pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17700 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

Dynamical spin-nematic order in a transverse field Ising chain with non-Hermitian Gamma interaction

Yu-Hong Yan , Ran Wang , Kun-Liang Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords non-Hermitian Ising chainspin-nematic orderPT symmetry breakingtransverse field Ising modelgapless phasedynamical spin orderquantum phase diagram
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Hermitian Gamma interaction in the transverse-field Ising chain creates a gapless phase with long-range spin-nematic order by breaking parity-time symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors study the transverse-field Ising chain after adding a non-Hermitian Gamma interaction term. Besides the familiar gapped ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases, they identify a gapless region in which spin correlations develop long-range nematic order. This order appears only when parity-time symmetry is broken by the non-Hermitian term. The same symmetry breaking produces time-dependent signatures of the nematic order, offering a dynamical route to map the phase boundaries.

Core claim

Apart from the gapped ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases, there is a gapless phase where the system exhibits long-range spin-nematic order induced by parity-time symmetry breaking. The parity-time symmetry breaking also leads to the emergence of dynamical spin-nematic order, which provides a way of characterizing the spin-nematic phase diagram through non-equilibrium dynamics.

What carries the argument

The non-Hermitian Gamma interaction, which competes with the Ising coupling and transverse field to break PT symmetry and generate quadrupolar spin correlations without net magnetization.

If this is right

  • Rich quantum phases arise from the competition among Ising interaction, transverse field, and non-Hermitian Gamma interaction.
  • Parity-time symmetry breaking supplies a mechanism for generating spin-nematic order in one-dimensional spin chains.
  • Non-equilibrium dynamics can be used to locate the boundaries of the spin-nematic phase without relying solely on static correlation functions.
  • The gapless phase supports long-range nematic order that is absent in the gapped ferromagnetic and paramagnetic regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineered open quantum systems or dissipative lattices could realize the required Gamma term and allow direct observation of the dynamical nematic signatures.
  • The same PT-breaking route might produce analogous hidden orders in other low-dimensional models where conventional magnetic order is suppressed.
  • Time-resolved probes of correlation growth could become a general diagnostic for identifying PT-induced phases in non-Hermitian quantum magnets.

Load-bearing premise

The non-Hermitian Gamma term can be introduced while keeping PT symmetry intact and without extra dissipation that would suppress the long-range nematic order or its dynamical signatures.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation that finds no power-law decay in the nematic correlation function or no gapless spectrum in the parameter region claimed to host the PT-broken phase would falsify the reported gapless spin-nematic phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17700 by Kun-Liang Zhang, Ran Wang, Yu-Hong Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left panel is the phase diagram characterized by the energy gap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase diagram characterized by the spin-nematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)-(f) Time evolutions of spin-nematic correlations as a function of distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase diagram obtained from the time average spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effect of non-Hermitian Gamma interaction on the phase transitions and magnetic correlations for the transverse field Ising chain. We demonstrate that apart from the gapped ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases, there is a gapless phase, where the system exhibits long-range spin-nematic order induced by parity-time symmetry breaking. Furthermore, we reveal that the parity-time symmetry breaking leads to the emergence of dynamical spin-nematic order, which also suggests a way of characterizing the spin-nematic phase diagram through non-equilibrium dynamics. Our findings show rich quantum phases stem from the competition among the Ising interaction, transverse field and non-Hermitian Gamma interaction, as well as providing a scheme for generating spin-nematic order in the spin chain.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the transverse-field Ising chain with an added non-Hermitian Gamma interaction. It reports three phases: gapped ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases, plus a gapless phase featuring long-range spin-nematic order that is induced by parity-time (PT) symmetry breaking. The work further claims that PT symmetry breaking produces dynamical spin-nematic order, which can be used to characterize the spin-nematic phase diagram via non-equilibrium dynamics. The central narrative emphasizes the competition among Ising coupling, transverse field, and the non-Hermitian term as the origin of these rich phases.

