pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11149 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Band Tail State Broadening in IGZO TFTs After pBTI-Induced Negative VT Shift Revealed via DC and 1/f Noise Measurements

R. Asanovski , P. Rinaudo , A. Chasin , Y. Zhao , H.F.W. Dekkers , M. J. van Setten , D. Matsubayashi , N. Rassoul
show 4 more authors
A. Belmonte G.S. Kar B. Kaczer J. Franco
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords IGZOTFTband tail statespBTIthreshold voltage shift1/f noisesub-gap stateshydrogen doping
0
0 comments X

The pith

Positive bias and temperature stress broadens IGZO conduction band tail states rather than generating new dielectric traps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the mechanism behind negative threshold voltage shifts in back-gated amorphous IGZO thin-film transistors subjected to positive bias temperature instability stress. Combined DC electrical measurements and 1/f noise analysis show that the shifts result from broadening of the IGZO material's conduction band tail states, accompanied by higher hydrogen doping and more sub-gap states. Simulations using a Poisson solver reproduce the observed increases in sub-gap state density. A recovery step demonstrates that the threshold voltage, subthreshold swing, and noise changes reverse, indicating the process is not permanent trap creation in the dielectric layer.

Core claim

Combined DC and 1/f noise measurements reveal that the stress does not generate new dielectric traps but instead broadens the IGZO conduction band tail states. A recovery experiment confirms that the associated threshold voltage, subthreshold swing, and noise degradation are reversible. Simulations using an in-house Poisson solver confirm the experimental observations that high-temperature stress increases hydrogen doping and the density of sub-gap states.

What carries the argument

Broadening of IGZO conduction band tail states, identified by shifts in subthreshold swing and the frequency dependence of 1/f noise, as the dominant response to positive bias temperature stress instead of dielectric trap generation.

If this is right

  • TFT reliability models must account for reversible band-tail state increases driven by hydrogen rather than irreversible dielectric damage.
  • 1/f noise measurements become a practical diagnostic for distinguishing band-tail broadening from dielectric trap creation in oxide semiconductor devices.
  • Device operation at elevated temperatures will require hydrogen stabilization strategies to limit sub-gap state growth.
  • Recovery protocols after stress can restore much of the original electrical performance without permanent material alteration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other amorphous oxide semiconductors under similar bias-temperature conditions may exhibit comparable reversible band-tail broadening rather than fixed trap generation.
  • Material processing steps that reduce mobile hydrogen could extend the operational lifetime of IGZO circuits without changing the dielectric stack.
  • Temperature-dependent noise or capacitance measurements could map the exact energy distribution of the broadened tail states to guide composition tuning.

Load-bearing premise

Observed changes in subthreshold swing and 1/f noise spectra can be attributed primarily to band-tail broadening without substantial contributions from other trap distributions or contact effects.

What would settle it

If stressed devices exhibit subthreshold swing degradation while the 1/f noise spectrum remains unchanged in shape or magnitude from the unstressed case, or if recovery restores swing but not the noise level, the attribution to band-tail broadening would be contradicted.

read the original abstract

We investigate the origin of negative threshold voltage shifts in back-gated amorphous IGZO TFTs under positive bias and high temperature stress. Combined DC and 1/f noise measurements reveal that the stress does not generate new dielectric traps but instead broadens the IGZO conduction band tail states. A recovery experiment confirms that the associated threshold voltage, subthreshold swing, and noise degradation are reversible. Simulations using an in-house Poisson solver confirm the experimental observations that high-temperature stress increases hydrogen doping and the density of sub-gap states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the mechanism of negative threshold voltage (VT) shifts in back-gated amorphous IGZO TFTs under positive bias temperature instability (pBTI) stress. Through combined DC measurements (negative VT shift and subthreshold swing degradation), 1/f noise analysis, recovery experiments demonstrating reversibility, and simulations with an in-house Poisson solver, the authors conclude that the stress broadens the IGZO conduction band tail states due to increased hydrogen doping rather than generating new traps in the dielectric layer.

