pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02360 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall

Free-standing circular Bragg gratings enabling efficient GaAs quantum dot entangled photon pair sources

Sai Abhishikth Dhurjati , Moritz Langer , Yared G. Zena , Ahmad Rahimi , Liesa Raith , Martin Bauer , Frank H. P. Fitzek , Riccardo Bassoli
show 1 more author
Caspar Hopfmann
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords circular Bragg gratingsGaAs quantum dotsentangled photon pairsaspect-ratio-dependent etchingstrain relaxationphotoluminescence enhancementfine-structure splittingquantum light sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

Single-step etching creates free-standing Bragg gratings that boost GaAs quantum dot emission 700-fold and cut fine-structure splitting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how a minimal fabrication route using aspect-ratio-dependent etching produces monolithic, suspended circular Bragg gratings around deterministically placed GaAs quantum dots. This geometry supplies the vertical asymmetry needed for directional light extraction without added reflector layers or bonding steps. The suspended structure also relaxes built-in strain, lowering the average exciton fine-structure splitting while keeping coherence times intact. A reader would care because these changes turn the dots into brighter, more usable sources of entangled photon pairs for quantum networks that must scale without complex processing.

Core claim

Utilizing aspect-ratio-dependent etching in a single-step top-down process realizes free-standing circular Bragg grating cavities with deterministically positioned GaAs quantum dots; the geometry delivers free-space extraction efficiencies up to 68 percent and fiber coupling up to 40 percent, experimentally yielding photoluminescence enhancements up to 700 times, integrated count rates of 45 MHz, and a drop in average exciton fine-structure splitting from 7.3 to 1.3 micro-electronvolts while preserving 70-picosecond coherence times.

What carries the argument

The free-standing circular Bragg grating formed by single-step aspect-ratio-dependent etching, which simultaneously creates vertical asymmetry for directional emission and relaxes residual strain through the suspended membrane.

If this is right

  • Photoluminescence intensity rises by up to 700 times relative to unprocessed planar quantum dots.
  • Integrated count rates reach 45 MHz under the reported excitation conditions.
  • Average exciton fine-structure splitting falls to 1.3 micro-electronvolts, improving suitability for entangled photon pair generation.
  • Average coherence times remain 70 picoseconds, indicating the process does not degrade optical quality.
  • The architecture supports coupling efficiencies of 40 percent into a NA-0.6 lensed fiber without bottom reflectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same single-step suspension technique could be applied to other solid-state emitters to reduce fine-structure splitting without material-specific strain engineering.
  • Arrays of such free-standing devices might enable on-chip multi-photon sources once deterministic positioning is extended to larger areas.
  • The demonstrated fiber-coupling efficiency suggests these sources could be directly integrated into existing fiber-based quantum communication testbeds.

Load-bearing premise

The single-step aspect-ratio-dependent etching reliably produces the vertical asymmetry for directional emission, and the observed drop in fine-structure splitting is caused by strain relaxation in the suspended membrane rather than other fabrication side effects.