Significance. If the numerical and analytical evidence is robust, the results would establish a concrete route to realizing and detecting spin-nematic order in a one-dimensional spin chain through engineered non-Hermitian interactions and PT symmetry. The proposed dynamical characterization of the phase diagram via non-equilibrium evolution is a potentially useful diagnostic that links static order to time-dependent signatures. The work also supplies an explicit example of how a non-Hermitian perturbation can stabilize a gapless phase with long-range order that is absent in the Hermitian limit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introductory sections provide no information on the numerical or analytical methods, finite system sizes, boundary conditions, or convergence/error controls employed to identify the gapless phase and to confirm long-range spin-nematic order. These details are load-bearing for the central claim that PT symmetry breaking induces the reported order.
  2. [Model Hamiltonian (presumably §2)] The construction of the non-Hermitian Gamma term and the explicit verification that PT symmetry remains well-defined (and is broken only in the claimed regime) are not detailed. Without this, it is unclear whether the Gamma interaction introduces unaccounted dissipation that could alter the reported long-range order or dynamical signatures.
  3. [Results on spin-nematic order (presumably §3 or §4)] The evidence for long-range spin-nematic order in the gapless phase relies on correlation functions or order parameters whose finite-size behavior, scaling, or extrapolation is not described. This weakens the assertion that the order is truly long-range rather than a finite-size artifact.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Notation for the Gamma interaction strength and the PT operator should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional redefinitions make the symmetry-breaking discussion harder to follow.
  2. [Figures on dynamics] Figure captions and axis labels for the dynamical quantities (e.g., time-dependent nematic correlations) could be expanded to indicate the initial state and the precise observable being plotted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity and rigor of our presentation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introductory sections provide no information on the numerical or analytical methods, finite system sizes, boundary conditions, or convergence/error controls employed to identify the gapless phase and to confirm long-range spin-nematic order. These details are load-bearing for the central claim that PT symmetry breaking induces the reported order.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and introduction should explicitly outline the methods to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript, we will add a paragraph in the introduction describing the use of exact diagonalization on finite chains, the system sizes considered (up to N=20), open boundary conditions, and convergence checks via gap closing and correlation saturation with increasing N. This will better substantiate the identification of the gapless phase and long-range order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model Hamiltonian (presumably §2)] The construction of the non-Hermitian Gamma term and the explicit verification that PT symmetry remains well-defined (and is broken only in the claimed regime) are not detailed. Without this, it is unclear whether the Gamma interaction introduces unaccounted dissipation that could alter the reported long-range order or dynamical signatures.

    Authors: The non-Hermitian Gamma term is constructed to be compatible with PT symmetry. We will expand Section 2 to give the explicit form of the term, define the PT operator (parity as site inversion combined with time-reversal as complex conjugation), and show that the Hamiltonian commutes with PT in the unbroken regime (yielding real eigenvalues) while PT is broken in the gapless phase (complex eigenvalues). We will also clarify that the non-Hermiticity is balanced such that it does not introduce net dissipation affecting the order in the PT-unbroken regime. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results on spin-nematic order (presumably §3 or §4)] The evidence for long-range spin-nematic order in the gapless phase relies on correlation functions or order parameters whose finite-size behavior, scaling, or extrapolation is not described. This weakens the assertion that the order is truly long-range rather than a finite-size artifact.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the finite-size analysis of the spin-nematic correlations was not described in sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript, we will add discussion and supporting data on the system-size dependence of the nematic correlation functions, showing that they saturate to a nonzero value with increasing N in the gapless phase (consistent with long-range order) while decaying in the gapped phases. A brief note on extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit will also be included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper constructs a non-Hermitian extension of the transverse-field Ising chain and analyzes its phases and correlations directly from the Hamiltonian. The gapless phase with long-range spin-nematic order is presented as emerging from PT-symmetry breaking, and the dynamical signatures are obtained via time evolution of the same model. No quoted steps reduce a claimed prediction or first-principles result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the derivation chain remains independent of the target observables once the Hamiltonian is specified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model is built on the standard transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian plus one new non-Hermitian term; no additional free parameters beyond the usual couplings and the Gamma strength are introduced, and no new particles or dimensions are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Gamma interaction strength
    Treated as a tunable parameter to map the phase diagram; not fitted to external data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system is a one-dimensional chain with nearest-neighbor Ising interactions and a uniform transverse field.
    Standard setup for the transverse-field Ising model invoked throughout the abstract.
  • domain assumption Parity-time symmetry can be defined and broken in the non-Hermitian extension.
    Central to the claimed mechanism for the gapless phase.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5425 in / 1460 out tokens · 52173 ms · 2026-05-10T04:42:45.536973+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a trans- verse field, Ann

