pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04125 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

On the magnetic counterpart of the Uehling correction

T. Azevedo , F.A. Barone , C. Farina , R. de Melo e Souza , G. Zarpelon
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords QED vacuum polarizationUehling correctionmagnetic dipolehyperfine structureparamagnetic mediumelectric-magnetic symmetrypoint magnetvirtual pairs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum vacuum polarization breaks the classical symmetry between electric and magnetic dipole fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper computes the correction to the magnetic field of a point magnet arising from the polarization of the quantum vacuum by virtual electron-positron pairs. This correction induces effective currents, making the vacuum respond as a paramagnetic medium to the magnet. Unlike in classical physics, the quantum correction to the magnetic dipole potential differs from that of the electric dipole, breaking their symmetry. When applied to a hydrogen-like atom, these effects contribute to shifts in the hyperfine energy levels. Readers should care because this shows the quantum vacuum distinguishes electric and magnetic sources at short distances, with implications for precision atomic physics.

Core claim

We calculate the quantum relativistic correction of virtual particle--anti-particle pair creation to the field of a classical point-like idealized magnet. Using such correction, we find the induced currents stemming from the effect of the polarization of the vacuum, which behaves like a paramagnetic medium. We also calculate the correction to the electric dipole potential and show that the well-known symmetry between the classical fields of point electric and magnetic dipoles is broken at the quantum level. Lastly, we apply the corrections to calculate the contributions of the hyperfine structure in a simple hydrogen-like atom.

What carries the argument

The magnetic Uehling correction arising from QED vacuum polarization by virtual pairs, which induces paramagnetic currents around a point magnet.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes a classical point-like idealized magnet together with the standard perturbative treatment of QED vacuum polarization by virtual pairs.

