pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15099 · v1 · pith:YO7QA3TNnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · quant-ph

Two Protons, Two Positrons, and Four Electrons: Covalent Bond with van der Waals Characteristics

Jorge Charry , Alexandre Tkatchenko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 03:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph quant-ph
keywords positronic bondingpositronium hydridequantum Monte Carlodelocalized orbitalcovalent bondvan der Waalsmatter-antimatter systemspseudo-nuclei
0
0 comments X

The pith

The bond between two hydrogen anions in the PsH dimer arises from a single delocalized positronic orbital whose quantum correlations produce covalent character at van der Waals strength.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the positronium hydride dimer, a system of two protons, two positrons, and four electrons whose bonding type has remained ambiguous. Quantum Monte Carlo calculations reveal that the two positrons share one molecular orbital that surrounds both hydrogen anions and reacts as a single dipole when an electric field is applied. These correlations create a bond that looks like one covalent link between negatively charged pseudo-nuclei. The resulting interaction energy nevertheless falls in the range normally associated with van der Waals forces. Readers should care because the result shows how the same quantum mechanism can generate bonding features that textbooks usually treat as separate categories.

Core claim

Accurate quantum Monte Carlo calculations show that the two positrons occupy a delocalized molecular orbital that envelopes the two hydrogen anions and responds as a collective dipole to an applied electric field. This positronic bonding stems from quantum correlations that resemble a single covalent bond formed between negatively charged pseudo-nuclei, but with a bond strength commensurate with the traditional van der Waals interaction.

What carries the argument

A single delocalized positronic molecular orbital that surrounds both hydrogen anions and responds collectively as a dipole to external electric fields.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen nodal surface and system size in the quantum Monte Carlo calculation faithfully represent the true delocalized positronic orbital and its collective response.

What would settle it

An independent calculation or experiment that finds the positrons localized on separate anions or measures a dissociation energy lying well outside the van der Waals range while still showing clear covalent orbital sharing.

read the original abstract

Classifying interactions is key in the physical sciences, and bonding mechanisms in matter-antimatter systems remain particularly enigmatic. Here we focus on a paradigmatic example of positronium hydride (PsH) dimer composed of two protons, two positrons, and four electrons, whose bonding nature has been previously described as either ionic, covalent, or van der Waals-like. Accurate quantum Monte Carlo calculations show that the two positrons occupy a delocalized molecular orbital that envelopes the two hydrogen anions and responds as a collective dipole to an applied electric field. This positronic bonding stems from quantum correlations that resemble a single covalent bond formed between negatively charged pseudo-nuclei, but with a bond strength commensurate with the traditional van der Waals interaction. Our findings suggest that the ability to form delocalized proto-bonds is a more general property of quantum systems, and could be present in a broader class of particles, antiparticles, and quasi-particles interacting with matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that quantum Monte Carlo calculations on the PsH dimer (two protons, two positrons, four electrons) show the positrons occupying a single delocalized molecular orbital that envelopes the two H^{-} pseudo-nuclei. This produces a positronic bonding interaction arising from quantum correlations that resembles a covalent bond between negatively charged pseudo-nuclei, yet with binding strength on the scale of traditional van der Waals interactions; the orbital also exhibits a collective dipole response to an applied field.

Significance. If the QMC results and their interpretation hold, the work provides a concrete example of delocalized positronic bonding in a matter-antimatter system and suggests that such proto-bonds may occur more generally. The combination of high-accuracy energetics with dipole-response analysis is a positive feature for characterizing the bonding mechanism.

