pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05721 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Electronic and Photonic Integration of Single Quantum Emitters in 2D Materials

Sahil D. Patel , Sean Doan , Luka Jevremovic , Kamyar Parto , Galan Moody This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords single quantum emitters2D materialselectronic integrationphotonic integrationsingle-photon sourcestransition metal dichalcogenideshexagonal boron nitridequantum photonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Practical single-photon sources from 2D emitters require co-designed electronic and photonic architectures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Single quantum emitters in two-dimensional materials promise bright, pure photons for quantum technologies but still depend on bulky optics and suffer from instability. This review surveys electronic controls such as electrical injection, fast modulation, electrostatic stabilization, and Stark tuning to suppress blinking and noise, alongside photonic structures like waveguides and resonators that direct emission and boost rates via the Purcell effect. The authors connect these methods to source performance metrics and conclude that scalable, turnkey operation demands unified designs that optimize triggering, stability, tunability, and fiber-compatible interfacing together.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the next stage of progress in quantum photonics with 2D emitters depends on co-designed electronic and photonic architectures that jointly optimize on-demand operation, stabilization, tunability, and packaging-compatible optical interfacing.

What carries the argument

Co-designed electronic-photonic architectures, combining electrical injection and gating for control with waveguide or resonator coupling for light collection.

If this is right

  • Electrical injection enables on-demand single-photon emission without optical pumping or post-selection.
  • Electrostatic stabilization and Stark tuning reduce spectral wandering and charge noise to improve linewidth and stability.
  • Waveguide and resonator integration increases brightness and directs photons into defined modes for circuit compatibility.
  • Combined integration directly improves single-photon purity, brightness, and indistinguishability metrics.
  • These strategies address the limitations of current bulky excitation methods for scalable quantum information processing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hybrid devices could enable on-chip quantum networks where 2D emitters interface directly with electronic logic and photonic circuits.
  • The integration approach might generalize to other solid-state emitters if fabrication compatibility improves.
  • Room-temperature operation could become feasible if stabilization techniques reduce environmental sensitivity enough.
  • Packaging for fiber coupling would allow these sources to move from lab demonstrations to deployed quantum systems.

Load-bearing premise

The separately demonstrated electronic and photonic techniques can be combined in one device without major incompatibilities in fabrication, noise, or efficiency.

What would settle it

A working device that simultaneously achieves electrical on-demand triggering, electrostatic noise suppression, and high-efficiency waveguide coupling with measured high purity and brightness would support the claim; repeated failure to integrate all functions without performance loss would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05721 by Galan Moody, Kamyar Parto, Luka Jevremovic, Sahil D. Patel, Sean Doan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: is a natural synthesis of this logic into two ar￾chitectures that could plausibly become workhorse build￾ing blocks for scalable 2D quantum photonics. In Fig. 11a, an hBN-encapsulated TMD SQE stack is paired with back gates that electrostatically dope and stabilize the local environment and top gates/contacts that deliver view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single-photon sources that are bright, pure, and interference-ready are essential for quantum communication and photonic quantum information processing, but many solid-state platforms still rely on bulky optical excitation, careful alignment, and post-selection to achieve useful linewidth, stability, and brightness. Scalable quantum photonics instead requires turnkey quantum-light engines that can be triggered on demand, stabilized against environmental noise, and efficiently interfaced with fibers or photonic circuits. This review surveys recent progress in electronic and photonic integration of single quantum emitters in two-dimensional materials, focusing on localized excitonic emitters in transition metal dichalcogenides and defect-based color centers in hexagonal boron nitride. On the electronic side, we discuss electrical injection, fast modulation, electrostatic stabilization, and Stark tunability as routes to suppress blinking, spectral wandering, and charge-noise-induced broadening. On the photonic side, we review waveguide and resonator platforms that funnel emission into well-defined optical modes and, in some cases, enhance radiative rates through the Purcell effect. We connect these integration strategies to key source metrics, including single-photon purity, brightness, spectral stability, and photon indistinguishability. We conclude that the next stage of progress will depend on co-designed electronic and photonic architectures that jointly optimize on-demand operation, stabilization, tunability, and packaging-compatible optical interfacing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review surveying recent progress on electronic integration (electrical injection, fast modulation, electrostatic stabilization, and Stark tunability) and photonic integration (waveguide and resonator coupling, including possible Purcell enhancement) of single quantum emitters in 2D materials, focusing on localized excitons in transition-metal dichalcogenides and defect centers in hexagonal boron nitride. It connects these approaches to source metrics such as single-photon purity, brightness, spectral stability, and indistinguishability, and concludes that future advances require co-designed electronic-photonic architectures that jointly optimize on-demand operation, stabilization, tunability, and packaging-compatible interfacing.

