pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05412 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Magnetic toroidal monopoles from relativistic polarization responses to magnetic field gradients

Taisei Yamanaka , Takumi Sato , Satoru Hayami This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords magnetic toroidal monopolesrelativistic polarizationmagnetic field gradientsBerry curvatureorbital magnetic momentantiferromagnetsnonreciprocal dichroismquantum geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic toroidal monopoles in crystals are defined by the relativistic electric polarization response to a magnetic field gradient and expressed through Berry curvatures in an extended parameter space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to calculate the magnetic toroidal monopole, a time-reversal-odd scalar, in periodic solids by adding the magnetic field gradient correction to the relativistic electric polarization. This yields an explicit formula in terms of geometric objects such as Berry curvatures and orbital magnetic moments defined over crystal momentum plus magnetic and electric fields. The authors test the expression on an antiferromagnetic model and find a nonzero value. A sympathetic reader would care because conventional multipole expansions and thermodynamic definitions fail for this object, yet it governs observable effects such as electric-field-induced nonreciprocal directional dichroism.

Core claim

By incorporating the magnetic-field-gradient correction to the relativistic polarization, the authors obtain an explicit expression for the magnetic toroidal monopole in periodic crystals. The expression is written in terms of Berry curvatures and orbital magnetic moments defined in the extended parameter space that includes crystal momentum, magnetic field, and electric field. Model calculations on an antiferromagnetic system confirm that the resulting quantity is finite, providing a concrete computational route beyond symmetry arguments or standard multipole expansions.

What carries the argument

The magnetic-field-gradient correction to relativistic electric polarization, formulated with Berry curvatures and orbital magnetic moments in the extended momentum-magnetic-electric parameter space.

If this is right

  • The monopole becomes computable in concrete crystal models using standard geometric quantities.
  • Its quantum geometric origin clarifies the mechanism behind nonreciprocal optical responses such as directional dichroism.
  • The framework applies directly to antiferromagnetic systems and yields finite values where expected.
  • It supplies a practical characterization tool for time-reversal-odd scalars that escape thermodynamic definitions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Response-based definitions of this type could be extended to other multipoles that resist conventional expansions.
  • Electric-field tuning of the monopole strength may become feasible in materials with strong spin-orbit coupling.
  • The extended parameter-space geometry might connect to topological invariants in related condensed-matter settings.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic toroidal monopole in periodic crystals can be rigorously captured by the response of relativistic electric polarization to a magnetic field gradient independently of conventional multipole expansions.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement in which the proposed polarization-response quantity vanishes in a crystal where symmetry permits a nonzero magnetic toroidal monopole, or is nonzero where symmetry requires it to vanish.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05412 by Satoru Hayami, Taisei Yamanaka, Takumi Sato.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a,b) Schematic illustrations of the model with mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a), (b) Band structures calculated from Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a), (d) Band structures calculated from Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The magnetic toroidal monopole, a time-reversal-odd scalar, has attracted attention through its characteristic responses, such as electric-field-induced nonreciprocal directional dichroism observed in Co$_2$SiO$_4$. However, its evaluation in crystalline solids remains unresolved, as it cannot be defined within conventional multipole expansions or thermodynamic formulations. In this paper, we propose a theoretical framework to evaluate the magnetic toroidal monopole in periodic crystals based on the response of relativistic electric polarization to a magnetic field gradient. By incorporating the magnetic-field-gradient correction to the relativistic polarization, we derive an explicit expression for the magnetic toroidal monopole beyond symmetry arguments. The resulting expression is formulated in terms of geometric quantity such as Berry curvatures and orbital magnetic moment defined in an extended parameter space spanning momentum, magnetic field, and electric field. We further perform model calculations for an antiferromagnetic system hosting a magnetic toroidal monopole and confirm that the proposed quantity is finite. These results provide a practical route to characterize magnetic toroidal monopoles in crystalline solids and clarify their quantum geometric nature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework to evaluate the magnetic toroidal monopole in periodic crystals via the linear response of relativistic electric polarization to a magnetic field gradient. It derives an explicit expression for this quantity in terms of Berry curvatures and orbital magnetic moments defined in an extended (k, B, E) parameter space, going beyond symmetry arguments, and reports a finite value from model calculations in an antiferromagnetic system.

