pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.22549 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-23 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production in differently polarized electric fields with the frequency chirping

Abhinav Jangir , Anees Ahmed This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords Schwinger pair productionfrequency chirpelectric field polarizationdynamically assistedDirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalismmomentum distributionnumber densitytwo-color fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

Frequency chirps applied to polarized electric fields boost dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production by two to three orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how frequency chirps in electric fields with varying polarizations influence the creation of electron-positron pairs via the Schwinger mechanism, focusing on dynamically assisted configurations that combine strong and weak fields. It shows that introducing large chirps to both fields produces strong interference patterns that raise the peak values in the momentum distribution of created pairs. The analysis finds that the total number density of pairs rises by two to three orders of magnitude under these conditions. It further reports that the dependence of the yield on field polarization weakens steadily as the chirp parameter grows, for both single-color and two-color fields. Optimal values of chirp and polarization are identified that maximize the pair yield within given field constraints.

Core claim

In the dynamically assisted case, the number density can be enhanced significantly over 2-3 orders when large frequency chirps are applied to both strong and weak fields. Frequency chirps lead to strong interference effects and significantly enhanced the peak values in the momentum distribution. Sensitivity of the number density to field polarization progressively diminishes as the chirp parameter increases, a trend that holds for both one-color field and the assisted two-color combined fields.

What carries the argument

The frequency chirp parameter acting on differently polarized one-color and two-color electric fields, tracked through the real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism to compute momentum distributions and total pair number density.

If this is right

  • Large chirps on both strong and weak fields raise the pair number density by two to three orders of magnitude.
  • Interference from chirps produces higher peaks in the momentum spectrum of created pairs.
  • Polarization dependence of the yield drops as the chirp parameter is increased.
  • Specific optimal combinations of chirp and polarization parameters maximize the pair yield.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reduced sensitivity to polarization at high chirps could allow simpler field geometries in future setups without major loss of yield.
  • The identified optimal chirp values suggest a route to tuning laser parameters for higher pair yields under fixed intensity limits.
  • The same chirp mechanism might extend to other assisted production channels such as those involving magnetic fields or time-varying backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism remains accurate for the chosen chirped and polarized field configurations without unaccounted higher-order effects.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental measurement of pair number density for large chirp parameters in a two-color assisted setup that fails to show an increase of at least two orders of magnitude would falsify the central enhancement claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.22549 by Abhinav Jangir, Anees Ahmed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Electric field configuration described by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Chirp-free case ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows the number density of the created parti￾cles in presence of the one-color strong field E1s as a func￾tion of field polarization δ, and variation in chirp values of b1. We observe that the number density exhibits a clear maxima at linear polarization (δ = 0) and a monotonic suppression as |δ| is increased, for all values of b1. This behavior reflects the fact that the tunneling amplitude is lowered as… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Chirp applied to the strong field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The number destiny (in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Chirp applied to the weak field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Momentum distribution of the created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Chirp applied to both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the enhanced dynamically assisted electron-positron pair production in differently polarized electric fields with frequency chirps within the real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism. The combined influence of the chirp parameter and the field polarization on the momentum distribution and the total number density of the created pairs is studied in detail for one-color field as well as dynamically assisted two-color combined fields. The frequency chirps lead to strong interference effects and significantly enhanced the peak values in the momentum distribution. In the dynamically assisted case, the number density can be enhanced significantly over 2-3 orders when large frequency chirps are applied to both strong and weak fields. Furthermore, we observe that sensitivity of the number density to field polarization progressively diminishes as the chirp parameter increases, a trend that holds for both one-color field and the assisted two-color combined fields. From our analysis, we identify optimal chirp and polarization values that yield maximal enhancement in dynamically assisted fields in different settings. These results provide a valuable foundation for the optimal control of pair production, offering guidance for maximizing particle yield within a constrained set of field parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates enhanced dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production in one-color and two-color electric fields with differing polarizations and frequency chirps, using the real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism. It reports strong interference effects that enhance peak values in the momentum distribution, a 2-3 order-of-magnitude increase in total pair number density for large chirps applied to both strong and weak fields in the assisted case, and a progressive reduction in sensitivity of the density to field polarization as the chirp parameter grows. Optimal chirp and polarization values for maximal enhancement are identified.

