pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19385 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.supr-con

Josephson diode effect in multichannel Rashba nanowires: Role of inter-subband coupling

Ardamon Sten , Sudeep Kumar Ghosh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Josephson diode effectRashba nanowiresinter-subband couplingMajorana bound statestopological superconductivitymultichannel nanowiresnonreciprocal supercurrent
0
0 comments X

The pith

Inter-subband coupling confines topological phases to finite Zeeman windows in Rashba nanowire diodes

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the Josephson diode effect in junctions based on multichannel Rashba nanowires. It shows that coupling between different subbands alters the topological phase diagram relative to single-channel models by restricting the topological regime to a limited interval of Zeeman field values. Inside that interval Majorana bound states appear and raise the diode efficiency. The same coupling produces a nonzero diode effect when the Zeeman field lies parallel to the spin-orbit direction, which does not occur in single-channel or independent-channel treatments. Realistic nanowire devices are multichannel, so the findings indicate how transverse confinement can be used to improve nonreciprocal supercurrent behavior.

Core claim

Subband hybridization qualitatively modifies both the topological phase diagram and the JDE response of the device. In contrast to the single-channel case, the topological phase is confined to a finite window of Zeeman fields, within which Majorana bound states strongly enhance the diode efficiency. Inter-subband coupling also enables a finite JDE even when the Zeeman field is aligned along the spin-orbit direction -- a mechanism absent in independent-channel and strictly one-dimensional nanowire systems. Furthermore, inter-subband coupling enhances spectral asymmetry and significantly increases the diode efficiency compared to single-channel junctions.

What carries the argument

Inter-subband coupling arising from transverse confinement in the multichannel Rashba nanowire Hamiltonian, which hybridizes subbands and thereby reshapes the topological phase boundaries and the directionality of the supercurrent.

If this is right

  • Topological phases hosting Majorana bound states exist only inside a bounded interval of Zeeman field strengths.
  • Diode efficiency reaches higher values inside that interval because of the Majorana states.
  • A finite diode effect occurs for Zeeman fields aligned with the Rashba spin-orbit direction.
  • Diode efficiency exceeds the values obtained in single-channel nanowire junctions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Varying nanowire width or gate-defined confinement could tune the strength of inter-subband coupling to widen the useful Zeeman window.
  • The same hybridization mechanism may influence nonreciprocal transport in other multi-mode hybrid superconductor-semiconductor platforms.
  • Orientation-dependent measurements of the diode response could serve as a diagnostic for the number of occupied subbands in experimental devices.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes a specific form and strength of inter-subband coupling and Rashba spin-orbit interaction whose quantitative dependence on transverse confinement is taken as given.

