arxiv: 2605.10637 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dynamical Criticality Behind Energy-Storage Singularities in Quantum Batteries

Zheng Liu , Wen-Hui Nie , Yi-jia Yang , Lin-Cheng Wang , Chang-shui Yu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 07:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords dynamical quantum phase transitionquantum batteryenergy storage singularitytransverse-field Ising chainfree-fermion modelmomentum-resolved chargingLoschmidt amplitudesignal-to-noise ratio

0 comments

The pith

Dynamical quantum phase transitions correspond to perfect normalized charging of the critical mode in free-fermion quantum batteries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In quench-driven quantum batteries built from free-fermion two-band models, energy-storage singularities arise from dynamical criticality in momentum space rather than from equilibrium phase transitions. For the transverse-field Ising chain, the long-time stored energy forms a dephasing plateau whose dependence on quench strength turns nonanalytic precisely when a real dynamical critical momentum appears. Across the broader class of such batteries, each momentum sector functions as an independent coherent charging channel, and the condition for a dynamical quantum phase transition becomes identical to perfect normalized charging of the critical mode. At those critical times the mode shows a vanishing Loschmidt amplitude, reaches maximal normalized stored energy, and exhibits zero instantaneous power exactly at the turning point between absorption and backflow. The single-mode signal-to-noise ratio also displays sharp features at the same instants, supplying a direct charging-based signature of the transition. Nonequilibrium criticality therefore does not simply raise total energy or power but selects and optimizes specific microscopic charging channels.

Core claim

In free-fermion two-band quantum batteries each momentum sector acts as an independent coherent charging channel, so that the condition for a dynamical quantum phase transition is exactly equivalent to perfect normalized charging of the critical mode. At the critical times this mode possesses a vanishing Loschmidt amplitude, maximal normalized stored energy, and zero instantaneous power at the absorption-to-backflow turning point.

What carries the argument

momentum-resolved description of the charging process, in which each momentum sector functions as an independent coherent charging channel and the DQPT condition maps directly onto perfect normalized charging of the critical mode

If this is right

The long-time stored energy forms a dephasing plateau whose dependence on quench strength is nonanalytic precisely at the appearance of a real dynamical critical momentum.
The single-mode charging signal-to-noise ratio develops sharp signatures at the critical times, providing a direct charging-based probe of the dynamical quantum phase transition.
Nonequilibrium criticality reorganizes energy storage by selecting optimal microscopic charging channels rather than by increasing the total stored energy or power, which remain shaped by noncritical modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The equivalence suggests that deliberately tuning a system across a dynamical quantum phase transition could be used to force a chosen momentum mode into its highest-efficiency charging state.
If similar momentum-resolved coherence survives in weakly interacting or disordered extensions, the same channel-selection mechanism could appear outside the strictly free-fermion regime.
The zero instantaneous power at the critical instant may mark a general optimal stopping time for any protocol that charges an isolated mode to its maximum before backflow begins.

Load-bearing premise

The battery consists of free fermions whose two-band structure lets every momentum sector act as an independent coherent charging channel.

What would settle it

Measure the stored energy plateau versus quench strength in a transverse-field Ising chain battery and check whether a nonanalyticity appears exactly when the dynamical critical momentum condition is satisfied, with the critical mode simultaneously showing zero power at the energy peak.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10637 by Chang-shui Yu, Lin-Cheng Wang, Wen-Hui Nie, Yi-jia Yang, Zheng Liu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Time evolution of the stored-energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Momentum-resolved stored energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Momentum-resolved stored energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Rate function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Energy-storage singularities in quantum batteries are often associated with equilibrium quantum criticality. Here we show that, in quench-driven many-body batteries, such singularities can originate from dynamical criticality in momentum space. Using the transverse-field Ising chain as a representative free-fermion quantum battery, we develop a momentum-resolved description of the charging process. The long-time stored energy forms a dephasing plateau whose dependence on the quench strength becomes nonanalytic when a real dynamical critical momentum emerges. More generally, for free-fermion two-band quantum batteries, each momentum sector acts as an independent coherent charging channel, and the condition for a dynamical quantum phase transition (DQPT) is equivalent to perfect normalized charging of the critical mode. At the critical times, this mode has a vanishing Loschmidt amplitude, maximal normalized stored energy, and zero instantaneous power at the turning point between energy absorption and backflow. We further show that the single-mode charging signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) develops sharp signatures at the same critical times, providing a direct charging-based probe of DQPT. Thus, nonequilibrium criticality does not simply enhance the total stored energy or power, which remain shaped by noncritical modes, but reorganizes energy storage by selecting optimal microscopic charging channels. Our results establish a mode-resolved connection between DQPT and quantum-battery charging, suggesting a route toward controlling many-body energy storage through dynamical criticality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps DQPTs in free-fermion batteries directly onto perfect normalized charging of the critical mode, with clean SNR signatures at those times.

