pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26089 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Domain-induced control of latent heat in freestanding BaTiO₃ membranes

Tapas Bar , David Pesquera , Arnau Villalobos-Martin , Cristian Rodriguez-Tinoco , Umair Saeed , Kumara Cordero-Edwards , Jessica Padilla , Jose Manuel Caicedo Roque
show 6 more authors
Jose Santiso Pol Lloveras Leo Boron Igor Lukyanchuk Gustau Catalan Javier Rodriguez-Viejo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords BaTiO3 membranesferroelectric transition orderlatent heatdomain morphologynanocalorimetry180 degree domainsGinzburg-Landau model
0
0 comments X

The pith

In freestanding BaTiO3 membranes, domain morphology controls whether the tetragonal-cubic transition releases latent heat or occurs continuously.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the order of the phase transition in these membranes depends on the size and pattern of ferroelectric domains rather than thickness or substrate clamping. Thicker membranes containing large, mostly uniform domains release clear latent heat during the transition, while thinner membranes filled with dense 180-degree domain walls undergo a smooth continuous change with no latent heat. Both types of membrane experience the identical tetragonal-to-cubic structural shift, as confirmed by x-ray diffraction. Nanocalorimetry on freestanding samples, domain imaging, and modeling together establish that smaller domains lower the energy barrier between phases and round out the discontinuity.

Core claim

Freestanding BaTiO₃ membranes undergo the same tetragonal-cubic structural transition in every case, yet the presence of latent heat depends on domain morphology. Large monodomain-like regions in thick membranes produce measurable latent heat, indicating first-order behavior. Dense 180° domain patterns in thinner membranes produce a continuous transition without latent heat. Piezoresponse force microscopy links the difference to domain-size evolution, and Ginzburg-Landau analysis shows that reduced domain size lowers the free-energy barrier that would otherwise create a discontinuous jump.

What carries the argument

Domain morphology, specifically the lateral size of polarized regions and the density of 180° domain walls, which sets the height of the free-energy barrier in the Ginzburg-Landau description of the transition.

If this is right

  • Domain engineering during growth can tune the caloric response of ferroelectric membranes without changing material composition or thickness.
  • Freestanding geometry isolates intrinsic domain effects from substrate clamping and heat sinking.
  • The identical crystal-structure change can be rendered either first-order or continuous by adjusting domain patterns.
  • Design rules for oxide-membrane devices now include domain-size control as a route to desired transition behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same domain-size mechanism may allow control of transition order in other perovskite ferroelectrics beyond BaTiO3.
  • Real-time electric-field switching of domains could provide a way to toggle latent heat on and off in operating devices.
  • Prior reports attributing continuous transitions solely to strain or dimensionality may need re-examination once domain morphology is accounted for.
  • Flexible or suspended membrane platforms could exploit domain patterning for tailored electrocaloric cooling cycles.

Load-bearing premise

Observed differences in latent heat arise only from domain-size effects on the phase-transition barrier, without major confounding by membrane defects, residual strain, or choices of which regions were measured.

