pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.22945 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Quantum Dynamics and Collapse-and-Revival Phenomena in the Dunkl Anharmonic Oscillator

D. Ojeda-Guill\'en , R. D. Mota , M. Salazar-Ram\'irez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords Dunkl anharmonic oscillatorSU(1,1) algebracollapse and revivalDunkl coherent statesKerr mediumquantum dynamicssqueezed states
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Dunkl anharmonic oscillator admits an exact parity-dependent energy spectrum via su(1,1) algebra, yielding Dunkl-parameter-tuned collapse and revival dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper solves the Dunkl anharmonic oscillator exactly by rewriting its Hamiltonian using Dunkl creation and annihilation operators that obey the su(1,1) commutation relations. The resulting energy levels depend on the parity of the eigenstates and on the value of the Dunkl parameter μ. Starting from a superposition of even and odd Dunkl coherent states, the time evolution reveals that μ adjusts the periods of fractional revivals and enables complete state reconstruction at half the revival time for certain values. The analysis of quadrature operators shows squeezing from interference effects near t=π. When μ vanishes, the familiar Kerr medium behavior is recovered without deformation.

Core claim

By expressing the Dunkl anharmonic oscillator Hamiltonian in terms of Dunkl operators that close the su(1,1) algebra, the authors derive the exact parity-dependent energy spectrum. Quantum dynamics are then studied using superpositions of even and odd Dunkl coherent states as initial conditions. This reveals that the Dunkl parameter μ modulates the fractional revivals and produces perfect state reconstructions at half-periods for specific deformation values, while the quadrature variance indicates the generation of interference-induced squeezed states around t ≈ π. The standard Kerr medium is recovered as μ → 0.

What carries the argument

Dunkl creation and annihilation operators closing the su(1,1) Lie algebra for algebraic diagonalization of the anharmonic Hamiltonian.

If this is right

  • The energy spectrum splits into even and odd parity sectors with explicit dependence on μ.
  • Fractional revivals in the dynamics are shifted by factors involving μ.
  • Perfect state reconstruction occurs at half-periods for specific values of the Dunkl parameter.
  • Interference effects from the Dunkl deformation produce squeezed states at t ≈ π.
  • The collapse-revival pattern reduces to that of the standard Kerr medium when μ = 0.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The algebraic method could be applied to other anharmonic potentials deformed by Dunkl operators to find exact solutions.
  • Experimental systems with parity or reflection symmetry might realize the Dunkl deformation and test the tunable revivals.
  • Control over μ could enable engineering of quantum states with prescribed revival times in optical or atomic systems.

Load-bearing premise

The Dunkl creation and annihilation operators close the su(1,1) Lie algebra in the precise manner required to diagonalize the full anharmonic Hamiltonian algebraically.

What would settle it

Numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in a truncated basis would deviate from the proposed closed-form parity-dependent energies if the su(1,1) closure does not hold for the anharmonic term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22945 by D. Ojeda-Guill\'en, M. Salazar-Ram\'irez, R. D. Mota.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of the quadrature ⟨Xµ(t)⟩ over a full cycle. The Dunkl parameter µ produces a half-cycle revival at t ≈ π, while a complete resynchronization of all wave packets occurs at t ≈ 2π. For this numerical simulation, the anharmonicity parameter is set to λ = 1, the free oscillator frequency to ω = 20, and the initial coherent state amplitude is α = 2. 9 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Survival probability F(t) for different values of the Dunkl parameter: µ = 0 (stan￾dard), µ = 0.5 and µ = 1.0. The vertical alignment at t ≈ 6.28 confirms the universal revival period 2π/λ (evaluated here with the free oscillator frequency ω = 20, the anharmonicity parameter λ = 1, and the initial amplitude α = 2). For µ = 0.5, a perfect additional revival occurs at t = π/λ. 11 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Temporal evolution of the quadrature variance (∆ view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the Dunkl anharmonic oscillator (Kerr medium) Hamiltonian from an algebraic approach of the $SU(1,1)$ group. In order to obtain the exact energy spectrum of this problem, we write its Hamiltonian in terms of the Dunkl creation and annihilation operators, which close the $su(1,1)$ Lie algebra. This allows us to exactly solve this Hamiltonian and obtain its parity-dependent energy spectrum. Then, we investigate the quantum dynamics of the system, particularly the collapse and revival phenomena, by using an initial state given by a superposition of even and odd Dunkl coherent states. We compute the field quadrature and the survival probability, showing that the Dunkl parameter $\mu$ modulates the fractional revivals and produces perfect state reconstructions at half-periods for specific deformation values. We analyze the quadrature variance to show that the Dunkl deformation generates interference-induced squeezed states around $t \approx \pi$. The standard Kerr medium dynamics are exactly recovered in the limit $\mu \rightarrow 0$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents an algebraic SU(1,1) treatment of the Dunkl anharmonic oscillator (Kerr) Hamiltonian. It claims that expressing the Hamiltonian in terms of Dunkl creation and annihilation operators, which close the su(1,1) Lie algebra, yields the exact parity-dependent energy spectrum. The work then analyzes the quantum dynamics of collapse and revival using superpositions of even and odd Dunkl coherent states, showing that the deformation parameter μ modulates fractional revivals, enables perfect state reconstructions at half-periods for specific values, generates interference-induced squeezing around t ≈ π, and recovers the standard Kerr dynamics exactly in the μ → 0 limit.

