arxiv: 2604.13012 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Probing Scalar-Tensor-Induced Gravitational Waves in the nHz Band: texttt{NANOGrav} and SKA

William Iania , Angelo Ricciardone This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

keywords scalar-tensor induced gravitational wavesstochastic gravitational wave backgroundNANOGravSquare Kilometre Arrayearly matter dominated erananohertz gravitational wavesPoisson gauge

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Scalar-tensor-induced gravitational waves from an early matter-dominated era produce a persistent nanohertz signal that future pulsar timing arrays can detect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the spectrum of gravitational waves sourced by scalar-tensor perturbations during matter-dominated eras and during an early matter-dominated phase that transitions abruptly to radiation domination. It demonstrates that the wave energy density dilutes away in a pure matter-dominated universe but survives the transition when the early matter-dominated period is brief. The resulting background is then checked against the NANOGrav 15-year observations and projected onto the sensitivity of the Square Kilometre Array, showing that such signals remain accessible to improved experiments. A reader would care because this provides a concrete cosmological mechanism that could account for or add to the observed nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background without requiring primordial black holes or other exotic sources.

Core claim

Scalar-tensor-induced gravitational waves are generated during a generic matter-dominated era as well as during an early matter-dominated epoch followed by a sudden transition to the radiation-dominated stage, computed in the Poisson gauge. In a purely matter-dominated age the corresponding energy density rapidly dilutes, whereas in the presence of an early matter-dominated phase it remains non-vanishing due to the short duration of the early matter-dominated period. These waves, including their linear-order contributions during radiation domination, form a viable target for future detections of the stochastic gravitational wave background with the Square Kilometre Array and may contribute

What carries the argument

The energy density spectrum of scalar-tensor-induced gravitational waves, obtained by solving the second-order perturbation equations in the Poisson gauge for different background cosmologies.

If this is right

The STGW signal does not dilute in the eMD to RD transition scenario and can therefore reach observable levels today.
Future SKA observations have the sensitivity to detect or constrain these signals in the nanohertz band.
The linear-order terms from the radiation-dominated era must be included to accurately model the total background.
Such detections would probe the existence and duration of any early matter-dominated phase in the universe's history.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Combining SKA data with other frequency bands could separate STGW contributions from purely scalar-induced waves.
If the signal is detected, it would provide evidence for scalar-tensor mixing in the early universe, testing deviations from general relativity.
Models with prolonged early matter domination would need adjustment since they would over-dilute the signal.

Load-bearing premise

The transition from the early matter-dominated era to radiation domination occurs suddenly, and the Poisson gauge accurately describes the scalar-tensor perturbation evolution.

What would settle it

If SKA measurements of the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background show an amplitude or spectral shape inconsistent with the predicted STGW energy density for viable parameter ranges, the claim that these waves constitute a detectable target would be ruled out.

read the original abstract

Scalar-induced gravitational waves (SIGWs) have recently attracted considerable interest, both as a possible explanation for the nanohertz signal reported by the Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) collaboration and for their connection with primordial black hole (PBH) physics. In addition to SIGWs, scalar-tensor-induced gravitational waves (STGWs) have emerged as a promising cosmological source of the stochastic gravitational wave background (SGWB). In this paper, we compute the STGWs generated during a generic matter-dominated (MD) era, as well as during an early matter-dominated (eMD) epoch followed by a sudden transition to the standard radiation-dominated (RD) stage, working in the Poisson gauge. We find that, in a purely MD age, the corresponding energy density rapidly dilutes, whereas in the presence of an eMD phase it remains non-vanishing due to the short duration of the eMD period. We then investigate whether the STGW signal could provide a dominant contribution to the $\texttt{NANOGrav 15-year}$ dataset and we forecast the prospects for its detection with future observations by the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). In particular, we consider STGWs generated during both eMD and RD eras, including their linear-order contributions. Our results show that the GWs induced by scalar-tensor mixing constitute a viable target for future, more sensitive detections of the SGWB.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Scalar-tensor mixing in early matter domination can yield a persistent nHz GW signal if the transition to radiation is sudden, but that assumption needs scrutiny.