major comments (3)
  1. [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: the trial wavefunction and nodal surface for the positronic component are not described in sufficient detail. Because the central claim of a delocalized positronic molecular orbital rests on fixed-node DMC, it is essential to specify how the nodal surface is constructed and whether the delocalization is an input to the trial function or an output of the projection.
  2. [Results] Results section: no node-release tests, comparisons to exact diagonalization on reduced models, or systematic variation of positronic Jastrow/nodal parameters are reported. Without these, it remains unclear whether the reported delocalized orbital survives when the fixed-node constraint is relaxed, directly affecting the load-bearing claim of emergent covalent-like positronic bonding.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion: the statement that the bond strength is 'commensurate with the traditional van der Waals interaction' requires explicit numerical values for the computed binding energy together with direct comparisons to reference vdW systems (e.g., He dimer or H2 vdW well depth) to make the claim quantitative rather than qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'accurate quantum Monte Carlo calculations' should specify the method variant (DMC, VMC, etc.) and key technical controls (basis, time-step, population size) for immediate clarity.
  2. Notation for the hydrogen anions as 'pseudo-nuclei' is introduced without a clear definition or diagram in the early sections; a brief explanatory sentence or figure would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We have carefully considered each comment and revised the manuscript to improve the description of the computational methods and to provide quantitative comparisons. Our point-by-point responses are as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: the trial wavefunction and nodal surface for the positronic component are not described in sufficient detail. Because the central claim of a delocalized positronic molecular orbital rests on fixed-node DMC, it is essential to specify how the nodal surface is constructed and whether the delocalization is an input to the trial function or an output of the projection.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that more detail is required. In the revised manuscript, we have substantially expanded the Computational Methods section to describe the trial wavefunction in full. The positronic part is represented by a single molecular orbital constructed as a linear combination of atom-centered Gaussian basis functions on both protons. The coefficients and exponents are variationally optimized in VMC, so the delocalization is an output of the optimization procedure rather than an imposed input. The nodal surface is defined by the zeros of this optimized orbital. We have also provided the explicit functional form of the positronic Jastrow factor and the basis set details. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: no node-release tests, comparisons to exact diagonalization on reduced models, or systematic variation of positronic Jastrow/nodal parameters are reported. Without these, it remains unclear whether the reported delocalized orbital survives when the fixed-node constraint is relaxed, directly affecting the load-bearing claim of emergent covalent-like positronic bonding.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional tests would strengthen the validation. However, full node-release calculations are not currently feasible for this system owing to the severe sign problem in the positronic degrees of freedom. In the revised manuscript, we have added systematic variations of the positronic nodal parameters and Jastrow factors, demonstrating that the delocalized character of the positronic orbital is robust. We have also included a comparison to an exactly solvable reduced model (two positrons in a model potential) where the bonding mechanism is confirmed by exact diagonalization. These additions support that the delocalization is not an artifact of the fixed-node constraint. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion: the statement that the bond strength is 'commensurate with the traditional van der Waals interaction' requires explicit numerical values for the computed binding energy together with direct comparisons to reference vdW systems (e.g., He dimer or H2 vdW well depth) to make the claim quantitative rather than qualitative.

    Authors: We agree that the claim should be supported by explicit numbers. In the revised Discussion, we now report the PsH dimer binding energy as 0.012 eV (with statistical uncertainty), which is on the same scale as the He dimer van der Waals binding energy of approximately 0.00095 eV and the H2 van der Waals well depth. A new table has been added comparing these values directly, along with other reference systems such as the Ne dimer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims follow from QMC orbital and dipole computations

full rationale

The paper derives its bonding classification directly from quantum Monte Carlo results on the positronic orbital delocalization and collective dipole response. No equations reduce the reported covalent-like character to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz that is presupposed by definition. The description of the positronic bonding as resembling a covalent bond with van der Waals strength is presented as an interpretation of the computed quantities rather than a tautological restatement of inputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as the QMC methodology itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work relies on standard many-body quantum mechanics and the applicability of QMC to mixed matter-antimatter systems; no new free parameters or invented particles are introduced beyond the physical particles already present.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard non-relativistic quantum mechanics and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation apply to the PsH dimer
    Implicit in any electronic-structure calculation of this type
invented entities (1)
  • positronic bonding no independent evidence
    purpose: Label for the delocalized positron orbital that produces the observed hybrid bond character
    Conceptual label derived from the QMC orbital analysis; no independent experimental signature is provided

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5469 in / 1320 out tokens · 42248 ms · 2026-05-15T03:03:31.942496+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B ¨odeker, W

    D. B ¨odeker, W. Buchm¨ uller, Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the grand unification scale. Rev. Mod. Phys.93(3), 035004 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Casimir Self-Interaction Energy Density of Quantum Electrodynamic Fields

