arxiv: 2604.05666 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Two-colour coherent control of nuclear and electron dynamics in photoionization of molecular hydrogen with FEL pulses

Fabian Holzmeier , Alberto Gonzalez-Castrillo , Thomas M. Baumann , Roger Y. Bello , Carlo Callegari , Michele Di Fraia , Matteo Lucchini , Michael Meyer

show 7 more authors

Oksana Plekan Kevin C. Prince Eleonore Roussel Rene Wagner Fernando Martin Alicia Palacios Danielle Dowek

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

keywords coherent controlphotoionizationmolecular hydrogenfree-electron laserautoionizing statesnuclear wavefunctionvibrational dynamicstwo-photon ionization

0 comments

The pith

Relative phases between one-photon and two-photon ionization paths in H2 depend strongly on the final vibrational state of the molecular ion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper implements an omega-2omega coherent control scheme at a seeded free-electron laser to measure relative phases in the photoionization of molecular hydrogen. It shows that these phases vary markedly with photoelectron energy, which corresponds to different vibrational levels in the H2+ ground state, when the two-photon path proceeds through a selected intermediate neutral state. A sympathetic reader would care because the result demonstrates that interference between ionization routes can be used to probe and potentially steer the interplay of electron and nuclear motion on the electronic timescale in a molecule. The observed phase behavior is linked through calculation to specific autoionizing states and to how the nuclear wavefunction in the intermediate state projects onto the final ionic vibrational levels.

Core claim

In omega-2omega ionization of H2 from the ground state into the H2+ X state via the B 1Sigma_u+ v'=6 intermediate, the relative phases of the interfering one-photon and two-photon amplitudes exhibit a pronounced dependence on photoelectron energy and emission angle; these phase jumps arise from the coupled electronic and nuclear dynamics in the two-photon channel, shaped by the H2 1Sigma_g+ and 1Pi_g autoionizing states together with the mapping of the intermediate nuclear wavefunction onto the final H2+ vibrational states.

What carries the argument

Interference between the one-photon (2omega) and two-photon (omega) photoionization amplitudes, with the relative phase retrieved as a function of energy and angle.

If this is right

The phase dependence on final vibrational state allows selective steering of the ionization outcome through interference control.
Coupled electron-nuclear dynamics in molecules become accessible on the electronic timescale using existing two-color FEL schemes.
Selective excitation of specific intermediate vibrational levels becomes a tool for mapping nuclear wavefunction projections into ionic states.
The same interference readout can be applied to other molecular targets to explore previously inaccessible reaction pathways.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar phase measurements could serve as a spectroscopic probe for autoionizing resonances in larger molecules where nuclear motion is slower.
Extending the scheme to time-delayed pulses might allow active control of dissociation versus ionization branching ratios.
The observed sensitivity to nuclear wavefunction mapping suggests that phase data could benchmark theoretical treatments of non-Born-Oppenheimer effects.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical calculations used to assign the phase jumps accurately capture the contributions from the autoionizing states and the nuclear wavefunction mapping without significant model error.

What would settle it

An experimental scan of the relative phase versus photoelectron energy that shows no jumps at the vibrational thresholds predicted by the model, or jumps at energies where the model predicts none.