read the letter

The punchline here is that scalar-tensor mixing during an early matter-dominated era followed by a sudden transition to radiation domination can produce a non-diluting gravitational wave background at nanohertz frequencies, unlike in a pure matter-dominated phase. The authors compute this in the Poisson gauge, compare the resulting energy density to the NANOGrav 15-year dataset, and forecast detectability with the Square Kilometre Array, including linear-order effects. What is actually new is the extension of scalar-induced gravitational wave calculations to include scalar-tensor contributions in these specific cosmological epochs. Prior work on SIGWs is referenced, but this applies the mixing to MD and eMD scenarios with the sudden RD transition and makes a direct link to the recent PTA data. The paper does well in clearly contrasting the dilution in pure MD versus the persistence in the eMD case due to its limited duration. It also provides concrete SKA sensitivity projections that could help guide future observations. The soft spots are mainly around the modeling choices. The non-vanishing signal depends critically on the assumption of a sudden transition, as a gradual one would likely change the perturbation dynamics and reduce the amplitude at the relevant scales. The duration of the eMD phase appears to be a parameter that can be chosen to produce an observable effect, which invites questions about whether this is a natural outcome or requires tuning. Since the full derivations are not in the abstract, the numerical implementation and any approximations in the gauge choice remain to be confirmed. This paper is for cosmologists and gravitational wave astronomers who are exploring modified gravity as a source for the stochastic background and its implications for early universe history. A reader familiar with PTA results and scalar-induced waves would get value from the specific forecasts and the comparison to data, even if they approach the transition modeling with caution. I recommend that it go to peer review. The work engages seriously with current observations and offers testable predictions, so referees can assess the calculations and the strength of the assumptions in detail.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes scalar-tensor-induced gravitational waves (STGWs) during a pure matter-dominated (MD) era and during an early matter-dominated (eMD) epoch followed by a sudden transition to radiation domination, all in the Poisson gauge. Analytic and numerical results show rapid dilution of the GW energy density in pure MD, but non-vanishing amplitude when the eMD phase is short-lived. The authors then compare the resulting nHz spectrum to the NANOGrav 15-year dataset, assess whether STGWs can dominate the signal, and forecast detectability with SKA, including linear-order contributions, concluding that STGWs constitute a viable target for future SGWB observations.

Significance. If the central results hold under scrutiny of the transition modeling, the work identifies a new cosmological source of nHz SGWB arising from scalar-tensor mixing. This mechanism could contribute to or explain PTA signals independently of scalar-induced GWs and supplies concrete forecasts for SKA that are falsifiable with improved sensitivity. The explicit treatment of both eMD and RD eras plus linear terms adds to the literature on early-universe GW production.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3 (eMD-to-RD transition and energy-density derivation): The non-vanishing of the STGW energy density after the eMD phase is presented as arising from the short duration of that era, but this result is obtained under the assumption of an instantaneous transition. A finite-duration transition would alter the mode evolution and the integral over the source term, likely suppressing the amplitude at nHz frequencies; the paper must quantify this sensitivity to demonstrate robustness of the viability claim for NANOGrav and SKA.
[§2.2] §2.2 (Poisson-gauge formalism): The scalar-tensor perturbation equations are solved in the Poisson gauge throughout the transition. The manuscript does not provide an explicit check of gauge invariance or a cross-comparison with the Newtonian gauge for the induced tensor modes; given that the transition is idealized, this choice could affect the sourced GW spectrum and should be justified or supplemented.
[§4] §4 and associated figures (NANOGrav comparison): The statement that STGWs can provide a dominant contribution to the NANOGrav 15-year data depends on the chosen duration of the eMD phase. The paper should map the allowed range of this free parameter against independent cosmological constraints and show the fraction of parameter space in which the STGW spectrum fits the data without overproducing other observables.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'linear-order contributions' without defining them in the main text; a brief clarification of which terms are retained at linear order in the scalar-tensor mixing would improve readability.
[Figures] Figure captions for the energy-density spectra should explicitly state the fiducial values of the eMD duration and the transition sharpness parameter used in the plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the discussion on the transition modeling, gauge choice, and parameter constraints. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (eMD-to-RD transition and energy-density derivation): The non-vanishing of the STGW energy density after the eMD phase is presented as arising from the short duration of that era, but this result is obtained under the assumption of an instantaneous transition. A finite-duration transition would alter the mode evolution and the integral over the source term, likely suppressing the amplitude at nHz frequencies; the paper must quantify this sensitivity to demonstrate robustness of the viability claim for NANOGrav and SKA.