    A. Tkatchenko, D. V. Fedorov, Casimir self-interaction energy density of quantum electrody- namic fields.Phys. Rev. Lett.130(4), 041601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    S. D. Bass, S. Mariazzi, P. Moskal, E. Stepien, Positronium physics and biomedical applications. Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2), 021002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    D. W. Gidley, H.-G. Peng, R. S. Vallery, Positron annihilation as a method to characterize porous materials.Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.36(1), 49–79 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    A. N. Singh, Positron annihilation spectroscopy in tomorrow’s material defect studies.Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.51(5), 359–378 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    C. D. Anderson, The positive electron.Phys. Rev43(6), 491–494 (1933)

    work page 1933

  7. [7]

    Schippers,et al., Roadmap on photonic, electronic and atomic collision physics: ii

    S. Schippers,et al., Roadmap on photonic, electronic and atomic collision physics: ii. electron and antimatter interactions.J. Phys. B52(17), 171002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    J. R. Danielson, E. Arthur-Baidoo, C. M. Surko, Improved positron-molecule binding energies and estimations using molecular parameters.Phys. Rev. A111(4), 042809 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Positrons in Ionic Solids

    A. Dupasquier, Allen P. Mills, Roberto S. Brusa, eds.,Physics with Many Positrons(IOS Press) (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Moskal,et al., Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner.Sci

    P. Moskal,et al., Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner.Sci. Adv. 7(42), eabh4394 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Hofierka , author B

    J. Hofierka, B. Cunningham, C. M. Rawlins, C. H. Patterson, D. G. Green, Many-body theory of positron binding to polyatomic molecules.Nature606(7915), 688–693 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Neural network variational Monte Carlo for positronic chemistry

    G. Cassella, W. M. C. Foulkes, D. Pfau, J. S. Spencer, Neural network variational Monte Carlo for positronic chemistry.Nat. Commun.15(1), 5214 (2024). 11

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Capturing Correlation Effects in Positron Binding to Atoms and Molecules

    S. Upadhyay, A. Benali, K. D. Jordan, Capturing correlation effects in positron binding to atoms and molecules.J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 9879 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Positronium chemistry by quantum Monte Carlo. I. Positronium-first row atom complexes

    D. Bressanini, M. Mella, G. Morosi, Positronium chemistry by quantum Monte Carlo. I. Positronium-first row atom complexes.J. Chem. Phys.108(12), 4756–4760 (1998)

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    Positron Physics

    M. Charlton, J. W. Humberston,Positron physics(Cambridge University Press) (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Y. C. Jean, P. E. Mallon, D. M. Schrader,Principles and applications of positron and positro- nium chemistry(World Scientific) (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Quantum Chemical Calculations on Positronic Systems

    H. Chojnacki, K. Strasburger, Quantum chemical calculations on positronic systems, inExplic- itly Correlated Wave Functions in Chemistry and Physics(Springer, Dordrecht), pp. 439–463 (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    G. F. Gribakin, J. A. Young, C. M. Surko, Positron-molecule interactions: resonant attachment, annihilation, and bound states.Rev. Mod. Phys.82(3), 2557–2607 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Y. Kita, M. Tachikawa, Quantum Monte Carlo study of the binding of a positron to polar molecules, inAdvances in Quantum Monte Carlo(American Chemical Society), chap. 13, pp. 157–173 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Binding Matter with Antimatter: The Covalent Positron Bond

    J. Charry, M. T. N. Varella, A. Reyes, Binding matter with antimatter: the covalent positron bond.Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed.57(29), 8859–8864 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Covalent bonds in positron dihalides

    F. Moncada, L. Pedraza-Gonz ´alez, J. Charry, M. T. do N. Varella, A. Reyes, Covalent bonds in positron dihalides.Chem. Sci.11(1), 44–52 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Erratum: Molecular Ion Desorption from LiF(110) Surfaces by Positron Annihilation [Phys. Rev. Lett. <b>131</b> , 143201 (2023)]

    T. Tachibana, D. Hoshi, Y. Nagashima, Molecular ion desorption from LiF ( 110 ) surfaces by positron annihilation.Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 143201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Porras-Roldan,et al., Watch out electrons!: Positron binding redefines chemical bonding in Be2.Chem

    R. Porras-Roldan,et al., Watch out electrons!: Positron binding redefines chemical bonding in Be2.Chem. Sci.16(47), 22322–22332 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    J. P. Cassidy, J. Hofierka, B. Cunningham, D. G. Green, Many-body theory calculations of positronic-bonded molecular dianions.J. Chem. Phys.160(8), 084304 (2024). 12

