Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Axions at the meV Crossroads: Theory, Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Experiments

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The meV mass window for axions has matured from a theoretical guess into a coordinated programme of independent experiments that can cross-validate one another, and the coming decade should decisively test the meV QCD axion.

desk verdict A solid, self-aware roadmap for meV axions, worth refereeing; just don't mistake its theory pillar for a settled preference. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.18167 v2 pith:F66UFQ6R submitted 2026-03-18 hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-exhep-th

Michele Cicoli , Francesco D'Eramo , Luca Di Luzio , Damiano F. G. Fiorillo , Maurizio Giannotti , Alicia Gomez , Diego Guadagnoli , Mathieu Kaltschmidt
show 13 more authors
Bradley J. Kavanagh Alessandro Lella Giuseppe Lucente David J. E. Marsh Federico Mescia Alessandro Mirizzi Javier Redondo Nicole Righi Jaime Ruz Ken'ichi Saikawa Elisa Todarello Edoardo Vitagliano Su-Yang Xu
This is my paper
classification hep-phastro-ph.HEhep-exhep-th PACS 14.80.Va95.35.+d97.60.Bw
keywords axionsmeVmassfrontierQCDaxiondarkmatterradiationhelioscopeshaloscopesquasiparticles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that axions with masses around a few meV are the most accessible near-term target in the search for physics beyond the Standard Model. It assembles four independent lines of evidence—string-theory constructions and the Peccei-Quinn quality problem favouring decay constants around 5×10⁹ GeV, cosmological production channels making meV axions viable dark matter or dark radiation, astrophysical bounds currently sitting at 10–20 meV, and a new generation of experiments—and shows they all point to the same mass range. If the review is right, the coming decade will either discover the QCD axion in the meV window or exclude it, with enough overlap among probes that any signal can be cross-checked. The claim matters because it turns an abstract particle-physics question into a concrete, testable research programme.

What carries the argument

The central object is the meV-scale QCD axion, with mass in the 1–10 meV range and decay constant near 5×10⁹ GeV. The argument is carried by convergence among independent probes: helioscopes like CAST and BabyIAXO (solar axion conversion in a magnetized bore), haloscopes like CADEx (resonant cavity readout of dark-matter axions near 0.4 meV), axion quasiparticles in topological antiferromagnets (a collective magnon oscillation of the material's magnetoelectric coupling, observed in MnBi₂Te₄ at 0.18 meV), supernova axion detection via gamma-ray conversion in progenitor magnetic fields and via axion absorption producing pions in water Cherenkov detectors, and the predicted contribution to ΔNef

What would settle it

A coordinated null result across all meV probes: if BabyIAXO's gas-phase run and CADEx together exclude the QCD axion band in the 0.1–10 meV range, the next galactic supernova within ~2 kpc produces neither a 100 MeV gamma-ray burst nor pion-initiated Cherenkov events in Hyper-Kamiokande, and CMB-S4 finds no ΔNeff, then the meV QCD axion hypothesis would be observationally excluded. A null in any single channel would not settle it, but the combined absence of signals across helioscopes, haloscopes, quasiparticle detectors, Cherenkov searches, and cosmology would.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim is that the meV frontier has matured from a theoretically motivated target into a well-defined experimental programme. Multiple independent approaches—helioscopes searching for solar axions, haloscopes and axion-quasiparticle detectors searching for dark matter, precision cosmology probing thermal relics, and astrophysical observations of supernovae and neutron stars—now probe overlapping regions of parameter space. This overlap offers the prospect of robust, cross-validated discovery or exclusion: if one channel sees a signal, the others can confirm its axion interpretation and measure its mass, couplings, and cosmological abundance. The coming decade, with BabyIA

Load-bearing premise

The argument leans on the premise that meV-scale QCD axions are a generic, theoretically well-motivated outcome of ultraviolet completions. The review itself flags a severe challenge: the closed-string construction needs extra dimensions large enough that a companion scalar field (the volume modulus) decays after Big Bang nucleosynthesis, which forces either smaller extra dimensions—pushing the axion's interaction scale out of the meV window—or a non-generic late-time dilutio

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • BabyIAXO's gas-phase scan and CADEx will cover parts of the QCD axion band in the meV range, making the window an experimentally accessible target rather than a purely theoretical one.
  • A galactic supernova within about 2 kpc would produce a detectable 100 MeV gamma-ray burst from axion–photon conversion, and Hyper-Kamiokande would see up to a few hundred pion-induced Cherenkov events; a more distant supernova would not.
  • Future CMB surveys, including the Simons Observatory and CMB-S4, will probe the thermal axion contribution to dark radiation in exactly the decay-constant range that corresponds to meV masses, complementing supernova bounds.
  • The axion-quasiparticle resonance in MnBi₂Te₄ is tunable by an external magnetic field across roughly 0.7–7 meV, offering a volume-independent resonant detection channel for dark-matter axions.
  • A coordinated null result across helioscopes, haloscopes, quasiparticle detectors, Cherenkov searches, and CMB observations would exclude the meV QCD axion as the solution to the strong CP problem, or push it into tuned or non-generic scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Weighting the paper's own caveats, the theoretical pillar is the weakest leg: the closed-string route requires a Calabi-Yau volume near 10¹⁵, which makes the volume modulus decay after BBN, forcing either a smaller volume (pushing f_QCD to 10¹³–10¹⁶ GeV, outside the meV window) or a non-generic dilution mechanism. The open-string route avoids this but relies on control of the effective field theor
  • A future discovery of a meV axion would therefore be evidence either for open-string constructions or for non-generic volume stabilization in closed-string models, making the low-energy measurement a diagnostic of string compactification details.
  • The axion-quasiparticle discovery in MnBi₂Te₄ is likely the first of a material class: any topological antiferromagnet with comparable anisotropy fields should host meV-scale axion quasiparticles, turning the meV range into a tunable condensed-matter laboratory for axion electrodynamics.
  • A testable extension of the supernova program: full-sky gamma-ray coverage during the next galactic supernova, especially of compact Type Ibc progenitors, could measure both axion mass and coupling from the burst spectrum, and its absence would tighten bounds without relying on uncertain progenitor magnetic fields.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a comprehensive review of the physics case for axions in the meV mass range. It covers field-theoretic Peccei-Quinn quality arguments and string-theory constructions (closed-string and open-string axions), cosmological roles as cold dark matter and dark radiation, astrophysical probes from supernovae and neutron stars, and experimental strategies including helioscopes, haloscopes, and the recently reported condensed-matter axion quasiparticle in MnBi2Te4. The paper's central claim is that the meV window has matured from a theoretically motivated target into a coherent, cross-validated experimental programme, with overlapping sensitivity from several independent directions.

Significance. If the assessment is correct, the review is a valuable synthesis for the axion community. Its strengths are its breadth, its quantitative grounding in recent numerical and observational results, and its explicit acknowledgment of key uncertainties: the factor-of-a-few nuclear-physics uncertainties in supernova bounds, the extrapolation of the axion string spectrum from ℓ~9 to ℓ~70, the cosmological moduli problem in string constructions, and the model dependence of thermal ΔNeff predictions. The review also incorporates very recent developments, such as progenitor-magnetic-field axion-photon conversion and axion quasiparticles, which are not yet in older reviews. The main reservation concerns the robustness of the 'theoretical motivation' pillar: the string-theoretic support is conditional in ways that the abstract and conclusions do not fully convey.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 1, p. 3; Sec. 7] The paper's thesis, stated in Sec. 1 (p. 3) and repeated in Sec. 7, is that the meV mass range is 'theoretically well motivated' and that string model building provides 'large classes of well-motivated ultraviolet completions.' This overstates the support given in the body of the paper. The closed-string construction that gives f_QCD ~ 5×10^9 GeV requires V ~ 10^15, but the text notes that this makes the volume mode mass m_τb ~ O(1) MeV and therefore creates a severe cosmological moduli problem. Avoiding the CMP through V ≲ 10^8 shifts f_QCD to ~10^13–10^16 GeV via Eq. (2.15), outside the meV window, unless one assumes a non-generic late-time dilution or a suppressed initial misplacement. The large-h^{1,1} statistical argument is made at the tip of the stretched Kähler cone and, as the text states, stabilizing all moduli at large h^{1,1} without a CMP 'is still an open question.' The ope
  2. [Sec. 1, p. 3; Sec. 7] The claim that the different approaches 'probe overlapping regions of parameter space' and offer 'robust, cross-validated discovery or exclusion' is plausible but not demonstrated. Helioscopes and haloscopes constrain g_aγ; Cherenkov detectors and neutron-star cooling constrain g_an; CMB experiments constrain the couplings entering ΔNeff; supernova gamma-ray searches depend on the product of production and conversion rates. The fact that several probes have sensitivity at meV masses does not by itself show that they can cross-validate the same QCD axion hypothesis, because the relation between mass and each coupling is model-dependent. Please add a figure or table showing, for representative KSVZ and DFSZ benchmarks, which experiments or foreseen sensitivities reach the relevant couplings at m_a ~ 0.1–10 meV, or soften the cross-validation wording accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6.1)] The coherence condition is written with '≪', but this appears to be a resonance/detuning condition. Please clarify whether the intended meaning is approximate equality or a small-detuning inequality.
  2. [Eq. (2.15) and Sec. 2.2.2] The symbol M_p is used without specifying whether it is the reduced Planck mass or the ordinary Planck mass. This affects the numerical estimates of m_τb (e.g., V~10^8 gives m_τb ~ 10^6–10^7 GeV depending on convention). Please define M_p consistently.
  3. [Sec. 6.5.1 and Eq. (6.8)] The text states that the axion quasiparticle was observed and stable in B|| from 2 to 7 T, while Eq. (6.8) quotes a scanning range 1–10 T. Please specify whether the 1–10 T range is an extrapolation beyond the current measurement.
  4. [Fig. 14] The figure is dense and several experimental labels overlap (e.g., ADMX, CAPP, QUAX). Using a larger font or a separate legend would improve readability.
  5. [Sec. 2.2.1] There is a formatting issue in 'L VS' (should be 'LVS') at first use; the same applies elsewhere in the layout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a review synthesizing independent, code-reproduced results; no prediction reduces to its own input.

