pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06027 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

Exploring bosonic bound states with parallel reaction coordinates

Guan-Yu Lai , Friedemann Quei{\ss}er , Gernot Schaller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords bound statesreaction coordinatesband gapsbosonic reservoirssupersystemdissipationperturbative treatmentquantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bound states in bosonic systems stay stable when their energy lies inside a reservoir band gap, as recovered by a perturbative supersystem treatment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines bound states that form when a bosonic system couples strongly to a reservoir whose spectrum contains an energy band gap. These states resist dissipation. The authors model the reservoir by adding multiple parallel reaction coordinates, each covering a narrow energy slice of the spectral function, and then apply a weak-coupling perturbative treatment to the combined supersystem. This reproduces the bound-state properties known from the exact model. Stability occurs precisely because the bound-state energy sits inside the gap. The same construction works for multiple gaps, and weak interactions are shown to give the state a finite lifetime that lengthens when the system-reservoir coupling is increased.

Core claim

In an exactly solvable bosonic model, bound states appear under strong coupling to a gapped reservoir. Representing the reservoir spectral function with multiple parallel reaction coordinates and treating the resulting supersystem perturbatively recovers the exact bound-state spectrum and stability. The stability condition is that the bound-state energy lies inside the band gap. Multiple gaps are handled by adding further coordinates, and the introduction of weak interactions renders the lifetime finite yet extendable by stronger coupling.

What carries the argument

Supersystem formed by the original system plus multiple parallel reaction coordinates, each representing a small energy interval of the reservoir spectral function.

If this is right

  • Bound-state stability is fixed by whether its energy lies inside the band gap.
  • Multiple band gaps are treated by adding one reaction coordinate per gap interval.
  • Weak interactions produce a finite lifetime that grows with increasing system-reservoir coupling strength.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reaction-coordinate construction supplies a practical route to bound-state analysis in models that lack exact solvability.
  • Lifetime predictions could be checked by measuring decay rates in circuit-QED or trapped-ion setups as a function of engineered coupling strength.
  • The same supersystem mapping may clarify how band-gap protection extends to driven or nonlinear reservoirs.

Load-bearing premise

The weak-coupling perturbative treatment of the supersystem with multiple reaction coordinates accurately reproduces the exact bound-state results of the original model.

What would settle it

Numerical comparison of the perturbative supersystem energy and decay rate against the exact diagonalization of the bosonic model, for a parameter set where the candidate bound-state energy crosses from inside to outside the gap.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06027 by Friedemann Quei{\ss}er, Gernot Schaller, Guan-Yu Lai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Plot of the squared excitation energies versus di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Analogous to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bound states are dissipation-resilient states that may emerge when quantum systems are strongly coupled to reservoirs with band gaps. We analyze an exactly solvable bosonic model for bound state existence and reproduce these results by a weak-coupling treatment of a supersystem composed of the original system and multiple reaction coordinates, which are individually representing small energy intervals of the reservoir spectral function. Within the perturbative supersystem treatment, the bound state stability results from its energy being inside the band gap. We discuss cases of multiple band gaps and also show that already in presence of weak interactions the bound state's lifetime is finite -- but can be increased by raising the system-reservoir coupling strength.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes an exactly solvable bosonic model of a quantum system strongly coupled to a reservoir with band gaps, demonstrating the existence of dissipation-resilient bound states. It claims to reproduce these exact results via a weak-coupling perturbative treatment of a supersystem formed by the original system plus multiple parallel reaction coordinates that discretize the reservoir spectral function into small energy intervals. Within this perturbative framework, bound-state stability is attributed to the state's energy lying inside the band gap. The work also examines cases with multiple band gaps and shows that weak interactions induce finite lifetimes, which can be extended by increasing the system-reservoir coupling strength.

