pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01692 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Spin caloritronics: History and future prospects of experiments

Ken-ichi Uchida , Takamasa Hirai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords spin caloritronicsspin Seebeck effectthermal spin transportspin-charge-heat interactionsthermoelectric effectsspintronicsmaterials scienceenergy conversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin caloritronics is transitioning from fundamental condensed matter physics to materials science and applied research.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the history of spin caloritronics since the early 21st century, focusing on experimental discoveries of transport phenomena that arise from interactions among heat, charge, and spin. It surveys key effects and measurement approaches before outlining prospects in techniques, physics, materials, and devices. A sympathetic reader would care because this frames an emerging field as ready to move beyond initial discoveries into practical material engineering. The central claim is that the area has reached a stage where both deeper fundamental work and real applications can advance together. If the assessment holds, research efforts will increasingly target optimized materials and engineering uses of these coupled transport effects.

Core claim

The authors establish that spin caloritronics combines spintronics with thermal transport and thermoelectric properties through the discovery of novel energy conversion and control principles based on heat-charge-spin interactions. After tracing the experimental history of these phenomena, the paper concludes that the field is now at a turning point, moving from fundamental condensed matter physics into materials science, with further development expected in measurement methods, underlying physics, material design, and engineering applications.

What carries the argument

The coupling of spin, charge, and heat currents in magnetic and spintronic materials that produces observable transport effects such as the spin Seebeck effect.

If this is right

  • Measurement techniques will be refined to characterize thermal spin transport more precisely.
  • Physics research will identify additional mechanisms of heat-charge-spin coupling.
  • Materials science will produce compounds engineered for stronger thermoelectric and spin responses.
  • Engineering will develop devices that exploit these effects for energy conversion and control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration with conventional thermoelectric materials could create hybrid systems for waste-heat recovery.
  • Device-level testing of candidate materials would reveal whether the anticipated applications are realistic.
  • Industry interest in low-power electronics might accelerate material development if the prospects section guides targeted experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The authors' reading of recent trends as evidence of a lasting shift from fundamental physics to materials science and applications, rather than a continuation of basic discoveries.

What would settle it

If the next five to ten years produce no measurable increase in papers or patents on optimized materials and device prototypes, with research remaining centered on new fundamental phenomena, the turning-point claim would not be supported.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01692 by Ken-ichi Uchida, Takamasa Hirai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Physical phenomena discovered in spin caloritronics and cities hosting the International Workshop on Spin Caloritronics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Conversion phenomena between the charge current, heat current, conduction-electron spin current, and magnon spin current and their categorization. −e and Q denote the electron charge and heat, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Schematic of ANE in a magnetic conductor. (b) Schematic of the inverse spin Hall effect induced by SSE in a junction structure comprising a metallic film and magnetic insulator or conductor. 𝑇, M, EANE(ISHE), and Js denote the temperature gradient, magnetization vector, electric field induced by ANE (inverse spin Hall effect), and spatial direction of a spin current, respectively. (c) Numbers of publi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a),(b) Schematic of thermal transport engineerring in ferromagnetic metal (FM)/insulator junctions via nonequilibrium magnon spin currents. Depending on the boundary condition for Js, the thermal conductivity  of FM (FM) in a FM/nonmagnetic insulator junction (a) differs from that in a FM/magnetic insulator junction (b). Jq denotes the heat current. (c),(d) FM and interfacial thermal conductance G in C… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Lock-in thermography as a tool for investigating spin caloritronics. Spin-caloritronic phenomena that outputs a heat current or heat absorption/release can be measured by the lock-in thermography method. Jc and H denote the charge current and magnetic field vector, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Linear response magneto-thermoelectric, thermo-spin, and Thomson effects in spin caloritronics for the longitudinal effects (a) and the transverse effects (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Schematic of the Seebeck-effect-driven anomalous Hall effect (Seebeck-driven transverse magneto￾thermoelectric generation) in the closed-loop junction comprising magnetic and thermoelectric materials. (b) Measured transverse thermopower in the closed-loop junctions comprising a ferromagnetic metal film (Co2MnGa or FePt) and Si substrate [82]. Stot and SANE denote the total transverse thermopower in the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Since the beginning of the 21st century, novel energy conversion and control principles utilizing the spin degree of freedom have been discovered in the field of spin caloritronics, which integrates spintronics with thermal transport and thermoelectric properties. In this article, we review the history of development of spin caloritronics and experimental studies on various transport phenomena caused by heat-charge-spin interactions. We then discuss future prospects in spin caloritronics from the viewpoints of measurement techniques, physics, materials science, and engineering applications. Spin caloritronics is now at a turning point, transitioning from fundamental condensed matter physics to materials science, and further development is anticipated in both fundamental and applied research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the development of spin caloritronics since the early 21st century, summarizing experimental studies on transport phenomena arising from heat-charge-spin interactions. It then outlines future prospects from the perspectives of measurement techniques, fundamental physics, materials science, and engineering applications, concluding that the field is at a turning point transitioning from condensed matter physics to materials science with anticipated progress in both fundamental and applied directions.