full rationale

This is a review paper whose central claim is a synthesis of prior literature rather than a new derivation. I looked for the specific reduction patterns: definitions built from targets, fitted parameters later called predictions, self-citation chains used as the sole justification for a central premise, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own prior work, ansatze smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results. None of these is present in a load-bearing way. The PQ-quality argument (Sec. 2.1) is a standard boundary argument: minimizing the required operator dimension favors smaller f_a, and astrophysical limits set the lower boundary near f_a ~ 5e9 GeV, corresponding to meV masses. This is not circular; it uses external constraints and a standard formula (Eq. 2.3). The string-theory section (Sec. 2.2) is explicit about its own limitations, stating that the closed-string construction 'faces a severe challenge' from the cosmological moduli problem and that stabilizing all moduli at large h^{1,1} without a CMP is 'still an open question.' Such acknowledged caveats weaken the motivation but do not constitute circularity. The large-h^{1,1} statistical result cited to Refs. [10,11] is a numerical computation over the Kreuzer-Skarke database using the public CYTools package; its stated assumptions (tip of the stretched Kahler cone, EFT-control bound from Ref. [63]) do not include the meV target, and it is code-reproduced rather than an unsupported assertion. Although several authors of this review are also authors of those cited works, the independence conditions of the review rule are met. Similarly, the axion-quasiparticle section uses a measured mass m_Theta = 0.18 meV and DFT/measured inputs for detector projections; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. I found no uniqueness theorem or ansatz smuggled via self-citation. The paper is self-contained as a review: its claims are either external, falsifiable, or explicitly flagged as open. Thus the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The review's central claim rests on domain assumptions inherited from the cited literature. The free parameters are inputs the review adopts (not fits performed here); the axioms are the modeling assumptions that must hold for the meV narrative to work. No genuinely new entity is introduced by this paper; the axion quasiparticle is an existing external experimental claim with a falsifiable handle but no independent replication.

free parameters (4)
  • Benchmark axion decay constant f_a = ≈ 5×10^9 GeV (m_a ≈ O(meV))
    The meV program is anchored to this scale (white-dwarf cooling hint / PQ-quality reasoning), adopted throughout Secs. 2, 3, and 5 as the mapping between mass and coupling. It is an input chosen from the literature, not derived in this paper.
  • LMA initial misalignment θ0 − π = ~10^−32 for m_a = 6 meV
    Sec. 3: for large-misalignment axions to be all of the CDM at meV masses, the initial angle must be exponentially tuned; the review itself flags this as finely tuned and constrained by isocurvature (Fig. 2).
  • String-network emission spectral index q (extrapolated to ℓ ~ 70) = q ≈ 1 (blue) vs q > 1 (orange) in Fig. 3
    The post-inflationary CDM mass range 50 µeV ≲ m_a ≲ 0.5 meV (Eq. (3.3)) and the 1–50% CDM contribution (Fig. 3) depend on extrapolating q from simulations at ℓ ≲ 9 to the physical ℓ ~ 70; the review flags the saturating q → 1 possibility as not excluded.
  • Axion-quasiparticle parameters (mΘ, fΘ, loss rates) = mΘ = 0.18 meV (measured); fΘ = 82 eV (DFT); Γρ/ω = 0.2×10^−3; Γm/ω = 0.7×10^−3
    Sec. 6.5.2's projected MnBi2Te4 haloscope sensitivity (Fig. 14) depends on these values, taken from Refs [264,274]; fΘ and loss rates remain experimentally unconfirmed, as the review notes.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard QCD axion mass–decay-constant relation (m_a f_a ≈ m_π f_π) holds for all models discussed.
    Throughout, meV masses are mapped to f_a ~ 5×10^9 GeV. Exceptions (heavy axions, ALPs) are noted only parenthetically in §2.1.
  • domain assumption PQ-breaking operator scaling of Eqs. (2.1)–(2.3), with Λ_UV = M_Pl and O(1) phase δ.
    The PQ-quality argument that singles out low f_a assumes Planck-suppressed, O(1)-phase PQ-breaking operators. Gauge-protected or extra-dimensional solutions listed in §2.1 would not imply the same mass preference.
  • domain assumption Post-inflationary string-network simulations can be extrapolated from ℓ ≲ 9 to physical ℓ ~ 70 to fix axion abundance.
    Sec. 3's CDM mass range relies on this extrapolation and on the debated spectral index q; the review states q → 1 saturation 'cannot be excluded' and different groups disagree.
  • domain assumption The axion-quasiparticle action (Eq. (6.4)) with Θ = 2πh/e² α correctly describes MnBi2Te4, and the measured 44 GHz mode is a dynamical magnetoelectric (axion) oscillation tunable by in-plane B.
    Sec. 6.5 assumes the measured mode is the AQ, that the identification interprets pump-probe Kerr rotation as Θ(t), and that the mass tunes across 0.7–7 meV for B = 1–10 T (Eq. (6.8)). This rests on a single experimental paper (Ref. [264]).
  • domain assumption Dilute instanton gas approximation for the finite-temperature axion potential (cos θ form) in LMA and kinetic-misalignment scenarios.
    Sec. 3's large-misalignment and kinetic-misalignment abundance estimates use the DIGA potential; deviations would change trapping and anharmonic dynamics.
  • domain assumption Type IIB flux-landscape statistics over the Kreuzer–Skarke database, sampled at the tip of the stretched Kähler cone, are a meaningful measure of the meV preference.
    Sec. 2.2.1's meV preference at large h1,1 depends on SKC-tip sampling and the volume bound V ≳ 10^−3.4 (h1,1)^7.2; the review concedes these results are valid only at the tip or along a ray from it.
invented entities (1)
  • Axion quasiparticle (AQ) in MnBi2Te4 independent evidence
    purpose: MeV-scale, B-field-tunable target for axion dark matter detection via AQ-polariton resonance (TOORAD-style haloscope, Eq. (6.5)–(6.8), Fig. 14).
    The claimed mass mΘ = 0.18 meV (44 GHz) from Ref. [264] is an external falsifiable handle, but as of this review it rests on a single published experiment with no cited independent replication.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Axions at the meV Crossroads: Theory, Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F66UFQ6R

@misc{pith2026260318167,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Axions at the meV Crossroads: Theory, Cosmology, Astrophysics, and Experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F66UFQ6R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.18167}
}
read the original abstract

The meV mass range has emerged as a focal point in axion physics, where advances in theory, cosmology, astrophysics, and experimental techniques converge. Axions in this mass range are theoretically well motivated, can arise in ultraviolet-complete models, and can have significant cosmological impacts as dark matter or dark radiation. In parallel, their efficient production in stellar and supernova environments provides powerful astrophysical probes. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of meV axions across these domains, highlighting both established results and open questions. We discuss the theoretical underpinnings of meV axions, their cosmological and astrophysical signatures, and the diverse experimental strategies -- ranging from helioscopes and haloscopes to quasiparticle systems and large-volume Cherenkov detectors -- that aim to explore this regime. The convergence of these approaches emphasizes the pivotal role of the meV mass range for axion discovery in the coming years, identifying meV axions as a key probe for testing beyond-Standard-Model physics. This review document is the direct outcome of the discussions at the dedicated workshop "The meV Mass Axion Frontier: Challenges and Opportunities", held at Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (IT) on 27--28 October 2025, and organized by the EU funded COST Action "Cosmic WISPers in the Dark Universe: Theory, astrophysics, and experiments" (CA21106, https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA21106). Its aim is to provide an overview of current efforts in meV axion research, their motivations, and the research goals that animate the community involved in this search.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lights, Camera, Axion: Tracing Axions from Supernovae in the Diffuse $\gamma$-ray Sky

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Axions produced in supernovae generate a diffuse gamma-ray signal through conversion in magnetic fields, yielding competitive constraints on the axion-photon coupling from COMPTEL, EGRET, and Fermi-LAT data plus forec...