What would settle it

Fabricating and measuring identical GaAs quantum dots in both suspended CBGs and non-suspended planar reference regions; if the fine-structure splitting stays near 7 micro-electronvolts or the photoluminescence enhancement falls well below 100 times, the strain-relaxation and asymmetry claims would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02360 by Ahmad Rahimi, Caspar Hopfmann, Frank H. P. Fitzek, Liesa Raith, Martin Bauer, Moritz Langer, Riccardo Bassoli, Sai Abhishikth Dhurjati, Yared G. Zena.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic overview of the ultra-compact fiber-coupled photon source placed within a 4 K cryostat and the experimental characterization apparatus. The free-space collection objective features a numerical aperture of 0.55. A 635 nm continuous wave laser is used for excitation within the near-infrared (NIR) µ-photoluminescence (µPL) spectroscopy, while a halogen lamp is employed for broadband reflection spect… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simulated device performance of an optimized monolithic, free-standing CBG. The device parameters are listed in Section 3.2. The optimization figure of merit is EEfiber NA→0.6 . (a) Free-space extraction efficiency as a function of the collection numerical aperture (NA); the maximal obtained value at an NA of 0.6 is 0.55. Inset: Squared electrical field amplitude of the CBG far-field emission in polar repr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Structural and optical characterization of circular Bragg gratings (CBGs) with deterministically positioned quantum dots (QDs). (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a QD integrated within a CBG and positioned relative to AFM-defined oxide markers, whose corners define the alignment reference frame. The top inset shows a focused ion beam (FIB) cross-section of the trench profile, while the bottom… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated optical performance of the experimentally realized monolithic, free-standing CBG architecture. The device parameters reflect the post-fabrication measured dimensions (Section 3.2). (a) Free-space extraction efficiency as a function of the collection numerical aperture (NA). The efficiency within an NA of 0.6 is 0.43. Inset: Squared electrical field amplitude of the CBG far-field emission in polar… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a. For this specific device, the X emission line exhibits an intensity enhancement of roughly two to three orders of magnitude compared to typical QDs in unpatterned planar regions of the same sample. An overlaid Lorentzian cruve of the fundamental CBG cavity mode, extracted from the inverse reflectance spectrum, yields a cavity resonance energy of EC = 1.589 eV (λC = 780.3 nm) and a quality factor of Q = … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Statistical distribution of exciton fine structure splitting (FSS) for planar QDs and QDs embedded in CBGs. (b) Exemprlary Michelson interferometer coherence time T2 measurements and corresponding Laplacian visibility versus delay model curves of QD trion X+ emission lines of a QD embedded in a CBG and a planar QD. Beyond raw extraction efficiency, preserving the inherent optical qualities of the emitt… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Excitonic fine structure splitting (FSS) and distribution of linear Stokes parameter (S1 = IH−IV IH+IV ). (a) FSS of representative CBG modeled with sine function shown in the text giving a value of 1.8(1) µeV. (b) Distribution of S1 of the exciton emission line for QDs in CBGs and planar QDs. 7.2 Coherence Time Measurements Coherence measurements were performed using interferometric visibility analysis us… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Coherence measurements of QD in CBGs. (a)Distribution of measured coherence time of planar QDs and CBGs for of trion line. (b) Distribution of measured coherence time of planar QDs and CBGs for of exciton line. The measured coherence times yield average values of 56(20) ps for planar QDs and 70(25) ps for CBG-coupled QDs. The comparable coherence properties of both processed and unprocessed QDs indicates t… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Simulated device performance of an optimzed monolithic, free-standing CBG featuring a 150 nm thick membrane, the device parameters are listed in Section 3.2. The optimization figure of merit is EEfiber , details are given in the text. (a) Free-space extraction efficiency as a function of the emission angle in terms of the numerical aperture (NA), the maximal obtained value at an NA of 0.6 is 0.50. Inset: S… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Deterministic and bright quantum light sources based on scalable semiconductor technologies are a crucial building block for future quantum communication networks. While circular Bragg gratings (CBGs) are highly effective for extracting light from solid-state quantum emitters, conventional architectures rely on complex multi-layer processing or flip-chip bonding, which introduce detrimental strain and limit scalability. Here, we present a fabrication-minimal approach to realize monolithic, free-standing CBG cavities with deterministically positioned single GaAs quantum dots (QDs). By utilizing aspect-ratio-dependent etching (ARDE) in a single-step top-down process, we achieve the necessary vertical structural asymmetry for directional emission without requiring bottom reflectors. Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations validate this geometry, predicting free-space extraction efficiencies up to $68 \, \%$ and coupling efficiencies of $40 \, \%$ into a lensed single-mode fiber ($\text{NA} = 0.6$). Experimentally, the deterministically coupled QD-CBG devices yield a photoluminescence intensity enhancement of up to $\times 700$ compared to unprocessed planar QDs, reaching integrated count rates of $45 \, MHz$. Furthermore, the suspended membrane architecture effectively relaxes residual strain, significantly reducing the average exciton fine-structure splitting from $7.3 \, \mu eV$ in planar QDs to $1.3 \, \mu eV$ in the CBGs. Interferometric measurements confirm that the fabrication process preserves the optical quality of the emitters, with average coherence times of $70 \, ps$. By bridging optimized FDTD design with precise nanofabrication and robust optical performance, these results establish free-standing GaAs CBGs as a highly scalable platform for bright and coherent entangled photon pair sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a fabrication-minimal, single-step aspect-ratio-dependent etching (ARDE) process to realize monolithic free-standing circular Bragg grating (CBG) cavities with deterministically positioned GaAs quantum dots. FDTD simulations predict free-space extraction efficiencies up to 68% and 40% coupling into a NA=0.6 lensed fiber. Experiments report up to 700-fold photoluminescence intensity enhancement (45 MHz integrated count rates) relative to planar QDs, reduction of average exciton fine-structure splitting from 7.3 μeV to 1.3 μeV attributed to strain relaxation in the suspended membrane, and preserved optical quality with average coherence times of 70 ps.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a scalable route to bright, coherent GaAs QD-based entangled photon sources by eliminating multi-layer processing and flip-chip bonding while achieving both high extraction and reduced fine-structure splitting. The deterministic positioning, FDTD-validated geometry, and reported performance numbers represent clear strengths for quantum photonic integration.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results: The attribution of the exciton fine-structure splitting reduction (7.3 μeV planar to 1.3 μeV in CBGs) specifically to strain relaxation by the suspended membrane lacks direct supporting evidence. No strain metrology (Raman, XRD), pre/post-suspension measurements on the same QDs, or control samples (identical ARDE but substrate-supported) are described to rule out alternative mechanisms such as etching-induced QD selection or local environment modification.
  2. [Experimental section] Experimental section: The reported photoluminescence enhancement factor of ×700 and 45 MHz count rates are presented without error bars, number of devices measured, or statistical distributions, and without explicit comparison to identically processed but non-suspended controls. This weakens verification of the extraction efficiency claims and the causal role of the free-standing architecture.
minor comments (1)
  1. The coherence time of ~70 ps is stated as an average but the measurement technique (e.g., Michelson interferometer visibility decay) and fitting procedure are not detailed, reducing clarity on how optical quality is quantified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the work. We address each major point below and indicate the changes planned for the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results: The attribution of the exciton fine-structure splitting reduction (7.3 μeV planar to 1.3 μeV in CBGs) specifically to strain relaxation by the suspended membrane lacks direct supporting evidence. No strain metrology (Raman, XRD), pre/post-suspension measurements on the same QDs, or control samples (identical ARDE but substrate-supported) are described to rule out alternative mechanisms such as etching-induced QD selection or local environment modification.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not include direct strain metrology such as Raman or XRD data, nor pre/post-suspension measurements on identical QDs or substrate-supported ARDE controls. The attribution relies on the established mechanism of strain relaxation in suspended GaAs membranes reported in prior literature. In the revision we will expand the discussion to cite this literature, explicitly state the absence of direct metrology, and note that alternative mechanisms cannot be fully excluded. We will also add a sentence acknowledging this as a limitation of the present study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Experimental section] Experimental section: The reported photoluminescence enhancement factor of ×700 and 45 MHz count rates are presented without error bars, number of devices measured, or statistical distributions, and without explicit comparison to identically processed but non-suspended controls. This weakens verification of the extraction efficiency claims and the causal role of the free-standing architecture.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the current text lacks error bars, device counts, statistical distributions, and non-suspended control comparisons. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars, specify the number of devices measured, include statistical distributions of the enhancement factors, and provide data from identically processed but non-suspended control structures to better isolate the contribution of the free-standing geometry. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; simulations and experiments remain independent