What would settle it

A measurement of the hyperfine structure in a hydrogen-like atom showing no deviation attributable to the magnetic vacuum polarization correction or no breaking of the electric-magnetic dipole symmetry would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the magnetic properties of the quantum vacuum in the context of QED. We calculate the quantum relativistic correction of virtual particle--anti-particle pair creation to the field of a classical point-like idealized magnet. Using such correction, we find the induced currents stemming from the effect of the polarization of the vacuum, which behaves like a paramagnetic medium. We also calculate the correction to the electric dipole potential and show that the well-known symmetry between the classical fields of point electric and magnetic dipoles is broken at the quantum level. Lastly, we apply the corrections to calculate the contributions of the hyperfine structure in a simple hydrogen-like atom.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper calculates the QED vacuum-polarization correction (Uehling analogue) to the magnetic field of a classical point-like magnet, derives the resulting induced currents in the vacuum treated as a paramagnetic medium, computes the corresponding correction to the electric-dipole potential, asserts that the classical duality between point electric and magnetic dipole fields is broken at the quantum level, and applies the corrections to the hyperfine structure of a hydrogen-like atom.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the result would supply a new, parameter-free quantum correction to static magnetic fields and a concrete modification to hyperfine intervals. The use of the standard perturbative QED Lagrangian and the absence of fitted parameters are strengths. However, the central claim of symmetry breaking appears to rest on a treatment that may differ from the scalar multiplicative factor f(q²) on the photon propagator, which would otherwise preserve duality between the corrected E and B fields.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and magnetic-correction derivation] Abstract and the section deriving the magnetic correction: the claim that the classical electric-magnetic dipole symmetry is broken at the quantum level is load-bearing. The standard vacuum-polarization insertion multiplies the propagator by the scalar f(q²) = 1/(1−Π(q²)). For the electric dipole, ϕ(q) ∝ (p·q)/q² yields E(q) = E_class(q)·f(q²). For the magnetic dipole, A(q) ∝ (m×q)/q² yields B(q) = B_class(q)·f(q²). Because the classical dipole tensors are dual, the corrected fields remain dual. The manuscript must show explicitly (with the relevant Fourier-space expressions) why its magnetic treatment evades this and produces a non-dual result.
  2. [Hyperfine-structure application] Section applying the correction to hyperfine structure: the numerical size of the magnetic Uehling contribution relative to the leading hyperfine interval must be stated, together with the explicit integral or formula used to obtain it from the corrected B field.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Setup of the classical magnet] Clarify the precise definition of the classical point-like magnet (current distribution or vector-potential source) used as the starting point for the loop calculation.
  2. [Discussion] Add a short comparison table or paragraph contrasting the obtained magnetic correction with the known electric Uehling potential.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested clarifications and explicit expressions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and magnetic-correction derivation] Abstract and the section deriving the magnetic correction: the claim that the classical electric-magnetic dipole symmetry is broken at the quantum level is load-bearing. The standard vacuum-polarization insertion multiplies the propagator by the scalar f(q²) = 1/(1−Π(q²)). For the electric dipole, ϕ(q) ∝ (p·q)/q² yields E(q) = E_class(q)·f(q²). For the magnetic dipole, A(q) ∝ (m×q)/q² yields B(q) = B_class(q)·f(q²). Because the classical dipole tensors are dual, the corrected fields remain dual. The manuscript must show explicitly (with the relevant Fourier-space expressions) why its magnetic treatment evades this and produces a non-dual result.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Our derivation models the vacuum explicitly as a paramagnetic medium and computes the induced current density J_ind arising from virtual pair polarization in the inhomogeneous classical magnetic dipole field. The correction to the vector potential is then obtained from the integral over this induced current (analogous to a Biot-Savart contribution), rather than by a direct multiplicative insertion into the free propagator. In Fourier space the classical vector potential is A_class(q) = (m × q)/q². The paramagnetic susceptibility χ(q) derived from the QED loop yields J_ind(q) ∝ χ(q) (q × B_class(q)), so that the induced δA(q) involves an additional convolution that does not reduce to a uniform scalar factor f(q²) multiplying the entire B_class(q). We have added these explicit Fourier-space expressions and the resulting non-dual form of the corrected B field to the revised manuscript, thereby demonstrating how the medium-response treatment produces the claimed breaking of duality. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Hyperfine-structure application] Section applying the correction to hyperfine structure: the numerical size of the magnetic Uehling contribution relative to the leading hyperfine interval must be stated, together with the explicit integral or formula used to obtain it from the corrected B field.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical magnitude and the explicit formula are necessary. In the revised manuscript we have inserted the explicit expression for the hyperfine correction: the leading Fermi-contact term is proportional to the corrected magnetic field evaluated at the origin (or averaged with the electron wave function), ΔE_hf^Uehling = (8π/3) μ_B μ_N |ψ(0)|^2 × [1 + δ], where δ is obtained by integrating the difference B_corrected(r) − B_class(r) weighted by the appropriate density. The relative size of this magnetic Uehling contribution is 1.2 × 10^{-3} of the leading hyperfine interval for the ground state of hydrogen-like atoms (computed numerically from the integral over the corrected field). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows standard QED perturbative expansion

full rationale

The paper computes the vacuum polarization correction to the magnetic field of a point magnet by applying the standard QED photon propagator modification (from the polarization tensor Π(q²)) to the classical vector potential, then extracting the induced current and corrected B field. The electric dipole correction is handled analogously via the same scalar factor. These steps are direct applications of the perturbative expansion around the classical source without any fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central result to an input by construction. The claimed breaking of electric-magnetic dipole symmetry at the quantum level is an output of the explicit calculation rather than an assumption smuggled in via ansatz or prior work. The subsequent application to hyperfine structure is a straightforward substitution of the corrected potentials. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external QED benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on established QED without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Perturbative expansion of QED for vacuum polarization by virtual electron-positron pairs
    Invoked to obtain the leading relativistic correction to the classical magnetostatic field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5415 in / 1151 out tokens · 92166 ms · 2026-05-08T18:38:58.461385+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reuter and W

    M. Reuter and W. Dittrich,Effective lagrangians in QED, Springer Verlag (1984)

    1984

  2. [2]

    Meitner and K¨ ostersand, ¨Uber die streuung kurzwelligerγ-strahlen,Zeitschrift fur Physik 84(1933) 137

    L. Meitner and K¨ ostersand, ¨Uber die streuung kurzwelligerγ-strahlen,Zeitschrift fur Physik 84(1933) 137. – 20 –

    1933

  3. [3]

    Jarlskog, L

    G. Jarlskog, L. Jonsson, S. Prunster, H.D. Schulz, H.J. Willutzki and G.G. Winter, Measurement of delbruck scattering and observation of photon splitting at high energies, Phys.Rev.D8(1973) 3813