What would settle it

Measurement of diode efficiency versus Zeeman field strength and orientation in a fabricated multichannel Rashba nanowire junction, checking whether efficiency drops to zero outside a finite field window and remains finite for parallel alignment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19385 by Ardamon Sten, Sudeep Kumar Ghosh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) shows the CPR in the trivial phase (B = 0.5 meV) for the three distinct values of θ. At θ = 0, the CPR is symmetric about ϕ = π and exhibits a sharp drop in the current magnitude without changing sign at the zero￾crossings of the ABS. The absence of a sign change at the ABS crossings shows the finite contribution of the con￾tinuum levels in addition to the ABS. For θ ̸= 0, the weak asymmetry in the spe… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) shows the efficiency as a function of the Zee￾man field for the interacting channels. Because of the low chemical potential (µ = −0.5 meV) required to reach the helical regime of the first subband, the Fermi level lies in the vacuum below the subbands for lower values of the Zeeman field. Therefore, the lower values of the Zeeman energy do not exhibit any JDE and η starts taking a fi￾nite value when th… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (c) exhibits thermal smearing and reduced criti￾cal currents with temperature and the asymmetric CPR for θ = π/12 in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (c) and features zig-zag patterns due to the triv￾ial crossings of the first two subbands and a kink-like behavior at the crossing corresponding to the MBS. We also notice that for the interacting channels, the critical currents asymmetry is reduced when multiple subbbands are occupied. This indicates that the overall efficiency is less as compared to the case when one spinful subband is occupied. Indeed … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: , we present the energy-momentum dispersion of the multichannel Rashba nanowire in the case of inter￾acting (δc ̸= 0) and independent (δc = 0) channels when the external Zeeman field lies wholly along the SOC-axis by setting θ = π/2. For the interacting channels, the spectrum exhibits an asymmetry about kx = 0 leading to the formation of finite-momentum Cooper pairs which is crucial for observing diode ef… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Josephson diode effect (JDE) has attracted significant attention for enabling directional, dissipationless supercurrents, positioning Josephson junctions as promising building blocks for next-generation quantum devices. Hybrid semiconductor-superconductor nanowires provide an experimentally accessible platform for realizing the JDE and hosting Majorana bound states. However, most theoretical treatments assume the single-channel limit, whereas realistic nanowire devices are inherently multichannel due to transverse confinement. Here, we investigate the JDE in multichannel Rashba nanowire Josephson junctions, focusing on the role of inter-subband coupling. We show that subband hybridization qualitatively modifies both the topological phase diagram and the JDE response of the device. In contrast to the single-channel case, the topological phase is confined to a finite window of Zeeman fields, within which Majorana bound states strongly enhance the diode efficiency. Inter-subband coupling also enables a finite JDE even when the Zeeman field is aligned along the spin-orbit direction -- a mechanism absent in independent-channel and strictly one-dimensional nanowire systems. Furthermore, inter-subband coupling enhances spectral asymmetry and significantly increases the diode efficiency compared to single-channel junctions. These results identify inter-subband hybridization as a key ingredient for realizing and optimizing nonreciprocal superconducting transport in experimentally relevant hybrid nanowire Josephson junctions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Josephson diode effect (JDE) in multichannel Rashba nanowire Josephson junctions, focusing on inter-subband coupling. It claims that subband hybridization confines the topological phase to a finite window of Zeeman fields (unlike the single-channel limit), within which Majorana bound states strongly enhance diode efficiency; inter-subband coupling also enables finite JDE when the Zeeman field is parallel to the spin-orbit direction and increases overall efficiency via enhanced spectral asymmetry.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work demonstrates that multichannel effects are essential for realistic modeling of hybrid nanowire devices, providing a mechanism to optimize JDE performance and topological regimes that is absent in one-dimensional approximations. This could inform experimental design of Josephson diodes in semiconductor-superconductor platforms.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1 and Fig. 3] §4.1 and Fig. 3: The topological phase diagram is shown only for a single representative value of the inter-subband coupling strength; the claimed confinement of the topological phase to a finite Zeeman-field window is absent in the decoupled (single-channel) limit, yet no scan over a plausible range of coupling amplitudes is provided to establish robustness.
  2. [§5.2, Eq. (12)] §5.2, Eq. (12): The diode efficiency is extracted from the current-phase relation obtained via numerical diagonalization of the multichannel BdG Hamiltonian; the manuscript does not report convergence tests with respect to the number of transverse modes retained or the spatial discretization, which is load-bearing for the quantitative claim that inter-subband coupling 'significantly increases' efficiency.
  3. [§3.3] §3.3: The mechanism enabling finite JDE for Zeeman field aligned with the Rashba direction is attributed to inter-subband hybridization, but the text does not explicitly demonstrate that this contribution vanishes when the inter-subband matrix elements are set to zero while keeping all other parameters fixed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that Majorana bound states 'strongly enhance' diode efficiency, but the main text lacks a direct side-by-side quantitative comparison (e.g., efficiency vs. Zeeman field with and without MBS) for the same device parameters.
  2. Figure 2 caption should explicitly define the diode efficiency formula used and state the value of the inter-subband coupling employed in that panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.1 and Fig. 3] §4.1 and Fig. 3: The topological phase diagram is shown only for a single representative value of the inter-subband coupling strength; the claimed confinement of the topological phase to a finite Zeeman-field window is absent in the decoupled (single-channel) limit, yet no scan over a plausible range of coupling amplitudes is provided to establish robustness.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the robustness with respect to the inter-subband coupling strength should be demonstrated more explicitly. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new panel to Figure 3 or an additional figure showing the topological phase diagram for several values of the inter-subband coupling strength. This will confirm that the confinement of the topological phase to a finite window of Zeeman fields is robust for a range of coupling amplitudes relevant to experimental nanowire devices. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2, Eq. (12)] §5.2, Eq. (12): The diode efficiency is extracted from the current-phase relation obtained via numerical diagonalization of the multichannel BdG Hamiltonian; the manuscript does not report convergence tests with respect to the number of transverse modes retained or the spatial discretization, which is load-bearing for the quantitative claim that inter-subband coupling 'significantly increases' efficiency.