Significance. If the claimed reproduction of exact bound-state energies and lifetimes holds under the weak-coupling supersystem approach, the paper provides a useful perturbative tool for understanding gap-protected states in bosonic systems, potentially extensible to more complex reservoirs. The parallel reaction coordinate discretization offers a concrete method to bridge strong-coupling exact solutions with perturbative analysis, and the discussion of interaction-induced finite lifetimes adds insight into practical stability limits. The absence of explicit quantitative benchmarks in the provided abstract and reader's assessment limits immediate assessment of impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (supersystem treatment) and §4 (results)] The central claim that the weak-coupling perturbative supersystem treatment reproduces the exact bound-state energies and lifetimes (abstract and presumably §3–4) is load-bearing but lacks explicit quantitative validation. No tables or figures directly compare energies inside the gap or lifetime scalings between the exact model and the perturbative results, nor are error estimates or convergence with number of reaction coordinates provided; this leaves the weakest assumption untested.
  2. [§4.2 (multiple band gaps)] The assertion that stability 'results from' the energy being inside the band gap (abstract) is presented as following directly from the perturbative treatment, but the manuscript does not derive or show how the gap condition emerges independently of the discretization parameters or coupling strength; a concrete check against the exact model's gap boundaries would strengthen this.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the reaction coordinates and their coupling strengths should be defined consistently in the main text rather than relying on the abstract; a small table summarizing the discretization scheme would improve clarity.
  2. [§5] The discussion of lifetime increase with coupling strength would benefit from a brief plot or scaling relation to illustrate the effect under weak interactions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help us improve the clarity and rigor of our presentation. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the validation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (supersystem treatment) and §4 (results)] The central claim that the weak-coupling perturbative supersystem treatment reproduces the exact bound-state energies and lifetimes (abstract and presumably §3–4) is load-bearing but lacks explicit quantitative validation. No tables or figures directly compare energies inside the gap or lifetime scalings between the exact model and the perturbative results, nor are error estimates or convergence with number of reaction coordinates provided; this leaves the weakest assumption untested.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative benchmarks are necessary to substantiate the reproduction claim. While the manuscript presents the exact solvability and the perturbative supersystem derivation, direct side-by-side numerical comparisons of energies and lifetimes, along with convergence studies, were not included. In the revised manuscript we will add a new figure and accompanying table in §4 that directly compares bound-state energies inside the gap and lifetime scalings between the exact model and the weak-coupling supersystem treatment for representative parameter sets. Error estimates will be provided, and we will demonstrate convergence with increasing numbers of reaction coordinates. This addition will make the validation explicit and address the concern. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2 (multiple band gaps)] The assertion that stability 'results from' the energy being inside the band gap (abstract) is presented as following directly from the perturbative treatment, but the manuscript does not derive or show how the gap condition emerges independently of the discretization parameters or coupling strength; a concrete check against the exact model's gap boundaries would strengthen this.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation shows stability when the energy lies inside the gap within the discretized supersystem but does not explicitly derive the independence of this condition from discretization details or coupling strength. In the revision we will expand the discussion in §4.2 to include a step-by-step derivation of how the gap-protection condition arises from the perturbative effective Hamiltonian in the continuum limit, demonstrating its independence from the specific choice of reaction-coordinate spacing. We will also add a direct comparison of the gap boundaries obtained from the perturbative treatment against those of the exact model to confirm consistency across the parameter regimes considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper starts from an exactly solvable bosonic model whose bound-state existence is stated as given, then applies a separate weak-coupling perturbative analysis to a supersystem constructed from parallel reaction coordinates that discretize the reservoir. The stability conclusion (energy inside the gap) follows from the spectral location relative to the externally defined band gap and does not reduce to a parameter fitted from the target quantity or to a self-citation whose content is itself the result being derived. The reproduction step is presented as a consistency check rather than an identity by construction, leaving the central claim with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of an exactly solvable bosonic model whose bound states are reproduced by a reaction-coordinate discretization of the reservoir spectral function together with standard weak-coupling perturbation theory. No numerical free parameters are introduced in the abstract, and no new physical entities beyond the modeling choice of reaction coordinates are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling perturbation theory applied to the supersystem of system plus reaction coordinates is valid and reproduces the exact bound-state spectrum.
    Invoked to obtain the stability condition from the energy location inside the gap.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5408 in / 1363 out tokens · 68925 ms · 2026-05-10T19:37:04.997160+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Oxford University Press, 01 2007

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione.The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 01 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    M. M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. S. Cubitt, and J. I. Cirac. As- sessing non-Markovian quantum dynamics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:150402, Oct 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems.Phys

    Heinz-Peter Breuer, Elsi-Mari Laine, and Jyrki Piilo. Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:210401, Nov 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Huelga, and Martin B

    ´Angel Rivas, Susana F. Huelga, and Martin B. Plenio. Entanglement and non-Markovianity of quantum evolu- tions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:050403, Jul 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Foundations and measures of quan- tum non-Markovianity.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 45(15):154001, jul 2012