Significance. If the algebraic closure and diagonalization hold, the manuscript provides a useful extension of group-theoretic methods to Dunkl-deformed systems in quantum optics, delivering closed-form spectra and dynamics that are otherwise typically numerical. The explicit demonstration of μ-dependent revival modulation and the external consistency check via the μ → 0 limit to standard Kerr are clear strengths that could generalize to other deformed oscillators.

major comments (1)
  1. [Algebraic construction of the Hamiltonian and su(1,1) generators] The central claim of an exact parity-dependent spectrum rests on writing the full anharmonic Hamiltonian (including reflection contributions) as a polynomial in the su(1,1) generators K0, K± constructed from the Dunkl operators. The deformed relation [a, a†] = 1 + 2μ R implies that [K+, K-] acquires extra μ R terms absent from the classical su(1,1) relations; the manuscript must explicitly verify that these terms cancel or are absorbed so that the Hamiltonian remains diagonal in the discrete-series representation. Without this check, the parity-dependent closed-form energies do not necessarily follow.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the Dunkl parameter modulates fractional revivals but does not quote the explicit form of the energy eigenvalues or the revival times; adding a short equation for E_n^even/odd would improve readability.
  2. [Dynamics and quadrature section] The quadrature variance analysis around t ≈ π is presented as evidence of squeezing; a brief comparison plot or numerical values against the μ = 0 case would strengthen the claim of interference-induced squeezing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested explicit verification into the revised version to strengthen the algebraic foundation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Algebraic construction of the Hamiltonian and su(1,1) generators] The central claim of an exact parity-dependent spectrum rests on writing the full anharmonic Hamiltonian (including reflection contributions) as a polynomial in the su(1,1) generators K0, K± constructed from the Dunkl operators. The deformed relation [a, a†] = 1 + 2μ R implies that [K+, K-] acquires extra μ R terms absent from the classical su(1,1) relations; the manuscript must explicitly verify that these terms cancel or are absorbed so that the Hamiltonian remains diagonal in the discrete-series representation. Without this check, the parity-dependent closed-form energies do not necessarily follow.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the importance of rigorously confirming the su(1,1) closure. In our construction, the Dunkl operators satisfy [a, a†] = 1 + 2μ R with R the reflection operator obeying R² = 1 and {a, R} = 0. The generators are defined as K₀ = ½(a†a + ½ + μ R), K₊ = ½(a†)², K₋ = ½ a². Direct computation of [K₊, K₋] yields the standard relation [K₊, K₋] = −2K₀; all extra terms proportional to μ R cancel identically because of the anticommutation {a, R} = 0 and the action of R on the even/odd subspaces. Consequently, the anharmonic (Kerr) Hamiltonian remains a function of K₀ alone and is diagonal in the discrete-series representations labeled by parity, producing the exact parity-dependent spectrum Eₙ^±. We will add this explicit commutator calculation (including all intermediate steps) as a new subsection in Section II of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: algebraic diagonalization uses stated closure property of Dunkl operators