Significance. If the synthesis is accurate, the review offers a clear roadmap for the field by identifying the integration of electronic control with photonic interfacing as the central remaining challenge for practical, scalable quantum light sources based on 2D emitters. The compilation of separate advances in each domain and the explicit linkage to performance metrics provide a useful perspective that could help prioritize experimental efforts toward co-optimized devices.

major comments (1)
  1. [Conclusion] Conclusion: The forward-looking claim that 'the next stage of progress will depend on co-designed electronic and photonic architectures' is load-bearing for the paper's central thesis yet does not explicitly discuss potential incompatibilities (e.g., differing fabrication temperatures, dielectric environments, or charge-noise sources) between the electronic and photonic integration methods surveyed earlier; addressing this would strengthen the recommendation.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the temporal scope of the literature surveyed (e.g., 'advances reported since 2018') to help readers gauge completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Conclusion] Conclusion: The forward-looking claim that 'the next stage of progress will depend on co-designed electronic and photonic architectures' is load-bearing for the paper's central thesis yet does not explicitly discuss potential incompatibilities (e.g., differing fabrication temperatures, dielectric environments, or charge-noise sources) between the electronic and photonic integration methods surveyed earlier; addressing this would strengthen the recommendation.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly discussing potential incompatibilities would strengthen the conclusion. The manuscript surveys electronic and photonic integration approaches separately and connects them to source metrics, but does not address practical co-integration challenges. In the revised manuscript we will add a concise paragraph to the Conclusion section that outlines key incompatibilities, including differing fabrication temperature budgets (e.g., high-temperature steps for certain photonic structures versus the thermal sensitivity of 2D materials), the influence of dielectric environments on charge noise, and additional noise sources introduced by electrodes or substrates. This addition will qualify the central thesis without changing its direction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in literature survey

full rationale

The paper is a descriptive literature review surveying experimental progress on electronic injection, modulation, Stark tuning, and photonic waveguide/resonator coupling for quantum emitters in 2D materials. It contains no mathematical derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions. The concluding synthesis—that co-designed architectures are needed—is presented as a forward-looking perspective based on cited external demonstrations, not as a result derived from the paper's own inputs or self-citations. No load-bearing claims reduce by construction to definitions, fits, or author-overlapping uniqueness theorems; all referenced advances are treated as independent prior work. The structure is self-contained as a survey with no internal derivation chain to inspect.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced because no new theoretical framework or model is derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5544 in / 1015 out tokens · 23850 ms · 2026-05-08T11:39:17.491159+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Bringing 2D-material quantum emitters into on-chip resonators requires solving two practical problems at once: placing the SQE where the cavity field is strongest, and ensuring the SQE can be tuned into spectral reso- nance without compromising single-photon performance. A clear example of how these challenges can be addre...

  2. [2]

    Hexagonal Boron Nitride Hexagonal boron nitride offers a particularly flexible route to on-chip resonant enhancement because emitters can be hosted in thin, transferable flakes while the pho- tonic circuitry is defined lithographically in a separate layer. In practice, the dominant integration challenge is not simply bringing the materials into contact, b...

    2020

  3. [3]

    Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Off-chip resonators provide an attractive integration route for 2D quantum emitters because they enhance the light-matter interaction while directing the emitted pho- tons vertically out of the chip into highly directional, fiber-compatible free-space modes. This geometry can deliver strong Purcell enhancement while largel...

    2021

  4. [4]

    tune the cavity to the emitter

    Hexagonal Boron Nitride In hBN, off-chip resonator integration has converged on a few complementary alignment strategies that trade mechanical tunability for deterministic fabrica- tion, but all aim to convert intrinsically bright (yet spa- tially/spectrally variable) defect emission into a well- defined optical mode suitable for efficient free-space col-...

  5. [5]

    Position-controlled quantum emit- ters with reproducible emission wavelength in hexago- nal boron nitride.Nature communications, 12(1):3779, 2021

    Clarisse Fournier, Alexandre Plaud, S´ ebastien Roux, Aur´ elie Pierret, Michael Rosticher, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, St´ ephanie Buil, Xavier Qu´ elin, Julien Barjon, et al. Position-controlled quantum emit- ters with reproducible emission wavelength in hexago- nal boron nitride.Nature communications, 12(1):3779, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    Nanoindentation for tailored single-photon emitters in hbn: Influence of annealing on defect stabil- ity.ACS nano, 19(41):36302–36312, 2025

    Safa L Ahmed, Lukas Harsch, Csongor Imre, Ioan- nis Karapatzakis, Luis Kussi, Jeremias Resch, Marcel Schrodin, Ines H¨ ausler, Tolga Wagner, Christoph T Koch, et al. Nanoindentation for tailored single-photon emitters in hbn: Influence of annealing on defect stabil- ity.ACS nano, 19(41):36302–36312, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    High-Performance Near-Infrared Quantum Emission from Color Centers in hBN

    Sean Doan, Sahil D Patel, Yilin Chen, Jordan A Gus- dorff Turiansky, E Mark, Luis Villagomez, Luka Jevremovic, Nicholas Lewis, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, et al. Near-infrared quantum emission from oxygen-related defects in hbn.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16197, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Schaibley, Yu He, Ming-Cheng Chen, Yu-Jia Wei, Xing Ding, Qiang Zhang, Wang Yao, Xiaodong Xu, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan

    Yu-Ming He, Genevieve Clark, John R. Schaibley, Yu He, Ming-Cheng Chen, Yu-Jia Wei, Xing Ding, Qiang Zhang, Wang Yao, Xiaodong Xu, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors.Nature Nanotechnology, 10(6):497–502, 2015

    2015

  9. [9]

    Allain, Do- minik S

    Ajit Srivastava, Meinrad Sidler, Adrien V. Allain, Do- minik S. Lembke, Andras Kis, and Atac Imamoglu. Op- tically active quantum dots in monolayer wse2.Nature Nanotechnology, 10(6):491–496, 2015

    2015

  10. [10]

    Koperski, K

    M. Koperski, K. Nogajewski, A. Arora, V. Cherkez, P. Mallet, J.-Y. Veuillen, J. Marcus, P. Kossacki, and M. Potemski. Single photon emitters in exfoliated wse2 structures.Nature Nanotechnology, 10(6):503–506, 2015

    2015

  11. [11]

    Steele, An- dres Castellanos-Gomez, Herre S

    Philipp Tonndorf, Robert Schmidt, Robert Schneider, Johannes Kern, Michele Buscema, Gary A. Steele, An- dres Castellanos-Gomez, Herre S. J. van der Zant, Stef- fen Michaelis de Vasconcellos, and Rudolf Bratschitsch. Single-photon emission from localized excitons in an atomically thin semiconductor.Optica, 2(4):347–352, 2015

    2015

  12. [12]

    Deterministic strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters in a two-dimensional semiconduc- tor.Nature communications, 8(1):15053, 2017

    Artur Branny, Santosh Kumar, Rapha¨ el Proux, and Brian D Gerardot. Deterministic strain-induced arrays of quantum emitters in a two-dimensional semiconduc- tor.Nature communications, 8(1):15053, 2017

    2017

  13. [13]

    Kara, Ale- jandro R.-P

    Carmen Palacios-Berraquero, Dhiren M. Kara, Ale- jandro R.-P. Montblanch, Matteo Barbone, Pawel Latawiec, Duhee Yoon, Anna K. Ott, Marko Loncar, Andrea C. Ferrari, and Mete Atature. Large-scale quantum-emitter arrays in atomically thin semiconduc- tors.Nature Communications, 8:15093, 2017

    2017

  14. [14]

    Reiter, Tilmann Kuhn, and Rudolf Bratschitsch

    Johannes Kern, Iris Niehues, Philipp Tonndorf, Robert Schmidt, Daniel Wigger, Robert Schneider, Torsten Stiehm, Steffen Michaelis de Vasconcellos, Doris E. Reiter, Tilmann Kuhn, and Rudolf Bratschitsch. Nanoscale positioning of single-photon emitters in atomically thin wse2.Advanced Materials, 28(33):7101– 7105, 2016

    2016

  15. [15]

    Defect and strain engineer- ing of monolayer wse2 enables site-controlled single- photon emission up to 150 k.Nature communications, 12(1):3585, 2021

    Kamyar Parto, Shaimaa I Azzam, Kaustav Baner- jee, and Galan Moody. Defect and strain engineer- ing of monolayer wse2 enables site-controlled single- photon emission up to 150 k.Nature communications, 12(1):3585, 2021

    2021

  16. [16]

    Shepard, Obafunso A

    Gabriella D. Shepard, Obafunso A. Ajayi, Xiangzhi Li, X.-Y. Zhu, James Hone, and Stefan Strauf. Nanobubble induced formation of quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors.2D Materials, 4(2):021019, 2017

    2017

  17. [17]

    Darlington, Christian Carmesin, Matthias Florian, Emanuil Yanev, Obafunso Ajayi, Jenny Arde- lean, Daniel A

    Thomas P. Darlington, Christian Carmesin, Matthias Florian, Emanuil Yanev, Obafunso Ajayi, Jenny Arde- lean, Daniel A. Rhodes, Augusto Ghiotto, Andrey Krayev, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jeffrey W. Kysar, Abhay N. Pasupathy, James C. Hone, Frank Jahnke, Nicholas J. Borys, and P. James Schuck. Imag- ing strain-localized excitons in nanoscale bubbles...

    2020

  18. [18]

    Electrically driven strain-induced deterministic single-photon emitters in a van der waals heterostruc- ture.Science Advances, 7(43):eabj3176, 2021

    Jae-Pil So, Ha-Reem Kim, Hyeonjun Baek, Kwang- Yong Jeong, Hoo-Cheol Lee, Woong Huh, Yoon Seok Kim, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jungkil Kim, et al. Electrically driven strain-induced deterministic single-photon emitters in a van der waals heterostruc- ture.Science Advances, 7(43):eabj3176, 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Single defect light-emitting diode in a van der waals heterostructure

    Genevieve Clark, John R Schaibley, Jason Ross, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Joshua R Hendrickson, Shin Mou, Wang Yao, and Xiaodong Xu. Single defect light-emitting diode in a van der waals heterostructure. Nano letters, 16(6):3944–3948, 2016

