pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08968 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Probing the Kinematic Dipole with LISA: an analytical treatment

Jacopo Fumagalli , Giulia Cusin , Cyril Pitrou , Gianmassimo Tasinato This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords kinematic dipolestochastic gravitational wavesLISAcosmic anisotropiesanalytic responseFisher forecasts
0
0 comments X

The pith

LISA can extract our peculiar velocity from a symmetry-fixed dipolar pattern in the stochastic gravitational wave background.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper provides a fully analytic derivation of LISA's response to the dipole anisotropy in the gravitational wave sky that arises because the Solar System moves relative to the cosmic rest frame. This response reduces to one frequency-dependent function set entirely by symmetry, and the authors compute its form throughout the LISA band. They construct an optimal estimator and run Fisher forecasts that translate this into concrete amplitude thresholds needed for detection. The work also shows how the dipole could help separate a primordial signal from galactic foregrounds or instrumental features that mimic it.

Core claim

The dipolar response of LISA to a kinematic dipole in the stochastic gravitational-wave background is governed by a single frequency-dependent function fixed by symmetry; its explicit behavior is computed across the LISA band, an optimal estimator is constructed, and Fisher forecasts give the minimum amplitudes required for detection under scale-invariant and more general spectra.

What carries the argument

The single symmetry-derived frequency-dependent response function that encodes LISA's sensitivity to the kinematic dipole modulation.

If this is right

  • Detection is possible for scale-invariant backgrounds once the amplitude reaches roughly 5 times 10 to the minus 8 in fiducial LISA.
  • An order-of-magnitude reduction in instrumental noise lowers the threshold to roughly 5 times 10 to the minus 10.
  • Backgrounds with non-scale-invariant frequency profiles are easier to detect.
  • The dipole signal offers a route to reduce degeneracies when galactic foregrounds or noise features closely resemble the isotropic component.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same analytic approach could be adapted to other space-based interferometer concepts to cross-check velocity measurements obtained from electromagnetic probes.
  • If future data reveal a dipole whose amplitude or frequency shape differs from the kinematic expectation, it would indicate additional sources of anisotropy beyond our motion.
  • Combining the dipole measurement with other LISA observables could tighten constraints on the overall energy density of the background even in the presence of strong foregrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The stochastic gravitational wave background is statistically isotropic in the cosmic rest frame and that noise and galactic foregrounds can be modeled well enough to isolate the dipole.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the frequency dependence of any detected dipole deviates from the predicted single function, or a null result at amplitudes well above the forecasted threshold when an independent estimate of the background strength is available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08968 by Cyril Pitrou, Gianmassimo Tasinato, Giulia Cusin, Jacopo Fumagalli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left panel: Response functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sensitivity curves for the GW monopole. The blue lines correspond to the estimates based on ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Error on the modulus of the peculiar velocity (assuming/not assuming the direction fixed) as function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left: Corner plot for the components of the peculiar velocity in Galactic coordinates, assuming a flat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Directional reconstruction of the peculiar-velocity unit vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Overlapping signals. Left: Solid lines denote the primordial monopole component of a signal with peak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Marginalised variance of the logarithmic amplitude of the primordial signal, in the presence of degeneracy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Marginalised variance of the logarithmic amplitude of the primordial signal, in the presence of degeneracy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Degenerate noise component. We consider a log-normal template for the signal, Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Full corner plot for the benchmark model shown in the left panel of Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The motion of the Solar System with respect to the cosmic rest frame induces a kinematic dipole in the stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB). Detecting this signal with space-based interferometers would provide an independent measurement of our peculiar velocity and a GW probe of cosmic anisotropies. We present a fully analytic derivation of the response of the \emph{Laser Interferometer Space Antenna} (LISA) to a kinematic dipole, and construct an optimal estimator for its detection. We show that the dipolar response is governed by a single frequency-dependent function fixed by symmetry, and we compute its behaviour across the LISA band. Using Fisher forecasts, we find that for a scale-invariant background detectability requires $h^2\Omega_{\rm GW} \gtrsim 5\times 10^{-8}$ for \emph{fiducial} LISA, and $h^2\Omega_{\rm GW} \gtrsim 5\times 10^{-10}$ for a detector with characteristic instrumental-noise amplitudes improved by an order of magnitude. Prospects are more favorable for signals with richer frequency profile. We also explore the potential of the kinematic dipole to break degeneracies, particularly in the presence of strong galactic foregrounds or noise features that closely mimic the primordial signal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fully analytic derivation of the LISA interferometer's response to a kinematic dipole in an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB), arising from the Solar System's peculiar velocity relative to the cosmic rest frame. It shows that the dipolar response is captured by a single frequency-dependent function determined solely by symmetry, computes its explicit form across the LISA frequency range, constructs an optimal estimator for its detection, and performs Fisher-matrix forecasts. The forecasts indicate that for a scale-invariant GWB spectrum, detection requires h²Ω_GW ≳ 5×10^{-8} for standard LISA sensitivity, with improved prospects for detectors with lower noise or for backgrounds with non-flat spectra. The work also examines the dipole's utility in mitigating degeneracies with galactic foregrounds.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper makes a significant contribution by providing a symmetry-based analytic framework that simplifies the analysis of anisotropic GW signals with LISA. This approach avoids the need for extensive numerical simulations for the dipole component and yields concrete sensitivity thresholds. The explicit computation of the response function and the optimal estimator are particularly useful for planning observations and data analysis pipelines. By addressing the impact of foregrounds, it strengthens the case for using LISA to probe cosmology beyond isotropy. The absence of additional free parameters in the derivation is a notable strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'for fiducial LISA' is used without an immediate definition or reference to the specific noise curve parameters; adding a brief parenthetical or footnote would improve immediate readability.
  2. The symmetry reduction to a single frequency-dependent function is elegant, but a short explicit statement of the coordinate frames and averaging procedure (e.g., over LISA's orbital motion) in the main derivation section would help readers verify the reduction without re-deriving it.
  3. Fisher forecasts section: while the scale-invariant case is presented, the manuscript would benefit from a brief robustness check showing how the quoted thresholds shift under a mild spectral tilt (e.g., n_T = ±0.1) to illustrate the 'richer frequency profile' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript, including the recommendation for minor revision. The referee summary accurately captures the analytic framework, symmetry-based response function, optimal estimator, and Fisher forecasts presented in the work. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Analytic symmetry-based derivation is self-contained with no circularity