    Heinz-Peter Breuer. Foundations and measures of quan- tum non-Markovianity.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 45(15):154001, jul 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    W. G. Unruh. Maintaining coherence in quantum com- puters.Physical Review A, 51:992–997, 1995

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    Reina, Luis Quiroga, and Neil F

    John H. Reina, Luis Quiroga, and Neil F. Johnson. De- coherence of quantum registers.Physical Review A, 65:032326, 2002

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    DiVincenzo

    David P. DiVincenzo. The physical implementation of quantum computation.Fortschritte der Physik, 48:771– 783, 2000

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    Nielsen and Isaac L

    Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang.Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Mahan.Many-particle physics

    Gerald D. Mahan.Many-particle physics. Springer, New York, 2nd edition, 1990

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    D. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov, and S. V. Shabanov. Bound states in the continuum in photonics.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:183902, May 2008

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Douglas Stone, John D

    Chia Wei Hsu, Bo Zhen, A. Douglas Stone, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Soljaˇ ci´ c. Bound states in the continuum.Nature Reviews Materials, 1(9):16048, 2016

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    S. Longhi. Bound states in the continuum in a single- level Fano-Anderson model.The European Physical Journal B, 57:45–51, 2007

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic band gap: Photon bound states and dressed atoms.Phys

    Sajeev John and Jian Wang. Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic band gap: Photon bound states and dressed atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 64:2418–2421, May 1990

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Kofman, G

    A.G. Kofman, G. Kurizki, and B. Sherman. Sponta- neous and induced atomic decay in photonic band struc- tures.Journal of Modern Optics, 41(2):353–384, 1994

    work page 1994

  16. [16]

    D. G. Angelakis, P. L. Knight, and E. Paspalakis. Pho- tonic crystals and inhibition of spontaneous emission: an introduction.Contemporary Physics, 45(4):303–318, 2004

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble. Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons. Rev. Mod. Phys., 90:031002, Aug 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Nonequilibrium Green’s function formalism and the problem of bound states.Phys

    Abhishek Dhar and Diptiman Sen. Nonequilibrium Green’s function formalism and the problem of bound states.Phys. Rev. B, 73:085119, Feb 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Bound states in ab initio ap- proaches to quantum transport: A time-dependent for- mulation.Phys

    Gianluca Stefanucci. Bound states in ab initio ap- proaches to quantum transport: A time-dependent for- mulation.Phys. Rev. B, 75:195115, May 2007

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    ´Etienne Jussiau, Masahiro Hasegawa, and Robert S. Whitney. Signature of the transition to a bound state in thermoelectric quantum transport.Phys. Rev. B, 100:115411, Sep 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Experimental observation of opti- cal bound states in the continuum.Phys

    Yonatan Plotnik, Or Peleg, Felix Dreisow, Matthias Heinrich, Stefan Nolte, Alexander Szameit, and Mordechai Segev. Experimental observation of opti- cal bound states in the continuum.Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:183901, Oct 2011

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Experimental evidence of the existence of bound states in the continuum and Fano resonances in solid-liquid layered media.Phys

    Madiha Amrani, Ilyasse Quotane, Cecile Ghouila-Houri, El Houssaine El Boudouti, Leonid Krutyansky, Bogdan Piwakowski, Philippe Pernod, Abdelkrim Talbi, and Bahram Djafari-Rouhani. Experimental evidence of the existence of bound states in the continuum and Fano resonances in solid-liquid layered media.Phys. Rev. Appl., 15:054046, May 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Martinazzo, B

    R. Martinazzo, B. Vacchini, K. H. Hughes, and I. Burghardt. Communication: Universal Markovian reduction of Brownian particle dynamics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(1):011101, 01 2011. 6

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    M. P. Woods, R. Groux, A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio. Mappings of open quantum systems onto chain representations and Markovian embeddings. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 55:032101, 2014

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in the strong coupling and non-Markovian regime based on a reaction coordinate mapping.New Journal of Physics, 18:073007, 2016

    Philipp Strasberg, Gernot Schaller, Neill Lambert, and Tobias Brandes. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in the strong coupling and non-Markovian regime based on a reaction coordinate mapping.New Journal of Physics, 18:073007, 2016