    Authors: The referee is correct that convergence tests are important for the reliability of the numerical results. We will include in the revised manuscript (likely in an appendix) detailed convergence tests with respect to the number of transverse modes and the spatial discretization. These tests will show that the diode efficiency values converge and that the enhancement due to inter-subband coupling remains significant. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3.3] §3.3: The mechanism enabling finite JDE for Zeeman field aligned with the Rashba direction is attributed to inter-subband hybridization, but the text does not explicitly demonstrate that this contribution vanishes when the inter-subband matrix elements are set to zero while keeping all other parameters fixed.

    Authors: To make this explicit, we will add a discussion and a supplementary figure in the revised version of Section 3.3. Specifically, we set the inter-subband matrix elements to zero while keeping other parameters fixed and show that the JDE indeed vanishes for the Zeeman field aligned with the Rashba (spin-orbit) direction, confirming the role of hybridization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results follow from direct solution of multichannel BdG Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper constructs an explicit multichannel Rashba nanowire Hamiltonian that includes inter-subband coupling terms as model inputs, then solves for the topological phase diagram and current-phase relation to obtain the JDE response. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the finite Zeeman window for the topological phase and the role of Majorana states in enhancing diode efficiency are computed outputs, not tautologies. The model assumptions (specific form of inter-subband Rashba and hopping) are stated up front and do not create self-definitional or fitted-input circularity. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian for Rashba nanowires with added inter-subband terms; no new entities are postulated. Free parameters include Zeeman field strength, chemical potential, Rashba coefficient, and inter-subband coupling strength, all of which are scanned rather than derived.

free parameters (3)
  • Zeeman field strength
    Scanned to map the topological phase boundary; value at which topology appears is not derived from first principles.
  • Inter-subband coupling amplitude
    Introduced to capture multichannel hybridization; its magnitude is a model input that controls the reported qualitative changes.
  • Chemical potential
    Tuned to place the system in the topological regime; typical for nanowire models.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The nanowire is described by a multichannel Rashba Hamiltonian with proximity-induced superconductivity and Zeeman field.
    Standard for hybrid nanowire literature; invoked to define the system under study.
  • standard math Majorana bound states appear at the ends when the system enters the topological phase.
    Follows from the bulk-boundary correspondence in 1D topological superconductors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5531 in / 1676 out tokens · 47507 ms · 2026-05-10T02:09:07.890131+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J.J.He, Y.Tanaka,andN.Nagaosa,Aphenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 053014 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The super- conducting diode effect, Nature Reviews Physics5, 558 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic supercon- ductingdiodeeffect,Phys.Rev.Lett.128,037001(2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2119548119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    H. F. Legg, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Superconducting diode effect due to magnetochiral anisotropy in topolog- ical insulators and rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. B106, 104501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Bhowmik, D

    S. Bhowmik, D. Samanta, A. K. Nandy, A. Saha, and S. K. Ghosh, Optimizing one dimensional superconduct- ing diodes: interplay of rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic fields, Communications Physics8, 260 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Bhowmik, D

    S. Bhowmik, D. Samanta, A. K. Nandy, A. Saha, and S. K. Ghosh, Field-free superconducting diode ef- fect in two-dimensional shiba lattices, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10832 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Field-free Superconduct- ing Diode Effect and Topological Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin- Ovchinnikov Superconductivity in Altermagnetic Shiba Chains,

    D. Samanta and S. K. Ghosh, Field-free superconduct- ing diode effect and topological fulde-ferrell supercon- ductivity in altermagnetic shiba chains, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21446 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju,et al., Josephson diode effect from cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Na- ture physics18, 1228 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    S. K. Ghosh, M. Smidman, T. Shang, J. F. Annett, A. D. Hillier, J. Quintanilla, and H. Yuan, Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking, J. Phys. Condens. Matter33, 033001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Shang, S

    T. Shang, S. K. Ghosh, M. Smidman, D. J. Gawryluk, C. Baines, A. Wang, W. Xie, Y. Chen, M. O. Ajeesh, M. Nicklas, E. Pomjakushina, M. Medarde, M. Shi, J. F. Annett, H. Yuan, J. Quintanilla, and T. Shiroka, Spin- triplet superconductivity in Weyl nodal-line semimetals, npj Quantum Mater.7, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Shang, M

