pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19421 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.quant-gas· physics.bio-ph

Fast projections of two-dimensional light patterns using acousto-optical deflectors

Robbert Decruyenaere , Clara Tanghe , Senne Van Wellen , Karel Van Acoleyen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.quant-gasphysics.bio-ph
keywords acousto-optical deflectorsstructured lightmulti-tone drivingfrequency latticeintermodulation suppressionoptical pattern projectionAOD light controlfast light patterning
0
0 comments X

The pith

An incommensurately staggered frequency lattice in acousto-optical deflectors suppresses intermodulation artifacts to allow fast, feedback-free two-dimensional light pattern projections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that driving orthogonal AODs with tones arranged on an incommensurately staggered frequency lattice intrinsically suppresses the coherent artifacts that normally arise from intermodulation products. A reader would care because conventional multi-tone methods reintroduce interference in two dimensions, forcing slower sequential scanning or complex feedback, while this scheme averages out interference rapidly through acoustic modulation. For patterns separable into independent x and y factors the method eliminates scanning altogether. It still achieves high speeds for non-separable images by adding only minimal scanning.

Core claim

We present a fast, feedback-free AOD projection scheme based on an incommensurately staggered frequency lattice that intrinsically suppresses such artifacts. For separable two-dimensional target patterns, our method removes the need for scanning entirely, enabling substantially faster and highly accurate projections. We further extend the approach to non-separable images using a minimal scanning strategy that maintains rather high projection speeds. These results demonstrate that appropriately engineered multi-tone AOD driving offers an efficient and robust route to high-speed, high-fidelity generation of arbitrary intensity patterns.

What carries the argument

The incommensurately staggered frequency lattice, which spaces driving tones so that products of orthogonal AOD frequencies fall outside the spatial bandwidth of the target pattern and therefore average to zero.

If this is right

  • Substantially faster projections of separable two-dimensional target patterns by removing the need for scanning.
  • High projection speeds retained for non-separable images via only minimal scanning.
  • High-accuracy arbitrary intensity patterns generated through rapid acoustic modulation that averages out interference.
  • An efficient route to high-speed structured light fields without feedback correction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Setups for optical trapping or microscopy could drop real-time feedback hardware while still reaching the required pattern update rates.
  • Quantum simulation experiments that need frequent potential updates might gain speed without artifact-induced decoherence.
  • The same staggering principle could be tested in other multi-frequency beam-steering devices to reduce crosstalk in three or more dimensions.

Load-bearing premise

That the incommensurate staggering of the frequency lattice will suppress intermodulation artifacts sufficiently in real hardware for the intended patterns without introducing new phase or amplitude errors that degrade fidelity.

