arxiv: 2605.10269 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.RO

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Increasing the Efficiency of DETR for Maritime High-Resolution Images

Tinsae Yehuala , Hao Cheng , Ville Lehtola

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 05:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.RO

keywords maritime object detectionvision mambaDETRhigh-resolution imagestoken pruningfeature pyramid networkstate space modelsunmanned surface vessels

0 comments

The pith

Vision Mamba backbones with token pruning let DETR process high-resolution maritime images more efficiently than ResNet-based alternatives.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper adapts DETR detectors for maritime scenes by swapping in Vision Mamba backbones that rely on state space models. These models capture long-range context across high-resolution images while keeping computation linear in the number of tokens instead of quadratic. A custom feature pyramid network adds successive downsampling and extra SSM layers, and token pruning removes background tokens to cut unnecessary work. If the method holds, unmanned surface vessels can run real-time detection on full-resolution camera feeds without the accuracy penalties that come from downsampling or image splitting. The reported outcome is a stronger performance-to-compute ratio than RT-DETR using a ResNet50 backbone on the same maritime tasks.

Core claim

Vision Mamba backbones, paired with a tailored Feature Pyramid Network that incorporates successive downsampling and additional SSM layers plus selective token pruning, allow DETR-style detectors to handle high-resolution maritime imagery with linear scaling in sequence length while preserving accuracy on small and distant objects such as buoys and vessels.

What carries the argument

Vision Mamba (ViM) backbones that tokenize images into sequences processed by state space models, combined with a custom Feature Pyramid Network using successive downsampling and SSM layers and token pruning on background regions.

If this is right

High-resolution inputs can be fed directly to the detector without the accuracy loss typical of downsampling or patch splitting.
Real-time inference becomes practical on edge hardware for unmanned surface vessels.
Small distant objects remain detectable at competitive accuracy levels.
Overall compute scales linearly with image size rather than with fixed high costs or quadratic attention.
The performance-efficiency trade-off improves over RT-DETR with ResNet50 on maritime benchmarks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same backbone and pruning strategy could transfer to other high-resolution detection settings where small objects must be found in large scenes.
Dynamic token pruning guided by scene statistics might yield further savings beyond the static approach described.
Combining the method with newer DETR variants could extend the efficiency gains to additional detector families.

Load-bearing premise

The Vision Mamba backbone plus the added pyramid network and pruning step will keep detection accuracy high on small and distant maritime objects even as compute drops.

What would settle it

On a standard maritime detection test set the model shows clearly lower precision on small objects or no reduction in memory or latency relative to RT-DETR at the same input resolutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10269 by Hao Cheng, Tinsae Yehuala, Ville Lehtola.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Background-Aware Linear-Scaling Backbone. The flattened image is first passed through a shallow pre-backbone [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Tokenization. The input image is divided into patches, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Visualization of maritime object detection. Left: Ground truth. Right: Prediction with the proposed method using a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Maritime object detection is critical for the safe navigation of unmanned surface vessels (USVs), requiring accurate recognition of obstacles from small buoys to large vessels. Real-time detection is challenging due to long distances, small object sizes, large-scale variations, edge computing limitations, and the high memory demands of high-resolution imagery. Existing solutions, such as downsampling or image splitting, often reduce accuracy or require additional processing, while memory-efficient models typically handle only limited resolutions. To overcome these limitations, we leverage Vision Mamba (ViM) backbones, which build on State Space Models (SSMs) to capture long-range dependencies while scaling linearly with sequence length. Images are tokenized into sequences for efficient high-resolution processing. For further computational efficiency, we design a tailored Feature Pyramid Network with successive downsampling and SSM layers, as well as token pruning to reduce unnecessary computation on background regions. Compared to state-of-the-art methods like RT-DETR with ResNet50 backbone, our approach achieves a better balance between performance and computational efficiency in maritime object detection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper adapts Vision Mamba with a custom FPN and background token pruning to DETR for high-res maritime detection, but the abstract gives no metrics or pruning details to support the efficiency claims.

