arxiv: 2605.00639 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Born-Qualified: An Autonomous Framework for Deploying Advanced Energy and Electronic Materials

Steven R. Spurgeon , Milad Abolhasani , Frederick Baddour , Ryan B. Comes , Vinayak P. Dravid , Hilary Egan , Patrick Emami , Robert W. Epps

show 23 more authors

Davi M. F\'ebba Renae Gannon E. Ashley Gaulding Ayana Ghosh Kenny Gruchalla Grace Guinan Taro Hitosugi Michael Holden Sergei V. Kalinin Yangang Liang John S. Mangum Matthew J. Olszta Nathaniel H. Park Axel Palmstrom Michelle A. Smeaton Brooks Tellekamp Nicholas E. Thornburg Raymond R. Unocic Daniela Ushizima Rama K. Vasudevan Robert White Andrew Young Andriy Zakutayev

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AI

keywords autonomous materials discoveryenergy technologiesvalley of deathborn-qualifiedmanufacturabilitymulti-objective optimizationcausal models

0 comments

The pith

Materials for advanced energy technologies can reach deployment faster by embedding manufacturability, cost, and durability into the autonomous discovery process from the beginning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Current autonomous materials science often optimizes for lab performance, causing many promising systems to fail when facing industrial realities. The paper introduces 'born-qualified' autonomous development to fix this by including manufacturing constraints early. This relies on four pillars: multi-objective metrics that balance performance with viability, causal models for understanding system behaviors, modular infrastructure for flexible experimentation, and closing the loop by feeding manufacturing data back into discovery. A reader should care because this could transform how energy technologies are developed, saving time and resources that are currently lost in the gap between lab and factory. The approach calls for broad community effort to implement these changes.

Core claim

We propose a new strategy called born-qualified autonomous development for materials and chemical systems. This strategy embeds manufacturability, cost, and durability constraints from the outset rather than prioritizing laboratory metrics alone. It is enabled by four pillars: the development of multi-objective metrics, causal models, a modular infrastructure, and embedding manufacturing in the discovery loop. Realizing this vision requires sustained community-wide commitment.

What carries the argument

The born-qualified framework, which integrates four pillars—multi-objective metrics, causal models, modular infrastructure, and manufacturing-embedded discovery—to ensure industrial viability from the start.

Load-bearing premise

That the four pillars of multi-objective metrics, causal models, modular infrastructure, and manufacturing integration will together be enough to bridge the valley of death, assuming sustained community support follows.

What would settle it

Observing that materials developed under a fully implemented born-qualified system still predominantly fail to reach industrial deployment would indicate the approach is insufficient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00639 by Andrew Young, Andriy Zakutayev, Axel Palmstrom, Ayana Ghosh, Brooks Tellekamp, Daniela Ushizima, Davi M. F\'ebba, E. Ashley Gaulding, Frederick Baddour, Grace Guinan, Hilary Egan, John S. Mangum, Kenny Gruchalla, Matthew J. Olszta, Michael Holden, Michelle A. Smeaton, Milad Abolhasani, Nathaniel H. Park, Nicholas E. Thornburg, Patrick Emami, Rama K. Vasudevan, Raymond R. Unocic, Renae Gannon, Robert W. Epps, Robert White, Ryan B. Comes, Sergei V. Kalinin, Steven R. Spurgeon, Taro Hitosugi, Vinayak P. Dravid, Yangang Liang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The Discovery–Deployment Gap in Energy and Electronic Technologies. (a–c) Bars compare commercial product performance, laboratory system and component records, and theoretical limits for key photovoltaic, battery, and power electronic technologies. Percentages indicate estimated market share. X/SSB/Y denotes solid-state battery; electrode chemistry varies by formulation and is detailed in the accompanying … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Traditional Vs. Born-Qualified Discovery. Comparison of sequential and born-qualified approaches, showing how a linear decision-making process fails to anticipate challenges in scale-up, while a multi-objective approach can more effectively produce feasible designs. Four Enabling Pillars We identify four enabling pillars, summarized in Box 1, that collectively reframe the process of discovery from mere nov… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Autonomous science is transforming how we discover materials and chemical systems for advanced energy technologies. However, many initially promising systems never reach deployment. This "valley of death" stems from optimization that prioritizes laboratory metrics over industrial viability. We propose a new strategy: "born-qualified" autonomous development, which embeds manufacturability, cost, and durability constraints from the outset. This approach is enabled by four pillars, including the development of multi-objective metrics, causal models, a modular infrastructure, and embedding manufacturing in the discovery loop. Realizing this vision will require sustained, community-wide commitment, but the potential return on that investment is commensurate with the scale of the challenge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a vision paper that names a 'born-qualified' strategy and four pillars for autonomous materials work but supplies no data, models, or tests to show it works.