full rationale

The paper reports FDTD simulations that predict extraction efficiencies from the described free-standing CBG geometry, followed by separate experimental results on fabricated devices showing PL enhancement and FSS reduction. No equations reduce to fitted parameters defined by the target quantities, no self-definitional loops exist, and no load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are invoked to justify the central claims. The FSS reduction is stated as an observed experimental outcome attributed to membrane suspension, without any derivation that collapses to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on established domain assumptions in nanofabrication and electromagnetic simulation; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Finite-difference time-domain simulations accurately predict extraction and coupling efficiencies for the described nanostructure geometry.
    Invoked to validate the free-standing CBG design and report 68% and 40% efficiencies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5651 in / 1369 out tokens · 79425 ms · 2026-05-08T19:15:13.930570+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Deterministic positioning of circular Bragg gratings using atomic force lithography for high-performance quantum dot light sources

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AFM nano-oxidation lithography positions GaAs quantum dots in free-standing circular Bragg gratings with 51 nm radial accuracy, delivering 245-fold photoluminescence enhancement and polarization stability below 5%.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability,

    J. Liu et al., “A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability,”Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 586– 593, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire,

    J. Claudon et al., “A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire,”Nature Photonics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 174–177, 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs,

    A. Dousse et al., “Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs,”Nature, vol. 466, no. 7303, pp. 217–220, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Maximally entangled and gigahertz-clocked on-demand photon pair source,

    C. Hopfmann, W. Nie, N. L. Sharma, C. Weigelt, F. Ding, and O. G. Schmidt, “Maximally entangled and gigahertz-clocked on-demand photon pair source,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, p. 075413, 7 Feb. 2021. 16

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    A stand-alone fiber-coupled single-photon source,

    A. Schlehahn et al., “A stand-alone fiber-coupled single-photon source,”Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1340, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Plug&play fiber-coupled 73 kHz single-photon source operating in the telecom o-band,