read the letter

The central result is that for free-fermion two-band models the vanishing Loschmidt amplitude of a critical momentum mode coincides exactly with that mode reaching maximum normalized stored energy and zero instantaneous power. In the Ising-chain example this produces a nonanalytic jump in the long-time dephasing plateau once a real critical momentum appears. The momentum-resolved picture treats each k-sector as an independent coherent charger, which follows immediately from the free-fermion decoupling and the geometry of the Bloch vector at the energy extremum. The SNR probe is a useful addition because it turns the same critical times into an observable charging feature without needing Loschmidt-amplitude measurements. The derivations rest on standard quench dynamics and Loschmidt definitions, with no free parameters or self-referential steps. The limitation is that the equivalence is exact only inside these solvable models; the paper does not test whether interactions destroy the one-to-one mapping or merely smear the signatures. The numerics appear straightforward but would need checking for finite-size effects on the SNR peaks. This is useful reading for anyone working on quantum batteries or nonequilibrium thermodynamics who wants a concrete mechanism rather than a generic claim that criticality helps. The thinking is direct and the model is standard, so the work deserves a serious referee even if the scope stays within free fermions.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a momentum-resolved description of quench-driven charging in free-fermion two-band quantum batteries, taking the transverse-field Ising chain as the representative model. It shows that the long-time stored energy forms a dephasing plateau whose dependence on quench strength becomes nonanalytic precisely when a real dynamical critical momentum appears. For general free-fermion two-band systems, the condition for a dynamical quantum phase transition (DQPT) is shown to be equivalent to perfect normalized charging of the critical mode: at the critical times the Loschmidt amplitude vanishes, the normalized stored energy reaches its maximum, and the instantaneous power is zero at the absorption/backflow turning point. The single-mode signal-to-noise ratio is further shown to exhibit sharp signatures at the same critical times. The central conclusion is that dynamical criticality reorganizes energy storage by selecting optimal microscopic charging channels rather than simply increasing total energy or power.

Significance. If the central equivalence holds, the work supplies a clean, mode-resolved link between nonequilibrium dynamical criticality and quantum-battery performance. The exact solvability of free-fermion models permits parameter-free derivations that directly connect the vanishing Loschmidt amplitude to extremal charging observables. This framework identifies the single-mode SNR as a concrete, charging-based diagnostic of DQPTs and suggests a route to control many-body energy storage through the selection of optimal momentum channels.

minor comments (3)

[Section 3] In the paragraph introducing the dephasing plateau, the precise definition of the long-time limit (e.g., whether it is the infinite-time average or a finite but large t) should be stated explicitly to avoid ambiguity with the oscillatory transients.
[Figure 2] Figure 2 (or the corresponding panel showing the plateau versus quench strength) would benefit from an inset or annotation marking the critical quench value at which the real dynamical critical momentum first appears.
[Section 4.3] The single-mode SNR is introduced as a probe of DQPT; a brief comparison with the total (momentum-integrated) SNR would clarify whether the sharp signatures survive ensemble averaging.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and detailed summary of our manuscript, as well as for the favorable assessment of its significance. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no individual points to address point-by-point. The manuscript stands as submitted, with no revisions required based on the feedback received.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central claim equates the DQPT condition (vanishing Loschmidt amplitude of the critical mode) with perfect normalized charging, maximal stored energy, and zero instantaneous power. This equivalence is a direct algebraic consequence of the exact decoupling into independent two-level systems in the free-fermion two-band model: for each momentum sector the time-evolved state is orthogonal to the initial state precisely when its Bloch vector reaches the energy extremum. All steps rest on standard definitions of quench dynamics, Loschmidt amplitude, and instantaneous power with external grounding in the model's Hamiltonian; no parameters are fitted to data subsets and then renamed as predictions, no load-bearing steps invoke self-citations, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the free-fermion two-band model and quench protocol assumptions standard in the field; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Free-fermion two-band quantum batteries where each momentum sector acts as an independent coherent charging channel.
Invoked to develop the momentum-resolved description of the charging process.
domain assumption Transverse-field Ising chain as representative model for quench-driven dynamics.
Chosen to illustrate the emergence of real dynamical critical momentum.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1310 out tokens · 37154 ms · 2026-05-13T07:30:03.649263+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the condition for a dynamical quantum phase transition (DQPT) is equivalent to perfect normalized charging of the critical mode. At the critical times, this mode has a vanishing Loschmidt amplitude, maximal normalized stored energy, and zero instantaneous power
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using the transverse-field Ising chain as a representative free-fermion quantum battery, we develop a momentum-resolved description of the charging process

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

work page 2011
[2]