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins by expressing the Dunkl-Kerr Hamiltonian in terms of Dunkl creation and annihilation operators, which are stated to close the su(1,1) Lie algebra. This algebraic structure is treated as an input property of the Dunkl operators rather than fitted to or derived from the target spectrum. The exact parity-dependent energies and subsequent collapse-revival dynamics (modulated by μ, with perfect reconstructions at specific values) follow directly from this representation. The μ → 0 limit recovering standard Kerr dynamics provides an external consistency check independent of the fitted or derived quantities. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or predictions that reduce by construction to inputs appear in the chain. The skeptic concern about extra reflection terms addresses algebraic correctness, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the su(1,1) closure property of Dunkl operators and the introduction of the deformation parameter μ; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Dunkl deformation parameter μ
    Introduced to deform the oscillator; its specific values are chosen to produce perfect revivals and squeezing.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dunkl creation and annihilation operators satisfy the su(1,1) commutation relations
    Invoked to rewrite the Hamiltonian and obtain the exact spectrum.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1260 out tokens · 29869 ms · 2026-05-08T11:50:06.982056+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Estes, T.H

    L.E. Estes, T.H. Keil, and L.M. Narducci,Phys. Rev.175(1968) 286

    work page 1968

  2. [2]

    Caves,Phys

    C.M. Caves,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 1693

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    Gerry,Phys

    C.C. Gerry,Phys. Rev. A35(1987) 2146

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    Perelomov,Commun

    A.M. Perelomov,Commun. Math. Phys.26(1972) 222

    work page 1972

  5. [5]

    W´ odkiewicz and J.H

    K. W´ odkiewicz and J.H. Eberly,J. Opt. Soc. Am. B2(1985) 458

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Gerry,Phys

    C.C. Gerry,Phys. Rev. A39(1989) 3204

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    Vourdas,Phys

    A. Vourdas,Phys. Rev. A41(1990) 1653. 15

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Yurke, S.L

    B. Yurke, S.L. McCall, and J.R. Klauder,Phys. Rev. A33(1986) 4033

    work page 1986

  9. [9]

    Ojeda-Guill´ en, R.D

    D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, R.D. Mota, and V.D. Granados,J. Math. Phys.55, 042109 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Chore˜ no, D

    E. Chore˜ no, D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, and V.D. Granados,Eur. Phys. J. D72(2018) 142

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Makarov,Phys

    D.N. Makarov,Phys. Rev. E97(2018) 042203

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Ramos-Prieto, R

    I. Ramos-Prieto, R. Rom´ an-Ancheyta, J. R´ ecamier, M. Berrondo, and H.M. Moya-Cessa, Phys. Lett. A408(2021) 127490

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Algarni, K

    M. Algarni, K. Berrada, S. Abdel-Khalek, and H. Eleuch,Mathematics10(2022) 3051

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Jones, J

    C. Jones, J. Xavier, S.V. Kashanian, M. Nguyen, I. Aharonovich, and F. Vollmer,Opt. Express31(2023) 10794

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Bocanegra-Garay, L

    I.A. Bocanegra-Garay, L. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, F. Soto-Eguibar, and H.M. Moya-Cessa, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 007

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Chore˜ no, R

    E. Chore˜ no, R. Valencia, and D. Ojeda-Guill´ en,J. Math. Phys.62(2021) 071701

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    J.C. Vega, E. Chore˜ no, D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, and R.D. Mota,J. Opt. Soc. Am. B41(2024) 1084

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    J.C. Vega, D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, and R.D. Mota,J. Opt. Soc. Am. B42(2025) 683

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Wigner,Phys

    E.P. Wigner,Phys. Rev.77(1950) 711

    work page 1950

  20. [20]

    Yang,Phys

    L.M. Yang,Phys. Rev.84(1951) 788

    work page 1951

  21. [21]

    Dunkl,Trans

    C.F. Dunkl,Trans. Am. Math. Soc.311(1989) 167

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    Dunkl, and Y

    C.F. Dunkl, and Y. Xu,Orthogonal polynomials of several variables, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Jayaraman, and R

    J. Jayaraman, and R. de Lima Rodrigues, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23 (1990) 3123

    work page 1990

  24. [24]

    Jayaraman, R

    J. Jayaraman, R. de Lima Rodrigues, and A.N. Vaidya, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 (1999) 6643

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    de Lima Rodrigues,The q-deformed Wigner oscillator in quantum mechanics, arXiv:hep-th/0308188 (2003)

    R. de Lima Rodrigues,The q-deformed Wigner oscillator in quantum mechanics, arXiv:hep-th/0308188 (2003)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2003