  2. Solar axion searches with RES-NOVA: projected sensitivity and first prototype limit

    hep-ex 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RES-NOVA's projected 1 ton-year sensitivity reaches within a factor of ~2 of XENONnT on the solar-axion electron coupling, and a 32.4 g-day archaeological-lead prototype excludes new parts of the (g_ae, g_aγ) plane.

  3. Searching for axions with quantum interferometry

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Axion-photon coupling imprints measurable Aharonov-Bohm and Berry phases in superconducting circuits and interferometers, projecting sensitivity to g_aγγ ~ 7.8e-14 GeV^{-1} at m_a ~ 1e-10 eV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

265 extracted references · 184 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Raffelt, J

    G.G. Raffelt, J. Redondo and N. Viaux Maira,The meV mass frontier of axion physics,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 103008 [1110.6397]

    arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    Conlon,The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation,JHEP05(2006) 078 [hep-th/0602233]

    J.P. Conlon,The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation,JHEP05(2006) 078 [hep-th/0602233]

    arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald,The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology,JHEP10(2012) 146 [1206.0819]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Broeckel, M

    I. Broeckel, M. Cicoli, A. Maharana, K. Singh and K. Sinha,Moduli stabilisation and the statistics of axion physics in the landscape,JHEP08(2021) 059 [2105.02889]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Hebecker, J. Jaeckel and M. Wittner,Axions in string theory — slaying the Hydra of dark radiation,JHEP09(2022) 198 [2203.08833]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Klevers, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,Explicit de Sitter Flux Vacua for Global String Models with Chiral Matter,JHEP05(2014) 001 [1312.0014]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Cicoli, V.A

    M. Cicoli, V.A. Diaz, V. Guidetti and M. Rummel,The 3.5 keV Line from Stringy Axions, JHEP10(2017) 192 [1707.02987]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open string axiverse,JHEP07(2025) 049 [2503.16387]

    arXiv 2025

Show all 265 references
  1. [9]

    Loladze, A

    V. Loladze, A. Platschorre and M. Reig,Higher axion strings,JHEP08(2025) 182 [2503.18707]

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Mehta, M

    V.M. Mehta, M. Demirtas, C. Long, D.J.E. Marsh, L. Mcallister and M.J. Stott, Superradiance Exclusions in the Landscape of Type IIB String Theory,2011.08693

    2011 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mehta, M

    V.M. Mehta, M. Demirtas, C. Long, D.J.E. Marsh, L. McAllister and M.J. Stott, Superradiance in string theory,JCAP07(2021) 033 [2103.06812]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 38(1977) 1440

    1977

  5. [13]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791

    1977

  6. [14]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223. – 47 –

    1978

  7. [15]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

    1978

  8. [16]

    Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys

    J.E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    1979

  9. [17]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493

    1980

  10. [18]

    Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions

    A.R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

    1980

  11. [19]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199

    1981

  12. [20]

    Georgi, L.J

    H.M. Georgi, L.J. Hall and M.B. Wise,Grand Unified Models With an Automatic Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 409

    1981

  13. [21]

    Dine and N

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg,String Theory and the Strong CP Problem,Nucl. Phys. B273 (1986) 109

    1986

  14. [22]

    Barr and D

    S.M. Barr and D. Seckel,Planck scale corrections to axion models,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 539

    1992

  15. [23]

    Kamionkowski and J

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell,Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 137 [hep-th/9202003]

    1992 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Holman, S.D.H

    R. Holman, S.D.H. Hsu, T.W. Kephart, E.W. Kolb, R. Watkins and L.M. Widrow,Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,Phys. Lett. B282(1992) 132 [hep-ph/9203206]

    1992 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Ghigna, M

    S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli and M. Roncadelli,Instability of the invisible axion,Phys. Lett. B 283(1992) 278

    1992

  18. [26]

    Rubakov,Grand unification and heavy axion,JETP Lett.65(1997) 621 [hep-ph/9703409]

    V.A. Rubakov,Grand unification and heavy axion,JETP Lett.65(1997) 621 [hep-ph/9703409]

    1997 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Berezhiani, L

    Z. Berezhiani, L. Gianfagna and M. Giannotti,Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited,Phys. Lett. B500(2001) 286 [hep-ph/0009290]

    2001 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Randall,Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,Phys

    L. Randall,Composite axion models and Planck scale physics,Phys. Lett. B284(1992) 77

    1992

  21. [29]

    Dobrescu,The Strong CP problem versus Planck scale physics,Phys

    B.A. Dobrescu,The Strong CP problem versus Planck scale physics,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5826 [hep-ph/9609221]

    1997 arXiv

  22. [30]

    K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze and K. Wang,Stabilizing the axion by discrete gauge symmetries, Phys. Lett. B560(2003) 214 [hep-ph/0212339]

    2003 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Redi and R

    M. Redi and R. Sato,Composite Accidental Axions,JHEP05(2016) 104 [1602.05427]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Fukuda, M

    H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and T.T. Yanagida,A ”gauged”U(1)Peccei–Quinn symmetry, Phys. Lett. B771(2017) 327 [1703.01112]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Di Luzio, E

    L. Di Luzio, E. Nardi and L. Ubaldi,Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 011801 [1704.01122]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bonnefoy, E

    Q. Bonnefoy, E. Dudas and S. Pokorski,Axions in a highly protected gauge symmetry model, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 31 [1804.01112]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Lillard and T.M.P

    B. Lillard and T.M.P. Tait,A High Quality Composite Axion,JHEP11(2018) 199 [1811.03089]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Gavela, M

    M.B. Gavela, M. Ibe, P. Quilez and T.T. Yanagida,Automatic Peccei–Quinn symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 542 [1812.08174]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Lee and W

    H.-S. Lee and W. Yin,Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a hidden gauge group structure,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 015041 [1811.04039]. – 48 –

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    M. Ardu, L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, A. Strumia, D. Teresi and J.-W. Wang,Axion quality from the (anti)symmetric of SU(N),JHEP11(2020) 090 [2007.12663]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Di Luzio,Accidental SO(10) axion from gauged flavour,JHEP11(2020) 074 [2008.09119]

    L. Di Luzio,Accidental SO(10) axion from gauged flavour,JHEP11(2020) 074 [2008.09119]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Yin,Scale and quality of Peccei-Quinn symmetry and weak gravity conjectures,JHEP10 (2020) 032 [2007.13320]

    W. Yin,Scale and quality of Peccei-Quinn symmetry and weak gravity conjectures,JHEP10 (2020) 032 [2007.13320]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Contino, A

    R. Contino, A. Podo and F. Revello,Chiral models of composite axions and accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry,JHEP04(2022) 180 [2112.09635]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Di Luzio, G

    L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, F. Mescia and V. Susiˇ c,High-quality Peccei-Quinn symmetry from the interplay of vertical and horizontal gauge symmetries,2503.16648

  35. [43]

    Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,Phys

    E. Witten,Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 351

    1984

  36. [44]

    Cicoli, C

    M. Cicoli, C. Mayrhofer and R. Valandro,Moduli Stabilisation for Chiral Global Models, JHEP02(2012) 062 [1110.3333]

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Muia and P. Shukla,Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,JHEP11 (2016) 182 [1611.04612]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, V.A. Diaz, V. Guidetti, F. Muia and P. Shukla,Chiral Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,JHEP11(2017) 207 [1709.01518]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cicoli, A

    M. Cicoli, A. Grassi, O. Lacombe and F.G. Pedro,Chiral global embedding of Fibre Inflation with D3uplift,JHEP06(2025) 090 [2412.08723]

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald,Testing String Vacua in the Lab: From a Hidden CMB to Dark Forces in Flux Compactifications,JHEP07(2011) 114 [1103.3705]

    2011 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Allahverdi, M

    R. Allahverdi, M. Cicoli, B. Dutta and K. Sinha,Correlation between Dark Matter and Dark Radiation in String Compactifications,JCAP10(2014) 002 [1401.4364]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y.V. Stadnik and P. Wolf,Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 064051 [1807.04512]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Coughlan, W

    G.D. Coughlan, W. Fischler, E.W. Kolb, S. Raby and G.G. Ross,Cosmological Problems for the Polonyi Potential,Phys. Lett. B131(1983) 59

    1983

  44. [52]

    Banks, D.B

    T. Banks, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson,Cosmological implications of dynamical supersymmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 779 [hep-ph/9308292]

    1994 arXiv

  45. [53]

    de Carlos, J.A

    B. de Carlos, J.A. Casas, F. Quevedo and E. Roulet,Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-d strings,Phys. Lett. B318 (1993) 447 [hep-ph/9308325]

    1993 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Conlon and F.G

    J.P. Conlon and F.G. Pedro,Moduli Redefinitions and Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP06(2010) 082 [1003.0388]