S. L. Sondhi, S. M. Girvin, J. P. Carini, and D. Shahar, Continu- ous quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 315 (1997)

work page 1997
[3]

Z.-G. Lu, G. Tian, X.-Y . L ¨u, and C. Shang, Topological quan- tum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180401 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Rossini, G

D. Rossini, G. M. Andolina, and M. Polini, Many-body local- ized quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. B100, 115142 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Grazi, D

R. Grazi, D. Sacco Shaikh, M. Sassetti, N. Traverso Ziani, and D. Ferraro, Controlling energy storage crossing quantum phase transitions in an integrable spin quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 197001 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

Grazi, F

R. Grazi, F. Cavaliere, M. Sassetti, D. Ferraro, and N. Traverso Ziani, Charging free fermion quantum batteries, Chaos, Soli- tons & Fractals196, 116383 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

Grazi, D

R. Grazi, D. Ferraro, and N. Traverso Ziani, Universal features of non-analytical energy storage in quantum critical quantum batteries, Energies18, 10.3390/en18236116 (2025)

work page doi:10.3390/en18236116 2025
[8]

Sch ¨utzhold, M

R. Sch ¨utzhold, M. Uhlmann, Y . Xu, and U. R. Fischer, Sweep- ing from the superfluid to the mott phase in the Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 200601 (2006)

work page 2006
[9]

U. R. Fischer, R. Sch ¨utzhold, and M. Uhlmann, Bogoliubov theory of quantum correlations in the time-dependent Bose- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A77, 043615 (2008)

work page 2008
[10]

Uhlmann, R

M. Uhlmann, R. Sch ¨utzhold, and U. R. Fischer, V ortex quantum creation and winding number scaling in a quenched spinor Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 120407 (2007)

work page 2007
[11]

Uhlmann, R

M. Uhlmann, R. Sch ¨utzhold, and U. R. Fischer,O(N) symmetry-breaking quantum quench: Topological defects ver- sus quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. D81, 025017 (2010)

work page 2010
[12]

Uhlmann, R

M. Uhlmann, R. Sch ¨utzhold, and U. R. Fischer, System size scaling of topological defect creation in a second-order dy- namical quantum phase transition, New Journal of Physics12, 095020 (2010)

work page 2010
[13]

M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 135704 (2013)

work page 2013
[14]

Vajna and B

S. Vajna and B. D ´ora, Disentangling dynamical phase tran- sitions from equilibrium phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B89, 161105 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

Vajna and B

S. Vajna and B. D ´ora, Topological classification of dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B91, 155127 (2015)

work page 2015
[16]

Sharma, U

S. Sharma, U. Divakaran, A. Polkovnikov, and A. Dutta, Slow quenches in a quantum ising chain: Dynamical phase transi- tions and topology, Phys. Rev. B93, 144306 (2016)

work page 2016
[17]

Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review, Rep

M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 054001 (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

J. Lang, B. Frank, and J. C. Halimeh, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A geometric picture, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 130603 (2018)

work page 2018
[19]

Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A brief survey, Europhysics Letters125, 26001 (2019)

M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: A brief survey, Europhysics Letters125, 26001 (2019)

work page 2019
[20]

K. Yang, L. Zhou, W. Ma, X. Kong, P. Wang, X. Qin, X. Rong, Y . Wang, F. Shi, J. Gong, and J. Du, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B100, 085308 (2019)

work page 2019
[21]

K. Cao, H. Hou, and P. Tong, Exploring dynamical phase tran- sitions in thexychain through a linear quench: Early and long- term perspectives, Phys. Rev. A110, 042209 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Baghran, R

R. Baghran, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Competition of long- range interactions and noise at a ramped quench dynamical 6 quantum phase transition: The case of the long-range pairing kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. B110, 064302 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Zeng and S

Y . Zeng and S. Chen, Relation between equilibrium quantum phase transitions and dynamical quantum phase transitions in two-band systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 064307 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

Nie, M.-Y

W.-H. Nie, M.-Y . Zhang, and L.-C. Wang, Flux-quench induced dynamical quantum phase transitions in an extended xy spin- chain, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 653, 130110 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

C. Y . Wong, T. H. Hui, P. D. Sacramento, and W. C. Yu, Entan- glement in quenched extended su-schrieffer-heeger model with anomalous dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054312 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

Jurcevic, H

P. Jurcevic, H. Shen, P. Hauke, C. Maier, T. Brydges, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, M. Heyl, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Direct observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions in an interacting many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 080501 (2017)

work page 2017
[27]

Fl ¨aschner, D

N. Fl ¨aschner, D. V ogel, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, D.-S. L¨uhmann, M. Heyl, J. C. Budich, L. Mathey, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology, Nature Physics14, 265 (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

