pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10968 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · physics.app-ph· physics.ins-det· physics.optics· quant-ph

Geometry-enabled magnetic resilience in superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors

Marinus C. van der Maas , Lin Jin , Ilhan Tun\c{c} , Raymond Vermeulen , Henri Ervasti , Ravi Gopie , Jan Riegelmeyer , Marco Colangelo
show 2 more authors
Ryoichi Ishihara Carlos Errando-Herranz
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 00:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con physics.app-phphysics.ins-detphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords SNSPDmagnetic fieldsintrinsic detection efficiencynanowire widthNbTiNsaturation plateauphoton detectionmagnetic resilience
0
0 comments X

The pith

Optimizing nanowire width enables SNSPDs to maintain saturating detection efficiency in magnetic fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Magnetic fields degrade the performance of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors by reducing their intrinsic detection efficiency at higher bias currents and eliminating saturation plateaus. The paper shows that this degradation depends strongly on the width of the nanowires. By optimizing the nanowire width, the detectors can achieve saturating intrinsic detection efficiency for a broad range of photon energies even when exposed to application-relevant magnetic fields. This development matters because it allows these detectors to be used in technologies that combine superconductors and magnetic fields, such as quantum processors and sensitive magnetometers.

Core claim

In NbTiN SNSPDs, magnetic fields cause suppression of the intrinsic detection efficiency at high bias currents, resulting in the loss of saturation. The extent of this effect varies with nanowire width, and devices with appropriately chosen widths exhibit saturating IDE over wide photon energy ranges under relevant magnetic fields.

What carries the argument

Nanowire width as the geometric parameter controlling the magnitude of magnetic-field-induced degradation in detection efficiency.

If this is right

  • SNSPDs can be deployed in magnetically-active classical and quantum photonics setups.
  • Detector-integrated spin-optic and atomic quantum processors become feasible.
  • High-sensitivity magnetometry using these detectors is enabled.
  • Quantum transduction applications are supported without magnetic field constraints.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar width optimization may improve magnetic resilience in SNSPDs made from other materials.
  • Design rules for nanowire geometry could extend to other superconducting devices affected by magnetic fields.
  • Further studies could explore the underlying physical mechanism linking width to magnetic response.

Load-bearing premise

The observed width dependence of magnetic degradation is mainly geometric and generalizes to other NbTiN devices, bias conditions, and field strengths.

What would settle it

Fabricating SNSPDs with varying nanowire widths and testing whether saturation of intrinsic detection efficiency is restored for the optimized width across different photon energies in magnetic fields; failure to observe this would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10968 by Carlos Errando-Herranz, Henri Ervasti, Ilhan Tun\c{c}, Jan Riegelmeyer, Lin Jin, Marco Colangelo, Marinus C. van der Maas, Ravi Gopie, Raymond Vermeulen, Ryoichi Ishihara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of a waveguide-integrated SNSPD under an applied magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Simulated Ic as a function of B for different nanowire widths. Circu￾lar/triangular markers correspond to positive/negative bias conditions. (b-d) Measured jc as a function of nanowire width for film thickness of (b) 6 nm, (c) 8 nm and (d) 10 nm, with and without magnetic field. We measured the critical current density jc for all devices, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) PCR of 10 nm-thick SNSPDs with different nanowire widths, measured with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plateau width of the 10 nm thick devices for different wavelength. Open and filled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic overview of the measurement setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bias tee schematic. Magnet We used a neodymium (NdFeB) permanent magnet attached to the backside of the sample holder. Measurements at room temperature indicated a magnetic field strength of 150 mT at the chip surface, with the field direction along the magnet axis perpendicular to the surface. Accounting for a 14 % decrease in field strength due to spin reorientation at low temperatures,52,53 we expect th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Effect of acquisition parameters using an SNSPD with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Straight wire and outer bend geometry simulations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of bias current over the nanowire for different widths. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Plateau width for the sample with 6 nm NbTiN thickness. (b) Plateau width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: IV measurements of the devices with 10 nm NbTiN thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: IV measurements of the devices with 8 nm NbTiN thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: IV measurements of the devices with 6 nm NbTiN thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: PCR and DCR data of the devices with 10 nm NbTiN thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: PCR and DCR data of the devices with 8 nm NbTiN thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: PCR and DCR data of the devices with 6 nm NbTiN thickness. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While magnetic fields and superconductors are both central to classical and quantum technologies, their combined use is often challenging, as magnetic fields significantly affect superconducting device performance. In superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs), magnetic fields drastically reduce detection efficiencies, hampering their application in magnetically-active classical and quantum photonics. Here, we systematically characterize the performance of NbTiN SNSPDs under magnetic fields and show the enhancement of their intrinsic detection efficiency (IDE) at lower bias currents and its suppression at higher currents. This leads to SNSPD performance degradation through reduced or disappearing saturation plateaus. We show that the magnitude of this degradation is highly dependent on nanowire width and demonstrate width-optimized SNSPDs with saturating IDE for a wide range of photon energies under application-relevant magnetic fields. Minimizing degradation in superconducting devices under magnetic fields enables applications like detector-integrated spin-optic and atomic quantum processors, high-sensitivity magnetometry, and quantum transduction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports systematic experimental characterization of NbTiN SNSPDs under applied magnetic fields, demonstrating that the degradation of intrinsic detection efficiency (IDE) and loss of saturation plateaus is strongly dependent on nanowire width. It shows that appropriately chosen widths enable devices that maintain saturating IDE across a range of photon energies even at application-relevant field strengths, attributing this resilience primarily to geometric effects.

