pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11131 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.LG· cs.MA

MADQRL: Distributed Quantum Reinforcement Learning Framework for Multi-Agent Environments

Abhishek Sawaika , Samuel Yen-Chi Chen , Udaya Parampalli , Rajkumar Buyya This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.LGcs.MA
keywords quantum reinforcement learningmulti-agent systemsdistributed learningcooperative pongpolicy representationquantum computing applications
0
0 comments X

The pith

A distributed quantum reinforcement learning framework lets agents learn independently to scale multi-agent tasks beyond current hardware limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework in which multiple quantum agents train their policies separately rather than jointly, spreading the computational demands of high-dimensional reinforcement learning across machines. This setup targets environments where agents operate with separate action and observation spaces, as occurs in many cooperative scenarios. The approach is tested on the cooperative-pong task and reports gains relative to both classical policy models and alternative distribution methods. A reader would care because it offers a concrete route to apply quantum reinforcement learning to complex multi-agent problems that exceed the reach of single-machine quantum systems.

Core claim

MADQRL is a distributed quantum reinforcement learning framework in which multiple agents learn independently, thereby distributing the load of joint training from individual machines. The method suits environments with disjoint action and observation spaces but can extend to other systems via reasonable approximations. On the cooperative-pong environment it yields roughly 10 percent improvement over other distribution strategies and roughly 5 percent improvement over classical models of policy representation.

What carries the argument

Independent distributed learning among quantum agents that splits joint training across machines for disjoint action and observation spaces.

Load-bearing premise

Multi-agent environments have sufficiently disjoint action and observation spaces to permit effective independent learning by each agent without major performance loss.

What would settle it

Training the framework on a multi-agent environment with heavily overlapping or interdependent action spaces and finding no gain or a clear loss versus joint-training baselines would falsify the central premise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11131 by Abhishek Sawaika, Rajkumar Buyya, Samuel Yen-Chi Chen, Udaya Parampalli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Architecture of MADQRL framework. Agents learn independently to optimize for joint objective defined by the environment. This independent training happens on local observation, reward and action spaces, such that the joint policy can be approximated by the product of local policies. Here, the MDP representation of the environment is just an example for completeness of the system. CTCE trains a joint policy… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A sample quantum circuit with 4 qubits, having angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A snapshot of the cooperative-pong game environment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparing learning curves for different dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) is one of the most practical ways to learn from real-life use-cases. Motivated from the cognitive methods used by humans makes it a widely acceptable strategy in the field of artificial intelligence. Most of the environments used for RL are often high-dimensional, and traditional RL algorithms becomes computationally expensive and challenging to effectively learn from such systems. Recent advancements in practical demonstration of quantum computing (QC) theories, such as compact encoding, enhanced representation and learning algorithms, random sampling, or the inherent stochastic nature of quantum systems, have opened up new directions to tackle these challenges. Quantum reinforcement learning (QRL) is seeking significant traction over the past few years. However, the current state of quantum hardware is not enough to cater for such high-dimensional environments with complex multi-agent setup. To tackle this issue, we propose a distributed framework for QRL where multiple agents learn independently, distributing the load of joint training from individual machines. Our method works well for environments with disjoint sets of action and observation spaces, but can also be extended to other systems with reasonable approximations. We analyze the proposed method on cooperative-pong environment and our results indicate ~10% improvement from other distribution strategies, and ~5% improvement from classical models of policy representation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MADQRL, a distributed quantum reinforcement learning framework for multi-agent environments. It claims suitability for settings with disjoint action and observation spaces (with extensions via reasonable approximations) and reports empirical results on the cooperative-pong environment showing ~10% improvement over other distribution strategies and ~5% improvement over classical policy representation models.