Significance. If the central derivation is valid and gauge-invariant, this provides a practical, geometry-based route to compute a previously symmetry-only quantity, with potential applications to magnetoelectric responses and nonreciprocal optics in materials such as Co2SiO4. The link to extended-space Berry geometry is a conceptual strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the polarization response and extended-parameter-space geometric quantities] The derivation of the explicit expression for the magnetic toroidal monopole (via the ∇B correction to relativistic polarization) assumes that Berry curvature Ω and orbital moment m remain well-defined and gauge-invariant in the extended (k, B, E) space when a position-dependent vector potential A(r) incorporating the linear ∇B term is introduced. In periodic crystals this breaks strict Bloch periodicity, requiring a magnetic supercell or Peierls approximation whose validity for finite ∇B is not automatically guaranteed; any residual gauge dependence would directly affect the claimed expression. A explicit proof or numerical test of gauge invariance under this choice of A is needed to support the central claim.
  2. [Model calculations and numerical results] The model calculation in the antiferromagnet confirms that the proposed quantity is finite, but the abstract and results provide no error bars, convergence checks with respect to supercell size or k-point sampling, or validation against an independent method (e.g., direct multipole expansion in a finite cluster). This weakens the support for the practical utility of the expression.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'geometric quantity such as Berry curvatures' should read 'geometric quantities such as Berry curvatures' for grammatical consistency.
  2. [Theory section] The manuscript should include a brief discussion of how the relativistic polarization is defined and corrected for the ∇B term, with reference to the relevant equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below, indicating the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the polarization response and extended-parameter-space geometric quantities] The derivation of the explicit expression for the magnetic toroidal monopole (via the ∇B correction to relativistic polarization) assumes that Berry curvature Ω and orbital moment m remain well-defined and gauge-invariant in the extended (k, B, E) space when a position-dependent vector potential A(r) incorporating the linear ∇B term is introduced. In periodic crystals this breaks strict Bloch periodicity, requiring a magnetic supercell or Peierls approximation whose validity for finite ∇B is not automatically guaranteed; any residual gauge dependence would directly affect the claimed expression. A explicit proof or numerical test of gauge invariance under this choice of A is needed to support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the use of a position-dependent vector potential for the linear magnetic field gradient breaks the strict translational periodicity of the crystal. Our derivation relies on the Peierls approximation in the extended parameter space, which is a standard technique for handling weak field gradients in periodic systems. The geometric quantities are defined in the extended (k, B, E) space, and the expression for the magnetic toroidal monopole is formulated as a gauge-invariant physical response. To address the referee's concern, we will include in the revised manuscript an explicit demonstration of the gauge invariance of the final expression under the chosen form of A(r), along with a discussion of the validity of the approximation for small ∇B. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model calculations and numerical results] The model calculation in the antiferromagnet confirms that the proposed quantity is finite, but the abstract and results provide no error bars, convergence checks with respect to supercell size or k-point sampling, or validation against an independent method (e.g., direct multipole expansion in a finite cluster). This weakens the support for the practical utility of the expression.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for more rigorous numerical validation. In the original manuscript, the model calculations were performed with a converged k-point mesh and supercell size, but these details and error estimates were not explicitly reported. In the revision, we will add convergence plots or tables with respect to k-point sampling and supercell size, as well as error bars on the computed value of the magnetic toroidal monopole. For validation against an independent method like direct multipole expansion in a finite cluster, we note that such an approach is not straightforward for periodic systems with relativistic effects and would require a different computational setup. We will instead emphasize the consistency of our results with symmetry expectations and add the convergence data to support the practical utility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: monopole expression derived from independent geometric response functions

full rationale

The paper starts from the established relativistic electric polarization (itself expressed via Berry curvature and orbital moment in (k,E) space) and adds a first-order correction linear in ∇B. The resulting formula for the magnetic toroidal monopole is then written directly in terms of the same geometric quantities now evaluated in the extended (k,B,E) parameter space. No step equates the target quantity to a fitted parameter, renames a known result, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The derivation therefore remains self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that relativistic polarization responses to field gradients capture the monopole beyond symmetry; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic toroidal monopole can be accessed via relativistic electric polarization response to magnetic field gradient in periodic crystals
    Central premise used to derive the explicit expression beyond symmetry arguments.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1232 out tokens · 78644 ms · 2026-05-10T19:24:38.612978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Hall Effect in Ferromag- netics, Phys. Rev.95, 1154 (1954)

    work page 1954

  2. [2]