Significance. If the central attribution holds, this work would meaningfully advance understanding of reliability in IGZO TFTs, which are critical for displays and flexible electronics. Distinguishing band-tail broadening from dielectric trap generation has direct implications for device modeling, lifetime prediction, and mitigation strategies. The multi-technique approach (DC + noise) and demonstration of reversibility are strengths; the Poisson solver provides supporting modeling. The result could influence how pBTI is interpreted in oxide semiconductors more broadly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2] Section 3.2 (1/f Noise Measurements) and associated figures: The PSD data are interpreted as uniquely indicating conduction-band-tail broadening, but no quantitative model comparison is shown between a broadened tail-state DOS and alternative dielectric/interface trap distributions (e.g., McWhorter model with uniform or exponential traps). Standard 1/f models in a-Si/IGZO TFTs permit multiple DOS profiles to fit similar spectra; without explicit least-squares fits or likelihood ratios excluding dielectric contributions, the exclusion of new dielectric traps remains interpretive rather than demonstrated. This is load-bearing for the abstract claim.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (Simulations): The in-house Poisson solver reproduces increased sub-gap states only after the band-tail broadening model is inserted as input. This creates a risk of circularity, as the simulation confirms the assumed mechanism rather than independently testing it against a dielectric-trap model. The manuscript should report at least one alternative simulation (dielectric traps only) and show why it fails to match the combined DC + noise data.
  3. [Section 3.3] Section 3.3 (Recovery Experiment): Reversibility of VT, SS, and noise is presented as supporting band-tail broadening, but recovery is equally consistent with annealing of dielectric traps or hydrogen diffusion. Without additional distinguishing observables (e.g., temperature-dependent recovery kinetics or spatial profiling), this does not uniquely corroborate the central claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 and 4: Error bars or standard deviations are not shown on the noise spectra or SS vs. stress time plots, hindering assessment of statistical significance of the reported changes.
  2. [Methods] Methods section: The exact functional form and fitting parameters for the band-tail DOS (characteristic energy, prefactor) used in both experiment interpretation and the Poisson solver should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'measurements and simulations support the claim,' but the main text does not quantify the goodness-of-fit (e.g., R² or residual plots) for the noise data under the tail-broadening model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the insightful comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each of the major comments in detail below. Revisions have been made to include quantitative model comparisons, alternative simulations, and expanded discussions to better support our conclusions regarding band-tail state broadening in IGZO TFTs under pBTI stress.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 3.2] Section 3.2 (1/f Noise Measurements) and associated figures: The PSD data are interpreted as uniquely indicating conduction-band-tail broadening, but no quantitative model comparison is shown between a broadened tail-state DOS and alternative dielectric/interface trap distributions (e.g., McWhorter model with uniform or exponential traps). Standard 1/f models in a-Si/IGZO TFTs permit multiple DOS profiles to fit similar spectra; without explicit least-squares fits or likelihood ratios excluding dielectric contributions, the exclusion of new dielectric traps remains interpretive rather than demonstrated. This is load-bearing for the abstract claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative model comparison would strengthen the interpretation. In the revised manuscript, we have added least-squares fits of the measured PSD to both the broadened band-tail DOS model and a McWhorter model with dielectric/interface traps (uniform and exponential distributions). The band-tail model yields a lower residual error and better captures the frequency dependence and temperature evolution of the noise, while the dielectric-trap models systematically deviate at low frequencies and fail to reproduce the observed correlation with subthreshold swing. These fits and a brief discussion of the model discrimination are now included in Section 3.2 and a new supplementary figure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (Simulations): The in-house Poisson solver reproduces increased sub-gap states only after the band-tail broadening model is inserted as input. This creates a risk of circularity, as the simulation confirms the assumed mechanism rather than independently testing it against a dielectric-trap model. The manuscript should report at least one alternative simulation (dielectric traps only) and show why it fails to match the combined DC + noise data.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the risk of circularity. We have therefore added an alternative simulation in which only the dielectric trap density is increased (adjusted to produce the same negative VT shift) while keeping the band-tail DOS unchanged. This dielectric-only case reproduces the VT shift but fails to match the measured subthreshold swing degradation and, importantly, produces a 1/f noise spectrum whose amplitude and frequency dependence are inconsistent with experiment. The band-tail broadening model, by contrast, simultaneously fits the DC characteristics, noise spectra, and the hydrogen-doping trend. The comparative results are now presented in Section 4 with an additional figure. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Section 3.3] Section 3.3 (Recovery Experiment): Reversibility of VT, SS, and noise is presented as supporting band-tail broadening, but recovery is equally consistent with annealing of dielectric traps or hydrogen diffusion. Without additional distinguishing observables (e.g., temperature-dependent recovery kinetics or spatial profiling), this does not uniquely corroborate the central claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that reversibility by itself is not mechanism-specific. In the revised manuscript we have expanded Section 3.3 to discuss why the combination of observables favors band-tail broadening: the noise spectrum recovers in a manner consistent with a narrowing tail rather than a reduction in trap density, and the Poisson simulations link the changes to hydrogen redistribution. While temperature-dependent recovery kinetics or spatial profiling would provide further discrimination, such measurements lie outside the present study; the existing multi-technique data set (DC + noise + simulation) already constrains the interpretation more tightly than recovery alone. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental attribution rests on independent measurements and simulation validation.

