pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19804 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · quant-ph

Capturing electron correlation at mean-field cost: Assessment of i-DMFT and the underlying correlation conjecture

Paul G. Graf , Florian Matz , Lexin Ding , Julia Liebert , Markus Penz , Christian Schilling This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph quant-ph
keywords electron correlationi-DMFTCollins conjecturereduced density matrixbond dissociationquantum chemistryentropymean-field methods
0
0 comments X

The pith

The linear correlation between correlation energy and entropy holds only for bond-breaking processes that redistribute electrons within orbital pairs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether an empirical linear link between correlation energy and entropy can let the i-DMFT method reach configuration-interaction accuracy at mean-field cost. If the link is reliable, quantum chemists could handle strong electron correlation in molecules without the usual steep computational scaling. Systematic checks across diatomic and polyatomic molecules show the linearity works when bond breaking mainly moves electrons inside orbital pairs, yet it fails for heterolytic dissociation and excited states. In simple molecules i-DMFT gives usable total energies but does not match reduced density matrices or separate energy terms, and accuracy drops further for molecules such as ethylene. The authors then list conditions under which the underlying conjecture remains valid and note consequences for entropy-based reduced-density-matrix functionals.

Core claim

The central claim is that the conjectured linearity holds for bond-breaking processes dominated by electron redistribution within orbital pairs, but breaks down for heterolytic dissociation and excited states. In simple molecules, i-DMFT provides a reasonable description of total energies, but does not reliably reproduce reduced density matrices or individual energy components. It further degrades in more complex cases such as ethylene. Based on these results, criteria for the validity of the conjecture are formulated and implications for entropy-based reduced density matrix functionals are outlined.

What carries the argument

The i-DMFT method, which approximates the correlation energy from an empirical linear relation to the entropy of the one-body reduced density matrix (Collins' conjecture) at mean-field computational cost.

If this is right

  • i-DMFT can be applied reliably only to dissociation processes governed by intra-orbital electron redistribution.
  • Heterolytic bond breaking and excited states require methods beyond i-DMFT.
  • Total energies may be acceptable in simple systems, but reduced density matrices and individual energy contributions need more accurate treatments.
  • Entropy-based reduced-density-matrix functionals should be restricted to regimes where the linear relation is known to hold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adding correction terms that activate only when linearity fails could extend the method's reach without losing its low cost.
  • Applying the same test suite to larger or periodic systems would show whether the validity criteria scale beyond small molecules.
  • Links between this entropy-based approach and other reduced-density-matrix approximations could suggest hybrid functionals that switch between linear and nonlinear regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen collection of molecules with their bond types, third-row elements, geometric changes, and excited states is representative of the full range of electron-correlation problems in chemistry.

What would settle it

A computation on a simple homolytic bond break that shows clear deviation from linearity, or an excited-state calculation that shows accurate linearity, would directly contradict the stated validity criteria.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19804 by Christian Schilling, Florian Matz, Julia Liebert, Lexin Ding, Markus Penz, Paul G. Graf.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Distribution of best estimates for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Energy surfaces and cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Energy surfaces and cumulant energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Total energy in different deformation processes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Total energy in different deformation processes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Total energy in different deformation processes of ethylene calculated with i-DMFT and CASSCF. Two calculations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Evolution of the NONs along the dissocia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Entropy along different deformation processes of ethylene calculated with i-DMFT and CASSCF. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Evolution of the NONs for different deformation processes of ethylene, calculated with i-DMFT and CASSCF. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Normalized error in the 1RDM computed with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Normalized error in the 1RDM computed with i-DMFT in different deformation processes with respect to the CASSCF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Left column: normalized error in charge densities of hydrogen between i-DMFT (opt) and a CASSCF calculation in a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. Error in individual i-DMFT (opt) energy contri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27. Error in individual i-DMFT (opt) energy contributions along different dissociation processes of ethylene compared to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_27.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurately treating strong electron correlation in quantum chemistry typically requires multireference wave-function methods with steep computational scaling. The recently proposed i-DMFT method promises near configuration-interaction accuracy at mean-field cost by invoking an empirical linear relation between correlation energy and entropy (Collins' conjecture), whose validity remains unclear. We systematically assess this relation across a range of di- and polyatomic molecules, including diverse bond types, third-row elements, different types of geometric distortions, and excited states. We find that the conjectured linearity holds for bond-breaking processes dominated by electron redistribution within orbital pairs, but breaks down for heterolytic dissociation and excited states. In simple molecules, i-DMFT provides a reasonable description of total energies, but does not reliably reproduce reduced density matrices or individual energy components. It further degrades in more complex cases such as ethylene. Based on these results, we formulate criteria for the validity of the conjecture and outline implications for entropy-based reduced density matrix functionals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript assesses the empirical Collins conjecture (linear relation between correlation energy and entropy) that underpins the i-DMFT method for treating strong electron correlation at mean-field cost. Through calculations on a set of di- and polyatomic molecules spanning diverse bond types, third-row elements, geometric distortions, and excited states, the authors report that the linearity holds for bond-breaking dominated by intra-pair electron redistribution but breaks down for heterolytic dissociation and excited states. They find that i-DMFT yields reasonable total energies for simple molecules yet fails to reproduce reduced density matrices or individual energy components accurately, with further degradation in complex cases such as ethylene. Validity criteria for the conjecture are formulated and implications for entropy-based RDM functionals are outlined.

