pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16959 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CV

Hyperbolic Enhanced Representation Learning for Incomplete Multi-view Clustering

Tianyi Chen , Haobo Wang , Kai Tang , Gengyu Lyu , Tianlei Hu , Gang Chen , Hong Ma , Meixiang Xiang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 07:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CV
keywords incomplete multi-view clusteringhyperbolic geometryPoincaré ballcontrastive learningprototype alignmentsemantic disentanglementhierarchical representationrepresentation learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hyperbolic geometry in the Poincaré ball resolves semantic blurring in incomplete multi-view clustering by enforcing hierarchical and semantic constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that Euclidean spaces fail to model the intrinsic hierarchies in real-world multi-view data, causing representations to drift toward semantically incorrect neighbors. HERL addresses this by operating in hyperbolic space where a dual-constraint contrastive loss maintains semantic identity through angles and compactness through distances. A prototype head further aligns global structures across incomplete views. This leads to sharper cluster boundaries and better handling of missing data. If correct, it suggests a fundamental shift toward non-Euclidean geometries for clustering tasks involving hierarchical data.

Core claim

Operating within the Poincaré ball, HERL constructs a structure-aware latent space. It optimizes an angular-based loss to preserve semantic identity via directional alignment and a distance-based loss to enforce hierarchical compactness. A hyperbolic prototype head rectifies global structural drift by aligning cross-view hierarchy-aware prototype distributions, resulting in disentangled fine-grained semantic correlations and sharpened cluster boundaries.

What carries the argument

The hyperbolic dual-constraint contrastive mechanism combined with a prototype head in the Poincaré ball, which preserves directional semantics and hierarchical distances while aligning prototypes across views.

If this is right

  • Representations become more robust to missing views by imposing geometric constraints on data recovery.
  • Cluster boundaries sharpen as semantic correlations are disentangled from spatial proximity.
  • Global structural alignment reduces drift in latent spaces for incomplete observations.
  • Performance gains arise specifically from matching the geometry to data hierarchies rather than from additional parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hyperbolic methods could apply to other domains like graph clustering or recommendation systems where hierarchies are present.
  • Future work might explore combining this with imputation techniques for even better recovery of missing views.
  • Testing on synthetic hierarchical data would confirm if the assumption about intrinsic hierarchies holds.
  • The approach implies that many Euclidean-based clustering methods may have fundamental limitations on certain data types.

Load-bearing premise

Real-world data has intrinsic hierarchies that Euclidean geometry cannot capture without causing semantic blurring, and the proposed hyperbolic constraints fix this mismatch reliably.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment on datasets with known hierarchical structure where HERL is compared to its Euclidean counterpart, expecting clear performance degradation when hyperbolic components are removed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16959 by Gang Chen, Gengyu Lyu, Haobo Wang, Hong Ma, Kai Tang, Meixiang Xiang, Tianlei Hu, Tianyi Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of hierarchical structures in multi-view data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the HERL framework. (a) Euclidean Backbone establishes basic representations to capture cross-view [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Qualitative analysis on the HandWritten dataset. The top and bottom rows represent Euclidean-based method DIVIDE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis on Scene-15 (a) and HandWritten (b) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Incomplete Multi-View Clustering (IMVC) faces the challenge of learning discriminative representations from fragmentary observations while maintaining robustness against missing views. However, prevalent Euclidean-based methods suffer from a geometric mismatch when modeling real-world data with intrinsic hierarchies, leading to semantic blurring where representations drift towards spatially proximal but semantically distinct neighbors. To bridge this gap, we propose HERL, a Hyperbolic Enhanced Representation Learning framework for IMVC. Operating within the Poincar\'e ball, HERL constructs a structure-aware latent space to enhance representation learning. Specifically, we design a dual-constraint hyperbolic contrastive mechanism optimizing: an angular-based loss to preserve semantic identity via directional alignment, and a distance-based loss to enforce hierarchical compactness. Furthermore, a hyperbolic prototype head is introduced to rectify global structural drift by aligning cross-view hierarchy-aware prototype distributions. Consequently, HERL disentangles fine-grained semantic correlations to sharpen cluster boundaries and imposes geometric constraints to rectify the data recovery process. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that HERL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes HERL, a hyperbolic enhanced representation learning framework for incomplete multi-view clustering (IMVC). Operating in the Poincaré ball, it introduces a dual-constraint hyperbolic contrastive mechanism consisting of an angular-based loss to preserve semantic identity via directional alignment and a distance-based loss to enforce hierarchical compactness, along with a hyperbolic prototype head to align cross-view hierarchy-aware prototype distributions. The central claim is that this approach addresses geometric mismatches in Euclidean embeddings by disentangling fine-grained semantic correlations, sharpening cluster boundaries, and rectifying the data recovery process, leading to consistent outperformance over state-of-the-art IMVC methods.