full rationale

The paper derives the LISA dipolar response analytically from symmetry arguments, showing it is governed by a single frequency-dependent function fixed by symmetry and computing its explicit behavior. This reduction is presented as a first-principles result rather than any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. Fisher forecasts for detectability thresholds are constructed under explicitly stated assumptions (scale-invariant spectrum, noise/foreground modeling) without reducing the central prediction to the inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatz smuggling are identified in the derivation chain. The overall structure is internally consistent and independent once the isotropy assumption is granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symmetry properties of an isotropic stochastic background in the cosmic rest frame and the known LISA geometry; no new entities are introduced. The amplitude threshold is a forecast output rather than a fitted parameter.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stochastic gravitational-wave background is statistically isotropic in the cosmic rest frame
    Invoked to define the kinematic dipole induced by observer motion
  • domain assumption LISA response can be computed from symmetry without full numerical integration
    Basis for claiming the response reduces to a single frequency-dependent function

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1399 out tokens · 81297 ms · 2026-05-10T17:42:53.970587+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Constraining cosmological and galactic parameters Let us assume we want to constrain parameters of an extragalactic background components. Then for the signal-signal part of the Fisher we get (with upper case indices running over the diagonal channels A, EandT) Fpq =T X O Z +∞ 0 df RO(f) MO +N O 2 ∂p ¯I(f)∂ q ¯I(f) (C1) +T X OO′ Z +∞ 0 df 1 (MO +N O)(MO′ ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The situation is very similar to what presented in the previous section

    Constraining noise and cosmological parameters Let us focus on constraining extragalactic signal and noise parameters. The situation is very similar to what presented in the previous section. The signal-signal block is given by (C4). The off-diagonal block Fpα =T X O Z +∞ 0 df 1 (MO +N O)2 RO(f)∂ p ¯I(f)∂ αNO(f),(C7) and finally the noise block Fαβ =T X O...

    work page

  3. [3]

    D. J. Fixsen et al. Cosmic microwave background dipole spectrum measured by the COBE FIRAS.Astrophys. J., 420:445, 1994

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, John C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright. The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set.Astrophys. J., 473:576, 1996

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove.Astron. Astrophys., 571:A27, 2014

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    G. F. R. Ellis and J. E. Baldwin. On the expected anisotropy of radio source counts.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 206(2):377–381, 1984