Significance. As a review synthesizing prior experimental literature, the work could serve as a useful reference for consolidating the history of spin caloritronics and framing its potential directions. Its value is in providing an integrated overview rather than new quantitative results or derivations; the interpretive assessment of a 'turning point' would gain strength from explicit linkage to specific trends in the cited experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and likely the concluding section): The central claim that spin caloritronics 'is now at a turning point, transitioning from fundamental condensed matter physics to materials science' is presented as a synthesis of trends but lacks explicit quantitative support such as citation statistics, publication volume shifts, or concrete examples of the transition in the reviewed experiments. This interpretive statement is load-bearing for the forward-looking discussion and should be grounded with specific references to recent works.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists four viewpoints for future prospects (measurement techniques, physics, materials science, engineering) but does not preview which specific phenomena or materials will be highlighted; adding one or two concrete examples would improve clarity for readers.
  2. Ensure that all historical experimental milestones cited in the review are accompanied by precise references to the original papers, particularly for key discoveries in spin Seebeck effect or related phenomena, to allow verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and likely the concluding section): The central claim that spin caloritronics 'is now at a turning point, transitioning from fundamental condensed matter physics to materials science' is presented as a synthesis of trends but lacks explicit quantitative support such as citation statistics, publication volume shifts, or concrete examples of the transition in the reviewed experiments. This interpretive statement is load-bearing for the forward-looking discussion and should be grounded with specific references to recent works.

    Authors: We agree that adding concrete examples will strengthen the interpretive claim. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the abstract and concluding section with specific references to recent experimental works that illustrate the shift, including studies on optimized thermoelectric materials for spin Seebeck devices and integration of spin caloritronic phenomena into practical material platforms. These additions will provide explicit linkage to the reviewed literature without requiring new quantitative analyses such as citation counts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review of existing literature

full rationale

This paper is a historical review and forward-looking discussion of spin caloritronics experiments. It contains no mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or new quantitative predictions. The central claim that the field is at a turning point is an interpretive synthesis of published trends from external literature, not a result that reduces to any input defined within the paper. No self-citations are load-bearing for a derivation, no ansatzes are smuggled, and no known results are renamed as novel. The work is self-contained as a summary without an internal derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper. No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5411 in / 1017 out tokens · 41822 ms · 2026-05-10T16:02:58.829954+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Johnson, R

    M. Johnson, R. H. Silsbee, Phys. Rev. B 35 (1987) 4959

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    Hatami, G

    M. Hatami, G. E. W. Bauer, Q. Zhang, P. J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 066603

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Ha rii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Nature 455 (2008) 778

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Uchida, R

    K. Uchida, R. Iguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90 (2021) 122001

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    K. F. Cuff, R. B. Horst, J. L. Weaver, S. R. Hawkins, C. F. Kooi, G. M. Enslow, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2 (1963) 145

    work page 1963

  6. [6]