read the original abstract

The extension of coherent $\omega$-$2\omega$ control schemes, recently implemented in free-electron lasers (FELs), to molecular systems offers new opportunities to control chemical dynamics on the electronic timescale, potentially allowing for the steering of reactions along previously inaccessible pathways. We have implemented such a scheme at the seeded FERMI FEL to retrieve the relative phases between one-photon (frequency $2\omega$) and two-photon (frequency $\omega$) ionization paths in the hydrogen molecule as a function of photoelectron energy and emission angle. The narrow bandwidth of the XUV pulses enables selective excitation of vibrational levels of neutral intermediate H$_2$ states in the two-photon ionization path. Here we focus on $\omega$--$2\omega$ ionization of H$_2(X\,^{1}\Sigma_g^{+},\,v=0)$ into the H$_2^{+}(X\,^{2}\Sigma_g^{+},\,v_f)$ ground state involving the H$_2(B\,^{1}\Sigma_u^{+},\,v'=6)$ intermediate state. The relative phases of the $\omega$ and $2\omega$ interfering photoionization amplitudes exhibit a strong dependence on photoelectron energy, i.e.\ on the final vibrational state $v_f$ in the H$_2^{+}$ cation. With the help of accurate theoretical calculations, the observed phase jumps are assigned to the coupled electronic and nuclear dynamics at play in the two-photon process, significantly influenced by H$_2(^{1}\Sigma_g^{+}$ and $^{1}\Pi_g)$ autoionizing states and the mapping of the H$_2(B\,^{1}\Sigma_u^{+},\,v'=6)$ intermediate-state nuclear wavefunction into the final vibrational states of H$_2^{+}(X\,^{2}\Sigma_g^{+})$. The present work establishes the fundamental concepts required to access coupled electron--nuclear dynamics in molecules using $\omega$--$2\omega$ coherent control schemes currently available at free-electron laser facilities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper measures energy- and angle-dependent phases in ω-2ω photoionization of H2 at FERMI and assigns the jumps to autoionizing states plus nuclear wavefunction mapping via theory comparison.

read the letter

The core result is an experimental extraction of relative phases between the one-photon and two-photon ionization amplitudes in H2, resolved by photoelectron energy (hence final vibrational state vf) and emission angle. They use the narrow-band seeded FEL pulses to hit the B 1Σu+ (v'=6) intermediate selectively in the two-photon path and observe clear phase variations that track the final H2+ vibrational levels. The angle dependence is also reported, which adds some spatial information. This is a clean extension of atomic ω-2ω schemes to a molecular case where nuclear motion matters, and the selective vibrational excitation is a practical advantage of the FEL source. The data appear reproducible enough to show the phase jumps distinctly. The assignment of those jumps to interference involving the 1Σg+ and 1Πg autoionizing states plus the projection of the B-state nuclear wavefunction onto the H2+ continua rests on comparison with close-coupling or R-matrix calculations. That match is presented as confirmatory, but the paper does not appear to include systematic tests of how the computed phases shift when resonance positions, widths, or continuum phases are varied within reasonable bounds. If the theory has even moderate error in those ingredients, the specific assignment could move. The experimental observation itself stands independently of that interpretation. This work is aimed at groups doing ultrafast molecular control and FEL-based coherent experiments. It is worth sending to peer review because the measurement is new and the setup is technically solid, even though the theory-dependent part will need careful referee scrutiny on the model validation.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the implementation of a two-color ω-2ω coherent control scheme at the seeded FERMI FEL to measure the relative phases between one-photon (2ω) and two-photon (ω) ionization pathways in H2(X 1Σg+, v=0) via the H2(B 1Σu+, v'=6) intermediate state, leading to H2+(X 2Σg+, vf) final states. Experimental data show strong dependence of the interfering amplitudes' relative phases on photoelectron energy (i.e., on vf) and emission angle. Accurate theoretical calculations are used to assign the observed phase jumps to coupled electronic-nuclear dynamics, specifically the influence of H2(1Σg+ and 1Πg) autoionizing states and the projection of the intermediate nuclear wavefunction onto the final vibrational continua.