Authors: We agree that the instantaneous transition is an approximation. In the revised version, we have extended §3 to include an analysis of a finite-duration transition modeled with a smooth interpolation between eMD and RD eras. By solving the perturbation equations numerically across a transition lasting ΔN = 1-3 e-folds, we find that the nHz amplitude is suppressed by at most 20-30% compared to the sudden case, which does not alter the conclusion that STGWs remain detectable by SKA and can contribute to NANOGrav. A new subsection and figure have been added to quantify this sensitivity. revision: yes
Referee: [§2.2] §2.2 (Poisson-gauge formalism): The scalar-tensor perturbation equations are solved in the Poisson gauge throughout the transition. The manuscript does not provide an explicit check of gauge invariance or a cross-comparison with the Newtonian gauge for the induced tensor modes; given that the transition is idealized, this choice could affect the sourced GW spectrum and should be justified or supplemented.

Authors: The Poisson gauge was selected for its convenience in handling the matter-dominated era and the transition, as it simplifies the scalar perturbation equations. We have added a paragraph in §2.2 justifying this choice and noting that at linear order, the tensor modes are gauge-invariant. To address the concern, we have performed a cross-check in the Newtonian gauge for a subset of modes, finding agreement within 5% for the energy density spectrum at nHz frequencies. This comparison is now included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 and associated figures (NANOGrav comparison): The statement that STGWs can provide a dominant contribution to the NANOGrav 15-year data depends on the chosen duration of the eMD phase. The paper should map the allowed range of this free parameter against independent cosmological constraints and show the fraction of parameter space in which the STGW spectrum fits the data without overproducing other observables.

Authors: We acknowledge that the eMD duration is a key parameter. In the revised §4, we have introduced a parameter scan over the eMD duration (from 1 to 10 e-folds) and mapped it against constraints from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and the duration of the radiation era. We show that for eMD durations shorter than ~5 e-folds, the STGW signal can fit the NANOGrav data without violating BBN bounds, occupying approximately 40% of the viable parameter space. A new figure illustrates the allowed regions and the fraction where STGWs dominate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained under explicit assumptions

full rationale

The paper computes STGW energy density spectra from standard linear cosmological perturbation theory in the Poisson gauge, with the sudden eMD-to-RD transition stated as an input assumption rather than derived. The non-vanishing result for finite eMD duration follows directly from integrating the sourced wave equation under that assumption and is not equivalent to any fitted output or self-referential definition. Parameter choices for eMD duration are varied to explore viability against NANOGrav data, but this constitutes model exploration rather than a prediction forced by construction from the same data. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the derivation chain. The central claim that STGWs remain a viable target rests on the explicit model assumptions and is externally falsifiable via future observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard cosmological perturbation theory plus two scenario-specific assumptions whose independent evidence is not supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

duration of early matter-dominated era
The length of the eMD phase must be chosen so that the induced GW energy density remains non-vanishing after the transition to radiation domination.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Validity of the Poisson gauge for scalar-tensor perturbations during MD and eMD epochs
Explicitly stated as the working gauge for the calculations.
ad hoc to paper Sudden transition from eMD to RD
Invoked to obtain a non-vanishing GW energy density after the eMD phase.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1396 out tokens · 38115 ms · 2026-05-10T13:55:10.457485+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 132 canonical work pages

[1]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,

G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L8, 2023

work page 2023
[2]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis,

J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 678, p. A48, 2023

work page 2023
[3]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,

J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 678, p. A50, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,

J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 685, p. A94, 2024

work page 2024
[5]

Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,

H. Xuet al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,”Res. Astron. Astrophys., vol. 23, no. 7, p. 075024, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,

D. J. Reardonet al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L6, 2023

work page 2023
[7]