    2010 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,JHEP03(2005) 007 [hep-th/0502058]

    2005 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,General Analysis of LARGE Volume Scenarios with String Loop Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP10(2008) 105 [0805.1029]

    2008 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Systematics of String Loop Corrections in Type IIB Calabi-Yau Flux Compactifications,JHEP01(2008) 052 [0708.1873]

    2008 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Blumenhagen, S

    R. Blumenhagen, S. Moster and E. Plauschinn,Moduli Stabilisation versus Chirality for MSSM like Type IIB Orientifolds,JHEP01(2008) 058 [0711.3389]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Chauhan, M

    A. Chauhan, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, P. Piantadosi and A. Schachner,Deep observations of the Type IIB flux landscape,JHEP07(2025) 271 [2501.03984]. – 49 –

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke,Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000) 1209 [hep-th/0002240]

    2000 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Demirtas, A

    M. Demirtas, A. Rios-Tascon and L. McAllister,CYTools: A Software Package for Analyzing Calabi-Yau Manifolds,2211.03823

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Fallon, J

    S.V.P. Fallon, J. Halverson, L. McAllister and Y. Zhu,F-theory Axiverse,2511.20458

  55. [63]

    Demirtas, C

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister and M. Stillman,The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse,JHEP 04(2020) 138 [1808.01282]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Raffelt,Astrophysical axion bounds,Lect

    G.G. Raffelt,Astrophysical axion bounds,Lect. Notes Phys.741(2008) 51 [hep-ph/0611350]

    2008 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Caputo and G

    A. Caputo and G. Raffelt,Astrophysical Axion Bounds: The 2024 Edition,PoS COSMICWISPers(2024) 041 [2401.13728]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Gendler and D.J.E

    N. Gendler and D.J.E. Marsh,Possible Implications of QCD Axion Dark Matter Constraints from Helioscopes and Haloscopes for the String Theory Landscape,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 081602 [2407.07143]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gendler, D.J.E

    N. Gendler, D.J.E. Marsh, L. McAllister and J. Moritz,Glimmers from the axiverse,JCAP 09(2024) 071 [2309.13145]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Cicoli, D

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, S. de Alwis and F. Muia,α ′ Inflation: moduli stabilisation and observable tensors from higher derivatives,JHEP09(2016) 026 [1607.01395]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Demirtas, N

    M. Demirtas, N. Gendler, C. Long, L. McAllister and J. Moritz,PQ axiverse,JHEP06 (2023) 092 [2112.04503]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Benabou, K

    J.N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig and B.R. Safdi,String theory and grand unification suggest a submicroelectronvolt QCD axion,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 066003 [2505.15884]

    2025 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Sheridan, F

    E. Sheridan, F. Carta, N. Gendler, M. Jain, D.J.E. Marsh, L. McAllister et al.,Fuzzy axions and associated relics,JHEP09(2025) 016 [2412.12012]

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Cicoli, S

    M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,D-Branes at del Pezzo Singularities: Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP09(2012) 019 [1206.5237]

    2012 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Cicoli, S

    M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo and R. Valandro,D3/D7 Branes at Singularities: Constraints from Global Embedding and Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP07(2013) 150 [1304.0022]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Cicoli, I

    M. Cicoli, I. Garc ` ıa-Etxebarria, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo, P. Shukla and R. Valandro,Global Orientifolded Quivers with Inflation,JHEP11(2017) 134 [1706.06128]

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Cicoli, I.G

    M. Cicoli, I.G. Etxebarria, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, P. Shukla and R. Valandro,The Standard Model quiver in de Sitter string compactifications,JHEP08(2021) 109 [2106.11964]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Choi, H.P

    K. Choi, H.P. Nilles, C.S. Shin and M. Trapletti,Sparticle Spectrum of Large Volume Compactification,JHEP02(2011) 047 [1011.0999]

    2011 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Blumenhagen, J.P

    R. Blumenhagen, J.P. Conlon, S. Krippendorf, S. Moster and F. Quevedo,SUSY Breaking in Local String/F-Theory Models,JHEP09(2009) 007 [0906.3297]

    2009 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Aparicio, M

    L. Aparicio, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, F. Muia and F. Quevedo,Sequestered de Sitter String Scenarios: Soft-terms,JHEP11(2014) 071 [1409.1931]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit,Standard Model—axion—seesaw—Higgs portal inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke,JCAP08(2017) 001 [1610.01639]

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, L. Lehner, J.O. Thompson and K. Van Tilburg, Large-misalignment mechanism for the formation of compact axion structures: Signatures from the QCD axion to fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 083014 [1909.11665]. – 50 –

    2020 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Borsanyi et al.,Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,Nature539(2016) 69 [1606.07494]

    S. Borsanyi et al.,Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,Nature539(2016) 69 [1606.07494]

    2016 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Kurematsu and F. Takahashi,Isocurvature Constraints and Anharmonic Effects on QCD Axion Dark Matter,JCAP09(2013) 032 [1304.0922]. [83]IAXOcollaboration,Physics potential of the International Axion Observatory (IAXO),JCAP 06(2019) 047 [1904.09155]

    2013 arXiv

  75. [84]

    R.T. Co, L.J. Hall and K. Harigaya,Axion Kinetic Misalignment Mechanism,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 251802 [1910.14152]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Er¨ oncel, R

    C. Er¨ oncel, R. Sato, G. Servant and P. Sørensen,ALP dark matter from kinetic fragmentation: opening up the parameter window,JCAP10(2022) 053 [2206.14259]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Fasiello, J

    M. Fasiello, J. Lizarraga, A. Papageorgiou and A. Urio,Kinetic Fragmentation of the QCD Axion on the Lattice,2507.01822

  78. [87]

    Er¨ oncel and G

    C. Er¨ oncel and G. Servant,ALP dark matter mini-clusters from kinetic fragmentation,JCAP 01(2023) 009 [2207.10111]

    2023 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Chathirathas, C

    K. Chathirathas, C. Er¨ oncel, M. Kaltschmidt, J. Redondo and K. Saikawa,Axion Miniclusters in the Pre-Inflationary Scenario,in preparation(2026)

    2026

  80. [89]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy and G. Villadoro,Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution, JHEP07(2018) 151 [1806.04677]

    2018 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy and G. Villadoro,More axions from strings,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 050 [2007.04990]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Hindmarsh, J

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren and J. Urrestilla,Comment on ”More Axions from Strings”,2109.09679

    arXiv

  83. [92]

    Buschmann, J.W

    M. Buschmann, J.W. Foster and B.R. Safdi,Early-Universe Simulations of the Cosmological Axion,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 161103 [1906.00967]

    2020 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Buschmann, J.W

    M. Buschmann, J.W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D.E. Willcox, W. Zhang et al.,Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement,Nature Commun.13(2022) 1049 [2108.05368]

    2022 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Saikawa, J

    K. Saikawa, J. Redondo, A. Vaquero and M. Kaltschmidt,Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass,JCAP10(2024) 043 [2401.17253]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [95]

    H. Kim, J. Park and M. Son,Axion dark matter from cosmic string network,JHEP07(2024) 150 [2402.00741]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [96]

    Benabou, M

    J.N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J.W. Foster and B.R. Safdi,Axion Mass Prediction from Adaptive Mesh Refinement Cosmological Lattice Simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 241003 [2412.08699]

    2025 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Correia, M

    J. Correia, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, K. Rummukainen and J. Urrestilla,Scaling density of axion strings in terasite simulations,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063532 [2410.18064]

    2025 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Correia, M

    J. Correia, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, K. Rummukainen and J. Urrestilla,The spectrum of axions in a scaling string network,2512.13653

  90. [99]

    Klaer and G.D

    V.B.. Klaer and G.D. Moore,The dark-matter axion mass,JCAP11(2017) 049 [1708.07521]

    2017 arXiv

  91. [100]

    Klaer and G.D

    V.B. Klaer and G.D. Moore,How to simulate global cosmic strings with large string tension, JCAP10(2017) 043 [1707.05566]

    2017 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Klaer and G.D

    V.B. Klaer and G.D. Moore,Global cosmic string networks as a function of tension,JCAP 06(2020) 021 [1912.08058]. – 51 –

    2020 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Fleury and G.D

    L. Fleury and G.D. Moore,Axion dark matter: strings and their cores,JCAP01(2016) 004 [1509.00026]

    2016 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Vaquero, J

    A. Vaquero, J. Redondo and J. Stadler,Early seeds of axion miniclusters,JCAP04(2019) 012 [1809.09241]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Bennett and F.R

    D.P. Bennett and F.R. Bouchet,High resolution simulations of cosmic string evolution. 1. Network evolution,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 2408

    1990

  96. [105]

    Daverio, M

    D. Daverio, M. Hindmarsh, M. Kunz, J. Lizarraga and J. Urrestilla,Energy-momentum correlations for Abelian Higgs cosmic strings,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 085014 [1510.05006]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Vilenkin and T