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Nazir and G

    A. Nazir and G. Schaller. The reaction coordinate map- ping in quantum thermodynamics. In F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, edi- tors,Thermodynamics in the quantum regime – Recent progress and outlook, Fundamental Theories of Physics, page 551. Springer, Cham, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Correa, Buqing Xu, and Benjamin Morris Ger- ardo Adesso

    Luis A. Correa, Buqing Xu, and Benjamin Morris Ger- ardo Adesso. Pushing the limits of the reaction- coordinate mapping.Journal of Chemical Physics, 151:094107, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Strong cou- pling effects in quantum thermal transport with the reaction coordinate method.New Journal of Physics, 23(6):063036, jun 2021

    Nicholas Anto-Sztrikacs and Dvira Segal. Strong cou- pling effects in quantum thermal transport with the reaction coordinate method.New Journal of Physics, 23(6):063036, jun 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, Matthew P. A. Fisher, Anupam Garg, and W. Zwerger. Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system.Rev. Mod. Phys., 59:1–85, Jan 1987

    work page 1987

  30. [30]

    Systematic perturbation theory for dynamical coarse- graining.Phys

    Gernot Schaller, Philipp Zedler, and Tobias Brandes. Systematic perturbation theory for dynamical coarse- graining.Phys. Rev. A, 79:032110, Mar 2009

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    General non- Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems.Phys

    Wei-Min Zhang, Ping-Yuan Lo, Heng-Na Xiong, Ma- tisse Wei-Yuan Tu, and Franco Nori. General non- Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:170402, Oct 2012

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Topp, Tobias Brandes, and Gernot Schaller

    Gabriel E. Topp, Tobias Brandes, and Gernot Schaller. Steady-state thermodynamics of non-interacting trans- port beyond weak coupling.Europhysics Letters, 110:67003, 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Robert J. Rubin. Momentum autocorrelation functions and energy transport in harmonic crystals containing isotopic defects.Phys. Rev., 131:964–989, Aug 1963

    work page 1963

  34. [34]

    Weiss.Quantum Dissipative Systems, volume 2 of Series of Modern Condensed Matter Physics

    U. Weiss.Quantum Dissipative Systems, volume 2 of Series of Modern Condensed Matter Physics. World Sci- entific, Singapore, 1993

    work page 1993

  35. [35]

    Hamil- tonian of mean force for damped quantum systems

    Stefanie Hilt, Benedikt Thomas, and Eric Lutz. Hamil- tonian of mean force for damped quantum systems. Phys. Rev. E, 84:031110, Sep 2011

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    G. M. Timofeev and A. S. Trushechkin. Hamilto- nian of mean force in the weak-coupling and high- temperature approximations and refined quantum mas- ter equations.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 37(20n21):2243021, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Burke, Goran Nakerst, and Masudul Haque

    Phillip C. Burke, Goran Nakerst, and Masudul Haque. Structure of the Hamiltonian of mean force.Phys. Rev. E, 110:014111, Jul 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Landi, Dario Poletti, and Gernot Schaller

    Gabriel T. Landi, Dario Poletti, and Gernot Schaller. Nonequilibrium boundary-driven quantum systems: Models, methods, and properties.Rev. Mod. Phys., 94:045006, Dec 2022

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Envi- ronmental dynamics, correlations, and the emergence of noncanonical equilibrium states in open quantum sys- tems.Phys

    Jake Iles-Smith, Neill Lambert, and Ahsan Nazir. Envi- ronmental dynamics, correlations, and the emergence of noncanonical equilibrium states in open quantum sys- tems.Phys. Rev. A, 90:032114, Sep 2014

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Dijkstra, Neill Lambert, and Ahsan Nazir

    Jake Iles-Smith, Arend G. Dijkstra, Neill Lambert, and Ahsan Nazir. Energy transfer in structured and un- structured environments: Master equations beyond the Born-Markov approximations.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 144(4):044110, 01 2016

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Per- formance of a quantum heat engine at strong reservoir coupling.Physical Review E, 95:032139, 2017

    David Newman, Florian Mintert, and Ahsan Nazir. Per- formance of a quantum heat engine at strong reservoir coupling.Physical Review E, 95:032139, 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    B. M. Garraway. Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity.Phys. Rev. A, 55:2290–2303, Mar 1997

    work page 1997

  43. [43]

    Linear-algebraic bath transformation for simulating complex open quan- tum systems.New Journal of Physics, 16(12):123008, dec 2014