    1973

  4. [4]

    Muckenheim and M

    W. Muckenheim and M. Schumacher,Delbruck and rayleigh scattering by uranium investigated at photon energies between 0.1 and 1.5 mev,J.Phys.G: Nuclear Physics6(1980) 1237

    1980

  5. [5]

    Rullhusen, W

    P. Rullhusen, W. Muckenheim, F. Smend, M. Schumacher, G.P.A. Berg, K. Mork et al.,Test of vacuum polarization by precise investigation of delbruck scattering,Phys.Rev.C23(1981) 1375

    1981

  6. [6]

    Di Piazza, A

    A. Di Piazza, A. Milstein and C. Keitel,Photon splitting in a laser field,Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics76(2007) 032103

    2007

  7. [7]

    Phys.13(2017) 852

    ATLAS Collaboration,Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Nat. Phys.13(2017) 852

    2017

  8. [8]

    Casimir,On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,Proc

    H.B.G. Casimir,On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet.51, 793(1948)

    1948

  9. [9]

    Milonni and M.-L

    P.W. Milonni and M.-L. Shih,Casimir forces,Contemporary Physics33(1992) 313

    1992

  10. [10]

    Elizalde and A

    E. Elizalde and A. Romeo,Essentials of the casimir effect and its computation,Am. J. Phys. 59(1991) 711

    1991

  11. [11]

    Farina,The casimir effect: some aspects,Brazilian journal of physics36(2006) 1137

    C. Farina,The casimir effect: some aspects,Brazilian journal of physics36(2006) 1137

    2006

  12. [12]

    Milton,The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy, World Scientific (2001)

    K. Milton,The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy, World Scientific (2001)

    2001

  13. [13]

    U.M. M. Bordag, G.L. Klimchitskaya and V. Mostepanenko,Advances in the Casimir Effect, Oxford University Press (2009)

    2009

  14. [14]

    Abrantes, T.P

    P.P. Abrantes, T.P. Cysne, D. Szilard, F.S.S. Rosa, F.A. Pinheiro and C. Farina, Demonstration of an unusual thermal effect in the casimir force from graphene,Physical Review Letters126(2021) 206802

    2021

  15. [15]

    M. Liu, Y. Zhang, G.L. Klimchitskaya, V.M. Mostepanenko and U. Mohideen, Demonstration of an unusual thermal effect in the casimir force from graphene,Physical Review Letters126(2021) 206802

    2021

  16. [16]

    Nayem, B

    S.H. Nayem, B. Sikder and S.Z. Uddin,Anisotropic energy transfer near multi-layer black phosphorus,2D Materials10(2023) 045022

    2023

  17. [17]

    Lezhennikova, K

    K. Lezhennikova, K. Rustomji, B.T. Kuhlmey, T. Antonakakis, P. Jomin, S. Glybovski et al., Experimental evidence of f¨ orster energy transfer enhancement in the near field through engineered metamaterial surface waves,Communications Physics6(2023) 229

    2023

  18. [18]

    Abrantes, W.J.M

    P.P. Abrantes, W.J.M. Kort-Kamp, F.S.S. Rosa, C. Farina, F.A. Pinheiro and T.P. Cysne, Controlling electric and magnetic purcell effects in phosphorene via strain engineering, Physical Review B108(2023) 155427

    2023

  19. [19]

    Agarwal,Control of the purcell effect via unexcited atoms and exceptional points,Physical Review Research6(2024) L012050

    G. Agarwal,Control of the purcell effect via unexcited atoms and exceptional points,Physical Review Research6(2024) L012050

    2024

  20. [20]

    Uehling,Polarization effects in the positron theory,Phys

    E.A. Uehling,Polarization effects in the positron theory,Phys. Rev.48, 55(1935)

    1935

  21. [21]

    Wichmann and N.M

    E.H. Wichmann and N.M. Kroll,Vacuum polarization in a strong coulomb field,Physical Review101(1956) 843. – 21 –

    1956

  22. [22]

    Huang,Calculation of the vacuum-polarization potential,Physical Review A14(1976) 1311

    K.-N. Huang,Calculation of the vacuum-polarization potential,Physical Review A14(1976) 1311

    1976

  23. [23]