    Jandl, U

    P. Jandl, U. Birkholz, J. Appl. Phys. 76 (1994) 7351

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Y. Pan, B. He, T. Helm, D. Chen, W. Schnelle, C. Felser, Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 3909

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    J. P. Jan, in Solid State Physics, Vol. 5 (eds., F. Seitz and D. Turnbull) (1957) 1-96

    work page 1957

  9. [9]

    K. S. Das, F. K. Dejene, B. J. van Wees, I. J. Vera-Marun, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) 180403(R)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Daimon, R. Iguchi, E. Saitoh, Nature 558 (2018) 95

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Uchida, W

    K. Uchida, W. Zhou, Y. Sakuraba, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021) 140504

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Sakai, S

    A. Sakai, S. Nakatsuji, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 26 (2025) 2554047

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Kikkawa, K

    T. Kikkawa, K. Uchida, Y. Shiomi, Z. Qiu, D. Hou, D. Tian, H. Nakayama, X.-F. Jin, E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 067207

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki , D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, S. Nakatsuji, Nat. Phys. 13 (2017) 1085

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Sakai, Y

    A. Sakai, Y. P. Mizuta, A. A. Nugroho, R. Sihombing, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, N. Takemori, R. Ishii, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, P. Goswami, S. Nakatsuji, Nat. Phys. 14 (2018) 1119

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    P. W. Bridgman, Phys. Rev. 24 (1924) 644

    work page 1924

  17. [17]

    E. H. Hall, Phys. Rev. 26 (1925) 820

    work page 1925

  18. [18]

    T. Seki, R. Iguchi, K. Takanashi, K. Uchida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 (2018) 152403

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Miura, H

    A. Miura, H. Sepehri-Amin, K. Masuda, H. Tsuc hiura, Y. Miura, R. Iguchi, Y. Sakuraba, J. Shiomi, K. Hono, K. Uchida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 (2019) 222403

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    F. Ando, T. Hirai, K. Uchida, APL Energy 2 (2024) 016103

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    W. Zhou, Y. Sakuraba, Appl. Phys. Express 13 (2020) 043001

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Tanaka, T

    H. Tanaka, T. Higo, R. Uesugi, K. Yamagata, Y. Nakanishi, H. Machinaga, S. Nakatsuji, Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) 2303416

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Nakayama, B

    H. Nakayama, B. Xu, S. Iwamoto, K. Yamamoto, R. Iguchi, A. Miur a, T. Hirai, Y. Miura, Y. 18 Sakuraba, J. Shiomi, K. Uchida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021) 042409

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Makino, T

    F. Makino, T. Hirai, T. Shiga, H. Suto, H. Fuji hisa, K. Oyanagi, S. Kobayashi, T. Sasaki, T. Yagi, K. Uchida, Y. Sakuraba, Phys. Rev. B 112 (2025) 054407

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    X. Wu, Z. Liu, T. Luo, J. Appl. Phys. 123 (2018) 085109

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    M. R. Natale, D. J. Wesenberg, E. R. J. Edwards, H. T. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, B. L. Zink, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 (2021) L111401

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Hirai, T

    T. Hirai, T. Morita, S. Biswas, J. Uzuhashi, T. Yagi, Y. Yamashita, V. K. Kushwaha, F. Makino, R. Modak, Y. Sakuraba, T. Ohkubo, R. Guo, B. Xu, J. Shiomi, D. Chiba, K. Uchida, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (2025) 2506554

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Ramos, T

    R. Ramos, T. Kikkawa, M. H. Aguirre, I. Lucas , A. Anadón, T. Oyake, K. Uchida, H. Adachi, J. Shiomi, P. A. Algarabel, L. Morellón, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, M. R. Ibarra, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 220407(R)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Nomura, J

    M. Nomura, J. Shiomi, T. Shiga, R. Anufriev, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 57 (2018) 080101

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Strohm, G

    C. Strohm, G. L. J. A. Rikken, P. Wyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 155901

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, Y. Tokura, Science 329 (2010) 297