What would settle it

Preparing a set of membranes with domain sizes varied independently of thickness, then measuring whether latent heat still tracks domain size alone rather than defects or strain levels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26089 by Arnau Villalobos-Martin, Cristian Rodriguez-Tinoco, David Pesquera, Gustau Catalan, Igor Lukyanchuk, Javier Rodriguez-Viejo, Jessica Padilla, Jose Manuel Caicedo Roque, Jose Santiso, Kumara Cordero-Edwards, Leo Boron, Pol Lloveras, Tapas Bar, Umair Saeed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Temperature-dependent specific heat capacity of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction patterns of view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fourth-order coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic diagram of nanocalorimetry for free-standing membranes. (1,2) Release the sample from the substrate view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Heat capacity of the 450 nm-thick membrane measured at different heating rates. The latent heat peaks of the view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) A representative image of BaTiO view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Nano-calorimetry measurements performed on 100 nm TPD deposited directly on the chip (black) and 90 nm TPD view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thin ferroelectric BaTiO$_3$ films often exhibit continuous transitions instead of the first-order behavior of bulk crystals, a discrepancy usually attributed to epitaxial strain or dimensionality. Using quasi-adiabatic nanocalorimetry on freestanding BaTiO$_3$ membranes-free of clamping and substrate heat sinking-we show that domain morphology, not thickness or boundary conditions, controls the transition order. Thick membranes with large, monodomain-like regions display clear latent heat, whereas thinner membranes with dense 180$^{\circ}$ domain patterns show a continuous transition despite undergoing the same tetragonal-cubic structural change confirmed by x-ray diffraction. Piezoresponse force microscopy links this behavior to domain-size evolution, and a Ginzburg-Landau analysis demonstrates how reduced domain size lowers the free-energy barrier, rounding a nominally first-order instability. These results identify domain morphology as the key determinant of ferroelectric transition order in oxide membranes and establish design guidelines for enhancing caloric effects through domain engineering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that domain morphology, rather than thickness or boundary conditions, controls the order of the tetragonal-cubic ferroelectric transition in freestanding BaTiO3 membranes. Using quasi-adiabatic nanocalorimetry, XRD, and PFM, it shows that thick membranes with large, monodomain-like regions exhibit clear latent heat (first-order transition), while thinner membranes with dense 180° domain patterns display a continuous transition despite the same structural change. A Ginzburg-Landau analysis is invoked to show that reduced domain size lowers the free-energy barrier, rounding the nominally first-order instability. The work identifies domain engineering as a route to control caloric effects in oxide membranes.

Significance. If the central claim holds after addressing controls, the result would be significant for ferroelectric physics and caloric applications by shifting emphasis from epitaxial strain or dimensionality to domain morphology as the determinant of transition order. A strength is the use of freestanding membranes to eliminate substrate clamping and heat sinking, combined with multi-technique characterization (nanocalorimetry contrasts, XRD confirmation of structure, PFM domain imaging) that enables direct correlation of morphology with latent heat.

major comments (3)
  1. [experimental results on thickness and domain variation] The comparison of thick vs. thin membranes (abstract and main experimental sections) confounds domain morphology with thickness; to isolate domain size as the sole control parameter, the manuscript requires data on fixed-thickness samples with deliberately varied domain configurations (e.g., via poling or annealing) while keeping other variables constant.
  2. [Ginzburg-Landau analysis] In the Ginzburg-Landau analysis section, the demonstration that reduced domain size lowers the free-energy barrier must specify the model equations, parameter values, and whether they are derived independently from material constants or adjusted to reproduce the observed nanocalorimetry contrast; without this, the argument risks circularity with the calorimetry data.
  3. [nanocalorimetry and PFM results] The nanocalorimetry and PFM correlation (results section) lacks details on region selection criteria, statistical sampling across multiple spots, error bars on latent-heat values, and local strain/defect mapping (e.g., via XRD or Raman) on the exact calorimetry locations; without these, residual fabrication-induced strain or post-hoc selection in thinner membranes cannot be excluded as alternative explanations for the rounded transition.
minor comments (1)
  1. [figures and methods] Figure captions and methods should explicitly state the number of independent membranes measured and the criteria used to classify 'large' vs. 'dense' domain regions for quantitative comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The comparison of thick vs. thin membranes (abstract and main experimental sections) confounds domain morphology with thickness; to isolate domain size as the sole control parameter, the manuscript requires data on fixed-thickness samples with deliberately varied domain configurations (e.g., via poling or annealing) while keeping other variables constant.

