Spinning Living Crystals of Run-and-Tumble Particles with Environmental Feedback
Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:44 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Feedback from passive particles stabilizes spinning living crystals in non-chiral active matter.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
At intermediate densities, feedback from a fluctuating landscape of passive Brownian particles stabilizes large living crystals of obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble agents, producing collective solid-like spinning for particles with long persistence times approaching ballistic motion rather than conventional enhanced diffusion. This environmental feedback coordinates the self-organization of non-chiral active particles into structures with sustained rotations, revealing a route to collective rotational order that depends on the dynamic passive environment.
What carries the argument
The fluctuating landscape of passive Brownian particles, which provides environmental feedback to stabilize and coordinate obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble particles into large rotating living crystals.
If this is right
- Collective rotations enhance cohesion, transport, and mixing in active matter without needing intrinsic particle chirality or torque-generating interactions among units.
- Living crystals form with qualitatively distinct dynamics, showing solid-like spinning specifically for long persistence times approaching ballistic motion.
- Active materials can be engineered with unconventional dynamical responses by incorporating feedback from a dynamic passive environment.
- Self-organization of non-chiral active particles into ordered rotating structures depends on optimal intermediate densities of the fluctuating obstacles.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- This environmental feedback route to rotational order could apply to biological systems where active agents like bacteria interact with fluctuating passive components in their surroundings.
- The mechanism suggests that controlling the fluctuation strength or density of passive particles offers a tunable way to switch between diffusive and spinning collective states.
- Extending the model to include different passive particle mobilities or interaction strengths could map out broader phase diagrams for environment-induced collective rotations.
Load-bearing premise
The specific model of obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble dynamics interacting with passive Brownian particles is sufficient to produce the reported rotational order without additional unstated interaction details or tuning.
What would settle it
Simulations or experiments in which passive particles are removed or made static should fail to stabilize large spinning living crystals at intermediate densities for long-persistence run-and-tumble agents.
Figures
read the original abstract
Collective rotations are common in active matter, enhancing cohesion, transport, and mixing. They are typically attributed to chiral non-reciprocal dynamics due to intrinsic particle chirality, torque-generating interactions among units, or geometric confinement. Here, we uncover a different mechanism for rotational order in active matter where a dynamic environment coordinates the self-organization of non-chiral active particles into living crystals exhibiting sustained collective solid-like rotations. At intermediate densities, feedback from a fluctuating landscape of passive Brownian particles stabilizes large living crystals of obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble agents. Strikingly, this environmental feedback also produces living crystals with qualitatively distinct dynamics: collective solid-like spinning emerges for particles with long persistence times approaching ballistic motion, rather than for particles moving by conventional enhanced diffusion. Beyond revealing a new route to collective rotational order in active matter, these findings highlight the integral role of a dynamic environment in self-organization and suggest environment-mediated design principles for active materials with unconventional dynamical responses.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims that a fluctuating environment of passive Brownian particles provides feedback that stabilizes large living crystals formed by non-chiral, obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble particles at intermediate densities. These crystals exhibit collective solid-like rotations specifically when the active particles have long persistence times approaching ballistic motion, rather than conventional enhanced diffusion. This is presented as a novel mechanism for rotational order in active matter that does not rely on intrinsic particle chirality, torque-generating interactions, or geometric confinement.
Significance. If the simulation results hold, the work identifies a distinct route to collective rotational order driven by environmental feedback, underscoring the role of dynamic surroundings in active-matter self-organization. The explicit particle-based simulations constitute a concrete, falsifiable demonstration that could inform environment-mediated design principles for active materials with unconventional dynamical responses.
major comments (2)
- [Results section on collective spinning] Results section on collective spinning: the central claim that fluctuating passive particles are required to stabilize the spinning living crystals is not supported by reported control simulations in which the passive particles are either removed entirely or immobilized (frozen). Without these controls, it remains possible that the observed collective rotation emerges from the obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble rules alone at long persistence times, undermining the asserted necessity of environmental feedback.