    A. Musiał et al., “Plug&play fiber-coupled 73 kHz single-photon source operating in the telecom o-band,”Advanced Quantum Technologies, vol. 3, no. 6, p. 2000018, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    An ultra-compact deterministic source of maximally entangled photon pairs,

    M. Langer et al., “An ultra-compact deterministic source of maximally entangled photon pairs,”APL Photonics, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 066117, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    A fiber-pigtailed quantum dot device generating indistinguishable photons at ghz clock-rates,

    L. Rickert et al., “A fiber-pigtailed quantum dot device generating indistinguishable photons at ghz clock-rates,”Nanophotonics, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Quantum dot single-photon emission coupled into single-mode fibers with 3D printed micro-objectives,

    L. Bremer et al., “Quantum dot single-photon emission coupled into single-mode fibers with 3D printed micro-objectives,”APL Photonics, vol. 5, no. 10, p. 106101, Oct. 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Y. G. Zena et al.,Compact system development of efficient quantum-entangled pho- ton sources towards deployable and industrial devices, 2026. arXiv:2604 . 02024 [quant-ph]

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric GaAs quantum dots,

    D. Huber et al., “Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric GaAs quantum dots,”Nat. Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Bright quantum dot light sources using monolithic microlenses on gold back-reflectors,

    M. Langer et al., “Bright quantum dot light sources using monolithic microlenses on gold back-reflectors,”Nanotechnology, vol. 36, no. 22, p. 225301, May 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    A bright and fast source of coherent single photons,

    N. Tomm et al., “A bright and fast source of coherent single photons,”Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 399–403, 2021

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and indistinguishability,

    H. Wang et al., “On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and indistinguishability,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, p. 113602, 11 Mar. 2019

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Strain-tunable single-photon source based on a circular bragg grating cavity with embedded quantum dots,

    M. Moczała-Dusanowska et al., “Strain-tunable single-photon source based on a circular bragg grating cavity with embedded quantum dots,”ACS Photonics, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3474–3480, Dec. 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    High-throughput quantum photonic devices emitting indistin- guishable photons in the telecom c-band,

    P. Holewa et al., “High-throughput quantum photonic devices emitting indistin- guishable photons in the telecom c-band,”Nat. Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 3358, Apr. 18, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Low-noise gaas quantum dots for quantum photonics,

    L. Zhai et al., “Low-noise gaas quantum dots for quantum photonics,”Nature Com- munications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 4745, 2020

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    On-demand source of maximally entangled photon pairs using the biexciton-exciton radiative cascade,

    R. Winik et al., “On-demand source of maximally entangled photon pairs using the biexciton-exciton radiative cascade,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 95, p. 235435, 23 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    A circular dielectric grating for vertical extraction of single quantum dot emission,

    M. Davanço, M. T. Rakher, D. Schuh, A. Badolato, and K. Srinivasan, “A circular dielectric grating for vertical extraction of single quantum dot emission,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 99, no. 4, p. 041102, Jul. 2011

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    High-performance designs for fiber-pigtailed quantum-light sources based on quantum dots in electrically- controlled circular bragg gratings,

    L. Rickert, F. Betz, M. Plock, S. Burger, and T. Heindel, “High-performance designs for fiber-pigtailed quantum-light sources based on quantum dots in electrically- controlled circular bragg gratings,”Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 14750–14770, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    S. A. Dhurjati et al.,Deterministic positioning of circular bragg gratings using atomic force lithography for high-performance quantum dot light sources, 2026. 17

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    Modified droplet epitaxy gaas/algaas quantum dots grown on a variable thickness wetting layer,

    S. Sanguinetti et al., “Modified droplet epitaxy gaas/algaas quantum dots grown on a variable thickness wetting layer,”Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 253, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2003

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    Faceting during gaas quantum dot self-assembly by droplet epitaxy,

    C. Heyn, A. Stemmann, A. Schramm, H. Welsch, W. Hansen, and Á. Nemcsics, “Faceting during gaas quantum dot self-assembly by droplet epitaxy,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 20, p. 203105, 2007

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    Solid-state ensemble of highly entangled photon sources at rubidium atomic transitions,

    R. Keil et al., “Solid-state ensemble of highly entangled photon sources at rubidium atomic transitions,”Nat. Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures,

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, “Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 87, pp. 347– 400, 2 2015

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Bright single- photon emission from a quantum dot in a circular bragg grating microcavity,

    S. Ates, L. Sapienza, M. Davanco, A. Badolato, and K. Srinivasan, “Bright single- photon emission from a quantum dot in a circular bragg grating microcavity,”IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1711–1721, 2012