  26. [26]

    de Lima Rodrigues, J

    R. de Lima Rodrigues, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009) 355213

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Carrion and R

    H.L. Carrion and R. de Lima Rodrigues, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25 (2010) 2507

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    de Lima Rodrigues,The Wigner-Heisenberg algebra in quantum mechanics, in Ad- vances in Quantum Mechanics, edited by P

    R. de Lima Rodrigues,The Wigner-Heisenberg algebra in quantum mechanics, in Ad- vances in Quantum Mechanics, edited by P. Bracken, IntechOpen, London, 2013

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Plyuschay,Ann

    M.S. Plyuschay,Ann. Phys.245(1996) 339. 16

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    Plyuschay,Nucl

    M.S. Plyuschay,Nucl. Phys. B491(1997) 619

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    Genest, M.E.H

    V.X. Genest, M.E.H. Ismail, L. Vinet, and A. Zhedanov,J. Phys. A.46(2013) 145201

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Genest, M.E.H

    V.X. Genest, M.E.H. Ismail, L. Vinet, and A. Zhedanov,Commun. Math. Phys.329 (2014) 999

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Salazar-Ram´ ırez, D

    M. Salazar-Ram´ ırez, D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, R.D. Mota, and V.D. Granados,Eur. Phys. J. Plus132(2017) 39

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Ghazouani, I

    S. Ghazouani, I. Sboui, M.A. Amdouni, and M.B. El Hadj Rhouma,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52(2019) 225202

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Quesne,J

    C. Quesne,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58(2025) 505204

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Raber, H

    D.E.M. Raber, H. Benzair, T. Boudjedaa, and M. Merad,Phys. Scr.100(2025) 015277

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Benarous, A

    M. Benarous, A. Hocine, B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, and B. Hamil,J. Stat. Mech.5(2025) 053102

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Hamil, B.C

    B. Hamil, B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, and M. Merad,Phys. Scr.100(2025) 035301

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, A

    B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, A. Benchikha, B. Hamil, and B. Khantoul,Mod. Phys. Lett. A40(2025) 2550009

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Hocine, F

    A. Hocine, F. Merabtine, B. Hamil, B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, and M. Benarous,Indian J. Phys. 99(2025) 775

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Hamil, B.C

    B. Hamil, B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu, and M. Merad,Mod. Phys. Lett. A40(2025) 2550094

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Salazar-Ram´ ırez, J.A

    M. Salazar-Ram´ ırez, J.A. Mart´ ınez-Nu˜ no, and M.R. Cordero-L´ opez,Few-Body Syst.67 (2026) 3

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    Moroz,EPL113(2016) 50004

    A. Moroz,EPL113(2016) 50004

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Hamil, and B.C

    B. Hamil, and B.C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu,Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(2022) 812

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Chung, and H

    W.S. Chung, and H. Hassanabadi,Few-Body Syst.62(2021) 24

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Ojeda-Guill´ en, R.D

    D. Ojeda-Guill´ en, R.D. Mota, and J.C. Vega-Pacheco,arXiv:2602.16743(2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16743

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16743 2026

  47. [47]

    Tana´ s,Coherence and Quantum Optics V, edited by L

    R. Tana´ s,Coherence and Quantum Optics V, edited by L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Plenum, New York, 1984

    work page 1984

  48. [48]

    Eberly, N.B

    J.H. Eberly, N.B. Narozhny, and J.J. Sanchez-Mondragon,Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 1323

    work page 1980

  49. [49]

    Kirchmair, B

    G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, Z. Leghtas, S.E. Nigg, H. Paik, E. Ginossar, M. Mirrahimi, L. Frunzio, S.M. Girvin, and R.J. Schoelkopf,Nature495(2013) 205

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Yurke, and D

    B. Yurke, and D. Stoler,Phys. Rev. Lett.57(1986) 13. 17

    work page 1986

  51. [51]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V.V. Albert, S. Touzard, R.J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M.H. Devoret,New J. Phys.16(2014) 045014

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Ghazouani,J

    S. Ghazouani,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55(2022) 505203

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Sedaghatnia, H

    P. Sedaghatnia, H. Hassanabadi, G. Junker, J. Kˇ r´ ıˇ z, S. Hassanabadi, and W.S. Chung, 458(2023) 169445

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Milburn,Phys

    G.J. Milburn,Phys. Rev. A33(1986) 674. 18

    work page 1986