read the letter

The main contribution is a domain-specific setup that replaces the usual DETR backbone with Vision Mamba, adds successive downsampling in the FPN along with extra SSM layers, and prunes tokens labeled as background. This targets the memory and compute problems that come with feeding high-resolution images to detection models on unmanned surface vessels, where you need to spot everything from distant buoys to nearby ships without quadratic attention costs. The choice of SSMs for linear scaling with sequence length is a reasonable fit for the long-range dependencies in open water scenes, and the pruning step directly attacks the fact that most pixels are empty sea or sky. That part of the architecture sketch is clear and addresses a real constraint in maritime robotics. The paper also does a straightforward job stating why simple downsampling or image splitting hurts small-object accuracy. The soft spot is the total lack of evidence. The abstract claims a better performance-efficiency trade-off than RT-DETR with a ResNet50 backbone, yet it contains no mAP scores, no FPS or memory figures, no dataset references, and no ablation on the pruning or FPN changes. Without those, the central claim stays untested. The pruning mechanism itself is described only as targeting background regions, with no mention of how tokens are scored or what threshold is used. In maritime images small or low-contrast objects can easily be mistaken for clutter, so aggressive pruning could drop recall on the hardest cases before the SSM layers ever see them. This is a practical engineering paper for readers already working on efficient detectors for edge maritime perception or similar high-resolution constrained settings. Someone looking for concrete ideas on combining Mamba with DETR-style heads might find the block diagram useful, but the work is too preliminary to cite or extend until experiments appear. I would send it to peer review if the full manuscript includes reproducible results and a clear pruning rule that preserves small-object performance; otherwise it needs more substance before taking referee time.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes enhancing DETR efficiency for high-resolution maritime object detection by replacing standard backbones with Vision Mamba (ViM) models based on State Space Models (SSMs) for linear-complexity long-range modeling, adding a tailored Feature Pyramid Network that incorporates successive downsampling and SSM layers, and applying token pruning focused on background regions. It claims this yields a superior performance-computational efficiency trade-off relative to RT-DETR with ResNet50, addressing challenges of small/distant objects, scale variation, and edge-device memory limits in USV navigation.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work could meaningfully advance real-time maritime perception by exploiting SSM linear scaling to process high-resolution inputs without the accuracy penalties of downsampling or the quadratic costs of transformers, offering a practical path for accurate small-object detection under edge-computing constraints. The tailored FPN and pruning strategy directly target maritime-specific issues of clutter and extreme scale variation.

major comments (3)

Abstract: the central claim of a 'better balance between performance and computational efficiency' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, ablation studies, dataset descriptions, or error analysis, rendering the improvement over RT-DETR unverifiable from the provided text.
Token pruning section (as described in the abstract): the mechanism for targeting 'background regions' is unspecified (no attention scoring, learned mask, or threshold is given), creating a load-bearing risk that sparse tokens from small buoys or distant vessels amid sea clutter will be discarded, directly undermining the weakest assumption that accuracy on small/distant maritime objects will be preserved.
Vision Mamba + tailored FPN integration: no details are supplied on how the SSM layers within the FPN interact with the DETR decoder or how token sequences from high-resolution inputs are managed, leaving the claimed linear scaling and accuracy retention ungrounded.

minor comments (1)

The abstract would benefit from explicit mention of the evaluation datasets (e.g., maritime-specific benchmarks) and backbone variants tested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the central claim of a 'better balance between performance and computational efficiency' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, ablation studies, dataset descriptions, or error analysis, rendering the improvement over RT-DETR unverifiable from the provided text.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a concise summary, does not include the supporting quantitative metrics. The full manuscript contains experimental results comparing our method to RT-DETR on the maritime dataset, including mAP, inference speed, and computational costs. We will revise the abstract to incorporate key quantitative results that directly support the performance-efficiency claim, along with a brief reference to the dataset and evaluation protocol. revision: yes
Referee: Token pruning section (as described in the abstract): the mechanism for targeting 'background regions' is unspecified (no attention scoring, learned mask, or threshold is given), creating a load-bearing risk that sparse tokens from small buoys or distant vessels amid sea clutter will be discarded, directly undermining the weakest assumption that accuracy on small/distant maritime objects will be preserved.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the token pruning mechanism lacks sufficient detail in the current text. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly describe the pruning approach, including the scoring method for identifying background regions, the threshold or mask used, and supporting analysis or ablations demonstrating that small and distant objects are not discarded. This will directly address the concern about preserving accuracy on sparse maritime targets. revision: yes
Referee: Vision Mamba + tailored FPN integration: no details are supplied on how the SSM layers within the FPN interact with the DETR decoder or how token sequences from high-resolution inputs are managed, leaving the claimed linear scaling and accuracy retention ungrounded.

