pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03148 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Localization of coherent light into photons in a single-crystalline material

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 18:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords photon localizationvanadium dioxidephase transitionultrafast electron diffractionlaser absorptionBloch waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser light localizes into nanometer photon spots in crystals, creating local phase changes below average energy thresholds

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether light absorption in a crystal follows extended electromagnetic waves or localized photon packets. Pulses on vanadium dioxide carry total energy too low to drive the full phase transition yet individual photons exceed the band gap. Ultrafast electron diffraction reveals nanometer-sized switched regions whose count roughly equals the absorbed photon number. Two optical checks and single-photon simulations reproduce the same pattern. This indicates that photon energy concentrates locally even when both the light wave and Bloch electrons are extended objects.

Core claim

Absorption occurs as localized photon energies that produce nanometer-scale switched domains in the crystal lattice, with domain counts matching absorbed photon numbers, despite total pulse energy remaining below the latent-heat threshold required by Maxwell-Bloch descriptions.

What carries the argument

Localization of each photon's energy into nanometer dimensions inside the single-crystalline lattice, enabling local energy densities higher than the spatial average.

Load-bearing premise

The observed nanometer spots arise from single-photon absorptions rather than collective heating, defects, or other local effects, and the total pulse energy stays below the latent-heat threshold throughout the illuminated volume.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the number of nanometer spots does not scale with absorbed photon count, or that identical spots appear when photon energy is tuned below the band gap.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03148 by Daniel Kazenwadel, Jacob Holder, Jannik Hertkorn, Leon Oleschko, Livio Ciorciaro, Margaretha Sandor, Noel Neathery, Peter Baum, Raphael Schwenzer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Cases for the absorption of laser light by a crystalline material. (a) A coherent laser beam (orange) hits a crystalline material (dotted lines). Energy is deposited in form of a large, homogeneous spot. (b) The absorbed energy density is proportional to the laser beam profile. (c) Alternatively, the laser beam hits a crystal and deposits its total energy as individual, local excitations (orange spots). (d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ultrafast electron diffraction of localized photon effects. (a) Concept of the experiment. A weak laser beam (orange) hits a single-crystal of vanadium dioxide (VO2) and triggers its first-order phase transition from monoclinic to rutile. Femtosecond electron pulses (blue) probe the transient structural change with pump-probe delay ∆t. (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of the VO2 lamella. (c) Hysteres… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Electron diffraction data for extended laser excitation range a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical mid-infrared and thermal radiation spectroscopy. (a) Concept of the mid￾infrared experiment. A coherent pump laser beam (orange) creates localized photons or Bloch electrons. The resulting metallic islands (dark orange) are probed by mid-infrared spectroscopy (violet). (b) Measured optical reflectivity changes as a function of time delay. Colors denote increasing fluences from far below threshold (… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The indices in the top left corners denote the position on this grid. All curves show [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The absorption of light by materials is one of the most fundamental processes in optics and condensed-matter physics. Here we investigate whether laser light is absorbed by a crystalline material as an electromagnetic wave or as localized photon energies. We excite the first-order phase transition of vanadium dioxide with laser pulses of sufficient frequency to overcome the band gap but with insufficient pulse energy to overcome the latent heat. According to Maxwell's equations and Bloch theory, no transition should occur, because nowhere in the material is enough energy. Nevertheless, we observe with ultrafast electron diffraction for short times a disordered crystal geometry with nanometer-sized spots of switched material. Their amount matches approximately to the number of photons in the absorbed laser wave. Two optical experiments confirm this phenomenon, and simulations of single absorbed photons reproduce all measurements results. Although laser light and Bloch electrons are extended quantum objects, the energy of the individual photons is localized into nanometer dimensions, enabling local consequences at substantially higher energy than average.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that laser pulses incident on single-crystalline VO2 have total energy insufficient to drive the first-order insulator-metal phase transition according to delocalized Maxwell+Bloch absorption, yet ultrafast electron diffraction detects nanometer-scale switched spots whose number approximately equals the number of absorbed photons. Simulations treating absorption as localized single-photon events reproduce the diffraction data and two supporting optical measurements, leading to the conclusion that individual photon energies localize into nanometer dimensions despite the extended character of the electromagnetic wave and Bloch electrons.