read the letter

The core point is that this manuscript is a high-level proposal, not a research report. It argues that autonomous labs should bake in manufacturability, cost, and durability constraints right from the start instead of optimizing lab metrics and hoping they translate later. The authors call this 'born-qualified' development and lay out four supporting ideas: multi-objective metrics, causal models, modular infrastructure, and closing the loop with manufacturing early. That framing is the only real novelty here; the individual pillars recycle ideas already circulating in the autonomous science and materials informatics communities. The paper does a clean job of naming the valley-of-death problem and sketching why current discovery pipelines often fail at scale. The writing is straightforward and the author list shows broad buy-in from people who actually run these labs. That said, the argument stays entirely conceptual. There are no case studies, no quantitative comparisons, no implementation details, and no discussion of what would count as success or failure for any of the pillars. The claim that these four elements will be sufficient rests on an untested assumption about community coordination and sustained funding. Without even a toy example or a roadmap, it is hard to judge whether the proposal moves the needle or simply restates known bottlenecks in fancier language. Readers already working on closed-loop experimentation or multi-objective optimization will find little new technical content. The piece is mainly useful for program managers or lab directors who want a concise way to talk about shifting priorities. It deserves a serious referee process if the target venue has a perspectives or vision section, because the topic is timely and the authors have the right expertise. I would not cite it for any technical claim, but I would bring it to a reading group to discuss whether the field needs this kind of framing exercise or more concrete demonstrations instead.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 'born-qualified' autonomous development strategy for materials and chemical systems in advanced energy technologies. It identifies the 'valley of death' as arising from lab-focused optimization that neglects industrial viability, and advocates embedding manufacturability, cost, and durability constraints from the outset. This is enabled by four pillars: multi-objective metrics, causal models, modular infrastructure, and embedding manufacturing in the discovery loop. The paper concludes that sustained community-wide commitment is needed to realize the vision, with potential returns matching the challenge scale.

Significance. If implemented, the born-qualified framework could meaningfully reduce the gap between laboratory discovery and deployment by prioritizing deployable materials early, potentially speeding progress in energy and electronic materials. The emphasis on causal models and multi-objective optimization offers a conceptual advance over purely performance-driven autonomous systems. However, as the manuscript contains no implementations, case studies, algorithms, or validation, any significance remains prospective and dependent on future work.

major comments (2)

[The four pillars (main body, following abstract)] The central claim that the four pillars (multi-objective metrics, causal models, modular infrastructure, and embedding manufacturing in the discovery loop) are sufficient to overcome the valley of death is presented without any supporting analysis, examples, or references. No section demonstrates how these elements would integrate or address specific barriers such as data scarcity for causal durability models.
[Vision and conclusion sections] The manuscript asserts that community-wide commitment will yield returns commensurate with the challenge, but provides no discussion of implementation risks, such as standardization of modular infrastructure or availability of manufacturing data for the discovery loop. This leaves the feasibility of the proposal unexamined.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and insightful review of our manuscript. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the potential impact of the born-qualified framework and address the major comments below with planned revisions to strengthen the presentation of this conceptual proposal.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the four pillars (multi-objective metrics, causal models, modular infrastructure, and embedding manufacturing in the discovery loop) are sufficient to overcome the valley of death is presented without any supporting analysis, examples, or references. No section demonstrates how these elements would integrate or address specific barriers such as data scarcity for causal durability models.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents a high-level conceptual framework rather than detailed implementations or empirical demonstrations. The four pillars are proposed as essential components derived from observed limitations in current autonomous discovery pipelines. In revision, we will augment the main body sections on the pillars with additional references to prior work on multi-objective optimization in materials science and causal inference methods for durability. We will also explicitly note data scarcity as a key open challenge for causal durability models and describe how the modular infrastructure pillar could facilitate incremental integration. These changes will clarify the proposal's scope without claiming sufficiency beyond the conceptual level. revision: partial
Referee: The manuscript asserts that community-wide commitment will yield returns commensurate with the challenge, but provides no discussion of implementation risks, such as standardization of modular infrastructure or availability of manufacturing data for the discovery loop. This leaves the feasibility of the proposal unexamined.