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    Detection of the velocity dipole in the radio galaxies of the nrao vla sky survey

    Chris Blake and Jasper Wall. Detection of the velocity dipole in the radio galaxies of the nrao vla sky survey. Nature, 416:150–152, 2002

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    Dipoles in the Sky.Mon

    Cameron Gibelyou and Dragan Huterer. Dipoles in the Sky.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 427:1994–2021, 2012

    work page 1994

  10. [10]

    Secrest, Sebastian von Hausegger, Mohamed Rameez, Roya Mohayaee, Subir Sarkar, and Jacques Colin

    Nathan J. Secrest, Sebastian von Hausegger, Mohamed Rameez, Roya Mohayaee, Subir Sarkar, and Jacques Colin. A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars.Astrophys. J. Lett., 908(2):L51, 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Lewis, and Brendon J

    Lawrence Dam, Geraint F. Lewis, and Brendon J. Brewer. Testing the cosmological principle with CatWISE quasars: a bayesian analysis of the number-count dipole.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 525(1):231–245, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Secrest, Sebastian von Hausegger, Mohamed Rameez, Roya Mohayaee, and Subir Sarkar

    Nathan J. Secrest, Sebastian von Hausegger, Mohamed Rameez, Roya Mohayaee, and Subir Sarkar. A Challenge to the Standard Cosmological Model.Astrophys. J. Lett., 937(2):L31, 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Colloquium: The cosmic dipole anomaly.Rev

    Nathan Secrest, Sebastian von Hausegger, Mohamed Rameez, Roya Mohayaee, and Subir Sarkar. Colloquium: The cosmic dipole anomaly.Rev. Mod. Phys., 97(4):041001, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    On the kinematic cosmic dipole tension.Mon

    Charles Dalang and Camille Bonvin. On the kinematic cosmic dipole tension.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 512(3):3895–3905, 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Theoretical Systematics in Testing the Cosmological Principle with the Kinematic Quasar Dipole.Astrophys

    Caroline Guandalin, Jade Piat, Chris Clarkson, and Roy Maartens. Theoretical Systematics in Testing the Cosmological Principle with the Kinematic Quasar Dipole.Astrophys. J., 953(2):144, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Boosting gravitational waves: a review of kinematic effects on amplitude, polarization, frequency and energy density.Class

    Giulia Cusin, Cyril Pitrou, Camille Bonvin, Aur´ elien Barrau, and Killian Martineau. Boosting gravitational waves: a review of kinematic effects on amplitude, polarization, frequency and energy density.Class. Quant. Grav., 41(22):225006, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Mastrogiovanni, C

    S. Mastrogiovanni, C. Bonvin, G. Cusin, and S. Foffa. Detection and estimation of the cosmic dipole with the einstein telescope and cosmic explorer.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 521(1):984–994, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Grimm, M

    N. Grimm, M. Pijnenburg, S. Mastrogiovanni, C. Bonvin, S. Foffa, and G. Cusin. Combining chirp mass, luminosity distance, and sky localization from gravitational wave events to detect the cosmic dipole.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 526(3):4673–4689, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA

    Nicola Bartolo et al. Probing anisotropies of the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with LISA. JCAP, 11:009, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Doppler boosting the stochastic gravitational wave background

    Giulia Cusin and Gianmassimo Tasinato. Doppler boosting the stochastic gravitational wave background. JCAP, 08(08):036, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Measuring the net circular polarization of the stochastic gravitational wave background with interferometers.JCAP, 05:028, 2020

    Valerie Domcke, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Marco Peloso, Mauro Pieroni, Angelo Ricciardone, Lorenzo Sorbo, and Gianmassimo Tasinato. Measuring the net circular polarization of the stochastic gravitational wave background with interferometers.JCAP, 05:028, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    The dipole of the astrophysical gravitational-wave background.JCAP, 11:040, 2022

    Lorenzo Valbusa Dall’Armi, Angelo Ricciardone, and Daniele Bertacca. The dipole of the astrophysical gravitational-wave background.JCAP, 11:040, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Jenkins, Joseph D

    Adrian Ka-Wai Chung, Alexander C. Jenkins, Joseph D. Romano, and Mairi Sakellariadou. Targeted search for the kinematic dipole of the gravitational-wave background.Phys. Rev. D, 106(8):082005, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Response of the Einstein Telescope to Doppler anisotropies.Phys