Zhang, G

J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V . Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Ob- servation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53- qubit quantum simulator, Nature551, 601 (2017)

work page 2017
[29]

X.-Y . Guo, C. Yang, Y . Zeng, Y . Peng, H.-K. Li, H. Deng, Y .- R. Jin, S. Chen, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of a dy- namical quantum phase transition by a superconducting qubit simulation, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 044080 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

Fully optimised variational simulation of a dynamical quantum phase transition on a trapped-ion quantum computer

L. Gover, V . Wimalaweera, F. Azad, M. DeCross, M. Foss-Feig, and A. G. Green, Fully optimised variational simulation of a dynamical quantum phase transition on a trapped-ion quantum computer (2025), arXiv:2502.06961 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[31]

K. Wang, X. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Simulating dynamic quantum phase transitions in pho- tonic quantum walks, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 020501 (2019)

work page 2019
[32]

Tian, H.-X

T. Tian, H.-X. Yang, L.-Y . Qiu, H.-Y . Liang, Y .-B. Yang, Y . Xu, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions with correspondence in an excited state phase dia- gram, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 043001 (2020)

work page 2020
[33]

Alicki and M

R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013)

work page 2013
[34]

Campaioli, F

F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, and S. Vinjanampathy, Quantum batteries, inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Funda- mental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (Springer Inter- national Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 207–225

work page 2018
[35]

Gyhm and U

J.-Y . Gyhm and U. R. Fischer, Beneficial and detrimental entan- glement for quantum battery charging, A VS Quantum Science 6, 012001 (2024)

work page 2024
[36]

F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quan- tacell: powerful charging of quantum batteries, New Journal of Physics17, 075015 (2015)

work page 2015
[37]

Dou and F.-M

F.-Q. Dou and F.-M. Yang, Superconducting transmon qubit- resonator quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A107, 023725 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

Barra, Dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys

F. Barra, Dissipative charging of a quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 210601 (2019)

work page 2019
[40]

Song, J.-L

W.-L. Song, J.-L. Wang, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.-H. An, Self-discharging mitigated quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020405 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

Rinaldi, R

D. Rinaldi, R. Filip, D. Gerace, and G. Guarnieri, Reliable quantum advantage in quantum battery charging, Phys. Rev. A 112, 012205 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

J.-Y . Gyhm, D. ˇSafr´anek, and D. Rosa, Quantum charging ad- vantage cannot be extensive without global operations, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 140501 (2022)

work page 2022
[43]

Campaioli, S

F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

work page 2024
[44]

Maillette de Buy Wenniger, S

I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger, S. E. Thomas, M. Maffei, S. C. Wein, M. Pont, N. Belabas, S. Prasad, A. Harouri, A. Lemaˆıtre, I. Sagnes, N. Somaschi, A. Auff`eves, and P. Senellart, Experi- mental analysis of energy transfers between a quantum emitter and light fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260401 (2023)

work page 2023
[45]

Ferraro, F

D. Ferraro, F. Cavaliere, M. G. Genoni, G. Benenti, and M. Sas- setti, Opportunities and challenges of quantum batteries, Nature Reviews Physics8, 115 (2026)

work page 2026
[46]

Campaioli, F

F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C ´eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 150601 (2017)

work page 2017
[47]

Ferraro, M

D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V . Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid-state quan- tum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

work page 2018
[48]

G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, M. Campisi, V . Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Extractable work, the role of correlations, and asymptotic freedom in quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 047702 (2019)

work page 2019
[49]

G. M. Andolina, M. Keck, A. Mari, V . Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Quantum versus classical many-body batteries, Phys. Rev. B99, 205437 (2019)

work page 2019
[50]

T. P. Le, J. Levinsen, K. Modi, M. M. Parish, and F. A. Pollock, Spin-chain model of a many-body quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A97, 022106 (2018)

work page 2018
[51]

Jordan and E

P. Jordan and E. Wigner, ¨Uber das paulische ¨Aquivalenzverbot, Zeitschrift f¨ur Physik47, 631 (1928)

work page 1928
[52]

Barouch, B

E. Barouch, B. M. McCoy, and M. Dresden, Statistical mechan- ics of the XY model. i, Phys. Rev. A2, 1075 (1970)

work page 1970
[53]

Farina, G

D. Farina, G. M. Andolina, A. Mari, M. Polini, and V . Giovan- netti, Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: An open-system approach, Phys. Rev. B99, 035421 (2019)

work page 2019
[54]

T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. Sen (De), Quantum battery with non-hermitian charging, Phys. Rev. A109, 042207 (2024). END MA TTER Charging-energy fluctuations and signal-to-noise ratio.— We further characterize the stability of the charging process through the charging-energy variance. For each momentum mode, ∆Ek(t)=2ϵ i(k)A(k) sin2[ϵ f (k)t],(15...

work page 2024