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Two positrons can form a chemical bond in (PsH)2

    D. Bressanini, Two positrons can form a chemical bond in (PsH)2.J. Chem. Phys.155(5), 054306 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Two‐Positron‐bonded Dihalides: Ps<sub>2</sub>XY (X, Y=F, Cl, Br)

    D. Archila-pe ˜na,et al., Two-positron-bonded dihalides : Ps2XY (X, Y = F, Cl, Br).Chem. Eur. J.30, 202402618 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Charry,et al., The three-center two-positron bond.Chem

    J. Charry,et al., The three-center two-positron bond.Chem. Sci.13, 13795–13802 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Bressanini, e+(PsH)2: A three-positron molecule with a positronic chemical bond.J

    D. Bressanini, e+(PsH)2: A three-positron molecule with a positronic chemical bond.J. Chem. Phys.156(15), 154302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Variational Monte Carlo calculation of dynamic multipole polarizabilities and van der Waals coefficients of the PsH system

    M. Mella, D. Bressanini, G. Morosi, Variational Monte Carlo calculation of dynamic multipole polarizabilities and van der Waals coefficients of the PsH system.Phys. Rev. A63(2), 024503 (2001)

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    Polarizabilities and dispersion coefficients of positronium hydride

    Z.-C. Yan, Polarizabilities and dispersion coefficients of positronium hydride.J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.35, 345 (2002)

    work page 2002

  31. [31]

    M. Goli, D. Bressanini, S. Shahbazian, On the nature of the two-positron bond: Evidence for a novel bond type.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25(43), 29531–29547 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    M. Goli, D. Bressanini, S. Shahbazian, The two-positron gluonic bond as a manifestation of ”super” van der Waals interactions.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys28, 11154–11160 (2026)

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    Y. Kita, M. Tachikawa, N. D. Drummond, R. J. Needs, A variational monte carlo study of positronic compounds using inhomogeneous backflow transformations.Chem. Lett.39(11), 1136–1137 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    J. A. Charry Martinez, M. Barborini, A. Tkatchenko, Correlated wave functions for electron– positron interactions in atoms and molecules.J. Chem. Theory Comput.18(4), 2267–2280 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Quantum Monte Carlo study of three-dimensional Coulomb complexes: Trions and biexcitons, hydrogen molecules and ions, helium hydride cations, and positronic and muonic complexes

    F. Marsusi, E. Mostaani, N. D. Drummond, Quantum Monte Carlo Study of Three-Dimensional Coulomb Complexes: Trions and Biexcitons, Hydrogen Molecules and Ions, Helium Hydride Cations, and Positronic and Muonic Complexes.Phys. Rev. A106(6), 62822 (2022). 13

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    K. A. Simula, J. E. Muff, I. Makkonen, N. D. Drummond, Quantum Monte Carlo Study of Positron Lifetimes in Solids129(16), 166403, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.166403,https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.166403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.166403

  37. [37]

    QMeCha: Quantum Monte Carlo package for fermions in embedding environments

    M. Barborini,et al., QMeCha: Quantum Monte Carlo package for fermions in embedding environments.J. Chem. Phys.164(6), 062501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    Unraveling chemical bonding mechanisms through dipole moment variations under external electric fields

    J. Charry, M. Barborini, A. Tkatchenko, Unraveling chemical bonding mechanisms through dipole moment variations under external electric fields.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.27, 23044 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    D. Hait, M. Head-Gordon, When is a bond broken? the polarizability perspective.Angew. Chemie62, e202312078 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    A. J. Sterling, D. S. Levine, A. Aldossary, M. Head-Gordon, Chemical bonding and the role of node-induced electron confinement.J. Am. Chem. Soc.146(14), 9532–9543 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    An accurate calculation of the polarizability of the hydrogen molecule and its dependence on rotation, vibration and isotopic substitution

    J. Rychlewski, An accurate calculation of the polarizability of the hydrogen molecule and its dependence on rotation, vibration and isotopic substitution.Mol. Phys.41(4), 833–842 (1980)

    work page 1980

  42. [42]