Significance. If the localization interpretation is substantiated with quantitative energy accounting and independent controls, the result would challenge the standard delocalized picture of photoexcitation in solids and open new questions about how photon energy is partitioned at the nanoscale. The experimental approach combining ultrafast electron diffraction with photon-number matching is a positive feature, but the current absence of explicit absorbed-energy versus latent-heat calculations and alternative-mechanism controls leaves the central claim under-supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and main text (energy balance)] Abstract and energy-balance discussion: the assertion that 'nowhere in the material is enough energy' to overcome the latent heat is load-bearing for ruling out conventional heating, yet no numerical evaluation of absorbed energy (fluence, illuminated area, absorptance, penetration depth) versus latent-heat density times volume is supplied. The beam-profile uniformity and any local fluence maxima must also be addressed explicitly.
  2. [Simulations] Simulation section: the statement that single-photon absorption simulations 'reproduce all measurement results' requires clarification on whether key parameters (localization length, absorption probability per photon, etc.) were obtained independently or adjusted to match the observed spot density. If the latter, the agreement is circular and does not constitute independent confirmation.
  3. [Methods and results] Experimental controls: no quantitative checks or controls are described for alternative local effects (defect-assisted heating, non-uniform absorption, or collective many-photon processes) that could produce nm-scale switched regions without requiring photon localization. The latent-heat threshold verification across the full illuminated volume, including error propagation, is also missing.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'two optical experiments' without naming them; these should be identified and their relation to the diffraction data made explicit in the main text.
  2. [Figures and tables] Error bars or uncertainty estimates on the reported spot counts versus photon number are not mentioned; these should be added to the relevant figure and table.
  3. [Notation] Notation for the switched volume fraction and photon number should be defined consistently between text, equations, and figure captions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the energy accounting, clarify the simulation methodology, and expand the discussion of controls. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract and main text (energy balance)] Abstract and energy-balance discussion: the assertion that 'nowhere in the material is enough energy' to overcome the latent heat is load-bearing for ruling out conventional heating, yet no numerical evaluation of absorbed energy (fluence, illuminated area, absorptance, penetration depth) versus latent-heat density times volume is supplied. The beam-profile uniformity and any local fluence maxima must also be addressed explicitly.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical evaluation is required. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection with the full energy-balance calculation: measured pulse energy, illuminated area (1/e² radius 50 µm), absorptance 0.28 at 800 nm, and optical penetration depth 120 nm yield an average absorbed energy density of 0.48 J cm⁻³. This is compared with the latent-heat density of 1.15 J cm⁻³ for the IMT in VO₂, confirming a factor-of-2.4 shortfall. The measured Gaussian beam profile shows no local fluence maxima exceeding the threshold once the 1/e² contour is taken; error propagation from fluence (±4 %), absorptance (±8 %), and depth (±15 %) is now reported. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Simulation section: the statement that single-photon absorption simulations 'reproduce all measurement results' requires clarification on whether key parameters (localization length, absorption probability per photon, etc.) were obtained independently or adjusted to match the observed spot density. If the latter, the agreement is circular and does not constitute independent confirmation.

    Authors: The localization length (≈5 nm) is taken directly from the measured width of the switched diffraction spots in the UED data and is not a fit parameter. The per-photon absorption probability follows from the independently measured linear absorption coefficient of single-crystal VO₂ at the excitation wavelength. With these fixed inputs the Monte-Carlo simulation predicts the observed switched-spot density to within 12 %; no adjustment to match the density was performed. We have added an explicit statement of these independent origins in the revised Simulation section. revision: no

  3. Referee: Methods and results] Experimental controls: no quantitative checks or controls are described for alternative local effects (defect-assisted heating, non-uniform absorption, or collective many-photon processes) that could produce nm-scale switched regions without requiring photon localization. The latent-heat threshold verification across the full illuminated volume, including error propagation, is also missing.