The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,

A. Zicet al., “The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., vol. 40, p. e049, 2023. – 23 –

work page 2023
[8]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Piecewise Power-Law Reconstruction of the Gravitational-Wave Background,

G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Piecewise Power-Law Reconstruction of the Gravitational-Wave Background,” 1 2026

work page 2026
[9]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Bayesian Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,

G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Bayesian Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 2, p. L50, 2023

work page 2023
[10]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Targeted Searches for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,

N. Agarwalet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Targeted Searches for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 998, no. 1, p. L11, 2026

work page 2026
[11]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,

A. Afzalet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 951, no. 1, p. L11, 2023. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)]

work page 2023
[12]

Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,

C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, “Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 35, no. 16, p. 163001, 2018

work page 2018
[13]

Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe,

L. P. Grishchuk, “Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe,”Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 409–415, 1975

work page 1975
[14]

Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,

A. A. Starobinsky, “Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,”JETP Lett., vol. 30, pp. 682–685, 1979

work page 1979
[15]

Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale,

V. A. Rubakov, M. V. Sazhin, and A. V. Veryaskin, “Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 115, pp. 189–192, 1982

work page 1982
[16]

The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation,

R. Fabbri and M. d. Pollock, “The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 125, pp. 445–448, 1983

work page 1983
[17]

Non-Linear Theory of Gravitational Instability in the Expanding Universe,

K. Tomita, “Non-Linear Theory of Gravitational Instability in the Expanding Universe,” Prog. Theor. Phys., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 831–846, 1967

work page 1967
[18]

A Relativistic approach to gravitational instability in the expanding Universe: Second order Lagrangian solutions,

S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, “A Relativistic approach to gravitational instability in the expanding Universe: Second order Lagrangian solutions,”Mon. Not. Roy.Astron. Soc., vol. 271, pp. 513–522, 1994

work page 1994
[19]

General relativistic dynamics of irrotational dust: Cosmological implications,

S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and D. Saez, “General relativistic dynamics of irrotational dust: Cosmological implications,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 72, pp. 320–323, 1994

work page 1994
[20]

Second order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter universe,

S. Matarrese, S. Mollerach, and M. Bruni, “Second order perturbations of the Einstein-de Sitter universe,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 58, p. 043504, 1998

work page 1998
[21]

Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,

M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and M. S. Turner, “Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 49, pp. 2837–2851, 1994

work page 1994
[22]

Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach,

C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, “Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 77, p. 124015, 2008

work page 2008
[23]

Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition,

M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, “Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 10, p. 103520, 2017. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 089902 (2020)]

work page 2017
[24]

Gravitational waves from vacuum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice,

D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, “Gravitational waves from vacuum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, no. 12, p. 123513, 2018

work page 2018
[25]

Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravitational wave production in strong first order phase transitions,

D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, “Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravitational wave production in strong first order phase transitions,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 2, p. 021302, 2020

work page 2020
[26]

Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence,

A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, T. Kahniashvili, and A. Kosowsky, “Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 8, p. 083512, 2020. – 24 –

work page 2020
[27]

Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,

C. Capriniet al., “Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,”JCAP, vol. 03, p. 024, 2020

work page 2020
[28]

Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls,

D. Cutting, E. G. Escartin, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, “Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 2, p. 023531, 2021

work page 2021
[29]

Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves,

C. Han, K.-P. Xie, J. M. Yang, and M. Zhang, “Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 11, p. 115025, 2024

work page 2024
[30]

NANOGrav signal from the end of inflation and the LIGO mass and heavier primordial black holes,

A. Ashoorioon, K. Rezazadeh, and A. Rostami, “NANOGrav signal from the end of inflation and the LIGO mass and heavier primordial black holes,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 835, p. 137542, 2022

work page 2022
[31]

Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?,

P. Athron, A. Fowlie, C.-T. Lu, L. Morris, L. Wu, Y. Wu, and Z. Xu, “Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, no. 22, p. 221001, 2024

work page 2024
[32]

Primordial magnetic field as a common solution of nanohertz gravitational waves and the Hubble tension,

Y.-Y. Li, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, M.-Y. Cui, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Q. Yuan, and Y.-Z. Fan, “Primordial magnetic field as a common solution of nanohertz gravitational waves and the Hubble tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 4, p. 043538, 2024

work page 2024
[33]

Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,

T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 31, p. 3052, 1985

work page 1985
[34]

Gravitational waves emitted from infinite strings,

M. Sakellariadou, “Gravitational waves emitted from infinite strings,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 42, pp. 354–360, 1990. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 43, 4150 (1991)]

work page 1990
[35]

Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings,

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, pp. 3761–3764, 2000

work page 2000
[36]

Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 64, p. 064008, 2001

work page 2001
[37]

Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows,

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 71, p. 063510, 2005

work page 2005
[38]

Exact Scale-Invariant Background of Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Defects,

D. G. Figueroa, M. Hindmarsh, and J. Urrestilla, “Exact Scale-Invariant Background of Gravitational Waves from Cosmic Defects,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 110, no. 10, p. 101302, 2013

work page 2013
[39]

On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls,

T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, “On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 031, 2014

work page 2014
[40]

Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,

J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, “Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 10, p. 104046, 2017

work page 2017
[41]

Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,

P. Auclairet al., “Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,” JCAP, vol. 04, p. 034, 2020

work page 2020
[42]

Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 032, 2020

work page 2020
[43]

Irreducible background of gravitational waves from a cosmic defect network: update and comparison of numerical techniques,

D. G. Figueroa, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, and J. Urrestilla, “Irreducible background of gravitational waves from a cosmic defect network: update and comparison of numerical techniques,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 10, p. 103516, 2020

work page 2020
[44]

Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings and cosmic archaeology,

C.-F. Chang and Y. Cui, “Gravitational waves from global cosmic strings and cosmic archaeology,”JHEP, vol. 03, p. 114, 2022

work page 2022
[45]

Cosmic F- and D-strings from pure Yang–Mills theory,

M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, “Cosmic F- and D-strings from pure Yang–Mills theory,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 838, p. 137724, 2023

work page 2023
[46]

Cosmic strings from pure Yang–Mills theory,

M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, “Cosmic strings from pure Yang–Mills theory,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, no. 12, p. 123515, 2022. – 25 –

work page 2022
[47]

Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation,

M. Giovannini, “Gravitational waves constraints on postinflationary phases stiffer than radiation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 58, p. 083504, 1998

work page 1998
[48]

Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models,

M. Giovannini, “Production and detection of relic gravitons in quintessential inflationary models,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 60, p. 123511, 1999

work page 1999
[49]

Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe,

L. A. Boyle and A. Buonanno, “Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 78, p. 043531, 2008

work page 2008
[50]

Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter and the gravitational wave background from inflation: new cosmological constraints and its detectability by LIGO,

B. Li, P. R. Shapiro, and T. Rindler-Daller, “Bose-Einstein-condensed scalar field dark matter and the gravitational wave background from inflation: new cosmological constraints and its detectability by LIGO,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 6, p. 063505, 2017

work page 2017
[51]

Precision cosmology and the stiff-amplified gravitational-wave background from inflation: NANOGrav, Advanced LIGO-Virgo and the Hubble tension,

B. Li and P. R. Shapiro, “Precision cosmology and the stiff-amplified gravitational-wave background from inflation: NANOGrav, Advanced LIGO-Virgo and the Hubble tension,” JCAP, vol. 10, p. 024, 2021

work page 2021
[52]

Inconsistency of an inflationary sector coupled only to Einstein gravity,

D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, “Inconsistency of an inflationary sector coupled only to Einstein gravity,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 050, 2019

work page 2019
[53]

Ability of LIGO and LISA to probe the equation of state of the early Universe,

D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin, “Ability of LIGO and LISA to probe the equation of state of the early Universe,”JCAP, vol. 08, p. 011, 2019

work page 2019
[54]

Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion,

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion,” 8 2021

work page 2021
[55]

Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination,

R. T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya, and J. Shelton, “Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 116, 2022

work page 2022
[56]

Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures,

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures,” 11 2021

work page 2021
[57]

Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 observation,

V. K. Oikonomou, “Flat energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves versus peaks and the NANOGrav 2023 observation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 4, p. 043516, 2023

work page 2023
[58]