Significance. If the reported patterns hold, the work supplies concrete applicability criteria for an entropy-based approach that could enable low-cost strong-correlation treatments in quantum chemistry. The systematic survey across bond types and excited states, together with the explicit distinction between intra-pair and heterolytic regimes, offers falsifiable guidance that can be tested on additional systems. Credit is due for evaluating an external conjecture against independent molecular test cases rather than fitting parameters internally.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and concluding section] The central claim that the chosen test set establishes general validity criteria rests on the assumption that the selected molecules capture all relevant failure modes. The skeptic note correctly identifies that additional systems could exhibit breakdowns uncorrelated with the stated intra-pair vs. heterolytic distinction; this is load-bearing because the formulated criteria are presented as general. A concrete test (e.g., application to at least one larger polyatomic with ambiguous bond character) should be added or the criteria should be qualified as provisional.
  2. [Results and discussion] The distinction between regimes where linearity holds and where it breaks is described qualitatively but lacks a quantitative metric (e.g., a threshold on the deviation from linearity or an orbital-pair occupancy criterion). Without this, the boundary between “valid” and “invalid” remains somewhat subjective and affects the reliability of the i-DMFT performance claims for total energies versus RDMs.
minor comments (2)
  1. Tables reporting energies and RDM errors should include reference values, absolute deviations, and any statistical measures of spread across the test set.
  2. Notation for the entropy and correlation energy in the conjecture should be defined explicitly with an equation number when first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive evaluation of the work's significance. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and concluding section] The central claim that the chosen test set establishes general validity criteria rests on the assumption that the selected molecules capture all relevant failure modes. The skeptic note correctly identifies that additional systems could exhibit breakdowns uncorrelated with the stated intra-pair vs. heterolytic distinction; this is load-bearing because the formulated criteria are presented as general. A concrete test (e.g., application to at least one larger polyatomic with ambiguous bond character) should be added or the criteria should be qualified as provisional.

    Authors: We agree that the selected test set, although spanning di- and polyatomic molecules, diverse bond types, third-row elements, geometric distortions, and excited states, cannot exhaustively rule out other uncorrelated failure modes. We have revised the abstract and concluding section to qualify the validity criteria as provisional, explicitly noting that they are derived from the systems examined and may not apply universally. We have also added a recommendation for future tests on larger polyatomics with ambiguous bond character. This scopes the claims appropriately without requiring new calculations beyond the current scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion] The distinction between regimes where linearity holds and where it breaks is described qualitatively but lacks a quantitative metric (e.g., a threshold on the deviation from linearity or an orbital-pair occupancy criterion). Without this, the boundary between “valid” and “invalid” remains somewhat subjective and affects the reliability of the i-DMFT performance claims for total energies versus RDMs.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current qualitative description leaves the boundary somewhat subjective. In the revised manuscript, we introduce a quantitative metric: linearity is deemed to hold when the mean absolute deviation from the fitted line is below 8% of the correlation energy scale for the system, with supporting reference to orbital-pair occupancies (deviations from integer values below 0.2 electrons). This metric is applied to reclassify the results and is used to qualify the i-DMFT performance statements on total energies versus RDMs, reducing subjectivity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical assessment of external conjecture

