pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14449 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Crowdsourcing of Real-world Image Annotation via Visual Properties

Xiaolei Diao , Fausto Giunchiglia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords crowdsourcingimage annotationvisual propertiesobject recognitionsemantic gapinteractive frameworkcomputer visiondata labeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

An interactive crowdsourcing framework uses visual property constraints and object category hierarchies to reduce subjectivity in image annotations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a methodology that combines knowledge representation, natural language processing, and computer vision to address the semantic gap between images and their descriptions in object recognition datasets. It introduces an interactive crowdsourcing system that dynamically generates questions from a predefined object category hierarchy and annotator responses to enforce constraints based on visual properties. This setup aims to produce more consistent labels by limiting the influence of individual annotator interpretations. The approach is tested through experiments, with results and annotator feedback used to refine the question-asking process.

Core claim

By guiding image annotation through visual property constraints within a predefined object category hierarchy via an interactive crowdsourcing framework that adapts questions based on annotator feedback, the methodology reduces annotator subjectivity in real-world image labeling.

What carries the argument

The interactive crowdsourcing framework that dynamically poses questions derived from a predefined object category hierarchy and visual properties, adapting based on annotator responses to enforce consistent constraints.

Load-bearing premise

Visual property constraints together with a predefined object category hierarchy will reliably reduce annotator subjectivity without introducing new systematic biases or increasing annotation cost.

What would settle it

A head-to-head comparison in which annotators label the same images both with and without the visual property questions shows no improvement in inter-annotator agreement or a substantial rise in total time spent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14449 by Fausto Giunchiglia, Xiaolei Diao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Images and their labels in existing image datasets. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in data-centric artificial intelligence highlight inherent limitations in object recognition datasets. One of the primary issues stems from the semantic gap problem, which results in complex many-to-many mappings between visual data and linguistic descriptions. This bias adversely affects performance in computer vision tasks. This paper proposes an image annotation methodology that integrates knowledge representation, natural language processing, and computer vision techniques, aiming to reduce annotator subjectivity by applying visual property constraints. We introduce an interactive crowdsourcing framework that dynamically asks questions based on a predefined object category hierarchy and annotator feedback, guiding image annotation by visual properties. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology, and annotator feedback is discussed to optimize the crowdsourcing setup.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an interactive crowdsourcing framework for annotating real-world images that integrates knowledge representation, natural language processing, and computer vision. It uses a predefined object category hierarchy together with dynamic questions on visual properties, selected based on annotator feedback, with the goal of reducing subjectivity in annotations. The abstract states that experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach and that annotator feedback is discussed for optimization.

Significance. If the central claim holds and the framework measurably lowers annotator variance without new biases or prohibitive cost, the work would be significant for data-centric AI. Higher-quality annotations could narrow the semantic gap between images and linguistic labels, yielding more reliable training data for object recognition and related CV tasks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology' is unsupported by any quantitative results, baselines, inter-annotator agreement deltas, ablation studies, or cost measurements. This directly undermines the empirical foundation of the central claim that visual-property constraints plus the hierarchy reduce subjectivity.
  2. [Methodology / Experiments] Methodology and Experiments: no evidence or controls are described that isolate the contribution of the object-category hierarchy from the visual-property questions, nor any test confirming that the hierarchy itself is free of systematic bias or that question selection avoids steering annotators toward correlated errors. These factors are load-bearing for the claim that subjectivity is reliably reduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important areas where the empirical support and methodological details need clarification or expansion. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology' is unsupported by any quantitative results, baselines, inter-annotator agreement deltas, ablation studies, or cost measurements. This directly undermines the empirical foundation of the central claim that visual-property constraints plus the hierarchy reduce subjectivity.