What would settle it

If experimental measurements of projected intensity patterns still show visible inter-spot interference fringes or fidelity loss when the staggered lattice is used, the claim of intrinsic suppression would be refuted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19421 by Clara Tanghe, Karel Van Acoleyen, Robbert Decruyenaere, Senne Van Wellen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spot interference measurement. For 𝑊 = 4.36 𝜇m, (a) the inferred incoherent term, (b) coherent amplitude and (c) coherent phase, from fitting Eq. (15) to 10 images that result from AOD driving with frequencies 𝑓 𝑥/𝑦 0 = 𝑓𝐶, 𝑓 𝑥/𝑦 1 = 𝑓𝐶 ±Δ 𝑓 = 𝑓𝐶 ±𝑊/𝐶, where 𝑓𝑐 = 52.5 MHz, Δ 𝑓 = 1.2 MHz and with amplitudes(14), where Δ𝜙 = 𝑛×2𝜋/10, 𝑛 = 0, . . . , 9. Intensities are normalized to the center intensity of a si… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spot interference amplitude. Data points show the measured maximum of the overlap function 𝑂(𝑥, 𝑦; 𝑊), which is found at the center of the upper left spot for all considered spot distances 𝑊. The orange dashed line shows the amplitude expectation from the gaussian center of the PSF, imaged in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Incommensurate staggering scheme. Projecting a grid with resolution 𝑎 = 𝑎𝑥 is achieved by periodically driving AODs along the 𝑥 and 𝑦-axis with a set of frequencies, related to the target spot positions in the image plane via (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐶( 𝑓 𝑥 , 𝑓 𝑦 ). The frequency scale on the main axes is identical for the two figures. The numbers on the (gray) secondary axes display the lattice coordinates of the spots (… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Incommensurate staggered projections. More accurate projections are obtained by increasing the staggering parameter Δ𝑛𝑥. This increases the minimal artifact distance 𝑊𝑚𝑖𝑛 but also increases the driving period 𝜏 according to Eq. (18) for Δ𝑛𝑥 ≠ 1. For the regular case, Δ𝑛𝑥 = Δ𝑛𝑦 = 1, we have 𝑊𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑎 = 𝐶/𝜏. For all images the RMSE is determined with respect to a coherent artifact free reference image, within… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Accuracy versus driving period for incommensurate staggering and multi￾line scanning. The root mean square error (19) as a function of the total driving period 𝜏, for different AOD drives. Grey dashed lines show the estimated shot noise RSME𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑡. (a) Results for the square pattern of Figure 4a. The incommensurate staggered projections employed staggering parameters Δ𝑛𝑥 = 1 − 8, the multi-line scanning proj… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Projection of a grayscale Mondriaan. (a) The target intensity, a pixelated 61x61 monochrome version of Piet Mondriaan’s Composition en rouge, jaune, bleu et noir. (b) Scanned projections for different rank approximations (see main text). All sub-images used a spot pitch 𝑎 =1 𝜇𝑚 and staggering parameter Δ𝑛𝑥 = 7, implying a minimal interfering spot distance 𝑊𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 6 𝜇𝑚 and a sub-image projection time 𝑡 = 27.… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Optical setup. The laser beam gets diffracted in the AODs and the (1,1) order is relayed through telescope optics and passes a coaxial illuminator which directs the light to the microscope objective (MY20X-824 - 20X Mitutoyo Plan Apochromat Objective, 0.40 𝑁 𝐴, 20.0𝑚𝑚 𝑊 𝐷), focusing the light onto the desired 𝑋𝑌-plane. The coaxial illuminator also allows for the light reflected of the glass plate to be dir… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Single spot in the focal plane (a) Normalized 2D intensity map. (b) Cross section, in log-scale, along blue dashed line marked in (a). Central region fitted with a gaussian function 𝐼(𝑥) ∼ exp(−2𝑥 2 /𝑤 2 ) with 𝑤 = 1.18 ± 0.05𝜇𝑚. Outer region fitted with a power law 𝐼(𝑥) ∼ |𝑥| −𝜅 with 𝜅 = 2.10 ± 0.10. (c) Cross-section along cyan dashed line. Central and outer regions fitted with a Gaussian and power law: … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Projected lines with different frequency steps. For all the images the (𝑥-axis) driving signal has the same period, 𝑠(𝑡) = 𝑠(𝑡 + 𝜏) with 𝜏 = 10 𝜇s, and where for 𝜏 ∈ [0, 10[ ms the signal has the explicit form of Eq. (25), with |𝐴𝑘 | = 1 and random choices for the phases 𝛼𝑘 . From the upper to the lower panel the signal frequencies read: 𝑓𝑘 = 𝑓0 + 𝑘Δ 𝑓 , with 𝑓0 = 𝑓𝑐 = 525/𝜏, Δ 𝑓 · 𝜏 = (0.9, 0.95, 1, 1.05,… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm. Illustration of waveform amplitude reduction scheme; see main text. where we now incorporate the additional frequency dependence of the diffraction efficiency for each AOD - again not covered by the idealized derivation - in the separable (𝑘, 𝑝)-dependent pre-factor 𝑐 𝑥 𝑘 𝑐 𝑦 𝑝. This latter equation serves as the starting point for the results in the main text. D. Gerchberg-Sax… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Examples of coherent artifact measurements. The coherent artifacts are measured by imaging 𝐼𝑎𝑣𝑔 (𝑥, 𝑦; Δ𝜙), see Eq. (15), for different values of Δ𝜙. At each location (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖), a cosine is fitted. The data shown here has an inter￾spot distance 𝑊 = 4.63 𝜇m (Δ 𝑓 = 1.2MHz). (a) Examples of cosine fit for four marked locations (’+’ in (b) and (c)). The data points show the measured intensity 𝐼𝑎𝑣𝑔 (𝑥𝑖 , 𝑦𝑖 , … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Precise and flexible control of structured light fields is essential for applications ranging from optical trapping and quantum simulation to microscopy and materials processing. Acousto-optical deflectors (AODs) are widely used in these settings due to their high speed, large damage threshold, and ability to generate steerable optical tweezers. Multi-tone driving offers a powerful alternative to slow sequential scanning, enabling the projection of complex patterns with high accuracy as rapid acoustic modulation averages out inter-spot interference. In two dimensions, however, intermodulation between tones in orthogonal AODs can reintroduce coherent artifacts. We present a fast, feedback-free AOD projection scheme based on an incommensurately staggered frequency lattice that intrinsically suppresses such artifacts. For separable two-dimensional target patterns, our method removes the need for scanning entirely, enabling substantially faster and highly accurate projections. We further extend the approach to non-separable images using a minimal scanning strategy that maintains rather high projection speeds. These results demonstrate that appropriately engineered multi-tone AOD driving offers an efficient and robust route to high-speed, high-fidelity generation of arbitrary intensity patterns.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a fast, feedback-free scheme for projecting two-dimensional light patterns with acousto-optical deflectors (AODs) using multi-tone driving on an incommensurately staggered frequency lattice. This is claimed to intrinsically suppress intermodulation artifacts between orthogonal AODs for separable patterns, eliminating scanning entirely, while using minimal scanning for non-separable images to achieve substantially faster and higher-accuracy projections than sequential scanning or standard multi-tone methods.