    Authors: We agree that thickness and domain morphology are correlated in our current samples. We will add a dedicated discussion section and supplementary figures showing that the transition order tracks domain size more closely than thickness across our multi-sample dataset, including literature comparisons where thickness variations alone do not alter transition order in clamped films. We will also include additional PFM and calorimetry data from membranes of comparable thickness prepared under different annealing conditions that yield varying domain densities. Deliberate poling of freestanding membranes remains technically challenging without fracture, so we cannot provide poled/unpoled pairs at fixed thickness; this limitation will be stated explicitly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: In the Ginzburg-Landau analysis section, the demonstration that reduced domain size lowers the free-energy barrier must specify the model equations, parameter values, and whether they are derived independently from material constants or adjusted to reproduce the observed nanocalorimetry contrast; without this, the argument risks circularity with the calorimetry data.

    Authors: We will expand the Ginzburg-Landau section to present the full set of model equations (Landau free-energy density with polarization gradient terms and domain-wall energy), list all numerical parameter values with their literature sources for BaTiO3, and clarify that these coefficients are taken from independent bulk measurements and not adjusted to fit our nanocalorimetry results. The calculation is used only to demonstrate the qualitative trend that smaller domains reduce the barrier height; we will add an explicit statement that no quantitative fitting to the experimental latent-heat values was performed. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The nanocalorimetry and PFM correlation (results section) lacks details on region selection criteria, statistical sampling across multiple spots, error bars on latent-heat values, and local strain/defect mapping (e.g., via XRD or Raman) on the exact calorimetry locations; without these, residual fabrication-induced strain or post-hoc selection in thinner membranes cannot be excluded as alternative explanations for the rounded transition.

    Authors: We will revise the results and methods sections to specify the region-selection criteria (optically uniform areas >10 µm from edges and cracks), report measurements from at least five independent spots per membrane type across three separate devices, include error bars on latent-heat values obtained from multiple thermal cycles, and add local micro-XRD or Raman maps acquired on the identical calorimetry-chip locations to confirm strain uniformity and absence of fabrication-induced defects. These additions will directly address the possibility of alternative explanations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from independent nanocalorimetry measurements of latent heat (present in thick/large-domain membranes, absent in thin/dense-domain ones), correlated via PFM imaging to domain morphology, with XRD confirming identical tetragonal-cubic structural change. The Ginzburg-Landau analysis is invoked only to illustrate how domain-size reduction can lower the free-energy barrier in a standard model; no quoted equations, parameter values, or statements indicate that model parameters were fitted to the calorimetry contrast or that any 'prediction' reduces by construction to the input data. No self-citations are load-bearing for the central claim, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled in. The result is therefore not equivalent to its inputs by definition and stands as an independent experimental finding with theoretical illustration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard Ginzburg-Landau phenomenology for ferroelectrics plus the experimental premise that nanocalorimetry and PFM faithfully report domain-controlled barrier heights; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ginzburg-Landau theory accurately describes the free-energy landscape of the tetragonal-cubic transition in BaTiO3
    Invoked to link domain size to barrier height

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1323 out tokens · 31889 ms · 2026-05-07T15:36:54.679345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Xu,Ferroelectric materials and their applications(El- sevier, 2013)

    Y. Xu,Ferroelectric materials and their applications(El- sevier, 2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Huang and J

    H. Huang and J. F. Scott,Ferroelectric materials for en- ergy applications(John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    B. A. Strukov and A. P. Levanyuk,Ferroelectric phenom- ena in crystals: physical foundations(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    X. Moya, E. Stern-Taulats, S. Crossley, D. Gonz´ alez- Alonso, S. Kar-Narayan, A. Planes, L. Ma˜ nosa, and N. D. Mathur, Giant electrocaloric strength in single-crystal BaTiO3, Advanced Materials25, 1360 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Vales-Castro, R