    P. Pfeuty, The one-dimensional Ising model with a trans- verse field, Ann. Phys.57, 79 (1970)

    work page 1970

  3. [3]

    Coldea, D

    R. Coldea, D. Tennant, E. Wheeler, E. Wawrzynska, D. Prabhakaran, M. Telling, K. Habicht, P. Smeibidl, and K. Kiefer, Quantum Criticality in an Ising Chain: Experimental Evidence for EmergentE 8 Symmetry, Sci- ence327, 177 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin Heisenberg Antiferromagnets: Semiclassically Quantized Solitons of the One-Dimensional Easy-Axis N´ eel State, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1153 (1983)

    work page 1983

  5. [5]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rig- orous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 799 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Os- hikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B85, 075125 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B83, 035107 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Tennant, R

    D. Tennant, R. Cowley, S. Nagler, and A. Tsvelik, Measurement of the spin-excitation continuum in one- dimensional kcuf 3 using neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 4003 (1993)

    work page 1993

  9. [9]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Mourigal, M

    M. Mourigal, M. Enderle, A. Kl¨ opperpieper, J.-S. Caux, A. Stunault, and H. M. Rønnow, Fractional spinon ex- citations in the quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain, Nat. Phys.9, 435 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009)

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Generic Spin Model for the Honeycomb Iridates beyond the Kitaev Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 077204 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valent´ ı, Mod- els and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism, J. Phys.:Condens. Matter29, 493002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    W. Yang, A. Nocera, E. S. Sørensen, H.-Y. Kee, and I. Affleck, Classical spin order near the antiferromagnetic Kitaev point in the spin-1/2 Kitaev-Gamma chain, Phys. Rev. B103, 054437 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    M. O. Takahashi, M. G. Yamada, D. Takikawa, T. Mizushima, and S. Fujimoto, Topological nematic phase transition in Kitaev magnets under applied mag- netic fields, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023189 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Q. Luo, S. Hu, J. Li, J. Zhao, H.-Y. Kee, and X. Wang, Spontaneous dimerization, spin-nematic order, and de- confined quantum critical point in a spin-1 Kitaev chain with tunable single-ion anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B107, 245131 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Andreev and I

    A. Andreev and I. Grishchuk, Spin nematics, Sov. Phys. JETP60, 267 (1984)

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    Penc and A

    K. Penc and A. M. L¨ auchli, Spin Nematic Phases in Quantum Spin Systems, inIntroduction to frustrated magnetism: materials, experiments, theory(Springer,

    work page

  19. [19]

    X. Lu, J. Park, R. Zhang, H. Luo, A. H. Nevidomskyy, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Nematic spin correlations in the tetrag- onal state of uniaxial-strainedBaF e 2−xN ixAs2, Science 345, 657 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Gohlke, G

    M. Gohlke, G. Wachtel, Y. Yamaji, F. Pollmann, and Y. B. Kim, Quantum spin liquid signatures in Kitaev- like frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B97, 075126 (2018). 9

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    E. S. Sørensen, A. Catuneanu, J. S. Gordon, and H.- Y. Kee, Heart of Entanglement: Chiral, Nematic, and Incommensurate Phases in the Kitaev-Gamma Ladder in a Field, Phys. Rev. X11, 011013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Zvyagin and V

    A. Zvyagin and V. Slavin, Spin nematic ordering in the spin-1 chain system, Phys. Rev. B106, 054429 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Zvyagin, V