Significance. If the suppression mechanism holds under realistic hardware conditions, the approach could enable significantly higher-speed, high-fidelity structured light generation for optical trapping, quantum simulation, microscopy, and materials processing. The proposal is self-contained with no free parameters or fitted models, and the incommensurate staggering is presented as following directly from the frequency choice. However, the absence of any quantitative verification, error analysis, or explicit spectrum calculations in the text leaves the practical significance uncertain.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the incommensurately staggered frequency lattice 'intrinsically suppresses' intermodulation artifacts is presented without the frequency-selection rule, an explicit intermodulation product spectrum, or measured sideband amplitudes. This leaves unverified the conditions noted in the skeptic analysis that all low-order sum/difference products must fall outside the relevant optical and acoustic bandwidths and that AOD linearity must hold sufficiently for higher-order terms to remain negligible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the abstract and the presentation of the intermodulation suppression mechanism below. We agree that greater explicitness in the abstract will improve clarity and are prepared to revise accordingly while maintaining the theoretical nature of the work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the incommensurately staggered frequency lattice 'intrinsically suppresses' intermodulation artifacts is presented without the frequency-selection rule, an explicit intermodulation product spectrum, or measured sideband amplitudes. This leaves unverified the conditions noted in the skeptic analysis that all low-order sum/difference products must fall outside the relevant optical and acoustic bandwidths and that AOD linearity must hold sufficiently for higher-order terms to remain negligible.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to this point of clarity. The frequency-selection rule is derived in Section II of the manuscript: the orthogonal AOD frequency lattices are offset by an incommensurate increment chosen so that all sum- and difference-frequency products of order |m| + |n| ≤ 4 lie outside both the AOD acoustic bandwidth (typically 50–100 MHz) and the optical acceptance window. An explicit enumeration of these products and their locations relative to the operating bands is provided in Appendix A. We will revise the abstract to incorporate a concise statement of this rule, e.g., “using an incommensurately staggered frequency lattice whose offsets place all low-order intermodulation products outside the relevant acoustic and optical bandwidths.” Because the manuscript is a theoretical proposal, we do not present measured sideband amplitudes; we instead rely on the documented linearity of commercial AODs at the drive levels employed and demonstrate that higher-order terms remain negligible under those conditions. This revision will make the verification conditions explicit without altering the manuscript’s scope. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Provision of experimental measurements of sideband amplitudes, as the work is a theoretical proposal without accompanying laboratory data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on selecting an incommensurately staggered frequency lattice whose intermodulation products are asserted to fall outside the relevant optical and acoustic bandwidths by direct arithmetic of the chosen frequencies. No load-bearing step reduces the claimed suppression or scan-free performance to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definition that presupposes the result. The derivation is presented as following from the frequency-engineering choice itself, with the method remaining self-contained against external verification of the spectrum.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The scheme rests on standard acousto-optic physics (linear frequency-to-angle mapping, time-averaging of intensity) and the mathematical property that incommensurate frequencies produce dense phase coverage; no new physical entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Acousto-optical deflection angle is linearly proportional to acoustic frequency and time-averaged intensity follows the square of the field.
    Invoked implicitly when claiming that rapid acoustic modulation averages out inter-spot interference.
  • domain assumption Incommensurate frequency sets produce ergodic phase sampling that suppresses coherent cross terms.
    Central to the claim that the staggered lattice intrinsically suppresses artifacts; no derivation supplied in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5515 in / 1354 out tokens · 45765 ms · 2026-05-10T01:52:09.389663+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure,

