pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19577 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Quasinormal modes of charged covariant effective black holes with a cosmological constant

Zhongzhinan Dong , Jinsong Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quasinormal modesblack holesquantum gravitycosmological constantscalar perturbationsovertone outburstseffective modelsmode interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum corrections to charged black holes with a cosmological constant introduce new spectral features and mode interactions in their quasinormal ringing rather than only shifting frequencies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors study scalar perturbations of two covariant effective black hole spacetimes that include a quantum parameter zeta along with electric charge and a cosmological constant. Numerical computation via the pseudo-spectral method shows that zeta alters the full set of quasinormal frequencies while preserving non-monotonic dependence on charge and the occurrence of overtone outbursts. The quantum term does more than rescale amplitudes: it generates additional peaks in the overtone spectrum and drives crossings and merging-splitting between complex and purely imaginary modes, especially near extremality. These interactions point to a link between overtone outbursts and the mixing of mode families, underscoring why the entire spectrum must be examined instead of the fundamental mode alone.

Core claim

In the charged covariant effective black holes with quantum parameter zeta, cosmological constant Lambda, and charge Q, the quasinormal frequencies computed for scalar perturbations retain non-monotonic behavior and overtone outbursts under variation of zeta, yet the quantum correction adds distinct new features to the overtone spectrum and produces rich interactions, including damping-rate crossings and merging-splitting, between complex and purely imaginary modes that accompany the outbursts in near-extremal regimes.

What carries the argument

The pseudo-spectral discretization of the radial perturbation equation on the covariant effective metrics, which yields the full discrete set of complex frequencies including overtones and allows tracking of their trajectories as parameters vary.

If this is right

  • Non-monotonic dependence on charge and overtone outbursts survive the inclusion of the quantum parameter.
  • Overtone outbursts acquire extra spectral features that are absent in the classical limit.
  • Complex and purely imaginary modes exhibit damping-rate crossings and merging-splitting near extremality.
  • These mode interactions are systematically associated with the outbursts, suggesting a dynamical connection.
  • Analysis limited to the fundamental mode misses the dominant new structures induced by quantum corrections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed mode crossings could produce distinctive late-time tails in gravitational-wave signals from near-extremal black holes.
  • Similar interaction patterns may appear when other quantum-inspired corrections are added to the same background.
  • Tracking the full spectrum rather than isolated modes could become a diagnostic tool for distinguishing classical from quantum-corrected black-hole geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The covariant effective black hole metric with the single parameter zeta faithfully encodes the quantum gravity effects that matter for quasinormal modes, and the pseudo-spectral solver converges to the true frequencies without numerical artifacts.

What would settle it

A recomputation of the full spectrum for the same family of metrics that finds neither additional overtone peaks nor damping-rate crossings or merging-splitting when zeta is varied would falsify the reported spectral modifications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19577 by Jinsong Yang, Zhongzhinan Dong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The maximum and minimum charge values, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The critical value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase diagrams Re( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The QNFs of fundamental modes for Solution 1 are presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The QNFs of the first few overtone modes for Solution 1 are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The QNFs of the first overtone modes ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Phase diagrams Re( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The QNFs of fundamental modes for Solution 2 are pre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The QNFs of the first few overtone modes for Solution 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The QNFs of the first complex overtone modes( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The damping-rate crossing of QNFs for Solution 1 as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The damping-rate crossing of QNFs for Solution 1 as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. QNFs of the first complex overtone modes (blue lines) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Fundamental complex QNFs for Solution 1 are presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Fundamental complex QNFs for Solution 2 are presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the quasinormal modes of two covariant effective black holes characterized by the quantum parameter $\zeta$, charge $Q$, and cosmological constant $\Lambda$, under the scalar perturbation. By employing the pseudo-spectral method, we numerically calculate the quasinormal frequencies and analyze the influence of $\zeta$ on the spectra with respect to $Q$. Our results demonstrate that while the quantum parameter $\zeta$ significantly modifies the quasinormal frequency spectrum, the non-monotonic behavior and overtone outbursts persist. Notably, the impact of quantum gravity on the overtone outbursts is not merely limited to enhancement or suppression; instead, it introduces additional spectral features. Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis of the full quasinormal mode spectrum reveals rich interactions between complex and purely imaginary modes, including damping-rate crossings and merging-splitting behavior. These phenomena typically accompany overtone outbursts in near-extremal regimes, suggesting a potential connection between mode interactions and overtone outbursts. This work emphasizes the necessity of analyzing the full quasinormal frequency spectrum rather than focussing solely on fundamental modes, and provides novel insights into its underlying spectral structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper examines the quasinormal modes of scalar perturbations on charged covariant effective black holes with quantum parameter ζ, charge Q, and cosmological constant Λ. Using the pseudo-spectral method, the authors calculate the quasinormal frequencies and report that ζ alters the spectrum, maintaining non-monotonic behaviors and overtone outbursts while adding new spectral features. The full spectrum analysis reveals interactions between complex and imaginary modes, such as damping-rate crossings and merging-splitting, linked to near-extremal overtone outbursts.