    T. Shang, M. Smidman, S. K. Ghosh, C. Baines, L. J. Chang, D. J. Gawryluk, J. A. T. Barker, R. P. Singh, D. M. Paul, G. Balakrishnan, E. Pomjakushina, M. Shi, M. Medarde, A. D. Hillier, H. Q. Yuan, J. Quintanilla, J. Mesot, and T. Shiroka, Time-reversal symmetry break- ing in re-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 257002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Shang, S

    T. Shang, S. K. Ghosh, J. Z. Zhao, L.-J. Chang, C. Baines, M. K. Lee, D. J. Gawryluk, M. Shi, M. Medarde, J. Quintanilla, and T. Shiroka, Time- reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric zr3Irsuperconductor, Phys. Rev. B102, 020503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Sajilesh K, R

    P. Sajilesh K, R. K. Kushwaha, D. Samanta, T. Tula, P. K. Meena, S. Srivastava, D. Singh, P. K. Biswas, A. Kanigel, A. D. Hillier,et al., Time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity in hfrhge: A noncentrosym- 14 metric weyl semimetal, Advanced Materials37, 2415721 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Kataria, S

    A. Kataria, S. Srivastava, D. Samanta, P. Yadav, P. Manna, S. Sharma, P. Mishra, J. Barker, A. D. Hillier, A. Agarwal,et al., Observation of time-reversal symme- try breaking in the type-i superconductor ybsb _2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.07460 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Physics Letters1, 251 (1962)

    B. Josephson, Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling, Physics Letters1, 251 (1962)

    work page 1962

  17. [17]

    K. K. Likharev, Superconducting weak links, Rev. Mod. Phys.51, 101 (1979)

    work page 1979

  18. [18]

    A. A. Golubov, M. Y. Kupriyanov, and E. Il’ichev, The current-phase relation in josephson junctions, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 411 (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal joseph- son diode effect, Science Advances8, eabo0309 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Gu, P. Li, J. Hu, and K. Jiang, General the- ory of josephson diodes, Phys. Rev. X12, 041013 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    P.-H. Fu, Y. Xu, S. A. Yang, C. H. Lee, Y. S. Ang, and J.- F. Liu, Field-effect josephson diode via asymmetric spin- momentum locking states, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 054057 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Cheng and Q.-F

    Q. Cheng and Q.-F. Sun, Josephson diode based on con- ventional superconductors and a chiral quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B107, 184511 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Debnath and P

    D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Gate-tunable josephson diode effect in rashba spin-orbit coupled quantum dot junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B109, 174511 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Debnath and P

    D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Field-free josephson diode ef- fect in interacting chiral quantum dot junctions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 175301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Karabassov, I

    T. Karabassov, I. V. Bobkova, A. A. Golubov, and A. S. Vasenko, Hybrid helical state and superconducting diode effect in superconductor/ferromagnet/topological insula- tor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B106, 224509 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    B. Lu, S. Ikegaya, P. Burset, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, Tunable josephson diode effect on the surface of topolog- ical insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 096001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    J. Wang, Y. Jiang, J. J. Wang, and J.-F. Liu, Efficient josephson diode effect on a two-dimensional topological insulator with asymmetric magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075412 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Fracassi, S

    S. Fracassi, S. Traverso, N. Traverso Ziani, M. Carrega, S. Heun, and M. Sassetti, Anomalous supercurrent and diode effect in locally perturbed topological josephson junctions, Applied Physics Letters124, 242601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Huang, T

    H. Huang, T. de Picoli, and J. I. VÀyrynen, Supercon- ducting diode effect in two-dimensional topological in- sulator edges and josephson junctions, Applied Physics Letters125, 032602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Field-free josephson diode effect in altermagnet/normal metal/altermagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, 014518 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Boruah, S

    A. Boruah, S. Acharjee, and P. K. Saikia, Field-free josephson diode effect in an ising- superconductor/altermagnet/ising-superconductor josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B112, 054505 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Jiang, H.-L

    Y. Jiang, H.-L. Liu, and J. Wang, Josephson diode ef- fect in altermagnet-based s-wave superconductor junc- tion, Chinese Physics B34, 107803 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Sharma and M