Significance. If the numerical outputs prove robust under refinement, the work supplies concrete guidance on chirp-assisted optimization of pair yields within constrained field parameters, extending prior studies of dynamically assisted production to polarized and chirped configurations. The systematic mapping of chirp-polarization interplay offers a practical foundation for experimental control strategies in strong-field QED.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results] Results section (and associated figures on number density vs. chirp): the central claim of 2-3 orders of magnitude enhancement for large chirps rests on integrated DHW output without reported convergence tests on momentum grid spacing, time step, or artificial viscosity. For stiff oscillations induced by rapid frequency variation, the integrated density n = ∫ d³p f(p) can shift by factors of 10-100 under refinement, directly undermining the quantitative enhancement factor.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: numerical outcomes are stated without error bars, convergence metrics, or explicit checks against known analytic limits (e.g., constant-field or monochromatic cases).
  2. [Formalism] Notation: the precise definition of the chirp parameter and its insertion into the vector potential A(t) for each polarization component should be written explicitly in the formalism section to allow direct reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and agree that explicit numerical convergence tests should be reported to support the quantitative claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section (and associated figures on number density vs. chirp): the central claim of 2-3 orders of magnitude enhancement for large chirps rests on integrated DHW output without reported convergence tests on momentum grid spacing, time step, or artificial viscosity. For stiff oscillations induced by rapid frequency variation, the integrated density n = ∫ d³p f(p) can shift by factors of 10-100 under refinement, directly undermining the quantitative enhancement factor.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that convergence tests are essential for validating the numerical results, particularly given the stiff dynamics introduced by frequency chirps in the DHW formalism. This was an omission in the original manuscript. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) presenting systematic convergence studies with respect to momentum grid spacing (Δp), time step (Δt), and artificial viscosity. We have performed these tests and find that the total pair number density converges to within ~10% upon refinement (e.g., halving Δp and Δt), and the reported 2–3 order-of-magnitude enhancement factor remains stable. We will include representative plots or tables demonstrating this robustness for both one-color and assisted two-color cases. This addition will directly address the concern and strengthen the quantitative reliability of the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical output from DHW equations

full rationale

The paper computes pair number density and momentum distributions by numerically integrating the real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner equations for given time-dependent vector potentials A(t) that incorporate chirp and polarization. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the output data and then re-labeled as a prediction; no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present derivation depends upon; the reported 2-3 order enhancement is an explicit integral over the solved Wigner function and does not reduce to any input quantity by algebraic identity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; ledger entries are inferred at the level of the stated computational framework.

free parameters (1)
  • chirp parameter
    Varied across simulations to produce the reported interference and enhancement effects.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism accurately models pair production in time-dependent polarized fields
    Explicitly adopted as the computational method in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5493 in / 1123 out tokens · 48387 ms · 2026-05-15T00:11:04.198415+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    As the chirp valueb 1 increases, these fringes exhibit smeariness along thek x direction, and the peak momen- tum distribution value rises, similar toδ= 0 case in Fig

    work page

  2. [2]

    In this case, the chirp mainly increases the peak momentum distribution value while preserving the overall spectrum structure

    Forδ= 0.2 and 0.5, the distribution shifts toward positivek y region, signaling the onset of the transverse momentum transfer due to the rotating field vector. In this case, the chirp mainly increases the peak momentum distribution value while preserving the overall spectrum structure. In the circularly polarized limitδ= 1, the mo- mentum distribution for...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Sauter, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik69, 742 (1931)

    F. Sauter, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik69, 742 (1931)

    work page 1931

  4. [4]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik98, 714 (1936)

    work page 1936

  5. [5]

    Schwinger, Phys

    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  6. [6]

    Marklund and J

    M. Marklund and J. Lundin, The European Physical Journal D55, 319 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    O. Pike, F. Mackenroth, E. Hill, and S. Rose, Nature Photonics8, 434 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Yanovsky, V

    V. Yanovsky, V. Chvykov, G. Kalinchenko, P. Rousseau, T. Planchon, T. Matsuoka, A. Maksimchuk, J. Nees, G. Cheriaux, G. Mourou,et al., Optics Express16, 2109 (2008). 18 FIG. 16: Chirp applied to bothE 1s andE 2w. (a) The number density (in units ofm 3) of created particles as a function of the field polarizationδfor the two-color combined fieldE=E 1s +E 2...

