arxiv: 2604.08957 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall· quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

A scalable platform for nanometer-scale quantum confinement

Christina M. Spaegele , Mehdi Rezaee , Thomas Werkmeister , Soon Wei Daniel Lim , Kailyn Vaillancourt , Joon-Suh Park , Paul Chevalier , Ido Kaminer

show 3 more authors

Philip Kim Federico Capasso Michele Tamagnone

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

keywords nanofabricationquantum confinementgrapheneatomic layer depositionDirac peaksnanolaminate2D materialsband structure modulation

0 comments

The pith

A scalable nanofabrication platform achieves 1.75 nm in-plane features to enable quantum confinement in 2D materials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a top-down method that uses atomic layer deposition on spaced oxide nanofins to build large-area nanolaminates with periodicities below 10 nm and feature sizes as small as 1.75 nm. These structures serve as one-dimensional gate arrays that impose periodic electrostatic potentials on graphene. Transport measurements then reveal satellite Dirac peaks whose positions align with expected band-structure modulation from the nanoscale confinement. If the peaks truly reflect quantum confinement, the platform removes a key barrier to studying light-matter interactions at previously inaccessible length and frequency scales.

Core claim

We demonstrate a scalable nanofabrication platform capable of producing in-plane feature sizes down to 1.75 nm using precise thickness control of atomic layer deposition and widely spaced oxide nanofins to transform conventional ALD into a surface structuring method that produces nanolaminates with sub-10 nm periodicities over large areas. When integrated with graphene as a one-dimensional gate array, electron transport measurements show satellite Dirac peaks consistent with band-structure modulation, suggestive of quantum-confinement effects.

What carries the argument

The ALD-grown nanolaminate gate array that imposes a periodic electrostatic potential on two-dimensional materials to modulate their band structure.

If this is right

Enables periodic electrostatic gating with sub-10 nm repeat distances across wafer-scale areas.
Produces observable band-structure modulation in graphene consistent with quantum confinement.
Opens experimental access to nanoscale regimes of light-matter coupling in 2D systems.
Supports applications in short-wavelength optics, electronics, and polaritonics that require precise carrier control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same nanolaminate approach could be applied to other 2D materials such as transition-metal dichalcogenides to test whether confinement signatures appear in their transport or optical spectra.
Varying the ALD cycle number to tune the periodicity would provide a direct test of whether peak spacing scales with gate pitch as expected for confinement.
Large-area compatibility suggests the structures could be incorporated into photonic or electronic devices that require dense, uniform nanoscale patterning without serial lithography.

Load-bearing premise

The satellite Dirac peaks arise from quantum confinement induced by the nanolaminate gate array rather than from fabrication disorder or other artifacts.

What would settle it

Transport data from identical graphene devices fabricated without the nanolaminate gate array that show no satellite peaks, or high-resolution imaging that identifies disorder patterns capable of producing equivalent peaks.

read the original abstract

Overcoming the limitations of current nanofabrication techniques to achieve nanoscale feature sizes is essential for achieving new regimes of light-matter interactions at extreme frequencies and length scales. Here, we demonstrate a scalable nanofabrication platform capable of producing in-plane feature sizes down to 1.75 nm, pushing the boundaries of current top-down nanofabrication techniques. Using precise thickness control of atomic layer deposition (ALD) and employing widely spaced oxide nanofins, we transform conventional ALD into a surface structuring method that produces nanolaminates with sub-10 nm periodicities over large areas. The resulting nanostructures can be used as a one-dimensional gate array to control charge carriers in two-dimensional materials. As an initial demonstration, we integrate the platform with graphene and perform electron transport measurements. In the presence of the gate array enabled by the nanolaminate, we observe satellite Dirac peaks consistent with band-structure modulation, suggestive of quantum-confinement effects. Our platform paves the way for exploring previously inaccessible regimes of nanoscale light-matter interactions, holding significant promise for applications in short wavelength optics, electronics, and polaritonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New ALD-based route to sub-2 nm periodic gates on 2D materials with initial graphene transport data, but the link from satellite peaks to quantum confinement still needs controls.

