pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13529 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · math.OC

Stabilization of finite-energy grid states of a quantum harmonic oscillator by reservoir engineering with two dissipation channels

R\'emi Robin , Pierre Rouchon , Lev-Arcady Sellem This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 13:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math.OC
keywords GKP statesquantum error correctionLindblad master equationreservoir engineeringquantum harmonic oscillatorquantum metrologydissipation channels
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Lindblad master equation with two dissipation channels approximately stabilizes finite-energy GKP grid states of a quantum harmonic oscillator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a simplified Lindblad master equation for a quantum harmonic oscillator that uses two dissipation channels to approximately stabilize periodic grid states first introduced by Gottesman, Kitaev and Preskill in 2001. These approximate finite-energy GKP states are intended for quantum error correction and quantum metrology. The work supplies explicit energy estimates for the stabilized solutions, convergence rates to the codespace, numerical analysis of noise effects, and simulations showing how parameter changes can prepare metrological states in steady state. A sympathetic reader would care because realizing such stabilization experimentally could protect quantum information in continuous-variable systems and enable more precise measurements.

Core claim

The authors propose and analyze an experimentally accessible Lindblad master equation for a quantum harmonic oscillator that employs two dissipation channels to approximately stabilize finite-energy versions of the periodic grid states introduced by Gottesman, Kitaev and Preskill. This formulation simplifies earlier proposals to ease experimental constraints while delivering estimates for the energy of the solutions and the rate at which the system converges to the codespace when stabilizing a GKP qubit.

What carries the argument

Two-channel Lindblad master equation that reservoir-engineers the oscillator to enforce approximate grid periodicity through controlled dissipation.

If this is right

  • Explicit estimates are obtained for the energy of solutions of the Lindblad master equation.
  • The convergence rate to the codespace is estimated when stabilizing a GKP qubit.
  • Numerical studies quantify the effect of noise on the stabilized states.
  • Modification of parameters allows preparation of metrological states in steady state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-channel approach could be adapted to stabilize higher-dimensional or multi-mode grid codes.
  • Successful implementation might reduce the experimental overhead compared with single-channel or more complex reservoir designs.
  • The finite-energy approximation suggests a natural pathway to study error thresholds under realistic damping.

Load-bearing premise

The two dissipation channels can be realized experimentally with sufficient isolation from other noise and the Markovian Lindblad approximation remains valid on the timescales needed for stabilization.

What would settle it

An experiment that implements the proposed two dissipation channels on a quantum harmonic oscillator and checks whether the steady-state wavefunction matches the predicted finite-energy GKP grid form within the calculated energy bounds and convergence time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13529 by Lev-Arcady Sellem, Pierre Rouchon, R\'emi Robin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Long-time simulations of Eq. (4); initialized in vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Evolution of an initial logical | + X⟩ state in the presence of photon loss. Top. Without stabilization, that is under d dtρ = κD[a](ρ), any state of a harmonic oscillator converges to vacuum (exponentially fast with a characteristic time 1/κ). Bottom. With the stabilization, that is under d dtρ = D[M1](ρ) + D[M2](ρ) + κD[a](ρ), the GKP space is protected but logical coherences inside that space are lost (… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Decay of logical observables for ϵ = 0.15 and κ = 10−2 . Following [11], we study the decay of the constrast between two opposite logical states along time (rather than values on a specific state) to easily get rid of final values on the steady￾state of the dynamics. The different rate observed for Y compared to X and Z is a well-known feature of square GKP codes, due to the fact that X and Z approximate a… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Decay rate of the expectation value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Steady-state of d dtρ = D[M1](ρ) +D[M2](ρ) +κD[a](ρ) as a function of the relative single-photon loss rate κ. Here η = p π/2 and ϵ = 0.15. 8 POSSIBLE IMPLEMENTATIONS In practice, the Lindblad equation (4) models a quantum harmonic oscillator cou￾pled to an unrealistic exotic bath. It can, however, be approximated through reser￾voir engineering methods as used in previous GKP proposals [11] or for other bos… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose and analyze an experimentally accessible Lindblad master equation for a quantum harmonic oscillator, simplifying a previous proposal to alleviate implementation constraints. It approximately stabilizes periodic grid states introduced in 2001 by Gottesman, Kitaev and Preskill (GKP), with applications for quantum error correction and quantum metrology. We obtain explicit estimates for the energy of the solutions of the Lindblad master equation. We estimate the convergence rate to the codespace when stabilizing a GKP qubit, and numerically study the effect of noise. We then present simulations illustrating how a modification of parameters allows preparing states of metrological interest in steady-state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and analyzes a simplified Lindblad master equation with two dissipation channels for a quantum harmonic oscillator. This equation approximately stabilizes finite-energy periodic grid states (GKP states) from Gottesman, Kitaev and Preskill. The authors derive explicit energy estimates for the solutions of the master equation, provide bounds on the convergence rate to the codespace when stabilizing a GKP qubit, perform numerical studies of noise effects, and simulate parameter modifications to prepare states of metrological interest in steady state.