- [Model and simulation methods] Model and simulation methods: the abstract and main text state that spinning occurs 'at intermediate densities' and 'for particles with long persistence times,' yet no quantitative bounds, density sweeps, or persistence-time dependence of the rotational order parameter (with error bars or ensemble statistics) are provided. This absence makes it difficult to assess the robustness of the reported phase and the load-bearing role of the fluctuating landscape.
minor comments (1)
- [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the number of independent runs, system size, and how the rotational order parameter is computed to allow direct reproducibility.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen our claims.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Results section on collective spinning: the central claim that fluctuating passive particles are required to stabilize the spinning living crystals is not supported by reported control simulations in which the passive particles are either removed entirely or immobilized (frozen). Without these controls, it remains possible that the observed collective rotation emerges from the obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble rules alone at long persistence times, undermining the asserted necessity of environmental feedback.
Authors: We agree that explicit control simulations are essential to demonstrate the necessity of the fluctuating passive particles for stabilizing the spinning crystals. The original manuscript emphasized the role of environmental feedback through comparisons at different conditions, but did not include the specific controls of removing or freezing the passive particles. To address this, we have performed additional simulations: (1) with no passive particles present, and (2) with passive particles immobilized. In both cases, the large-scale collective rotations are absent or significantly diminished, particularly at long persistence times. These new results will be incorporated into the revised Results section, including a new figure panel showing the rotational order parameter for these controls. This confirms that the dynamic environment is indeed required for the observed phenomenon. revision: yes
-
Referee: Model and simulation methods: the abstract and main text state that spinning occurs 'at intermediate densities' and 'for particles with long persistence times,' yet no quantitative bounds, density sweeps, or persistence-time dependence of the rotational order parameter (with error bars or ensemble statistics) are provided. This absence makes it difficult to assess the robustness of the reported phase and the load-bearing role of the fluctuating landscape.
Authors: We acknowledge that providing quantitative details on the parameter ranges and statistical analysis would improve the clarity and robustness assessment. While the manuscript includes results across a range of densities and persistence times, we have now added systematic sweeps. Specifically, we have included a new figure displaying the rotational order parameter as a function of particle density and persistence time, averaged over multiple independent simulations with error bars indicating the standard deviation. This quantifies the intermediate density regime (approximately 0.3 to 0.6 in reduced units) and the long persistence time regime (persistence times greater than 10^3 simulation units) where spinning is stable. These additions will be detailed in the revised Model and simulation methods and Results sections. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: results from explicit simulations
full rationale
The paper reports outcomes of direct numerical simulations of obstacle-avoiding run-and-tumble particles coupled to passive Brownian particles. No mathematical derivation, prediction, or first-principles result is presented that reduces by construction to its own inputs via self-definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. The central claim about environmental feedback stabilizing spinning living crystals is an observed simulation outcome at intermediate densities and long persistence times, not a tautological restatement of model assumptions. Any self-citations (if present) are not load-bearing for the reported collective dynamics.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- particle density
- persistence time
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Run-and-tumble dynamics with obstacle avoidance
- standard math Brownian motion for passive particles