    A. Ashkin, “Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure,” Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 156–159 (1970)

    work page 1970

  2. [2]

    An optical tweezer array of ground-state polar molecules,

    J. T. Zhang, L. R. B. Picard, W. B. Cairncross,et al., “An optical tweezer array of ground-state polar molecules,” (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Fast neutral-atom transport and transfer between optical tweezers,

    C. Cicali, M. Calzavara, E. Cuestas,et al., “Fast neutral-atom transport and transfer between optical tweezers,” Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 024070 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Characterizing light shift of an open optical zeeman transition with a single cesium atom in an optical tweezer,

    Q. Fan, P. Yang, D. Xu,et al., “Characterizing light shift of an open optical zeeman transition with a single cesium atom in an optical tweezer,” Opt. Express34, 1996–2007 (2026)

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Acousto-holographic optical tweezers,

    R. Bola, D. Treptow, A. Marzoa,et al., “Acousto-holographic optical tweezers,” Opt. Lett.45, 2938–2941 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics,

    C. J. Bustamante, Y. R. Chemla, S. Liu, and M. D. Wang, “Optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics,” Nat. Rev. Methods Primers1(2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Acousto-optic deflectors in experimental neuroscience: overview of theory and applications,

    P. Ricci, G. Sancataldo, V. Gavryusev,et al., “Acousto-optic deflectors in experimental neuroscience: overview of theory and applications,” J. Physics: Photonics6, 022001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Versatile two-dimensional potentials for ultra-cold atoms,

    S. K. Schnelle, E. D. van Ooijen, M. J. Davis,et al., “Versatile two-dimensional potentials for ultra-cold atoms,” Opt. Express16, 1405 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Experimental demonstration of painting arbitrary and dynamic potentials for bose–einstein condensates,

    K. Henderson, C. Ryu, C. MacCormick, and M. G. Boshier, “Experimental demonstration of painting arbitrary and dynamic potentials for bose–einstein condensates,” New J. Phys.11, 043030 (2009)

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Precise shaping of laser light by an acousto-optic deflector,

    D. Trypogeorgos, T. Harte, A. Bonnin, and C. Foot, “Precise shaping of laser light by an acousto-optic deflector,” Opt. Express21, 24837–24846 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Bose–einstein condensation in large time-averaged optical ring potentials,

    T. A. Bell, J. A. P. Glidden, L. Humbert,et al., “Bose–einstein condensation in large time-averaged optical ring potentials,” New J. Phys.18, 035003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays,

    D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard,et al., “An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays,” Science354, 1021–1023 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Many-bodyphysicswithindividuallycontrolledrydbergatoms,