    Joonsuk Huh, Sarah Mostame, Takatoshi Fujita, Man- Hong Yung, and Al´ an Aspuru-Guzik. Linear-algebraic bath transformation for simulating complex open quan- tum systems.New Journal of Physics, 16(12):123008, dec 2014

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Garraway, and Francesco Petruccione

    Graeme Pleasance, Barry M. Garraway, and Francesco Petruccione. Generalized theory of pseudomodes for ex- act descriptions of non-Markovian quantum processes. Phys. Rev. Research, 2:043058, Oct 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Schaller, F

    G. Schaller, F. Queisser, N. Szpak, J. K¨ onig, and R. Sch¨ utzhold. Environment-induced decay dynamics of antiferromagnetic order in Mott-Hubbard systems. Phys. Rev. B, 105:115139, Mar 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard- core bosons.Phys

    Marcos Rigol, Vanja Dunjko, Vladimir Yurovsky, and Maxim Olshanii. Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quantum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard- core bosons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:050405, Feb 2007

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Quench dy- namics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(6):064002, jun 2016

    Fabian H L Essler and Maurizio Fagotti. Quench dy- namics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(6):064002, jun 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Es- timate of equilibration times of quantum correlation functions in the thermodynamic limit based on Lanc- zos coefficients.Phys

    Jiaozi Wang, Merlin F¨ ullgraf, and Jochen Gemmer. Es- timate of equilibration times of quantum correlation functions in the thermodynamic limit based on Lanc- zos coefficients.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:010403, Jul 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Decoherence of his- tories: Chaotic versus integrable systems.Phys

    Jiaozi Wang and Philipp Strasberg. Decoherence of his- tories: Chaotic versus integrable systems.Phys. Rev. Lett., 134:220401, Jun 2025

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    A. G. Redfield.Advances in Magnetic and Optical Res- onance, chapter The Theory of Relaxation Processes, pages 1–32. Advances in Magnetic and Optical Reso- nance. Academic Press, New York, 1965

    work page 1965

  51. [51]

    Richard Hartmann and Walter T. Strunz. Accuracy as- sessment of perturbative master equations: Embracing nonpositivity.Phys. Rev. A, 101:012103, Jan 2020

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Henrich, Heinz-Peter Breuer, Jochen Gemmer, and Mathias Michel

    Hannu Wichterich, Markus J. Henrich, Heinz-Peter Breuer, Jochen Gemmer, and Mathias Michel. Mod- eling heat transport through completely positive maps. Physical Review E, 76(3):031115, 2007

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    M. G. Schultz and F. von Oppen. Quantum transport through nanostructures in the singular-coupling limit. Physical Review B, 80:033302, 2009

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    Phenomenological position and energy resolv- ing Lindblad approach to quantum kinetics.Phys

    Gediminas Kirˇ sanskas, Martin Francki´ e, and Andreas Wacker. Phenomenological position and energy resolv- ing Lindblad approach to quantum kinetics.Phys. Rev. B, 97:035432, Jan 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Relaxation dynamics in a Hubbard dimer coupled to fermionic baths: Phenomenological description and its microscopic foundation.Phys

    Eric Kleinherbers, Nikodem Szpak, J¨ urgen K¨ onig, and Ralf Sch¨ utzhold. Relaxation dynamics in a Hubbard dimer coupled to fermionic baths: Phenomenological description and its microscopic foundation.Phys. Rev. B, 101:125131, Mar 2020. 7

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Frederik Nathan and Mark S. Rudner. Universal Lind- blad equation for open quantum systems.Phys. Rev. B, 102:115109, Sep 2020

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Unified Gorini-Kossakowski- Lindblad-Sudarshan quantum master equation beyond the secular approximation.Phys

    Anton Trushechkin. Unified Gorini-Kossakowski- Lindblad-Sudarshan quantum master equation beyond the secular approximation.Phys. Rev. A, 103:062226, Jun 2021

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Khosravi, G

    E. Khosravi, G. Stefanucci, S. Kurth, and E.K.U. Gross. Bound states in time-dependent quantum transport: os- cillations and memory effects in current and density. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11:4535–4538, 2009

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    Electron pumping in the strong cou- pling and non-Markovian regime: A reaction coordinate mapping approach.Phys

    Sebastian Restrepo, Sina B¨ ohling, Javier Cerrillo, and Gernot Schaller. Electron pumping in the strong cou- pling and non-Markovian regime: A reaction coordinate mapping approach.Phys. Rev. B, 100:035109, Jul 2019