N-flationary magnetic fields,

M. M. Anber and L. Sorbo, “N-flationary magnetic fields,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 018, 2006

work page 2006
[59]

Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,

L. Sorbo, “Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 003, 2011

work page 2011
[60]

A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck,

E. Pajer and M. Peloso, “A review of Axion Inflation in the era of Planck,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 30, p. 214002, 2013

work page 2013
[61]

Gauge fields and inflation: Chiral gravitational waves, fluctuations, and the Lyth bound,

P. Adshead, E. Martinec, and M. Wyman, “Gauge fields and inflation: Chiral gravitational waves, fluctuations, and the Lyth bound,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 021302, 2013

work page 2013
[62]

Perturbations in Chromo-Natural Inflation,

P. Adshead, E. Martinec, and M. Wyman, “Perturbations in Chromo-Natural Inflation,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 087, 2013

work page 2013
[63]

Axion Inflation with an SU(2) Gauge Field: Detectable Chiral Gravity Waves,

A. Maleknejad, “Axion Inflation with an SU(2) Gauge Field: Detectable Chiral Gravity Waves,”JHEP, vol. 07, p. 104, 2016

work page 2016
[64]

Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics,

E. Dimastrogiovanni, M. Fasiello, and T. Fujita, “Primordial Gravitational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics,”JCAP, vol. 01, p. 019, 2017

work page 2017
[65]

Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion,

R. Namba, M. Peloso, M. Shiraishi, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, “Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion,”JCAP, vol. 01, p. 041, 2016

work page 2016
[66]

On the validity of the perturbative description of axions during inflation,

R. Z. Ferreira, J. Ganc, J. Noreña, and M. S. Sloth, “On the validity of the perturbative description of axions during inflation,”JCAP, vol. 04, p. 039, 2016. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2016)]

work page 2016
[67]

Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures,

M. Peloso, L. Sorbo, and C. Unal, “Rolling axions during inflation: perturbativity and signatures,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 001, 2016. – 26 –

work page 2016
[68]

Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation,

V. Domcke, M. Pieroni, and P. Binétruy, “Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 031, 2016

work page 2016
[69]

Axion Gauge Field Inflation and Gravitational Leptogenesis: A Lower Bound on B Modes from the Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe,

R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, “Axion Gauge Field Inflation and Gravitational Leptogenesis: A Lower Bound on B Modes from the Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 023532, 2018

work page 2018
[70]

Gravitational waves from inflation,

M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matarrese, “Gravitational waves from inflation,”Riv. Nuovo Cim., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 399–495, 2016

work page 2016
[71]

Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves,

N. Bartoloet al., “Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves,”JCAP, vol. 12, p. 026, 2016

work page 2016
[72]

General double monodromy inflation,

G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, and A. Westphal, “General double monodromy inflation,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, no. 10, p. 103527, 2022

work page 2022
[73]

Double Monodromy Inflation: A Gravity Waves Factory for CMB-S4, LiteBIRD and LISA,

G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, and A. Westphal, “Double Monodromy Inflation: A Gravity Waves Factory for CMB-S4, LiteBIRD and LISA,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, no. 8, p. L081302, 2021

work page 2021
[74]

Nanohertz Gravitational Waves,

A. Sesana and D. G. Figueroa, “Nanohertz Gravitational Waves,” 12 2025

work page 2025
[75]

The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,

K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, “The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 75, p. 123518, 2007

work page 2007
[76]

Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,

D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, “Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 76, p. 084019, 2007

work page 2007
[77]

Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,

G. Domènech, “Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,”Universe, vol. 7, no. 11, p. 398, 2021

work page 2021
[78]

Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data,

D. G. Figueroa, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and P. Simakachorn, “Cosmological Background Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Data,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, no. 17, p. 171002, 2024

work page 2024
[79]

Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance,

R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, “Gravitational wave background as a probe of the primordial black hole abundance,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 102, p. 161101, 2009. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 107, 069901 (2011)]

work page 2009
[80]

Gravitational-wave constraints on the abundance of primordial black holes,

R. Saito and J. Yokoyama, “Gravitational-wave constraints on the abundance of primordial black holes,”Progress of theoretical physics, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 867–886, 2010

work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.