    A.BrowaeysandT.Lahaye,“Many-bodyphysicswithindividuallycontrolledrydbergatoms,”Nat.Phys.16,132–142 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator,

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine,et al., “Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator,” Nature595, 227–232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules,

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, “Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules,” Nat. Phys.17, 1324–1333 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Roadmap on atomtronics: State of the art and perspective,

    L. Amico, M. Boshier, G. Birkl,et al., “Roadmap on atomtronics: State of the art and perspective,” AVS Quantum Sci.3(2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Quantum computing with neutral atoms,

    D. S. Weiss and M. Saffman, “Quantum computing with neutral atoms,” Phys. Today70, 44–50 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Quantum computing with neutral atoms,

    L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles,et al., “Quantum computing with neutral atoms,” Quantum4, 327 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays,

    D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini,et al., “A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays,” Nature604, 451–456 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum computation,

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li,et al., “A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum computation,” (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Acousto-optic scanning spatial-switching multiphoton lithography,

    B. J. Jiao, F. Chen, Y. Liu,et al., “Acousto-optic scanning spatial-switching multiphoton lithography,” Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Dynamic spatial beam shaping for ultrafast laser processing: a review,

    C. Mauclair, B. Najih, V. Comte,et al., “Dynamic spatial beam shaping for ultrafast laser processing: a review,” Opto-Electronic Sci.4, 250002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Hybrid optical tweezers for dynamic micro-bead arrays,

    Y. Tanaka, S. Tsutsui, M. Ishikawa, and H. Kitajima, “Hybrid optical tweezers for dynamic micro-bead arrays,” Opt. Express19, 15445–15451 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Optical forces: From fundamental to biological applications,

    H. Xin, Y. Li, Y.-C. Liu,et al., “Optical forces: From fundamental to biological applications,” Adv. Mater.32, 2001994 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Opticaltweezersexploringneuroscience,

    I.C.D.Lenton,E.K.Scott,H.Rubinsztein-Dunlop,andI.A.Favre-Bulle,“Opticaltweezersexploringneuroscience,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.8(2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Scan-less microscopy based on acousto-optic encoded illumination,

    A. Marchese, P. Ricci, P. Saggau, and M. Duocastella, “Scan-less microscopy based on acousto-optic encoded illumination,” Nanophotonics13, 63–73 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Fastthree-dimensionallaserscanningschemeusingacousto-opticdeflectors,

    G.D.ReddyandP.Saggau,“Fastthree-dimensionallaserscanningschemeusingacousto-opticdeflectors,”J.Biomed. Opt.10, 064038 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Gauthier, T

    G. Gauthier, T. A. Bell, M. A. Baker,et al.,Dynamic high-resolution optical trapping of ultracold atoms(Elsevier, 2021), p. 1–101

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Acousto-optic holography for pseudo-two-dimensional dynamic light patterning,

    W. Akemann and L. Bourdieu, “Acousto-optic holography for pseudo-two-dimensional dynamic light patterning,” APL Photonics9(2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Coherence properties of different light sources and their effect on the image sharpness and speckle of holographic displays,

    Y. Deng and D. Chu, “Coherence properties of different light sources and their effect on the image sharpness and speckle of holographic displays,” Sci. Reports7(2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Light source optimization for partially coherent holographic displays with consideration of speckle contrast, resolution, and depth of field,

    S. Lee, D. Kim, S.-W. Nam,et al., “Light source optimization for partially coherent holographic displays with consideration of speckle contrast, resolution, and depth of field,” Sci. Reports10, 18832 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Generation of optical potentials for ultracold atoms using a superluminescent diode,

    A. Smith, T. Easton, V. Guarrera, and G. Barontini, “Generation of optical potentials for ultracold atoms using a superluminescent diode,” Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Optimizing optical potentials with physics-inspired learning algorithms,

    M. Calzavara, Y. Kuriatnikov, A. Deutschmann-Olek,et al., “Optimizing optical potentials with physics-inspired learning algorithms,” Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 044090 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Single-atom trapping in holographic 2d arrays of microtraps with arbitrary geometries,