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Ringwald, Physics Letters B510, 107 (2001)

    A. Ringwald, Physics Letters B510, 107 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    https://www.eli-laser.eu/

    work page

  11. [11]

    https://www.xfel.eu/

    work page

  12. [12]

    Di Piazza, C

    A. Di Piazza, C. M¨ uller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1177 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Physics Reports1010, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Gies and K

    H. Gies and K. Klingm¨ uller, Phys. Rev. D72, 065001 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    G. V. Dunne, Q.-h. Wang, H. Gies, and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D73, 065028 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Schneider and R

    C. Schneider and R. Sch¨ utzhold, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, Phys. Rev. D84, 125023 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    G. V. DUNNE, Heisenberg-euler effective lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom Fields to Strings: Cir- cumnavigating Theoretical Physics(2005) pp. 445–522

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Kluger, E

    Y. Kluger, E. Mottola, and J. M. Eisenberg, Phys. Rev. D58, 125015 (1998)

    work page 1998

  20. [20]

    S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D84, 125028 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    A. Huet, S. P. Kim, and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D90, 125033 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Schmidt, D

    S. Schmidt, D. Blaschke, G. R¨ opke, S. Smolyansky, A. Prozorkevich, and V. Toneev, International Journal of Modern Physics E7, 709 (1998)

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Alkofer, M

    R. Alkofer, M. B. Hecht, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, and D. V. Vinnik, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 193902 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Nuriman, B.-S

    A. Nuriman, B.-S. Xie, Z.-L. Li, and D. Sayipjamal, Physics Letters B717, 465 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Abdukerim, Z.-L

    N. Abdukerim, Z.-L. Li, and B.-S. Xie, Physics Letters B726, 820 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    C. K. Dumlu, Phys. Rev. D82, 045007 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Marinov and V

    M. Marinov and V. Popov, Fortschritte der Physik25, 373 (1977)

    work page 1977

  28. [28]

    C. K. Dumlu, Phys. Rev. D79, 065027 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    J. W. Braun, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Phys. Rev. A59, 604 (1999)

    work page 1999

  30. [30]

    Krekora, Q

    P. Krekora, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 040406 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Tang, B.-S

    S. Tang, B.-S. Xie, D. Lu, H.-Y. Wang, L.-B. Fu, and J. Liu, Phys. Rev. A88, 012106 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Z. L. Li, C. Gong, and Y. J. Li, Phys. Rev. D103, 116018 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    M¨ uller, A

    C. M¨ uller, A. B. Voitkiv, and N. Gr¨ un, Phys. Rev. A67, 063407 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    M¨ uller, A

    C. M¨ uller, A. B. Voitkiv, and N. Gr¨ un, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 223601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Deneke and C

    C. Deneke and C. M¨ uller, Phys. Rev. A78, 033431 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    He, B.-S

    L.-Y. He, B.-S. Xie, X.-H. Guo, and H.-Y. Wang, Com- munications in Theoretical Physics58, 863 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    Blinne and H

    A. Blinne and H. Gies, Phys. Rev. D89, 085001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Z. L. Li, D. Lu, and B. S. Xie, Phys. Rev. D92, 085001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Z. Li, D. Lu, B. Xie, B. Shen, L. Fu, and J. Liu, Euro- physics Letters110, 51001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Hebenstreit, R

    F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, G. V. Dunne, and H. Gies, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 150404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Hebenstreit, R

    F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, and H. Gies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 180403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Kohlf¨ urst and R

    C. Kohlf¨ urst and R. Alkofer, Phys. Rev. D97, 036026 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Kohlf¨ urst and R

    C. Kohlf¨ urst and R. Alkofer, Physics Letters B756, 371 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    I. A. Aleksandrov, G. Plunien, and V. M. Shabaev, Phys. Rev. D94, 065024 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Olugh, Z.-L

    O. Olugh, Z.-L. Li, B.-S. Xie, and R. Alkofer, Phys. Rev. D99, 036003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Ababekri, B.-S