    Debika Chowdhury, Gianmassimo Tasinato, and Ivonne Zavala. Response of the Einstein Telescope to Doppler anisotropies.Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):083516, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Prospects for detecting anisotropies and polarization of the stochastic gravitational wave background with ground-based detectors.JCAP, 08:053, 2023

    Giorgio Mentasti, Carlo Contaldi, and Marco Peloso. Prospects for detecting anisotropies and polarization of the stochastic gravitational wave background with ground-based detectors.JCAP, 08:053, 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Kinematic anisotropies and pulsar timing arrays.Phys

    Gianmassimo Tasinato. Kinematic anisotropies and pulsar timing arrays.Phys. Rev. D, 108(10):103521, 2023

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Angular power spectra of anisotropic stochastic gravitational wave background: Developing statistical methods and analyzing data from ground- based detectors.Phys

    Deepali Agarwal, Jishnu Suresh, Sanjit Mitra, and Anirban Ain. Angular power spectra of anisotropic stochastic gravitational wave background: Developing statistical methods and analyzing data from ground- based detectors.Phys. Rev. D, 108(2):023011, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Anisotropy in the Gravitational-wave 28 Background.Astrophys

    Gabriella Agazie et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Anisotropy in the Gravitational-wave 28 Background.Astrophys. J. Lett., 956(1):L3, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    N. M. Jim´ enez Cruz, Ameek Malhotra, Gianmassimo Tasinato, and Ivonne Zavala. Astrometry meets pulsar timing arrays: Synergies for gravitational wave detection.Phys. Rev. D, 112(8):083558, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    N. M. Jim´ enez Cruz, Ameek Malhotra, Gianmassimo Tasinato, and Ivonne Zavala. Measuring the circular polarization of gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays.Phys. Rev. D, 110(10):103505, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    N. M. Jim´ enez Cruz, Ameek Malhotra, Gianmassimo Tasinato, and Ivonne Zavala. Measuring kinematic anisotropies with pulsar timing arrays.Phys. Rev. D, 110(6):063526, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Michael Ebersold, Tania Regimbau, and Nelson Christensen. Next-generation global gravitational-wave detec- tor network: Impact of detector orientation on compact binary coalescence and stochastic gravitational-wave background searches.Phys. Rev. D, 110(12):122006, 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Mapping anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave background with TianQin.Phys

    Zhi-Yuan Li, Zheng-Cheng Liang, En-Kun Li, Jian-dong Zhang, and Yi-Ming Hu. Mapping anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave background with TianQin.Phys. Rev. D, 111(10):102007, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Pulsar timing array sensitivity to anisotropies in the gravitational wave background.Phys

    Paul Frederik Depta, Valerie Domcke, Gabriele Franciolini, and Mauro Pieroni. Pulsar timing array sensitivity to anisotropies in the gravitational wave background.Phys. Rev. D, 111(8):083039, 2025

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Contaldi, and Marco Peloso

    Giorgio Mentasti, Carlo R. Contaldi, and Marco Peloso. Strong scale-dependence does not enhance the kinematic boosting of gravitational wave backgrounds. 7 2025

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    A. G. Abac et al. Directional Search for Persistent Gravitational Waves: Results from the First Part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s Fourth Observing Run. 10 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Maximilian Bl¨ umke, Kai Schmitz, Tobias Schr¨ oder, Deepali Agarwal, and Joseph D. Romano. Kinematic Anisotropies in PTA Observations: Analytical Toolkit.Symmetry, 18:355, 2026

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    Note on pulsar timing array correlation functions induced by peculiar velocities

    Neha Anil Kumar, Keisuke Inomata, and Marc Kamionkowski. Note on pulsar timing array correlation functions induced by peculiar velocities. 1 2026

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Contaldi

    Carlo R. Contaldi. Anisotropies of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds: A Line Of Sight Approach.Phys. Lett. B, 771:9–12, 2017

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, A. Riotto, and G. Tasinato. Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity of the Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background.Phys. Rev. D, 100(12):121501, 2019

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Characterizing the cosmological gravitational wave background: Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity.Phys

    Nicola Bartolo, Daniele Bertacca, Sabino Matarrese, Marco Peloso, Angelo Ricciardone, Antonio Riotto, and Gianmassimo Tasinato. Characterizing the cosmological gravitational wave background: Anisotropies and non-Gaussianity.Phys. Rev. D, 102(2):023527, 2020