Significance. If the assignment holds, the work is significant for extending FEL-based coherent control to molecular systems and demonstrating access to coupled electron-nuclear dynamics on the electronic timescale. The narrow-bandwidth selective excitation and direct measurement of energy- and angle-dependent phases are clear experimental strengths that provide a concrete platform for future steering of molecular reaction pathways. The combination of FEL experiment with supporting theory establishes foundational concepts for this class of control schemes.

major comments (2)

[theoretical calculations and comparison to experiment] § on theoretical calculations and comparison to experiment: the assignment of the observed phase jumps specifically to the H2(1Σg+ and 1Πg) autoionizing states plus the B-state nuclear wavefunction mapping is load-bearing for the central interpretation, yet the manuscript reports no systematic sensitivity tests (e.g., variation of resonance parameters, enlargement of the vibrational basis, or comparison to an independent TDSE implementation on a different grid). Without such checks the match could be non-unique even if the experimental phases are robust.
[Results section, phase-vs-energy data and figures] Results section, phase-vs-energy data and figures: the quantitative comparison between measured and computed phases is presented as confirmatory, but the manuscript does not report propagated uncertainties from the theoretical continuum phases or from possible omissions of higher-lying resonances; this leaves open whether small model adjustments could shift or eliminate the computed jumps while leaving the experimental data unchanged.

minor comments (2)

[abstract] The abstract states the assignment before fully summarizing the raw experimental observation; reversing the order would improve clarity for readers.
[figure captions] Figure captions for the phase data should explicitly state how experimental uncertainties were determined and whether they include both statistical and systematic contributions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the experimental strengths and the significance of extending coherent control to molecular systems. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments, with revisions incorporated to address the concerns regarding theoretical robustness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: § on theoretical calculations and comparison to experiment: the assignment of the observed phase jumps specifically to the H2(1Σg+ and 1Πg) autoionizing states plus the B-state nuclear wavefunction mapping is load-bearing for the central interpretation, yet the manuscript reports no systematic sensitivity tests (e.g., variation of resonance parameters, enlargement of the vibrational basis, or comparison to an independent TDSE implementation on a different grid). Without such checks the match could be non-unique even if the experimental phases are robust.

Authors: We acknowledge that explicit sensitivity tests were not detailed in the original submission. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection (and accompanying supplementary figures) that systematically varies the autoionizing resonance positions and widths within their literature uncertainties, enlarges the vibrational basis by 50 %, and recomputes the phases. The phase jumps remain stable in position and magnitude across all variants, confirming that the assignment is not an artifact of a particular parameter choice. An independent TDSE implementation on a different grid would require substantial new code development; our existing calculations already include extensive convergence checks with respect to grid spacing, time step, and basis size, and the theory reproduces both the experimental phase jumps and the absolute ionization yields. We therefore consider the current framework sufficient, but we have added a brief discussion of these convergence tests to the revised text. revision: yes
Referee: Results section, phase-vs-energy data and figures: the quantitative comparison between measured and computed phases is presented as confirmatory, but the manuscript does not report propagated uncertainties from the theoretical continuum phases or from possible omissions of higher-lying resonances; this leaves open whether small model adjustments could shift or eliminate the computed jumps while leaving the experimental data unchanged.

Authors: We agree that uncertainty quantification strengthens the comparison. In the revised version we have propagated uncertainties arising from the resonance parameters into the computed phases and display them as shaded bands in the updated figures. We have also explicitly tested the effect of including additional higher-lying autoionizing states (up to 5 eV above the ionization threshold) and find their contribution to the phase in the experimentally accessed range to be smaller than the propagated uncertainty. These results are now reported in the revised Results section and supplementary material, showing that the observed jumps cannot be removed by plausible adjustments within the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental phases measured directly and assigned via separate theoretical calculations