    Smit, The spontaneous hall effect in ferromagnetics II, Physica24, 39 (1958)

    J. Smit, The spontaneous hall effect in ferromagnetics II, Physica24, 39 (1958)

    work page 1958

  3. [3]

    F. E. Maranzana, Contributions to the Theory of the Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferro- and Antiferromagnetic Materials, Phys. Rev.160, 421 (1967)

    work page 1967

  4. [4]

    Berger, Side-Jump Mechanism for the Hall Effect of Ferromagnets, Phys

    L. Berger, Side-Jump Mechanism for the Hall Effect of Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B2, 4559 (1970)

    work page 1970

  5. [5]

    Nozi` eres and C

    P. Nozi` eres and C. Lewiner, A simple theory of the anomalous hall effect in semiconductors, Journal de Physique34, 901 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    Loss and P

    D. Loss and P. M. Goldbart, Persistent currents from Berry’s phase in mesoscopic systems, Phys. Rev. B45, 13544 (1992)

    work page 1992

  7. [7]

    J. Ye, Y. B. Kim, A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, P. Majum- dar, and Z. Teˇ sanovi´ c, Berry Phase Theory of the Anoma- lous Hall Effect: Application to Colossal Magnetoresis- tance Manganites, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 3737 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Jungwirth, Q

    T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect in Ferromagnetic Semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 207208 (2002)

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Gos´ albez-Mart´ ınez, I

    D. Gos´ albez-Mart´ ınez, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Chi- ral degeneracies and Fermi-surface Chern numbers in bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. B92, 085138 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    I. V. Solovyev, Magneto-optical effect in the weak ferro- magnets LaMO3 (M= Cr, Mn, and Fe), Phys. Rev. B55, 8060 (1997)

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    Sivadas, S

    N. Sivadas, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Gate-Controllable Magneto-optic Kerr Effect in Layered Collinear Antifer- romagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 267203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 017205 (2014)

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Anomalous hall effect inκ-type organic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 075112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Essential role of the anisotropic magnetic dipole in the anomalous Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B103, L180407 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Chen, Electronic chiralization as an indicator of the anomalous Hall effect in unconventional magnetic sys- tems, Phys

    H. Chen, Electronic chiralization as an indicator of the anomalous Hall effect in unconventional magnetic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B106, 024421 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous hall ef- fect in antiferromagnetic perovskites, Phys. Rev. B106, 195149 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Rikken and E

    G. Rikken and E. Raupach, Observation of magneto- chiral dichroism, Nature390, 493 (1997)

    work page 1997

  21. [21]

    Wakatsuki, Y

    R. Wakatsuki, Y. Saito, S. Hoshino, Y. M. Itahashi, T. Ideue, M. Ezawa, Y. Iwasa, and N. Nagaosa, Nonre- ciprocal charge transport in noncentrosymmetric super- conductors, Science advances3, e1602390 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Nonlinear electric transport in odd-parity magnetic multipole systems: Application to Mn-based compounds, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043081 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Yatsushiro, R

    M. Yatsushiro, R. Oiwa, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami, Analysis of model-parameter dependences on the second- order nonlinear conductivity in PT-symmetric collinear antiferromagnetic metals with magnetic toroidal moment on zigzag chains, Phys. Rev. B105, 155157 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Hayami and M

    S. Hayami and M. Yatsushiro, Nonlinear nonreciprocal transport in antiferromagnets free from spin-orbit cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B106, 014420 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Suzuki, Tunneling spin current in systems with spin degeneracy, Phys