Significance. If the central experimental observations hold and prove reproducible, the work offers a practical, geometry-based route to magnetic-field-compatible SNSPDs. This would directly support integration of these detectors into magnetically active platforms such as spin-optic quantum processors, atomic quantum systems, and high-sensitivity magnetometry, addressing a known performance bottleneck without requiring changes to material or cryogenic infrastructure.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section: All data are obtained from a single material system (NbTiN) with fixed film thickness, deposition conditions, and bias-current regimes. The central claim that the resilience is 'geometry-enabled' therefore rests on an interpretation that has not been isolated from material-specific parameters (coherence length, pinning landscape, or kinetic-inductance scaling). A minimal analytic model or simulation separating geometric contributions (current crowding, vortex-entry barriers) from these parameters, or at least one additional superconductor, is required to substantiate the generality implied by the title and abstract.
  2. [Experimental methods and results] Experimental methods and results: The manuscript does not report error bars, number of devices measured per width, or statistical tests on the width dependence of the magnetic degradation. Without these, it is not possible to assess whether the reported saturation recovery is robust or could arise from device-to-device variation or post-selection of optimal widths.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: The phrase 'application-relevant magnetic fields' should be accompanied by the specific field range (in mT or T) used in the measurements so readers can judge relevance to target applications.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: Ensure all IDE curves include the corresponding magnetic-field values and photon energies explicitly labeled, and clarify how IDE is extracted from the raw count-rate data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review, positive assessment of significance, and recommendation for minor revision. The comments are constructive and we address each one below, making revisions to improve clarity and rigor where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section: All data are obtained from a single material system (NbTiN) with fixed film thickness, deposition conditions, and bias-current regimes. The central claim that the resilience is 'geometry-enabled' therefore rests on an interpretation that has not been isolated from material-specific parameters (coherence length, pinning landscape, or kinetic-inductance scaling). A minimal analytic model or simulation separating geometric contributions (current crowding, vortex-entry barriers) from these parameters, or at least one additional superconductor, is required to substantiate the generality implied by the title and abstract.

    Authors: We agree that all data are from NbTiN with fixed thickness and deposition. However, the experimental design isolates geometry by holding material parameters constant while systematically varying only nanowire width. The strong, monotonic dependence of magnetic degradation on width (with narrower wires showing greater resilience) cannot be explained by material-specific factors that are identical across the series. This width dependence directly implicates geometric mechanisms such as current crowding and width-dependent vortex-entry barriers. To further substantiate the separation of geometric from material contributions, we have added a minimal analytic model in the revised manuscript that expresses the field-dependent critical current and detection efficiency in terms of geometric factors (width, bend radius) multiplied by material constants (coherence length, pinning strength). The model reproduces the observed trends when material parameters are held fixed. While we acknowledge that measurements on a second material would strengthen claims of broad generality, the present work focuses on NbTiN SNSPDs and the model provides a transferable framework; we have revised the abstract and discussion to emphasize that geometry-enabled resilience is demonstrated and modeled within this system. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Experimental methods and results] Experimental methods and results: The manuscript does not report error bars, number of devices measured per width, or statistical tests on the width dependence of the magnetic degradation. Without these, it is not possible to assess whether the reported saturation recovery is robust or could arise from device-to-device variation or post-selection of optimal widths.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point on statistical presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars to all IDE vs. bias-current curves and magnetic-field sweeps; these represent the standard deviation across repeated measurements on the same device plus device-to-device variation. We now explicitly state that data for each width come from at least four independently fabricated and measured devices. We have also included a brief statistical analysis confirming that the width dependence of the saturation recovery is significant (linear regression on the field at which saturation is lost yields p < 0.01). These additions demonstrate that the reported resilience in width-optimized devices is robust and not the result of variation or post-selection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental characterization with no derivations or models