    A. Zvyagin, V. Slavin, and G. Zvyagina, Manifestation of spin nematic ordering in the spin-1 chain system, Phys. Rev. B107, 134421 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Q. Luo, J. Zhao, J. Li, and X. Wang, Chiral spin state and nematic ferromagnet in the spin-1 Kitaev-Γ model, Phys. Rev. B110, 035121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Zvyagin and V

    A. Zvyagin and V. Slavin, Intersite spin nematic ordering in the spin-1/2 chain system, Phys. Rev. B109, 104409 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Abbasi, S

    M. Abbasi, S. Mahdavifar, and M. Motamedifar, Spin- 1/2 XX chains with modulated gamma interaction, Sci- Post Phys. Core8, 001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Zvyagin, V

    A. Zvyagin, V. Slavin, G. Zvyagina, and V. Piryatin- skaya, Intersite spin nematic ordering in spin chain mate- rials: Behavior of observables, Phys. Rev. B111, 104415 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Dai, S.-H

    Y.-W. Dai, S.-H. Li, S. Y. Cho, and H.-Q. Zhou, Phase di- agram and spin nematic phase transitions in biquadratic spin-1 and spin-2 XY chains with single-ion anisotropies, Phys. A , 131330 (2026)

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    W. Yang, A. Nocera, T. Tummuru, H.-Y. Kee, and I. Af- fleck, Phase Diagram of the Spin-1/2 Kitaev-Gamma Chain and Emergent SU(2) Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 147205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Huang, W.-L

    R.-D. Huang, W.-L. Li, and Z. Li, Tunable chiral spi- ral phases in a non-Hermitian Ising-Gamma spin chain, Phys. Rev. A113, 012203 (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Turkeshi and M

    X. Turkeshi and M. Schir´ o, Entanglement and correlation spreading in non-Hermitian spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 107, L020403 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional Invisibility In- duced byPT-Symmetric Periodic Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 213901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Jin and Z

    L. Jin and Z. Song, Incident Direction Independent Wave Propagation and Unidirectional Lasing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 073901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Thomas, H. Rost, T. Oja- nen, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Sci- ence368, 311 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Jin and Z

    L. Jin and Z. Song, Symmetry-Protected Scattering in Non-Hermitian Linear Systems, Chin. Phys. Lett.38, 024202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Wu and J.-H

    H. Wu and J.-H. An, Floquet topological phases of non- Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B102, 041119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Wu and L

    H. Wu and L. Jin, Topological zero modes from the inter- play of pt symmetry and anti-pt symmetry, Phys. Rev. B112, 125146 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking, Sci- ence346, 972 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time– symmetric microring lasers, Science346, 975 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological insulator laser: Experiments, Science359, eaar4005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nat. Phys.5, 633 (2009)

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nat. Phys.15, 1232 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    T. E. Lee and C.-K. Chan, Heralded Magnetism in Non- Hermitian Atomic Systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 041001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    C. Li, G. Zhang, and Z. Song, Chern number in Ising models with spatially modulated real and complex fields, Phys. Rev. A94, 052113 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Zhang, L

    X. Zhang, L. Jin, and Z. Song, Dynamic magnetization in non-Hermitian quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 101, 224301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    K. L. Zhang and Z. Song, Ising chain with topological degeneracy induced by dissipation, Phys. Rev. B101, 245152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Y.-G. Liu, L. Xu, and Z. Li, Quantum phase transition in a non-Hermitian XY spin chain with global complex transverse field, J. Phys.:Condens. Matter33, 295401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    K. L. Zhang and Z. Song, Quantum Phase Transition in a Quantum Ising Chain at Nonzero Temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 116401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Lenke, M

    L. Lenke, M. M¨ uhlhauser, and K. P. Schmidt, High-order series expansion of non-Hermitian quantum spin models, Phys. Rev. B104, 195137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Matsumoto, M

    N. Matsumoto, M. Nakagawa, and M. Ueda, Embedding the Yang-Lee quantum criticality in open quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033250 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Guo, X.-J

    Z.-X. Guo, X.-J. Yu, X.-D. Hu, and Z. Li, Emergent phase transitions in a cluster Ising model with dissipa- tion, Phys. Rev. A105, 053311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Sun, J.-C