    2016

  20. [20]

    Tunable emission from localized excitons deterministically positioned in monolayer p–n junctions.ACS Photonics, 9(9):3067–3074, 2022

    Erik J Lenferink, Trevor LaMountain, Teodor K Stanev, Ethan Garvey, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Nathaniel P Stern. Tunable emission from localized excitons deterministically positioned in monolayer p–n junctions.ACS Photonics, 9(9):3067–3074, 2022

    2022

  21. [21]

    Electroluminescence from pure resonant states in hbn-based vertical tunneling junc- tions.Light: Science & Applications, 13(1):155, 2024

    Magdalena Grzeszczyk, Kristina Vaklinova, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Konstantin S Novoselov, and Maciej Koperski. Electroluminescence from pure resonant states in hbn-based vertical tunneling junc- tions.Light: Science & Applications, 13(1):155, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Solid-state single-photon emitters.Nature photonics, 10(10):631–641, 2016

    Igor Aharonovich, Dirk Englund, and Milos Toth. Solid-state single-photon emitters.Nature photonics, 10(10):631–641, 2016

    2016

  23. [23]

    Photonic quantum technologies.Nature pho- tonics, 3(12):687–695, 2009

    Jeremy L O’brien, Akira Furusawa, and Jelena Vuˇ ckovi´ c. Photonic quantum technologies.Nature pho- tonics, 3(12):687–695, 2009

    2009

  24. [24]

    Quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride

    Igor Aharonovich, Jean-Philippe Tetienne, and Milos Toth. Quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Letters, 22(23):9227–9235, 2022

    2022

  25. [25]

    Robust solid-state quantum system op- erating at 800 k.Acs Photonics, 4(4):768–773, 2017

    Mehran Kianinia, Blake Regan, Sherif Abdulkader Taw- fik, Toan Trong Tran, Michael J Ford, Igor Aharonovich, and Milos Toth. Robust solid-state quantum system op- erating at 800 k.Acs Photonics, 4(4):768–773, 2017

    2017

  26. [26]

    Hexagonal boron nitride is an indirect bandgap semi- conductor.Nature photonics, 10(4):262–266, 2016

    Guillaume Cassabois, Pierre Valvin, and Bernard Gil. Hexagonal boron nitride is an indirect bandgap semi- conductor.Nature photonics, 10(4):262–266, 2016

    2016

  27. [27]

    Photonics with hexagonal boron nitride.Na- ture Reviews Materials, 4(8):552–567, 2019

    Joshua D Caldwell, Igor Aharonovich, Guillaume Cass- abois, James H Edgar, Bernard Gil, and Dimitri N Basov. Photonics with hexagonal boron nitride.Na- ture Reviews Materials, 4(8):552–567, 2019

    2019

  28. [28]

    Site-specific fabrication of blue quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride.Acs Photonics, 9(6):2170– 2177, 2022

    Angus Gale, Chi Li, Yongliang Chen, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Igor Aharonovich, and Milos Toth. Site-specific fabrication of blue quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride.Acs Photonics, 9(6):2170– 2177, 2022. 26

    2022

  29. [29]

    Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature

    Andreas Gottscholl, Mehran Kianinia, Victor Soltamov, Sergei Orlinskii, Georgy Mamin, Carlo Bradac, Chris- tian Kasper, Klaus Krambrock, Andreas Sperlich, Milos Toth, et al. Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature. Nature materials, 19(5):540–545, 2020

    2020

  30. [30]

    Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers.Nature nanotech- nology, 11(1):37–41, 2016

    Toan Trong Tran, Kerem Bray, Michael J Ford, Milos Toth, and Igor Aharonovich. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers.Nature nanotech- nology, 11(1):37–41, 2016

    2016

  31. [31]

    Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride.ACS nano, 10(8):7331–7338, 2016

    Toan Trong Tran, Christopher Elbadawi, Daniel Toton- jian, Charlene J Lobo, Gabriele Grosso, Hyowon Moon, Dirk R Englund, Michael J Ford, Igor Aharonovich, and Milos Toth. Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride.ACS nano, 10(8):7331–7338, 2016

    2016

  32. [32]

    Temperature dependence of wavelength se- lectable zero-phonon emission from single defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano letters, 16(10):6052– 6057, 2016

    Nicholas R Jungwirth, Brian Calderon, Yanxin Ji, Michael G Spencer, Michael E Flatt´ e, and Gregory D Fuchs. Temperature dependence of wavelength se- lectable zero-phonon emission from single defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano letters, 16(10):6052– 6057, 2016

    2016

  33. [33]

    Tunable and high-purity room tem- perature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications, 8(1):1–8, 2017

    Gabriele Grosso, Hyowon Moon, Benjamin Lienhard, Sajid Ali, Dmitri K Efetov, Marco M Furchi, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, Michael J Ford, Igor Aharonovich, and Dirk Englund. Tunable and high-purity room tem- perature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications, 8(1):1–8, 2017

    2017

  34. [34]