Significance. If the stabilization, energy bounds, and convergence rates hold as stated, the work supplies a more experimentally tractable reservoir-engineering route to GKP-state stabilization. The explicit estimates, rate bounds, and numerical noise/metrology studies constitute concrete strengths that would aid both theoretical follow-up and experimental design in quantum error correction and metrology.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that explicit energy estimates and convergence-rate bounds are obtained; the main text should include a dedicated subsection that isolates the key inequalities and the assumptions under which they apply (e.g., the precise form of the two Lindblad operators and the finite-energy cutoff).
  2. Numerical noise studies are mentioned; the corresponding figures would benefit from explicit captions stating the noise model, the number of trajectories or ensemble size, and the precise metrological figure of merit being plotted.
  3. A brief comparison paragraph or table contrasting the two-channel dissipators with the earlier multi-channel proposal would clarify the implementation simplifications achieved.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the scope and contributions of our work on the two-channel Lindblad master equation for approximate stabilization of finite-energy GKP grid states, including the energy estimates, convergence bounds, and numerical studies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation rests on explicit Lindblad construction and bounds

full rationale

The paper constructs a two-channel Lindblad master equation whose dissipators are explicitly designed so that approximate GKP grid states lie in the kernel. Energy estimates, convergence-rate bounds, and numerical studies follow directly from the form of these operators and standard Lindblad theory. The simplification of a prior proposal is presented as an engineering improvement rather than a load-bearing premise; the central stabilization claims are supported by independent analytic estimates and simulations that do not reduce to fitted parameters or self-citation chains. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own prior work appear in the derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal relies on the standard Lindblad form for Markovian open quantum systems and the definition of GKP codes; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system evolution is governed by a time-independent Lindblad master equation in the Markovian regime.
    Standard assumption in quantum optics and reservoir engineering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5406 in / 1127 out tokens · 41212 ms · 2026-05-10T13:09:07.548654+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Michael et al

    M. Michael et al. New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode.Physical Review X, 6(3):031006, July 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro. Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping.Phys- ical Review A, 59(4):2631–2634, April 1999

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Encoding a qubit in an oscillator.Physical Review A, 64(1):012310, June 2001

    Daniel Gottesman, Alexei Kitaev, and John Preskill. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator.Physical Review A, 64(1):012310, June 2001

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Campagne-Ibarcq, A

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys-Geller, N. E. Frat- tini, V . V . Sivak, P. Reinhold, S. Puri, S. Shankar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Frun- zio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret. Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator.Nature, 584(7821):368–372, August 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    de Neeve et al

    B. de Neeve et al. Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping.Nature Physics, 18:296–300, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    V . V . Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, S. Singh, I. Tsioutsios, S. Ganjam, A. Miano, B. L. Brock, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret. Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even. Nature, 616(7955):50–55, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Brock, Shraddha Singh, Alec Eickbusch, V olodymyr V

    Benjamin L. Brock, Shraddha Singh, Alec Eickbusch, V olodymyr V . Sivak, Andy Z. Ding, Luigi Frunzio, Steven M. Girvin, and Michel H. Devoret. Quantum Error Correction of Qudits Beyond Break-even, September 2024. 16

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Autonomous Quantum Error Correction of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States.Physical Review Letters, 132(15), 2024

    Dany Lachance-Quirion. Autonomous Quantum Error Correction of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States.Physical Review Letters, 132(15), 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Fl ¨uhmann, T

    C. Fl ¨uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V . Negnevitsky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home. Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator.Nature, 566(7745):513–517, February 2019

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    V . G. Matsos, C. H. Valahu, T. Navickas, A. D. Rao, M. J. Millican, M. J. Biercuk, and T. R. Tan. Robust and Deterministic Preparation of Bosonic Logical States in a Trapped Ion, October 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Sellem, A

    L.-A. Sellem, A. Sarlette, Z. Leghtas, M. Mirrahimi, P. Rouchon, and P. Campagne-Ibarcq. Dissipative Protection of a GKP Qubit in a High- Impedance Superconducting Circuit Driven by a Microwave Frequency Comb.Physical Review X, 15(1):011011, January 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Stability and decoherence rates of a GKP qubit protected by dis- sipation

    Lev-Arcady Sellem, R ´emi Robin, Philippe Campagne-Ibarcq, and Pierre Rouchon. Stability and decoherence rates of a GKP qubit protected by dis- sipation. InIFAC-PapersOnLine, volume 56 of22nd IFAC World Congress, pages 1325–1332, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Exponential convergence of a dissipative quan- tum system towards finite-energy grid states of an oscillator

    Lev-Arcady Sellem, Philippe Campagne-Ibarcq, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Alain Sarlette, and Pierre Rouchon. Exponential convergence of a dissipative quan- tum system towards finite-energy grid states of an oscillator. In2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 5149–5154, Decem- ber 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Matheny, Arne L

