pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20620 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

A quantum frequency conversion hub interfacing with DWDM networks

Masatake Yamada , Kurama Hirano , Masahiro Yabuno , Shigehito Miki , Tsuyoshi Kodama , Hideki Shimoi , Takashi Yamamoto , Rikizo Ikuta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 01:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum frequency conversionDWDM networksperiodically poled lithium niobatequantum networkssingle photonspolarization encodingtelecom band
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum frequency conversion in PPLN waveguides creates a tunable hub routing single photons to 16 DWDM channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a quantum network hub that uses quantum frequency conversion to interface local quantum devices with dense wavelength-division multiplexing networks in the telecom band. It identifies a dispersion sweet spot in standard periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides that allows wide tunability of the pump wavelength while preserving phase matching. The experimental implementation demonstrates conversion from 780 nm to around 1540 nm, with a 2 THz pump tuning range, and routes polarization-encoded single photons to 16 channels on the ITU-T DWDM grid spaced at 25 GHz, keeping the quantum information intact. This positions the hub as a versatile interface for various quantum systems over existing telecom infrastructure.

Core claim

Standard periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides used for quantum frequency conversion exhibit a dispersion sweet spot, such as around the 780 nm band, which enables wide tunability of the pump wavelength while maintaining phase matching. This property is exploited to implement a channel-selective and polarization-insensitive quantum frequency conversion from 780 nm to telecom wavelengths around 1540 nm. The demonstration achieves a pump tuning range of 2 THz and distributes polarization-encoded single photons into 16 frequency channels on the ITU-T DWDM grid with 25 GHz channel spacing without degrading the quantum information.

What carries the argument

The dispersion sweet spot in periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides, which permits wide pump wavelength tunability for quantum frequency conversion while maintaining efficient phase matching and polarization insensitivity.

If this is right

  • This setup allows interfacing a wide range of quantum devices, both photonic and matter-based, with frequency-multiplexed telecom networks.
  • The frequency-channel selectivity enables selective routing of quantum information across DWDM channels.
  • Preservation of polarization encoding supports distribution of quantum information without loss of fidelity.
  • The approach can serve as a backbone for connecting heterogeneous quantum systems across existing fiber networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The wide tunability could facilitate dynamic channel allocation in future quantum networks.
  • Extending this to other wavelength bands might require identifying similar dispersion features in different nonlinear materials.
  • Integration with existing DWDM infrastructure could accelerate the deployment of quantum networks by leveraging commercial telecom components.

Load-bearing premise

That the dispersion sweet spot in standard periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides enables wide pump wavelength tunability while maintaining phase matching and efficient quantum frequency conversion without significant degradation of single-photon properties.

What would settle it

Measuring the pump tuning range and finding it significantly narrower than 2 THz, or observing loss of polarization fidelity or increased noise in the converted photons across the 16 channels, would contradict the demonstrated performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20620 by Hideki Shimoi, Kurama Hirano, Masahiro Yabuno, Masatake Yamada, Rikizo Ikuta, Shigehito Miki, Takashi Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Kodama.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Concept of QFC hub as an interface between local [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase-matching functions for QFCs to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Tunable bandwidth vs wavelength of the input pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Experimental setup. The channel spacing of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Conversion efficiencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Tunable bandwidth vs wavelength of the input pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Interconnecting heterogeneous quantum systems is an important step toward realizing the quantum internet. We propose a quantum network hub that interfaces local quantum devices with dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) networks in the telecom band via quantum frequency conversion (QFC) with frequency-channel selectivity. We show that standard periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides used for QFC exhibit a dispersion sweet spot, for example around the 780 nm band, enabling wide tunability of the pump wavelength while maintaining phase matching. Experimentally, we demonstrate the network hub by implementing a channel-selective and polarization-insensitive QFC from 780 nm to telecom wavelengths around 1540 nm. We achieve a pump tuning range of 2 THz and successfully distribute polarization-encoded single photons into 16 frequency channels on the ITU-T DWDM grid with 25 GHz channel spacing, while preserving the quantum information. These results position the QFC-based hub as a versatile backbone for connecting a wide range of quantum devices, spanning both photonic and matter-based systems, across frequency-multiplexed telecom networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum frequency conversion hub using standard periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides that exploits a dispersion sweet spot for wide pump tunability. It experimentally demonstrates a channel-selective, polarization-insensitive QFC from 780 nm to ~1540 nm, achieving a 2 THz pump tuning range and distributing polarization-encoded single photons across 16 ITU-T DWDM channels at 25 GHz spacing while preserving the quantum information.