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental study using DC characteristics, subthreshold swing, and 1/f noise spectra to attribute negative VT shift and degradation to broadening of IGZO conduction-band tail states rather than generation of new dielectric traps. Recovery behavior is shown to be reversible. An in-house Poisson solver is invoked to confirm that inserting a broadened tail-state density reproduces the observed sub-gap state increase and hydrogen doping effects. No derivation chain, equation, or 'prediction' reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation; the central claim is an interpretive attribution from direct data, not a mathematical equivalence. The simulation serves as consistency check after the model is chosen, not as a load-bearing uniqueness proof. This is a standard measurement-driven analysis with external falsifiability via the reported recovery and noise spectra.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard semiconductor device physics and noise interpretation models; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Established models relating 1/f noise and subthreshold swing to band-tail state density in amorphous semiconductors
    Paper interprets noise and swing changes as direct signatures of tail-state broadening.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5446 in / 1226 out tokens · 44386 ms · 2026-05-10T14:54:04.920619+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kumar,et al., Sub-200Ω·𝜇m alloyed contacts to synthetic monolayer MoS2, in2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)(IEEE) (2021), pp

    A. Belmonte, H. Oh, S. Subhechha, N. Rassoul, H. Hody, H. Dekkers, R. Delhougne, L. Ricotti, K. Banerjee, A. Chasin, M. J. van Setten, H. Puliyalil, M. Pak, L. Teugels, D. Tsvetanova, K. Vandersmissen, S. Kundu, J. Heijlen, D. Batuk, J. Geypen, L. Goux, and G. S. Kar, “Tai- loring IGZO-TFT architecture for capacitorless DRAM, demonstrating >10 3s retentio...

    work page doi:10.1109/iedm19574.2021.9720596 2021

  2. [2]

    Two-step degradation of a-InGaZnO thin film transistors under DC bias stress,

    C.-F. Hu, T. Teng, and X.-P. Qu, “Two-step degradation of a-InGaZnO thin film transistors under DC bias stress,”Solid-State Electronics, vol. 152, pp. 4–10, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.sse.2018.11.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sse.2018.11.005 2019

  3. [3]

    First demonstration of sub-12 nm Lg gate last IGZO-TFTs with oxygen tunnel architecture for front gate devices,

    S. Subhechha, N. Rassoul, A. Belmonte, R. Delhougne, K. Banerjee, G. L. Donadio, H. Dekkers, M. J. van Setten, H. Puliyalil, M. Mao, S. Kundu, M. Pak, L. Teugels, D. Tsvetanova, N. Bazzazian, L. Klijs, H. Hody, A. Chasin, J. Heijlen, L. Goux, and G. S. Kar, “First demonstration of sub-12 nm Lg gate last IGZO-TFTs with oxygen tunnel architecture for front ...

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Kumar,et al., Sub-200Ω·𝜇m alloyed contacts to synthetic monolayer MoS2, in2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)(IEEE) (2021), pp

    A. Chasin, J. Franco, K. Triantopoulos, H. Dekkers, N. Rassoul, A. Bel- monte, Q. Smets, S. Subhechha, D. Claes, M. J. van Setten, J. Mitard, R. Delhougne, V . Afanas’ev, B. Kaczer, and G. S. Kar, “Understanding and modelling the PBTI reliability of thin-film IGZO transistors,” in 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2021, pp. 31.1.1–3...

    work page doi:10.1109/iedm19574.2021.9720666 2021

  5. [5]

    Compact Modeling of Emerging IC Devices for Technology -Design Co -development,

    Z. Wu, A. Chasin, J. Franco, S. Subhechha, H. Dekkers, Y . Bhuvanesh- wari, A. Belmonte, N. Rassoul, M. van Setten, V . Afanas’Ev, R. Del- hougne, B. Kaczer, and G. Kar, “Characterizing and Modelling of the BTI Reliability in IGZO-TFT using Light-assisted I-V Spectroscopy,” in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2022, pp. 30.1.1– 30.1.4, d...

    work page doi:10.1109/iedm45625.2022.10019454 2022

  6. [6]