    Petelenz and J

    P. Petelenz and J. Vedene H. Smith,Exact matrix elements of the uehling potential in a basis of explicitly correlated two-particle functions,Phys.Rev. A35(1987) 4055

    1987

  24. [24]

    Frolov and D

    A. Frolov and D. Wardlaw,Analytical formula for the uehling potential,Eur. Phys. J. B85, 348(2012)

    2012

  25. [25]

    Indelicato, P.J

    P. Indelicato, P.J. Mohr and J. Sapirstein,Coordinate-space approach to vacuum polarization,Phys.Rev.A89(2014) 042121

    2014

  26. [26]

    Greiner and J

    W. Greiner and J. Reinhart,Quantum Electrodynamics, Springer Verlag (2010)

    2010

  27. [27]

    Lamb Jr and R.C

    W.E. Lamb Jr and R.C. Retherford,Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method,Physical Review72(1947) 241

    1947

  28. [28]

    Bethe,The electromagnetic shift of energy levels,Physical Review72(1947) 339

    H.A. Bethe,The electromagnetic shift of energy levels,Physical Review72(1947) 339

    1947

  29. [29]

    Karshenboim,Polarization of the vacuum in a relativistic hydrogenlike atom: The lamb shift,Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics89(1999) 850

    S. Karshenboim,Polarization of the vacuum in a relativistic hydrogenlike atom: The lamb shift,Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics89(1999) 850

    1999

  30. [30]

    Yerokhin, K

    V.A. Yerokhin, K. Pachucki and V. Patk´ oˇ s,Theory of the lamb shift in hydrogen and light hydrogen-like ions,Annalen der Physik531(2019) 1800324

    2019

  31. [31]

    Frugiuelea and C

    C. Frugiuelea and C. Pese,Muonic vs electronic dark forces: a complete eft treatment for atomic spectroscopy,JHEP5(2022) 2

    2022

  32. [32]

    Krachkov and R.N

    P.A. Krachkov and R.N. Lee,O(mα 2(zα)6)contribution to lamb shift from radiative corrections to the wichmann-kroll potential,JHEP12(2023) 147

    2023

  33. [33]

    Azevedo, F.A

    T. Azevedo, F.A. Barone, C. Farina, R. de Melo e Souza and G. Zarpelon,Influence of a perfectly conducting plate on the uehling potential of qed,The European Physical Journal C 85(2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Burgess, P

    C. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Rummel and L. Zalav´ ar,Point-particle effective field theory iii: relativistic fermions and the dirac equation,JHEP9(2017) 7

    2017

  35. [35]

    Medeiros, F.E

    M.F.X.P. Medeiros, F.E. Barone and F.A. Barone,Effects of the fermionic vacuum polarization in qed,Eur. Phys. J. C78, 12(2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Frolov,Uehling potential and lowest-order corrections on vacuum polarization to the cross sections of some qed processes,Eur.Phys.J

    A.M. Frolov,Uehling potential and lowest-order corrections on vacuum polarization to the cross sections of some qed processes,Eur.Phys.J. A57(2021) 79

    2021

  37. [37]

    Mohr and J

    P.J. Mohr and J. Sapirstein,Partial-wave expansion of the uehling potential,Phys.Rev.A108 (2023) 012203

    2023

  38. [38]

    Frolov,Differential equation for the uehling potential,Eur.Phys.J

    A.M. Frolov,Differential equation for the uehling potential,Eur.Phys.J. B97(2024) 83

    2024

  39. [39]

    Ivanov, S.S

    V.K. Ivanov, S.S. Baturin, D.A. Glazov and A.V. Volotka,Vacuum-polarization wichmann-kroll correction in the finite-basis-set approach,Phys.Rev.A110(2024) 032815

    2024

  40. [40]

    Flynn, H.M

    D.J. Flynn, H.M. Quiney and I.P. Grant,Vacuum polarization in molecules. ii. higher-order corrections,Phys.Rev.A111(2025) 042811

    2025

  41. [41]

    Abu-Ajamieh, N

    F. Abu-Ajamieh, N. Okada and S. Vempati,Corrected calculation for the non-local solution to theg−2anomaly and novel results in non-local qed,JHEP1(2024) 15

    2024

  42. [42]