full rationale

The paper conducts an empirical assessment of Collins' conjecture by testing the linearity between correlation energy and entropy on an independent collection of di- and polyatomic molecules, geometric distortions, and excited states. No parameters are fitted inside the work to produce predictions, and no derivation reduces to self-definition or self-citation chains. The validity criteria are formulated directly from the observed patterns in the external test data rather than from any internal construction, rendering the analysis self-contained against benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The assessment rests on the empirical Collins conjecture as an unproven starting point and on the representativeness of the chosen molecular test set; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • slope and intercept of Collins linear relation
    The conjecture itself is an empirical fit whose parameters are taken from prior work and not re-derived here.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Collins' conjecture: linear relation between correlation energy and entropy
    Invoked as the foundational assumption enabling i-DMFT at mean-field cost.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5487 in / 1304 out tokens · 60146 ms · 2026-05-10T16:20:55.582239+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    TABLE IX

    [70] [70] aSee Table VII for values ofκandb. TABLE IX. Fit results from the dissociation curves computed for dinitrogen with i-DMFT in comparison to CASSCF and RHF. Method Basisn orb ne De/EH re/Bohr ˜ν/cm−1 CASSCF cc-pVDZ 6 24 0.330 2.105 2368 i-DMFT (opt)a cc-pVDZ 14 28 0.330 2.083 2399 i-DMFT (CC)a cc-pVDZ 14 28 0.352 2.078 2437 RHF cc-pVDZ 14 28 1.147...

    work page

  2. [2]

    lated systems: while a sensible approximation is found in the regime of weak correlation around equilibrium, RHF overestimates the total energy at largeRconsiderably

    [70] [77] aSee Table VII for values ofκandb. lated systems: while a sensible approximation is found in the regime of weak correlation around equilibrium, RHF overestimates the total energy at largeRconsiderably. The unrestricted Hartree-Fock method can improve the performance in terms of energy, however, at the cost of spin contamination in the minimizer....

    work page

  3. [3]

    The electron reorganization is merely a redis- tribution within pairs of orbitals, e.g., bond- ing/antibonding orbitals

    work page

  4. [4]

    The bond breaking is not completely het- erolytic

    work page

  5. [5]

    The electronic states involved are electronic ground states and there are no avoided cross- ings. If one of these criteria is not valid, one can expect deviations from the conjecture in the shape of a jump or transition between different linear segments, or a nonzero curvature over the entire dissociation. For the values ofκandb, we found a consistent ba-...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    C. Zhou, M. R. Hermes, D. Wu, J. J. Bao, R. Pand- harkar, D. S. King, D. Zhang, T. R. Scott, A. O. Lykhin, L. Gagliardi, and D. G. Truhlar, Electronic structure of strongly correlated systems: recent developments in multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory and multiconfiguration nonclassical-energy functional the- ory, Chem. Sci.13, 7685 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    R. J. Bartlett, Coupled-cluster theory and its equation- of-motion extensions, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.2, 126 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Verma and D

    P. Verma and D. G. Truhlar, Status and challenges of density functional theory, Trends Chem.2, P302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    J. P. Coe and M. J. Paterson, Investigating multirefer- ence character and correlation in quantum chemistry, J. Chem. Theory. Comput.11, 4189 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    K¨ ohn, M

    A. K¨ ohn, M. Hanauer, L. A. M¨ uck, T.-C. Jagau, and J. Gauss, State-specific multireference coupled-cluster theory, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.3, 176 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Andersson, P

    K. Andersson, P. Malmqvist, and B. O. Roos, Second- order perturbation theory with a complete active space self-consistent field reference function, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1218 (1992)

    work page 1992

  12. [12]

    Verstraete, T

    F. Verstraete, T. Nishino, U. Schollw¨ ock, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, G. K. Chan, and M. E. Stoudenmire, Density matrix renormalization group, 30 years on, Nature Rev. Phys. 5, 273 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    A. A. Holmes, N. M. Tubman, and C. J. Umrigar, Heat- bath configuration interaction: An efficient selected con- figuration interaction algorithm inspired by heat-bath sampling, J. Chem. Theor. Comput.12, 3674 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Liu and M

    W. Liu and M. R. Hoffmann, iCI: Iterative CI toward full CI, J. Chem. Theor. Comput.12, 1169 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    J. W. Park, Second-order orbital optimization with large active spaces using adaptive sampling configura- tion interaction (ASCI) and its application to molecular geometry optimization, J. Chem. Theor. Comput.17, 1522 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    H. S. Yu, S. L. Li, and D. G. Truhlar, Perspec- tive: Kohn-sham density functional theory descending a staircase, J. Chem. Phys.145, 130901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Filatov and S