Significance. Should the numerical findings prove reliable, the manuscript advances the field by demonstrating that quantum gravity effects via ζ introduce nuanced changes to the quasinormal spectrum, not just monotonic shifts. The emphasis on full spectrum analysis and direct numerical computation without circular parameter fitting is a strength, offering potential insights for black hole spectroscopy in quantum gravity contexts.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical results section] The central claims of additional spectral features, damping-rate crossings, and merging-splitting behavior (abstract and results) rest on the pseudo-spectral solver output. No grid-convergence tables, residual norms, or cross-validation with independent methods are provided for the near-extremal parameter values where these delicate phenomena are reported. This is load-bearing for the conclusions about mode interactions and quantum gravity effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract mentions 'two covariant effective black holes' but does not clarify their distinction; this should be stated explicitly in the introduction or metric section.
  2. The notation for quasinormal frequencies and the definition of the effective metric parameters (ζ, Q, Λ) would benefit from a dedicated early subsection for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of our findings on the effects of the quantum parameter ζ. We address the major comment on numerical validation below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results section] The central claims of additional spectral features, damping-rate crossings, and merging-splitting behavior (abstract and results) rest on the pseudo-spectral solver output. No grid-convergence tables, residual norms, or cross-validation with independent methods are provided for the near-extremal parameter values where these delicate phenomena are reported. This is load-bearing for the conclusions about mode interactions and quantum gravity effects.

    Authors: We agree that the delicate features reported near extremality, including damping-rate crossings and merging-splitting, require explicit numerical validation to support the claims about mode interactions and the influence of ζ. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) grid-convergence tables showing the stabilization of the reported frequencies with increasing Chebyshev grid resolution for representative near-extremal values of Q and ζ, (ii) residual norms of the pseudo-spectral discretization for those modes, and (iii) cross-validation of a subset of the near-extremal spectra against an independent implementation of the continued-fraction method. These additions will be placed in a new subsection of the numerical results and will directly address the reliability of the reported spectral phenomena. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct numerical solution of perturbation equations

full rationale

The paper computes quasinormal frequencies by numerically solving the scalar perturbation wave equations on the given covariant effective black hole metric (with parameters ζ, Q, Λ) via the pseudo-spectral method. All reported features—non-monotonic spectra, overtone outbursts, damping-rate crossings, and merging-splitting between complex and imaginary modes—are direct outputs of this solver for chosen parameter values. No step defines a frequency in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or relies on a self-citation chain to force the central claims. The metric background is taken as input from prior literature; the present work performs an independent numerical analysis without reducing any result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central numerical results rest on the validity of the effective spacetime metric incorporating ζ as a quantum correction and the standard assumptions of linear perturbation theory on that background.

free parameters (3)
  • quantum parameter ζ
    Parameter introduced to encode quantum gravity effects in the effective black hole metric; its specific value is varied numerically.
  • charge Q
    Standard electromagnetic charge parameter of the black hole, varied to study its interplay with ζ.
  • cosmological constant Λ
    Standard parameter for spacetime curvature at large distances, included in the model.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The covariant effective metric provides a valid background geometry for studying linear scalar perturbations.
    Invoked as the starting point for deriving the perturbation equations solved numerically.
  • standard math Quasinormal modes are defined by the boundary conditions of ingoing waves at the horizon and outgoing waves at infinity.
    Standard assumption in black hole perturbation theory used to select the discrete frequencies.
invented entities (1)
  • covariant effective black hole with quantum parameter ζ no independent evidence
    purpose: To model quantum gravity corrections to classical charged black hole solutions in the presence of Λ.
    The model is postulated within the effective theory framework; no independent falsifiable prediction for ζ is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1547 out tokens · 44184 ms · 2026-05-10T02:09:25.852630+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    5, we show the real part Re(ω) and the absolute value of the imaginary part|Im(ω)|of the QNFs for the first solution, Eq