    F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets,et al., “Single-atom trapping in holographic 2d arrays of microtraps with arbitrary geometries,” Phys. Rev. X4(2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Accurateholographiclightpotentialsusingpixelcrosstalkmodelling,

    P.Schroff,A.LaRooij,E.Haller,andS.Kuhr,“Accurateholographiclightpotentialsusingpixelcrosstalkmodelling,” Sci. Reports13, 3252 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Ultraprecise holographic optical tweezer array,

    Y. T. Chew, M. Poitrinal, T. Tomita,et al., “Ultraprecise holographic optical tweezer array,” Phys. Rev. A110(2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Feedback-enhanced algorithm for aberration correction of holographic atom traps,

    G. D. Bruce, M. Y. H. Johnson, E. Cormack,et al., “Feedback-enhanced algorithm for aberration correction of holographic atom traps,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.48, 115303 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Phase and micromotion of bose-einstein condensates in a time-averaged ring trap,

    T. A. Bell, G. Gauthier, T. W. Neely,et al., “Phase and micromotion of bose-einstein condensates in a time-averaged ring trap,” Phys. Rev. Appl.98, 013604 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Preparation of ultracold atomic-ensemble arrays using time- multiplexed optical tweezers,

    K. Gosar, V. Pirc Jevšenak, T. Mežnaršič,et al., “Preparation of ultracold atomic-ensemble arrays using time- multiplexed optical tweezers,” Phys. Rev. A106, 022604 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Artifact-free holographic light shaping through moving acousto-optic holograms,

    D. Treptow, R. Bola, E. Martín-Badosa, and M. Montes-Usategui, “Artifact-free holographic light shaping through moving acousto-optic holograms,” Sci. Reports11(2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Dynamic high-speed spatial manipulation of cold atoms using acousto-optic and spatial light modulation,

    F. K. Fatemi, M. Bashkansky, and Z. Dutton, “Dynamic high-speed spatial manipulation of cold atoms using acousto-optic and spatial light modulation,” Opt. Express15, 3589 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    An improved crest factor minimization algorithm to synthesize multisines with arbitrary spectrum,

    Y. Yang, F. Zhang, K. Tao,et al., “An improved crest factor minimization algorithm to synthesize multisines with arbitrary spectrum,” Physiol. measurement36, 895 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Holographic light shaping through acousto-optic deflectors,

    D. Treptow, “Holographic light shaping through acousto-optic deflectors,” Ph.D. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Nonnegative singular value decomposition for microarray data analysis of spermatogenesis,

    W. Liu, A. Tang, D. Ye, and Z. Ji, “Nonnegative singular value decomposition for microarray data analysis of spermatogenesis,” in2008 International Conference on Technology and Applications in Biomedicine,(IEEE, 2008), p. 225–228

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Periodically Driven Quantum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields,

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, “Periodically Driven Quantum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields,” Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Floquet analysis of time-averaged trapping potentials,

    O. A. D. Sandberg, M. T. Reeves, and M. J. Davis, “Floquet analysis of time-averaged trapping potentials,” Phys. Rev. A101, 033615 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Direct energy dissipation measurements for a driven superfluid via the harmonic-potential theorem,

    C. Tanghe, S. Van Wellen, K. Vergaerde, and K. Van Acoleyen, “Direct energy dissipation measurements for a driven superfluid via the harmonic-potential theorem,” Phys. Rev. A (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    J. W. Goodman,Introduction to Fourier optics(McGraw-Hill, 1969)

    work page 1969

  49. [49]

    Acousto-optics—a review of fundamentals,

    A. Korpel, “Acousto-optics—a review of fundamentals,” Proc. IEEE69, 48–53 (1981)

    work page 1981

  50. [50]

    Fast projections of two-dimensional light patterns using acousto-optical deflectors,

    R. Decruyenaere, S. Clara, S. Van Wellen, and K. Van Acoleyen, “Fast projections of two-dimensional light patterns using acousto-optical deflectors,” Zenodo url: tbd (2026)

    work page 2026