read the letter

The paper's main contribution is a fabrication method that uses atomic layer deposition on widely spaced oxide nanofins to build nanolaminates with in-plane features down to 1.75 nm and sub-10 nm periodicities across large areas. They then use these as a one-dimensional gate array on graphene and report satellite Dirac peaks in transport measurements that they link to band-structure modulation from the periodic potential. The fabrication step itself looks practical and scalable, which is the part that stands out as genuinely new compared with standard ALD or top-down patterning. It gives experimentalists a route to impose small-period potentials without the usual limits on area or uniformity. The initial integration with graphene transport is a reasonable first demonstration and shows the platform can be made to work in a real device stack. The soft spot is the interpretation of those satellite peaks. Fabrication steps on graphene often create disorder, strain, or doping gradients that can produce extra features in transport data on their own. The abstract presents the result as suggestive rather than definitive, and the stress-test note correctly flags the lack of obvious controls such as bare-graphene reference devices or period-variation tests. Without those, it is difficult to be sure the peaks come from the intended quantum confinement rather than artifacts. The work is aimed at groups doing nanoscale photonics, polaritonics, or 2D electronics who need better tools for imposing small-scale potentials. Readers focused on fabrication techniques will get value from the method even if the physics claim stays preliminary. I would send it to peer review because the platform is concrete and the data are worth referee scrutiny, though the authors should expect requests for stronger controls on the transport interpretation.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a nanofabrication platform that combines atomic layer deposition with widely spaced oxide nanofins to produce nanolaminates featuring in-plane sizes down to 1.75 nm and sub-10 nm periodicities over large areas. This structure is positioned as a one-dimensional gate array for 2D materials; as an initial demonstration, the authors integrate it with graphene and report electron transport data showing satellite Dirac peaks that they describe as consistent with band-structure modulation and suggestive of quantum-confinement effects.

Significance. A scalable top-down route to sub-2 nm in-plane features would be valuable for accessing new regimes of quantum confinement and light-matter interactions in 2D systems. The fabrication approach itself appears technically interesting if the periodicity and feature-size claims are robustly documented. However, the central interpretive claim—that the observed satellite peaks arise from the periodic potential rather than fabrication-induced disorder—remains preliminary and untested by the controls needed to make the result load-bearing.

major comments (2)

[Transport measurements / graphene integration] Transport measurements section: the manuscript presents satellite Dirac peaks as 'consistent with band-structure modulation' but provides no control data on identical graphene devices without the nanolaminate, no period-variation series, and no quantitative comparison of peak positions to the expected mini-Dirac cone locations set by the measured periodicity. This omission leaves open the possibility that the features arise from strain, doping inhomogeneity, or edge disorder introduced during fabrication, directly weakening the attribution to quantum confinement.
[Results and discussion] Fabrication and characterization sections: while the abstract and title emphasize 'nanometer-scale quantum confinement,' the supporting evidence for actual carrier confinement (e.g., extracted confinement energy, comparison to theoretical mini-band structure, or spatial mapping) is not supplied; the claim therefore rests on suggestive transport features whose origin is not yet isolated.

minor comments (2)

[Title and abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'suggestive of quantum-confinement effects' is appropriately cautious, but the title asserts a platform 'for nanometer-scale quantum confinement'; the title should be revised to reflect the preliminary nature of the confinement evidence.
[Methods and figures] Figure captions and methods: several fabrication parameters (exact ALD cycle counts, nanofin spacing statistics, and graphene transfer details) are described only qualitatively; quantitative histograms or tables would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the interpretation of the transport data while clarifying the scope of the quantum-confinement claims. The fabrication platform remains the central contribution, with the graphene results serving as an initial demonstration.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Transport measurements section: the manuscript presents satellite Dirac peaks as 'consistent with band-structure modulation' but provides no control data on identical graphene devices without the nanolaminate, no period-variation series, and no quantitative comparison of peak positions to the expected mini-Dirac cone locations set by the measured periodicity. This omission leaves open the possibility that the features arise from strain, doping inhomogeneity, or edge disorder introduced during fabrication, directly weakening the attribution to quantum confinement.

Authors: We agree that additional controls are necessary to strengthen the attribution. In the revised manuscript we will include transport data from control graphene devices fabricated identically but without the nanolaminate; these controls do not exhibit satellite peaks. We will also add a period-variation series using nanolaminates with different measured periodicities (sub-10 nm range), showing systematic shifts in satellite-peak positions that track the superlattice period. Finally, we will overlay a quantitative comparison: the observed satellite Dirac-point locations match the expected mini-Brillouin-zone boundaries calculated from the AFM/SEM-determined periodicity and a simple Kronig-Penney model of the periodic potential. These additions will help rule out fabrication-induced disorder as the sole origin. revision: yes
Referee: Fabrication and characterization sections: while the abstract and title emphasize 'nanometer-scale quantum confinement,' the supporting evidence for actual carrier confinement (e.g., extracted confinement energy, comparison to theoretical mini-band structure, or spatial mapping) is not supplied; the claim therefore rests on suggestive transport features whose origin is not yet isolated.