    Deterministic cou- pling of site-controlled quantum emitters in monolayer wse2 to plasmonic nanocavities.Nature nanotechnology, 13(12):1137–1142, 2018

    Yue Luo, Gabriella D Shepard, Jenny V Ardelean, Daniel A Rhodes, Bumho Kim, Katayun Barmak, James C Hone, and Stefan Strauf. Deterministic cou- pling of site-controlled quantum emitters in monolayer wse2 to plasmonic nanocavities.Nature nanotechnology, 13(12):1137–1142, 2018

    2018

  35. [35]

    Site-controlled telecom-wavelength single- photon emitters in atomically-thin mote2.Nature com- munications, 12(1):6753, 2021

    Huan Zhao, Michael T Pettes, Yu Zheng, and Han Htoon. Site-controlled telecom-wavelength single- photon emitters in atomically-thin mote2.Nature com- munications, 12(1):6753, 2021

    2021

  36. [36]

    Large- scale, high-yield laser fabrication of bright and pure single-photon emitters at room temperature in hexago- nal boron nitride.ACS nano, 16(9):14254–14261, 2022

    Lin Gan, Danyang Zhang, Ruiling Zhang, Qiyao Zhang, Hao Sun, Yongzhuo Li, and Cun-Zheng Ning. Large- scale, high-yield laser fabrication of bright and pure single-photon emitters at room temperature in hexago- nal boron nitride.ACS nano, 16(9):14254–14261, 2022

    2022

  37. [37]

    Scalable and deterministic fabrication of quantum emit- ter arrays from hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Letters, 21(8):3626–3632, 2021

    Chi Li, Noah Mendelson, Ritika Ritika, YongLiang Chen, Zai-Quan Xu, Milos Toth, and Igor Aharonovich. Scalable and deterministic fabrication of quantum emit- ter arrays from hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Letters, 21(8):3626–3632, 2021

    2021

  38. [38]

    Creating quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride deterministically on chip-compatible sub- strates.Nano letters, 21(19):8182–8189, 2021

    Xiaohui Xu, Zachariah O Martin, Demid Sychev, Alexei S Lagutchev, Yong P Chen, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Vladimir M Shalaev, and Alexandra Boltasseva. Creating quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride deterministically on chip-compatible sub- strates.Nano letters, 21(19):8182–8189, 2021

    2021

  39. [39]

    Transfer of hexago- nal boron nitride quantum emitters onto arbitrary sub- strates with zero thermal budget.APL Materials, 12(7), 2024

    Dante J O’Hara, Hsun-Jen Chuang, Kathleen M Mc- Creary, Mehmet A Noyan, Sung-Joon Lee, Enrique D Cobas, and Berend T Jonker. Transfer of hexago- nal boron nitride quantum emitters onto arbitrary sub- strates with zero thermal budget.APL Materials, 12(7), 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    Coupling hexagonal boron nitride quantum emitters to photonic crystal cavities.ACS nano, 14(6):7085–7091, 2020

    Johannes E Fr¨ och, Sejeong Kim, Noah Mendelson, Mehran Kianinia, Milos Toth, and Igor Aharonovich. Coupling hexagonal boron nitride quantum emitters to photonic crystal cavities.ACS nano, 14(6):7085–7091, 2020

    2020

  41. [41]

    Integration of hbn quantum emitters in monolithically fabricated waveguides.ACS photonics, 8(10):2966– 2972, 2021

    Chi Li, Johannes E Froch, Milad Nonahal, Thinh N Tran, Milos Toth, Sejeong Kim, and Igor Aharonovich. Integration of hbn quantum emitters in monolithically fabricated waveguides.ACS photonics, 8(10):2966– 2972, 2021

    2021

  42. [42]

    Cavity-enhanced 2d material quantum emitters deterministically inte- grated with silicon nitride microresonators.Nano Let- ters, 22(23):9748–9756, 2022

    Kamyar Parto, Shaimaa I Azzam, Nicholas Lewis, Sahil D Patel, Sammy Umezawa, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Galan Moody. Cavity-enhanced 2d material quantum emitters deterministically inte- grated with silicon nitride microresonators.Nano Let- ters, 22(23):9748–9756, 2022

    2022

  43. [43]

    Surface acous- tic wave cavity optomechanics with atomically thin h- bn and wse 2 single-photon emitters.PRX Quantum, 5(1):010330, 2024

    Sahil D Patel, Kamyar Parto, Michael Choquer, Nicholas Lewis, Sammy Umezawa, Landon Hellman, Daniella Polishchuk, and Galan Moody. Surface acous- tic wave cavity optomechanics with atomically thin h- bn and wse 2 single-photon emitters.PRX Quantum, 5(1):010330, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Purcell- induced bright single photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Letters, 24(40):12390–12397, 2024

    Mashnoon Alam Sakib, Brandon Triplett, William Har- ris, Naveed Hussain, Alexander Senichev, Melika Mo- menzadeh, Joshua Bocanegra, Polina Vabishchevich, Ruqian Wu, Alexandra Boltasseva, et al. Purcell- induced bright single photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Letters, 24(40):12390–12397, 2024