    P. Vales-Castro, R. Faye, M. Vellvehi, Y. Nouchokgwe, X. Perpi˜ n` a, J. M. Caicedo, X. Jord` a, K. Roleder, D. Ka- jewski, A. Perez-Tomas, E. Defay, and G. Catalan, Origin of large negative electrocaloric effect in antiferroelectric PbZro3, Phys. Rev. B103, 054112 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    M. S. Senn, D. A. Keen, T. C. A. Lucas, J. A. Hriljac, and A. L. Goodwin, Emergence of long-range order in BaTiO3 from local symmetry-breaking distortions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 207602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    E. A. Stern, Character of order-disorder and displacive components in barium titanate, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 037601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    B. c. v. Zalar, V. V. Laguta, and R. Blinc, Nmr evidence for the coexistence of order-disorder and displacive com- ponents in barium titanate, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 037601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Y. Qi, S. Liu, I. Grinberg, and A. M. Rappe, Atomistic description for temperature-driven phase transitions in 6 BaTiO3, Phys. Rev. B94, 134308 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Pa´ sciak, T

    M. Pa´ sciak, T. R. Welberry, J. Kulda, S. Leoni, and J. Hlinka, Dynamic displacement disorder of cubic BaTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 167601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    H. Luo, L. Cao, H. Ke, G. Liu, and Y. Zhou, Statistical singularity energy in ferroelectric phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B108, L060101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Pramanick, X

    A. Pramanick, X. P. Wang, C. Hoffmann, S. O. Di- allo, M. R. V. Jørgensen, and X.-L. Wang, Microdomain dynamics in single-crystal BaTiO 3 during paraelectric- ferroelectric phase transition measured with time-of- flight neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B92, 174103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Zhong, D

    W. Zhong, D. Vanderbilt, and K. M. Rabe, Phase tran- sitions in BaTiO 3 from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1861 (1994)

    work page 1994

  14. [14]

    N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, and A. K. Tagant- sev, Effect of mechanical boundary conditions on phase diagrams of epitaxial ferroelectric thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1988 (1998)

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    K. J. Choi, M. Biegalski, Y. L. Li, A. Sharan, J. Schubert, R. Uecker, P. Reiche, Y. B. Chen, X. Q. Pan, V. Gopalan, L.-Q. Chen, D. G. Schlom, and C. B. Eom, Enhancement of ferroelectricity in strained BaTiO 3 thin films, Science 306, 1005 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Strukov, S

    B. Strukov, S. Davitadze, V. Lemanov, S. Shulman, Y. Uesu, and S. Asanuma, Comparative study of phase transitions in polycrystalline and epitaxial BaTiO 3 thin films by specific heat measurements, Ferroelectrics347, 179 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    Akcay, S

    G. Akcay, S. P. Alpay, J. Rossetti, G. A., and J. F. Scott, Influence of mechanical boundary conditions on the elec- trocaloric properties of ferroelectric thin films, Journal of Applied Physics103, 024104 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    C. B. Parker, J.-P. Maria, and A. I. Kingon, Temperature and thickness dependent permittivity of (Ba,Sr)TiO 3 thin films, Applied Physics Letters81, 340 (2002)

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Kretschmer and K

    R. Kretschmer and K. Binder, Surface effects on phase transitions in ferroelectrics and dipolar magnets, Phys. Rev. B20, 1065 (1979)

    work page 1979

  20. [20]

    H. Sun, J. Gu, Y. Li, T. R. Paudel, D. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Zang, C. Gu, J. Yang, W. Sun, Z. Gu, E. Y. Tsym- bal, J. Liu, H. Huang, D. Wu, and Y. Nie, Prominent size effects without a depolarization field observed in ul- trathin ferroelectric oxide membranes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Catalan, L

    G. Catalan, L. J. Sinnamon, and J. M. Gregg, The ef- fect of flexoelectricity on the dielectric properties of in- homogeneously strained ferroelectric thin films, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, 2253 (2004)

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    Yudin, J

    P. Yudin, J. Duchon, O. Pacherova, M. Klementova, T. Kocourek, A. Dejneka, and M. Tyunina, Ferroelec- tric phase transitions induced by a strain gradient, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033213 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Imry and M

    Y. Imry and M. Wortis, Influence of quenched impurities on first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B19, 3580 (1979)

    work page 1979

  24. [24]

    Aizenman and J

    M. Aizenman and J. Wehr, Rounding of first-order phase transitions in systems with quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2503 (1989)