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, P. M. Chaikin,Science2013,339, 936–940
-
[2]
C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, G. Volpe,Rev. Mod. Phys.2016,88, 045006
work page 2016
-
[3]
A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, A. Libchaber,Phys. Rev. Lett.2015,114, 158102
work page 2015
-
[4]
T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, N. Fakhri,Nature2022, 607, 287–293
- [5]
-
[6]
C. S. Dias, M. Trivedi, G. Volpe, N. A. M. Ara´ ujo, G. Volpe,Nat. Commun.2023,14, 7324
work page 2023
- [7]
-
[8]
J. Wang, G. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Wang, D. Yuan, X. Ma, X. Xu, Z. Cheng, B. Ji, M. Yang, J. Shuai, F. Ye, J. Wang, Y. Jiao, L. Liu,Nat. Commun.2024,15, 8853
work page 2024
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
-
[13]
D. Canavello, R. H. Damascena, L. R. E. Cabral, C. C. De Souza Silva,Soft Matter2024,20, 2310–2320
- [14]
-
[15]
F. A. Lavergne, H. Wendehenne, T. B¨ auerle, C. Bechinger,Science2019,364, 70–74
-
[16]
B.-Q. Ai, S. Quan, F.-g. Li,New J. Phys.2023,25, 063025
work page 2023
- [17]
-
[18]
S. Kole, G. P. Alexander, S. Ramaswamy, A. Maitra,Phys. Rev. Lett.2021,126, 248001
work page 2021
-
[19]
V. Soni, E. S. Bililign, S. Magkiriadou, S. Sacanna, D. Bartolo, M. J. Shelley, W. T. M. Irvine,Nat. Phys.2019,15, 1188–1194
work page 2019
-
[20]
E. S. Bililign, F. Balboa Usabiaga, Y. A. Ganan, A. Poncet, V. Soni, S. Magkiriadou, M. J. Shelley, D. Bartolo, W. T. M. Irvine,Nat. Phys.2022,18, 212–218
work page 2022
-
[21]
N. A. Ara´ ujo, L. M. Janssen, T. Barois, G. Boffetta, I. Cohen, A. Corbetta, O. Dauchot, M. Dijkstra, W. M. Durham, A. Dussutour, et al.,Soft Matter2023,19, 1695–1704
-
[22]
A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, N. Desreumaux, O. Dauchot, D. Bartolo,Nature2013,503, 95–98
-
[23]
J. Yan, M. Han, J. Zhang, C. Xu, E. Luijten, S. Granick,Nat. Mater.2016,15, 1095–1099
work page 2016
- [24]
-
[25]
A. Filella, F. Nadal, C. Sire, E. Kanso, C. Eloy,Phys. Rev. Lett.2018,120, 198101
work page 2018
-
[26]
B. Liebchen, D. Levis,Phys. Rev. Lett.2017,119, 058002. 13 REFERENCES REFERENCES
work page 2017
-
[27]
S. Liu, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, Y. Wu,Nature2021,590, 80–84
-
[28]
A. Bricard, J.-B. Caussin, D. Das, C. Savoie, V. Chikkadi, K. Shitara, O. Chepizhko, F. Peruani, D. Saintillan, D. Bartolo,Nat. Commun.2015,6, 7470
work page 2015
- [29]
-
[30]
H. C. Berg,E. coli in Motion, Springer,2004
work page 2004
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
-
[34]
H. Huo, R. He, R. Zhang, J. Yuan,Appl. Environ. Microbiol.2021,87, (Ed.: G. Alexandre), e02429–20
work page 2021
-
[35]
T. A. Waigh, N. Korabel,Rep. Prog. Phys.2023,86, 126601
work page 2023
- [36]
-
[37]
V. Zaburdaev, I. Fouxon, S. Denisov, E. Barkai,Phys. Rev. Lett.2016,117, 270601
work page 2016
-
[38]
G. M. Viswanathan, M. G. Da Luz, E. P. Raposo, H. E. Stanley,The Physics of Foraging: an Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters, Cambridge University Press,2011
work page 2011
- [39]
-
[40]
I. Buttinoni, J. Bialk´ e, F. K¨ ummel, H. L¨ owen, C. Bechinger, T. Speck,Phys. Rev. Lett.2013,110, 238301
work page 2013
-
[41]
B. M. Mognetti, A. ˇSari´ c, S. Angioletti-Uberti, A. Cacciuto, C. Valeriani, D. Frenkel,Phys. Rev. Lett.2013,111, 245702
work page 2013
- [42]
-
[43]
S. Makarchuk, V. C. Braz, N. A. M. Ara´ ujo, L. Ciric, G. Volpe,Nat. Commun.2019,10, 4110
work page 2019
-
[44]
S. Das, A. Garg, A. I. Campbell, J. Howse, A. Sen, D. Velegol, R. Golestanian, S. J. Ebbens,Nat. Commun.2015,6, 8999
work page 2015
-
[45]
J. Simmchen, J. Katuri, W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, M. Tasinkevych, S. S´ anchez,Nat. Commun.2016,7, 10598
work page 2016
- [46]
- [47]
-
[48]
J. M. Chambers, C. L. Mallows, B. W. Stuck,J. Am. Stat. Assoc.1976,71, 340–344
work page 1976
- [49]
- [50]
- [51]
-
[52]
S. Umeyama,IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1991,13, 376–380
work page 1991
-
[53]
P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, ˙I. Polat, Y. Feng, E. W. Moore, J. VanderPlas, D. Laxalde, J. Perktold, R. Cimrman, I. Henriksen,...
-
[54]
A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, J. R. Buck,Discrete-time Signal Processing (2nd ed.)Prentice-Hall, Inc., USA,1999. 14 REFERENCES REFERENCES Supplementary Figures Figure S1: Time evolution of the living crystals in Fig. 1b-c atΩ 0 = 0k BT. Exemplary time evolutions of systems of run-and-tumble particles (colored-coded for their displacement speedv d as in ...
work page 1999
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.