    A. Vilenkin and T. Vachaspati,Radiation of Goldstone Bosons From Cosmic Strings,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 1138

    1987

  98. [107]

    Davis and E.P.S

    R.L. Davis and E.P.S. Shellard,Antisymmetric Tensors and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Lett. B214(1988) 219

    1988

  99. [108]

    Arza et al.,The COSMIC WISPers White Paper: The physics case for Weakly Interacting Slim Particles,2603.03433

    A. Arza et al.,The COSMIC WISPers White Paper: The physics case for Weakly Interacting Slim Particles,2603.03433

  100. [109]

    Zeldovich, I.Y

    Y.B. Zeldovich, I.Y. Kobzarev and L.B. Okun,Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67(1974) 3

    1974

  101. [110]

    Sikivie,Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe,Phys

    P. Sikivie,Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1156

    1982

  102. [111]

    Kallosh, A.D

    R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind,Gravity and global symmetries,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

    1995 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Gelmini, M

    G.B. Gelmini, M. Gleiser and E.W. Kolb,Cosmology of Biased Discrete Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 1558

    1989

  104. [113]

    Larsson, S

    S.E. Larsson, S. Sarkar and P.L. White,Evading the cosmological domain wall problem,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5129 [hep-ph/9608319]

    1997 arXiv

  105. [114]

    Chang, C

    S. Chang, C. Hagmann and P. Sikivie,Studies of the motion and decay of axion walls bounded by strings,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 023505 [hep-ph/9807374]

    1999 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa and T. Sekiguchi,Axion cosmology with long-lived domain walls,JCAP01(2013) 001 [1207.3166]

    2013 arXiv

  107. [116]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa and T. Sekiguchi,Axion dark matter from topological defects,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 065014 [1412.0789]

    2015 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Ringwald and K

    A. Ringwald and K. Saikawa,Axion dark matter in the post-inflationary Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking scenario,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 085031 [1512.06436]

    2016 arXiv

  109. [118]

    Arvanitaki and A.A

    A. Arvanitaki and A.A. Geraci,Resonantly Detecting Axion-Mediated Forces with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 161801 [1403.1290]

    2014 arXiv

  110. [119]

    Giannotti, I.G

    M. Giannotti, I.G. Irastorza, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and K. Saikawa,Stellar Recipes for Axion Hunters,JCAP10(2017) 010 [1708.02111]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Saikawa,A review of gravitational waves from cosmic domain walls,Universe3(2017) 40 [1703.02576]

    K. Saikawa,A review of gravitational waves from cosmic domain walls,Universe3(2017) 40 [1703.02576]

    2017 arXiv

  112. [121]

    Ferrer, E

    F. Ferrer, E. Masso, G. Panico, O. Pujolas and F. Rompineve,Primordial Black Holes from the QCD axion,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 101301 [1807.01707]

    2019 arXiv

  113. [122]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin,More is different: multi-axion dynamics changes topological defect evolution,JCAP04(2025) 002 [2409.09749]

    2025 arXiv

  114. [123]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin,Resolving the QCD axion domain wall problem with a light axion,JHEP01(2026) 124 [2507.07075]. – 52 –

    2026

  115. [124]

    Gorghetto and E

    M. Gorghetto and E. Hardy,Post-inflationary axions: a minimal target for axion haloscopes, JHEP05(2023) 030 [2212.13263]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Pierobon, J

    G. Pierobon, J. Redondo, K. Saikawa, A. Vaquero and G.D. Moore,Miniclusters from axion string simulations,2307.09941

    arXiv

  117. [126]

    Chang and K

    S. Chang and K. Choi,Hadronic axion window and the big bang nucleosynthesis,Phys. Lett. B316(1993) 51 [hep-ph/9306216]

    1993 arXiv

  118. [127]

    Masso, F

    E. Masso, F. Rota and G. Zsembinszki,On axion thermalization in the early universe,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 023004 [hep-ph/0203221]

    2002 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Graf and F.D

    P. Graf and F.D. Steffen,Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 075011 [1008.4528]

    2011 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Brust, D.E

    C. Brust, D.E. Kaplan and M.T. Walters,New Light Species and the CMB,JHEP12(2013) 058 [1303.5379]

    2013 arXiv

  121. [130]

    Salvio, A

    A. Salvio, A. Strumia and W. Xue,Thermal axion production,JCAP01(2014) 011 [1310.6982]

    2014 arXiv

  122. [131]

    D’Eramo, L.J

    F. D’Eramo, L.J. Hall and D. Pappadopulo,Multiverse Dark Matter: SUSY or Axions,JHEP 11(2014) 108 [1409.5123]

    2014 arXiv

  123. [132]

    Baumann, D

    D. Baumann, D. Green and B. Wallisch,New Target for Cosmic Axion Searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 171301 [1604.08614]

    2016 arXiv

  124. [133]

    Ferreira and A

    R.Z. Ferreira and A. Notari,Observable Windows for the QCD Axion Through the Number of Relativistic Species,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 191301 [1801.06090]

    2018 arXiv

  125. [134]

    D’Eramo, R.Z

    F. D’Eramo, R.Z. Ferreira, A. Notari and J.L. Bernal,Hot Axions and theH 0 tension,JCAP 11(2018) 014 [1808.07430]

    2018 arXiv

  126. [135]

    Arias-Arag´ on, F

    F. Arias-Arag´ on, F. D’eramo, R.Z. Ferreira, L. Merlo and A. Notari,Cosmic Imprints of XENON1T Axions,JCAP11(2020) 025 [2007.06579]

    2020 arXiv

  127. [136]

    Arias-Arag´ on, F

    F. Arias-Arag´ on, F. D’Eramo, R.Z. Ferreira, L. Merlo and A. Notari,Production of Thermal Axions across the ElectroWeak Phase Transition,JCAP03(2021) 090 [2012.04736]

    2021 arXiv

  128. [137]

    Ferreira, A

    R.Z. Ferreira, A. Notari and F. Rompineve,Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky axion in the CMB,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063524 [2012.06566]

    2021 arXiv

  129. [138]

    Green, Y

    D. Green, Y. Guo and B. Wallisch,Cosmological implications of axion-matter couplings, JCAP02(2022) 019 [2109.12088]

    2022 arXiv

  130. [139]

    D’Eramo, F

    F. D’Eramo, F. Hajkarim and S. Yun,Thermal Axion Production at Low Temperatures: A Smooth Treatment of the QCD Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 152001 [2108.04259]

    2022 arXiv

  131. [140]

    D’Eramo, F

    F. D’Eramo, F. Hajkarim and S. Yun,Thermal QCD Axions across Thresholds,JHEP10 (2021) 224 [2108.05371]

    2021 arXiv

  132. [141]

    D’Eramo and S

    F. D’Eramo and S. Yun,Flavor violating axions in the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 075002 [2111.12108]

    2022 arXiv

  133. [142]

    D’Eramo, E

    F. D’Eramo, E. Di Valentino, W. Giar` e, F. Hajkarim, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena et al., Cosmological bound on the QCD axion mass, redux,JCAP09(2022) 022 [2205.07849]

    2022 arXiv

  134. [143]

    Caloni, M

    L. Caloni, M. Gerbino, M. Lattanzi and L. Visinelli,Novel cosmological bounds on thermally-produced axion-like particles,JCAP09(2022) 021 [2205.01637]

    2022 arXiv

  135. [144]

    Notari, F

    A. Notari, F. Rompineve and G. Villadoro,Improved Hot Dark Matter Bound on the QCD Axion,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 011004 [2211.03799]

    2023 arXiv

  136. [145]

    Bianchini, G.G

    F. Bianchini, G.G. di Cortona and M. Valli,QCD axion: Some like it hot,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 123527 [2310.08169]. – 53 –

    2024 arXiv

  137. [146]

    D’Eramo, F

    F. D’Eramo, F. Hajkarim and A. Lenoci,Dark radiation from the primordial thermal bath in momentum space,JCAP03(2024) 009 [2311.04974]

    2024 arXiv

  138. [147]

    Bouzoud and J

    K. Bouzoud and J. Ghiglieri,Thermal axion production at hard and soft momenta,JHEP01 (2025) 163 [2404.06113]

    2025 arXiv

  139. [148]

    Caloni, P

    L. Caloni, P. Stengel, M. Lattanzi and M. Gerbino,Constraining UV freeze-in of light relics with current and next-generation CMB observations,JCAP10(2024) 106 [2405.09449]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [149]

    D’Eramo and A

    F. D’Eramo and A. Lenoci,Back to the phase space: Thermal axion dark radiation via couplings to standard model fermions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 116028 [2410.21253]

    2024

  141. [150]

    Badziak and M

    M. Badziak and M. Laletin,Precise predictions for the QCD axion contribution to dark radiation with full phase-space evolution,JHEP02(2025) 108 [2410.18186]

    2025 arXiv

  142. [151]

    Badziak, A

    M. Badziak, A. Gomu lka, M. Laletin and K. Szafra´ nski,Improved cosmological constraints on axion-lepton interactions,2511.14864. [152]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]. [153]Simons Observatorycol...