Authors: We concur that a balanced discussion of risks would improve the manuscript. We will expand the vision and conclusion sections to include a dedicated paragraph on implementation challenges, such as the difficulties of achieving standardization for modular infrastructure and the current paucity of accessible manufacturing data suitable for closed-loop discovery. This addition will temper the feasibility assessment while preserving the argument that the potential benefits justify the required community effort. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a high-level vision paper with no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or mathematical claims. The 'born-qualified' proposal and its four pillars are presented as conceptual recommendations without any reduction to self-referential definitions, self-citations, or prior results by construction. The central argument remains independent and does not collapse into its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on domain assumptions about the feasibility of the four pillars and the existence of a solvable valley of death; no free parameters or data-driven fits are present.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Embedding manufacturability, cost, and durability constraints early will close the gap between lab metrics and industrial deployment.
Invoked as the core motivation and solution in the abstract.
ad hoc to paper The four pillars are both necessary and sufficient to enable born-qualified development.
Presented as the enabling structure without further justification.

invented entities (1)

born-qualified autonomous development no independent evidence
purpose: A named strategy that integrates industrial constraints into autonomous discovery from the outset.
New term coined to describe the overall approach.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5562 in / 1231 out tokens · 29091 ms · 2026-05-09T19:38:16.111985+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055(2024)

Tom, G.et al.Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science.Chemical Reviews 124,9633–9732. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055(2024)

work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055(2024 2024
[2]

H.et al.Toward Autonomous Materials Research: Recent Progress and Future Chal- lenges.Applied Physics Reviews9,011405

Montoya, J. H.et al.Toward Autonomous Materials Research: Recent Progress and Future Chal- lenges.Applied Physics Reviews9,011405. doi:10.1063/5.0076324(Mar. 2022)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0076324(mar 2022
[3]

R.et al.Targeted materials discovery using Bayesian algorithm execution.npj Comput

Chitturi, S. R.et al.Targeted materials discovery using Bayesian algorithm execution.npj Comput. Mater.10,164. doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01326-2(2024)

work page doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01326-2(2024 2024
[4]

doi:10.1038/s41560-025-01720-0(2025)

Kim, J.-H.et al.Upscaling high-areal-capacity battery electrodes.Nature Energy10,295–307. doi:10.1038/s41560-025-01720-0(2025)

work page doi:10.1038/s41560-025-01720-0(2025 2025
[5]

S.et al.The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122,e2401231121

Trueblood, J. S.et al.The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122,e2401231121. doi:10.1073/ pnas.2401231121(2025)

2025
[6]

National Laboratory of the Rockies.Autonomous Research for Real-World Science (ARROWS) Workshophttps : / / www . nlr . gov / materials - science / autonomous - research - for - real - world-science-workshop. Accessed: 2026-04-29. Golden, CO, 2025

2026
[7]

doi:10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.036(2021)

Stach, E.et al.Autonomous Experimentation Systems for Materials Development: A Community Perspective.Matter4,2702–2726. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.036(2021)

work page doi:10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.036(2021 2021
[8]

C., Collison, C

Ramos, M. C., Collison, C. J. & White, A. D. A Review of Large Language Models and Autonomous Agents in Chemistry.Chemical Science16,2514–2572. doi:10.1039/D4SC03921A(2025)

work page doi:10.1039/d4sc03921a(2025 2025
[9]

M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L

Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L. & Cronin, L. Controlling an Organic Synthesis Robot with Machine Learning to Search for New Reactivity.Nature559,377–381. doi:10.1038/ s41586-018-0307-8(July 2018)

2018
[10]

P.et al.Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials.Sci- ence Advances6,eaaz8867

MacLeod, B. P.et al.Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials.Sci- ence Advances6,eaaz8867. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8867(2020)

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8867(2020 2020
[11]

Dai, T.et al.Autonomous mobile robots for exploratory synthetic chemistry.Nature635,890–
[12]

doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08173-7(2024)

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08173-7(2024 2024
[13]

W.et al.Artificial Chemist: An Autonomous Quantum Dot Synthesis Bot.Advanced Materials32,2001626