    Solution 1 In Fig. 5, we show the real part Re(ω) and the absolute value of the imaginary part|Im(ω)|of the QNFs for the first solution, Eq. (2.2), as functions of the chargeQfor different values of the quantum parameterζ. From panels 5(a) to 5(c), the influ- ence ofζon the QNFs is evident. We first discuss the funda- mental complex modes (n=0), shown in ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (2.3), are shown in Fig

    Solution 2 The results of Solution 2, Eq. (2.3), are shown in Fig. 9. Similarly, we first discuss the fundamental complex modes, which are presented in Fig. 10. Forl=0, similar to Solution 1, the difference in QNFs betweenζ=1 andζ=0 is minor. Both the real part Re(ω) and the absolute value of the imagi- nary part|Im(ω)|exhibit non-monotonic behavior withQ...

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    In addition, Solution 1 has a larger negative region, suggesting increased susceptibility to instability under extreme conditions

    Analysis of the effective potential shows that Solution 1 is more sensitive to quantum corrections, exhibiting a higher potential barrier, whereas Solution 2 shows a weaker response. In addition, Solution 1 has a larger negative region, suggesting increased susceptibility to instability under extreme conditions

    work page

  4. [4]

    Although increasing the cosmological constantΛweak- ens the influence of the quantum parameterζon the quasinormal frequencies, the characteristic features in- troduced byζare still preserved

    work page

  5. [5]

    For the conventional complex modes, only whenζis sufficiently large do the two solutions show signifi- cant differences. For the fundamental modes, whenζ reaches 3, it suppresses the non-monotonic behavior of the QNF spectrum in Solution 1, whereas this suppres- sion is not observed in Solution 2; for the overtones, the quantum gravity effect cannot be si...

    work page

  6. [6]

    For purely imaginary modes, increasingζstrengthens their dominance and accelerates the transition to expo- nential decay. Furthermore, complex and purely imag- inary modes exhibit interactions that generally accom- pany the overtone outbursts in near-extremal regimes, including damping-rate crossings and merging-splitting behavior, which become more frequ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1984), 10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001

    work page doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 1984

  8. [8]

    Liang, B

    C. Liang and B. Zhou,Differential Geometry and General Rel- ativity: V olume 1, translated and revised by W. Jia and B. Zhou (Springer, Singapore, 2023), 10.1007/978-981-99-0022-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0022-0 2023

  9. [9]

    Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-time Singulari- ties, Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-time Singulari- ties, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    work page 1965

  10. [10]

    A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 878 (1968)

    work page 1968

  11. [11]

    Hawking, The occurrence of singularities in cosmology, Proc

    S. Hawking, The occurrence of singularities in cosmology, Proc. R. Soc. A294, 511 (1966)

    work page 1966

  12. [12]

    P. S. Joshi and D. Malafarina, Recent developments in gravita- tional collapse and spacetime singularities, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20, 2641 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum Gen- eral Relativity, Cambridge University Press, 2007, ISBN 978-0-511-75568-2, 978-0-521-84263-1 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755682

    T. Thiemann,Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativ- ity(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511755682

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755682 2007

  14. [14]

    Quantum Gravity

    C. Rovelli,Quantum Gravity(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004), 10.1017/CBO9780511755804

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755804 2004

  15. [15]

    M. Han, Y . Ma, and W. Huang, Fundamental structure of loop quantum gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D16, 1397 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Giesel and H

    K. Giesel and H. Sahlmann, From classical to quantum gravity: Introduction to loop quantum gravity, Proc. Sci. QGQGS2011 (2011) 002

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Yang and Y

    J. Yang and Y . Ma, New volume and inverse volume operators for loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D94, 044003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Yang and Y

    J. Yang and Y . Ma, New Hamiltonian constraint operator for loop quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B751, 343 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    J. Yang, C. Zhang, and Y . Ma, Relating spin-foam to canonical loop quantum gravity by graphical calculus, Phys. Rev. D104, 044025 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Bojowald and K

    M. Bojowald and K. Vandersloot, Loop quantum cosmology, boundary proposals, and inflation, Phys. Rev. D67, 124023 (2003)

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    Tsujikawa, P

    S. Tsujikawa, P. Singh, and R. Maartens, Loop quantum grav- ity effects on inflation and the CMB, Classical Quantum Grav- ity21, 5767 (2004)

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    Bojowald, Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cos- mology, Phys

    M. Bojowald, Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cos- mology, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5227 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Bojowald, Loop quantum cosmology, Living Rev