full rationale

The paper's central result consists of measured relative phases between one- and two-photon ionization paths as a function of photoelectron energy, obtained from FEL experiments on H2. These phases are not derived or fitted within the paper but are directly extracted from interference patterns in the data. The assignment of phase jumps to specific autoionizing states and nuclear wavefunction mapping is performed by comparison to independent theoretical calculations (close-coupling or similar), which are presented as external support rather than a self-referential derivation. No equations or steps reduce the observed phases to fitted parameters by construction, nor does the assignment rely on a load-bearing self-citation chain that is itself unverified. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks (experimental data and separate computations), with theory serving only as interpretive aid.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard quantum-mechanical treatment of molecular photoionization and the accuracy of existing ab initio calculations for H2 states; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard time-dependent perturbation theory and dipole approximation apply to the ω and 2ω ionization amplitudes.
Invoked implicitly when defining interfering one- and two-photon paths.
domain assumption The nuclear wavefunction of the B state maps onto final H2+ vibrational states according to Franck-Condon factors modified by autoionization.
Used to assign the observed phase jumps.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1394 out tokens · 35156 ms · 2026-05-10T19:23:04.855769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The relative phases of the ω and 2ω interfering photoionization amplitudes exhibit a strong dependence on photoelectron energy... assigned to the coupled electronic and nuclear dynamics... influenced by H2(1Σg+ and 1Πg) autoionizing states and the mapping of the H2(B 1Σu+, v'=6) intermediate-state nuclear wavefunction
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

ab initio simulations performed within the second order time-dependent perturbation theory

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

[1]

Zewail, A. H. Femtochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 12427–12446 (1993)

work page 1993
[2]

& Martín, F

Nisoli, M., Decleva, P., Calegari, F., Palacios, A. & Martín, F. Attosecond Electron Dynam- ics in Molecules. Chem. Rev. 117, 10760–10825 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

& Nisoli, M

Borrego-Varillas, R., Lucchini, M. & Nisoli, M. Attosecond spectroscopy for the investiga- tion of ultrafast dynamics in atomic, molecular and solid-state physics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 066401 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

& Martin, F

Calegari, F. & Martin, F. Open questions in attochemistry. Commun. Chem. 6, 184 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Kling, M. F. et al. Control of Electron Localization in Molecular Dissociation. Science 312, 246–248 (2006)

work page 2006
[6]

Kling, M. F. & Vrakking, M. J. J. Attosecond Electron Dynamics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59, 463–492 (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

Prince, K. C. et al. Coherent control with a short-wavelength free-electron laser. Nat. Pho- tonics 10, 176–179 (2016)

work page 2016
[8]

Gauthier, D. et al. Generation of Phase-Locked Pulses from a Seeded Free -Electron Laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 024801 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Usenko, S. et al. Attosecond interferometry with self-amplified spontaneous emission of a free-electron laser. Nat. Commun. 8, 15626 (2017)

work page 2017
[10]

Giannessi, L. et al. Coherent control schemes for the photoionization of neon and he- lium in the Extreme Ultraviolet spectral region. Sci. Rep. 8, 7774 (2018)

work page 2018
[11]

V., Grum -Grzhimailo, A

Gryzlova, E. V., Grum -Grzhimailo, A. N., Staroselskaya, E. I., Douguet, N. & Bartschat, K. Quantum coherent control of the photoelectron angular distribution in bichro- matic-field ionization of atomic neon. Phys. Rev. A 97, 013420 (2018)

work page 2018
[12]

Di Fraia, M. et al. Complete Characterization of Phase and Amplitude of Bichromatic Extreme Ultraviolet Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213904 (2019). 29

work page 2019
[13]

Allaria, E. et al. Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free -elec- tron laser in the extreme ultraviolet. Nat. Photonics 6, 699–704 (2012)

work page 2012
[14]

Yin, Y.-Y., Chen, C., Elliott, D. S. & Smith, A. V. Asymmetric photoelectron angular distributions from interfering photoionization processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2353 –2356 (1992)

work page 1992
[15]

& Elliott, D

Wang, Z.-M. & Elliott, D. S. Determination of the Phase Difference between Even and Odd Continuum Wave Functions in Atoms through Quantum Interference Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 173001 (2001)

work page 2001
[16]

B., Chudinov, A

Baranova, N. B., Chudinov, A. N. & Zel’dovich, B. Ya. Polar asymmetry of photoion- ization by a field with 〈E3〉 ≠ 0. Theory and experiment. Opt. Commun. 79, 116–120 (1990)

work page 1990
[17]

Žitnik, M. et al. Interference of two-photon transitions induced by XUV light. Optica 9, 692–700 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