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Strong-coupling regime for quan- tum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory,

    L. C. Andreani, G. Panzarini, and J.-M. Gérard, “Strong-coupling regime for quan- tum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 60, pp. 13276–13279, 19 1999

    work page 1999

  28. [28]

    Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state,

    N. Somaschi et al., “Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state,”Nature Photonics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 340–345, 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    High-performance single-photon sources at telecom wavelength based on broadband hybrid circular bragg gratings,

    A. Barbiero et al., “High-performance single-photon sources at telecom wavelength based on broadband hybrid circular bragg gratings,”ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 3060–3066, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Michler,Single Quantum Dots: Fundamentals, Applications and New Concepts (Topics in Applied Physics)

    P. Michler,Single Quantum Dots: Fundamentals, Applications and New Concepts (Topics in Applied Physics). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Statistical limits for entanglement swapping with semiconductor entangled photon sources,

    J. Yang et al., “Statistical limits for entanglement swapping with semiconductor entangled photon sources,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 105, p. 235305, 23 Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Langer et al.,Temperature-dependent refractive index of algaas for quantum- photonic devices near the bandgap, 2025

    M. Langer et al., “Temperature-dependent refractive index of algaas for quantum- photonic devices near the bandgap,” 2025. arXiv:2512.02212 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Experimental optimization of the fiber coupling efficiency of GaAs quantum dot-based photon sources,

    W. Nie et al., “Experimental optimization of the fiber coupling efficiency of GaAs quantum dot-based photon sources,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 119, no. 24, p. 244003, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    The influence of sample conductivity on local anodic ox- idation by the tip of atomic force microscope,

    V. Cambel and J. Šoltýs, “The influence of sample conductivity on local anodic ox- idation by the tip of atomic force microscope,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 102, no. 7, p. 074315, 2007

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Local anodic oxi- dationbyafmtipdevelopedfornovelsemiconductornanodevices,

    V. Cambel, J. Martaus, J. Šoltýs, R. Kúdela, and D. Gregušová, “Local anodic oxi- dationbyafmtipdevelopedfornovelsemiconductornanodevices,”Ultramicroscopy, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1021–1024, 2008

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Aspect ratio dependent etching lag reduction in deep silicon etch processes,

    S. L. Lai, D. Johnson, and R. Westerman, “Aspect ratio dependent etching lag reduction in deep silicon etch processes,”Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1283–1288, Jun. 2006

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Model for etch depth dependence on gaas via hole diameter,

    B. Abraham-Shrauner, K. J. Nordheden, and Y.-S. Lee, “Model for etch depth dependence on gaas via hole diameter,”Journal of Vacuum Science & Technol- ogy B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 961–964, May 1999. 18

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    Contact etch scaling with contact dimension,

    S. C. McNevin and M. Cerullo, “Contact etch scaling with contact dimension,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1514–1518, May 1998

    work page 1998

  39. [39]

    Heralded preparation of spin qubits in droplet-etched GaAs quantum dots using quasiresonant excitation,

    C. Hopfmann, N. L. Sharma, W. Nie, R. Keil, F. Ding, and O. G. Schmidt, “Heralded preparation of spin qubits in droplet-etched GaAs quantum dots using quasiresonant excitation,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 104, p. 075301, 7 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Quantum-confined stark effects in coupled inas/gaas quan- tum dots,

    S. Ramanathan et al., “Quantum-confined stark effects in coupled inas/gaas quan- tum dots,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, no. 21, p. 213101, May 2013

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Spectral control of deterministically fabricated quantum dot waveguide systems using the quantum confined stark effect,

    P. Schnauber et al., “Spectral control of deterministically fabricated quantum dot waveguide systems using the quantum confined stark effect,”APL Photonics, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 050801, May 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Exciton binding energies and diamagnetic shifts in semiconductor quantum wires and quantum dots,

    M. Bayer, S. N. Walck, T. L. Reinecke, and A. Forchel, “Exciton binding energies and diamagnetic shifts in semiconductor quantum wires and quantum dots,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 57, pp. 6584–6591, 11 Mar. 1998

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device,

    A. V. Kuhlmann et al., “Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device,”Nature Physics, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 570–575, 2013

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Deterministic quantum dot cavity placement using hyperspec- tral imaging with high spatial accuracy and precision,

    Q. Buchinger et al., “Deterministic quantum dot cavity placement using hyperspec- tral imaging with high spatial accuracy and precision,”Nano Convergence, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 36, 2025

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Kavokin, J

    A. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Malpuech, and F. P. Laussy,Microcavities. Oxford University Press, 2007. 19

    work page 2007