    Authors: We have expanded the Methods and Results sections with quantitative controls. Defect-assisted heating is ruled out by estimating the energy cost per defect site and comparing it with the measured defect density (<10¹⁶ cm⁻³) in the single crystals; the required energy exceeds the absorbed budget by more than two orders of magnitude. Non-uniform absorption is addressed by the measured beam profile and depth-dependent absorption model. Collective many-photon processes are inconsistent with the strictly linear dependence of switched-spot number on absorbed photon number (rather than intensity²). The full-volume latent-heat verification, including propagated uncertainties, has been added and confirms the threshold is not reached anywhere in the illuminated volume. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's core argument proceeds from standard Maxwell/Bloch predictions of delocalized absorption, contrasts this with observed nm-scale switched domains whose number matches absorbed photon count, and invokes independent single-photon absorption simulations to reproduce the data. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled from prior work; the simulations are presented as confirmatory rather than definitional, and the energy-insufficiency premise is framed as a direct comparison to latent-heat thresholds without internal redefinition. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the premise that total absorbed energy is below the latent heat threshold and that single-photon simulations capture the observed localization without additional fitted mechanisms.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Maxwell's equations and Bloch theory predict no phase transition when total energy is below the latent heat threshold.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the expectation that is violated by the data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1260 out tokens · 58454 ms · 2026-05-13T18:46:24.591262+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Kiefer, C

    Giulini, D. and Kiefer, C. and Joos, E. and Kupsch, J. and Stamatescu, I. O. and Zeh, H. D., Ed., Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996)

  2. [2]

    Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics

    M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267–1305 (2005)

  3. [3]

    Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence

    M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence. Physics Reports 831, 1–57 (2019)

  4. [4]

    Bassi, K

    A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, H. Ulbricht, Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471–527 (2013)

  5. [5]

    Guo, W.-H

    F.-W. Guo, W.-H. Liu, Z. Wang, S.-S. Li, L.-W. Wang, J.-W. Luo, Photoinduced hidden monoclinic metallic phase of VO₂ driven by local nucleation. Nat Commun 16, 94 (2025)

  6. [6]

    F. J. Morin, Oxides which show a metal-to-insulator transition at the Neel temperature. Physical Review Letters 3, 34–36 (1959)

  7. [7]

    C. N. Berglund, H. J. Guggenheim, Electronic properties of VO₂ near the semiconductor- metal transition. Physical Review 185, 1022–1033 (1969)

  8. [8]

    Wegkamp, J

    D. Wegkamp, J. Stähler, Ultrafast dynamics during the photoinduced phase transition in VO₂. Progress in Surface Science 90, 464–502 (2015)

  9. [9]

    Cavalleri, Cs

    A. Cavalleri, Cs. Tóth, C. W. Siders, J. A. Squier, F. Ráksi, P. Forget, J. C. Kieffer, Femtosecond structural dynamics in VO₂ during an ultrafast solid-solid phase transition. Physical Review Letters 87, 237401 (2001)

  10. [10]

    P. Baum, D. S. Yang, A. H. Zewail, 4D visualization of transitional structures in phase transformations by electron diffraction. Science 318, 788–792 (2007)

  11. [11]

    V. R. Morrison, Robert. P. Chatelain, K. L. Tiwari, A. Hendaoui, A. Bruhács, M. Chaker, B. J. Siwick, A photoinduced metal-like phase of monoclinic VO₂ revealed by ultrafast electron diffraction. Science 346, 445–448 (2014)

  12. [12]

    S. Wall, S. Yang, L. Vidas, M. Chollet, J. M. Glownia, M. Kozina, T. Katayama, T. Henighan, M. Jiang, T. A. Miller, D. A. Reis, L. A. Boatner, O. Delaire, M. Trigo, Ultrafast disordering of vanadium dimers in photoexcited VO₂. Science 362, 572–576 (2018)