Authors: The title and abstract frame the work around the scalable fabrication platform that achieves 1.75 nm in-plane features, with the graphene transport presented explicitly as an initial demonstration rather than a complete confinement study. We acknowledge that extracted confinement energies, full mini-band calculations, and spatial mapping are absent from the current version. In revision we will add a direct comparison of the measured satellite-peak spacing to a theoretical mini-band structure computed from the measured periodicity and estimated potential amplitude. We will also revise the discussion to emphasize that the transport features are suggestive and that further experiments (including spatial mapping) are required to fully quantify confinement. The core claims about the fabrication platform itself are unaffected. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental fabrication and transport measurements with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper presents a physical nanofabrication process using ALD and oxide nanofins to create nanolaminates, followed by integration with graphene and direct electron transport measurements. The central observation of satellite Dirac peaks is reported as 'consistent with' and 'suggestive of' band-structure modulation, without any mathematical derivation chain, parameter fitting, predictions from first principles, or self-referential equations. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. The work is self-contained as an empirical demonstration; attribution of peaks to quantum confinement is an interpretive claim open to experimental controls rather than a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters or invented entities; relies on established techniques and physics.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of atomic layer deposition uniformity and graphene band structure
The interpretation relies on known properties of ALD and Dirac cones in graphene.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1114 out tokens · 51182 ms · 2026-05-10T18:09:41.105510+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references

[1]

Joannopoulos, Steven G

John D. Joannopoulos, Steven G. Johnson, Joshua N. Winn, and Robert D. Meade,Photonic Crystals: Mold- ing the Flow of Light - Second Edition(Princeton Uni- versity Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008) p. 304

2008
[2]

Moiré patterns in 2D materials: a review,

Feng He, Yongjian Zhou, Zefang Ye, Sang-Hyeok Cho, Jihoon Jeong, Xianghai Meng, and Yaguo Wang, “Moiré patterns in 2D materials: a review,” ACS nano15, 5944– 5958 (2021)

2021
[3]

3D metamaterials,

Muamer Kadic, Graeme W Milton, Martin van Hecke, and Martin Wegener, “3D metamaterials,” Nature Re- views Physics1, 198–210 (2019)

2019
[4]

Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,

Nanfang Yu and Federico Capasso, “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces,” Nature materials13, 139–150 (2014)

2014
[5]

(Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005)

Charles Kittel,Introduction to solid state physics, 8th ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005)

2005
[6]

Re- cent advances in ultraviolet nanophotonics: from plas- monics and metamaterials to metasurfaces,

Dong Zhao, Zhelin Lin, Wenqi Zhu, Henri J Lezec, Ting Xu, Amit Agrawal, Cheng Zhang, and Kun Huang, “Re- cent advances in ultraviolet nanophotonics: from plas- monics and metamaterials to metasurfaces,” Nanopho- tonics10, 2283–2308 (2021)

2021
[7]

Free-electron–light interactions in nanophotonics,

Charles Roques-Carmes, Steven E Kooi, Yi Yang, Nicholas Rivera, Phillip D Keathley, John D Joannopou- los, Steven G Johnson, Ido Kaminer, Karl K Berggren, and Marin Soljačić, “Free-electron–light interactions in nanophotonics,” Applied Physics Reviews10, 011303 (2023)

2023
[8]

Valleytronics in 2D materials,

John R Schaibley, Hongyi Yu, Genevieve Clark, Pasqual Rivera, Jason S Ross, Kyle L Seyler, Wang Yao, and Xiaodong Xu, “Valleytronics in 2D materials,” Nature Reviews Materials1, 1–15 (2016)

2016
[9]

2D heterostructures for ubiquitous electronics and optoelectronics: principles, opportuni- ties, and challenges,

Phuong V Pham, Srikrishna Chanakya Bodepudi, Khur- ram Shehzad, Yuan Liu, Yang Xu, Bin Yu, and Xiangfeng Duan, “2D heterostructures for ubiquitous electronics and optoelectronics: principles, opportuni- ties, and challenges,” Chemical reviews122, 6514–6613 (2022)

2022
[10]