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Cardy and J

    J. Cardy and J. L. Jacobsen, Critical behavior of random- bond potts models, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 4063 (1997)

    work page 1997

  26. [26]

    M. M. Saad, P. Baxter, R. M. Bowman, J. M. Gregg, F. D. Morrison, and J. F. Scott, Intrinsic dielectric response in ferroelectric nano-capacitors, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter16, L451 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    D. Lu, D. J. Baek, S. S. Hong, L. F. Kourkoutis, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Synthesis of freestanding single-crystal perovskite films and heterostructures by etching of sacrificial water-soluble layers. nature mate- rials, Nature materials15, 1255 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Pesquera, E

    D. Pesquera, E. Parsonnet, A. Qualls, R. Xu, A. J. Gub- ser, J. Kim, Y. Jiang, G. Velarde, Y.-L. Huang, H. Y. Hwang, R. Ramesh, and L. W. Martin, Beyond sub- strates: Strain engineering of ferroelectric membranes, Advanced Materials32, 2003780 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Pesquera, A

    D. Pesquera, A. Fern´ andez, E. Khestanova, and L. W. Martin, Freestanding complex-oxide membranes, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 383001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Ganguly, D

    S. Ganguly, D. Pesquera, D. M. Garcia, U. Saeed, N. Mirzamohammadi, J. Santiso, J. Padilla, J. M. C. Roque, C. Laulh´ e, F. Berenguer, L. G. Villanueva, and G. Catalan, Photostrictive actuators based on freestand- ing ferroelectric membranes, Advanced Materials36, 2310198 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    M. Lee, J. R. Renshof, K. J. van Zeggeren, M. J. A. Houmes, E. Lesne, M. ˇSiˇ skins, T. C. van Thiel, R. H. Guis, M. R. van Blankenstein, G. J. Verbiest, A. D. Cav- iglia, H. S. J. van der Zant, and P. G. Steeneken, Ul- trathin piezoelectric resonators based on graphene and free-standing single-crystal BaTiO3, Advanced Materials 34, 2204630 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Efremov, E

    M. Efremov, E. Olson, M. Zhang, S. Lai, F. Schiettekatte, Z. Zhang, and L. Allen, Thin-film differential scanning nanocalorimetry: heat capacity analysis, Thermochimica Acta412, 13 (2004)

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    Rodr´ ıguez-Viejo and A

    J. Rodr´ ıguez-Viejo and A. F. Lopeand´ ıa, Quasi- adiabatic, membrane-based, highly sensitive fast scan- ning nanocalorimetry, inFast Scanning Calorimetry, edited by C. Schick and V. Mathot (Springer Interna- tional Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 105–149

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Vila-Costa, J

    A. Vila-Costa, J. R` afols-Rib´ e, M. Gonz´ alez-Silveira, A. F. Lopeandia, L. Abad-Mu˜ noz, and J. Rodr´ ıguez- Viejo, Nucleation and growth of the supercooled liquid phase control glass transition in bulk ultrastable glasses, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076002 (2020). [35]See the Supplemental Material for details of the experi- ments and data analysis. The Sup...

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    B. J. Rodriguez, C. Callahan, S. V. Kalinin, and R. Proksch, Dual-frequency resonance-tracking atomic force microscopy, Nanotechnology18, 475504 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    K. M. Rabe, M. Dawber, C. Lichtensteiger, C. H. Ahn, and J.-M. Triscone, Modern physics of ferroelectrics: Es- sential background, inPhysics of Ferroelectrics: A Mod- ern Perspective, Vol. 105 (Springer, 2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Chrosch and E

    J. Chrosch and E. K. H. Salje, Temperature dependence of the domain wall width in LaAlO 3, Journal of Applied Physics85, 722 (1999)

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    W. Y. Shih, W.-H. Shih, and I. A. Aksay, Size dependence of the ferroelectric transition of small batio 3 particles: Effect of depolarization, Phys. Rev. B50, 15575 (1994)

    work page 1994

  39. [39]