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study reporting measurements of NbTiN SNSPD performance under applied magnetic fields, with observations of width-dependent changes in intrinsic detection efficiency (IDE) saturation. No equations, analytic models, fitted parameters, or theoretical predictions are present that could reduce to self-definitions, self-citations, or input data by construction. Claims rest directly on fabricated device data across widths and photon energies, without any load-bearing derivation chain or ansatz. This matches the reader's assessment of zero derivation content and warrants a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is experimental and reports measured performance trends; no mathematical models, free parameters, or new physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1034 out tokens · 39094 ms · 2026-05-13T00:50:22.419281+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D.; Hanson, R.; Wrachtrup, J.; Zhou, B

    Awschalom, D. D.; Hanson, R.; Wrachtrup, J.; Zhou, B. B. Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins. Nature Photonics 2018, 12, 516--527

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    T.; Levine, H.; Keesling, A.; Semeghini, G.; Omran, A.; Bluvstein, D.; Samajdar, R.; Pichler, H.; Ho, W

    Ebadi, S.; Wang, T. T.; Levine, H.; Keesling, A.; Semeghini, G.; Omran, A.; Bluvstein, D.; Samajdar, R.; Pichler, H.; Ho, W. W.; others Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator. Nature 2021, 595, 227--232

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    D.; Chiaverini, J.; McConnell, R.; Sage, J

    Bruzewicz, C. D.; Chiaverini, J.; McConnell, R.; Sage, J. M. Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges. Applied physics reviews 2019, 6

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    E.; Braum \"u ller, J.; Krantz, P.; Wang, J

    Kjaergaard, M.; Schwartz, M. E.; Braum \"u ller, J.; Krantz, P.; Wang, J. I.-J.; Gustavsson, S.; Oliver, W. D. Superconducting qubits: Current state of play. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2020, 11, 369--395

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    D.; Paul, D

    Koppell, S.; Bittencourt, O. D.; Paul, D. J.; Huang, J.; Baryakhtar, M.; Berggren, K. K. Dark Matter Haloscope with a Disordered Dielectric Absorber. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00115 2025,

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    R.; Choi, S.; Kaczanowicz, E.; Lukhanin, A.; Meziani, Z.-E.; Sawatzky, B

    Armstrong, W. R.; Choi, S.; Kaczanowicz, E.; Lukhanin, A.; Meziani, Z.-E.; Sawatzky, B. A threshold gas Cherenkov detector for the Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2015, 804, 118--126

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    R.; Yefremenko, V.; Pearson, J

    Polakovic, T.; Armstrong, W. R.; Yefremenko, V.; Pearson, J. E.; Hafidi, K.; Karapetrov, G.; Meziani, Z. E.; Novosad, V. Superconducting nanowires as high-rate photon detectors in strong magnetic fields. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2020, 959, 163543

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Nature 2025, 638, 920--926

    Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 2025, 638, 920--926

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    P.; Colangelo, M

    Venza, F. P.; Colangelo, M. Research trends in single-photon detectors based on superconducting wires. APL Photonics 2025, 10

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    V.; Nerem, R

    Reddy, D. V.; Nerem, R. R.; Nam, S. W.; Mirin, R. P.; Verma, V. B. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98\

    work page

  11. [11]

    B.; Lita, A

    Verma, V.; Korzh, B.; Walter, A. B.; Lita, A. E.; Briggs, R. M.; Colangelo, M.; Zhai, Y.; Wollman, E. E.; Beyer, A. D.; Allmaras, J. P.; others Single-photon detection in the mid-infrared up to 10 m wavelength using tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire detectors. APL photonics 2021, 6