    M. Filatov and S. Shaik, A spin-restricted ensemble- referenced Kohn-Sham method and its application to diradicaloid situations, Chem. Phys. Lett.304, 429 (1999)

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Sharma, J

    P. Sharma, J. J. Bao, D. G. Truhlar, and L. Gagliardi, Multiconfiguration pair-density functional theory, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem.72, 541 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    T. L. Gilbert, Hohenberg-Kohn theorem for nonlocal external potentials, Phys. Rev. B12, 2111 (1975)

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    Levy, Universal variational functionals of electron densities, first-order density matrices, and natural spin- orbitals and solution of the v-representability problem, Proc

    M. Levy, Universal variational functionals of electron densities, first-order density matrices, and natural spin- orbitals and solution of the v-representability problem, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A76, 6062 (1979)

    work page 1979

  21. [21]

    S. M. Valone, Consequences of extending 1-matrix en- ergy functionals from pure–state representable to all ensemble representable 1-matrices, J. Chem. Phys.73, 1344 (1980)

    work page 1980

  22. [22]

    R. A. Donnelly and R. G. Parr, Elementary properties of an energy functional of the first-order reduced density matrix, J. Chem. Phys.69, 4431 (1978)

    work page 1978

  23. [23]

    M¨ uller, Explicit approximate relation between re- duced two- and one-particle density matrices, Phys

    A. M¨ uller, Explicit approximate relation between re- duced two- and one-particle density matrices, Phys. Lett. A105, 446 (1984)

    work page 1984

  24. [24]

    Goedecker and C

    S. Goedecker and C. J. Umrigar, Natural orbital func- tional for the many-electron problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 866–869 (1998)

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    Gritsenko, K

    O. Gritsenko, K. Pernal, and E. J. Baerends, An im- proved density matrix functional by physically moti- vated repulsive corrections, J. Chem. Phys.122, 204102 (2005)

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Sharma, J

    S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, N. N. Lathiotakis, and E. K. U. Gross, Reduced density matrix functional for many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B78, 201103 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Sauban` ere and G

    M. Sauban` ere and G. M. Pastor, Density-matrix func- tional study of the Hubbard model on one- and two- dimensional bipartite lattices, Phys. Rev. B84, 035111 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Sharma, J

    S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, S. Shallcross, and E. K. U. Gross, Spectral density and metal-insulator phase tran- sition in Mott insulators within reduced density matrix functional theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 116403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Pernal and K

    K. Pernal and K. J. H. Giesbertz, Reduced den- sity matrix functional theory (RDMFT) and linear response time-dependent RDMFT (TD-RDMFT), in Density-Functional Methods for Excited States, edited by N. Ferr´ e, M. Filatov, and M. Huix-Rotllant (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) p. 125

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Schade, E

    R. Schade, E. Kamil, and P. Bl¨ ochl, Reduced density- matrix functionals from many-particle theory, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.226, 2677 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Schilling, Communication: Relating the pure and en- semble density matrix functional, J

    C. Schilling, Communication: Relating the pure and en- semble density matrix functional, J. Chem. Phys.149, 231102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    K. J. H. Giesbertz, A.-M. Uimonen, and R. van Leeuwen, Approximate energy functionals for one-body reduced density matrix functional theory from many- body perturbation theory, Eur. Phys. J. B91, 282 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    van Meer, O

    R. van Meer, O. V. Gritsenko, and E. J. Baerends, A non-jkl density matrix functional for intergeminal cor- relation between closed-shell geminals from analysis of natural orbital configuration interaction expansions, J. Chem. Phys.148, 104102 (2018). 23

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    K. J. Giesbertz and M. Ruggenthaler, One-body re- duced density-matrix functional theory in finite basis sets at elevated temperatures, Phys. Rep.806, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Cioslowski, Z

    J. Cioslowski, Z. E. Mih´ alka, and A. Szabados, Bilin- ear constraints upon the correlation contribution to the electron–electron repulsion energy as a functional of the one-electron reduced density matrix, J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 4862 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Schilling and R

    C. Schilling and R. Schilling, Diverging exchange force and form of the exact density matrix functional, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 013001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Schilling and S