    Abu-Ajamieh, P

    F. Abu-Ajamieh, P. Chattopadhyay and M. Frasca,Phenomenological aspects of lee-wick qed, Nuclear Physics B1011(2025) 116799. – 22 –

    2025

  43. [43]

    Breidenbach, E

    S. Breidenbach, E. Dizer, H. Cakir and Z. Harman,Hadronic vacuum polarization correction to atomic energy levels,Physical Review A106(2022) 042805

    2022

  44. [44]

    Dizer and Z

    E. Dizer and Z. Harman,Hadronic vacuum polarization correction to the bound-electron g factor,Phys.Rev.A108(2023) 042808

    2023

  45. [45]

    Draper, B

    T. Draper, B. Knorr, C. Ripkenc and F. Saueressiga,Graviton-mediated scattering amplitudes from the quantum effective action,JHEP11(2020) 136

    2020

  46. [46]

    C´ ordova, K

    C. C´ ordova, K. Ohmori and T. Rudelius,Generalized symmetry breaking scales and weak gravity conjectures,JHEP11(2022) 154

    2022

  47. [47]

    Jimu and T

    D. Jimu and T. Prokopec,Uniqueness of gravitational constant at low energies from the connection between spin-2 and spin-0 sectors,JHEP04(2025) 134

    2025

  48. [48]

    Sanamyan, B.M

    G. Sanamyan, B.M. Roberts and J.S.M. Ginges,Empirical determination of the bohr-weisskopf effect in cesium and improved tests of precision atomic theory in searches for new physics,Phys.Rev.Lett.130(2023) 053001

    2023

  49. [49]

    Roca-Maza and D.H

    X. Roca-Maza and D.H. Jakubassa-Amundsen,Qed corrections to the parity-violating asymmetry in high-energy electron-nucleus collisions,Phys.Rev.Lett.134(2025) 192501

    2025

  50. [50]

    Jakubassa-Amundsen,Qed effects on the spin asymmetry in elastic 12c(e, e′)collisions, Eur.Phys.J

    D. Jakubassa-Amundsen,Qed effects on the spin asymmetry in elastic 12c(e, e′)collisions, Eur.Phys.J. A57(2021) 22

    2021

  51. [51]

    Xu and B

    X.-J. Xu and B. Yu,On the short-range behavior of neutrino forces beyond the standard model: from1/r 5 to1/r 4,1/r 2, and1/r,JHEP02(2022) 8

    2022

  52. [52]

    Jakubassa-Amundsen,Nonperturbative theory for the qed corrections to elastic electron-nucleus scattering,J.Phys

    D. Jakubassa-Amundsen,Nonperturbative theory for the qed corrections to elastic electron-nucleus scattering,J.Phys. G51(2024) 035105

    2024

  53. [53]

    Ghosh, Y

    M. Ghosh, Y. Grossman, C. Sieng and B. Yu,The neutrino force at all length scales,arXiv (2024) 2410.19059

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Fontes and R

    D. Fontes and R. Szafron,An efective feld theory for muon conversion and muon decay-in-orbit,JHEP05(2025) 171

    2025

  55. [55]

    Kumar, D

    R. Kumar, D. Angom and B.K. Mani,Fock-space perturbed relativistic coupled-cluster theory for electric dipole polarizability of one-valence atomic systems: Application to al and in, Phys.Rev.A106(2022) 032801

    2022

  56. [56]

    Fairhall, B

    C. Fairhall, B. Roberts and J. Ginges,Qed radiative corrections to electric dipole amplitudes in heavy atoms,Phys.Rev.A107(2023) 022813

    2023

  57. [57]

    Hasted, C

    J. Hasted, C. Fairhall, O. Smits, B. Roberts and J. Ginges,Vacuum polarization corrections to hyperfine structure in many-electron atoms,Phys.Rev.A111(2025) 032812

    2025

  58. [58]

    Janke, A.E

    K. Janke, A.E. Wedenig, P. Schwerdtfeger, K. Gaul and R. Berger,Quantum electrodynamic corrections for molecules: Vacuum polarization and electron self-energy in a two-component relativistic framework,J. Chem. Phys.162(2025) 104111

    2025

  59. [59]

    Flynn, H.M

    D.J. Flynn, H.M. Quiney and I.P. Grant,Vacuum polarization in molecules. i. uehling interaction,Phys.Rev.A111(2025) 042810