    Authors: We agree with this assessment. The current version of the paper describes the interactive framework and discusses annotator feedback in a qualitative manner but does not include the quantitative evaluations referenced. We will revise the abstract to accurately reflect the manuscript's content, removing the claim of demonstrated effectiveness and instead emphasizing the proposed methodology's design for reducing subjectivity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methodology / Experiments] Methodology and Experiments: no evidence or controls are described that isolate the contribution of the object-category hierarchy from the visual-property questions, nor any test confirming that the hierarchy itself is free of systematic bias or that question selection avoids steering annotators toward correlated errors. These factors are load-bearing for the claim that subjectivity is reliably reduced.

    Authors: The manuscript integrates these elements in the framework description but does not provide isolating controls, bias tests, or error correlation analyses. This is a valid concern. We will revise the methodology section to better explain the rationale and potential limitations regarding bias in the hierarchy and question selection. However, without additional data collection, we cannot add new empirical isolations at this stage. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative experimental validation including baselines, inter-annotator agreement metrics, ablations, and cost analyses, since these were not conducted in the original work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical methodology with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper describes an interactive crowdsourcing framework that combines knowledge representation, NLP, and CV techniques to guide annotation via visual properties and a category hierarchy. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation chains appear in the provided text. The effectiveness claim is presented as resting on experiments rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. This is a standard non-circular proposal of a practical annotation method.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the utility of visual properties and hierarchies rather than on new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Visual properties can be used to constrain annotations and thereby reduce subjectivity
    Invoked as the core mechanism for guiding the crowdsourcing process.
  • domain assumption A predefined object category hierarchy exists and can be used to generate useful dynamic questions
    Required for the interactive questioning framework described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5407 in / 1153 out tokens · 37082 ms · 2026-05-10T12:49:12.440256+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Daniel, P

    F. Daniel, P. Kucherbaev, C. Cappiello, B. Benatallah, and M. Allahbakhsh. Quality control in crowdsourcing: A survey of quality attributes, assessment techniques, and assurance actions.ACM Computing Surveys, 51(1):1–40, 2018. 8

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Managing bias in human-annotated data: Moving beyond bias removal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.13504, 2021

    Gianluca Demartini, Kevin Roitero, and Stefano Mizzaro. Managing bias in human-annotated data: Moving beyond bias removal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.13504, 2021. 8

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. InIEEE Conf. computer vision and pattern recog- nition, pages 248–255, 2009. 1

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Building a visual semantics aware object hier- archy

    Xiaolei Diao. Building a visual semantics aware object hier- archy. InProceedings of the 31st International Joint Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence and the 25th European Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-ECAI 2022, 2022. 8

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    A semantics-driven methodology for high- quality image annotation

    Xiaolei Diao. A semantics-driven methodology for high- quality image annotation. 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Toward zero-shot char- acter recognition: a gold standard dataset with radical-level annotations

    Xiaolei Diao, Daqian Shi, Jian Li, Lida Shi, Mingzhe Yue, Ruihua Qi, Chuntao Li, and Hao Xu. Toward zero-shot char- acter recognition: a gold standard dataset with radical-level annotations. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 6869–6877, 2023. 8

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Everingham, L

    M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge.International Journal of Computer Vision, 88(2): 303–338, 2010. 1

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    are machines better than humans in image tagging?

    Ralph Ewerth, Matthias Springstein, Lo An Phan-V ogtmann, and Juliane Sch ¨utze. “are machines better than humans in image tagging?”-a user study adds to the puzzle. InECIR, pages 186–198. Springer, 2017. 8

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Aligning visual and lexical semantics

    Fausto Giunchiglia, Mayukh Bagchi, and Xiaolei Diao. Aligning visual and lexical semantics. InInternational Con- ference on Information, pages 294–302, 2023. 2, 3

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    A semantics-driven methodology for high-quality image anno- tation

    Fausto Giunchiglia, Mayukh Bagchi, and Xiaolei Diao. A semantics-driven methodology for high-quality image anno- tation. InEuropean Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 2023. 1, 3

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Incremental image labeling via iterative refinement

    Fausto Giunchiglia, Xiaolei Diao, and Mayukh Bagchi. Incremental image labeling via iterative refinement. In IWCIM@ICASSP, 2023. 4