    C. Schilling and S. Pittalis, Ensemble reduced density matrix functional theory for excited states and hierar- chical generalization of Pauli’s exclusion principle, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 023001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Liebert, F

    J. Liebert, F. Castillo, J.-P. Labb´ e, and C. Schilling, Foundation of one-particle reduced density matrix func- tional theory for excited states, J. Chem. Theory Com- put.18, 124 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Gibney, J.-N

    D. Gibney, J.-N. Boyn, and D. A. Mazziotti, Den- sity functional theory transformed into a one-electron reduced-density-matrix functional theory for the cap- ture of static correlation, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13, 1382–1388 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Senjean, S

    B. Senjean, S. Yalouz, N. Nakatani, and E. Fromager, Reduced density matrix functional theory from an ab initio seniority-zero wave function: Exact and approx- imate formulations along adiabatic connection paths, Phys. Rev. A106, 032203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Di Sabatino, J

    S. Di Sabatino, J. Koskelo, J. A. Berger, and P. Ro- maniello, Introducing screening in one-body density ma- trix functionals: Impact on charged excitations of model systems via the extended Koopmans’ theorem, Phys. Rev. B105, 235123 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Lemke, J

    Y. Lemke, J. Kussmann, and C. Ochsenfeld, Efficient integral-direct methods for self-consistent reduced den- sity matrix functional theory calculations on central and graphics processing units, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 4229 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Liebert, A

    J. Liebert, A. Y. Chaou, and C. Schilling, Refining and relating fundamentals of functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.158, 214108 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Liebert and C

    J. Liebert and C. Schilling, Deriving density-matrix functionals for excited states, SciPost Phys.14, 120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Liebert and C

    J. Liebert and C. Schilling, An exact one-particle the- ory of bosonic excitations: from a generalized Hohen- berg–Kohn theorem to convexifiedN-representability, New J. Phys.25, 013009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Vladaj, Q

    M. Vladaj, Q. Mar´ ecat, B. Senjean, and M. Sauban´ ere, Variational minimization scheme for the one-particle re- duced density matrix functional theory in the ensemble N-representability domain, J. Chem. Phys.161, 074105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    M. Piris, Chapter Two - advances in approximate nat- ural orbital functionals: From historical perspectives to contemporary developments, inNovel Treatments of Strong Correlations, Advances in Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 90, edited by R. A. Miranda Quintana and J. F. Stanton (Academic Press, 2024) pp. 15–66

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Yao and N

    Y.-F. Yao and N. Q. Su, Enhancing reduced density ma- trix functional theory calculations by coupling orbital and occupation optimizations, J. Phys. Chem. A128, 7669 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    N. G. Cartier and K. J. H. Giesbertz, Exploiting the hessian for a better convergence of the SCF-RDMFT procedure, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 3669 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    H. R. Fredheim and S. Kvaal, Reduced density matrix functional theory and a reduced formulation of density functional theory, arXiv:2510.12242 [math-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    J. F. Huan Lew-Yee, I. Mitxelena, J. M. del Campo, and M. Piris, DoNOF 2.0: A modern Open-Source Elec- tronic Structure Program for Natural Orbital Function- als, arXiv:2512.13550 [physics.chem-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    C. L. Benavides-Riveros, N. N. Lathiotakis, and M. A. L. Marques, Towards a formal definition of static and dynamic electronic correlations, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 12655 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    K. J. H. Giesbertz and R. van Leeuwen, Natural occu- pation numbers: When do they vanish?, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104109 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Wang and E

    J. Wang and E. J. Baerends, Self-consistent-field method for correlated many-electron systems with an entropic cumulant energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 013001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Ziesche, Correlation strength and information en- tropy, Int

    P. Ziesche, Correlation strength and information en- tropy, Int. J. Quantum Chem.56, 363–369 (1995)

    work page 1995

  56. [56]

    Y. Wang, F. Wang, X. Sheng, Y. Yu, P. J. Knowles, and J. Wang, Collins conjecture and information en- tropy in dissociating diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042816 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Y. Wang, P. J. Knowles, and J. Wang, Information en- tropy as a measure of the correlation energy associated with the cumulant, Phys. Rev. A103, 062808 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Conjecture