    M. Bojowald, Loop quantum cosmology, Living Rev. Relativ- 14 ity8, 11 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Ashtekar, M

    A. Ashtekar, M. Bojowald, and J. Lewandowski, Mathemati- cal structure of loop quantum cosmology, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, 233 (2003)

    work page 2003

  25. [25]

    Singh, Are loop quantum cosmos never singular?, Classical Quantum Gravity26, 125005 (2009)

    P. Singh, Are loop quantum cosmos never singular?, Classical Quantum Gravity26, 125005 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum nature of the big bang: An analytical and numerical investigation, Phys. Rev. D73, 124038 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Zhang, Loop quantum black hole, Universe9, 313 (2023)

    X. Zhang, Loop quantum black hole, Universe9, 313 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, Quantum Transfigu- ration of Kruskal Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 241301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y . Ma, S. Song, and X. Zhang, Loop quantum de- parametrized Schwarzschild interior and discrete black hole mass, Phys. Rev. D105, 024069 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Lin and X

    J. Lin and X. Zhang, Effective four-dimensional loop quantum black hole with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D110, 026002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Alonso-Bardaji, D

    A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera, Nonsingular spherically symmetric black-hole model with holonomy cor- rections, Phys. Rev. D106, 024035 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Gambini and J

    R. Gambini and J. Pullin, Loop Quantization of the Schwarzschild Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 211301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Peltola and G

    A. Peltola and G. Kunstatter, Effective polymer dynamics of D-dimensional black hole interiors, Phys. Rev. D80, 044031 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Bojowald, Black-hole models in loop quantum gravity, Universe6, 125 (2020)

    M. Bojowald, Black-hole models in loop quantum gravity, Universe6, 125 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Bojowald, No-go result for covariance in models of loop quantum gravity, Phys

    M. Bojowald, No-go result for covariance in models of loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 046006 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Bojowald, S

    M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, and J. D. Reyes, Covariance in mod- els of loop quantum gravity: Spherical symmetry, Phys. Rev. D92, 045043 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Alonso-Bardaji and D

    A. Alonso-Bardaji and D. Brizuela, Spacetime geometry from canonical spherical gravity, Phys. Rev. D109, 044065 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y . Ma, and J. Yang, Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D111, L081504 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y . Ma, and J. Yang, Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity: A solution with- out Cauchy horizons, Phys. Rev. D112, 044054 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    I. H. Belfaqih, M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, and E. I. Duque, Black holes in effective loop quantum gravity: Covariant holonomy modifications, Phys. Rev. D112, 046022 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Zhang and Z

    C. Zhang and Z. Cao, Covariant Dynamics from Static Spher- ically Symmetric Geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 261401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    J. Yang, C. Zhang, and Y . Ma, Covariant effective spacetimes of spherically symmetric electrovacuum with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D112, 064049 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko, Probing the effective quan- tum gravity via quasinormal modes and shadows of black holes, Phys. Rev. D111, 104055 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B858, 139052 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Liu, M.-Y

    H. Liu, M.-Y . Lai, X.-Y . Pan, H. Huang, and D.-C. Zou, Gravi- tational lensing effect of black holes in effective quantum grav- ity, Phys. Rev. D110, 104039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Y . Wang, A. Vachher, Q. Wu, T. Zhu, and S. G. Ghosh, Strong gravitational lensing by static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Skvortsova, Quantum corrected black holes: testing the correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes, Eur

    M. Skvortsova, Quantum corrected black holes: testing the correspondence between grey-body factors and quasinormal modes, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 854 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Y . Du, Y . Liu, and X. Zhang, Spinning particle dynamics and the innermost stable circular orbit in covariant loop quantum gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 045

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Y . Liu, J. Jiang, and B. Sun, Repulsive effect of covariant ef- fective quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D112, 124042 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    J. Lin, X. Zhang, and M. Bravo-Gaete, Mass inflation and strong cosmic censorship conjecture in the covariant quantum black hole, Phys. Rev. D111, 106025 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Bolokhov, Long lived quasinormal modes in the effective quantum gravity, Eur

    S. Bolokhov, Long lived quasinormal modes in the effective quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1166 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Umarov, F

    D. Umarov, F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, A. Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa, Dynamics of spinning particles around static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 800 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko, Transition from regular black holes to wormholes in covariant effective quantum grav- ity: Scattering, quasinormal modes, and Hawking radiation, Phys. Rev. D111, 084031 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    R.-B. Wang, L. You, S.-J. Ma, J.-B. Deng, and X.-R. Hu, Ther- modynamic phase transition and Joule-Thomson expansion of a quantum corrected black hole in AdS spacetime, Chin. Phys. 49, 115102 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Ai, R.-T