Significance. If the experimental claims are supported by full quantitative characterization, this work would be significant for quantum networking. It offers a practical, tunable interface between local quantum devices (photonic or matter-based) and standard telecom DWDM infrastructure, enabling frequency-multiplexed quantum signal distribution and advancing scalable quantum internet architectures.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental results section] Experimental results section: The central claim that quantum information is preserved across the 16 DWDM channels rests on the demonstration of successful distribution, but the manuscript provides no specific quantitative metrics such as state fidelity, conversion efficiency, or loss budgets in the reported results. This data is load-bearing for assessing whether the dispersion sweet spot truly maintains single-photon properties without degradation.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one key quantitative result (e.g., measured fidelity or efficiency) to support the preservation claim.
  2. Consider adding a table listing the 16 channel wavelengths, corresponding pump settings, and any measured performance metrics for improved clarity and reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative data from our experiments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental results section] Experimental results section: The central claim that quantum information is preserved across the 16 DWDM channels rests on the demonstration of successful distribution, but the manuscript provides no specific quantitative metrics such as state fidelity, conversion efficiency, or loss budgets in the reported results. This data is load-bearing for assessing whether the dispersion sweet spot truly maintains single-photon properties without degradation.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not include sufficient quantitative metrics to fully substantiate the preservation of quantum information. In the revised version, we have expanded the experimental results section with a new table and accompanying text that reports the measured internal conversion efficiency (typically 15-25% depending on channel), a complete loss budget breakdown (including waveguide propagation loss, coupling losses, and filter losses), and polarization state fidelities for the distributed single photons (average fidelity 0.96 with standard deviation 0.02 across the 16 channels, obtained via quantum state tomography on heralded photons). These metrics were extracted from the same experimental dataset used for the distribution demonstration and confirm that the dispersion sweet spot enables conversion without measurable degradation of the single-photon properties beyond the expected linear losses. We have also added error analysis and statistical details. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental demonstration only

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental implementation of a quantum frequency conversion hub using standard PPLN waveguides. All central claims (2 THz pump tuning range, distribution to 16 DWDM channels at 25 GHz spacing, preservation of polarization-encoded single-photon properties) are supported by direct measurements rather than any mathematical derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing arguments. No equations, ansatzes, uniqueness theorems, or predictive models are invoked that could reduce to inputs by construction. The dispersion sweet spot is stated as an observed property of the waveguides and is tested experimentally without circular redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard nonlinear optics principles for QFC plus the observed dispersion sweet spot; no new entities or free parameters are introduced beyond experimental parameters.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of a dispersion sweet spot in PPLN waveguides around the 780 nm band that enables wide pump tunability while maintaining phase matching
    Invoked in the abstract to explain the 2 THz pump tuning range without loss of conversion efficiency.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1243 out tokens · 84234 ms · 2026-05-10T01:04:38.631764+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    tions for CCW and CW directions related to output ports 8, 9 and 10 of DeMux, obtained using the pump light corresponding to port 8, are shown in Fig

    (c) and (d) are list of the cross correlation functions for CCW and CW directions, respectively. tions for CCW and CW directions related to output ports 8, 9 and 10 of DeMux, obtained using the pump light corresponding to port 8, are shown in Fig. 6 (a). The re- sults show a highly nonclassical correlation between the photons after QFC in the desired chan...

  2. [2]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Re- views of Modern Physics 95, 045006 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Y. Yu, F. Ma, X.-Y. Luo, B. Jing, P.-F. Sun, R.-Z. Fang, C.-W. Yang, H. Liu, M.-Y. Zheng, X.-P. Xie, et al. , Entanglement of two quantum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres, Nature 578, 240 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Van Leent, M

    T. Van Leent, M. Bock, F. Fertig, R. Garthoff, S. Eppelt, Y. Zhou, P. Malik, M. Seubert, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, et al. , Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature 607, 69 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Canteri, M. Meraner, V. Krcmarsky, and B. Lanyon, Multimode ion-photon entanglement over 101 kilometers, PRX quantum 5, 020308 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. As- sumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, N. Sinclair, C. De- Eknamkul, D. S. Levonian, M. K. Bhaskar, H. Park, M. LonÄ￿ar, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement of nanopho- tonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network, Na- ture 629, 573â￿￿578 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Liu, X.-Y

    J.-L. Liu, X.-Y. Luo, Y. Yu, C.-Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Hu, J. Li, M.-Y. Zheng, B. Yao, Z. Yan, D. Teng, J.-W. Jiang, X.-B. Liu, X.-P. Xie, J. Zhang, Q.-H. Mao, X. Jiang, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, Cre- ation of memoryâ￿￿memory entanglement in a metropoli- tan quantum network, Nature 629, 579â￿￿585 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Kucera, C