    M. Ababekri, B.-S. Xie, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D100, 016003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Q. Z. Lv, S. Dong, Y. T. Li, Z. M. Sheng, Q. Su, and 19 R. Grobe, Phys. Rev. A97, 022515 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Sch¨ utzhold, H

    R. Sch¨ utzhold, H. Gies, and G. Dunne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130404 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    M. F. Linder, C. Schneider, J. Sicking, N. Szpak, and R. Sch¨ utzhold, Phys. Rev. D92, 085009 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Orthaber, F

    M. Orthaber, F. Hebenstreit, and R. Alkofer, Physics Letters B698, 80 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    L.-J. Li, M. Mohamedsedik, and B.-S. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036015 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Olugh, Z

    O. Olugh, Z. Li, and B. Xie, Physics Letters B802, 135259 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    J. Braß, D. Muller, S. Villalba-Ch’avez, K. Krajewska, and C. Muller (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Z.-Y. Chen, O. Amat, J.-h. Bai, and M. A. Bake, Phys. Rev. D111, 116005 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Ababekri, S

    M. Ababekri, S. Dulat, B. Xie, and J. Zhang, Physics Letters B810, 135815 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Hofmann, A

    C. Hofmann, A. S. Landsman, C. Cirelli, A. N. Pfeiffer, and U. Keller, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 125601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Hofmann, A

    C. Hofmann, A. S. Landsman, A. Zielinski, C. Cirelli, T. Zimmermann, A. Scrinzi, and U. Keller, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043406 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    A. N. Pfeiffer, C. Cirelli, M. Smolarski, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-Samha, L. B. Madsen, and U. Keller, Nature Physics8, 76 (2012)

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    K. Wang, X. Hu, S. Dulat, and B.-S. Xie, Chinese Physics B30, 060204 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Olugh, Z.-L

    O. Olugh, Z.-L. Li, and B.-S. Xie, High Power Laser Sci- ence and Engineering8, e38 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    J. C. R. Bloch, V. A. Mizerny, A. V. Prozorkevich, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, S. A. Smolyansky, and D. V. Vinnik, Phys. Rev. D60, 116011 (1999)

    work page 1999

  62. [62]

    Tanji, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    N. Tanji, Annals of Physics324, 1691 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    R. Z. Jiang, C. Gong, Z. L. Li, and Y. J. Li, Phys. Rev. D108, 076015 (2023)

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Keldysh, Sov

    L. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1307 (1965)

    work page 1965

  65. [65]

    Brezin and C

    E. Brezin and C. Itzykson, Phys. Rev. D2, 1191 (1970)

    work page 1970

  66. [66]

    D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. W. Weidemann, C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. J. Boege, T. Koffas, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, D. A. Reis, and W. Ragg, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 1626 (1997)

    work page 1997

  67. [67]

    Bamber, S

    C. Bamber, S. J. Boege, T. Koffas, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, D. A. Reis, W. Ragg, C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, and A. W. Weidemann, Phys. Rev. D60, 092004 (1999)

    work page 1999

  68. [68]

    Kohlf¨ urst, H

    C. Kohlf¨ urst, H. Gies, and R. Alkofer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 050402 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    G. R. Mocken, M. Ruf, C. M¨ uller, and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. A81, 022122 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Bialynicki-Birula, P

    I. Bialynicki-Birula, P. G´ ornicki, and J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. D44, 1825 (1991)

    work page 1991

  71. [71]

    Hebenstreit, R

    F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, and H. Gies, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105026 (2010)

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    Electron-positron pair production in inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields

    C. Kohlf¨ urst,Electron–positron pair production in in- homogeneous electromagnetic fields, Ph.D. thesis, Karl- Franzens-Universit¨ at Graz (2015), arXiv:1512.06082 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous electric fields

    F. Hebenstreit,Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous elec- tric fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Graz (2011), arXiv:1106.5965 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  74. [74]

    Blinne and E

    A. Blinne and E. Strobel, Phys. Rev. D93, 025014 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Electron Positron Pair Production in Strong Electric Fields

    A. Blinne,Electron Positron Pair Production in Strong Electric Fields, Ph.D. thesis, arXiv (2017), arXiv:1701.00743 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    I. A. Aleksandrov, G. Plunien, and V. M. Shabaev, Phys. Rev. D97, 116001 (2018)

    work page 2018