    W.-J. Ai, R.-T. Chen, L.-G. Zhu, and J.-P. Wu, Probing loop quantum effects through solar system experiments: observa- tional signatures and parameter constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 792 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    B. C. L ¨utf¨uo˘glu, Long-lived quasinormal modes around regu- lar black holes and wormholes in Covariant Effective Quantum Gravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2025) 057

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Chen and J

    J. Chen and J. Yang, Periodic orbits and gravitational wave- forms in quantum-corrected black hole spacetimes, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 726 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Liu and X

    Y . Liu and X. Zhang, Quasinormal modes and tidal Love num- bers of covariant effective quantum black holes with cosmo- logical constant, arXiv:2509.12013

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    X. Liu, W. Liu, and S.-M. Wu, Entanglement degradation of static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 875, 140334 (2026)

    work page 2026

  60. [60]

    Calz `a, D

    M. Calz `a, D. Pedrotti, G.-W. Yuan, and S. Vagnozzi, Primor- dial regular black holes as all the dark matter. III. Covariant canonical quantum gravity models, Phys. Rev. D112, 124015 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Motaharfar and P

    M. Motaharfar and P. Singh, Love numbers of covariant loop quantum black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 066008 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Sahlmann and C

    H. Sahlmann and C. Zhang, Dust shell in effective loop quan- tum black hole model, Phys. Rev. D112, 084079 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Du, J.-R

    Y . Du, J.-R. Sun, and X. Zhang, Information paradox and island of covariant black holes in LQG, Phys. Rev. D113, 046017 (2026)

    work page 2026

  64. [64]

    Yao and X

    J.-T. Yao and X. Li, Probing covariant quantum black holes in effective quantum gravity through the orbital motion of the S2 star around Sagittarius A⋆, Phys. Rev. D113, 084003 (2026)

    work page 2026

  65. [65]

    Chen and J

    J. Chen and J. Yang, Electric Penrose process in the space- time of a quantum-corrected Reissner-Nordstr ¨om black hole, arXiv:2601.01508

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Li and J.-H

    Q. Li and J.-H. Huang, Radiation properties and images of loop quantum Reissner-Nordstr ¨om black hole with a thin ac- cretion disk, arXiv:2601.05608

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Particle motions and gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole spacetimes of loop quantum gravity

    Y . Yang, Y .-X. Bai, Y .-Z. Li, and Y . Han, Particle motions and gravitational waveforms in rotating black hole spacetimes of loop quantum gravity, arXiv:2603.25084. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V . Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011)

    work page 2011

  70. [70]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Relativity2, 2 (1999)

    work page 1999

  71. [71]

    Berti, Black hole quasinormal modes: Hints of quantum gravity?, Conf

    E. Berti, Black hole quasinormal modes: Hints of quantum gravity?, Conf. Proc. C0405132, 145 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [72]

    Echeverria, Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole, Phys

    F. Echeverria, Gravitational-wave measurements of the mass and angular momentum of a black hole, Phys. Rev. D40, 3194 (1989)

    work page 1989

  73. [73]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V . Cardoso, and C. M. Will, Gravitational-wave spec- troscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA, Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006)

    work page 2006

  74. [74]

    Berti, J

    E. Berti, J. Cardoso, V . Cardoso, and M. Cavaglia, Matched- filtering and parameter estimation of ringdown waveforms, Phys. Rev. D76, 104044 (2007)

    work page 2007

  75. [75]

    A. G. Abacet al.(KAGRA, Virgo, and LIGO Scientific Col- laborations), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V . Cardoso, and P. Pani, Can environmental ef- fects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    Cardoso, S

    V . Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P. Pani, Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact ob- jects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale, Phys. Rev. D94, 084031 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    Berti, K

    E. Berti, K. Yagi, H. Yang, and N. Yunes, Extreme gravity tests with gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences: (II) Ringdown, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.50, 49 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    G. Fu, D. Zhang, P. Liu, X.-M. Kuang, and J.-P. Wu, Peculiar properties in quasinormal spectra from loop quantum gravity effect, Phys. Rev. D109, 026010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    H. Gong, S. Li, D. Zhang, G. Fu, and J.-P. Wu, Quasinormal modes of quantum-corrected black holes, Phys. Rev. D110, 044040 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.