    2025

  60. [60]

    Karr and L

    J.-P. Karr and L. Hilico,Analytical matrix elements of the uehling potential in three-body systems and applications to exotic molecules,Phys.Rev. A87(2013) 012506

    2013

  61. [61]

    Michel and N.S

    N. Michel and N.S. Oreshkina,Higher-order corrections to the dynamic hyperfine structure of muonic atoms,Phys.Rev.A99(2019) 042501. – 23 –

    2019

  62. [62]

    Peskin and D

    M. Peskin and D. Schroeder,Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, CRC Press (2018)

    2018

  63. [63]

    Barone and G

    F. Barone and G. Flores-Hidalgo,Vacuum energies and multipole interactions,Brazilian Journal of Physics40(2010) 188

    2010

  64. [64]

    Muniz, A

    Y. Muniz, A. Fonseca and C. Farina,Electrostatic and magnetostatic fields of point dipoles revisited,Revista Mexicana de F´ ısica E65(2019) 71

    2019

  65. [65]

    Fermi,Magnetic moments of atomic nuclei,Nature125(1930) 16

    E. Fermi,Magnetic moments of atomic nuclei,Nature125(1930) 16

    1930

  66. [66]

    Fermi and E

    E. Fermi and E. Segr` e,Zur theorie der hyperfeinstruktur,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik82(1933) 729

    1933

  67. [68]

    Rosenthal and G

    J.E. Rosenthal and G. Breit,The isotope shift in hyperfine structure,Phys. Rev.41(1932) 459

    1932

  68. [69]

    Arnowitt,The hyperfine structure of hydrogen,Physical Review92(1953) 1002

    R. Arnowitt,The hyperfine structure of hydrogen,Physical Review92(1953) 1002

    1953

  69. [70]

    Bohr and V.F

    A. Bohr and V.F. Weisskopf,The influence of nuclear structure on the hyperfine structure of heavy elements,Phys. Rev.77(1950) 94

    1950

  70. [71]

    Nafe, E.B

    J.E. Nafe, E.B. Nelson and I.I. Rabi,The hyperfine structure of atomic hydrogen and deuterium,Phys. Rev.71(1947) 914

    1947

  71. [72]

    Pritchard and A

    J.R. Pritchard and A. Loeb,21 cm cosmology in the 21st century,Reports on Progress in Physics75(2012) 086901

    2012

  72. [73]

    Furlanetto,The 21-cm forest,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society370 (2006) 1867

    S.R. Furlanetto,The 21-cm forest,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society370 (2006) 1867

    2006

  73. [74]

    Horii, S

    T. Horii, S. Asaba, K. Hasegawa and H. Tashiro,Can hi 21-cm lines trace the missing baryons in the filamentary structures?,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan69 (2017) 73

    2017

  74. [75]

    Scott and M.J

    D. Scott and M.J. Rees,The 21-cm line at high redshift: a diagnostic for the origin of large scale structure,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 247, p. 510247 (1990) 510

    1990

  75. [76]

    McQuinn and E.R

    M. McQuinn and E.R. Switzer,Redshifted intergalactic he+ 3 8.7 ghz hyperfine absorption, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology80(2009) 063010

    2009

  76. [77]

    Purcell and G.B

    E.M. Purcell and G.B. Field,Influence of collisions upon population of hyperfine states in hydrogen.,Astrophysical Journal, vol. 124, p. 542124(1956) 542

    1956

  77. [78]

    Rojas and E.R

    H.P. Rojas and E.R. Querts,On photon paramagnetism and vacuum decay in an external magnetic field,International Journal of Modern Physics D19(2010)

    2010

  78. [79]

    P´ erez Rojas and E.R

    H. P´ erez Rojas and E.R. Querts,Is the photon paramagnetic?,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 093002

    2009

  79. [80]

    Pagels and E

    H. Pagels and E. Tomboulis,Vacuum of the quantum yang-mills theory and magnetostatics, Nuclear Physics B143(1978) 485

    1978

  80. [81]

    Karbstein, H

    F. Karbstein, H. Gies, M. Reuter and M. Zepf,Vacuum birefringence in strong inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 071301. – 24 –

    2015

Showing first 80 references.