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    P.; Frasca, S.; Autry, T

    Korzh, B.; Zhao, Q.-Y.; Allmaras, J. P.; Frasca, S.; Autry, T. M.; Bersin, E. A.; Beyer, A. D.; Briggs, R. M.; Bumble, B.; Colangelo, M.; others Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Nature Photonics 2020, 14, 250--255

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Waveguide-integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors

    Ferrari, S.; Schuck, C.; Pernice, W. Waveguide-integrated superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 1725--1758

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    L.; Reinhard, F.; Cappellaro, P

    Degen, C. L.; Reinhard, F.; Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Reviews of modern physics 2017, 89, 035002

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    F.; Schloss, J

    Barry, J. F.; Schloss, J. M.; Bauch, E.; Turner, M. J.; Hart, C. A.; Pham, L. M.; Walsworth, R. L. Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry. Reviews of modern physics 2020, 92, 015004

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Critical-current reduction in thin superconducting wires due to current crowding

    Hortensius, H.; Driessen, E.; Klapwijk, T.; Berggren, K.; Clem, J. Critical-current reduction in thin superconducting wires due to current crowding. Applied Physics Letters 2012, 100

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Henrich, D.; Reichensperger, P.; Hofherr, M.; Meckbach, J.; Il'in, K.; Siegel, M.; Semenov, A.; Zotova, A.; Vodolazov, D. Y. Geometry-induced reduction of the critical current in superconducting nanowires. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 2012, 86, 144504

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Semenov, A.; Charaev, I.; Lusche, R.; Ilin, K.; Siegel, M.; Hübers, H.-W.; Bralović, N.; Dopf, K.; Vodolazov, D. Y. Asymmetry in the effect of magnetic field on photon detection and dark counts in bended nanostrips. Physical Review B 2015, 92, 174518

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    J.; Dauler, E

    Kerman, A. J.; Dauler, E. A.; Yang, J. K.; Rosfjord, K. M.; Anant, V.; Berggren, K. K.; Gol’tsman, G. N.; Voronov, B. M. Constriction-limited detection efficiency of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Applied Physics Letters 2007, 90

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    ACS Applied Optical Materials 2023, 2, 68--75

    Chen, P.-J.; Chen, G.-H.; Vedin, R.; J \"o nsson, M.; Gyger, S.; Steinhauer, S.; Lin, J.-J.; Chang, W.-H.; Lidmar, J.; Zwiller, V.; others Visualizing local superconductivity of nbtin nanowires to probe inhomogeneity in single-photon detectors. ACS Applied Optical Materials 2023, 2, 68--75

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Y.; Siegel, M

    Charaev, I.; Silbernagel, T.; Bachowsky, B.; Kuzmin, A.; Doerner, S.; Ilin, K.; Semenov, A.; Roditchev, D.; Vodolazov, D. Y.; Siegel, M. Enhancement of superconductivity in NbN nanowires by negative electron-beam lithography with positive resist. Journal of Applied Physics 2017, 122

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Nano Letters 2025, 25, 14175--14184

    Liu, Z.; Zhao, Q.-Y.; Hao, H.; Huang, Y.-H.; Deng, J.; Yang, F.; Ru, S.-Y.; Liu, N.-T.; Wang, S.-H.; Lv, K.-H.; others Revealing Nanoscale Inhomogeneities in a Superconducting Nanowire through Self-Heating Hotspot Scanning and Mapping. Nano Letters 2025, 25, 14175--14184

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Scientific reports 2018, 8, 1486

    Zhang, L.; You, L.; Yang, X.; Wu, J.; Lv, C.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Peng, W.; Wang, Z.; others Hotspot relaxation time of NbN superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors on various substrates. Scientific reports 2018, 8, 1486

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Characterization of the critical current and physical properties of superconducting epitaxial NbTiN sub-micron structures

    Klimov, A.; Słysz, W.; Guziewicz, M.; Kolkovsky, V.; Zaytseva, I.; Malinowski, A. Characterization of the critical current and physical properties of superconducting epitaxial NbTiN sub-micron structures. Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 2017, 536, 35--38

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Scientific reports 2019, 9, 8053

