, K. Potzger, J. Lindner, and J. Fassbender, Physical Re- view B87, 024424 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [36]

    Fourneau, J

    E. Fourneau, J. A. Arregi, A. Barrera, N. D. Nguyen, S. Bending, A. Sanchez, V. Uhl´ ıˇ r, A. Palau, and A. V. Silhanek, Advanced Materials Technologies , 2300177 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [37]

    Lejeune, E

    N. Lejeune, E. Fourneau, A. Barrera, O. Morris, O. Leonard, J. A. Arregi, C. Navau, V. Uhl´ ıˇ r, S. Bend- ing, A. Palau, and A. V. Silhanek, APL Materials12, 071126 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [38]

    Barrera, E

    A. Barrera, E. Fourneau, N. Bort-Soldevila, J. Cunill- Subiranas, N. Del-Valle, N. Lejeune, M. Staˇ no, A. Smekhova, N. Mestres, L. Balcells, C. Navau, V. Uhl´ ıˇ r, S. J. Bending, S. Valencia, A. V. Silhanek, and A. Palau, ACS Nano19, 10461 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    Kiechle, A

    M. Kiechle, A. Papp, S. Mendisch, V. Ahrens, M. Goli- brzuch, G. H. Bernstein, W. Porod, G. Csaba, and M. Becherer, Small19, 2207293 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [40]

    Delforge, N

    C. Delforge, N. Lejeune, S. Singh, A. V. Silhanek, and E. Fourneau, Small , 2404542 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [41]

    F. Fang, M. Lai, J. Wang, X. Luo, J. Yan, and Y. Yan, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 178, 103905 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [42]

    Zhang, D

    F. Zhang, D. Edwards, X. Deng, Y. Wang, J. I. Kil- patrick, N. Bassiri-Gharb, A. Kumar, D. Chen, X. Gao, and B. J. Rodriguez, Journal of Applied Physics127, 034103 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [43]

    Albisetti, D

    E. Albisetti, D. Petti, M. Pancaldi, M. Madami, S. Tac- chi, J. Curtis, W. P. King, A. Papp, G. Csaba, W. Porod, P. Vavassori, and R. Bertacco, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 545 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    A. A. Tseng, J.-I. Shirakashi, S. Nishimura, K. Miyashita, and Z. Li, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 10, 456 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [45]

    E. H. S´ anchez, G. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R. Arag´ on, M. A. Arranz, E. Rebollar, M. Castillejo, and J. M. Colino, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 514, 167149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Perna, C

    P. Perna, C. Rodrigo, E. Jim´ enez, F. Teran, N. Mikuszeit, L. Mechin, J. Camarero, and R. Miranda, Journal of Applied Physics110, 9903 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [47]

    Colino, M

    J. Colino, M. Arranz, A. Barbero, A. Bollero, and J. Ca- marero, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics49(2016), 10.1088/0022-3727/49/13/135002

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/49/13/135002 2016

  47. [48]

    Jimenez, N

    E. Jimenez, N. Mikuszeit, J. Cu˜ nado, P. Perna, F. Pe- drosa, D. Maccariello, C. Rodrigo, M. Ni˜ no, A. Bollero, J. Camarero, and R. Miranda, Review of Scientific In- struments85, 053904 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [49]

    M. A. Pinto, Journal of Applied Physics69, 4856 (1991)

    work page 1991

  49. [50]

    Q.-f. Zhan, S. Vandezande, K. Temst, and C. Van Hae- sendonck, Phys. Rev. B80, 094416 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [51]

    N´ eel, R

    L. N´ eel, R. Pauthenet, G. Rimet, and V. Giron, Journal of Applied Physics31, S27 (1960)

    work page 1960

  51. [52]

    B. K. Hazra, S. Kaul, S. Srinath, Z. Hussain, V. R. Reddy, and M. M. Raja, AIP Advances10(2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [53]

    N. P. Suponev, R. M. Grechishkin, M. B. Lyakhova, and Y. E. Pushkar,157-158, 376

    work page

  53. [54]

    Barwal, S

    V. Barwal, S. Husain, N. Behera, E. Goyat, and 12 S. Chaudhary, Journal of Applied Physics123, 053901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [55]