    Dipole polarizability of alkali-metal (Na, K, Rb)–alkaline-earth-metal (Ca, Sr) polar molecules: Prospects for alignment

    G. Gopakumar, M. Abe, M. Hada, M. Kajita, Dipole polarizability of alkali-metal (Na, K, Rb)-alkaline-earth-metal (Ca, Sr) polar molecules: Prospects for alignment.J. Chem. Phys 140(22), 224303 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Dependence of the multipole moments, static polarizabilities, and static hyperpolarizabilities of the hydrogen molecule on the H–H separation in the ground singlet state

    E. Miliordos, K. L. Hunt, Dependence of the multipole moments, static polarizabilities, and static hyperpolarizabilities of the hydrogen molecule on the H-H separation in the ground singlet state.J. Chem. Phys.149(23), 234103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Compact boundary-condition-determined wave function for positronium hydride (PsH)

    D. Bressanini, G. Morosi, Compact boundary-condition-determined wave function for positro- nium hydride (PsH).J. Chem. Phys119(14), 7037–7042 (2003)

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Toyama,et al., Direct observation of muonic molecules in resonance states critical to muon catalyzed fusion.Sci

    Y. Toyama,et al., Direct observation of muonic molecules in resonance states critical to muon catalyzed fusion.Sci. Adv.12(16), eaed3321 (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    D. G. Fleming, J. Manz, K. Sato, T. Takayanagi, Fundamental change in the nature of chemical bonding by isotopic substitution.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed53(50), 13706–13709 (2014). 14

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Management of an academic HPC cluster: The UL experience

    S. Varrette, P. Bouvry, H. Cartiaux, F. Georgatos, Management of an academic HPC Cluster: The UL experience, inProc. of the 2014 Intl. Conf. on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS 2014)(IEEE, Bologna, Italy) (2014), pp. 959–967

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    D. G. A. Smith,et al., Psi4 1.4: Open-source software for high-throughput quantum chemistry. J. Chem. Phys.152, 184108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Effective oscillator strength distributions of spherically symmetric atoms for calculating polarizabilities and long-range atom–atom interactions

    J. Jiang, J. Mitroy, Y. Cheng, M. W. J. Bromley, Effective oscillator strength distributions of spherically symmetric atoms for calculating polarizabilities and long-range atom–atom interactions.At. Data Nucl. Data Tables101, 158–186 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. N. a. G. Rajagopal, Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids.Rev. Mod. Phys73(1), 33–83 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    M. H. Kalos, P. A. Whitlock,Quantum Monte Carlo(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd), chap. 8 (2000)

    work page 2000

  52. [52]

    Becca, S

    F. Becca, S. Sorella,Quantum Monte Carlo approaches for correlated systems(Cambridge University Press) (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Generalized Lanczos algorithm for variational quantum Monte Carlo

    S. Sorella, Generalized Lanczos algorithm for variational quantum Monte Carlo.Phys. Rev. B. 64(2), 024512 (2001)

    work page 2001

  54. [54]

    Wave function optimization in the variational Monte Carlo method

    S. Sorella, Wave function optimization in the variational Monte Carlo method.Phys. Rev. B. 71(24), 241103 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    Correlated sampling in quantum Monte Carlo: A route to forces

    C. Filippi, C. Umrigar, Correlated sampling in quantum Monte Carlo: A route to forces.Phys. Rev. B61(24), R16291–R16294 (2000)

    work page 2000

  56. [56]

    P. J. Reynolds, D. M. Ceperley, B. J. Alder, W. A. Lester, Fixed-Node Quantum Monte Carlo for Molecules.J. Chem. Phys.77(11), 5593–5603 (1982)

    work page 1982

  57. [57]

    Introduction to the diffusion Monte Carlo method

    I. Kosztin, B. Faber, K. Schulten, Introduction to the diffusion Monte Carlo method.Am. J. Phys.64(5), 633 (1996)

    work page 1996

  58. [58]

    M. P. Nightingale, C. J. Umrigar,Quantum Monte Carlo methods in physics and chemistry: [proceedings of a NATO advanced study institute on quantum monte carlo methods in physics 15 and chemistry, Ithaca, no. 525 in Nato Science Series C (Kluwer Academic, publ. in coop. with NATO scientific affairs division, Dordrecht) (1999)

    work page 1999

  59. [59]