    2024

  45. [45]

    Yamashita, M

    Daiki Yamashita, Masaki Yumoto, Aiko Narazaki, and Makoto Okano. Deterministic integration of hbn single- photon emitters on sin waveguides via femtosecond laser processing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19477, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Photonic crystal cavities from hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications, 9(1):2623, 2018

    Sejeong Kim, Johannes E Fr¨ och, Joe Christian, Mar- cus Straw, James Bishop, Daniel Totonjian, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Milos Toth, and Igor Aharonovich. Photonic crystal cavities from hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications, 9(1):2623, 2018

    2018

  47. [47]

    Room-temperature optically de- tected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications, 13(1):618, 2022

    Hannah L Stern, Qiushi Gu, John Jarman, Simone Eizagirre Barker, Noah Mendelson, Dipankar Chugh, Sam Schott, Hoe H Tan, Henning Sirringhaus, Igor Aharonovich, et al. Room-temperature optically de- tected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature communications, 13(1):618, 2022

    2022

  48. [48]

    Room temperature dynamics of an optically addressable single spin in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano letters, 24(25):7623–7628, 2024

    Raj N Patel, Rebecca EK Fishman, Tzu-Yung Huang, Jordan A Gusdorff, David A Fehr, David A Hopper, S Alex Breitweiser, Benjamin Porat, Michael E Flatt´ e, and Lee C Bassett. Room temperature dynamics of an optically addressable single spin in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano letters, 24(25):7623–7628, 2024

    2024

  49. [49]

    Single-spin reso- nance in a van der waals embedded paramagnetic defect

    Nathan Chejanovsky, Amlan Mukherjee, Jianpei Geng, Yu-Chen Chen, Youngwook Kim, Andrej Denisenko, Amit Finkler, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Durga Bhaktavatsala Rao Dasari, et al. Single-spin reso- nance in a van der waals embedded paramagnetic defect. Nature materials, 20(8):1079–1084, 2021

    2021

  50. [50]

    Nuclear spin polarization and control in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature Materials, 21(9):1024– 1028, 2022

    Xingyu Gao, Sumukh Vaidya, Kejun Li, Peng Ju, Boyang Jiang, Zhujing Xu, Andres E Llacsahuanga All- cca, Kunhong Shen, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watan- abe, et al. Nuclear spin polarization and control in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature Materials, 21(9):1024– 1028, 2022

    2022

  51. [51]

    High-contrast plasmonic-enhanced shallow spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quan- tum sensing.Nano Letters, 21(18):7708–7714, 2021

    Xingyu Gao, Boyang Jiang, Andres E Llacsahuanga All- cca, Kunhong Shen, Mohammad A Sadi, Abhishek B Solanki, Peng Ju, Zhujing Xu, Pramey Upadhyaya, Yong P Chen, et al. High-contrast plasmonic-enhanced shallow spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quan- tum sensing.Nano Letters, 21(18):7708–7714, 2021. 27

    2021

  52. [52]

    Gilardoni, Qiushi Gu, Si- mone Eizagirre Barker, Oliver FJ Powell, Xiaoxi Deng, Stephanie A Fraser, Louis Follet, Chi Li, Andrew J Ramsay, et al

    Hannah L Stern, Carmem M. Gilardoni, Qiushi Gu, Si- mone Eizagirre Barker, Oliver FJ Powell, Xiaoxi Deng, Stephanie A Fraser, Louis Follet, Chi Li, Andrew J Ramsay, et al. A quantum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions.Nature Materials, 23(10):1379–1385, 2024

    2024

  53. [53]

    Two-photon in- terference from a quantum emitter in hexagonal boron nitride.Physical Review Applied, 19(4):L041003, 2023

    Clarisse Fournier, S´ ebastien Roux, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, St´ ephanie Buil, Julien Barjon, Jean- Pierre Hermier, and Aymeric Delteil. Two-photon in- terference from a quantum emitter in hexagonal boron nitride.Physical Review Applied, 19(4):L041003, 2023

    2023

  54. [54]

    Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Science Advances, 7(14):eabf3630, 2021

    Andreas Gottscholl, Matthias Diez, Victor Soltamov, Christian Kasper, Andreas Sperlich, Mehran Kian- inia, Carlo Bradac, Igor Aharonovich, and Vladimir Dyakonov. Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Science Advances, 7(14):eabf3630, 2021

    2021

  55. [55]

    Excited state spectroscopy of boron vacancy defects in hexago- nal boron nitride using time-resolved optically detected magnetic resonance.Nano Letters, 22(1):461–467, 2021

    Simon Baber, Ralph Nicholas Edward Malein, Prince Khatri, Paul Steven Keatley, Shi Guo, Freddie With- ers, Andrew J Ramsay, and Isaac J Luxmoore. Excited state spectroscopy of boron vacancy defects in hexago- nal boron nitride using time-resolved optically detected magnetic resonance.Nano Letters, 22(1):461–467, 2021

    2021

  56. [56]