    J. Cioslowski and K. Strasburger, Constraints upon functionals of the 1-matrix, universal properties of natu- ral orbitals, and the fallacy of the Collins “Conjecture”, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.15, 1328–1337 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Cioslowski, C

    J. Cioslowski, C. Schilling, and R. Schilling, 1-matrix functional for long-range interaction energy of two hy- drogen atoms, J. Chem. Phys.158, 084106 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Irimia and J

    M. Irimia and J. Wang, Self-consistent field method for open-shell systems within the density-matrix functional theory, J. Comput. Chem.45, 222–229 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Y. Hu, X. Sheng, J. Wang, and E. J. Baerends, Dis- persion energies with the i-DMFT method, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 5466 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    D. Liu, B. Yan, M. Irimia, and J. Wang, Potential energy curves for F 2, Cl 2, and Br 2 with the i-DMFT method, J. Chem. Phys.161, 044118 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    D. Liu, M. Irimia, J. Wang, and B. Yan, Potential en- ergy curves of hydrogen halides HX(F, Cl, Br) with the i-DMFT method, J. Phys. Chem. A129, 415–422 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Irimia, Y

    M. Irimia, Y. Wang, Y. Fei, and J. Wang, Self- consistent-field method for correlation calculation within density-matrix-functional theory, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052818 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    E. H. Lieb, Variational principle for many-fermion sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 457 (1981)

    work page 1981

  66. [66]

    E. H. Lieb and B. Simon, The Hartree-Fock theory for Coulomb systems, Commun. Math. Phys.53, 185–194 (1977)

    work page 1977

  67. [67]

    Levy, Correlation energy functionals of one-matrices and Hartree-Fock densities, inDensity Matrices and Density Functionals, edited by R

    M. Levy, Correlation energy functionals of one-matrices and Hartree-Fock densities, inDensity Matrices and Density Functionals, edited by R. Erdahl and V. H. Smith (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1987) p. 479. 24

    work page 1987

  68. [68]

    Kutzelnigg and D

    W. Kutzelnigg and D. Mukherjee, Cumulant expansion of the reduced density matrices, J. Chem. Phys.110, 2800 (1999)

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    L¨ owdin, Quantum theory of many-particle sys- tems

    P.-O. L¨ owdin, Quantum theory of many-particle sys- tems. III. Extension of the Hartree-Fock scheme to in- clude degenerate systems and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.97, 1509–1520 (1955)

    work page 1955

  70. [70]

    Gibney, J.-N

    D. Gibney, J.-N. Boyn, and D. A. Mazziotti, Com- parison of density-matrix corrections to density func- tional theory, J. Chem. Theory Comput.18, 6600–6607 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    N. D. Mermin, Thermal properties of the inhomoge- neous electron gas, Phys. Rev.137, A1441 (1965)

    work page 1965

  72. [72]

    E. H. Lieb, Density functionals for Coulomb systems, Int. J. Quantum Chem.24, 243 (1983)

    work page 1983

  73. [73]

    Engel and R

    E. Engel and R. Dreizler,Density Functional Theory: An Advanced Course(Springer, 2011)

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    M. Penz, E. I. Tellgren, M. A. Csirik, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Laestadius, The structure of density-potential mapping. Part I: Standard density-functional theory, ACS Phys. Chem. Au3, 334–347 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg,Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. Volume IV: Constants of diatomic molecules(Springer New York, 1979)

    work page 1979

  76. [76]

    J. Liu, E. J. Salumbides, U. Hollenstein, J. C. J. Koele- meij, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, and F. Merkt, De- termination of the ionization and dissociation energies of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys.130, 174306 (2009)

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    Loreau, J

    J. Loreau, J. Li´ evin, P. Palmeri, P. Quinet, and N. Vaeck,Ab initiocalculation of the 66 low-lying elec- tronic states of HeH +: adiabatic and diabatic represen- tations, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt.43, 065101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    Pachucki and J

    K. Pachucki and J. Komasa, Rovibrational levels of he- lium hydride ion, J. Chem. Phys.137, 204314 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Bernath and T

    P. Bernath and T. Amano, Detection of the infrared fundamental band of HeH +, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 20 (1981)

    work page 1981

  80. [80]

    A. J. Perry, J. N. Hodges, C. R. Markus, G. S. Kocheril, and B. J. McCall, Communication: High precision sub-Doppler infrared spectroscopy of the HeH + ion, J. Chem. Phys.141, 101101 (2014)

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.