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Coupling-energy driven pumping through quantum dots: the role of coherences, 2026

    Lukas Litzba, Gernot Schaller, J¨ urgen K¨ onig, and Niko- dem Szpak. Coupling-energy driven pumping through quantum dots: the role of coherences, 2026

    work page 2026

  61. [61]

    Richard S. Varga. Gerschgorin disks, Brauer ovals of Cassini (a vindication), and Brualdi sets.Information, 4(2):171–178, 2001

    work page 2001

  62. [62]

    Open- quantum-system dynamics: Recovering positivity of the Redfield equation via the partial secular approximation

    Donato Farina and Vittorio Giovannetti. Open- quantum-system dynamics: Recovering positivity of the Redfield equation via the partial secular approximation. Phys. Rev. A, 100:012107, Jul 2019

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Local versus global master equa- tion with common and separate baths: superiority of the global approach in partial secular approximation.New Journal of Physics, 21:113045, 2019

    Marco Cattaneo, Gian Luca Giorgi, Sabrina Maniscalco, and Roberta Zambrini. Local versus global master equa- tion with common and separate baths: superiority of the global approach in partial secular approximation.New Journal of Physics, 21:113045, 2019. Appendix A: Exact solution

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Heisenberg picture Setting up the Heisenberg equations of motion, we obtain from (1) the equations for the operators in the Heisenberg picture (bold symbols) ˙x= Ωp, ˙p=− " Ω + 4 X k |hk|2 ωk # x−2 X k (hkbk +h ∗ kb† k), ˙bk =−ih ∗ kx−iω kbk , ˙b† k = +ihkx+ iω kb† k ,(A1) which can be solved by Laplace-transforming the oper- ators according to e.g.x(z) =...

    work page

  65. [65]

    Physical intuition suggests that the equationz 2 +Ωf(z) = 0 can only have solutions withℜz≤0 as otherwise, the system would become unstable

    Long-term limit: Existence of a bound state The asymptotic long-term dynamics heavily depends on the analytic properties of the functionz2+Ωf(z) that occurs in the denominators of (A3). Physical intuition suggests that the equationz 2 +Ωf(z) = 0 can only have solutions withℜz≤0 as otherwise, the system would become unstable. However, for the long-term dyn...

    work page

  66. [66]

    Ωe−iωkt ω2 k −Ωf(−iω k) + Ωg(t)−i Ωωk ωb h(t) ω2 b −ω 2 k # + X k 2h∗ kb† k× ×

    Long-term limit: Single-point operators In this section, we will always assume that the BS exists, i.e., that there is a single real solutionω b for which Ωf(±iω b) =ω 2 b (A10) holds. The simplified solution where this is not the case can by retrieved by simply leaving out the BS terms. Once a functional form forf(z) is established in (A3), we may obtain...

    work page

  67. [67]

    Long-term limit: Two-point operators To calculate the asymptotic long-term limit of two- point operators, we compute products of the expressions in the previous subsection and then take expectation values with respect to an initial product state with the reservoir taken in thermal equilibrium. For the second moment of the position operator we obtain x2 ∞ ...

    work page

  68. [68]

    Long-term and weak-coupling limit In this limit, we assume that Ω∈(0, ω c) and small Γ such that (5) is not obeyed. We make use of the well- known Dirac-δ-function representation πδ(x) = lim ϵ→0 ϵ x2 +ϵ 2 .(A17) 10 Then, we may rewrite the factors in the integrands of the second moments in position and momentum operators F(ω) = lim Γ→0 4Ω2Γ(ω) [ω2 −Ωf(−iω...

    work page

  69. [69]

    Single RC mapping We derive the mapping for a generic coupling operator (in the main text we useS=a+a †), demonstrating that the nature of the system is arbitary. We want to equate two representations of the same Hamiltonian (we absorb phases of the amplitudes in the reservoir operators and assumeh k, Hk ∈R) H=H S + X k ωk b† k + hk ωk S bk + hk ωk S (B1)...

    work page

  70. [70]

    This yields the relations λ2 1 Ω1 = X k h2 k ωk , λ1(B1 +B †

    and also the counter term for the energy ∆H S = P k h2 k ωk S2 = λ2 1 Ω1 S2 are the same. This yields the relations λ2 1 Ω1 = X k h2 k ωk , λ1(B1 +B †

    work page

  71. [71]