    2018 arXiv

  143. [155]

    Di Luzio, G

    L. Di Luzio, G. Martinelli and G. Piazza,Breakdown of chiral perturbation theory for the axion hot dark matter bound,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 241801 [2101.10330]

    2021 arXiv

  144. [156]

    Di Luzio, J

    L. Di Luzio, J. Martin Camalich, G. Martinelli, J.A. Oller and G. Piazza,Axion-pion thermalization rate in unitarized NLO chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 035025 [2211.05073]

    2023 arXiv

  145. [157]

    Carenza, M

    P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Isern, A. Mirizzi and O. Straniero,Axion astrophysics,Phys. Rept.1117(2025) 1 [2411.02492]

    2025 arXiv

  146. [158]

    Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys

    N. Iwamoto,Axion Emission from Neutron Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.53(1984) 1198

    1984

  147. [159]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,Bounds on Exotic Particle Interactions from SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. Lett.60(1988) 1793

    1988

  148. [160]

    Ellis and K.A

    J.R. Ellis and K.A. Olive,Constraints on light particles from supernova SN 1987A,Phys. Lett. B193(1987) 525

    1987

  149. [161]

    Turner,Axions from SN 1987A,Phys

    M.S. Turner,Axions from SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. Lett.60(1988) 1797

    1988

  150. [162]

    Mayle, J.R

    R. Mayle, J.R. Wilson, J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive, D.N. Schramm and G. Steigman,Constraints on Axions from SN 1987A,Phys. Lett. B203(1988) 188

    1988

  151. [163]

    Mayle, J.R

    R. Mayle, J.R. Wilson, J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive, D.N. Schramm and G. Steigman,Updated constraints on axions from SN1987A,Phys. Lett. B219(1989) 515

    1989

  152. [164]

    Brinkmann and M.S

    R.P. Brinkmann and M.S. Turner,Numerical Rates for Nucleon-Nucleon Axion Bremsstrahlung,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 2338

    1988

  153. [165]

    Burrows, M.S

    A. Burrows, M.S. Turner and R.P. Brinkmann,Axions and SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 1020

    1989

  154. [166]

    Burrows, M.T

    A. Burrows, M.T. Ressell and M.S. Turner,Axions and SN1987A: Axion trapping,Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3297

    1990

  155. [167]

    Janka, W

    H.-T. Janka, W. Keil, G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,Nucleon spin fluctuations and the supernova emission of neutrinos and axions,Phys. Rev. Lett.76(1996) 2621 [astro-ph/9507023]

    1996 arXiv

  156. [168]

    Keil, H.-T

    W. Keil, H.-T. Janka, D.N. Schramm, G. Sigl, M.S. Turner and J.R. Ellis,A Fresh look at axions and SN-1987A,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 2419 [astro-ph/9612222]. – 54 –

    1997 arXiv

  157. [169]

    Hanhart, D.R

    C. Hanhart, D.R. Phillips and S. Reddy,Neutrino and axion emissivities of neutron stars from nucleon-nucleon scattering data,Phys. Lett. B499(2001) 9 [astro-ph/0003445]

    2001 arXiv

  158. [170]

    Fiorillo, A

    D.F.G. Fiorillo, A. Lella, C.A.J. O’Hare and E. Vitagliano,Leading Bounds on Micrometer to Picometer Fifth Forces from Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 211003 [2506.19906]

    2025

  159. [171]

    Buschmann, C

    M. Buschmann, C. Dessert, J.W. Foster, A.J. Long and B.R. Safdi,Upper Limit on the QCD Axion Mass from Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 091102 [2111.09892]

    2022 arXiv

  160. [172]

    Fiorillo, M

    D.F.G. Fiorillo, M. Heinlein, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, E. Vitagliano and R. Bollig,Supernova simulations confront SN 1987A neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 083040 [2308.01403]

    2023 arXiv

  161. [173]

    Caputo, G

    A. Caputo, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Radiative transfer in stars by feebly interacting bosons,JCAP08(2022) 045 [2204.11862]

    2022 arXiv

  162. [174]

    Fiorillo, T

    D.F.G. Fiorillo, T. Pitik and E. Vitagliano,Energy Transfer by Feebly Interacting Particles in Supernovae: The Trapping Regime,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 071005 [2503.13653]

    2025

  163. [175]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,Multiple scattering suppression of the bremsstrahlung emission of neutrinos and axions in supernovae,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 2605

    1991

  164. [176]

    Turner,Dirac neutrinos and SN 1987A,Phys

    M.S. Turner,Dirac neutrinos and SN 1987A,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 1066

    1992

  165. [177]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,A selfconsistent approach to neutral current processes in supernova cores,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 1780 [astro-ph/9312019]

    1995 arXiv

  166. [178]

    Raffelt and G

    G. Raffelt and G. Sigl,Numerical toy model calculation of the nucleon spin autocorrelation function in a supernova core,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 023001 [hep-ph/9808476]

    1999 arXiv

  167. [179]

    Sedrakian and A.E.L

    A. Sedrakian and A.E.L. Dieperink,Coherent neutrino radiation in supernovae at two loops, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 083002 [astro-ph/0002228]

    2000 arXiv

  168. [180]

    van Dalen, A.E.L

    E.N.E. van Dalen, A.E.L. Dieperink and J.A. Tjon,Neutrino emission in neutron stars,Phys. Rev. C67(2003) 065807 [nucl-th/0303037]

    2003 arXiv

  169. [181]

    Lykasov, C.J

    G.I. Lykasov, C.J. Pethick and A. Schwenk,Unified approach to structure factors and neutrino processes in nucleon matter,Phys. Rev. C78(2008) 045803 [0808.0330]

    2008 arXiv

  170. [182]

    Chang, R

    J.H. Chang, R. Essig and S.D. McDermott,Supernova 1987A Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Sectors, Millicharged Particles, the QCD Axion, and an Axion-like Particle,JHEP09(2018) 051 [1803.00993]

    2018 arXiv

  171. [183]

    Carenza, T

    P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, G. Guo, G. Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo and A. Mirizzi,Improved axion emissivity from a supernova via nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung,JCAP10(2019) 016 [1906.11844]

    2019 arXiv

  172. [184]

    Carenza, B

    P. Carenza, B. Fore, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and S. Reddy,Enhanced Supernova Axion Emission and its Implications,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 071102 [2010.02943]

    2021 arXiv

  173. [185]

    Choi, H.J

    K. Choi, H.J. Kim, H. Seong and C.S. Shin,Axion emission from supernova with axion-pion-nucleon contact interaction,JHEP02(2022) 143 [2110.01972]

    2022 arXiv

  174. [186]

    S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, P. Ko and J.-h. Park,Supernova axion emissivity with∆(1232) resonance in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 075002 [2212.01155]

    2023 arXiv

  175. [187]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi,Protoneutron stars as cosmic factories for massive axionlike particles,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 103017 [2211.13760]

    2023 arXiv

  176. [188]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Co’, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi et al.,Getting the most on supernova axions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023001 [2306.01048]. – 55 –

    2024 arXiv

  177. [189]

    Fiorillo, ´A

    D.F.G. Fiorillo, ´A. Gil Muyor, H.-T. Janka, G.G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano,Axion-photon conversion in transient compact stars: Systematics, constraints, and opportunities, 2509.13322

    arXiv

  178. [190]

    Ericson and J.-F

    T.E. Ericson and J.-F. Mathiot,Axion emission from sn1987a. nuclear physics constraints, Physics Letters B219(1989) 507

    1989

  179. [191]

    Schwenk, P

    A. Schwenk, P. Jaikumar and C. Gale,Neutrino bremsstrahlung in neutron matter from effective nuclear interactions,Phys. Lett. B584(2004) 241 [nucl-th/0309072]

    2004 arXiv

  180. [192]

    Schwenk and B

    A. Schwenk and B. Friman,Polarization contributions to the spin dependence of the effective interaction in neutron matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 082501 [nucl-th/0307089]

    2004 arXiv

  181. [193]

    Shternin, M

    P.S. Shternin, M. Baldo and P. Haensel,In-medium enhancement of the modified Urca neutrino reaction rates,Phys. Lett. B786(2018) 28 [1807.06569]

    2018 arXiv

  182. [194]

    Fore and S

    B. Fore and S. Reddy,Pions in hot dense matter and their astrophysical implications,Phys. Rev. C101(2020) 035809 [1911.02632]

    2020 arXiv

  183. [195]

    Fischer, P

    T. Fischer, P. Carenza, B. Fore, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and S. Reddy,Observable signatures of enhanced axion emission from protoneutron stars,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103012 [2108.13726]

    2021 arXiv

  184. [196]

    B. Fore, N. Kaiser, S. Reddy and N.C. Warrington,Mass of charged pions in neutron-star matter,Phys. Rev. C110(2024) 025803 [2301.07226]