You, D. et al. New Method for Measuring Angle -Resolved Phases in Photoemission. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031070 (2020)

work page 2020
[19]

Gryzlova, E. V. et al. Influence of an atomic resonance on the coherent control of the photoionization process. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033231 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Maroju, P. K. et al. Attosecond coherent control of electronic wave packets in two - colour photoionization using a novel timing tool for seeded free-electron laser. Nat. Photon- ics 17, 200–207 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

Haessler, S. et al. Phase-resolved attosecond near-threshold photoionization of molec- ular nitrogen. Phys. Rev. A 80, 011404 (2009)

work page 2009
[22]

Cattaneo, L. et al. Attosecond coupled electron and nuclear dynamics in dissociative ionization of H2. Nat. Phys. 14, 733–738 (2018). 30

work page 2018
[23]

Nandi, S. et al. Attosecond timing of electron emission from a molecular shape reso- nance. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba7762

work page
[24]

Y., Martín, F

Bello, R. Y., Martín, F. & Palacios, A. Attosecond laser control of photoelectron angu- lar distributions in XUV-induced ionization of H2. Faraday Discuss. 228, 378–393 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

Suñer-Rubio, A. J. et al. Attosecond photoionization delays in molecules: The role of nuclear motion. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022066 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

E., Trevor, D

Pollard, J. E., Trevor, D. J., Reutt, J. E., Lee, Y. T. & Shirley, D. A. Rotationally re- solved photoelectron spectroscopy of n -H2, p -H2, HD, and D2. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 34–46 (1982)

work page 1982
[27]

Holzmeier, F. et al. Control of H2 Dissociative Ionization in the Nonlinear Regime Using Vacuum Ultraviolet Free-Electron Laser Pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 103002 (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

Svetina, C. et al. The Low Density Matter (LDM) beamline at FERMI: optical layout and first commissioning. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 538–543 (2015)

work page 2015
[29]

Lyamayev, V. et al. A modular end-station for atomic, molecular, and cluster science at the low density matter beamline of FERMI@Elettra. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 164007 (2013)

work page 2013
[30]

Palacios, A., Feist, J., González‐Castrillo, A., Sanz‐Vicario, J. L. & Martín, F. Autoi- onization of Molecular Hydrogen: Where do the Fano Lineshapes Go? ChemPhysChem 14, 1456–1463 (2013)

work page 2013
[31]

& Martín, F

Sánchez, I. & Martín, F. The doubly excited states of the H2 molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 7720–7730 (1997)

work page 1997
[32]

Ito, K., Hall, R. I. & Ukai, M. Dissociative photoionization of H2 and D2 in the energy region of 25–45 eV. J. Chem. Phys. 104, 8449–8457 (1996)

work page 1996
[33]

& Martín, F

Palacios, A., González-Castrillo, A. & Martín, F. Molecular interferometer to decode attosecond electron–nuclear dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 3973–3978 (2014). 31

work page 2014
[34]

The photoelectron spectrum of H2

Åsbrink, L. The photoelectron spectrum of H2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 7, 549–552 (1970)

work page 1970
[35]

Philip, J. et al. Highly accurate transition frequencies in the H2 Lyman and Werner absorption bands. Can. J. Chem. 82, 713–722 (2004)

work page 2004
[36]

& Martín, F

Palacios, A., Bachau, H. & Martín, F. Enhancement and Control of H2 Dissociative Ionization by Femtosecond VUV Laser Pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 143001 (2006)

work page 2006
[37]

Carpeggiani, P. A. et al. Disclosing intrinsic molecular dynamics on the 1 -fs scale through extreme-ultraviolet pump-probe measurements. Phys. Rev. A 89, 023420 (2014)

work page 2014
[38]

& Martín, F

Palacios, A., Bachau, H. & Martín, F. Excitation and ionization of molecular hydrogen by ultrashort vuv laser pulses. Phys. Rev. A 75, 013408 (2007)

work page 2007
[39]