Significance. If the results hold, the work offers a concrete geometric prior for IMVC by exploiting hyperbolic geometry's suitability for hierarchical data structures, with the dual losses and prototype head providing independent, testable components that go beyond standard contrastive setups. This could meaningfully advance representation learning for fragmentary multi-view data if the hierarchy assumption is validated. The manuscript does not include machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations, but the explicit design of the angular/distance losses and prototype alignment supplies a falsifiable mechanism worth further investigation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Method, dual-constraint mechanism): The central assumption that real-world IMVC data possesses intrinsic hierarchies causing semantic blurring in Euclidean space is load-bearing for the motivation, yet the manuscript provides no hierarchy diagnostic, distortion metric, or quantitative verification that the Poincaré-ball angular loss plus distance loss corrects blurring without introducing new mismatches or trade-offs in incomplete-view regimes.
  2. [§4] §4 (Experiments): The reported outperformance over SOTA baselines is presented without controlled ablations that isolate the geometric contribution of the hyperbolic prototype head and dual-constraint losses from capacity increases or hyperparameter tuning effects; this leaves open whether the gains stem from the claimed geometric rectification or other factors.
  3. [§3.2] §3.2 (Hyperbolic prototype head): The claim that the prototype head rectifies global structural drift by aligning cross-view hierarchy-aware distributions lacks supporting analysis showing it suppresses rather than propagates missing-view errors, which is a key risk in IMVC settings and directly affects the data-recovery rectification argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and method sections would benefit from explicit statements of the datasets, number of views, missing rates, and evaluation metrics used in the experiments to allow direct reproducibility assessment.
  2. [§3] Notation for the Poincaré ball curvature parameter and the precise formulation of the angular versus distance loss terms could be clarified with an equation reference to avoid ambiguity in the dual-constraint description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Method, dual-constraint mechanism): The central assumption that real-world IMVC data possesses intrinsic hierarchies causing semantic blurring in Euclidean space is load-bearing for the motivation, yet the manuscript provides no hierarchy diagnostic, distortion metric, or quantitative verification that the Poincaré-ball angular loss plus distance loss corrects blurring without introducing new mismatches or trade-offs in incomplete-view regimes.

    Authors: We agree that empirical verification of the hierarchy assumption would strengthen the motivation. Although the suitability of hyperbolic geometry for hierarchical structures is well-established in the literature, we will add a new subsection in §3 with quantitative diagnostics, including distortion metrics on the datasets and comparisons of semantic blurring in Euclidean versus hyperbolic spaces. This will also address potential trade-offs in incomplete-view settings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Experiments): The reported outperformance over SOTA baselines is presented without controlled ablations that isolate the geometric contribution of the hyperbolic prototype head and dual-constraint losses from capacity increases or hyperparameter tuning effects; this leaves open whether the gains stem from the claimed geometric rectification or other factors.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for isolating the geometric contributions. In the revised version, we will include additional ablation experiments that control for model capacity and hyperparameters, comparing the full HERL model against variants without the dual-constraint losses and without the prototype head. These will demonstrate the specific benefits of the hyperbolic components. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Hyperbolic prototype head): The claim that the prototype head rectifies global structural drift by aligning cross-view hierarchy-aware distributions lacks supporting analysis showing it suppresses rather than propagates missing-view errors, which is a key risk in IMVC settings and directly affects the data-recovery rectification argument.

    Authors: We appreciate this point regarding the risk of error propagation in IMVC. We will enhance §3.2 with additional analysis, including experiments that measure the effect of the prototype head on missing-view error rates and visualizations of cross-view alignment to show suppression of structural drift rather than propagation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces an independent hyperbolic framework (Poincaré ball with angular/distance losses plus prototype head) whose claimed benefits are presented as direct consequences of the new geometric components rather than reductions of fitted inputs or prior self-citations. No equations or steps reduce by construction to the inputs; the derivation chain adds novel constraints without self-definitional loops, fitted predictions renamed as results, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' own prior work. The central claims rest on the proposed mechanisms' ability to address semantic blurring, which is an external modeling assumption rather than a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that Euclidean geometry mismatches hierarchical data and on the effectiveness of newly introduced hyperbolic components; free parameters likely exist in loss balancing but are unspecified.

free parameters (1)
  • Contrastive loss temperatures or balancing weights
    Standard in contrastive objectives and required to optimize the dual constraints, though not detailed in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Real-world data has intrinsic hierarchies that Euclidean geometry cannot model without semantic blurring.
    Directly invoked in the abstract to justify switching to hyperbolic space.
invented entities (1)
  • Hyperbolic prototype head no independent evidence
    purpose: Rectify global structural drift by aligning cross-view hierarchy-aware prototype distributions.
    New component introduced without independent evidence outside the framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1198 out tokens · 56881 ms · 2026-05-10T07:08:24.659389+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mixture of experts as representation learner for deep multi-view clustering,