Significance. If the reported performance gains are shown to be robust, the framework could help scale QRL to multi-agent problems by distributing training load across independent agents. The approach addresses a practical hardware limitation of current quantum devices for high-dimensional multi-agent tasks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and experimental results: The headline claims of ~10% and ~5% improvements are presented without any description of baselines (which distributed QRL or classical methods were used?), number of independent runs, variance or error bars, statistical tests, or environment hyperparameters. This information is required to assess whether the deltas support the central claim that independent per-agent QRL preserves effective joint policies.
  2. [Methodology] Methodology section on disjoint spaces: The core premise that multi-agent environments admit sufficiently disjoint action/observation spaces (allowing independent learning without destroying cooperation) is stated but not formalized. No definition, metric, or quantification of 'disjointness' or 'reasonable approximations' is given, nor is there analysis of approximation error or resulting performance degradation when extending beyond cooperative-pong.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Framework Description] Clarify the precise quantum circuit or encoding used for the per-agent QRL components and how distribution is implemented (e.g., parameter sharing, communication protocol).
  2. [Introduction] Add a related-work subsection that explicitly compares MADQRL to prior distributed RL and quantum RL approaches rather than only citing general QRL literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important areas for improving clarity and rigor, particularly around experimental reporting and formalization of assumptions. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that directly incorporate the suggestions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and experimental results: The headline claims of ~10% and ~5% improvements are presented without any description of baselines (which distributed QRL or classical methods were used?), number of independent runs, variance or error bars, statistical tests, or environment hyperparameters. This information is required to assess whether the deltas support the central claim that independent per-agent QRL preserves effective joint policies.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and results section do not provide sufficient detail on these experimental elements. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly describe the baselines (other distribution strategies and classical policy models), state the number of independent runs performed, include variance and error bars, report statistical tests, and list key environment hyperparameters. These additions will be made both in an expanded abstract and in the results section to better support the performance claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methodology] Methodology section on disjoint spaces: The core premise that multi-agent environments admit sufficiently disjoint action/observation spaces (allowing independent learning without destroying cooperation) is stated but not formalized. No definition, metric, or quantification of 'disjointness' or 'reasonable approximations' is given, nor is there analysis of approximation error or resulting performance degradation when extending beyond cooperative-pong.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript states the applicability to disjoint spaces without a formal definition or quantitative analysis. We will revise the methodology section to include a formal definition of disjoint action and observation spaces, introduce a metric for quantifying disjointness (such as overlap in the joint space), and provide an analysis of approximation error along with discussion of performance degradation for extensions beyond the cooperative-pong environment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical framework proposal with reported experimental outcomes

full rationale

The paper proposes a distributed QRL framework for multi-agent settings and evaluates it empirically on cooperative-pong, stating performance deltas as measured results rather than quantities derived from internal equations or fitted parameters. No derivation chain, first-principles predictions, or self-referential definitions appear in the abstract or described content. The central claims rest on experimental comparison, not on any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. This is the expected non-finding for an applied systems paper whose value is in implementation and benchmarking.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described beyond the high-level framework proposal itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1030 out tokens · 50386 ms · 2026-05-10T16:31:33.363375+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Chal- lenges and Opportunities of Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems,

    A. D. Corcoles, A. Kandala, A. Javadi-Abhari, D. T. McClure, A. W. Cross, K. Temme, P. D. Nation, M. Steffen, and J. M. Gambetta, “Chal- lenges and Opportunities of Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 108, pp. 1338–1352, 8 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Hybrid Programming for Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems,

    A. McCaskey, E. Dumitrescu, D. Liakh, and T. Humble, “Hybrid Programming for Near-Term Quantum Computing Systems,”2018 IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing, ICRC 2018, 7 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Variational quantum algorithms,

    M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, “Variational quantum algorithms,”Nature Reviews Physics 2021 3:9, vol. 3, pp. 625–644, 8 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Supervised Learning with Quantum Computers,

    M. Schuld and F. Petruccione, “Supervised Learning with Quantum Computers,” 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Quantum long short-term memory,

    S. Y .-C. Chen, S. Yoo, and Y .-L. L. Fang, “Quantum long short-term memory,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8622–8626, IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    A Privacy-Preserving Federated Framework with Hybrid Quantum-Enhanced Learning for Financial Fraud Detec- tion,

    A. Sawaika, S. Krishna, T. Tomar, D. P. Suggisetti, A. Lal, T. Shrivastav, N. Innan, and M. Shafique, “A Privacy-Preserving Federated Framework with Hybrid Quantum-Enhanced Learning for Financial Fraud Detec- tion,” 7 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Pqlm-multilingual decentralized portable quantum language model,

    S. S. Li, X. Zhang, S. Zhou, H. Shu, R. Liang, H. Liu, and L. P. Garcia, “Pqlm-multilingual decentralized portable quantum language model,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    When bert meets quantum temporal convolution learning for text classification in heterogeneous computing,

    C.-H. H. Yang, J. Qi, S. Y .-C. Chen, Y . Tsao, and P.-Y . Chen, “When bert meets quantum temporal convolution learning for text classification in heterogeneous computing,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8602–8606, IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    The dawn of quantum natural language processing,

    R. Di Sipio, J.-H. Huang, S. Y .-C. Chen, S. Mangini, and M. Worring, “The dawn of quantum natural language processing,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8612–8616, IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Applying qnlp to sentiment analysis in finance,

    J. Stein, I. Christ, N. Kraus, M. B. Mansky, R. M ¨uller, and C. Linnhoff- Popien, “Applying qnlp to sentiment analysis in finance,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), vol. 2, pp. 20–25, IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Financial fraud detection using quantum graph neural networks,