Field-effect controlled surface super- lattices,

Jörg P Kotthaus, “Field-effect controlled surface super- lattices,” inGranular Nanoelectronics(Springer, 1991) pp. 85–102. 10

1991
[11]

Engineering high quality graphene superlattices via ion milled ultra- thin etching masks,

David Barcons Ruiz, Hanan Herzig Sheinfux, Rebecca Hoffmann, Iacopo Torre, Hitesh Agarwal, Roshan Kr- ishna Kumar, Lorenzo Vistoli, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Adrian Bachtold,et al., “Engineering high quality graphene superlattices via ion milled ultra- thin etching masks,” Nature Communications13, 6926 (2022)

2022
[12]

Sub-wavelength optical lattice in 2D mate- rials,

Supratik Sarkar, Mahmoud Jalali Mehrabad, Daniel G Suárez-Forero, Liuxin Gu, Christopher J Flower, Lida Xu, KenjiWatanabe, TakashiTaniguchi, SujiPark, Houk Jang,et al., “Sub-wavelength optical lattice in 2D mate- rials,” Science Advances11, eadv2023 (2025)

2025
[13]

Freeform electronic and photonic land- scapes in hexagonal boron nitride,

Nolan Lassaline, Deepankur Thureja, Thibault Chervy, Daniel Petter, Puneet A Murthy, Armin W Knoll, and David J Norris, “Freeform electronic and photonic land- scapes in hexagonal boron nitride,” Nano Letters21, 8175–8181 (2021)

2021
[14]

Strain modulated superlat- tices in graphene,

Riju Banerjee, Viet-Hung Nguyen, Tomotaroh Granzier- Nakajima, Lavish Pabbi, Aurelien Lherbier, Anna Ruth Binion, Jean-Christophe Charlier, Mauricio Terrones, and Eric William Hudson, “Strain modulated superlat- tices in graphene,” Nano letters20, 3113–3121 (2020)

2020
[15]

Towards hybrid superlattices in graphene,

Zhengzong Sun, Cary L Pint, Daniela C Marcano, Chen- guang Zhang, Jun Yao, Gedeng Ruan, Zheng Yan, Yu Zhu, Robert H Hauge, and James M Tour, “Towards hybrid superlattices in graphene,” Nature Communica- tions2, 559 (2011)

2011
[16]

Gate-tunable two-dimensional superlattices in graphene,

Robin Huber, Ming-Hao Liu, Szu-Chao Chen, Martin Drienovsky, Andreas Sandner, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Klaus Richter, Dieter Weiss, and Jonathan Eroms, “Gate-tunable two-dimensional superlattices in graphene,” Nano letters20, 8046–8052 (2020)

2020
[17]

Anisotropic band flattening in graphene with one-dimensional superlattices,

Yutao Li, Scott Dietrich, Carlos Forsythe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Pilkyung Moon, and Cory R Dean, “Anisotropic band flattening in graphene with one-dimensional superlattices,” Nature Nanotech- nology16, 525–530 (2021)

2021
[18]

Band structure engineering of 2D materials using patterned di- electric superlattices,

Carlos Forsythe, Xiaodong Zhou, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Abhay Pasupathy, Pilkyung Moon, Mikito Koshino, Philip Kim, and Cory R Dean, “Band structure engineering of 2D materials using patterned di- electric superlattices,” Nature nanotechnology13, 566– 571 (2018)

2018
[19]

Landaulevelsandquantum hall effect in graphene superlattices,

Cheol-Hwan Park, Young-Woo Son, Li Yang, Marvin L Cohen, andStevenGLouie,“Landaulevelsandquantum hall effect in graphene superlattices,” Physical review let- ters103, 046808 (2009)

2009
[20]

Emerging zero modes for graphene in a periodic potential,

L Brey and HA Fertig, “Emerging zero modes for graphene in a periodic potential,” Physical Review Let- ters103, 046809 (2009)

2009
[21]

Anisotropic behaviours of massless dirac fermions in graphene under periodic po- tentials,

Cheol-Hwan Park, Li Yang, Young-Woo Son, Marvin L Cohen, and Steven G Louie, “Anisotropic behaviours of massless dirac fermions in graphene under periodic po- tentials,” Nature Physics4, 213–217 (2008)

2008
[22]

Gate- tunable flat bands in van der Waals patterned dielectric superlattices,

Li-kun Shi, Jing Ma, and Justin CW Song, “Gate- tunable flat bands in van der Waals patterned dielectric superlattices,” 2D Materials7, 015028 (2020)