    Y . Zhang, J. Cai, Z. Wu, P. Wang, and S. Ng, “Mixture of experts as representation learner for deep multi-view clustering,” inAAAI, 2025, pp. 22 704–22 713

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Late fusion incomplete multi-view clustering,

    X. Liu, X. Zhu, M. Li, L. Wang, C. Tang, J. Yin, D. Shen, H. Wang, and W. Gao, “Late fusion incomplete multi-view clustering,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., pp. 2410–2423, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Sample-level cross-view similarity learning for incomplete multi-view clustering,

    S. Liu, J. Zhang, Y . Wen, X. Yang, S. Wang, Y . Zhang, E. Zhu, C. Tang, L. Zhao, and X. Liu, “Sample-level cross-view similarity learning for incomplete multi-view clustering,” inAAAI, 2024, pp. 14 017–14 025

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Bifurcate then alienate: Incomplete multi-view clustering via coupled distribution learning with linear overhead,

    S. Yu, Y . Cheung, S. Wang, X. Liu, and E. Zhu, “Bifurcate then alienate: Incomplete multi-view clustering via coupled distribution learning with linear overhead,” inICML, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Localized sparse incomplete multi-view clustering,

    C. Liu, Z. Wu, J. Wen, Y . Xu, and C. Huang, “Localized sparse incomplete multi-view clustering,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 5539–5551, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Manifold-based incomplete multi-view clustering via bi-consistency guidance,

    H. Wang, M. Yao, Y . Chen, Y . Xu, H. Liu, W. Jia, X. Fu, and Y . Wang, “Manifold-based incomplete multi-view clustering via bi-consistency guidance,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 10 001– 10 014, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Robust multi- view clustering with incomplete information,

    M. Yang, Y . Li, P. Hu, J. Bai, J. Lv, and X. Peng, “Robust multi- view clustering with incomplete information,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., pp. 1055–1069, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Decoupled contrastive multi-view clustering with high-order random walks,

    Y . Lu, Y . Lin, M. Yang, D. Peng, P. Hu, and X. Peng, “Decoupled contrastive multi-view clustering with high-order random walks,” in AAAI, 2024, pp. 14 193–14 201

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Learning to discriminate while contrasting: Combating false negative pairs with coupled contrastive learning for incomplete multi-view clustering,

    Y . Ding, K. Hotta, C. Gu, A. Li, J. Yu, and C. Zhang, “Learning to discriminate while contrasting: Combating false negative pairs with coupled contrastive learning for incomplete multi-view clustering,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., pp. 6046–6060, 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Deep incomplete multi- view clustering with cross-view partial sample and prototype alignment,

    J. Jin, S. Wang, Z. Dong, X. Liu, and E. Zhu, “Deep incomplete multi- view clustering with cross-view partial sample and prototype alignment,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 11 600–11 609

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Incomplete multi- view clustering via prototype-based imputation,

    H. Li, Y . Li, M. Yang, P. Hu, D. Peng, and X. Peng, “Incomplete multi- view clustering via prototype-based imputation,” inIJCAI, 2023, pp. 3911–3919

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Imputation-free incomplete multi- view clustering via knowledge distillation,

    B. Wu, W. Du, J. Wang, and G. Yu, “Imputation-free incomplete multi- view clustering via knowledge distillation,” inIJCAI, 2025, pp. 6570– 6578

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    COMPLETER: incomplete multi-view clustering via contrastive prediction,

    Y . Lin, Y . Gou, Z. Liu, B. Li, J. Lv, and X. Peng, “COMPLETER: incomplete multi-view clustering via contrastive prediction,” inCVPR, 2021, pp. 11 174–11 183

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Dual contrastive prediction for incomplete multi-view representation learning,

    Y . Lin, Y . Gou, X. Liu, J. Bai, J. Lv, and X. Peng, “Dual contrastive prediction for incomplete multi-view representation learning,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., pp. 4447–4461, 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Deep incomplete multi-view learning via cyclic permutation of vaes,

    X. Gao and J. Pu, “Deep incomplete multi-view learning via cyclic permutation of vaes,” inICLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Incomplete contrastive multi-view clustering with high-confidence guiding,

    G. Chao, Y . Jiang, and D. Chu, “Incomplete contrastive multi-view clustering with high-confidence guiding,” inAAAI, 2024, pp. 11 221– 11 229

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Poincar ´e embeddings for learning hierarchical representations,

    M. Nickel and D. Kiela, “Poincar ´e embeddings for learning hierarchical representations,” inNeurIPS, 2017, pp. 6338–6347