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Lim, and Gi- anmassimo Tasinato

    Peter Adshead, Niayesh Afshordi, Emanuela Dimastrogiovanni, Matteo Fasiello, Eugene A. Lim, and Gi- anmassimo Tasinato. Multimessenger cosmology: Correlating cosmic microwave background and stochastic gravitational wave background measurements.Phys. Rev. D, 103(2):023532, 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    Monica Colpi et al. LISA Definition Study Report. 2 2024

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Impact of the noise knowledge uncertainty for the science exploitation of cosmological and astrophysical stochastic gravitational wave background with lisa

    Martina Muratore, Jonathan Gair, and Lorenzo Speri. Impact of the noise knowledge uncertainty for the science exploitation of cosmological and astrophysical stochastic gravitational wave background with lisa. Phys. Rev. D, 109:042001, Feb 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Effectiveness of null time-delay interferometry channels as instrument noise monitors in LISA.Phys

    Martina Muratore, Olaf Hartwig, Daniele Vetrugno, Stefano Vitale, and William Joseph Weber. Effectiveness of null time-delay interferometry channels as instrument noise monitors in LISA.Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):082004, 2023

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Cornish and Ronald W

    Neil J. Cornish and Ronald W. Hellings. The Effects of orbital motion on LISA time delay interferometry. Class. Quant. Grav., 20:4851–4860, 2003

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    Chiara Caprini et al. Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions.JCAP, 04:001, 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA

    Nicola Bartolo et al. Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravita- tional waves.JCAP, 12:026, 2016

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA.JCAP, 04:034, 2020

    Pierre Auclair et al. Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA.JCAP, 04:034, 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.Living Rev

    Pierre Auclair et al. Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.Living Rev. Rel., 26(1):5, 2023

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Gravitational waves from inflation in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics inter- pretation.JCAP, 11:032, 2024

    Matteo Braglia et al. Gravitational waves from inflation in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics inter- pretation.JCAP, 11:032, 2024

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Reconstructing primordial curvature perturbations via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA.JCAP, 05:062, 2025

    Jonas El Gammal et al. Reconstructing primordial curvature perturbations via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA.JCAP, 05:062, 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Observing kinematic anisotropies of the stochastic background with LISA.JCAP, 01:044, 2025

    Lavinia Heisenberg, Henri Inchausp´ e, and David Maibach. Observing kinematic anisotropies of the stochastic background with LISA.JCAP, 01:044, 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Smith, Smith, and Robert Caldwell

    Tristan L. Smith, Smith, and Robert Caldwell. LISA for Cosmologists: Calculating the Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Stochastic and Deterministic Sources.Phys. Rev. D, 100(10):104055, 2019. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 029902 (2022)]

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Contaldi, and Marco Peloso

    Giorgio Mentasti, Carlo R. Contaldi, and Marco Peloso. Probing the galactic and extragalactic gravitational wave backgrounds with space-based interferometers.JCAP, 06:055, 2024

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Mitigating cosmic variance in the Hellings-Downs curve: A cosmic microwave background analogy.Phys

    Cyril Pitrou and Giulia Cusin. Mitigating cosmic variance in the Hellings-Downs curve: A cosmic microwave background analogy.Phys. Rev. D, 111(8):083544, 2025

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Massimo Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong. Time delay interferometry for LISA.Phys. Rev. D, 65:082003, 2002

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    Prince, Massimo Tinto, Shane L

    Thomas A. Prince, Massimo Tinto, Shane L. Larson, and J. W. Armstrong. The LISA optimal sensitivity. 29 Phys. Rev. D, 66:122002, 2002

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    Geometric time delay interferometry.Phys

    Michele Vallisneri. Geometric time delay interferometry.Phys. Rev. D, 72:042003, 2005. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 76, 109903 (2007)]

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    Revisitation of time delay interferometry combi- nations that suppress laser noise in LISA.Class

    Martina Muratore, Daniele Vetrugno, and Stefano Vitale. Revisitation of time delay interferometry combi- nations that suppress laser noise in LISA.Class. Quant. Grav., 37(18):185019, 2020

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Characterization of time delay interferometry combinations for the LISA instrument noise.Phys

    Olaf Hartwig and Martina Muratore. Characterization of time delay interferometry combinations for the LISA instrument noise.Phys. Rev. D, 105(6):062006, 2022