    Silicon RibbonFET CMOS at 6nm Gate Length,

    A. Chasin, J. Franco, S. Van Beek, H. Dekkers, A. Kruv, P. Rinaudo, Y . Zhao, D. Matsubayashi, A. Pavel, Y . Wan, K. Trivedi, N. Ras- soul, J. Li, Y . Jiang, M. Van Setten, S. Subhechha, A. Belmonte, B. Kaczer, and G. S. Kar, “Unraveling BTI in IGZO Devices: Im- pact of Device Architecture, Channel Film Deposition Method and Stoichiometry/Phase, and Devic...

    work page doi:10.1109/iedm50854.2024.10873388 2024

  7. [7]

    Silicon RibbonFET CMOS at 6nm Gate Length,

    G. Liu, Z. Zhang, D. H. Trinh, H. Li, Q. Kong, C. Sun, Z. Zhou, D. Zhang, X. Wang, K. Han, Y . Kang, B.-Y . Nguyen, K. Ni, G. Liang, and X. Gong, “Revealing the Impact of Hydrogen (H) on NBTI/PBTI of IGZTO FETs Under DC and AC Stress: Deep Dive into H Dynamics and Advanced Modeling,” in2024 IEEE In- ternational Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2024, pp. 1...

    work page doi:10.1109/iedm50854.2024.10873553 2024

  8. [8]

    Light-Assisted Investigation of the Role of Oxygen Flow during IGZO Deposition on Deep Subgap States and their Evolution Under PBTI,

    P. Rinaudo, A. Chasin, Y . Zhao, B. Kaczer, N. Rassoul, H. F. Dekkers, M. J. van Setten, A. Belmonte, I. De Wolf, G. Kar, and J. Franco, “Light-Assisted Investigation of the Role of Oxygen Flow during IGZO Deposition on Deep Subgap States and their Evolution Under PBTI,” in 2024 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2024, pp. 1–6, doi: ...

    work page doi:10.1109/irps48228.2024.10529432 2024

  9. [9]

    Comprehensive Study of Low-Frequency Noise Origins in Scaled Atomic-Layer-Deposited IGZO TFTs,

    S. Lee, C. Niu, C.-A. Shih, J.-Y . Lin, Z. Zhang, Y . Zhang, L. Long, H. Wang, M. A. Alam, and P. D. Ye, “Comprehensive Study of Low-Frequency Noise Origins in Scaled Atomic-Layer-Deposited IGZO TFTs,”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2993– 2999, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TED.2025.3562509

    work page doi:10.1109/ted.2025.3562509 2025

  10. [10]

    Low-Frequency Noise in Amorphous Indium–Gallium–Zinc- Oxide Thin-Film Transistors,

    J.-M. Lee, W.-S. Cheong, C.-S. Hwang, I.-T. Cho, H.-I. Kwon, and J.- H. Lee, “Low-Frequency Noise in Amorphous Indium–Gallium–Zinc- Oxide Thin-Film Transistors,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 505–507, 2009, doi: 10.1109/LED.2009.2015783

    work page doi:10.1109/led.2009.2015783 2009

  11. [11]

    Low-frequency noise and DC I–V characterization of gamma-ray irradiation-induced degradation and trap behaviors in a-IGZO TFTs,

    H. Lee, J. Yoo, H. Song, B. Lee, S. J. Yoon, S. Lim, J. H. Jeong, S. Kim, M. Park, S. Park, S. Jung, B. Pandit, T. Moon, J.-H. Hwang, K. Lee, Y . K. Lee, K. Heo, and H. Bae, “Low-frequency noise and DC I–V characterization of gamma-ray irradiation-induced degradation and trap behaviors in a-IGZO TFTs,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 126, no. 6, p. 063504, 0...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0238211 2025

  12. [12]

    The Influ- ence of Hydrogen on Defects of In–Ga–Zn–O Semiconductor Thin- Film Transistors With Atomic-Layer Deposition of Al2O3,

    T. Kim, Y . Nam, J. Hur, S.-H. K. Park, and S. Jeon, “The Influ- ence of Hydrogen on Defects of In–Ga–Zn–O Semiconductor Thin- Film Transistors With Atomic-Layer Deposition of Al2O3,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1131–1134, 2016, doi: 10.1109/LED.2016.2594258

    work page doi:10.1109/led.2016.2594258 2016

  13. [13]