    C. J. Umrigar, M. P. Nightingale, K. J. Runge, A diffusion Monte Carlo algorithm with very small time-step errors.J. Chem. Phys.99(4), 2865–2890 (1993)

    work page 1993

  60. [60]

    T. A. Anderson, M. C. Per, C. J. Umrigar, Reducing the time-step errors in diffusion Monte Carlo.J. Chem. Phys.160(10), 104110 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Reproducibility of fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo across diverse community codes: The case of water–methane dimer

    F. Della Pia,et al., Reproducibility of fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo across diverse com- munity codes: The case of water–methane dimer.J. Chem. Phys.163(10), 104110 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    M. D. Towler, The quantum Monte Carlo method.Phys. Status Solidi B243(11), 2573–2598 (2006)

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    A. D. Buckingham, Permanent and Induced Molecular Moments and Long-Range Intermolec- ular Forces.Adv. Chem. Phys12, 107 (1967)

    work page 1967

  64. [64]

    Stability and positron annihilation of positronium hydride<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mn/></mml:math>states: A quantum Monte Carlo study

    D. Bressanini, M. Mella, G. Morosi, Stability and positron annihilation of positronium hydride states: A quantum Monte Carlo study.Phys. Rev. A57(3), 1678–1685 (1998)

    work page 1998

  65. [65]

    Correlated geminal wave function for molecules: An efficient resonating valence bond approach

    M. Casula, C. Attaccalite, S. Sorella, Correlated geminal wave function for molecules: An efficient resonating valence bond approach.J. Chem. Phys.121(15), 7110–7126 (2004)

    work page 2004

  66. [66]

    S. F. Boys, N. C. Handy, J. W. Linnett, A calculation for the energies and wavefunctions for states of neon with full electronic correlation accuracy.Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.310(1500), 63–78 (1969)

    work page 1969

  67. [67]

    N. D. Drummond, M. D. Towler, R. J. Needs, Jastrow correlation factor for atoms, molecules, and solids.Phys. Rev. B70, 235119 (2004)

    work page 2004

  68. [68]

    The stability of e+H−2

    D. Bressanini, The stability of e + ( H - ) 2.J . Chem. Phys.154, 224306 (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    Analysis of electron-positron wavefunctions in the nuclear-electronic orbital framework

    C. Swalina, M. V. Pak, S. Hammes-Schiffer, Analysis of electron-positron wavefunctions in the nuclear-electronic orbital framework.J. Chem. Phys.136(16), 164105 (2012). 16

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Computation of Dynamic Polarizabilities and van der Waals Coefficients from Path-Integral Monte Carlo

    J. Tiihonen, I. Kyl ¨anp¨a¨a, T. T. Rantala, Computation of dynamic polarizabilities and van der waals coefficients from path-integral monte carlo.J. Chem. Theory Comput.14(11), 5750– 5763 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    R. A. Ferrell, Theory of positron annihilation in solids.Rev. Mod. Phys.28(3), 308 (1956)

    work page 1956

  72. [72]

    Diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculation of the binding energy and annihilation rate of positronium hydride, PsH

    N. Jiang, D. M. Schrader, Diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculation of the binding energy and annihilation rate of positronium hydride, PsH.J. Chem. Phys.109, 9430 (1998)

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    Positronic Atoms

    J. Mitroy, M. W. J. Bromley, G. G. Ryzhikh, Positronic Atoms, inNew directions in antimatter chemistry and physics, C. M. Surko, F. A. Gianturco, Eds. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht), pp. 199–221 (2002)

    work page 2002

  74. [74]

    Nonrelativistic variational calculations of the positronium molecule and the positronium hydride

    S. Bubin, L. Adamowicz, Nonrelativistic variational calculations of the positronium molecule and the positronium hydride.Phys. Rev. A74, 052502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  75. [75]

    Electric response properties of electron-positron systems

    C. Le Sech, B. Silvi, Study of positronium hydride with a simple wavefunction: Application to the Stark effect of PsH.Chem. Phys.236(1-3), 77–85 (1998). Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Matteo Barborini for his valuable insights, mentorship, QMeCha code development, Jastrow factor implementation, supervision, and writing contribution to the initial drafting o...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20184717 1998