& Palacios, A

González-Castrillo, A., Martín, F. & Palacios, A. Quantum state holography to recon- struct the molecular wave packet using an attosecond XUV –XUV pump-probe technique. Sci. Rep. 10, 12981 (2020)

work page 2020
[40]

Gardner, J. L. & Samson, J. A. R. Proton kinetic-energy distributions from dissociative photoionization of hydrogen. Phys. Rev. A 12, 1404–1407 (1975)

work page 1975
[41]

Lafosse, A. et al. Molecular frame photoelectron angular distributions in dissociative photoionization of H 2 in the region of the Q 1 and Q2 doubly excited states. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36, 4683–4702 (2003)

work page 2003
[42]

N., Gryzlova, E

Grum-Grzhimailo, A. N., Gryzlova, E. V., Staroselskaya, E. I., Venzke, J. & Bartschat, K. Interfering one -photon and two -photon ionization by femtosecond VUV pulses in the region of an intermediate resonance. Phys. Rev. A 91, 063418 (2015)

work page 2015
[43]

A., Nahon, L

Garcia, G. A., Nahon, L. & Powis, I. Two-dimensional charged particle image inversion using a polar basis function expansion. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4989–4996 (2004)

work page 2004
[44]

& Decleva, P

Dowek, D. & Decleva, P. Trends in angle -resolved molecular photoelectron spectros- copy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 24614–24654 (2022). 32

work page 2022
[45]

Di Fraia, M. et al. Impulsive laser-induced alignment of OCS molecules at FERMI. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 19733–19739 (2017)

work page 2017
[46]

Varvarezos, L. et al. Controlling Fragmentation of the Acetylene Cation in the Vacuum Ultraviolet via Transient Molecular Alignment. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 24–31 (2023)

work page 2023
[47]

Decking, W. et al. A MHz-repetition-rate hard X -ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator. Nat. Photonics 14, 391–397 (2020)

work page 2020
[48]

Inoue, I. et al. Nanofocused attosecond hard x -ray free-electron laser with intensity exceeding 1019 W/cm2. Optica 12, 309 (2025)

work page 2025
[49]

Liu, T. et al. Status and future of the soft X -ray free -electron laser beamline at the SHINE. Front. Phys. 11, 1172368 (2023)

work page 2023
[50]

& Dunne, A

Schoenlein, R., Boutet, S., Minitti, M. & Dunne, A. M. The Linac Coherent Light Source: Recent Developments and Future Plans. Appl. Sci. 7, 850 (2017)

work page 2017
[51]

Sobolev, E. et al. Data reduction activities at European XFEL: early results. Front. Phys. 12, 1331329 (2024)

work page 2024
[52]

Guo, Z. et al. Experimental demonstration of attosecond pump –probe spectroscopy with an X-ray free-electron laser. Nat. Photonics 18, 691–697 (2024)

work page 2024
[53]

Multichannel theory of two-photon single and double ionization of helium

L A A Nikolopoulos & P Lambropoulos. Multichannel theory of two-photon single and double ionization of helium. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, 545 (2001)

work page 2001
[54]

L., Edah, G

Foumouo, E., Kamta, G. L., Edah, G. & Piraux, B. Theory of multiphoton single and double ionization of two-electron atomic systems driven by short-wavelength electric fields: An ab initio treatment. Phys. Rev. A 74, 063409 (2006)

work page 2006
[55]

& Martín, F

Sánchez, I. & Martín, F. Resonant dissociative photoionization of H 2 and D 2. Phys. Rev. A 57, 1006–1017 (1998). 33

work page 1998
[56]

Palacios, A., Sanz-Vicario, J. L. & Martín, F. Theoretical methods for attosecond elec- tron and nuclear dynamics: applications to the H2 molecule. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48, 242001 (2015). 34 Supplementary Material: Two-colour coherent control of nuclear and electron dynamics in photoion- ization of molecular hydrogen with FEL pulses Authors: F. ...

work page 2015