    Frederik Nathan, Liam O’Brien, Kyungjoo Noh, Matthew H. Matheny, Arne L. Grimsmo, Liang Jiang, and Gil Refael. Self-Correcting Gottesman- Kitaev-Preskill Qubit and Gates in a Driven-Dissipative Circuit.PRX Quan- tum, 6(3):030352, September 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Self-correcting GKP qubit in a supercon- ducting circuit with an oscillating voltage bias, December 2024

    Max Geier and Frederik Nathan. Self-correcting GKP qubit in a supercon- ducting circuit with an oscillating voltage bias, December 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Terhal, and Daniel Weigand

    Kasper Duivenvoorden, Barbara M. Terhal, and Daniel Weigand. Single- mode displacement sensor.Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Opti- cal Physics, 95(1):012305, January 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Valahu, Matthew P

    Christophe H. Valahu, Matthew P. Stafford, Zixin Huang, Vassili G. Matsos, Maverick J. Millican, Teerawat Chalermpusitarak, Nicolas C. Menicucci, Joshua Combes, Ben Q. Baragiola, and Ting Rei Tan. Quantum- enhanced multiparameter sensing in a single mode.Science Advances, 11(39):eadw9757, September 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Quan- tum Sensing of Displacements with Stabilized Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States.PRX Quantum, 7(2):020301, April 2026

    Lautaro Labarca, Sara Turcotte, Alexandre Blais, and Baptiste Royer. Quan- tum Sensing of Displacements with Stabilized Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill States.PRX Quantum, 7(2):020301, April 2026. 17

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    Equivalence of approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes.Physical Review A, 102(3):032408, 2020

    Takaya Matsuura, Hayata Yamasaki, and Masato Koashi. Equivalence of approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes.Physical Review A, 102(3):032408, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas.Physical Review A, 71(2):022316, February 2005

    Sergey Bravyi and Alexei Kitaev. Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas.Physical Review A, 71(2):022316, February 2005

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    Ding, Salvatore S

    Alec Eickbusch, V olodymyr Sivak, Andy Z. Ding, Salvatore S. Elder, Shan- tanu R. Jha, Jayameenakshi Venkatraman, Baptiste Royer, S. M. Girvin, Robert J. Schoelkopf, and Michel H. Devoret. Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit.Nature Physics, 18(12):1464–1469, December 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Heeres, Brian Vlastakis, Eric Holland, Stefan Krastanov, Victor V

    Reinier W. Heeres, Brian Vlastakis, Eric Holland, Stefan Krastanov, Victor V . Albert, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Cavity State Manipulation Using Photon-Number Selective Phase Gates.Physical Review Letters, 115(13):137002, September 2015

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator

    Rapha ¨el Lescanne, Marius Villiers, Th´eau Peronnin, Alain Sarlette, Matthieu Delbecq, Benjamin Huard, Takis Kontos, Mazyar Mirrahimi, and Zaki Legh- tas. Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator. Nature Physics, 16(5):509–513, May 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Wineland, C

    D.J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W.M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B.E. King, and D.M. Meekhof. Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions.Journal of Research of the National Institute of Stan- dards and Technology, 103(3):259, May 1998

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    Millican, Vassili G

    Cameron McGarry, Teerawat Chalermpusitarak, Kai Schwennicke, Frank Scuccimarra, Maverick J. Millican, Vassili G. Matsos, Christophe H. Valahu, Prachi Nagpal, Hon-Kwan Chan, Henry L. Nourse, Ivan Kassal, and Ting Rei Tan. Programmable quantum simulation of anharmonic dynamics, March 2026

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Gottesman-Kitaev- Preskill codes: A lattice perspective.Quantum, 6:648, 2022

    Jonathan Conrad, Jens Eisert, and Francesco Arzani. Gottesman-Kitaev- Preskill codes: A lattice perspective.Quantum, 6:648, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Baptiste Royer, Shraddha Singh, and S.M. Girvin. Encoding Qubits in Mul- timode Grid States.PRX Quantum, 3(1):010335, March 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Jha, Shoumik Chowdhury, Gabriele Rolleri, Max Hays, Jeff A

    Shantanu R. Jha, Shoumik Chowdhury, Gabriele Rolleri, Max Hays, Jeff A. Grover, and William D. Oliver. JAXQuantum: An auto-differentiable and hardware-accelerated toolkit for quantum hardware design, simulation, and control, 2025. 18

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Dynamiqs: An open-source Python library for GPU-accelerated and differentiable simulation of quantum systems

    Pierre Guilmin, Adrien Bocquet, ´Elie Genois, Daniel Weiss, and Ronan Gau- tier. Dynamiqs: An open-source Python library for GPU-accelerated and differentiable simulation of quantum systems. 2025. 19

    work page 2025