    Y. Suzuki, Tunneling spin current in systems with spin degeneracy, Phys. Rev. B105, 075201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Yanase, Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Physis15, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Curie, Sur la sym´ etrie dans les ph´ enom` enes physiques, sym´ etrie d’un champ ´ electrique et d’un champ magn´ etique, J

    P. Curie, Sur la sym´ etrie dans les ph´ enom` enes physiques, sym´ etrie d’un champ ´ electrique et d’un champ magn´ etique, J. Phys. Theor. Appl.3, 393 (1894)

    work page

  29. [29]

    Y. F. Popov, A. Kadomtseva, D. Belov, G. Vorob’ev, and A. Zvezdin, Magnetic-field-induced toroidal moment in the magnetoelectric Cr2O3, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 69, 330 (1999)

    work page 1999

  30. [30]

    Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J

    M. Fiebig, Revival of the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.38, R123 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    N. A. Spaldin and M. Fiebig, The renaissance of magne- toelectric multiferroics, Science309, 391 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Ederer and N

    C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, Towards a microscopic the- ory of toroidal moments in bulk periodic crystals, Phys. Rev. B76, 214404 (2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Hayami, H

    S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y. Motome, Spontaneous parity breaking in spin-orbital coupled systems, Phys. Rev. B90, 081115 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Th¨ ole and N

    F. Th¨ ole and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetoelectric multipoles in metals, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A376, 20170450 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Suzuki, H

    M.-T. Suzuki, H. Ikeda, and P. M. Oppeneer, First- principles theory of magnetic multipoles in condensed matter systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.87, 041008 (2018). 9

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Kusunose and S

    H. Kusunose and S. Hayami, Generalization of micro- scopic multipoles and cross-correlated phenomena by their orderings, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter34, 464002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Unified description of elec- tronic orderings and cross correlations by complete multi- pole representation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 072001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Time-reversal switching re- sponses in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, L140409 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Kuniyoshi, R

    S. Kuniyoshi, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Theory of many- body multipole operators in single-centered electron sys- tems: Two-body toroidal monopoles in spinless orbitals (2026), arXiv:2603.10620 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Schmid, On ferrotoroidics and electrotoroidic, mag- netotoroidic and piezotoroidic effects, Ferroelectrics252, 41 (2001)

    H. Schmid, On ferrotoroidics and electrotoroidic, mag- netotoroidic and piezotoroidic effects, Ferroelectrics252, 41 (2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    Schmid, J

    H. Schmid, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter20, 434201 (2008)

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    Hayashida, K

    T. Hayashida, K. Matsumoto, and T. Kimura, Electric Field-Induced Nonreciprocal Directional Dichroism in a Time-Reversal-Odd Antiferromagnet, Advanced Materi- als37, 2414876 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Y. Kato, T. Hayashida, K. Matsumoto, T. Kimura, and Y. Motome, Electric-field-induced magnetic toroidal mo- ment and nonlinear magnetoelectric effect in antiferro- magnetic olivines, Phys. Rev. B113, 094411 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    N. A. Spaldin, M. Fiebig, and M. Mostovoy, The toroidal moment in condensed-matter physics and its relation to the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter20, 434203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    J. Shi, G. Vignale, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Quantum The- ory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generalization to Interacting Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 197202 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    Y. Gao, D. Vanderbilt, and D. Xiao, Microscopic theory of spin toroidization in periodic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134423 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Shitade, H

    A. Shitade, H. Watanabe, and Y. Yanase, Theory of or- bital magnetic quadrupole moment and magnetoelectric susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B98, 020407 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Gao and D

    Y. Gao and D. Xiao, Orbital magnetic quadrupole mo- ment and nonlinear anomalous thermoelectric transport, Phys. Rev. B98, 060402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Shitade, A

    A. Shitade, A. Daido, and Y. Yanase, Theory of spin magnetic quadrupole moment and temperature-gradient- induced magnetization, Phys. Rev. B99, 024404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Daido, A

    A. Daido, A. Shitade, and Y. Yanase, Thermodynamic approach to electric quadrupole moments, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    ¯Oik´ e, R