Authors: We acknowledge that the integration details between the tailored FPN's SSM layers and the DETR decoder, as well as the handling of high-resolution token sequences, require expansion. We will revise the relevant sections to provide a clear description of the data flow, how SSM outputs are prepared for the decoder, and the sequence management strategy that enables linear scaling while maintaining detection accuracy for maritime objects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical proposal resting on external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper proposes an architectural combination (Vision Mamba backbone + tailored FPN + token pruning) for high-resolution maritime detection and supports its claims solely through empirical comparisons to external baselines such as RT-DETR with ResNet50. No equations, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or self-cited ansatzes appear in the provided text. The central efficiency/accuracy balance is presented as an experimental outcome rather than a quantity derived from the method's own definitions or prior self-citations. This is the most common honest finding for method papers whose value is measured against independent test sets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1074 out tokens · 68877 ms · 2026-05-12T05:27:27.933351+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

leverage Vision Mamba (ViM) backbones... token pruning to reduce unnecessary computation on background regions... tailored Feature Pyramid Network with successive downsampling and SSM layers

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation,

R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, “Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2014, pp. 580–587

work page 2014
[2]

Faster r-cnn: Towards real- time object detection with region proposal networks,

S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, “Faster r-cnn: Towards real- time object detection with region proposal networks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 28, 2015

work page 2015
[3]

Mask r-cnn,

K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Doll ´ar, and R. Girshick, “Mask r-cnn,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017, pp. 2961–2969

work page 2017
[4]

An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale,

A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, “An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger,

J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, “Yolo9000: better, faster, stronger,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 7263–7271

work page 2017
[6]

Detrs beat yolos on real-time object detection,

Y . Zhao, W. Lv, S. Xu, J. Wei, G. Wang, Q. Dang, Y . Liu, and J. Chen, “Detrs beat yolos on real-time object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024, pp. 16 965–16 974

work page 2024
[7]

Sensors and ai techniques for situational awareness in autonomous ships: A review,

S. Thombre, Z. Zhao, H. Ramm-Schmidt, J. M. Vallet Garcia, T. Malkamaki, S. Nikolskiy, T. Hammarberg, H. Nuortie, M. Z. H. Bhuiyan, S. Sarkka, and V . V . Lehtola, “Sensors and ai techniques for situational awareness in autonomous ships: A review,”IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 64–83, 2020

work page 2020
[8]

On the effect of image resolution on semantic segmentation,

R. Singh, A. Jain, P. Perona, S. Agarwal, and J. Yang, “On the effect of image resolution on semantic segmentation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05398, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[9]

Megade- tectnet: a fast object detection framework for ultra-high-resolution images,

J. Wang, Y . Zhang, F. Zhang, Y . Li, L. Nie, and J. Zhao, “Megade- tectnet: a fast object detection framework for ultra-high-resolution images,”Electronics, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 3737, 2023

work page 2023
[10]

Vision mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model,

L. Zhu, B. Liao, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Liu, and X. Wang, “Vision mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

work page 2024
[11]

Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,

A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,” inFirst Conference on Language Modeling, 2024

work page 2024
[12]

Transformers are ssms: Generalized models and efficient algorithms through structured state space duality,

T. Dao and A. Gu, “Transformers are ssms: Generalized models and efficient algorithms through structured state space duality,” inForty- first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

work page 2024
[13]

Vssd: Vision mamba with non- causal state space duality,

Y . Shi, M. Dong, M. Li, and C. Xu, “Vssd: Vision mamba with non- causal state space duality,” inProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2025

work page 2025
[14]

You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,

J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 779– 788

work page 2016
[15]

Video processing from electro-optical sensors for object detection and tracking in a maritime environment: A survey,

D. K. Prasad, D. Rajan, L. Rachmawati, E. Rajabally, and C. Quek, “Video processing from electro-optical sensors for object detection and tracking in a maritime environment: A survey,”IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1993–2016, 2017

work page 1993
[16]

Saccadedet: A novel dual-stage architecture for rapid and accurate detection in gigapixel images,

W. Li, R. Zhang, H. Lin, Y . Guo, C. Ma, and X. Yang, “Saccadedet: A novel dual-stage architecture for rapid and accurate detection in gigapixel images,” inJoint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 2024, pp. 392– 408

work page 2024
[17]

Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,

Z. Liu, Y . Lin, Y . Cao, H. Hu, Y . Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10 012–10 022

work page 2021
[18]

Deformable DETR: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection,

X. Zhu, W. Su, L. Lu, B. Li, X. Wang, and J. Dai, “Deformable DETR: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

work page 2021
[19]

Feature pyramid networks for object detection,

T.-Y . Lin, P. Doll´ar, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie, “Feature pyramid networks for object detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 2117–2125

work page 2017
[20]

Ship detection with deep learning: a survey,

M. J. Er, Y . Zhang, J. Chen, and W. Gao, “Ship detection with deep learning: a survey,”Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 11 825–11 865, 2023

work page 2023
[21]

Yolo-mrs: An efficient deep learning-based maritime object detection method for unmanned surface vehicles,