2020
[23]

Unconventional superconductivity in magic- angle graphene superlattices,

Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watanabe, TakashiTaniguchi, EfthimiosKaxiras, andPabloJarillo- Herrero, “Unconventional superconductivity in magic- angle graphene superlattices,” Nature556, 43–50 (2018)

2018
[24]

Extradirac points in the energy spectrum for superlattices on single- layer graphene,

MBarbier, PVasilopoulos, andFMPeeters,“Extradirac points in the energy spectrum for superlattices on single- layer graphene,” Physical Review B81, 075438 (2010)

2010
[25]

Evolution in lithography techniques: Microlithog- raphy to nanolithography,

Ekta Sharma, Reena Rathi, Jaya Misharwal, Bhavya Sinhmar, Suman Kumari, Jasvir Dalal, and Anand Ku- mar, “Evolution in lithography techniques: Microlithog- raphy to nanolithography,” Nanomaterials12, 2754 (2022)

2022
[26]

Probing miniband structure and hofstadter butterfly in gated graphene superlattices via magneto- transport,

Alina Mreńca-Kolasińska, Szu-Chao Chen, and Ming- Hao Liu, “Probing miniband structure and hofstadter butterfly in gated graphene superlattices via magneto- transport,” npj 2D Materials and Applications7, 64 (2023)

2023
[27]

Mack,Fundamental Principles of Optical Lithography: The Science of Microfabrication(John Wi- ley & Sons, 2008)

Chris A. Mack,Fundamental Principles of Optical Lithography: The Science of Microfabrication(John Wi- ley & Sons, 2008)

2008
[28]

Electron beam lithography: resolution lim- its and applications,

C. Vieu, F. Carcenac, A. Pépin, Y. Chen, M. Mejias, A. Lebib, L. Manin-Ferlazzo, L. Couraud, and H. Launois, “Electron beam lithography: resolution lim- its and applications,” Applied Surface Science164, 111– 117 (2000)

2000
[29]

Roadmap for focused ion beam tech- nologies,

Katja Höflich, Gernot Hobler, Francesco Iacopi, Gert Hlawacek,et al., “Roadmap for focused ion beam tech- nologies,” Applied Physics Reviews10, 041311 (2023)

2023
[30]

Atomic layer deposition: an overview,

Steven M. George, “Atomic layer deposition: an overview,” Chemical Reviews110, 111–131 (2010)

2010
[31]

Molecular beam epitaxy,

John R. Arthur, “Molecular beam epitaxy,” Surface Sci- ence500, 189–217 (2002)

2002
[32]

Line-edge roughness and the ultimate limitsoflithography,

Chris A. Mack, “Line-edge roughness and the ultimate limitsoflithography,” JournalofMicro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS10, 033019 (2011)

2011
[33]

High resolution optical lithography or high throughput electron beam lithography: The techni- cal struggle from the micro- to the nano-fabrication evo- lution,

Shinji Okazaki, “High resolution optical lithography or high throughput electron beam lithography: The techni- cal struggle from the micro- to the nano-fabrication evo- lution,” Microelectronic Engineering133, 23–35 (2015)

2015
[34]

A brief review of atomic layer deposition: from fundamentals to applications,

R. W. Johnson, A. Hultqvist, and S. F. Bent, “A brief review of atomic layer deposition: from fundamentals to applications,” Materials Today17, 236–246 (2014)

2014
[35]

Energy levels and wave func- tions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational mag- netic fields,

Douglas R Hofstadter, “Energy levels and wave func- tions of bloch electrons in rational and irrational mag- netic fields,” Physical review B14, 2239 (1976)

1976
[36]

Electrically tunable quantum confinement of neu- tral excitons,

Deepankur Thureja, Atac Imamoglu, Tomasz Smoleński, Ivan Amelio, Alexander Popert, Thibault Chervy, Xi- aobo Lu, Song Liu, Katayun Barmak, Kenji Watanabe, et al., “Electrically tunable quantum confinement of neu- tral excitons,” Nature606, 298–304 (2022)

2022
[37]

Topological quantum optics in two- dimensional atomic arrays,

Janos Perczel, Johannes Borregaard, Darrick E Chang, Hannes Pichler, Susanne F Yelin, Peter Zoller, and Mikhail D Lukin, “Topological quantum optics in two- dimensional atomic arrays,” Physical review letters119, 023603 (2017)

2017
[38]