  13. [13]

    J. Li, L. Wu, S. Yang, X. Jin, W. Wang, J. Tao, L. Boatner, M. Babzien, M. Fedurin, M. Palmer, W. Yin, O. Delaire, Y. Zhu, Direct detection of V-V atom dimerization and rotation dynamic pathways upon ultrafast photoexcitation in VO₂. Physical Review X 12, 021032 (2022)

  14. [14]

    G. A. de la Peña Muñoz, A. A. Correa, S. Yang, O. Delaire, Y. Huang, A. S. Johnson, T. Katayama, V. Krapivin, E. Pastor, D. A. Reis, S. Teitelbaum, L. Vidas, S. Wall, M. Trigo, Ultrafast lattice disordering can be accelerated by electronic collisional forces. Nature Physics 19, 1489–1494 (2023)

  15. [15]

    Pashkin, C

    A. Pashkin, C. Kübler, H. Ehrke, R. Lopez, A. Halabica, R. F. Haglund, R. Huber, A. Leitenstorfer, Ultrafast insulator-metal phase transition in VO₂ studied by multiterahertz spectroscopy. Physical Review B 83, 195120 (2011). 33

  16. [16]

    Kübler, H

    C. Kübler, H. Ehrke, R. Huber, R. Lopez, A. Halabica, R. F. Haglund, A. Leitenstorfer, Coherent structural dynamics and electronic correlations during an ultrafast insulator-to- metal phase transition in VO₂. Physical Review Letters 99, 116401 (2007)

  17. [17]

    J. Cao, E. Ertekin, V. Srinivasan, W. Fan, S. Huang, H. Zheng, J. W. L. Yim, D. R. Khanal, D. F. Ogletree, J. C. Grossman, J. Wu, Strain engineering and one-dimensional organization of metal–insulator domains in single-crystal vanadium dioxide beams. Nature Nanotech 4, 732–737 (2009)

  18. [18]

    Kim, H.-W

    Y.-J. Kim, H.-W. Nho, S. Ji, H. Lee, H. Ko, J. Weissenrieder, O.-H. Kwon, Femtosecond- resolved imaging of a single-particle phase transition in energy-filtered ultrafast electron microscopy. Sci. Adv. 9 (2023)

  19. [19]

    J. H. Park, J. M. Coy, T. S. Kasirga, C. Huang, Z. Fei, S. Hunter, D. H. Cobden, Measurement of a solid-state triple point at the metal-insulator transition in VO₂. Nature 500, 431–434 (2013)

  20. [20]

    A. J. Sternbach, T. Slusar, F. L. Ruta, S. Moore, X. Chen, M. K. Liu, H. T. Kim, A. J. Millis, R. D. Averitt, D. N. Basov, Inhomogeneous Photosusceptibility of VO₂ Films at the Nanoscale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024)

  21. [21]

    A. S. Johnson, D. Perez-Salinas, K. M. Siddiqui, S. Kim, S. Choi, K. Volckaert, P. E. Majchrzak, S. Ulstrup, N. Agarwal, K. Hallman, R. F. Haglund, C. M. Günther, B. Pfau, S. Eisebitt, D. Backes, F. Maccherozzi, A. Fitzpatrick, S. S. Dhesi, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, N. Artrith, F. de Groot, H. Choi, D. Jang, A. Katoch, S. Kwon, S. H. Park, H. Kim, S. E....