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Kasahara, T

    Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, Sixiao Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, Nature 559 (2018) 227

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Slachter, F

    A. Slachter, F. L. Bakker, J-P. Adam, B. J. van Wees, Nat. Phys. 6 (2010) 879

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Le Breton, S

    J.-C. Le Breton, S. Sharma, H. Saito, S. Yuasa, R. Jansen, Nature 475 (2011) 82

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Flipse, F

    J. Flipse, F. L. Bakker, A. Slachter, F. K. De jene, B. J. van Wees, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 (2012) 166

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    F. K. Dejene, J. Flipse, G. E. W. Bauer, B. J. van Wees, Nat. Phys. 9 (2013) 636

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Azevedo, L

    A. Azevedo, L. H. Vilela Leão, R. L. Rodriguez-Suarez, A. B. Oliveira, S. M. Rezende, J. Appl. Phys. 97 (2005) 10C715

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Saitoh, M

    E. Saitoh, M. Ueda, H. Miyajima, G. Tatara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 182509

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    Uchida, J

    K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y. Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, G. E. W. Bauer, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Nat. Mater. 9 (2010) 894

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    Uchida, H

    K. Uchida, H. Adachi, T. Ota, H. Nakayama, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 (2010) 172505

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    J. Xiao, G. E. W. Bauer, K. Uchida, E. Saitoh, S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 214418

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Adachi, J

    H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 094410

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Flipse, F

    J. Flipse, F. K. Dejene, D. Wagenaar, G. E. W. Bauer, J. Ben Youssef, B. J. van Wees, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 027601

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Daimon, R

    S. Daimon, R. Iguchi, T. Hioki, E. Saitoh, K. Uchida, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 13754

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Kikkawa, K

    T. Kikkawa, K. Uchida, S. Daimon, Z. Qiu, Y. Shiomi, E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2025) 064413. 19

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    H. Jin, S. R. Boona, Z. Yang, R. C. Myers, J. P. Heremans, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 054436

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    S. M. Wu, J. E. Pearson, A. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 186602

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    S. Seki, T. Ideue, M. Kubota, Y. Kozuka, R. Takagi, M. Nakamura, Y. Kaneko, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 266601

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Takagi, Y

    R. Takagi, Y. Tokunaga, T. Ideue, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, S. Seki, APL Mater. 4 (2016) 032502

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Hirobe, M

    D. Hirobe, M. Sato, T. Kawamata, Y. Shiomi, K. Uchida, R. Iguchi, Y. Koike, S. Maekawa, E. Saitoh, Nat. Phys. 13 (2017) 30

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    Y. Chen, M. Sato, Y. Tang, Y. Shiomi, K. Oyanagi, T. Masuda, Y. Nambu, M. Fujita, E. Saitoh, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 5199

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Kikkawa, D

    T. Kikkawa, D. Reitz, H. Ito, T. Makiuchi, T. Sugimoto, K. Tsunekawa, S. Daimon, K. Oyanagi, R. Ramos, S. Takahashi, Y. Shiomi, Y. Tserkovnyak, E. Saitoh, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 4356

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Kikkawa, K

    T. Kikkawa, K. Shen, B. Flebus, R. A. Duine, K. Uchida, Z. Qi u, G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 207203

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    T. An, V. I. Vasyuchka, K. Uchida, A. V. Chum ak, K. Yamaguchi, K. Harii, J. Ohe, M. B. Jungfleisch, Y. Kajiwara, H. Adachi, B. Hillebra nds, S. Maekawa, E. Sa itoh, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013) 549

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Kainuma, R

    Y. Kainuma, R. Iguchi, D. Prananto, V. I. Vasyuchka, B. Hillebrands, T. An, K. Uchida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021) 222404

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Breitenstein, W

    O. Breitenstein, W. Warta, M. Langenkam p, Lock-in Thermography: Basics and Use for Evaluating Electronic Devices and Materials 2nd edn, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2010