    N. Innan, A. Sawaika, A. Dhor, S. Dutta, S. Thota, H. Gokal, N. Patel, M. A.-Z. Khan, I. Theodonis, and M. Bennai, “Financial fraud detection using quantum graph neural networks,”Quantum Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Quantum reinforcement learning: Concepts and appli- cations,

    S. Y .-C. Chen, “Quantum reinforcement learning: Concepts and appli- cations,”Quantum Computational AI, pp. 3–23, 1 2026

    work page 2026

  14. [14]

    Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning as an Emerging AI Technology: A Survey and Future Directions,

    W. Yu and J. Zhao, “Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning as an Emerging AI Technology: A Survey and Future Directions,” ICCA 2023 - 2023 5th International Conference on Computer and Applications, Proceedings, 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Chapter 8 Markov decision processes,

    M. L. Puterman, “Chapter 8 Markov decision processes,”Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 2, pp. 331–434, 1 1990

    work page 1990

  16. [16]

    Book Reviews Reinforcement Learning,

    R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, “Book Reviews Reinforcement Learning,” 1999

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning,

    L. Bus ¸oniu, R. Babuˇska, and B. De Schutter, “A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, vol. 38, pp. 156–172, 3 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments,

    S. Kraus, “Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 94, pp. 79–97, 7 1997

    work page 1997

  19. [19]

    Temporal difference learning and td-gammon,

    G. Tesauroet al., “Temporal difference learning and td-gammon,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 58–68, 1995

    work page 1995

  20. [20]

    Q-learning,

    C. J. C. H. Watkins and P. Dayan, “Q-learning,”Machine Learning 1992 8:3, vol. 8, pp. 279–292, 5 1992

    work page 1992

  21. [21]

    Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview,

    Y . Li, “Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview,” 1 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms,

    J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. K. Openai, “Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms,” 7 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Policy Gradient Methods for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation,

    R. S. Sutton, D. McAllester, S. Singh, and Y . Mansour, “Policy Gradient Methods for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 12, 1999

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey,

    S. Gronauer and K. Diepold, “Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey,”Artificial Intelligence Review 2021 55:2, vol. 55, pp. 895–943, 4 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Quantum-Train- Based Distributed Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,

    K. C. Chen, S. Y . C. Chen, C. Y . Liu, and K. K. Leung, “Quantum-Train- Based Distributed Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning,”2025 IEEE Symposium for Multidisciplinary Computational Intelligence Incubators, MCII Companion 2025, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Quantum reinforcement learning,

    D. Dong, C. Chen, H. Li, and T. J. Tarn, “Quantum reinforcement learning,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1207–1220, 2008

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Overview of projective quantum measurements,

    D. Barberena and A. J. Friedman, “Overview of projective quantum measurements,” 4 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search Citation in BibTeX format A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search,

    L. K. Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search Citation in BibTeX format A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search,” 1996

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    Variational Quantum Circuits for Deep Reinforcement Learning,

    S. Y . C. Chen, C. H. H. Yang, J. Qi, P. Y . Chen, X. Ma, and H. S. Goan, “Variational Quantum Circuits for Deep Reinforcement Learning,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 141007–141024, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Quantum Neural Networks,

    S. Gupta and R. K. Zia, “Quantum Neural Networks,”Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 63, pp. 355–383, 11 2001

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Cooperative Pong - PettingZoo Documentation, https://pettingzoo.farama.org/environments/butterfly/cooperative pong/

    “Cooperative Pong - PettingZoo Documentation, https://pettingzoo.farama.org/environments/butterfly/cooperative pong/.”

    work page

  32. [32]

    Pettingzoo: Gym for multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    J. Terry, B. Black, N. Grammel, M. Jayakumar, A. Hari, R. Sullivan, L. S. Santos, C. Dieffendahl, C. Horsch, R. Perez-Vicente,et al., “Pettingzoo: Gym for multi-agent reinforcement learning,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 15032–15043, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Ray: A distributed framework for emerging AI applications,

    P. Moritz, R. Nishihara, S. Wang, A. Tumanov, R. Liaw, E. Liang, M. Elibol, Z. Yang, W. Paul, M. I. Jordan, and I. Stoica, “Ray: A distributed framework for emerging AI applications,” in13th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 18), (Carlsbad, CA), pp. 561–577, USENIX Association, Oct. 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for Image Detection and Recognition,

    R. Chauhan, K. K. Ghanshala, and R. C. Joshi, “Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for Image Detection and Recognition,”ICSCCC 2018 - 1st International Conference on Secure Cyber Computing and Com- munications, pp. 278–282, 7 2018

    work page 2018