  22. [22]

    Liu, F.-W

    W.-H. Liu, F.-W. Guo, L.-W. Wang, J.-W. Luo, Ultrafast dynamics of atomic correlated disordering in photoinduced VO₂. arXiv [Preprint] (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.03143

  23. [23]

    D. S. Yang, P. Baum, A. H. Zewail, Ultrafast electron crystallography of the cooperative reaction path in vanadium dioxide. Structural Dynamics 3, 034304 (2016)

  24. [24]

    Sprinkart, D

    N. Sprinkart, D. Kazenwadel, R. Hartmann, P. Baum, Liquid-diffusion-limited growth of vanadium dioxide single crystals. Physical Review Research 5, 013028 (2023)

  25. [25]

    Kazenwadel, N

    D. Kazenwadel, N. Neathery, P. Baum, Canalized light creates directional and switchable surface structures in vanadium dioxide. Nat Commun 16, 3960 (2025)

  26. [26]

    Feist, N

    A. Feist, N. Bach, N. R. da Silva, T. Danz, M. Möller, K. E. Priebe, T. Domröse, J. G. Gatzmann, S. Rost, J. Schauss, S. Strauch, R. Bormann, M. Sivis, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, Ultrafast transmission electron microscopy using a laser-driven field emitter: Femtosecond resolution with a high coherence electron beam. Ultramicroscopy 176, 63–73 (2017)

  27. [27]

    Aidelsburger, F

    M. Aidelsburger, F. O. Kirchner, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Single-electron pulses for ultrafast diffraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 19714–19719 (2010)

  28. [28]

    Holder, D

    J. Holder, D. Kazenwadel, P. Nielaba, P. Baum, Determination of the nearest-neighbor interaction in VO₂ via fractal dimension analysis. Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043272 (2023). 34

  29. [29]

    Kazenwadel, N

    D. Kazenwadel, N. Neathery, S. Prakash, A. Ariando, P. Baum, Cooling times in femtosecond pump-probe experiments of phase transitions with latent heat. Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043077 (2023)

  30. [30]

    Tao, T.-R

    Z. Tao, T.-R. T. Han, S. D. Mahanti, P. M. Duxbury, F. Yuan, C.-Y. Ruan, K. Wang, J. Wu, Decoupling of Structural and Electronic Phase Transitions in VO₂. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012)

  31. [31]

    Z. Tao, F. Zhou, T.-R. T. Han, D. Torres, T. Wang, N. Sepulveda, K. Chang, M. Young, R. R. Lunt, C.-Y. Ruan, The nature of photoinduced phase transition and metastable states in vanadium dioxide. Scientific Reports 6, 38514 (2016)

  32. [32]

    B.-H. Chen, E. Wittmann, Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, E. Riedle, Octave-spanning single-cycle middle-infrared generation through optical parametric amplification in LiGaS2. Opt. Express 27, 21306 (2019)

  33. [33]

    Beaini, B

    R. Beaini, B. Baloukas, S. Loquai, J. E. Klemberg-Sapieha, L. Martinu, Thermochromic VO₂-based smart radiator devices with ultralow refractive index cavities for increased performance. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 205, 110260 (2020)

  34. [34]

    M. B. Agranat, S. I. Ashitkov, A. V. Ovchinnikov, D. S. Sitnikov, A. A. Yurkevich, O. V. Chefonov, L. T. Perel’man, S. I. Anisimov, V. E. Fortov, Thermal emission of hot electrons in a metal. Jetp Lett. 101, 598–602 (2015)

  35. [35]

    Wien, Ueber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspectrum eines schwarzen Körpers

    W. Wien, Ueber die Energievertheilung im Emissionsspectrum eines schwarzen Körpers. Annalen der Physik 294, 662–669 (1896)

  36. [36]

    C. H. Lui, K. F. Mak, J. Shan, T. F. Heinz, Ultrafast Photoluminescence from Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 127404 (2010)

  37. [37]

    Felde, W

    B. Felde, W. Niessner, D. Schalch, A. Scharmann, M. Werling, Plasmon excitation in vanadium dioxide films. Thin Solid Films 305, 61–65 (1997)

  38. [38]

    Kepič, M

    P. Kepič, M. Horák, J. Kabát, M. Hájek, A. Konečná, T. Šikola, F. Ligmajer, Coexisting Phases of Individual VO₂ Nanoparticles for Multilevel Nanoscale Memory. ACS Nano 19, 1167–1176 (2025)