Epps, R. W.et al.Artificial Chemist: An Autonomous Quantum Dot Synthesis Bot.Advanced Materials32,2001626. doi:10.1002/adma.202001626(July 2020)

work page doi:10.1002/adma.202001626(july 2020
[14]

& Hitosugi, T

Shimizu, R., Kobayashi, S., Watanabe, Y., Ando, Y. & Hitosugi, T. Autonomous Materials Syn- thesis by Machine Learning and Robotics.APL Materials8,111110. doi:10 . 1063 / 5 . 0020370 (Nov. 2020)

2020
[15]

J.et al.An Autonomous Laboratory for the Accelerated Synthesis of Inorganic Materials.Nature624,86–91

Szymanski, N. J.et al.An Autonomous Laboratory for the Accelerated Synthesis of Inorganic Materials.Nature624,86–91. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w(Dec. 2023)

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w(dec 2023
[16]

Baliga, B. J. Power semiconductor device figure of merit for high-frequency applications.IEEE Electron Device Lett.10,455–457. doi:10.1109/55.43098(1989)

work page doi:10.1109/55.43098(1989 1989
[17]

doi:10.1109/IRECON.1965.1147520

Johnson, E.Physical Limitations on Frequency and Power Parameters of TransistorsinIRE In- ternational Convention Record13(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, USA, 1965), 27–34. doi:10.1109/IRECON.1965.1147520. 11

work page doi:10.1109/irecon.1965.1147520 1965
[18]

doi:10.3389/fenrg.2019.00123(2019)

Zhu, K.et al.How Far Away Are Lithium-Sulfur Batteries From Commercialization?Frontiers in Energy Research7,123. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2019.00123(2019)

work page doi:10.3389/fenrg.2019.00123(2019 2019
[19]

O., Colon, A

Kazmer, D. O., Colon, A. R., Peterson, A. M. & Kim, S. K. Concurrent Characterization of Com- pressibility and Viscosity in Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene with Fault Diagnoses.Additive Manufacturing46,102106. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021. 102106(Oct. 2021)

work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021 2021
[20]

National Science and Technology Council.Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness tech. rep. (Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C., June 2011)

2011
[21]

H.et al.Risk Minimization in Scale-Up of Biomass and Waste Carbon Upgrading Pro- cesses.ACS Sustainable Chem

Miller, J. H.et al.Risk Minimization in Scale-Up of Biomass and Waste Carbon Upgrading Pro- cesses.ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.12,666–679. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c06231(2024)

work page doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c06231(2024 2024
[22]

Garcez, A. d. & Lamb, L. C. Neurosymbolic AI: the 3rd wave.Artificial Intelligence Review56, 12387–12406. doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10448-w(2023)

work page doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10448-w(2023 2023
[23]

A.et al.Hypothesis Learning in Automated Experiment: Application to Combinato- rial Materials Libraries.Advanced Materials34,e2201345

Ziatdinov, M. A.et al.Hypothesis Learning in Automated Experiment: Application to Combinato- rial Materials Libraries.Advanced Materials34,e2201345. doi:10.1002/adma.202201345. eprint: 2112.06649(2022)

work page doi:10.1002/adma.202201345 2022
[24]

P., Shaikh, M

Ghosh, A., Palanichamy, G., Trujillo, D. P., Shaikh, M. & Ghosh, S. Insights into cation ordering of double perovskite oxides from machine learning and causal relations.Chem. Mater.34,7563–
[25]

doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00217(2022)

work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00217(2022 2022
[26]

V., Ghosh, A., Vasudevan, R

Kalinin, S. V., Ghosh, A., Vasudevan, R. K. & Ziatdinov, M. From atomically resolved imaging to generative and causal models.Nat. Phys.18,1152–1160. doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01666-0 (2022)

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01666-0 2022
[27]

Towards physics-informed explainable machine learning and causal models for materials research.Comput

Ghosh, A. Towards physics-informed explainable machine learning and causal models for materials research.Comput. Mater. Sci.233,112740. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112740(2024)

work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112740(2024 2023
[28]

& Ghosh, S

Ghosh, A. & Ghosh, S. Mapping causal pathways with structural modes fingerprint for perovskite oxides.Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol.5,045014. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad7d5e(2024)

work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad7d5e(2024 2024
[29]