Topological exciton bands in moiré heterojunctions,

Fengcheng Wu, Timothy Lovorn, and A. H. MacDonald, “Topological exciton bands in moiré heterojunctions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 147401 (2017)

2017
[39]

Excitonic devices with van der Waals het- erostructures: valleytronics meets twistronics,

Alberto Ciarrocchi, Fedele Tagarelli, Ahmet Avsar, and Andras Kis, “Excitonic devices with van der Waals het- erostructures: valleytronics meets twistronics,” Nature Reviews Materials7, 449–464 (2022)

2022
[40]

In- plane anisotropy of graphene by strong interlayer inter- actions with van der Waals epitaxially grown moo3,

Hangyel Kim, Jong Hun Kim, Jungcheol Kim, Jejune Park, Kwanghee Park, Ji-Hwan Baek, June-Chul Shin, Hyeongseok Lee, Jangyup Son, Sunmin Ryu,et al., “In- plane anisotropy of graphene by strong interlayer inter- actions with van der Waals epitaxially grown moo3,” Sci- ence Advances9, eadg6696 (2023)

2023
[41]

Moiré excitons: From programmable quan- tum emitter arrays to spin-orbit–coupled artificial lat- 11 tices,

Hongyi Yu, Gui-Bin Liu, Jianju Tang, Xiaodong Xu, and Wang Yao, “Moiré excitons: From programmable quan- tum emitter arrays to spin-orbit–coupled artificial lat- 11 tices,” Science advances3, e1701696 (2017)

2017
[42]

Extreme ultraviolet metalens by vacuum guiding,

Marcus Ossiander, Maryna Leonidivna Meretska, Hana Kristin Hampel, Soon Wei Daniel Lim, Nico Knefz, Thomas Jauk, Federico Capasso, and Martin Schultze, “Extreme ultraviolet metalens by vacuum guiding,” Sci- ence380, 59–63 (2023)

2023
[43]

Extreme ultraviolet lithography: A review,

Banqiu Wu and Ajay Kumar, “Extreme ultraviolet lithography: A review,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Struc- tures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena25, 1743–1761 (2007)

2007
[44]

Light gen- erationviaquantuminteractionofelectronswithperiodic nanostructures,

Shai Tsesses, Guy Bartal, and Ido Kaminer, “Light gen- erationviaquantuminteractionofelectronswithperiodic nanostructures,” Physical Review A95, 013832 (2017)

2017
[45]

Quantum recoil in free-electron inter- actions with atomic lattices,

Sunchao Huang, Ruihuan Duan, Nikhil Pramanik, Ja- son Scott Herrin, Chris Boothroyd, Zheng Liu, and Liang Jie Wong, “Quantum recoil in free-electron inter- actions with atomic lattices,” Nature Photonics17, 224– 230 (2023)

2023
[46]

Residual quantum coherent electrontransportindopedgrapheneleads,

Raphaëlle Delagrange, Gaëlle Le Breton, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Preden Roulleau, Patrice Roche, and François D Parmentier, “Residual quantum coherent electrontransportindopedgrapheneleads,” PhysicalRe- view B110, L201408 (2024)

2024
[47]

Cleaved edge overgrowth for quan- tum wire fabrication,

Loren Pfeiffer, HL Störmer, KW Baldwin, KW West, AR Goni, A Pinczuk, RC Ashoori, MM Dignam, and Werner Wegscheider, “Cleaved edge overgrowth for quan- tum wire fabrication,” Journal of crystal growth127, 849–857 (1993)

1993
[48]

Luis EF Foa Torres, Stephan Roche, and Jean- Christophe Charlier,Introduction to graphene-based nanomaterials: from electronic structure to quantum transport(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

2014
[49]

Graphene-based voltage-tunable coherent terahertz emitter,

Sergey A Mikhailov, “Graphene-based voltage-tunable coherent terahertz emitter,” Physical Review B87, 115405 (2013)

2013
[50]

Highlyanisotropicspintransportinultrathinblack phosphorus,

LukeCording, JiaweiLiu, JunYouTan, KenjiWatanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ahmet Avsar, and Barbaros Özyil- maz,“Highlyanisotropicspintransportinultrathinblack phosphorus,” Nature Materials23, 479–485 (2024)

2024
[51]

Polari- tons in van der Waals materials,

DN Basov, MM Fogler, and FJ García de Abajo, “Polari- tons in van der Waals materials,” Science354, aag1992 (2016)

2016