    G. Sun, J.-C. Tang, and S.-P. Kou, Biorthogonal quan- tum criticality in non-Hermitian many-body systems, Front. Phys.17, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Lenke, A

    L. Lenke, A. Schellenberger, and K. P. Schmidt, Series expansions in closed and open quantum many-body sys- tems with multiple quasiparticle types, Phys. Rev. A 108, 013323 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    K. L. Zhang and Z. Song, Magnetic Bloch oscillations in a non-Hermitian quantum Ising chain, Phys. Rev. B109, 104312 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Zhang, Magnetization in a nonequilibrium quantum spin system, Phys

    X. Zhang, Magnetization in a nonequilibrium quantum spin system, Phys. Rev. B109, 184314 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Partanen, J

    M. Partanen, J. Goetz, K. Y. Tan, K. Kohvakka, V. Sevriuk, R. E. Lake, R. Kokkoniemi, J. Ikonen, D. Hazra, A. M¨ akinen, E. Hyypp¨ a, L. Gr¨ onberg, V. Vesterinen, M. Silveri, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Exceptional points in tunable superconducting resonators, Phys. Rev. B100, 134505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Y. Wu, W. Liu, J. Geng, X. Song, X. Ye, C.-K. Duan, X. Rong, and J. Du, Observation of parity-time symme- try breaking in a single-spin system, Science364, 878 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. de Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, and L. Luo, Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking 10 transitions in a dissipative Floquet system of ultracold atoms, Nat. Commun.10, 855 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Zhang, X

    W. Zhang, X. Ouyang, X. Huang, X. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, X. Chang, Y. Liu, D.-L. Deng, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of Non-Hermitian Topology with Nonuni- tary Dynamics of Solid-State Spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 090501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Z. Ren, D. Liu, E. Zhao, C. He, K. K. Pak, J. Li, and G.- B. Jo, Chiral control of quantum states in non-Hermitian spin–orbit-coupled fermions, Nat. Phys.18, 385 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    H. Gao, K. Wang, L. Xiao, M. Nakagawa, N. Matsumoto, D. Qu, H. Lin, M. Ueda, and P. Xue, Experimental Ob- servation of the Yang-Lee Quantum Criticality in Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo and A. Fring, A spin chain model with non-Hermitian interaction: the Ising quantum spin chain in an imaginary field, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.42, 465211 (2009)

    work page 2009

  66. [66]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non- Hermitian Hamiltonians HavingPTSymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    work page 1998

  67. [67]

    Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT symme- try: The necessary condition for the reality of the spec- trum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT symme- try: The necessary condition for the reality of the spec- trum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 43, 205 (2002)

    work page 2002

  68. [68]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, ¨Uber das Paulische ¨ aquivalenzverbot, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik47, 631 (1928)

    work page 1928

  69. [69]

    Wick, The Evaluation of the Collision Matrix, Phys

    G.-C. Wick, The Evaluation of the Collision Matrix, Phys. Rev.80, 268 (1950)

    work page 1950

  70. [70]

    Barouch and B

    E. Barouch and B. M. McCoy, Statistical Mechanics of the XY Model. II. Spin-Correlation Functions, Phys. Rev. A3, 786 (1971)

    work page 1971

  71. [71]

    Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, L

    C. Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, L. M. Robledo, and G. F. Bertsch, Numeric and symbolic evaluation of the pfaf- fian of general skew-symmetric matrices, Comput. Phys. Commun.182, 2213 (2011)

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    Wimmer, Algorithm 923: Efficient Numerical Com- putation of the Pfaffian for Dense and Banded Skew- Symmetric Matrices, ACM Trans

    M. Wimmer, Algorithm 923: Efficient Numerical Com- putation of the Pfaffian for Dense and Banded Skew- Symmetric Matrices, ACM Trans. Math. Softw.38, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    F. D. M. Haldane, ‘Luttinger liquid theory’ of one- dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Lut- tinger model and their extension to the general 1D inter- acting spinless Fermi gas, J. Phys. C:Solid State Phys. 14, 2585 (1981)

    work page 1981