    2024 arXiv

  185. [197]

    Ericson and W

    T. Ericson and W. Weise,Pions and nuclei,

  186. [198]

    Brockway, E.D

    J.W. Brockway, E.D. Carlson and G.G. Raffelt,SN 1987A gamma-ray limits on the conversion of pseudoscalars,Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 439 [astro-ph/9605197]

    1996 arXiv

  187. [199]

    Grifols, E

    J.A. Grifols, E. Mass´ o and R. Toldr` a,Gamma Rays from SN 1987A due to Pseudoscalar Conversion,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 2372 [astro-ph/9606028]

    1996 arXiv

  188. [200]

    Payez, C

    A. Payez, C. Evoli, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and A. Ringwald,Revisiting the SN1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles,JCAP02(2015) 006 [1410.3747]

    2015 arXiv

  189. [201]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel and A. Mirizzi,Bounds on axionlike particles from the diffuse supernova flux,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 123005 [2008.11741]

    2020 arXiv

  190. [202]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, C. Eckner, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel et al.,3D template-based Fermi-LAT constraints on the diffuse supernova axion-like particle background, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 063028 [2110.03679]

    2022 arXiv

  191. [203]

    Hoof and L

    S. Hoof and L. Schulz,Updated constraints on axion-like particles from temporal information in supernova SN1987A gamma-ray data,JCAP03(2023) 054 [2212.09764]

    2023 arXiv

  192. [204]

    Forrest, E.L

    D.J. Forrest, E.L. Chupp, J.M. Ryan, M.L. Cherry, I.U. Gleske, C. Reppin et al.,The gamma ray spectrometer for the Solar Maximum Mission.,Sol. Phys.65(1980) 15

    1980

  193. [205]

    Chupp, W.T

    E.L. Chupp, W.T. Vestrand and C. Reppin,Experimental Limits on the Radiative Decay of SN1987A Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.62(1989) 505

    1989

  194. [206]

    Oberauer, C

    L. Oberauer, C. Hagner, G. Raffelt and E. Rieger,Supernova bounds on neutrino radiative decays,Astropart. Phys.1(1993) 377

    1993

  195. [207]

    Manzari, Y

    C.A. Manzari, Y. Park, B.R. Safdi and I. Savoray,Supernova Axions Convert to Gamma Rays in Magnetic Fields of Progenitor Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 211002 [2405.19393]

    2024

  196. [208]

    Graur, F.B

    O. Graur, F.B. Bianco, M. Modjaz, I. Shivvers, A.V. Filippenko, W. Li et al.,LOSS Revisited. II. The Relative Rates of Different Types of Supernovae Vary between Low- and High-mass Galaxies,Astrophys. J.837(2017) 121 [1609.02923]. – 56 –

    2017 arXiv

  197. [209]

    X. Ma, X. Wang, J. Mo, D.A. Howell, C. Pellegrino, J. Zhang et al.,Supernovae at distances <40Mpc: I. Catalogues and fractions of supernovae in a complete sample,Astron. Astrophys. 698(2025) A305 [2504.04393]

    2025 arXiv

  198. [210]

    Cand´ on, D.F.G

    F.R. Cand´ on, D.F.G. Fiorillo, ´A. Gil Muyor, H.-T. Janka, G.G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano, Stripped-Envelope Supernovae for QCD Axion Detection,2511.13815

    arXiv

  199. [211]

    Tauris, N

    T.M. Tauris, N. Langer and P. Podsiadlowski,Ultra-stripped supernovae: progenitors and fate, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.451(2015) 2123 [1505.00270]

    2015 arXiv

  200. [212]

    de la Chevroti` ere, N

    A. de la Chevroti` ere, N. St-Louis, A.F.J. Moffat and MiMeS Collaboration,Searching for Magnetic Fields in 11 Wolf-Rayet Stars: Analysis of Circular Polarization Measurements from ESPaDOnS,Astrophys. J.781(2014) 73

    2014

  201. [213]

    Hubrig, K

    S. Hubrig, K. Scholz, W.-R. Hamann, M. Sch¨ oller, R. Ignace, I. Ilyin et al.,Searching for a magnetic field in Wolf-Rayet stars using FORS 2 spectropolarimetry,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.458(2016) 3381 [1603.01441]

    2016 arXiv

  202. [214]

    Hubrig, M

    S. Hubrig, M. Sch¨ oller, A. Cikota and S.P. J¨ arvinen,The search for magnetic fields in two Wolf-Rayet stars and the discovery of a variable magnetic field in WR 55,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.499(2020) L116 [2010.00983]

    2020 arXiv

  203. [215]

    J¨ arvinen, S

    S.P. J¨ arvinen, S. Hubrig, R. Jayaraman, A. Cikota and M. Sch¨ oller,The magnetic, spectroscopic, and photometric variability of the Wolf-Rayet star WR 55,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.524(2023) L21 [2306.05038]

    2023 arXiv

  204. [216]

    Shenar et al.,A massive helium star with a sufficiently strong magnetic field to form a magnetar,Science381(2023) 761 [2308.08591]

    T. Shenar et al.,A massive helium star with a sufficiently strong magnetic field to form a magnetar,Science381(2023) 761 [2308.08591]

    2023 arXiv

  205. [217]

    Kleiser et al.,Peculiar Type II Supernovae from Blue Supergiants,Mon

    I.K.W. Kleiser et al.,Peculiar Type II Supernovae from Blue Supergiants,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.415(2011) 372 [1101.1298]

    2011 arXiv

  206. [218]

    Pessi, D.D

    T. Pessi, D.D. Desai, J.L. Prieto, C.S. Kochanek, B.J. Shappee, J.P. Anderson et al., Supernova rates and luminosity functions from ASAS-SN II: 2014–2017 core-collapse supernovae and their subtypes,2508.10985. [219]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,GW170817: Observation of G...

    2014

  207. [223]

    Fiorillo and F

    D.F.G. Fiorillo and F. Iocco,Axions from neutron star mergers,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 123007

    2022

  208. [224]

    Lecce, A

    F. Lecce, A. Lella, G. Lucente, V. Vijayan, A. Bauswein, M. Giannotti et al.,Probing axionlike particles with multimessenger observations of neutron star mergers,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 023001 [2504.02032]

    2025 arXiv

  209. [225]

    Lecce, A

    F. Lecce, A. Lella, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi,Detecting light axions from supernovae in nearby galaxies,2512.04185

  210. [226]

    Abe et al.,Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment — Detector Design and Physics Potential —,1109.3262

    K. Abe et al.,Letter of Intent: The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment — Detector Design and Physics Potential —,1109.3262. [227]Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,1805.04163

    arXiv

  211. [228]

    Cavan-Piton, D

    M. Cavan-Piton, D. Guadagnoli, A. Iohner, P. Fernandez-Menendez and L. Vittorio,Probing the general axion-nucleon interaction in water Cherenkov experiments,JHEP07(2025) 070 [2503.17490]

    2025 arXiv

  212. [229]

    Lucente, L

    G. Lucente, L. Mastrototaro, P. Carenza, L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi,Axion signatures from supernova explosions through the nucleon electric-dipole portal,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 123020 [2203.15812]

    2022 arXiv

  213. [230]

    Raffelt,Astrophysical methods to constrain axions and other novel particle phenomena, Phys

    G.G. Raffelt,Astrophysical methods to constrain axions and other novel particle phenomena, Phys. Rept.198(1990) 1

    1990

  214. [231]

    Georgi, D.B

    H. Georgi, D.B. Kaplan and L. Randall,Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low-energies, Phys. Lett. B169(1986) 73

    1986

  215. [232]

    Bionta et al.,Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud,Phys

    R.M. Bionta et al.,Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1494. [233]IMBcollaboration,Angular Distribution of Events From Sn1987a,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3361. [234]Kamiokande-IIcollaboration,O...