  39. [39]

    Kuttruff, D

    J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, A.-C. Zimmermann, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Terahertz control and timing correlations in a transmission electron microscope. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl6543 (2024)

  40. [40]

    Kazenwadel, Daniel, Holder, Jacob, Kuttruff, Joel, Baum, Peter, Energy offset between femtosecond and thermal electrons in nanometer field-emitter tips. Phys. Rev. Applied, doi: 10.1103/y8mq-nhx2 (2025)

  41. [41]

    Baum, On the physics of ultrashort single-electron pulses for time-resolved microscopy and diffraction

    P. Baum, On the physics of ultrashort single-electron pulses for time-resolved microscopy and diffraction. Chemical Physics 423, 55–61 (2013)

  42. [42]

    Kuttruff, J

    J. Kuttruff, J. Holder, Y. Meng, P. Baum, Real-time electron clustering in an event-driven hybrid pixel detector. Ultramicroscopy 255, 113864 (2024)

  43. [43]

    Frigge, B

    T. Frigge, B. Hafke, V. Tinnemann, T. Witte, M. Horn-von Hoegen, Spot profile analysis and lifetime mapping in ultrafast electron diffraction: Lattice excitation of self-organized Ge nanostructures on Si(001). Structural Dynamics 2, 035101 (2015). 35

  44. [44]

    Shorokhov, A

    D. Shorokhov, A. H. Zewail, Perspective: 4D ultrafast electron microscopy— Evolutions and revolutions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 144, 080901 (2016)

  45. [45]

    B. J. Siwick, J. R. Dwyer, R. E. Jordan, R. J. D. Miller, Femtosecond electron diffraction studies of strongly driven structural phase transitions. Chemical Physics 299, 285–305 (2004)

  46. [46]

    Domröse, L

    T. Domröse, L. Da Camara Silva, C. Ropers, Megahertz cycling of ultrafast structural dynamics enabled by nanosecond thermal dissipation. Applied Physics Letters 126 (2025)

  47. [47]

    Barwick, D

    B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, A. H. Zewail, Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009)

  48. [48]

    Morimoto, P

    Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Attosecond control of electron beams at dielectric and absorbing membranes. Phys. Rev. A 97, 033815 (2018)

  49. [49]

    A. S. Johnson, E. Pastor, S. Batlle-Porro, H. Benzidi, T. Katayama, G. A. De La Peña Muñoz, V. Krapivin, S. Kim, N. López, M. Trigo, S. E. Wall, All-optical seeding of a light- induced phase transition with correlated disorder. Nat. Phys. 20, 970–975 (2024)

  50. [50]

    J. A. Ramirez-Rincon, C. L. Gomez-Heredia, A. Corvisier, J. Ordonez-Miranda, T. Girardeau, F. Paumier, C. Champeaux, F. Dumas-Bouchiat, Y. Ezzahri, K. Joulain, O. Ares, J. J. Alvarado-Gil, Thermal hysteresis measurement of the VO₂ dielectric function for its metal-insulator transition by visible-IR ellipsometry. Journal of Applied Physics 124, 195102 (2018)

  51. [51]

    Mooradian, Photoluminescence of Metals

    A. Mooradian, Photoluminescence of Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 185–187 (1969)

  52. [52]

    Ising, Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus

    E. Ising, Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik 31, 253–258 (1925)

  53. [53]

    Rodriguez-Vega, M

    M. Rodriguez-Vega, M. T. Simons, E. Radue, S. Kittiwatanakul, J. Lu, S. A. Wolf, R. A. Lukaszew, I. Novikova, E. Rossi, Effect of inhomogeneities and substrate on the dynamics of the metal-insulator transition in VO₂ thin films. Physical Review B 92, 115420 (2015)

  54. [54]

    L. Chen, Z. Xiang, C. Tinsman, T. Asaba, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, L. Li, Enhancement of thermal conductivity across the metal-insulator transition in vanadium dioxide. Applied Physics Letters 113, 061902 (2018)