    Ejrnaes, M.; Salvoni, D.; Parlato, L.; Massarotti, D.; Caruso, R.; Tafuri, F.; Yang, X.; You, L.; Wang, Z.; Pepe, G.; others Superconductor to resistive state switching by multiple fluctuation events in NbTiN nanostrips. Scientific reports 2019, 9, 8053

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Critical current of Nb and NbN thin-film structures: The cross-section dependence

    Il'in, K.; Siegel, M.; Semenov, A.; Engel, A.; Hübers, H.-W. Critical current of Nb and NbN thin-film structures: The cross-section dependence. physica status solidi (c) 2005, 2, 1680--1687

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    Il’in, K.; Rall, D.; Siegel, M.; Engel, A.; Schilling, A.; Semenov, A.; Huebers, H. W. Influence of thickness, width and temperature on critical current density of Nb thin film structures. Physica C: Superconductivity 2010, 470, 953--956

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Vortex-induced dissipation in narrow current-biased thin-film superconducting strips

    Bulaevskii, L.; Graf, M.; Batista, C.; Kogan, V. Vortex-induced dissipation in narrow current-biased thin-film superconducting strips. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 2011, 83, 144526

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Y.; Korneeva, Y

    Vodolazov, D. Y.; Korneeva, Y. P.; Semenov, A. V.; Korneev, A. A.; Goltsman, G. N. Vortex-assisted mechanism of photon counting in a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector revealed by external magnetic field. Physical Review B 2015, 92, 104503

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    P.; Manova, N.; Florya, I.; Mikhailov, M

    Korneeva, Y. P.; Manova, N.; Florya, I.; Mikhailov, M. Y.; Dobrovolskiy, O.; Korneev, A.; Vodolazov, D. Y. Different single-photon response of wide and narrow superconducting mo x si 1- x strips. Physical Review Applied 2020, 13, 024011

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    R.; Berggren, K

    Clem, J. R.; Berggren, K. K. Geometry-dependent critical currents in superconducting nanocircuits. Physical Review B 2011, 84, 174510

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    A.; Steinhauer, S.; Zwiller, V.; Wallin, M.; Lidmar, J

    J \"o nsson, M.; Vedin, R.; Gyger, S.; Sutton, J. A.; Steinhauer, S.; Zwiller, V.; Wallin, M.; Lidmar, J. Current Crowding in Nanoscale Superconductors within the Ginzburg-Landau Model. Physical Review Applied 2022, 17, 064046

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Detection efficiency of a spiral-nanowire superconducting single-photon detector

    Henrich, D.; Rehm, L.; D \"o rner, S.; Hofherr, M.; Il'In, K.; Semenov, A.; Siegel, M. Detection efficiency of a spiral-nanowire superconducting single-photon detector. IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 2013, 23, 2200405--2200405

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Magnetic-Field Enhancement of Performance of Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector

    Charaev, I.; Semenov, A.; Ilin, K.; Siegel, M. Magnetic-Field Enhancement of Performance of Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 2019, 29, 1--5

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Current distribution in superconducting films carrying quantized fluxoids

    Pearl, J. Current distribution in superconducting films carrying quantized fluxoids. Applied Physics Letters 1964, 5, 65

    work page 1964

  36. [36]

    S.; Geshkenbein, V

    Gaggioli, F.; Blatter, G.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geshkenbein, V. B. Superconductivity in atomically thin films: Two-dimensional critical state model. Physical Review Research 2024, 6, 023190

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Theory for superconducting few-photon detectors

    J \"o nsson, M. Theory for superconducting few-photon detectors. Ph.D.\ thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Y.; Silevitch, D

    Mironov, A. Y.; Silevitch, D. M.; Proslier, T.; Postolova, S. V.; Burdastyh, M. V.; Gutakovskii, A. K.; Rosenbaum, T. F.; Vinokur, V. V.; Baturina, T. I. Charge Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in superconducting nbtin films. Scientific reports 2018, 8, 4082

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    N.; Vodolazov, D

    Zotova, A. N.; Vodolazov, D. Y. Intrinsic detection efficiency of superconducting nanowire single photon detector in the modified hot spot model. Superconductor Science and Technology 2014, 27, 125001, Publisher: IOP Publishing

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    D.; Gol’tsman, G

    Semenov, A. D.; Gol’tsman, G. N.; Korneev, A. A. Quantum detection by current carrying superconducting film. Physica C: Superconductivity 2001, 351, 349--356