    Improved Analysis of Low Frequency Noise in Field-Effect MOS Transistors,

    G. Ghibaudo, O. Roux, C. Nguyen-Duc, F. Balestra, and J. Brini, “Improved Analysis of Low Frequency Noise in Field-Effect MOS Transistors,”physica status solidi (a), vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 571–581, 1991, doi: 10.1002/pssa.2211240225

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2211240225 1991

  14. [14]

    Low frequency noise in MOS transistors—I Theory,

    S. Christensson, I. Lundstr ¨om, and C. Svensson, “Low frequency noise in MOS transistors—I Theory,”Solid-State Electronics, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 797–812, 1968, doi: 10.1016/0038-1101(68)90100-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0038-1101(68)90100-7 1968

  15. [15]

    On the theory of carrier number fluctuations in MOS devices,

    G. Ghibaudo, “On the theory of carrier number fluctuations in MOS devices,”Solid-State Electronics, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 563–565, 1989, doi: 10.1016/0038-1101(89)90113-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0038-1101(89)90113-5 1989

  16. [16]

    1/ƒ noise is no surface effect,

    F. Hooge, “1/ƒ noise is no surface effect,”Physics Letters A, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 139–140, 1969, doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(69)90076-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(69)90076-0 1969

  17. [17]

    1/f noise in MOS devices, mo- bility or number fluctuations?

    L. Vandamme, X. Li, and D. Rigaud, “1/f noise in MOS devices, mo- bility or number fluctuations?”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1936–1945, 1994, doi: 10.1109/16.333809

    work page doi:10.1109/16.333809 1936

  18. [18]

    What Do We Certainly Know About 1/fNoise in MOSTs?

    L. K. J. Vandamme and F. N. Hooge, “What Do We Certainly Know About 1/fNoise in MOSTs?”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3070–3085, 2008, doi: 10.1109/TED.2008.2005167

    work page doi:10.1109/ted.2008.2005167 2008

  19. [19]

    1/fNoise and Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices,

    D. M. Fleetwood, “1/fNoise and Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices,”IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1462–1486, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2015.2405852

    work page doi:10.1109/tns.2015.2405852 2015

  20. [20]

    Coulomb effect on doping in amorphous semiconductors,

    V . I. Arkhipov, E. V . Emelianova, and G. J. Adriaenssens, “Coulomb effect on doping in amorphous semiconductors,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 63, p. 081202, Feb 2001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.081202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.081202 2001

  21. [21]

    Modeling and characterization of the low frequency noise behavior for amorphous InGaZnO thin film transistors in the subthreshold region,

    M. Cai and R. Yao, “Modeling and characterization of the low frequency noise behavior for amorphous InGaZnO thin film transistors in the subthreshold region,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 122, no. 15, p. 154503, 10 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4994152

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4994152 2017

  22. [22]

    Finite Element Framework for electrostatics and optical simulations in IGZO TFTs - Part 1: Modeling,

    P. Rinaudo, A. Chasin, B. Kaczer, Y . Zhao, H. Dekkers, S. Subhechha, A. Belmonte, I. De Wolf, and J. Franco, “Finite Element Framework for electrostatics and optical simulations in IGZO TFTs - Part 1: Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2025, under review

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Real- and reciprocal-space attributes of band tail states,

    J. F. Wager, “Real- and reciprocal-space attributes of band tail states,”AIP Advances, vol. 7, no. 12, p. 125321, 12 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.5008521

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5008521 2017

  24. [24]

    Conduction in non-crystalline systems V . Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amor- phous semiconductors,

    E. A. Davis and N. F. Mott, “Conduction in non-crystalline systems V . Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amor- phous semiconductors,”Philosophical Magazine, vol. 22, no. 179, p. 0903–0922, Nov. 1970, doi: 10.1080/14786437008221061

    work page doi:10.1080/14786437008221061 1970

  25. [25]

    Carrier transport and electronic structure in amorphous oxide semiconductor, a-InGaZnO4,

    A. Takagi, K. Nomura, H. Ohta, H. Yanagi, T. Kamiya, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, “Carrier transport and electronic structure in amorphous oxide semiconductor, a-InGaZnO4,”Thin Solid Films, vol. 486, no. 1–2, p. 38–41, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.223

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.223 2005

  26. [26]

    Origin of definite Hall voltage and positive slope in mobility-donor density relation in disordered oxide semiconductors,

    T. Kamiya, K. Nomura, and H. Hosono, “Origin of definite Hall voltage and positive slope in mobility-donor density relation in disordered oxide semiconductors,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 12, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1063/1.3364131

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3364131 2010