    V. A. Stephanovich, I. A. Luk’Yanchuk, and M. G. Karkut, Domain proximity and ferroelectric transition in ferro-paraelectric superlattices, Ferroelectrics291, 169 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    V. A. Stephanovich, I. A. Luk’yanchuk, and M. G. Karkut, Domain-enhanced interlayer coupling in ferro- electric/paraelectric superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 7 047601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    I. A. Luk’yanchuk, L. Lahoche, and A. Sen´ e, Universal properties of ferroelectric domains, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 147601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Abrupt appear- ance of the domain pattern and fatigue of thin ferroelec- tric films, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3177 (2000)

    work page 2000

  43. [43]

    Zubko, N

    P. Zubko, N. Stucki, C. Lichtensteiger, and J.-M. Triscone, X-ray diffraction studies of 180°ferroelectric domains in pbtio 3/srtio3 superlattices under an applied electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 187601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Kornev, H

    I. Kornev, H. Fu, and L. Bellaiche, Ultrathin films of ferroelectric solid solutions under a residual depolarizing field, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 196104 (2004)

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    A. K. Yadav, C. T. Nelson, S. L. Hsu, Z. Hong, J. D. Clarkson, C. M. Schlep¨ utz, A. R. Damodaran, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, L. R. Dedon, D. Chen, A. Vishwanath, A. M. Minor, L. Q. Chen, J. F. Scott, L. W. Martin, and R. Ramesh, Observation of polar vortices in oxide superlattices, Nature530, 198 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Luk’yanchuk, A

    I. Luk’yanchuk, A. Razumnaya, S. Kondovych, Y. Tikhonov, and V. M. Vinokur, Topological fer- roelectric chirality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19728 (2024). [48]MATLAB code for the evaluation of fourth-order coeffi- cient B: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19711781

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19711781 2024

  47. [47]

    Kondovych, L

    S. Kondovych, L. Boron, F. N. Di Rino, M. Sepliarsky, A. G. Razumnaya, A. Sen´ e, and I. A. Lukyanchuk, Surface-tension-induced phase transitions in freestanding ferroelectric thin films, Nano Letters25, 12987 (2025), pMID: 40808329

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Uchino, E

    K. Uchino, E. Sadanaga, and T. Hirose, Dependence of the crystal structure on particle size in barium ti- tanate, Journal of the American Ceramic Society72, 1555 (1989)

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    R. C. Cammarata, Surface and interface stress effects in thin films, Progress in Surface Science46, 1 (1994)

    work page 1994

  50. [50]

    Ma, Surface tension and curie temperature in ferro- electric nanowires and nanodots, Applied Physics A96, 915 (2009)

    W. Ma, Surface tension and curie temperature in ferro- electric nanowires and nanodots, Applied Physics A96, 915 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    P. M. Diehm, P. ´Agoston, and K. Albe, Size-dependent lattice expansion in nanoparticles: Reality or anomaly?, ChemPhysChem13, 2443 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    I. A. Luk’yanchuk, A. Schilling, J. M. Gregg, G. Catalan, and J. F. Scott, Origin of ferroelastic domains in free- standing single-crystal ferroelectric films, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144111 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Mirzamohammadi, D

    N. Mirzamohammadi, D. Pesquera, G. De Luca, K. Cordero-Edwards, and G. Catalan, Molecular elec- trodes enable faster switching in ferroelectric thin films, Applied Physics Letters127, 012904 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Molina-Ruiz, A

    M. Molina-Ruiz, A. F. Lopeand´ ıa, F. Pi, D. Givord, O. Bourgeois, and J. Rodr´ ıguez-Viejo, Evidence of finite- size effect on the n´ eel temperature in ultrathin layers of CoO nanograins, Phys. Rev. B83, 140407 (2011). END NOTES Parameters We adopt here the standard material param- eters for BaTiO 3 [37]a 1=3.34(T−381 K)× 105 C−2m2N,a 11=4.69(T−436 K)×1...

    work page 2011