    1987

  216. [235]

    Hirata et al.,Observation in the Kamiokande-II Detector of the Neutrino Burst from Supernova SN 1987a,Phys

    K.S. Hirata et al.,Observation in the Kamiokande-II Detector of the Neutrino Burst from Supernova SN 1987a,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 448

    1988

  217. [236]

    Alekseev, L.N

    E.N. Alekseev, L.N. Alekseeva, V.I. Volchenko and I.V. Krivosheina,Possible Detection of a Neutrino Signal on 23 February 1987 at the Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope of the Institute of Nuclear Research,JETP Lett.45(1987) 589

    1987

  218. [237]

    Alekseev, L.N

    E.N. Alekseev, L.N. Alekseeva, I.V. Krivosheina and V.I. Volchenko,Detection of the Neutrino Signal From SN1987A in the LMC Using the Inr Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 209

    1988

  219. [238]

    Hempel and J

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich,Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State,Nucl. Phys. A837(2010) 210 [0911.4073]

    2010 arXiv

  220. [239]

    Steiner, M

    A.W. Steiner, M. Hempel and T. Fischer,Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations,Astrophys. J.774(2013) 17 [1207.2184]

    2013 arXiv

  221. [240]

    Cavan-Piton, D

    M. Cavan-Piton, D. Guadagnoli, M. Oertel, H. Seong and L. Vittorio,Axion Emission from Strange Matter in Core-Collapse SNe,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 121002 [2401.10979]

    2024 arXiv

  222. [241]

    Autiero, B

    D. Autiero, B. Beltr´ an, J.M. Carmona, S. Cebri´ an, E. Chesi, M. Davenport et al.,The cast time projection chamber,New Journal of Physics9(2007) 171

    2007

  223. [242]

    Abbon, S

    P. Abbon, S. Andriamonje, S. Aune, T. Dafni, M. Davenport, E. Delagnes et al.,The micromegas detector of the cast experiment,New Journal of Physics9(2007) 170. – 58 –

    2007

  224. [243]

    Kuster, H

    M. Kuster, H. Br¨ auninger, S. Cebri´ an, M. Davenport, C. Eleftheriadis, J. Englhauser et al., The x-ray telescope of cast,New Journal of Physics9(2007) 169

    2007

  225. [244]

    Krieger, J

    C. Krieger, J. Kaminski, M. Lupberger and K. Desch,A gridpix-based x-ray detector for the cast experiment,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment867(2017) 101

    2017

  226. [245]

    van Bibber, P.M

    K. van Bibber, P.M. McIntyre, D.E. Morris and G.G. Raffelt,Design for a practical laboratory detector for solar axions,Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 2089. [246]CAST Collaborationcollaboration,New solar axion search using the cern axion solar telescope with 4Hefilling,Phys. Rev. D92(201...

    1989

  227. [249]

    Ruz,Determination of effective axion masses in the helium-3 buffer of cast, in2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, pp

    J. Ruz,Determination of effective axion masses in the helium-3 buffer of cast, in2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, pp. 135–140, 2011, DOI

    2011

  228. [250]

    Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles(5, 1996)

    G.G. Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles(5, 1996)

    1996

  229. [251]

    Abeln, K

    A. Abeln, K. Altenm¨ uller, S. Arguedas Cuendis, E. Armengaud, D. Atti´ e, S. Aune et al., Conceptual design of babyiaxo, the intermediate stage towards the international axion observatory,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2021) 137

    2021

  230. [252]

    Armengaud, D

    E. Armengaud, D. Atti´ e, S. Basso, P. Brun, N. Bykovskiy, J. Carmona et al.,Physics potential of the international axion observatory (iaxo),Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(2019) 047

    2019

  231. [253]

    Ahyoune, K

    S. Ahyoune, K. Altenm¨ uller, I. Antol ´ ın, S. Basso, P. Brun, F.R. Cand´ on et al.,An accurate solar axions ray-tracing response of babyiaxo,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(2025) 159

    2025

  232. [254]

    Dafni, C.A.J

    T. Dafni, C.A.J. O’Hare, B. Laki´ c, J. Gal´ an, F.J. Iguaz, I.G. Irastorza et al.,Weighing the solar axion,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 035037

    2019

  233. [255]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1 [2003.01100]. [256]CASTcollaboration,New Upper Limit on the Axion-Photon Coupling with an Extended CAST Run with a Xe-Based Micromegas Detector,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(20...

    2020 arXiv

  234. [257]

    Quiskamp, B.T

    A. Quiskamp, B.T. McAllister, P. Altin, E.N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev and M.E. Tobar, Exclusion of Axionlike-Particle Cogenesis Dark Matter in a Mass Window above 100µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 031601 [2310.00904]

    2024 arXiv

  235. [258]

    McAllister, A.P

    B.T. McAllister, A.P. Quiskamp and M.E. Tobar,Tunable rectangular resonant cavities for axion haloscopes,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015013 [2309.12098]

    2024 arXiv

  236. [259]

    Day, H.G

    P.K. Day, H.G. LeDuc, B.A. Mazin, A. Vayonakis and J. Zmuidzinas,A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays,Nature425(2003) 817

    2003

  237. [260]

    Rollano, A.P

    V. Rollano, A.P. Laguna, D. Rodriguez, M. Calvo, M.T. Magaz, D. Granados et al.,Dark characterization of ti/al lekids for the search of axions in the w-band,arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01913(2025) . [261]BREADcollaboration,Broadband Solenoidal Haloscope for Terahertz Axion Detec...

    2025

  238. [262]

    Bajjali et al.,First results from BRASS-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter,JCAP08(2023) 077 [2306.05934]

    F. Bajjali et al.,First results from BRASS-p broadband searches for hidden photon dark matter,JCAP08(2023) 077 [2306.05934]

    2023 arXiv

  239. [263]

    De Miguel,A dark matter telescope probing the 6 to 60 GHz band,JCAP04(2021) 075 [2003.06874]

    J. De Miguel,A dark matter telescope probing the 6 to 60 GHz band,JCAP04(2021) 075 [2003.06874]

    2021 arXiv

  240. [264]

    Qiu et al.,Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2D MnBi 2Te4,Nature641(2025) 62 [2504.12572]

    J.-X. Qiu et al.,Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2D MnBi 2Te4,Nature641(2025) 62 [2504.12572]

    2025 arXiv

  241. [265]

    Wilczek,Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Two Applications of Axion Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1799

    1987

  242. [266]

    R. Li, J. Wang, X. Qi and S.-C. Zhang,Dynamical Axion Field in Topological Magnetic Insulators,Nature Phys.6(2010) 284 [0908.1537]

    2010 arXiv

  243. [267]

    Zhang, D

    J. Zhang, D. Wang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, H. Zhang and J. Wang,Large dynamical axion field in topological antiferromagnetic insulator mn2bi2te5,Chinese Physics Letters37(2020) 077304

    2020

  244. [268]

    X.-L. Qi, T.L. Hughes and S.-C. Zhang,Topological field theory of time-reversal invariant insulators,Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics78(2008) 195424

    2008

  245. [269]

    Essin, J.E

    A.M. Essin, J.E. Moore and D. Vanderbilt,Magnetoelectric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crystalline insulators,Physical review letters102(2009) 146805

    2009

  246. [270]

    Nenno, C.A

    D.M. Nenno, C.A. Garcia, J. Gooth, C. Felser and P. Narang,Axion physics in condensed-matter systems,Nature Reviews Physics2(2020) 682

    2020

  247. [271]

    Sekine and K

    A. Sekine and K. Nomura,Axion electrodynamics in topological materials,Journal of Applied Physics129(2021)

    2021

  248. [272]

    Otrokov, I.I

    M.M. Otrokov, I.I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, D. Estyunin, A. Zeugner, Z.S. Aliev et al., Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator,Nature576(2019) 416

    2019

  249. [273]

    Hofmann,Spin wave scattering in the effective Lagrangian perspective,Phys

    C.P. Hofmann,Spin wave scattering in the effective Lagrangian perspective,Phys. Rev. B60 (1999) 388 [cond-mat/9805277]

    1999 arXiv

  250. [274]

    Sch¨ utte-Engel, D.J.E

    J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, D.J.E. Marsh, A.J. Millar, A. Sekine, F. Chadha-Day, S. Hoof et al.,Axion quasiparticles for axion dark matter detection,JCAP08(2021) 066 [2102.05366]

    2021 arXiv

  251. [275]

    Kakhidze and I.V

    A.I. Kakhidze and I.V. Kolokolov,Antiferromagnetic axions detector,Sov. Phys. JETP72 (1991) 598

    1991

  252. [276]

    Barbieri, C

    R. Barbieri, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, C.S. Gallo, A. Lombardi, A. Ortolan et al.,Searching for galactic axions through magnetized media: the QUAX proposal,Phys. Dark Univ.15 (2017) 135 [1606.02201]

    2017 arXiv

  253. [277]

    Marsh, K.-C

    D.J.E. Marsh, K.-C. Fong, E.W. Lentz, L. Smejkal and M.N. Ali,Proposal to Detect Dark Matter using Axionic Topological Antiferromagnets,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 121601 [1807.08810]

    2019 arXiv

  254. [278]

    Chigusa, T

    S. Chigusa, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama,Axion/hidden-photon dark matter conversion into condensed matter axion,JHEP08(2021) 074 [2102.06179]

    2021 arXiv

  255. [279]

    Millar, G.G

    A.J. Millar, G.G. Raffelt, J. Redondo and F.D. Steffen,Dielectric Haloscopes to Search for Axion Dark Matter: Theoretical Foundations,JCAP01(2017) 061 [1612.07057]

    2017 arXiv

  256. [280]

    Bayrakci, D.A

    S.P. Bayrakci, D.A. Tennant, P. Leininger, T. Keller, M.C.R. Gibson, S.D. Wilson et al., Lifetimes of antiferromagnetic magnons in two and three dimensions: Experiment, theory, and numerics,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 017204

    2013

  257. [281]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits.” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3932430. – 60 –

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.