& Ghosh, S

Ghosh, A., Gayathri, P., Buvaneswaran, S. & Ghosh, S. Causal Reasoning for Controlling Polar- ization Switching in Hybrid Improper Ferroelectrics.Chem. Mater.38,619–629. doi:10.1021/ acs.chemmater.5c01737(2026)

2026
[30]

Fox, Z. R. & Ghosh, A. Active causal learning for decoding chemical complexities with targeted interventions.Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol.5,035056. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad6feb(2024)

work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad6feb(2024 2024
[31]

Mater.6,127

Ziatdinov, M.et al.Causal analysis of competing atomistic mechanisms in ferroelectric materials from high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy data.npj Comput. Mater.6,127. doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00396-2(2020)

work page doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00396-2(2020 2020
[32]

Barakati, K.et al.Causal discovery from data assisted by large language models.Appl. Phys. Lett. 127,121904. doi:10.1063/5.0272287(2025)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0272287(2025 2025
[33]

F´ ebba, D., Egbo, K., Callahan, W. A. & Zakutayev, A. From text to test: AI-generated control software for materials science instruments.Digital Discovery4,35–45. doi:10.1039/d4dd00143e. eprint:2406.16224(2024). 12

work page doi:10.1039/d4dd00143e 2024
[34]

L.et al.Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies.Applied Physics Reviews4,011105

Green, M. L.et al.Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies.Applied Physics Reviews4,011105. doi:10.1063/1.4977487(2017)

work page doi:10.1063/1.4977487(2017 2017
[35]

Foadian, E., Sanchez, S., Kalinin, S. V. & Ahmadi, M. From Sunlight to Solutions: Closing the Loop on Halide Perovskites.ACS Materials Au5,11–23. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00096 (2025)

work page doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00096 2025
[36]

doi:10.1063/5.0267699(2025)

Guinan, G.et al.Mind the Gap: Bridging the Divide between AI Aspirations and the Reality of Autonomous Microscopy.APL Machine Learning3,020903. doi:10.1063/5.0267699(2025)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0267699(2025 2025
[37]

Guinan, G.et al.Revealing the hidden third dimension of point defects in two-dimensional MXenes. Nat. Commun.17,3473. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71670-y(2026)

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71670-y(2026 2026
[38]

R.et al.Towards data-driven next-generation transmission electron microscopy.Na- ture Materials20.http://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-020-00833-z, 274–279

Spurgeon, S. R.et al.Towards data-driven next-generation transmission electron microscopy.Na- ture Materials20.http://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-020-00833-z, 274–279. doi:10 . 1038 / s41563-020-00833-z(Mar. 2021)

2021
[39]

B., Gemperline, P

Harris, S. B., Gemperline, P. T., Rouleau, C. M., Vasudevan, R. K. & Comes, R. B. Deep Learn- ing with Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction Images to Predict Cation Ratio in Sr 2x Ti 2(1–x) O3 Thin Films.Nano Letters25,5867–5874. doi:10 . 1021 / acs . nanolett . 5c00787 (Apr. 2025)

2025
[40]

C.et al.Machine-Learning-Enabled on-the-Fly Analysis of RHEED Patterns during Thin Film Deposition by Molecular Beam Epitaxy.Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 43,032702

Kaspar, T. C.et al.Machine-Learning-Enabled on-the-Fly Analysis of RHEED Patterns during Thin Film Deposition by Molecular Beam Epitaxy.Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 43,032702. doi:10.1116/6.0004493(May 2025)

work page doi:10.1116/6.0004493(may 2025
[41]

Liang, H.et al.Application of Machine Learning to Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction Images for Automated Structural Phase Mapping.Physical Review Materials6,063805. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.063805(June 2022)

2022
[42]

& Haffner, P

Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. & Haffner, P. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition.Proceedings of the IEEE86,2278–2324. doi:10.1109/5.726791(Nov. 1998)

work page doi:10.1109/5.726791(nov 1998
[43]

Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding

Hendrycks, D.et al. Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding2020. doi:10.48550/ ARXIV.2009.03300

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2009
[44]

K., Nag, A

Saha, S., Hota, A., Chattopadhyay, A. K., Nag, A. & Nandi, S. A Multifaceted Survey on Privacy Preservation of Federated Learning: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities.Artificial Intelligence Review57,184. doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10766-7(June 2024). 13 Acknowledgments S.R.S. would like to thank Nicole Bryant and Harrison Dreves for their help organizing...

work page doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10766-7(june 2024