C. Yu, H. Yin, C. Rong, J. Zhao, X. Liang, R. Li, and X. Mo, “Yolo-mrs: An efficient deep learning-based maritime object detection method for unmanned surface vehicles,”Applied Ocean Research, vol. 153, p. 104240, 2024

work page 2024
[22]

Yolov8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robustness,

R. Varghese and M. Sambath, “Yolov8: A novel object detection algorithm with enhanced performance and robustness,” in2024 Inter- national conference on advances in data engineering and intelligent computing systems (ADICS). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

work page 2024
[23]

Yolov5s maritime distress target detection method based on swin transformer,

K. Liu, Y . Qi, G. Xu, and J. Li, “Yolov5s maritime distress target detection method based on swin transformer,”IET Image Processing, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1258–1267, 2024

work page 2024
[24]

Hmpnet: A feature ag- gregation architecture for maritime object detection from a shipborne perspective,

Y . Zhang, F. Liu, J. Lyu, Y . Wei, and C. Yu, “Hmpnet: A feature ag- gregation architecture for maritime object detection from a shipborne perspective,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08231, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

A survey of maritime vision datasets,

L. Su, Y . Chen, H. Song, and W. Li, “A survey of maritime vision datasets,”Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, no. 19, pp. 28 873–28 893, 2023

work page 2023
[26]

Maritime vision datasets for autonomous navigation: A comparative analysis,

N. Jungbauer, H. Huang, and H. Mayer, “Maritime vision datasets for autonomous navigation: A comparative analysis,”Maritime Technol- ogy and Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. Manuscript–Manuscript, 2025

work page 2025
[27]

An efficient model for small object detection in the maritime environment,

Z. Shao, Y . Yin, H. Lyu, C. G. Soares, T. Cheng, Q. Jing, and Z. Yang, “An efficient model for small object detection in the maritime environment,”Applied Ocean Research, vol. 152, p. 104194, 2024

work page 2024
[28]

Vision-based maritime object detection covering far and tiny obstacles,

R. Yoneyama and Y . Dake, “Vision-based maritime object detection covering far and tiny obstacles,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 31, pp. 210–215, 2022

work page 2022
[29]

Aboships—an inshore and offshore maritime vessel detection dataset with precise annota- tions,

B. Iancu, V . Soloviev, L. Zelioli, and J. Lilius, “Aboships—an inshore and offshore maritime vessel detection dataset with precise annota- tions,”Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 988, 2021

work page 2021
[30]

Esod: efficient small object detection on high-resolution images,

K. Liu, Z. Fu, S. Jin, Z. Chen, F. Zhou, R. Jiang, Y . Chen, and J. Ye, “Esod: efficient small object detection on high-resolution images,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2024

work page 2024
[31]

Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,

W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y . Fu, and A. C. Berg, “Ssd: Single shot multibox detector,” inEuropean conference on computer vision. Springer, 2016, pp. 21–37

work page 2016
[32]

End-to-end object detection with transformers,

N. Carion, F. Massa, G. Synnaeve, N. Usunier, A. Kirillov, and S. Zagoruyko, “End-to-end object detection with transformers,” in European conference on computer vision. Springer, 2020, pp. 213– 229

work page 2020
[33]

Detrs with collaborative hybrid assignments training,

Z. Zong, G. Song, and Y . Liu, “Detrs with collaborative hybrid assignments training,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 6748–6758

work page 2023
[34]

Sparse DETR: Efficient end-to-end object detection with learnable sparsity,

B. Roh, J. Shin, W. Shin, and S. Kim, “Sparse DETR: Efficient end-to-end object detection with learnable sparsity,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

work page 2022
[35]

Less is more: Focus attention for efficient detr,

D. Zheng, W. Dong, H. Hu, X. Chen, and Y . Wang, “Less is more: Focus attention for efficient detr,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 6674–6683

work page 2023
[36]

Token pruning using a lightweight background aware vision transformer,

S. Sah, R. Kumar, H. Rohmetra, and E. Saboori, “Token pruning using a lightweight background aware vision transformer,” in NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Fine-Tuning in Modern Machine Learning: Principles and Scalability, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09324

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Exploring plain vision transformer backbones for object detection,

Y . Li, H. Mao, R. Girshick, and K. He, “Exploring plain vision transformer backbones for object detection,” inEuropean conference on computer vision. Springer, 2022, pp. 280–296

work page 2022
[38]

Roboflow: Organize, label, and deploy computer vision datasets,

Roboflow, “Roboflow: Organize, label, and deploy computer vision datasets,” https://roboflow.com, accessed: 2025-07-03

work page 2025