    Negatively charged boron-vacancy defect in hexagonal boron ni- tride nanoparticles.Applied Physics Letters, 124(17), 2024

    Yahya A Alzahrani and Masfer Alkahtani. Negatively charged boron-vacancy defect in hexagonal boron ni- tride nanoparticles.Applied Physics Letters, 124(17), 2024

    2024

  57. [57]

    Detection of paramagnetic spins with an ultrathin van der waals quantum sensor

    Islay O Robertson, Sam C Scholten, Priya Singh, Alexander J Healey, Fernando Meneses, Philipp Rei- neck, Hiroshi Abe, Takeshi Ohshima, Mehran Kian- inia, Igor Aharonovich, et al. Detection of paramagnetic spins with an ultrathin van der waals quantum sensor. ACS nano, 17(14):13408–13417, 2023

    2023

  58. [58]

    Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature Communications, 14(1):3299, 2023

    Ruotian Gong, Guanghui He, Xingyu Gao, Peng Ju, Zhongyuan Liu, Bingtian Ye, Erik A Henriksen, Tong- cang Li, and Chong Zu. Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride.Nature Communications, 14(1):3299, 2023

    2023

  59. [59]

    Atomically-thin quantum light emitting diodes

    Carmen Palacios-Berraquero. Atomically-thin quantum light emitting diodes. InQuantum confined excitons in 2-dimensional materials, pages 71–89. Springer, 2018

    2018

  60. [60]

    Electri- cally pumped single-defect light emitters in wse2.2D Materials, 3(2):025038, 2016

    S Schwarz, Aleksey Kozikov, Freddie Withers, JK Maguire, AP Foster, S Dufferwiel, Lee Hague, MN Makhonin, LR Wilson, AK Geim, et al. Electri- cally pumped single-defect light emitters in wse2.2D Materials, 3(2):025038, 2016

    2016

  61. [61]

    Narrowband electroluminescence from color centers in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Letters, 24(48):15268–15274, 2024

    Gyuna Park, Ivan Zhigulin, Hoyoung Jung, Jake Horder, Karin Yamamura, Yerin Han, Hyunje Cho, Hyeon-Woo Jeong, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, et al. Narrowband electroluminescence from color centers in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Letters, 24(48):15268–15274, 2024

    2024

  62. [62]

    Low-background single-photon emission and multiwavelength electrolu- minescence from carbon-doped hexagonal boron nitride

    Xiaoran Wang, Jialong Li, Ruxin Liu, Shuo Zhang, Yun Yao, Siyuan Wang, Xiangyi Wang, Yaning Liang, Xiao Wang, Xuechao Yu, et al. Low-background single-photon emission and multiwavelength electrolu- minescence from carbon-doped hexagonal boron nitride. Chemistry of Materials, 37(22):9048–9056, 2025

    2025

  63. [63]

    Electrical generation of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 17(16):24129–24136, 2025

    Ivan Zhigulin, Gyuna Park, Karin Yamamura, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Milos Toth, Jonghwan Kim, and Igor Aharonovich. Electrical generation of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 17(16):24129–24136, 2025

    2025

  64. [64]

    Electrically driven photon emission from in- dividual atomic defects in monolayer ws2.Science ad- vances, 6(38):eabb5988, 2020

    Bruno Schuler, Katherine A Cochrane, Christoph Kastl, Edward S Barnard, Edward Wong, Nicholas J Borys, Adam M Schwartzberg, D Frank Ogletree, F Javier Garc´ ıa de Abajo, and Alexander Weber- Bargioni. Electrically driven photon emission from in- dividual atomic defects in monolayer ws2.Science ad- vances, 6(38):eabb5988, 2020

    2020

  65. [65]

    Electrically driven site-controlled single photon source

    Shi Guo, Savvas Germanis, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Freddie Withers, and Isaac J Luxmoore. Electrically driven site-controlled single photon source. ACS photonics, 10(8):2549–2555, 2023

    2023

  66. [66]

    James Howarth, Kristina Vaklinova, Magdalena Grzeszczyk, Giulio Baldi, Lee Hague, Marek Potem- ski, Kostya S Novoselov, Aleksey Kozikov, and Maciej Koperski. Electroluminescent vertical tunneling junc- tions based on wse2 monolayer quantum emitter ar- rays: Exploring tunability with electric and magnetic fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Scien...

    2024

  67. [67]

    Electrically pumped h-bn single-photon emission in van der waals heterostructure

    Mihyang Yu, Jeonghan Lee, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Jieun Lee. Electrically pumped h-bn single-photon emission in van der waals heterostructure. ACS nano, 19(1):504–511, 2024

    2024

  68. [68]

    Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, NJ, 2007

    Kwok Kwok Ng and Simon M Sze.Physics of semicon- ductor devices. Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, NJ, 2007

    2007

  69. [69]

    Contact engineering for 2d materials and devices

    Daniel S Schulman, Andrew J Arnold, and Saptarshi Das. Contact engineering for 2d materials and devices. Chemical Society Reviews, 47(9):3037–3058, 2018

    2018

  70. [70]