    J. ¯Oik´ e, R. Peters, and K. Shinada, Thermodynamic for- mulation of the spin magnetic octupole moment in bulk crystals, Phys. Rev. B112, 134412 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Sato and S

    T. Sato and S. Hayami, Quantum theory of magnetic octupole in periodic crystals and application to d-wave altermagnets, npj Quantum Mater.11, 32 (2026)

    work page 2026

  53. [53]

    Sato and S

    T. Sato and S. Hayami, Orbital magnetic octupole in crystalline solids and anomalous hall response to a nonuniform electric field (2025), arXiv:2512.24269 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Spin Cur- rent and Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncollinear Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 057205 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    Hayami, R

    S. Hayami, R. Yambe, and H. Kusunose, Analysis of Photo-Induced Chirality and Magnetic Toroidal Moment Based on Floquet Formalism, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.93, 043702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Shitade, Intrinsic spin accumulation in the magnetic spin Hall effect, Phys

    A. Shitade, Intrinsic spin accumulation in the magnetic spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B112, 174431 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the hofstadter spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1348 (1995)

    work page 1995

  58. [58]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects, Phys. Rev. B59, 14915 (1999)

    work page 1999

  59. [59]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the Hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in mag- netic Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B53, 7010 (1996)

    work page 1996

  60. [60]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  61. [61]

    Y.-Q. Ma, S. Chen, H. Fan, and W.-M. Liu, Abelian and non-Abelian quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. B81, 245129 (2010)

    work page 2010

  62. [62]

    M. Kang, S. Kim, Y. Qian, P. M. Neves, L. Ye, J. Jung, D. Puntel, F. Mazzola, S. Fang, C. Jozwiak,et al., Mea- surements of the quantum geometric tensor in solids, Na- ture Physics21, 110 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Hayami, R

    S. Hayami, R. Oiwa, and H. Kusunose, Electric Ferro- Axial Moment as Nanometric Rotator and Source of Lon- gitudinal Spin Current, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.91, 113702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Kusunose, R

    H. Kusunose, R. Oiwa, and S. Hayami, Symmetry- adapted modeling for molecules and crystals, Phys. Rev. B107, 195118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, and H. Kusunose, Nonlin- ear spin Hall effect inPT-symmetric collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. B106, 024405 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Sato and S

    T. Sato and S. Hayami, Thermodynamic Multipoles and Dissipative Conductivities in Metallic Systems (2026), arXiv:2603.29267 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    K. S. Knight, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, C. L. Bull, and P. McIntyre, Nuclear and magnetic structures of KMnF3 perovskite in the temperature interval 10 K–105 K, J. Alloys Compd.842, 155935 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    V. O. Garlea, R. Jin, D. Mandrus, B. Roessli, Q. Huang, M. Miller, A. J. Schultz, and S. E. Nagler, Magnetic and Orbital Ordering in the Spinel MnV2O4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 066404 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    J. L. Garca-Muoz, J. Rodrguez-Carvajal, X. Obradors, M. Vallet-Reg, J. Gonz´ alez-Calbet, and M. Parras, Complex magnetic structures of the rare-earth cuprates R2Cu2O5 (R=Y,Ho,Er,Yb,Tm), Phys. Rev. B44, 4716 (1991)

    work page 1991

  70. [70]

    Morosan, J

    E. Morosan, J. A. Fleitman, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, Y. Chen, X. Ke, M. L. Dahlberg, P. Schiffer, C. R. Cra- ley, and R. J. Cava, Structure and magnetic properties of the Ho2Ge2O7 pyrogermanate, Phys. Rev. B77, 224423 (2008)

    work page 2008

  71. [71]

    M.-R. Li, M. Retuerto, D. Walker, T. Sarkar, P. W. Stephens, S. Mukherjee, T. S. Dasgupta, J. P. Hodges, M. Croft, C. P. Grams, J. Hemberger, J. S´ anchez- Ben´ ıtez, A. Huq, F. O. Saouma, J. I. Jang, and M. Green- blatt, Magnetic-Structure-Stabilized Polarization in an Above-Room-Temperature Ferrimagnet, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.53, 10774 (2014)

    work page 2014