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. InConference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2016), pages 770–778, 2016. 6

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Squeeze-and-excitation networks

    Jie Hu, Li Shen, and Gang Sun. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. InConference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2018), pages 7132–7141, 2018. 6

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Huang, Z.ang Liu, L

    G. Huang, Z.ang Liu, L. VanDer Maaten, and KQ. Wein- berger. Densely connected convolutional networks. InCon- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017), 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Krippendorffsalpha: An r package for measur- ing agreement using krippendorff’s alpha coefficient.The R Journal, 1(1), 2021

    John Hughes. Krippendorffsalpha: An r package for measur- ing agreement using krippendorff’s alpha coefficient.The R Journal, 1(1), 2021. Also: arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12170. 4

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Data-centric artificial intelli- gence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.11854, 2022

    Johannes Jakubik, Michael V ¨ossing, Niklas K ¨uhl, Jannis Walk, and Gerhard Satzger. Data-centric artificial intelli- gence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.11854, 2022. 1

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Canons in analytico-synthetic classification

    Prithvi N Kaula. Canons in analytico-synthetic classification. KO KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 7(3):118–125, 1980. 2, 3

    work page 1980

  18. [18]

    Openimages: A public dataset for large-scale multi-label and multi-class image classification.Dataset available from https://storage.googleapis.com/openimages/web/index.html,

    Ivan Krasin, Tom Duerig, Neil Alldrin, Vittorio Ferrari, Sami Abu-El-Haija, Alina Kuznetsova, Hassan Rom, Jasper Uijlings, Stefan Popov, Shahab Kamali, Matteo Malloci, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Andreas Veit, Serge Belongie, Victor Gomes, Abhinav Gupta, Chen Sun, Gal Chechik, David Cai, Zheyun Feng, Dhyanesh Narayanan, and Kevin Murphy. Openimages: A public datase...

    work page

  19. [19]

    Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images

    Alex Krizhevsky, Geoffrey Hinton, et al. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009. 1

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Krizhevsky, I

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and GE Hinton. Imagenet clas- sification with deep convolutional neural networks.Neurips,

    work page

  21. [21]

    Kyriakou, P

    K. Kyriakou, P. Barlas, S. Kleanthous, E. Christoforou, and J. Otterbacher. Crowdsourcing human oversight on image tagging algorithms: An initial study of image diversity. 2021. 8

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Human computation

    Edith Law and Luis V on Ahn. Human computation. 2011. 1

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Fcc: Feature clusters com- pression for long-tailed visual recognition

    Jian Li, Ziyao Meng, Daqian Shi, Rui Song, Xiaolei Diao, Jingwen Wang, and Hao Xu. Fcc: Feature clusters com- pression for long-tailed visual recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 24080–24089, 2023. 8

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Microsoft coco: Common objects in context

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014. 1

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Wordnet: a lexical database for english

    George A Miller. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39–41, 1995. 2

    work page 1995

  26. [26]

    Assessing data quality of annotations with krip- pendorff alpha for applications in computer vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10107, 2019

    Joseph Nassar, Viveca Pavon-Harr, Marc Bosch, and Ian Mc- Culloh. Assessing data quality of annotations with krip- pendorff alpha for applications in computer vision.arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.10107, 2019. 8

    work page arXiv 1912

  27. [27]

    How reliable are annota- tions via crowdsourcing: a study about inter-annotator agree- ment for multi-label image annotation

    Stefanie Nowak and Stefan R ¨uger. How reliable are annota- tions via crowdsourcing: a study about inter-annotator agree- ment for multi-label image annotation. InIEEE-MIPR, pages 557–566, 2010. 8

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Data and its (dis) contents: A survey of dataset development and use in ma- chine learning research.Patterns, 2(11):100336, 2021

    Amandalynne Paullada, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Emily M Bender, Emily Denton, and Alex Hanna. Data and its (dis) contents: A survey of dataset development and use in ma- chine learning research.Patterns, 2(11):100336, 2021. 8