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    Dhurandhar

    Massimo Tinto and Sanjeev V. Dhurandhar. Time-delay interferometry.Living Rev. Rel., 24(1):1, 2021

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Rubbo, Neil J

    Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade. Forward modeling of space borne gravitational wave detectors.Phys. Rev. D, 69:082003, 2004

    work page 2004

  64. [64]

    K. S. Thorne. Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation.Rev. Mod. Phys., 52:299–339, 1980

    work page 1980

  65. [65]

    Armano et al

    M. Armano et al. Sub-Femto- g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(23):231101, 2016

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Improved reconstruction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA.JCAP, 01:059, 2021

    Raphael Flauger, Nikolaos Karnesis, Germano Nardini, Mauro Pieroni, Angelo Ricciardone, and Jes´ us Tor- rado. Improved reconstruction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA.JCAP, 01:059, 2021

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations

    Stanislav Babak, Antoine Petiteau, and Martin Hewitson. LISA Sensitivity and SNR Calculations. 8 2021

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Cornish, and Chang Liu

    Travis Robson, Neil J. Cornish, and Chang Liu. The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves.Class. Quant. Grav., 36(10):105011, 2019

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    Neil J. Cornish. Detecting a stochastic gravitational wave background with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.Phys. Rev. D, 65:022004, 2002

    work page 2002

  70. [70]

    Figueroa, Raphael Flauger, Germano Nardini, Marco Peloso, Mauro Pieroni, An- gelo Ricciardone, and Gianmassimo Tasinato

    Chiara Caprini, Daniel G. Figueroa, Raphael Flauger, Germano Nardini, Marco Peloso, Mauro Pieroni, An- gelo Ricciardone, and Gianmassimo Tasinato. Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA.JCAP, 11:017, 2019

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Eric Thrane and Joseph D. Romano. Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds. Phys. Rev. D, 88(12):124032, 2013

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    J. R. Bond, Andrew H. Jaffe, and L. Knox. Estimating the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background.Phys. Rev. D, 57:2117–2137, 1998

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    Unified model for the LISA measurements and instrument simulations

    Jean-Baptiste Bayle and Olaf Hartwig. Unified model for the LISA measurements and instrument simulations. Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):083019, 2023

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Gravitational-wave background from extragalactic double white dwarfs for LISA.Astron

    Guillaume Boileau, Tristan Bruel, Alexandre Toubiana, Astrid Lamberts, and Nelson Christensen. Gravitational-wave background from extragalactic double white dwarfs for LISA.Astron. Astrophys., 702:A246, 2025

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Likelihood of white dwarf binaries to dominate the astrophysical gravi- tational wave background in the mHz band.Astron

    Seppe Staelens and Gijs Nelemans. Likelihood of white dwarf binaries to dominate the astrophysical gravi- tational wave background in the mHz band.Astron. Astrophys., 683:A139, 2024

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Uncertainty of the white dwarf astrophysical gravitational wave back- ground.Astron

    Sophie Hofman and Gijs Nelemans. Uncertainty of the white dwarf astrophysical gravitational wave back- ground.Astron. Astrophys., 691:A261, 2024

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Criswell, Steven Rieck, and Vuk Mandic

    Alexander W. Criswell, Steven Rieck, and Vuk Mandic. Templated anisotropic analyses of the LISA Galactic foreground.Phys. Rev. D, 111(2):023025, 2025

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Adams and Neil J

    Matthew R. Adams and Neil J. Cornish. Discriminating between a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background and Instrument Noise.Phys. Rev. D, 82:022002, 2010

    work page 2010

  79. [79]

    Uncovering gravitational-wave backgrounds from noises of unknown shape with LISA.JCAP, 04:066, 2023

    Quentin Baghi, Nikolaos Karnesis, Jean-Baptiste Bayle, Marc Besan¸ con, and Henri Inchausp´ e. Uncovering gravitational-wave backgrounds from noises of unknown shape with LISA.JCAP, 04:066, 2023

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    Leveraging time- dependent instrumental noise for the LISA stochastic gravitational wave background analysis.Phys

    James Alvey, Uddipta Bhardwaj, Valerie Domcke, Mauro Pieroni, and Christoph Weniger. Leveraging time- dependent instrumental noise for the LISA stochastic gravitational wave background analysis.Phys. Rev. D, 111(10):102006, 2025

    work page 2025