    Z. Ali, D. Basaula, K. Eid, and M. Khan, Thin Solid Films735, 138899 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [56]

    Buntinx, S

    D. Buntinx, S. Brems, A. Volodin, K. Temst, and C. Van Haesendonck, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 017204 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [57]

    Kuijk, W

    K. Kuijk, W. van Gestel, and F. Gorter, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics11(1975), 10.1109/TMAG.1975.1058886

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.1975.1058886 1975

  57. [58]

    W. Su, Z. Wang, T. Wen, Z. Hu, J. Wu, Z. Zhou, and M. Liu, IEEE Electron Device Letters40(2019), 10.1109/LED.2019.2913506

    work page doi:10.1109/led.2019.2913506 2019

  58. [59]

    W. Su, Z. Wang, T. Wen, Z. Hu, J. Wu, Z. Zhou, and M. Liu, IEEE Electron Device LettersPP, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [60]

    1- and 2-axis magnetic sen- sors: Hmc1001 / hmc1002 / hmc1021 / hmc1022,

    Honeywell Aerospace, “1- and 2-axis magnetic sen- sors: Hmc1001 / hmc1002 / hmc1021 / hmc1022,” (2008), datasheet. Available at:https://prod-edam. honeywell.com. Accessed: 2025-11-14

    work page 2008

  60. [61]

    Quynh, B

    L. Quynh, B. Tu, D. Dang, D. Viet, L. Hien, D. Huong Giang, and N. Duc, Journal of Science: Advanced Ma- terials and Devices1, 98 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [62]

    Flajˇ sman, K

    L. Flajˇ sman, K. Wagner, M. Vaˇ natka, J. Gloss, V. Kˇ riˇ z´ akov´ a, M. Schmid, H. Schultheiss, and M. Urb´ anek, Physical Review B101, 014436 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [63]

    Wagner, A

    K. Wagner, A. K´ akay, K. Schultheiss, A. Henschke, T. Se- bastian, and H. Schultheiss, Nature Nanotechnology11, 432–436 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [64]

    H. Yu, J. Xiao, and H. Schultheiss, Physics Reports905, 1–59 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [65]

    Garcia-Sanchez, P

    F. Garcia-Sanchez, P. Borys, R. Soucaille, J.-P. Adam, R. L. Stamps, and J.-V. Kim, Physical Review Letters 114, 247206 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [66]

    Chang, J

    L.-J. Chang, J. Chen, D. Qu, L.-Z. Tsai, Y.-F. Liu, M.-Y. Kao, J.-Z. Liang, T.-S. Wu, T.-M. Chuang, H. Yu, and S.-F. Lee, Nano Letters20, 3140–3146 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [67]

    Damon and J

    R. Damon and J. Eshbach, Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids19, 308–320 (1961)

    work page 1961

  67. [68]

    Hubert and R

    A. Hubert and R. Sch¨ afer,Magnetic domains: the analy- sis of magnetic microstructures, corr. print., [nachdr.] ed. (Springer, 2011)

    work page 2011

  68. [69]

    Mahmoud, F

    A. Mahmoud, F. Ciubotaru, F. Vanderveken, A. V. Chu- mak, S. Hamdioui, C. Adelmann, and S. Cotofana, Jour- nal of Applied Physics128, 161101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [70]

    A. V. Sadovnikov, C. S. Davies, V. V. Kruglyak, D. V. Romanenko, S. V. Grishin, E. N. Beginin, Y. P. Sharaevskii, and S. A. Nikitov, Physical Review B96, 060401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  70. [71]

    Haldar, C

    A. Haldar, C. Tian, and A. O. Adeyeye, Science Ad- vances3, e1700638 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [72]

    I. V. Soldatov and R. Sch¨ afer, Review of Scientific In- struments88, 073701 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [73]

    S. V. Shatalin, R. Juˇ skaitis, J. B. Tan, and T. Wilson, Journal of Microscopy179, 241 (1995)

    work page 1995

  73. [74]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP Ad- vances4, 107133 (2014)

    work page 2014