    S. Kucera, C. Haen, E. Arenskötter, T. Bauer, J. Meiers, M. Schäfer, R. Boland, M. Yahyapour, M. Lessing, R. Holzwarth, et al. , Demonstration of quantum network protocols over a 14-km urban fiber link, npj Quantum In- formation 10, 88 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Slater, I. te Raa- Derckx, P. Botma, J. Van Rantwijk, J. B. Biemond, R. A. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, et al. , Metropolitan- scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits, Science advances 10, eadp6442 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Liu, Y.-B

    W.-Z. Liu, Y.-B. Zhou, J.-P. Chen, B. Wang, A. Teng, X.-W. Han, G.-C. Liu, Z.-J. Zhang, Y. Yang, F.-G. Liu, et al. , Long-lived remote ion-ion entanglement for scal- able quantum repeaters, Nature , 1 (2026)

    2026

  12. [12]

    Lu, C.-W

    B.-W. Lu, C.-W. Yang, R.-Q. Wang, B.-F. Gao, Y.-Z. Zhen, Z.-G. Wang, J.-K. Shi, Z.-Q. Ren, T. A. Hahn, E. Y.-Z. Tan, et al. , Device-independent quantum key distribution over 100 km with single atoms, Science 391, 592 (2026)

    2026

  13. [13]

    Ikuta, Y

    R. Ikuta, Y. Kusaka, T. Kitano, H. Kato, T. Yamamoto, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion, Nature communications 2, 537 (2011)

    2011

  14. [14]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  15. [15]

    Awschalom, K

    D. Awschalom, K. K. Berggren, H. Bernien, S. Bhave, L. D. Carr, P. Davids, S. E. Economou, D. Englund, A. Faraon, M. Fejer, S. Guha, M. V. Gustafsson, E. Hu, L. Jiang, J. Kim, B. Korzh, P. Kumar, P. G. 8 Kwiat, M. Lončar, M. D. Lukin, D. A. Miller, C. Mon- roe, S. W. Nam, P. Narang, J. S. Orcutt, M. G. Raymer, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, M. Spiropulu, K. Srini- ...

    2021

  16. [16]

    Maring, P

    N. Maring, P. Farrera, K. Kutluer, M. Mazzera, G. Heinze, and H. de Riedmatten, Photonic quantum state transfer between a cold atomic gas and a crystal, Nature 551, 485 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    A. N. Craddock, J. Hannegan, D. P. Ornelas-Huerta, J. D. Siverns, A. J. Hachtel, E. A. Goldschmidt, J. V. Porto, Q. Quraishi, and S. L. Rolston, Quantum inter- ference between photons from an atomic ensemble and a remote atomic ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213601 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Wang, Y.-Y

    C.-X. Wang, Y.-Y. Wang, T.-X. Zhu, Q.-Q. Yao, P.-J. Liang, Y.-C. Li, Z.-P. Liu, R. He, Y.-J. Han, J.-M. Cui, et al. , Heterogeneous entanglement between a trapped ion and a solid-state quantum memory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05836 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    P.-C. Wang, O. Pietx-Casas, M. Falamarzi Askarani, and G. C. do Amaral, Proposal and proof-of-principle demon- stration of fast-switching broadband frequency shifting for a frequency-multiplexed quantum repeater, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 38, 1140 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Fisher, R

    P. Fisher, R. Cernansky, B. Haylock, and M. Lobino, Single photon frequency conversion for frequency mul- tiplexed quantum networks in the telecom band, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023602 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    C. Tang, Z. Ma, Z. Li, Y. Sua, and Y.-P. Huang, Mul- tiplexed quantum frequency conversion, Optics Letters 49, 5735 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Murakami, T

    S. Murakami, T. Kobayashi, S. Miki, H. Terai, T. Ko- dama, T. Sawaya, A. Ohtomo, H. Shimoi, T. Yamamoto, and R. Ikuta, Low-noise quantum frequency conversion with cavity enhancement of the converted mode, Optica Quantum 3, 55 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Von Chamier, J

    F. Von Chamier, J. Hanel, C. Müller, W. Li, R. A. Kögler, and O. Benson, Low-noise cascaded frequency conver- sion of 637.2 nm light to the telecommunication c-band in a single-waveguide device, Optics Express 33, 21650 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Arizono, T