    = X k hk(bk +b † k),(B2) which can be fulfilled for the Bogoliubov transform bk = X q Λkq 1 2 r ωk Ωq + r Ωq ωk ! Bq + X q Λkq 1 2 r ωk Ωq − r Ωq ωk ! B† q ,(B3) when we fix the first row of the otherwise unspecified orthogonal transform Λ kq as Λ k1 = hk λ1 q ωk Ω1 . Inserting this in (B2) then yields in the continuum limit the RC energy and coupling str...

    work page

  72. [72]

    Rubin spectral function and single RC For the Rubin example (4) and a single RC we would obtain from the above mapping Ω 1 = ωc 2 ,λ 1 = √Γωc 4 and Γ1(ω) =ω s 1− ω2 ω2c Θ(ω)Θ(ωc −ω),(B14) i.e., up to a constant the Rubin spectral function does not change under the mapping. This transformed spec- tral function is upper-bounded Γ 1(ω)≤ω c/2, which would all...

    work page

  73. [73]

    Altogether, we may expand for strong couplings the supersystem operators 12 in the supersystem eigenmodes as a+a † = X q Λ1q s Ω ϵq (cq +c † q) ≈ − ω1/4 c Γ1/4 (c1 +c † 1 +c 2 +c †

    In contrast, for strong couplings we obtain Λ 11 →0 and Λ 12 → −1, such that mode-mixing is reduced. Altogether, we may expand for strong couplings the supersystem operators 12 in the supersystem eigenmodes as a+a † = X q Λ1q s Ω ϵq (cq +c † q) ≈ − ω1/4 c Γ1/4 (c1 +c † 1 +c 2 +c †

    work page

  74. [74]

    +O ( ω5/4 c Γ5/4 ) , B1 +B † 1 = X q Λ2q s Ω1 ϵq (cq +c † q) ≈ Γ1/4 ω1/4 c (c1 +c †

    work page

  75. [75]

    +O ( ω3/4 c Γ3/4 ) .(B18)

    work page

  76. [76]

    W eak variation expansion We may deliberately partition the reservoir modes into sub-reservoirs according to their energy, and intro- duce a spectral function for each sub-reservoir, that then has support over the energy range of that sub-reservoir only. For such a spectral function non-vanishing in the intervalI i = [ωa, ωb], the principal value integral...

    work page

  77. [77]

    Supersystem excitation energies Even in case of a harmonic system Ω =a †aone is left with the task of finding the supersystem excitation ener- gies, i.e., the eigenvalues of ˜HS that is given by the first line of Eq. (10). We can represent it with the rescaled position{ ˜X, ˜Xi}and momentum operators{ ˜P , ˜Pi}via a= q Ω 2 ˜X+ i√ 2Ω ˜PandB i = q Ωi 2 ˜Xi ...

    work page

  78. [78]

    1 1 0. . .0 ... ... ... 1 0. . .0   ,(B23) which allows to represent in the limit of strong couplings the corresponding eigenvector as Λ1,q ≈ ωc√ 2NΓΩ , . . . , ωc√ 2NΓΩ ,1− ω2 c 4ΓΩ ,(B24) i.e., it couples the original system dominantly to the BS 13 mode and weakly to theNband modes a≈ NX q=1 ωc√ 2NΓΩ h1 2 s Ω ϵq + r ϵq Ω cq + 1 2 s Ω ϵq − r ϵq Ω c...

    work page

  79. [79]

    NY i=1 (αi −σ) #

    Bounds on all eigenvalues The characteristic polynomial of a generic arrowhead matrix M=   α β 1 β2 . . . β1 α1 β2 α2 ... ...   (C1) is given by DN(σ) = (α−σ) NY i=1 (αi −σ)− NX i=1 Y j̸=i (αj −σ)β 2 i = " NY i=1 (αi −σ) #" α−σ− NX i=1 β2 i αi −σ # .(C2) Now specifically considering (13) and under the assump- tion that Ω2 1 <Ω 2 2 < . . . <Ω 2 N...

    work page

  80. [80]

    (Ω 2 N −Ω 2 1)<0, DN(Ω2

    =−4Ωλ 2 1Ω1(Ω2 2 −Ω 2 1). . .(Ω 2 N −Ω 2 1)<0, DN(Ω2

    work page

Showing first 80 references.