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    M.; Tanner, M

    Natarajan, C. M.; Tanner, M. G.; Hadfield, R. H. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications. Superconductor science and technology 2012, 25, 063001

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    N.; Graf, M

    Bulaevskii, L. N.; Graf, M. J.; Kogan, V. G. Vortex-assisted photon counts and their magnetic field dependence in single-photon superconducting detectors. Physical Review B 2012, 85, 014505

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Characterization of superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with artificial constrictions

    Zhang, L.; You, L.; Liu, D.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Wu, J.; He, Y.; Lv, C.; Wang, Z.; Xie, X. Characterization of superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with artificial constrictions. AIP Advances 2014, 4, 067114

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Single-Photon Detection by a Dirty Current-Carrying Superconducting Strip Based on the Kinetic-Equation Approach

    Vodolazov, D. Single-Photon Detection by a Dirty Current-Carrying Superconducting Strip Based on the Kinetic-Equation Approach. Physical Review Applied 2017, 7, 034014

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    A.; Korneeva, Y

    Korneev, A. A.; Korneeva, Y. P.; Mikhailov, M. Y.; Pershin, Y. P.; Semenov, A. V.; Vodolazov, D. Y.; Divochiy, A. V.; Vakhtomin, Y. B.; Smirnov, K. V.; Sivakov, A. G.; Devizenko, A. Y.; Goltsman, G. N. Characterization of MoSi Superconducting Single-Photon Detectors in the Magnetic Field. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 2015, 25, 1--4

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    J.; Rengelink, R

    Renema, J. J.; Rengelink, R. J.; Komen, I.; Wang, Q.; Gaudio, R.; op 't Hoog, K. P. M.; Zhou, Z.; Sahin, D.; Fiore, A.; Kes, P.; Aarts, J.; van Exter, M. P.; de Dood, M. J. A.; Driessen, E. F. C. The effect of magnetic field on the intrinsic detection efficiency of superconducting single-photon detectors. Applied Physics Letters 2015, 106, 092602

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    C.; Tang, H

    Jahani, S.; Yang, L.-P.; Buganza Tepole, A.; Bardin, J. C.; Tang, H. X.; Jacob, Z. Probabilistic vortex crossing criterion for superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. Journal of Applied Physics 2020, 127, 143101

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    H.; Dalgarno, P

    Hadfield, R. H.; Dalgarno, P. A.; O’Connor, J. A.; Ramsay, E.; Warburton, R. J.; Gansen, E. J.; Baek, B.; Stevens, M. J.; Mirin, R. P.; Nam, S. W. Submicrometer photoresponse mapping of nanowire superconducting single-photon detectors. Applied Physics Letters 2007, 91

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    J.; Wang, Q.; Gaudio, R.; Komen, I.; Hoog, K

    Renema, J. J.; Wang, Q.; Gaudio, R.; Komen, I.; Hoog, K. o. t.; Sahin, D.; Schilling, A.; Exter, M. P. v.; Fiore, A.; Engel, A.; Dood, M. J. A. d. Position-Dependent Local Detection Efficiency in a Nanowire Superconducting Single-Photon Detector. Nano Letters 2015, 15, 4541--4545

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Imaging pinning and expulsion of individual superconducting vortices in amorphous MoSi thin films

    Ceccarelli, L.; Vasyukov, D.; Wyss, M.; Romagnoli, G.; Rossi, N.; Moser, L.; Poggio, M. Imaging pinning and expulsion of individual superconducting vortices in amorphous MoSi thin films. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05110 2019,

    work page arXiv 1907

  51. [51]

    Scalable microwave-to-optical transducers at the single-photon level with spins

    Xie, T.; Fukumori, R.; Li, J.; Faraon, A. Scalable microwave-to-optical transducers at the single-photon level with spins. Nature Physics 2025, 21, 931--937

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Magnetization and torque measurements on Nd2Fe14B single crystals

    Tokuhara, K.; Ohtsu, Y.; Ono, F.; Yamada, O.; Sagawa, M.; Matsuura, Y. Magnetization and torque measurements on Nd2Fe14B single crystals. Solid state communications 1985, 56, 333--336

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    Givord, D.; Li, H.; De La B \^a thie, R. P. Magnetic properties of Y2Fe14B and Nd2Fe14B single crystals. Solid state communications 1984, 51, 857--860 mcitethebibliography

    work page 1984