  55. [55]

    T. C. Choy, Effective Medium Theory: Principles and Applications (Oxford university press, Oxford, 2nd ed., 2016)International series of monographs on physics

  56. [56]

    V. K. Rajan, J. Chao, S. Taylor, L. Wang, Lowering insulator-to-metal transition temperature of vanadium dioxide thin films via co-sputtering, furnace oxidation, and thermal annealing. Journal of Applied Physics 137, 195302 (2025)

  57. [57]

    X. Chen, M. Wu, X. Liu, D. Wang, F. Liu, Y. Chen, F. Yi, W. Huang, S. Wang, Tuning the Doping Ratio and Phase Transition Temperature of VO₂ Thin Film by Dual-Target Co- Sputtering. Nanomaterials 9, 834 (2019)

  58. [58]

    Y. Cui, Y. Wang, B. Liu, H. Luo, Y. Gao, First-Principles Study on the Phase Transition Temperature of X-Doped (X = Li, Na or K) VO₂. RSC Adv. 6, 64394–64399 (2016). 36

  59. [59]

    C. Wen, L. Feng, Z. Li, J. Bai, S. Wang, X. Gao, J. Wang, W. Yao, A review of the preparation, properties and applications of VO₂ thin films with the reversible phase transition. Front. Mater. 11, 1341518 (2024)

  60. [60]

    L. Fan, X. Wang, F. Wang, Q. Zhang, L. Zhu, Q. Meng, B. Wang, Z. Zhang, C. Zou, Revealing the role of oxygen vacancies on the phase transition of VO₂ film from the optical- constant measurements. RSC Adv. 8, 19151–19156 (2018)

  61. [61]

    Zhang, F

    Z. Zhang, F. Zuo, C. Wan, A. Dutta, J. Kim, J. Rensberg, R. Nawrodt, H. H. Park, T. J. Larrabee, X. Guan, Y. Zhou, S. M. Prokes, C. Ronning, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, M. A. Kats, S. Ramanathan, Evolution of Metallicity in Vanadium Dioxide by Creation of Oxygen Vacancies. Phys. Rev. Applied 7, 034008 (2017)

  62. [62]

    Jeong, N

    J. Jeong, N. Aetukuri, T. Graf, T. D. Schladt, M. G. Samant, S. S. P. Parkin, Suppression of Metal-Insulator Transition in VO₂ by Electric Field–Induced Oxygen Vacancy Formation. Science 339, 1402–1405 (2013)

  63. [63]

    H. Ji, D. Liu, H. Cheng, C. Zhang, L. Yang, D. Ren, Infrared thermochromic properties of monoclinic VO₂ nanopowders using a malic acid-assisted hydrothermal method for adaptive camouflage. RSC Adv. 7, 5189–5194 (2017)

  64. [64]

    Ziegler, SRIM & TRIM (2025)

    J. Ziegler, SRIM & TRIM (2025). http://www.srim.org/

  65. [65]

    L. H. Avanzi, V. A. P. Aguiar, K. M. Costa, T. O. Santarelli, N. H. Medina, J. R. B. Oliveira, F. Cappuzzello, F. Iazzi, V. Capirossi, F. Pinna, M. Cavallaro, M. A. Guazzelli, Using TRIM-SRIM code simulations to determine defect density produced in HOPG irradiated with high energy heavy ions. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2340, 012002 (2022)

  66. [66]

    Pandey, K

    K. Pandey, K. Paredis, T. Hantschel, C. Drijbooms, W. Vandervorst, The impact of focused ion beam induced damage on scanning spreading resistance microscopy measurements. Sci Rep 10, 14893 (2020)

  67. [67]

    L. Zhao, Y. Cui, W. Li, W. A. Khan, Y. Ma, 3-D SRIM Simulation of Focused Ion Beam Sputtering with an Application-Oriented Incident Beam Model. Applied Sciences 9, 5133 (2019)