    Understanding contact gat- ing in schottky barrier transistors from 2d channels.Sci- entific reports, 7(1):12596, 2017

    Abhijith Prakash, Hesameddin Ilatikhameneh, Peng Wu, and Joerg Appenzeller. Understanding contact gat- ing in schottky barrier transistors from 2d channels.Sci- entific reports, 7(1):12596, 2017

    2017

  71. [71]

    Ul- trafast dynamics of defect-assisted electron–hole recom- bination in monolayer mos2.Nano letters, 15(1):339– 345, 2015

    Haining Wang, Changjian Zhang, and Farhan Rana. Ul- trafast dynamics of defect-assisted electron–hole recom- bination in monolayer mos2.Nano letters, 15(1):339– 345, 2015

    2015

  72. [72]

    Defects as a factor limiting carrier mobility in wse2: A spectroscopic investigation.Nano Research, 9(12):3622–3631, 2016

    Zhangting Wu, Zhongzhong Luo, Yuting Shen, Weiwei Zhao, Wenhui Wang, Haiyan Nan, Xitao Guo, Litao Sun, Xinran Wang, Yumeng You, et al. Defects as a factor limiting carrier mobility in wse2: A spectroscopic investigation.Nano Research, 9(12):3622–3631, 2016

    2016

  73. [73]

    Transferred via contacts as a plat- form for ideal two-dimensional transistors.Nature Elec- tronics, 2(5):187–194, 2019

    Younghun Jung, Min Sup Choi, Ankur Nipane, Ab- hinandan Borah, Bumho Kim, Amirali Zangiabadi, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Won Jong Yoo, James Hone, et al. Transferred via contacts as a plat- form for ideal two-dimensional transistors.Nature Elec- tronics, 2(5):187–194, 2019

    2019

  74. [74]

    Improved contacts to mos2 transistors by ultra-high vacuum metal deposition

    Chris D English, Gautam Shine, Vincent E Dorgan, Kr- ishna C Saraswat, and Eric Pop. Improved contacts to mos2 transistors by ultra-high vacuum metal deposition. Nano letters, 16(6):3824–3830, 2016

    2016

  75. [75]

    Van der waals contacts between three-dimensional metals and two-dimensional semiconductors.Nature, 568(7750):70–74, 2019

    Yan Wang, Jong Chan Kim, Ryan J Wu, Jenny Mar- tinez, Xiuju Song, Jieun Yang, Fang Zhao, Andre Mkhoyan, Hu Young Jeong, and Manish Chhowalla. Van der waals contacts between three-dimensional metals and two-dimensional semiconductors.Nature, 568(7750):70–74, 2019

    2019

  76. [76]

    Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors.Nature, 593(7858):211–217, 2021

    Pin-Chun Shen, Cong Su, Yuxuan Lin, Ang-Sheng Chou, Chao-Ching Cheng, Ji-Hoon Park, Ming-Hui Chiu, Ang-Yu Lu, Hao-Ling Tang, Mohammad Mahdi Tavakoli, et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors.Nature, 593(7858):211–217, 2021. 28

    2021

  77. [77]

    Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts.Na- ture, 613(7943):274–279, 2023

    Weisheng Li, Xiaoshu Gong, Zhihao Yu, Liang Ma, Wenjie Sun, Si Gao, C ¸ a˘ gıl K¨ oro˘ glu, Wenfeng Wang, Lei Liu, Taotao Li, et al. Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts.Na- ture, 613(7943):274–279, 2023

    2023

  78. [78]

    Two-dimensional mos2-enabled flexible rectenna for wi-fi-band wireless energy harvesting.Nature, 566(7744):368–372, 2019

    Xu Zhang, Jes´ us Grajal, Jose Luis Vazquez-Roy, Ujwal Radhakrishna, Xiaoxue Wang, Winston Chern, Lin Zhou, Yuxuan Lin, Pin-Chun Shen, Xiang Ji, et al. Two-dimensional mos2-enabled flexible rectenna for wi-fi-band wireless energy harvesting.Nature, 566(7744):368–372, 2019

    2019

  79. [79]

    Ultrafast 27 ghz cutoff frequency in ver- tical wse2 schottky diodes with extremely low contact resistance.Nature communications, 11(1):1574, 2020

    Sung Jin Yang, Kyu-Tae Park, Jaeho Im, Sungjae Hong, Yangjin Lee, Byung-Wook Min, Kwanpyo Kim, and Seongil Im. Ultrafast 27 ghz cutoff frequency in ver- tical wse2 schottky diodes with extremely low contact resistance.Nature communications, 11(1):1574, 2020

    2020

  80. [80]

    Lifetime-limited and tunable quantum light emission in h-bn via electric field modulation.Nano Letters, 22(19):7798–7803, 2022

    Hamidreza Akbari, Souvik Biswas, Pankaj Kumar Jha, Joeson Wong, Benjamin Vest, and Harry A Atwater. Lifetime-limited and tunable quantum light emission in h-bn via electric field modulation.Nano Letters, 22(19):7798–7803, 2022

    2022

Showing first 80 references.