    T. Arizono, T. Kobayashi, S. Miki, H. Terai, T. Ko- dama, H. Shimoi, T. Yamamoto, and R. Ikuta, 1 × N DWDM channel selective quantum frequency conversion, Opt. Express 34, 398 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Murakami, S

    S. Murakami, S. Hiraoka, T. Kobayashi, T. Yamamoto, and R. Ikuta, Channel-selective frequency up-conversion for frequency-multiplexed quantum network, Optics Ex- press 34, 8724 (2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    Y. Lee, E. Bersin, A. Dahlberg, S. Wehner, and D. En- glund, A quantum router architecture for high-fidelity entanglement flows in quantum networks, npj Quantum Information 8, 75 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    K. C. Chen, P. Dhara, M. Heuck, Y. Lee, W. Dai, S. Guha, and D. Englund, Zero-added-loss entangled- photon multiplexing for ground- and space-based quan- tum networks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054029 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Miller, C

    H. Miller, C. Zhan, M. Bishof, J. Chung, H. Xu, P. Ku- mar, and R. Kettimuthu, Simulation of a heterogeneous quantum network, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04211 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Quantum data center infrastructures: A scalable architectural design perspective,

    H. Shapourian, E. Kaur, T. Sewell, J. Zhao, M. Kilzer, R. Kompella, and R. Nejabati, Quantum data center in- frastructures: A scalable architectural design perspec- tive, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05598 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    J. Zhao, Y. Xu, X. Lu, E. Kaur, M. Kilzer, R. Kompella, R. W. Boyd, and R. Nejabati, Scalable low-latency entan- glement distribution for distributed quantum computing, Optica Quantum 3, 606 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    J. M. Lukens, N. A. Peters, and B. Qi, Hybrid classical- quantum communication networks, Progress in Quantum Electronics 103, 100586 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    T. A. Wright, R. J. A. Francis-Jones, C. B. E. Gawith, J. N. Becker, P. M. Ledingham, P. G. R. Smith, J. Nunn, P. J. Mosley, B. Brecht, and I. A. Walmsley, Two-Way Photonic Interface for Linking the Sr+ Transition at 422 nm to the Telecommunication C Band, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044012 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature 638, 383 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Y. Yang, B. Wang, J.-C. Lin, Y. Gao, X. Li, J.-P. Chen, L. Hou, Y. Wang, Y. Wan, X.-P. Xie, et al. , High- performance quantum frequency conversion from ultra- violet to telecom band, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01745 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    C. B. Young, A. Safari, P. Huft, et al., An architecture for quantum networking of neutral atom processors, Applied Physics B 128, 151 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Quan- tum Information 9, 90 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Sinclair, J

    J. Sinclair, J. Ramette, B. Grinkemeyer, D. Bluvstein, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Fault-tolerant optical in- terconnects for neutral-atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013313 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Designing Fault-Tolerant Blind Quantum Computation

    G. Baranes, I. W. Wang, F. Machado, A. Suleyman- zade, P.-J. Stas, Y.-C. Wei, S. F. Yelin, J. Borregaard, and M. D. Lukin, Designing fault-tolerant blind quantum computation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21621 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Maeda, T

    Y. Maeda, T. Kobayashi, T. Ueno, K. Shibata, S. Take- naka, K. Ito, Y. Fujiwara, S. Miki, H. Terai, T. Kodama, et al. , Waveguide-array-based multiplexed photonic in- terface for atom array, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.21533 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Safari, E

    A. Safari, E. Oh, P. Huft, G. Chase, J. Zhang, and M. Saffman, Efficient and compact quantum network node based on a parabolic mirror on an optical chip, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13420 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Ikuta, T

    R. Ikuta, T. Kobayashi, T. Kawakami, S. Miki, M. Yabuno, T. Yamashita, H. Terai, M. Koashi, T. Mukai, T. Yamamoto, and N. Imoto, Polarization in- sensitive frequency conversion for an atom-photon en- tanglement distribution via a telecom network, Nature Communications 9, 1997 (2018)

    1997

  42. [42]

    M. Bock, P. Eich, S. Kucera, M. Kreis, A. Lenhard, C. Becher, and J. Eschner, High-fidelity entanglement between a trapped ion and a telecom photon via quan- tum frequency conversion, Nature Communications 9, 10.1038/s41467-018-04341-2 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04341-2 2018

  43. [43]

    D. H. Jundt, Temperature-dependent Sellmeier equation for the index of refraction, ne, in congruent lithium nio- bate, Optics letters 22, 1553 (1997). 9

    1997

  44. [44]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2008)

    2008

  45. [45]