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Hyperbolic neural networks,

    O. Ganea, G. B ´ecigneul, and T. Hofmann, “Hyperbolic neural networks,” inNeurIPS, 2018, pp. 5350–5360

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Hyperbolic image embeddings,

    V . Khrulkov, L. Mirvakhabova, E. Ustinova, I. V . Oseledets, and V . S. Lempitsky, “Hyperbolic image embeddings,” inCVPR, 2020, pp. 6417– 6427

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Hyperbolic vision transformers: Combining improvements in metric learning,

    A. Ermolov, L. Mirvakhabova, V . Khrulkov, N. Sebe, and I. V . Oseledets, “Hyperbolic vision transformers: Combining improvements in metric learning,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 7399–7409

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Hyperbolic contrastive learning for visual representations beyond objects,

    S. Ge, S. Mishra, S. Kornblith, C. Li, and D. Jacobs, “Hyperbolic contrastive learning for visual representations beyond objects,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 6840–6849

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Hyperbolic image segmentation,

    M. G. Atigh, J. Schoep, E. Acar, N. van Noord, and P. Mettes, “Hyperbolic image segmentation,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 4443–4452

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Hyperbolic self- paced learning for self-supervised skeleton-based action representa- tions,

    L. Franco, P. Mandica, B. Munjal, and F. Galasso, “Hyperbolic self- paced learning for self-supervised skeleton-based action representa- tions,” inICLR, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Beyond euclidean: Dual-space representation learning for weakly supervised video violence detection,

    J. Leng, Z. Wu, M. Tan, Y . Liu, J. Gan, H. Chen, and X. Gao, “Beyond euclidean: Dual-space representation learning for weakly supervised video violence detection,” inNeurIPS, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Hyperbolic category discovery,

    Y . Liu, Z. He, and K. Han, “Hyperbolic category discovery,” inCVPR, 2025, pp. 9891–9900

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    MHCN: A hyperbolic neural network model for multi-view hierarchical clustering,

    F. Lin, B. Bai, Y . Guo, H. Chen, Y . Ren, and Z. Xu, “MHCN: A hyperbolic neural network model for multi-view hierarchical clustering,” inof ICCV, 2023, pp. 16 479–16 489

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Contrastive multi- view hyperbolic hierarchical clustering,

    F. Lin, B. Bai, K. Bai, Y . Ren, P. Zhao, and Z. Xu, “Contrastive multi- view hyperbolic hierarchical clustering,” inof IJCAI, 2022, pp. 3250– 3256

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Gradient-based hierarchical clustering using continuous representations of trees in hyperbolic space,

    N. Monath, M. Zaheer, D. Silva, A. McCallum, and A. Ahmed, “Gradient-based hierarchical clustering using continuous representations of trees in hyperbolic space,” inKDD, 2019, pp. 714–722

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Clipped hyperbolic classifiers are super-hyperbolic classifiers,

    Y . Guo, X. Wang, Y . Chen, and S. X. Yu, “Clipped hyperbolic classifiers are super-hyperbolic classifiers,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 1–10

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Low distortion delaunay embedding of trees in hyperbolic plane,

    R. Sarkar, “Low distortion delaunay embedding of trees in hyperbolic plane,” inGraph Drawing, 2011, pp. 355–366

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    A bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories,

    L. Fei-Fei and P. Perona, “A bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories,” inCVPR, 2005, pp. 524–531

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Learning from multiple partially observed views - an application to multilingual text categorization,

    M. Amini, N. Usunier, and C. Goutte, “Learning from multiple partially observed views - an application to multilingual text categorization,” in NeurIPS, 2009, pp. 28–36

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Bag-of-visual-words and spatial extensions for land-use classification,

    Y . Yang and S. Newsam, “Bag-of-visual-words and spatial extensions for land-use classification,” inACM SIGSPATIAL Int. Conf. Adv. Inf., 2010, pp. 270–279

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Uci machine learning repository,

    A. Asuncion and D. Newman, “Uci machine learning repository,” 2007

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Deep safe incomplete multi-view clustering: Theorem and algorithm,

    H. Tang and Y . Liu, “Deep safe incomplete multi-view clustering: Theorem and algorithm,” inICML, 2022, pp. 21 090–21 110

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Deep incomplete multi-view clustering via mining cluster complementarity,

    J. Xu, C. Li, Y . Ren, L. Peng, Y . Mo, X. Shi, and X. Zhu, “Deep incomplete multi-view clustering via mining cluster complementarity,” inAAAI, 2022, pp. 8761–8769

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Incomplete multi-view clustering via diffusion contrastive generation,

    Y . Zhang, Y . Lin, W. Yan, L. Yao, X. Wan, G. Li, C. Zhang, G. Ke, and J. Xu, “Incomplete multi-view clustering via diffusion contrastive generation,” inAAAI, 2025, pp. 22 650–22 658

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” inICLR, 2015

    work page 2015