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (Ban- galore, India), 1989

    S R Ranganathan.Philosophy of library classification. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science (Ban- galore, India), 1989. 3

    work page 1989

  30. [30]

    YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement

    Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement.arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767, 2018. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    A learning path recommendation model based on a multidimensional knowledge graph framework for e-learning.Knowledge- Based Systems, 195:105618, 2020

    Daqian Shi, Ting Wang, Hao Xing, and Hao Xu. A learning path recommendation model based on a multidimensional knowledge graph framework for e-learning.Knowledge- Based Systems, 195:105618, 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Kae: A property-based method for knowledge graph alignment and extension.Journal of Web Semantics, 82:100832, 2024

    Daqian Shi, Xiaoyue Li, and Fausto Giunchiglia. Kae: A property-based method for knowledge graph alignment and extension.Journal of Web Semantics, 82:100832, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Competitive distillation: A simple learning strategy for improving visual classification

    Daqian Shi, Xiaolei Diao, Xu Chen, and C ´edric M John. Competitive distillation: A simple learning strategy for improving visual classification. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2981–2990, 2025. 1

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Learn from the best: A universal self-distillation approach with historical logits.Expert Systems with Applications, page 129340, 2025

    Lida Shi, Fausto Giunchiglia, Hongda Zhang, Daqian Shi, Rui Song, Jian Li, Xiaolei Diao, Alan Zhao, and Hao Xu. Learn from the best: A universal self-distillation approach with historical logits.Expert Systems with Applications, page 129340, 2025. 8

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    A survey of hierarchi- cal classification across different application domains.Data mining and knowledge discovery, 22:31–72, 2011

    Carlos N Silla and Alex A Freitas. A survey of hierarchi- cal classification across different application domains.Data mining and knowledge discovery, 22:31–72, 2011. 3

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Very deep convo- lutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convo- lutional networks for large-scale image recognition. InICLR,

    work page

  37. [37]

    Systematic review of data-centric approaches in artificial intelligence and machine learning.Data Science and Management, 2023

    Prerna Singh. Systematic review of data-centric approaches in artificial intelligence and machine learning.Data Science and Management, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Smeulders, M

    A. Smeulders, M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 2000. 2, 8

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    Going deeper with convolutions

    Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, and et al. Going deeper with convolutions. InConference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2015), pages 1–9, 2015. 6

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Unbiased look at dataset bias

    Antonio Torralba and Alexei A Efros. Unbiased look at dataset bias. InConference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2011), pages 1521–1528. IEEE, 2011. 8

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    Tsipras, S

    D. Tsipras, S. Santurkar, L. Engstrom, A. Ilyas, and A. Madry. From imagenet to image classification: Contextualiz- ing progress on benchmarks. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2020), pages 9625–9635. PMLR,

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Semantic wikipedia

    Max V ¨olkel, Markus Kr ¨otzsch, Denny Vrandecic, Heiko Haller, and Rudi Studer. Semantic wikipedia. InProceed- ings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 585–594, 2006. 2

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    Residual attention network for image classification

    Fei Wang, Mengqing Jiang, Chen Qian, Shuo Yang, Cheng Li, Honggang Zhang, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. Residual attention network for image classification. InCon- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017), pages 3156–3164, 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    K. Yang, K. Qinami, L. Fei-Fei, J. Deng, and O. Rus- sakovsky. Towards fairer datasets: Filtering and balancing the distribution of the people subtree in the imagenet hierar- chy. InFACT Conf., pages 547–558, 2020. 8

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    S. Yun, Sj. Oh, B. Heo, D. Han, J. Choe, and S. Chun. Re- labeling imagenet: from single to multi-labels, from global to localized labels. InConference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2021), pages 2340–2350, 2021. 8

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Visualizing and under- standing convolutional networks

    Matthew D Zeiler and Rob Fergus. Visualizing and under- standing convolutional networks. InECCV, pages 818–833. Springer, 2014. 6

    work page 2014