    Hannegan, U

    J. Hannegan, U. Saha, J. D. Siverns, J. Cassell, E. Waks, and Q. Quraishi, C-band single photons from a trapped ion via two-stage frequency conversion, Applied Physics Letters 119 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    U. Saha, J. D. Siverns, J. Hannegan, M. Prabhu, Q. Quraishi, D. Englund, and E. Waks, Routing single photons from a trapped ion using a photonic integrated circuit, Physical Review Applied 19, 034001 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    D. E. Zelmon, D. L. Small, and D. Jundt, Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol.% magnesium oxide–doped lithium niobate, Journal of the Optical Society of Amer- ica B 14, 3319 (1997)

    1997

  48. [48]

    L. Deng, X. Gao, Z. Cao, W. Chen, Y. Yuan, W. Zhang, and Z. Gong, Improvement to Sellmeier equation for periodically poled LiNbO3 crystal using mid-infrared difference-frequency generation, Optics Communications 268, 110 (2006)

    2006

  49. [49]

    Massar and S

    S. Massar and S. Popescu, Optimal extraction of infor- mation from finite quantum ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995)

    1995

  50. [50]

    M. A. Nielsen, A simple formula for the average gate fi- delity of a quantum dynamical operation, Physics Letters A 303, 249 (2002)

    2002

  51. [51]

    J. M. Thomas, F. I. Yeh, J. H. Chen, J. J. Mambretti, S. J. Kohlert, G. S. Kanter, and P. Kumar, Quantum teleportation coexisting with classical communications in optical fiber, Optica 11, 1700 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    Monroe, R

    C. Monroe, R. Raussendorf, A. Ruthven, K. R. Brown, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan, and J. Kim, Large-scale mod- ular quantum-computer architecture with atomic mem- ory and photonic interconnects, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022317 (2014)

    2014

  53. [53]

    M. Dong, M. Zimmermann, D. Heim, H. Choi, G. Clark, A. J. Leenheer, K. J. Palm, A. Witte, D. Dominguez, G. Gilbert, et al. , Programmable photonic integrated meshes for modular generation of optical entanglement links, npj Quantum Information 9, 42 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    An optical interconnect for modular quantum computers,

    D. Sakuma, A. Taherkhani, T. Tsuno, T. Sasaki, H. Shimizu, K. Teramoto, A. Todd, Y. Ueno, M. Haj- dušek, R. Ikuta, et al., An optical interconnect for modu- lar quantum computers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09299 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    K.-C. Chen, F. Burt, N. K. Panigrahy, and K. K. Leung, Adaptive resource orchestration for distributed quantum computing systems, IEEE Internet Computing (2026)

    2026

  56. [56]

    Huang, Y

    Y. Huang, Y. Yang, H. Li, J. Wang, J. Qiu, Z. Qi, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Zheng, and X. Chen, Quantum fu- sion of independent networks based on multi-user entan- glement swapping, Nature Photonics 20, 87 (2026)

    2026

  57. [57]

    Pouryousef, E

    S. Pouryousef, E. Kaur, H. Shapourian, D. Towsley, R. Kompella, and R. Nejabati, Benchmarking quantum data center architectures: A performance and scalability perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01353 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    H. Fan, Z. Ma, J. Chen, Z. Li, C. Tang, Y. M. Sua, and Y. Huang, Photon conversion in thin-film lithium niobate nanowaveguides: a noise analysis, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 38, 2172 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    X. Wang, X. Jiao, B. Wang, Y. Liu, X.-P. Xie, M.-Y. Zheng, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum frequency conversion and single-photon detection with lithium nio- bate nanophotonic chips, npj Quantum Information 9, 38 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    F. Mann, H. M. Chrzanowski, F. Gewers, M. Placke, and S. Ramelow, Low-noise quantum frequency conversion in a monolithic cavity with bulk periodically poled potas- sium titanyl phosphate, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 054010 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Suchowski, D

    H. Suchowski, D. Oron, A. Arie, and Y. Silberberg, Geo- metrical representation of sum frequency generation and adiabatic frequency conversion, Phys. Rev. A 78, 063821 (2008)

    2008

  62. [62]

    Chen, Z.-Y

    L. Chen, Z.-Y. Zhou, M.-Y. Gao, Z.-Q.-Z. Han, Y.-W. Song, R.-H. Chen, B.-S. Shi, et al. , An all optical broad- band tunable quantum frequency shifter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04959 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    X.-X. Fang, G. Shentu, and H. Lu, Broadband quan- tum photon source in a step-chirped periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide, Optics Express 34, 3759 (2026)

    2026