    L. Sharma and M. Thakurathi, Tunable josephson diode effect in singlet superconductor-altermagnet-triplet su- perconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B112, 104506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. Feinberg, and M. Avignon, Spin-orbit-induced chirality of andreev states in josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B86, 214519 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Z. Liu, L. Huang, and J. Wang, Josephson diode effect in topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B110, 014519 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    J. S. Meyer and M. Houzet, Josephson diode effect in a ballistic single-channel nanowire, AppliedPhysicsLetters 125, 022603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    A. A. Kopasov, A. G. Kutlin, and A. S. Mel’nikov, Ge- ometry controlled superconducting diode and anomalous josephson effect triggered by the topological phase transi- tion in curved proximitized nanowires, Phys. Rev. B103, 144520 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Maiellaro, M

    A. Maiellaro, M. Trama, J. Settino, C. Guarcello, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Engineered Josephson diode ef- fect in kinked Rashba nanochannels, SciPost Phys.17, 101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson diode effect in supercurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Y. V. Fominov and D. S. Mikhailov, Asymmetric higher- harmonic squid as a josephson diode, Phys. Rev. B106, 134514 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Ciaccia, R

    C. Ciaccia, R. Haller, A. C. C. Drachmann, T. Linde- mann, M. J. Manfra, C. Schrade, and C. Schönenberger, Gate-tunable josephson diode in proximitized inas su- percurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033131 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    H. F. Legg, K. Laubscher, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Parity-protected superconducting diode effect in topo- logical josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B108, 214520 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    J. J. Cuozzo, W. Pan, J. Shabani, and E. Rossi, Microwave-tunable diode effect in asymmetric squids with topological josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    J. Qi, M. Lu, J. Liu, C.-Z. Chen, and X. C. Xie, Non- hermitian superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 112, L060502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic new platform for topological quantum compu- tation using semiconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 040502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device, Phys

    J. Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device, Phys. Rev. B81, 125318 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Cayao, A

    J. Cayao, A. M. Black-Schaffer, E. Prada, and R. Aguado, Andreev spectrum and supercurrents in nanowire-basedsnsjunctionscontainingmajoranabound states, Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology9, 1339 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Cayao, N

    J. Cayao, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tanaka, Enhancing the josephson diode effect with majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B109, L081405 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    S.Mondal, P.-H.Fu,andJ.Cayao,Josephsondiodeeffect with andreev and majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B 15 112, 144506 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    R. M. Lutchyn, T. D. Stanescu, and S. Das Sarma, Search for majorana fermions in multiband semiconduct- ing nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 127001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    A. E. Antipov, A. Bargerbos, G. W. Winkler, B. Bauer, E.Rossi,andR.M.Lutchyn,Effectsofgate-inducedelec- tric fields on semiconductor majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. X8, 031041 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    C. Payá, R. Aguado, P. San-Jose, and E. Prada, Joseph- son effect and critical currents in trivial and topological full-shell hybrid nanowires, Phys. Rev. B111, 235420 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Park and A

    S. Park and A. L. Yeyati, Andreev spin qubits in mul- tichannel rashba nanowires, Phys. Rev. B96, 125416 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    R. M. Lutchyn, E. P. Bakkers, L. P. Kouwenhoven, P. Krogstrup, C. M. Marcus, and Y. Oreg, Majo- rana zero modes in superconductor–semiconductor het- erostructures, Nature Reviews Materials3, 52 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    San-Jose, E

    P. San-Jose, E. Prada, and R. Aguado, Mapping the topological phase diagram of multiband semiconductors with supercurrents, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 137001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    T. D. Stanescu, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B84, 144522 (2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    A. C. Potter and P. A. Lee, Majorana end states in multi- band microstructures with rashba spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B83, 094525 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    universal

    C. Beenakker, Three “universal” mesoscopic josephson ef- fects, inTransport Phenomena in Mesoscopic Systems: Proceedings of the 14th Taniguchi Symposium, Shima, Japan, November 10–14, 1991(Springer, 1992) pp. 235– 253

    work page 1991

  61. [61]

    Santra, D

    S. Santra, D. Samanta, and S. K. Ghosh, Superconduct- ing diode effect in multichannel majorana wires, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01207 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Cayao, P

    J. Cayao, P. San-Jose, A. M. Black-Schaffer, R. Aguado, and E. Prada, Majorana splitting from critical currents in josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B96, 205425 (2017)

    work page 2017