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    O. Wid, J. Bauer, A. Müller, O. Breitenstein, S. S. P. Parkin, G. Schmidt, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 28233

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Iguchi, D

    R. Iguchi, D. Fukuda, J. Kano, T. Teranishi, K. Uchida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 (2023) 082903

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Uchida, M

    K. Uchida, M. Murata, A. Miura, R. Iguchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 106601

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Modak, T

    R. Modak, T. Hirai, S. Mitani, K. Uchida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 206701

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Takahagi, T

    A. Takahagi, T. Hirai, A. Alasli, S. J. Park, H. Nagano, K. Uchida, Nat. Phys. 21 (2025) 1283

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Imamura, T

    T. Imamura, T. Hirai, K. Oyanagi, R. Iguchi, K. Takamori, S. Kobayashi, K. Uchida, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23 (2025) 024018

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Yamazaki, R

    T. Yamazaki, R. Iguchi, T. Ohkubo, H. Nagano, K. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 020415(R)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Völkl, A

    T. Völkl, A. Aharon-Steinberg, T. Holder, E. Alpern, N. Banu, A. K. Pariari, Y. Myasoedov, M. E. Huber, M. Hücker, E. Zeldov, Nat. Phys. 20 (2024) 976

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Razeghi, J

    M. Razeghi, J. Spiece, V. Fonck, Y. Zhang, M. Rohde, R. Joris, P. S. Dobson, J. M. R. Weaver, L. M. C. Pereira, S. Granville, P. Gehring, ACS Nano 19 (2025) 39725

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    A. J. Schmidt, X. Chen, G. Chen, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 (2008) 114902

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    Chiritescu, D

    C. Chiritescu, D. G. Cahill, N. Nguyen, D. Johnson, A. Bodapati, P. Keblinski, P. Zschack, Science 315 (2007) 351. 20

    work page 2007

  68. [68]

    S. E. Kim, F. Mujid, A. Rai, F. Eriksson, J. Suh, P. Poddar, A. Ray, C. Park, E. Fransson, Y. Zhong, D. A. Muller, P. Erhart, D. G. Cahill, J. Park, Nature 597 (2021) 660

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    P. Tang, K. Uchida, G. E. W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. B 111 (2025) L180407

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Meyer, Y.-T

    S. Meyer, Y.-T. Chen, S. Wimmer, M. Althammer, T. Wimmer, R. Schlitz, S. Geprägs, H. Huebl, D. Ködderitzsch, H. Ebert, G. E. W. Bauer, R. Gross, S. T. B. Goennenwein, Nat. Mater. 16 (2017) 977

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Sheng, Y

    P. Sheng, Y. Sakuraba, Y.-C. Lau, S. Takahashi, S. Mitani, M. Hayashi, Sci. Adv. 3 (2017) e1701503

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Kim, C.-Y

    D.-J. Kim, C.-Y. Jeon, J.-G. Choi, J. W. Lee, S. Surabhi, J.-R. Jeong, K.-J. Lee, B.-G. Park, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1400

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    Arisawa, Y

    H. Arisawa, Y. Fujimoto, T. Kikkawa, E. Saitoh, Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 6912

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    Hirata, T

    Y. Hirata, T. Kikkawa, H. Arisawa, E. Saitoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126 (2025) 252408

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    G. E. W. Bauer, R. Iguchi, K. Uchida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 187603

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    B. L. Wooten, R. Iguchi, P. Tang, J. S. Kang, K. Uchida, G. E. W. Bauer, J. P. Heremans, Sci. Adv. 9 (2023) add7194

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Adachi, N

    H. Adachi, N. Ikeda, E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 155142

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    P. Tang, K. Uchida, G. E. W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) L121406

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Uchida, J

    K. Uchida, J. P. Heremans, Joule 6 (2022) 2240

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Adachi, F

    H. Adachi, F. Ando, T. Hirai, R. Modak, M. Grayson, K. Uchida, Appl. Phys. Express 18 (2025) 090101

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.